MUELLER WORKED WITH HAMAS LINKED GROUPS TO PURGE COUNTER-TERROR TRAINING OF MATERIAL OFFENSIVE TO MUSLIMS

MUELLER WORKED WITH HAMAS LINKED GROUPS TO PURGE COUNTER-TERROR TRAINING 

OF MATERIAL OFFENSIVE TO MUSLIMS

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/mueller-worked-with-hamas-linked-groups-to-purge-counterterror-training-of-material-offensive-to-muslims;  

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

As I noted here, this purge was several years in the making, and I was – inadvertently – the one who touched it off. In August 2010, when I gave a talk on Islam and jihad to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force — one of many such talks I gave to government agencies and military groups in those years. While some had counseled me to keep these talks quiet so as to avoid attracting the ire of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the possibility of that pressure seemed to me to make it all the more important to announce my appearances publicly, so as to show that the U.S. government was not going to take dictation from a group linked to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Those who had urged silence were proven correct, however, for the Obama administration was indeed disposed to take dictation from CAIR. CAIR sent a series of letters to Mueller and others demanding that I be dropped as a counter-terror trainer; the organization even started a “coalition” echoing this demand, and Jesse Jackson and other Leftist luminaries joined it.
At the FBI, Mueller made no public comment on CAIR’s demand, and so it initially appeared that CAIR’s effort had failed. But I was never again invited to provide counter-terror training for any government agency, after having done so fairly regularly for the previous five years. CAIR’s campaign to keep me from taking part in counter-terror training was, of course, not personal. They targeted me simply because I told the truth, just as they would target anyone else who dared do so. Everyone else who told the truth was similarly targeted and purged.

“Judicial Watch: Mueller Worked With Radical Islamists to Purge Anti-Terror Training Docs Offensive to Muslims,” by Michael W. Chapman, CNS News, January 23, 2018 (thanks to Lookmann):
Commenting on Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating President Trump for alleged “collusion” with Russia, Judicial Watch said that, as FBI director under President Obama, Mueller purged the Bureau of all anti-terrorism training material that was deemed “offensive” to Muslims. This was done, said Judicial Watch, “after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief.”
Judicial Watch obtained the documents on Mueller and the Muslim groups after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FBI in July 2012. Mueller had met with the Muslims groups on Feb. 8, 2012, after which the curricula purge took place, said Judicial Watch.
“As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands,” said Judicial Watch. “The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism.”
“Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case,” said the government watchdog group.
After that Feb. 8, 2012 meeting, FBI Director Mueller “assured the Muslim groups that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices nationwide,” said Judicial Watch.
“The purge was part of a broader Islamist operation designed to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at-large. The records obtained by Judicial Watch also show similar incidents of Islamic influence operations at the Departments of Justice and State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Obama White House.”
Judicial Watch further reported, “Mueller’s actions have had a widespread effect because many local law enforcement agencies followed the FBI’s lead in allowing Islamic groups like CAIR to dictate what anti-terrorism material could be used to train officers. Among them are police departments in three Illinois cities— Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park—as well as the New York Police Department (NYPD).”
“In the case of the Lombard Police Department,” said Judicial Watch, “CAIR asserted that the instructor of a training course called ‘Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy’ was anti-Muslim though there was no evidence to support it. Like the FBI, Lombard officials got rid of the ‘offensive’ course. The NYPD purged a highly-acclaimed report that’s proven to be a critical tool in terrorism investigations after three New York Muslims, two mosques and an Islamic nonprofit filed a lawsuit.”
“Considering Mueller’s role in much of this, it makes him a bizarre choice to lead the heated Russia investigation,” said the watchdog group.
Judicial Watch’s report on Mueller can be read here…

POPE DENOUNCES "TERRIBLE TERRORIST MASSACRE" IN KABUL: "HOW LONG MUST THE AFGAN PEOPLE BEAR THIS INHUMAN VIOLENCE?"

 

POPE DENOUNCES "TERRIBLE TERRORIST MASSACRE" IN KABUL: "HOW LONG MUST THE AFGAN PEOPLE BEAR THIS INHUMAN VIOLENCE?"

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/pope-denounces-terrible-terrorist-massacre-in-kabul-how-long-must-the-afghan-people-bear-this-inhuman-violence; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

How long? Well, sir, considering that you deny the existence of the motivating ideology behind such attacks and oversee the shunning in Catholic circles of those who identify it, I’d say indefinitely, insofar as you’re actively hindering proper analysis of this threat.
Besides all that is below, Pope Francis has claimed fancifully that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.” It has become a superdogma in the Catholic Church: if you don’t believe that Islam is a Religion of Peace, you will be ruthlessly harassed and silenced by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the hierarchy elsewhere as well. The bishops of the Catholic Church are much more concerned that you believe that Islam is a religion of peace than that you believe in, say, the Nicene Creed.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“Pope Francis Condemns Taliban Attack: ‘How Long Must Afghan People Bear Such Inhuman Violence?,’” by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, January 28, 2018:

