Translate

Friday, November 4, 2022

The Fed Is Officially Losing Money

 


BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2022/10/31/the-fed-is-officially-losing-money-n1641415;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

 The Fed is losing money. Not a typo.

The private corporations that control America’s money supply called the Federal Reserve have lost money for the first time since 1915. The loss was foreshadowed in the Fed meeting in September when it was clear there would be more outgo than income.

The problems were triggered by an overspending Democrat Congress that exacerbated the issues set in motion by the government’s response to the 2008 market meltdown. It will take years to get back in the black. Years.  And you’ll your grandkids will pay for it all, because they’re the nation’s cash machine.

“The central bank’s operating losses have increased in recent weeks because the interest it is paying banks and money-market funds to keep money at the Fed now exceeds the income it earns on some $8.3 trillion in Treasury and mortgage-backed securities it accumulated during bond-buying stimulus programs over the past 14 years,” The Wall Street Journal reported.

The Fed will continue to manipulate the markets with its monetary policy as per usual.

The Journal reported that “even though the net interest losses have no impact on the Fed’s day-to-day operations, they could cause political headaches down the road, in part because they are large and novel…” Novel — there’s that word again. This is untested territory.

It’s bad enough that the private Fed, whose Board of Governors are government actors, is losing money. But experts like Peter Schiff didn’t think it would happen until next year.

The way the Fed works is that its losses are turned into IOUs and paid later when there’s better cash flow. As Schiff put it, “we live in a world where the Federal Reserve gets to make its own accounting rules. And according to its own accounting rules, any net loss magically turns into a “deferred asset.” The immediate effect will be larger budget deficits because “the US government will see a reduction in revenue.”

The Journal notes that “the Fed doesn’t mark its assets to market but instead recognizes losses on its securities holdings only if it sells assets. The Fed is currently shrinking its asset portfolio passively, allowing up to $95 billion in securities to mature every month.”

The Biden Administration and Democrat Congress are spending taxpayer dollars at an alarming, inflation-inducing rate and now the government “will see a reduction in revenue.” Who’s caught in the middle of that monetary see-saw? Us.

Morgan Stanley chief global economist Seth Carpenter told the Journal that “the arrangement is akin to an institution facing a 100% tax rate and offsetting current losses with future income.” Don’t try this at home.

The Fed policies have sent tech and other stocks plummeting. Just last week, Meta, the Facebook parent company, lost 70% of its market capitalization. The Journal reported that the net effect of the Fed’s policies of “bond-buying and negative real interest rates drove investors into growth stocks, which inflated tech valuations. Social media companies have also been hurt by lower advertising spending as businesses cut marketing budgets amid economic uncertainty.”

Talk about a ripple effect.

Related: Lefty Washington State Is Now ‘Ground Zero for Wave Election Upset’ in Senate Race

Americans have responded to profligate spending by the Democrats and higher prices by teeing up an expected red wave in the November elections. The polls show people are afraid for their country. Fully 79% of people polled by CBS believe the country is “out of control.”

Heading into the final week before election day, 8 in 10 voters describe things in the country today as “out of control,” as opposed to “under control.” 

This Fed news will only cause more concern.

Republicans Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell had better be ready to lead and start cleaning up this mess, because Americans will be depending on them.

FBI Is Classifying 'Misinformation' As An 'Election Crime'

 

Image

 



BY Robert Spencer

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2022/10/28/heres-what-i-asked-the-fbis-election-crimes-coordinator-about-its-calling-misinformation-an-election-crime-n1640888

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

 The Biden regime’s notorious Disinformation Governance Board is dead (for now), but the regime’s quest to stigmatize and criminalize all dissent from its agenda is still very much alive. On Thursday, that indispensable team of actual journalists, Project Veritas, released a document entitled “2022 Midterm Elections Social Media Analysis Cheat Sheet” and subtitled “What Are Election Crimes?” This FBI document “details what FBI agents should look out for leading up to November 8.” Some of it really discusses what FBI agents should be looking out for: Election Interference, Election Fraud, Voter Intimidation, and the like. But included with all the other “Election Crimes” are the Left’s favorite euphemisms for true and accurate information that dissents from the Leftist agenda: “Disinformation” and “Misinformation.”