On Sunday, Pope Francis denounced the “terrible terrorist massacre” carried out by Islamic militants of the Taliban in the Afghan capital of Kabul Saturday.
After his usual midday prayer of the Angelus in the Vatican Sunday, the Pope turned to the news of Saturday’s slaughter, addressing the thousands of pilgrims gathered in Saint Peter’s Square.
“Yesterday painful news arrived from Afghanistan telling of the terrible terrorist massacre carried out in the capital city of Kabul leaving nearly one hundred dead and numerous injured,” he said.
“A few days ago, another serious attack also on Kabul had sown terror and death in a large hotel,” he continued. “How long must the Afghan people bear this inhuman violence?”…
Pope Francis caused a media stir in early 2017 when he denied the existence of Islamic terrorism.
“Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist,” Francis said in a speech to a world meeting of populist movements in the Vatican last February….
“The poor and the poorer peoples are accused of violence yet, without equal opportunities, the different forms of aggression and conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and will eventually explode,” he said….
“There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religions—and with intolerant generalizations they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia,” he said.
The pope’s earlier statements suggesting economic roots to terror provoked a strong public reaction from the Islamic State terror group, which insisted that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
Pope Francis “has struggled against reality” in his efforts to portray Islam as a religion of peace, declared an article in the ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq, before going on to urge all Muslims to take up the sword of jihad, the “greatest obligation” of a true Muslim.
Some months before, the Pope Francis appeared to suggest that all religions are equally prone to violence and that Islam and Christianity are fundamentally the same in this regard.
“If I speak of Islamic violence, I must speak of Catholic violence,” Francis said. “And no, not all Muslims are violent, not all Catholics are violent. It is like a fruit salad; there’s everything.”

UK: THERESA MAY GOVERNMENT REJECTS PETITION FOR FREE SPEECH ACT & END TO "HATE SPEECH" LAWS

UK: THERESA MAY GOVERNMENT REJECTS PETITION FOR FREE SPEECH ACT & END TO 

"HATE SPEECH" LAWS

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/uk-may-government-rejects-petition-for-free-speech-act-and-end-to-hate-speech-laws;  

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“Hate speech” laws are a tool of the powerful to silence dissenters. The person or group empowered with determining what is and is not “hate speech” has total power over the public discourse, and can criminalize any perspectives that the government does not favor. “Hate speech” laws are, in short, a tool for tyranny, and the freedom of speech is a society’s foremost protection against tyranny. The May government is the betrayer and destroyer of Britain, which is, of course, finished.

“Tory Government REJECTS Petition for a Free Speech Act,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, January 28, 2018:

The British government has rejected a petition calling for a Free Speech Act and an end to laws against so-called ‘hate speech’.
“For several years now the government has been infringing people’s most basic rights to speak freely on matters, by deeming their speech ‘offensive’ or ‘hateful. and declaring that such speech, even online, warrants being fined or jailed,” the petition suggests.
“We demand the legal right to Free Speech, in an Act which will bring an end to the ludicrous notion that ‘hate speech’ and ‘offensive speech’ deserves people be imprisoned or charged … Ideas must be fought with other ideas, not with force.”
The petition system in the United Kingdom allows citizens to have petitions published on a parliament.uk website, subject to certain conditions. The Government is supposed to respond to petitions which pass 10,000 signatures, and the Backbench Business Committee is supposed to “consider” petitions which pass 100,000 signatures for a parliamentary debate.
The Home Office, led by Amber Rudd MP, responded on behalf of Prime Minister Theresa May’s administration as the Free Speech petition reached around 16,000 signatures — rejecting it out of hand.
“The Government is committed to upholding free speech, and legislation is already in place to protect these fundamental rights,” the statement begins — then immediately contradicts itself, adding: “However, this freedom cannot be an excuse to cause harm or spread hatred.”
The statement explains that British citizens have “a right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)”, but that “This is a qualified right … This means that free speech is not absolute.”
The right to freedom of expression as described by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights is certainly qualified, with the document spelling out in no uncertain terms that free speech rights are “subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”
Critics have pointed out that, far from providing citizens with the right to freedom of expression, the European Convention in fact provides governments with the right to restrict freedom of expression on the flimsiest of pretexts, with the caveats concerning the protections of “morals” and “the reputation or rights of others” appearing particularly open to abuse.
The authorities under have if anything appeared more enthusiastic in cracking down on free speech since the nominally conservative Tory Party returned to office in 2010, with the police dedicated significant resources towards arresting people for making “offensive” online comments despite swingeing budget cuts.
Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that police forces increased arrests under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another”,  by up to 877 per cent between 2014 and 2016….

CHURCH OF ENGLAND URGES "UNCONDITIONAL AFFIRMATION OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE...WITHIN THE CHURCH"

  "A PERVERSE GENERATION"

"trans people are cherished and loved by God, who created them, and is present through all the 'twists and turns' of their lives.”

Luke 9:41 | View whole chapter | See verse in context

And Jesus answering said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you, and suffer you? Bring thy son hither.

Matthew 17:17 | View whole chapter | See verse in context

Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him hither to me.

CHURCH OF ENGLAND URGES 

"UNCONDITIONAL AFFIRMATION OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE...WITHIN THE CHURCH"

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2018/01/28/church-of-england-urges-unconditional-affirmation-of-trans-people-within-the-church/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 LONDON — The House of Bishops for the Church of England is urging its 

churches to affirm those who have gender dysphoria and says that “everyone’s 

Christian journey—like the journey to find one’s true identity—is unique.” The 

development has raised concern among evangelical groups, which state that the 

notion is an affront to the Creator and the gospel.