 

The “Election Crimes” document defines “Disinformation” as “false or inaccurate information intended to mislead others,” adding that “disinformation campaigns on social media are used to deliberately confuse, trick, or upset the public.” “Misinformation” is “false or misleading information spread mistakenly or unintentionally.”

Back on June 30, J. Christian Adams revealed at PJ Media that the FBI was working with the Democracy Fund, “a hyper-funded progressive money source,” on election issues. Among the FBI officials implicated in this partisan and corrupt collusion was Lindsay Capodilupo, who was identified as the FBI’s “Election Crimes Coordinator.”

Now, there are a lot of great titles in the world, but Lindsay Capodilupo must be proud to have one of the absolute greatest. With the FBI all in on the Russian Collusion hoax, it’s unclear whether the “Election Crimes Coordinator” is actually fighting against “election crimes” or coordinating and implementing them, and that’s just perfect for Merrick Garland’s desperately corrupt and politicized FBI.

Related: EXCLUSIVE: FOIAs Reveal Progressive Money Fueling FBI, DOJ, Leftist Activist and Election Official Coordination

Anyway, as it happens, I have met Lindsay Capodilupo, as she was one of the agents who questioned me after ISIS terrorists attempted to murder us all at our free speech event in Garland, Texas, in May 2015, while an FBI informant egged the terrorists on, telling them to “tear up Texas.” So on Friday morning, I sent her an email:

Dear Ms. Capodilupo

Greetings. You may remember me, as we had some interaction some years ago.

I’m writing now because I see from this (https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2022/06/30/foias-reveal-progressive-money-fueling-fbi-doj-leftist-activist-and-election-official-coordination-n1609558) that you are now “Election Crimes Coordinator” for the FBI. Congratulations on your appointment.

Now it appears from this document (https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1585698721886457857/photo/1) that among “Election Crimes,” the FBI is including “Misinformation.” Hence my questions. These are on the record, for publication in an article I’m working on today.

  1. What criteria does the FBI use to determine what is and is not “Misinformation”? It appears that previously, and perhaps now as well, you were working with the Democracy Fund, a highly partisan organization. Do you allow Democracy Fund, or the Southern Poverty Law Center, or any other entity, to determine what constitutes “Misinformation”? If so, please specify which and explain why you believe this group is trustworthy.
  2. Given the fact that several stories initially classified as “misinformation” have turned out to be true (notably Hunter Biden’s laptop, certified as Russian disinformation by 50 top intelligence professionals), do you plan to build in some appeals process to your prosecution of “Misinformation” as an “Election Crime,” or will your judgment be final, absolute, and not subject to appeal or discussion?
  3. On what basis can you classify alleged “Misinformation” as any kind of crime at all, in light of the First Amendment and the necessarily subjective character of your judgment of this alleged misinformation?
  4. Are you at all concerned that false charges of “Misinformation” will be used to silence political opponents of this administration, or any future administration, and thereby destroy America as a free society?
  5. Are you at all concerned about the decisively partisan character of the FBI in recent years, and the increasing public perception that there is a two-tier justice system, with the FBI aggressively sending SWAT teams to arrest inoffensive pro-life activists, elderly political commentators such as Roger Stone, and others who are out of favor with the regime, while allowing Leftists such as Hunter Biden with multiple clear violations of numerous laws to escape all prosecution of any kind?

Many thanks in advance for your answers; if at all possible, please send them before noon today, as I’m working on a tight deadline.

Kindest regards and thanks for your indispensable service to the United States of America

Robert Spencer

Needless to say, as of this writing, there’s been no response from Ms. Capodilupo; if I hear from her later, I’ll most certainly add an update. I didn’t really expect her to respond, and she likely thought my questions were impossibly leading and thus unworthy of notice, but in reality, they were no more so than the questions Leftist “journalists” routinely ask patriots. And they’re salient questions, to which Americans need to know the answers if trust is ever going to be restored in the FBI and other institutions. Some FBI official, if not the bureau’s “Election Crimes Coordinator,” should answer them. It’s a shame that the FBI thinks it’s better to stonewall such inquiries than to face the American people with some transparency and honesty.

_______________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://aclj.org/government-corruption/shocking-leak-from-fbi-classifying-misinformation-as-an-election-crime

FBI Whistleblower Leaks Document Showing Agency Targeting ‘Misinformation’ Under ‘Election Crimes’ Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections | Project Veritas

 SEE: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-fbi-whistleblower-leaks-document-showing-agency-targeting/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

  

Document titled “2022 Midterm Elections Social Media Analysis Cheat Sheet” details what FBI agents should look out for leading up to November 8.


  • The document lists “misinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or misleading information spread mistakenly or unintentionally.”

  • The document also lists “disinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or innacurate information intended to mislead others.”

  • It continues, “Disinformation campaigns on social media are used to deliberately confuse, trick, or upset the public.”

  • The FBI reminded its agents that the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment exist, under the “Things to Consider” section of the document.

  • The Bureau flagged the potential for “Voter/Ballot Fraud” in this election.

[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Oct. 27, 2022] Project Veritas published a newly leaked document today provided by an FBI whistleblower.

The document details how the Bureau will tackle what they consider to be “election crimes.”

It lists “misinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or misleading information spread mistakenly or unintentionally.”

The document also lists “disinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or inaccurate information intended to mislead others.”

It continues, “Disinformation campaigns on social media are used to deliberately confuse, trick, or upset the public.”

These categories could raise questions about who gets to determine what is “misinformation” and/or “disinformation.”

Recently, the Biden administration attempted to create the “Disinformation Governance Board” under the Department of Homeland Security. After severe pushback from the public due to free speech concerns, the federal government pulled the plug on this idea.

In another section of the leaked document labelled “Things to Consider,” the FBI reminded its agents that the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment exist. Both amendments are in the Bill of Rights and protect Americans’ rights to free speech and against “unreasonable” searches or seizures.

The Bureau also flagged the potential for “Voter/Ballot Fraud” in this election, an activity that some have attempted to rule out as a threat to the American electoral system.

About Project Veritas

James O'Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work. Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity. O'Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.  

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues raised through its investigations.

Is This Joe Biden’s Biggest Lie Ever?

 BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/10/is-this-joe-bidens-biggest-lie-ever;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

 New in PJ Media:

https://twitter.com/FreeBeacon/status/1585736778819911680

Joe Biden says he’s a Catholic, but his handlers work relentlessly to keep the sacrifices to Moloch going; Pious Old Joe and his henchmen never saw a restriction on abortion that they could support. Joe Biden says he is down-to-earth ol’ Lunchbucket Joe, when actually he has spent most of his life growing rich in the public “service” and enjoying all the perks of being one of the Washington elite. Joe Biden says he is president, but he is clearly not in charge and, as is increasingly evident, not even capable of being in charge. But on Thursday afternoon, Old Joe may have given us his biggest whopper ever, the most appalling lie from this career liar in over fifty years in the public eye.

Biden said: “Today, the most common price of gas in America is three dollars and thirty-nine cents, down from over five dollars when I took office.” Now, coming from a guy who said that if he was elected president, he would cure cancer, and who thinks that if we raise taxes high enough and buy electric cars, we’ll be able to change the weather, this may not seem like much, but it is. Skyrocketing gas prices are this administration’s singular achievement. There was even a rash of stickers featuring Joe proclaiming “I Did That!” ready to be stuck onto gas pumps next to the outrageous price per gallon.