William Nye, the secretary for the House of Bishops, released a document this past week that provides an update on talks among Anglican leaders regarding the welcoming of “transgenders” into the assembly.
As previously reported, last July, the General Synod voted to approve a motion that “recognizing the need for transgender people to be welcomed and affirmed in their parish church, call[ed] on the House of Bishops to consider whether some nationally commended liturgical materials might be prepared to mark a person’s gender transition.”
Chris Newlands from Blackburn, Lancashire proposed the motion, stating, “I hope that we can make a powerful statement to say that we believe that trans people are cherished and loved by God, who created them, and is present through all the twists and turns of their lives.”

In 2015, Newlands told reporters that he concocted the idea after being approached by a girl who identifies as a boy, who wished to be baptized again under her male name.
“I said, ‘Once you’ve been baptized, you’re baptized,’” Newlands recalled to the Guardian at that time. “[But] he said, ‘But I was baptized as a girl, under a different name.’”
“I said, ‘Let me have a think about it.’ So we did, and then we created a service, which was an affirmation of baptismal vows where we could introduce him to God with his new name and his new identity,” he said.

In this month’s guidance, the House of Bishops noted that a number of synod members agreed with Newlands, and pointed to the words of member Lucy Gorman, who asserted that the matter is ultimately about “having a church that is eager to make sure you feel safe and accepted.”
“The House of Bishops welcomes and encourages the unconditional affirmation of trans people, equally with all people, within the Church, the body of Christ, and rejoices in the diversity of that one body, into which all Christians have been baptized by one Spirit,” Nye wrote in all bold to emphasize the statement.
He also noted, in light of discussions as to whether a person’s “new identity” should be marked or recognized in any way in worship, that it had been decided by the House that individual ministers can use the existing Affirmation of Baptismal Faith, which it called “an ideal liturgical rite which trans people can use to mark this moment of personal renewal.”
“The Affirmation … gives priority to the original and authentic baptism of the individual, and the sacramental change it has effected, allowing someone who has undergone a serious and lasting change to re-dedicate their life and identity to Christ,” Nye stated.
“In inviting ministers to use this rite, the House wishes to point out that everyone’s Christian journey—like the journey to find one’s true identity—is unique and encourages ministers to treat these possible pastoral encounters accordingly,” he also asserted. “This approach, familiar to all who care for people during other major life events, takes into account each person’s unique experiences.”
Read the document in full here.
However, the release of the update from the synod drew concern from evangelical groups in the UK, including the organization Christian Concern, which opined that Nye’s words were an affront to the gospel.
“This is collusion with the blasphemous notion that someone can be ‘born in the wrong body.’ It is blasphemous because it claims that God gave a person ‘the wrong body,’ when the bodies of people suffering with gender dysphoria are usually perfectly healthy. Rather, it is their minds and souls that are the site of suffering and confusion,” it said in a statement.
“It is also collusion with hatred and resentment of the male or female body, something that goes directly against what God said when He created everything, namely that it was ‘very good’ (Genesis 1: 31),” the group also noted. “It is therefore an attack on the triune God as Creator of all things. The Christian faith makes no sense at all without the history of creation and fall.”
“Gender transition is actually a moment of personal rebellion against the way the person has been made by God. It is therefore a moment of personal rebellion against God. This should not be celebrated or marked by the church at all, let alone described as a ‘moment of personal renewal,'” it lamented.
Gavin Ashenden also wrote for Anglican Ink in July that the Church of England has presented a false Jesus to the world in matters of both homosexuality and transgenderism—which is especially dangerous and damning to those who are perishing.
“Where the real Jesus saves us from our sins and offers us renewal in the image and furthers the likeness of God, the fake Jesus offers to make us comfortable in our skins, cozy with our sexual appetites and untroubled by having the central areas of who we are off limits to the interference of God,” he outlined.
“This comes under the historic categories of both blasphemy and heresy,” Ashendon continued. “It interferes with peoples’ salvation. It replaces faith in the Living Christ with pseudo-therapy. It is an abandonment of the heart of the gospel; and this is done by people who when they use the words ‘Jesus, holy, love and acceptance,’ have twisted the words to mean very different things from what the Church has always intended.”
God’s law reads in Deuteronomy 22:5, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.”

SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER CONCERNED AFTER HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT CLAIMS CHRISTIANS & MUSLIMS WORSHIP SAME GOD

 

SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER CONCERNED AFTER HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT CLAIMS CHRISTIANS & MUSLIMS WORSHIP SAME GOD

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2018/01/27/school-board-member-concerned-after-homework-assignment-claims-christians-muslims-worship-same-god/;

  

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 ELGIN, Ill. — “Do you know what your children are being taught: Muslims 

believe in the same God as Christians and Jews?” That’s the question a school 

board member in Illinois recently posted online after her daughter came home 

with an assignment that included an article claiming that Christians and Muslims 

worship the same God.

Jeannette Ward of the U46 School Board posted the text of the assignment to her social media page to show others the kinds of messages that are being presented to students, and to outline why she voted no on the curriculum the previous year.
“Judaism, Christianity and Islam are three of the world’s major religions. While they have many differences, they all believe in the same God,” the assignment read.
“In each religion, God is ‘revealed’ by a chosen messenger, called a prophet. Some of the prophets that Jews follow were Noah, Abraham and Moses. Christians follow these prophets too. They also think that Jesus was another prophet of the same God,” it stated. “Later, Muhammad founded Islam by declaring himself a prophet. He said he was the next in the same line of prophets. He also said that he would be the last.”

The article also claimed that Jews, Christians and Muslims simply assert that their teachings about that same God are the most accurate and that these groups have brought violence into the world by seeing others as being “beyond saving.”
“Muslims, Christians and Jews all worship the same complex God. But each religion believes that its books and teachings reveal the true nature of that God,” it read. “This disagreement has shaped the course of history. The followers of each religion believe that only they will be saved by God. They see all others as damned. This way of seeing people, as damned by God and beyond saving, has led to violence and hatred. It is why these religions both unite and divide.”
The assignment also included quiz questions that featured answers such as, “Judaism, Christianity and Islam believe in the same God; in all three religions, prophets revealed that God is complex and that only certain people will be saved by God.”

Ward became concerned about the lesson that her daughter, who is in the sixth grade, brought home from school as she called it “utterly incorrect and false on many levels.” Her post drew much discussion, and a number of clergymen have weighed in on the matter during the December and January U46 School Board meetings, including even just this past week.
One group of religious leaders stated that while they “sympathized” with Ward’s concerns about the article, they also disagreed with Ward’s “approach” in expressing concern.
“Each of us believes our own traditions are holy and true. Each of us also believes that each person, regardless of religious tradition is valued by God and is therefore worthy of dignity and respect,” they said in a joint statement. “We believe that honoring these holy teachings of our varied traditions means engaging in respectful dialogue and using care when exercising the responsibilities and privileges granted to us as leaders.”
Ward replied that she saw nothing wrong with her approach as she simply shared the assignment and advised others about what children were being taught in the district.
On Monday, a number of other clergy members and citizens spoke in support of Ward, stating that she should be commended for bringing the matter to light.
“To say that Allah of the Quran and the God of the Bible are the same is simply absurd,” said Art Ellingsen, founder of Talk 2 a Pastor, according to the Chicago Tribune.
“It’s not just something flying in the wind, it’s not just a political issue, it is a faith issue, and faith issues are very important to a lot of people in this community,” also said Mark Frusti of Faith Lutheran Church.
Frusti was one of 12 pastors who also submitted a letter to the board, which served as a response to the statement from the other clergy, and also a means of support for Ward.
“Without proper guidance, this type of article can do nothing but foster confusion and undermine the work of parents and faith leaders as those responsible for the spiritual health and wellbeing of our children,” they wrote. “For that reason, we strongly advocate for its removal from use within the curriculum.”
As previously reported, in 2016, then-Wheaton professor Larycia Hawkins drew concerns after she posted to social media a photo of herself wearing a hijab and claimed that she was doing so to stand in solidarity with Muslims.
“I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book,” Hawkins asserted. “And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God.”
Hawkins eventually left the college after controversy erupted, not about her hijab, but her assertion that Christians and Muslims worship the same God.
Some used the opportunity to outline why the concept is flawed in light of Scripture.
“Muslims hold that ‘God is one.’ Allah has no partners and assigning partners to him is shirk, the highest blasphemy,” explained Thabiti Anyabwile, pastor of Anacostia River Church in Washington, D.C., in a blog post for the Gospel Coalition. “Christians believe ‘God is one in three Persons.’ Each Person in the Trinity is fully and eternally God. Yet there is one God.”
He noted that as Muslims do not worship Jesus, who is God, Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God.
“No one knows God who does not know the Son, who is the only mediator between God and man,” Anyabwile said. “The goal of Christianity is the salvation of sinners through the righteousness, substitutionary atonement and resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

FEMINIST FALSE ALLEGATIONS DESTROYING WHAT'S LEFT OF AMERICA

 FEMINIST FALSE ALLEGATIONS DESTROYING WHAT'S LEFT OF AMERICA

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/feminist-false-allegations-destroying-whats-left-america/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Next to illegal immigration, feminism is the second-greatest seminal threat to American Independence.
My mentor Phyllis Schlafly often wrote about the Supremacists – of which feminists are the most entrenched and dangerous of all anti-American movements.   Feminism is the hub of Communism, Marxism, socialism, fascism, the Democrat Party, and the Communist Party in the United States.
The Communist Party USA is illegal under federal law but its platform operates openly under Democrat Party auspices.   In 2008, we elected a Communist president with fascist leanings.  Democrats seized 1/6 of the economy under the guise of National Health Care, made everyone wards of the federal government, and flattened our economy for eight long years.
Upon election, President Obama quickly gave interdisciplinary cabinet-level control of all departments to lesbians running the National Organization for Women, who dictated cabinet policy from the White House Office on Women and Girls (WOWG).  The feminist sexual revolution agenda was broadly forced upon other departments, most notably the military and education, sometimes enhanced by destructive Presidential orders and letters that are still operative today.
Fake rape statistics were used to take over college campuses.  “Star Chamber” administrative campus tribunals now apply phony definitions of sex abuse to kick men out college, while women have carte-blanche rights to slam down beer, do drugs, and sleep with anybody they want with no risk of repercussion.  “Microaggressions” established an unintelligible encyclopedia of punishable “patriarchal crimes”.
Feminists are well on the way to forcing everyone to live according to radical feminist dictaunder phony “Yes Means Yes” laws requiring men (even married men) to get permission to hold a woman’s hand (and everything beyond that) or be presumed guilty of a sexual offense. This law was sponsored by radical feminist Senator Claire McCaskill, and reflects her demand that men “shut the hell up” on a broad range of issues that are the sole domain of feminist Supremacists to manage.
Feminist harangues about sexual violence are as phony as Al Gore’s global warming agitprop.  Sexual violence has decreased 60% since 1995, with colleges being the safest place for women.  About half of rape allegations are false and many more unfounded.
When President Trump won the presidency in 2016, “nasty women” promptly declared “the future is feminist”.  That is exactly what liberals are doing right now.
I am here to warn everyone that feminists (who already broadly control levers of power in the swamp, media, education, law, and politics) are executing a coordinated takeover of the U.S. Congress, state governments, courts, and perches of economic power in business, media, and academics by hurling mostly-false sex allegations at men.
History has already proven this will win in 2018 regardless of the issues in each race.   Feminists have been perfecting their “Mother of all bombs” for over 130 years. 
The history begins in the mid-1880’s when the first feminists in the Women’s Ku Klux Klancommonly used false sex allegations against black men to drive discrimination and bloody mob lynchings (as documented in the movie Rosewood). Feminists then, as today, wanted a lot more than equality.  They got it by establishing dual standards based on extorted chivalry.
“The hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world” was the WKKK Supremacist motto. Divorces have thusly been won for over 100 years with Allred-style false child or adult abuse allegations hurled at men, up to 77% of which are false.
In his new book, “The Politics of Sex”, Stephen Baskerville describes how feminists are succeeding every day all over America:
“In the years following Tailhook the military was besieged with accusations of the same gender crimes now familiar in civilian life: rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment. When these produced too many acquittals, the rules were changed to ensure more convictions.”
This is precisely what is happening right now all over America.   Allegations take two minutes to make, are impossible to disprove in most cases, and often result in knee-jerk firing or expulsion of men.  The avalanche of accusations has crushed sanity and made case-by-case analysis impossible in the media.
Harvey Weinstein went way overboard and was quickly declared guilty.  Men who did nothing worth sneezing at often end up fired or pariahed because they are the same sex as Harvey Weinstein.  The feminist meat grinder wins because spitting out volumes of false allegations costs nearly nothing, while it is very expensive and perhaps impossible to prove innocence.
Feminists never mention how Elizabeth Taylor and other screen sirens wore out their casting couches.  They never talk about the epidemic of female teachers sexually abusing children in our public schools.
The vast majority of men destroyed by feminists did nothing that women were not happily doing alongside them at parties, in dressing rooms, offices, and everyplace else imaginable.  The results are vastly unequal: men get sacked while women get payoffs, a book deal, and pandering appearances on talk television.
Sex crimes are horrid life-destructive crimes – and so are false sex crime allegations.  Both should be punished with equal vigor.  But they are not.  Amidst the howling roar of the feminist rape riot, nobody dares mention serious collateral damage done to innocent men.    Everyone runs, ducks, capitulates, or hides – which is exactly what feminists want them to do.
This is big business.  Women were paid up to $750,000 to hurl accusations at President Trump.   Dark-money from George Soros and other political sources expose the real purpose of this Bolshevik revolution.
The list of men being destroyed is exploding faster than we can tally it.  Men fired on allegation alone are nearly always replaced by women.   Jeff Bezos is considering only women to replace the head of Amazon Studios.  Feminists are such a sexist threat that even liberal gay men are abandoning the feminist movement.
Time magazine exulted the Supremacist coup with a callous proclamation:
“These now disgraced men are not being replaced by women as an act of revenge, but because the women are the best candidates for the job. It’s promotion of the fittest. It’s evolution.”
This is a massive sexist violation of employment laws and mass persecution like never before witnessed in American history.
Feminists are quickly erecting city “takeover” Commissions similar to the “Yes Means Yes” campus tribunals.  Hollywood’s Commission on Sexual Harassment and Advancing Equality — headed by Anita Hill — says it all.  Women can get anything they want by dressing like Phyllis Schlafly and hollering “abuse”.  Sex abuse and female entitlement were muttered in the same breath when Oprah hinted an angry run for the presidency in 2020.
Liberals are experts at emotionally leveraging conservative principles against us.  Feminists hijacked the election from Judge Roy Moore.   Phony allegations of pedophilia froze conservative voters into staying home on election day because rational thinking dies when conservatives hear the serotonin-inhibiting words “sexual abuse”.  Spineless snowflakes running the RNC quickly abandoned Moore.  The Democrat turnout was 95% of 2016, but the Republican turnout a dismal 50%.
The sacking of Judge Roy Moore guarantees that political races in 2018 and beyond will be panopticons of sex allegations against men.
Politics has become so risky that many good conservative men are quitting politics.  A record number of 31 Republican Congresspeople – 26 of them men – will not seek re-election in 2018. Most of them cite family reasons.  Who dares risk the job, home, and family before a firing squad of feminists?
Democrats need flip only 23 seats in the House and one in the Senate to control Congress.   The wildly effective recent conquests of media and politics indicate this will be the Democrat’s nuclear weapon this fall and in 2020.
I suggest it is time for Rush Limbaugh to update his original definition of feminism: “Feminism Was Established So As To Allow Unattractive Women Easier Access To The Mainstream Of Pop Culture”.  It should be “Feminism was invented to empower Marxist sacrifice of nations before a pink pedestal of predatory chivalry”.
David R. Usher is President of the Center for Marriage Policy
__________________________________________________

 Feminists Want Total Family Destruction

 Alex Jones breaks down how the family unit is under attack and why the globalists want to see it dead.

 How Feminism Destroyed the Nuclear Family

 The patriarchal family unit was once accepted as the bedrock of civilization and essential for the raising of healthy children. But after centuries of sustained assault by feminist zealots, the family is in precipitous decline.

 Radical Feminism Vs Marriage: 
Why Marriage Matters

 The Inevitable Collapse of Feminist Societies

UN REFUGEE CHIEF SAYS EUROPE MUST PREPARE SYSTEMS TO COPE WITH BIGGER MIGRANT FLOWS

UN REFUGEE CHIEF SAYS EUROPE MUST 

PREPARE SYSTEMS TO COPE WITH 

BIGGER MIGRANT FLOWS

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/un-refugee-chief-says-europe-must-prepare-systems-to-cope-with-bigger-migrant-flows; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The hijrah continues to be escorted into Europe by the United Nations, which has signaled to Europe that whatever the price-tag, whatever the cost — including mass rapes, violent no-go zones, jihad attacks and other abuses — European citizens must accommodate Muslim migrants and expect more to flow in.

United Nations refugee chief Filippo Grandi has said that EU nations must prepare their asylum reception systems to cope with bigger migrant inflows.

The Visegrad group (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia) — especially Hungary and Poland — has resisted the hijrah, and have managed to “cut illegal immigration by 99 percent.” For this, the UN singled it out as being cruel in rejecting innocent people who were “fleeing war and persecution.” Yet that is questionable, and all the while Christians continue to be wiped out in the Middle East with nary a whisper from the UN.

“UN Refugee Chief Says Europe Must Prepare Systems to Cope with Bigger Migrant Flows”, by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, January 25, 2018:

United Nations refugee chief Filippo Grandi has said that EU nations must prepare their asylum reception systems to cope with bigger migrant inflows.
Speaking to Refugees Deeply in Davos, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said the “big failure” in Europe’s response to the migrant crisis in 2015 and 2016 was that governments visibly struggled to house, feed, and clothe the massive influx of third world migrants who marched on the continent after German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the border.
“We need to work more with Europe, and other countries that receive refugees, to make reception systems more effective for larger numbers than before,” he said, lamenting that migrant reception systems in the bloc had “cracked under the pressure” of huge inflows……
The Italian diplomat is not a fan of walls, as Breitbart London noted in September when Grandi blasted Hungary’s border fences for doing their job.
On a visit to the Visegrád nation’s border, where walls have cut illegal immigration by 99 per cent, the UNHCR boss complained: “When I was standing at the border fence today, I felt the entire system is designed to keep people, many of whom are fleeing war and persecution, out of the country.”
In the interview, which was published on Wednesday, Grandi also told Refugees Deeply co-founder and executive editor Lara Setrakian that Europe should speed up granting passports to refugees, claiming that the privileges of citizenship aid migrants’ integration.
For “wealthy states, especially European states”, resettling large numbers of refugees on a scale like that seen at the height of the migrant crisis is perfectly doable, he insisted.
“Of course it requires an effort. In the case of Europe, it also requires regional cooperation, something that is politically difficult,” the Milanese figure said, remarking that “European Commission leaders in Brussels” appear to be working along lines which would further UNHCR goals.
Breitbart London reported Thursday on EU migration commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos’s announcement that it would be “unacceptable” for any European nation to refuse the resettlement of third world asylum seekers, declaring that mass migration from Africa and the Middle East is part of the “principles and values” on which the bloc was built.

TRUMP STEALS THUNDER FROM DAVOS ELITE IN SWITZERLAND

 

TRUMP STEALS THUNDER FROM DAVOS ELITE

 Trump a Howard Roark-style American cowboy rebelling against powerful evil

BY KIT DANIELS

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/trump-steals-thunder-from-davos-elite/;

 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By his mere presence at Davos, President Trump is forcing EU leaders to make a dangerous attack on nation-states, a tremendous development given the mainstream media once claimed globalism was a “conspiracy theory.”

Once again Trump is forcing the power structure to react to him and his trademark nationalism, which reveals the inherent weakness of globalism: it only takes one man to act as a lion to defeat the sheep of a system designed by the Rockefellers and Rothchilds.

For decades, the globalists have gained control by selling the false idea that national identity still exists as they forged Europe into a superstate in which every nation is reduced to a vassal of an unelected bureaucracy.

But now, thanks to Trump, Brexit and the ongoing migrant crisis, average Europeans are starting to question why they’re losing their cultures and identities to the EU – and they look at Trump as a Howard Roark-style American cowboy whose undeterred rebellion against a legion of doom inspires their own individual thoughts and opinions.

This leaves the globalists in the untenable position to directly attack nationalism, but it’ll only backfire on them; the sparks of ideas have already ignited the minds of Europeans who’ve spent years living under decay, which they now realize is the direct result of globalism pushed by the very leaders who are smearing Trump.

In short, Europeans view Trump’s rebellion as much needed change.

Read this excerpt from the International Business Times:

On the eve of President Donald Trump’s visit to Davos, Switzerland, European leaders on Wednesday came together to warn the world about the perils of nationalism. European Leaders warned the World Economic Forum on the dangerous implications of slipping back to nationalism, while defending free trade, which president Trump has opposed, and encouraged global co-operation between nations.

This statement reeks of hypocrisy: you can’t have independent nations without a hint of nationalism, but the hypocrisy makes sense once you start thinking like a globalist.

For example, European globalists define “nations” as vassals of the EU. Just look up the definition of a vassal, then compare it with the headlines reporting how the EU is requiring migrant quotas on member countries.

And in another example of hypocrisy, the New York Times is now defending globalism barely a year after claiming it was a “conspiracy theory.”

But I thought globalism didn’t exist, @nytimes #tcot #Trump #hypocrisy pic.twitter.com/OIczRJCkWt

— Kit Daniels (@KitDaniels1776) January 24, 2018

From a Times article entitled Globalism: A Far-Right Conspiracy Theory Buoyed by Trump dated Nov. 14, 2016:

Those conspiratorial beliefs were bolstered when former President George Bush celebrated the end of the Cold War in a 1991 speech by saying it was the dawn of a “new world order.” His use of the phrase was taken as proof by many that a globalist conspiracy really was afoot.

“It was very easy for them, especially because he was the one who said it, to take that ball and run with it,” Mr. Pitcavage said. “From that point on, the phrase became the shorthand for that kind of globalism conspiracy theory.”

What a difference Trump’s first year in office made. Now the New York Times now admits globalism does exist because, like EU leaders, the mainstream media is forced to defend it.

Here’s a Nov. 22, 2018 article from the Times entitled Fox in the Globalist Henhouse? Davos Awaits Trump’s Arrival:

Mr. Trump, who is to arrive later this week, is drawing a mix of breathless anticipation, anxiousness and downright agitation among a crowd that has long considered him an outsider.

Davos has always been a playground for elites who believe in globalism, climate change and free trade. The cast of multinational leaders this year ranges from chief executives like Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase to philanthropists like Bill Gates and policymakers like Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor. Over the years, it has attracted artists like Bono and Matt Damon.

__________________________________________________

 FULL SPEECH: President Donald Trump Davos Speech 1/26/18

 President Trump addressed world leaders, chief executives, celebrities, and other global elites in a major speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The Davos conference is an annual gathering of around 2,500 of the most influential political and economic leaders from around the world. President Trump is expected to promote his "America First" policy at this gathering, which could be controversial given the pro-globalist bent of the Davos forum. Watch our LIVE COVERAGE of President Trump's Davos speech, including a pre-show and post-show where we read your comments live on the air.

 President Trump has Dinner with European Business Leaders, Davos, Switzerland

 

WOMAN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY SPORTS DOCTOR LARRY NASSAR PRESENTS GOSPEL IN VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT

 

 

WOMAN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY SPORTS DOCTOR LARRY NASSAR PRESENTS GOSPEL 

IN VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT 

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2018/01/25/woman-sexually-abused-by-sports-doctor-larry-nassar-presents-gospel-in-victim-impact-statement/;

 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 LANSING, Mich. — A former gymnast who had been sexually abused by sports 

doctor Larry Nassar when she was 15 presented the gospel on Wednesday in 

delivering her victim impact statement in court.

Rachael Denhollander was the first woman to speak out in 2016 after USA Gymnastics was accused of failing to properly handle sexual assault accusations lodged by young gymnasts, and she was also one of the last to have a say this week as Nassar was sentenced to 40 to 175 years in prison.
“Larry, you have become a man ruled by selfish, perverted desires. A man defined by his daily choices over, and over again, to feed that selfishness and perversion,” she said as she addressed Nassar during her 36-minute statement. “You chose to pursue your wicked desires, no matter what it cost others. The opposite of what you have done, therefore, is choosing to love sacrificially, no matter what it costs me.”
Denhollander noted that she had observed Nassar previously bring his Bible to court and that he had said that he had prayed for forgiveness.

“If you have read the Bible you carry, you know that the definition of sacrificial love portrayed in it is of God Himself loving so sacrificially that He gave up everything to pay the penalty for sin He did not commit. By His grace, I too, choose to love—no matter what it costs,” she said.
The 32-year-old, who is now married and works as an attorney, then warned Nassar that he must repent of his evil deeds.
“You spoke of praying for forgiveness, but Larry, if you have read the Bible you carry, then you know that forgiveness does not come by doing good things, as if good deeds can wipe out the incredible evil you have committed,” Denhollander outlined. “It comes from repentance, which requires facing and acknowledging the truth about what you have done, in all its utter depravity and horror. Without mitigation. Without excuse. Without pretending you can cover it with good things.”

“The Bible you carry says it is better for a millstone to be tied around your neck and you thrown into a lake than for you to make even one child stumble. And Larry, you have wounded hundreds of children,” she continued. “The Bible you carry speaks of a final judgment where all of God’s wrath, in all its eternal terror, is poured out on men like you. Should you ever reach the point of truly facing what you have done, the weight of guilt in the face of the horrific evil you committed, will be crushing.”
After explaining the consequences of sin, Denhollander presented the grace of the Lord as Christ took the place of undeserving sinners.
“And that is what makes the gospel of Christ so sweet. Because it gives hope and grace where none should be found,” she outlined. “And I pray you experience the soul-crushing weight of guilt someday, so that it can be followed by true repentance and forgiveness from God.”
According to reports, Nassar dabbed at his eyes during some of the victim impact statements that were delivered over the seven-day hearing, and other times he sat emotionless. Over 150 women who state that they were abused by Nassar while coming to him for treatment spoke during the sentencing hearing.

NEW JERSEY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHES "MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) IS THE LAST & FINAL MESSENGER OF GOD"

 

 

 VIDEO:

 NEW JERSEY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHES "MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) 

IS THE LAST & FINAL MESSENGER OF GOD"

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/new-jersey-public-school-teaches-muhammad-peace-be-upon-him-is-the-last-final-messenger-of-god;

 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

We have seen this all over the country, and in every case, the school officials insist that the school is simply teaching the tenets of Islam, not proselytizing for them. But it is noteworthy that public schools never seem to teach, say, that “Jesus is the Son of God and Savior of the world” without qualification. Whenever public schools teach about Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., they are careful not to teach what adherents believe as established fact. But when it comes to Islam, its tenets are being taught as established fact in public schools all over the country. There should be a federal investigation of this phenomenon, but of course, there probably will not be.

“Mom Says NJ School Assignment Recruited for Islam,” by Nick Rummell, Courthouse News Service, January 24, 2018:

NEWARK, N.J. (CN) – A New Jersey middle school that caught flak last year for requiring students to watch videos on Islam was hit Tuesday with a federal complaint.
Represented by the Thomas More Law Center, parent Libby Hilsenrath says a teacher assigned her 12-year-old’s seventh-grade class at Chatham Middle School to watch two videos at home with proselytizing messages.
The first video, “Intro to Islam,” is set to a musical version of a poem that describes “Christians and Jews as ‘infidels’ and prais[es] Muhammad in gruesome detail for slaughtering them,” according to the complaint.
Calling it a “conversion video,” Hilsenrath says the 5-minute assignment was “replete with biased, chastising statements encouraging the students … to follow the Quran and become Muslim.”
“Muhammad (Peace be upon him) is the last & final Messenger of God,” one such unqualified message in the video states.
In addition to presenting the religious teachings of Islam as facts, Hilsenrath says the video includes a link where students can download “Qaseedah Burdah,” the song with references to killing infidels.
Hilsenrath notes that the second video, an explanation of the five pillars of Islam, is a cartoon where a Muslim child explains the tenants of Islam to his non-Muslim friend, then ends with both boys walking off to “learn how to pray.”
“Due to the fact that these doctrinal messages calling for conversion to Islam were included in video format with vivid images and text, they possess greater communicative impact and are more likely to be accepted by the students viewing them than information that is spoken in a classroom or even written in a book,” the complaint states.
A worksheet component of the assignment meanwhile focused on the shahada, what Hilsenrath calls “the Islamic conversion creed and prayer.”
“Clearly, seventh graders were given a sugarcoated, false depiction of Islam,” the Thomas More Law Center said in a statement. “They were not informed of the kidnappings, beheadings, slave-trading, massacres, and persecution of non-Muslims, nor of the repression of women — all done in the name of Islam.”
Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the law center, issued a statement as well. “After watching this video, I can’t imagine any reasonable person saying this is not Islamic indoctrination,” he said.
Questioning why the curriculum for the Middle East and North Africa unit left out other religions, the complaint notes that “there are approximately 16 million Christians in the Middle East and approximately 6.4 million Jews living in the Middle East.”
Likewise the religious beliefs of Christianity are not covered in the unit on Latin America, a region that is 88 percent Christian, and Eastern religions are not covered in the unit on Southeast Asia, according to the complaint.
“Defendants assailed the First Amendment … by forcing children to endure the promotion of Islam in their public schools, including an explicit and direct call to the children for conversion to the religion of Islam,” the complaint states.
Hilsenrath says she and another parent emailed their concerns to school officials in early 2017. Fox News invited them to appear on Tucker Carlson’s show that February. The pair joined many other parents at a packed March 2017 open meeting of the Chatham school board.
School officials defended the curriculum at the meeting, saying it met the state requirements and that it was untrue that Islam was the only religion taught to seventh graders.
But Hilsenrath says the school’s conduct betrays hostility toward Christians. When confronted about the curriculum in January 2017, according to the complaint, Chatham’s social studies department chair sent an email where he linked to what he called a “priceless” clip from TV’s “The West Wing.” In the scene, the president character mocks a fundamentalist Christian about various tenants of the Old Testament, such as its endorsement of slavery….

______________________________________________________
THE VIDEOS FROM THIS ARTICLE:

 5 minutes Introduction to Islam

 The 5 Pillars of Islam; 1st Episode Animated 

IN ENGLISH.

 

Five Pillars of Islam taught in Public School

 

Islam and School Curriculum;

Bible Quote Not Allowed