And make no mistake: Old Joe Biden really did do that. This is the alleged president who, on his first day in office, killed the Keystone Pipeline. He also suspended new oil and gas leasing and drilling permits for federal land and water, and has been steadfast in his opposition to fracking. He took a nation that was energy independent when he took office and ended up going hat-in-hand to the Saudis to plead (unsuccessfully, of course) for them to lower oil prices so that his party would have even a chance in the midterm elections.

The average gas price on January 20, 2021 wasn’t five dollars a gallon. It was less than half that. The average gas price on January 20, 2021, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, was $2.37 per gallon. According to the same source, Biden is even lying about the average gas price today, which is $3.76, not $3.39. Biden, of course, wants everyone to hate Donald Trump, and so he hopes that he can convince some low-attention, low-information Leftists that gas prices really were high when Bad Orange Man was in the White House, and that now he has saved the day, but this is an outrageous twisting of the facts.

There is more. Read the rest here.


Sunday, May 31, 2020

THIS BLOG IS NOW SUSPENDED

THIS BLOG IS NOW SUSPENDED
Please be advised that this blog is terminated indefinitely. The contents and archives have been transferred to the new Wordpress blog in full. We have spent the month of May working on setting up the theme and style that we feel will be the most comfortable, workable, and complete to everyone's satisfaction. You may continue to refer to the former blog, but because Google has determined that it can and will censor everything that it deems is not politically correct and/or liberal, we have no choice but to activate the Wordpress site. Therefore, please use the new site:
RATHER EXPOSE THEM CHRISTIAN NEWS BLOG

Thursday, May 28, 2020

PRAY FOR SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CHURCH FREEDOM

PRAY FOR SUPREME COURT DECISION 
ON CHURCH FREEDOM 
BY DAVID CLOUD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
May 28, 2020
David Cloud, Way of Life Literature, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org
“I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time” (1 Timothy 2:1-6). The petitions of two churches to override the closures in Illinois and California are before the Supreme Court. Arguments have been heard, and a decision could be pending. The following is from “Illinois church becomes 2nd congregation to file emergency request,” Fox News, May 27, 2020: An Illinois church has filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court, challenging Gov. Jay Pritzker’s closure of houses of worship during the coronavirus crisis a day after another congregation in California made a similar move. The case will be handled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, based on geography, and he has asked the opposing state officials to respond by Thursday evening, just as Justice Elena Kagan asked of the California church that filed an emergency request on Tuesday. Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church and the Logos Baptist Ministries filed the emergency order citing precedent in a 1947 Supreme Court case “Everson v. Board of Education.” In that case, the Court wrote that “Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church… Neither can force nor influence a person to go or remain away from a church against his will.” They argued that the church’s rights were being infringed upon under the Free Exercise and Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and called for the case to be taken up before May 31, the Christian holiday of Pentecost. The plaintiffs argue that the Illinois reopening plan imposes a “unique 10 person limit on religious worship services” that is not imposed on retail, liquor stores, restaurants, office buildings, etc. and other services which have been deemed “essential.”

STATEN ISLAND & BROOKLYN, N.Y.: ENRAGED COVID-CRAZED MOB CHASES UNMASKED WOMAN FROM SUPERMARKET~POLICE TACKLE UNMASKED WOMAN WITH BABY TO THE GROUND IN SUBWAY



STATEN ISLAND & BROOKLYN, N.Y.: ENRAGED COVID-CRAZED MOB CHASES UNMASKED WOMAN FROM SUPERMARKET~POLICE TACKLE UNMASKED WOMAN WITH BABY TO THE GROUND IN SUBWAY
BY SELWYN DUKE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
At least she wasn’t lynched.
In a striking example of the mob mentality at work, a woman was recently chased from a supermarket in Staten Island, New York, because she wasn’t wearing a mask. A now-viral video (below) of the COVID-crazed patrons hurling profanities and screaming at the woman was posted to Twitter Sunday night after user “McAuley” found it on Reddit.
Since April 17, an executive order signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo — who killed nursing-home residents by requiring that their facilities accept virus-positive patients — has compelled New Yorkers to wear masks in public in situations where social distancing is impossible. As a consequence, stores in the state require patrons to wear masks.
Social pressure may be the only way now the mask rule is enforced in New York City, however. For, after a 22-year-old mother was forcibly restrained by police and arrested (video below) on May 13, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that authorities would no longer enforce the mask order in most situations.
Of course, the video above indicates that, once again, a statist politician (de Blasio) has thrown the police under the bus for enforcing rules he and his fellow travelers created/advocate. One may also wonder here when the worlds’ Andrew Cuomos will be arrested for their disastrous nursing-home policies (which smack of negligent manslaughter).
But our current situation is symbolically fascinating: In a time when Wuhan virus concerns are being used as a pretext to ban protests and censor dissenters on social media — to silence people — that muzzling is symbolized by having Americans wear masks covering their mouths.
This said, citizens can still often weigh in (unless their commentary is too powerful, popular, and politically incorrect; then it gets yanked), and leftists certainly did under the Twitter video, as the below selection evidences (hat tip: American Thinker).

Staten Islanders with masks drive out non-mask wearing person in grocery store.
Cool. Finally. Cuz at this point, a maskless person in an indoor place is like a shooter pointing his gun at me.

492 people are talking about this

That isn’t “social pressure”, it’s clinical insanity
It is clinical insanity. 100,000 people in the US have died from a deadly virus and the number keeps going up. All it takes to save lives is wearing a mask and keeping your distance. To be so self-centered that you can't comply with 2 easy requirements is absolutely clinical.

116 people are talking about this

Staten Islanders with masks drive out non-mask wearing person in grocery store.
Finally. The anti-maskers have been bullies & spreaders of the virus. Those of us wearing masks should not put up with them. They are wrong

262 people are talking about this
Then, perhaps missing the irony that the Ku Klux Klan was a Democrat organization, one respondent posted the below:
(Given that a GQ political reporter recently misidentified in print infamous segregationist George Wallace as a Republican, it wouldn’t be surprising if the above respondent really didn’t know the KKK’s party passions.)
Interestingly, just as how the pandemic has caused leftists to have a newfound (provisional) appreciation for state’s powers (when resisting President Trump’s recommendation to “open” back up), American Thinker also points out (tweet below) that some have suddenly seen the value of freedom of association.

I am an American. I'm not forced to wear ANYTHING. UNDERSTAND?
You're not. The stores are also American and are not forced to accept customers in their doors that don't follow their rules. Private businesses don't have to cater to everyone. UNDERSTAND?

292 people are talking about this
What principle! Except, it turns out that this respondent was against freedom of association before he was for it, as the 2017 tweet below, discovered by American Thinker, evidences.

Clearly his argument was for the wedding (he stated he woudl make them other things) , again, keep trying to move the goal posts, and keep failing
No, he did not say he would make them something else, he clearly said he would not participate in their wedding by making something directly for it. He offered to sell them generic things that were already made. He refused to make anything new for their wedding specifically.

See OG Sharpton's other Tweets
But OG Sharpton has company changing with the wind. While many are running around like Chicken Little and going mask crazy, forgotten is that authorities haven’t always been crazy about masks. The World Health Organization stated in late March that there “is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit.”
The same month the CDC also recommended not donning a mask; four weeks later it was all for it. Dr. Anthony Fauci did the same about-face. First he downplayed masks’ effectiveness in early March (video below).
Then he changed his tune (video below) and even seemed to tacitly acknowledge that the earlier recommendation was a lie designed to ensure that medical workers would have masks available.
As the top commenter mockingly said under the first Fauci video, “Simon says........put on a mask....Simon says........take it off.” So what should we do?
The New American wrote last week that “not only can face masks be ineffective, they can help transmit the virus and worsen its effect.” So maybe a face mask is just like Linus’s security blanket — or maybe the jury is still out.
What I do know is that it’s ironic how leftists want all 331 million Americans masked — with exceptions made for the world’s General Flynns.
Related articles: