ALEX JONES UNLOADS IN PATRIOTIC SPEECH AGAINST OBAMA'S SOCIALIST NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA

ALEX JONES OF INFOWARS.COM SLAMS OBAMA'S SOCIALIST POLICE STATE INCREMENTALLY CLOSING IN ON US AND DESTROYING OUR FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS PROBING FOR OUR WEAKNESSES, WHILE PASTORS REMAIN COMPLICITLY SILENT

Published on Aug 21, 2014

Alex Jones goes off on the police state taking place in Ferguson, Missouri and calls for liberty minded people to take a stand against such tyranny before it breaks out into civil war across the nation.

VIDEO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztmvREisRdU

America Has Surpassed North Korea In Open Abuse Of Press:

VIDEO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-xyRz74pig

ALEX JONES INTERVIEWS CHUCK BALDWIN & DR. GREG DIXON~ROMANS 13, 501C3, FEMA TRAINING OF PASTORS & THE SUPPRESSION OF TRUTH BY PASTORS

PASTORS ARE THE HIGH PRIESTS 

OF GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED CHURCHES

Pastors Call for Resurrecting 

The Black Regiment of Pastors 

Reminiscent of Colonial America

Published on Apr 5, 2013

On today's show, Alex speaks with former presidential nominee of the Constitution Party, co-author of Romans 13: The True Meaning of Submission and the founder and former pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Florida, Chuck Baldwin. Also, Alex welcomes Dr. Greg Dixon, a Baptist pastor who staged a peaceful protest against the IRS's para-military order.
http://biblicallawcenter.com/

Most Christian pastors today appear to have little in common with the preachers of yesteryear. For example, many modern clerics would probably be surprised to learn of the active role colonial preachers had in America's fight for independence. It is no hyperbole to say that had it not been for the activism of America's pulpits, our independence would never have been won and this nation would not even exist.

Until at least the Twentieth Century, it was well known that the Black Regiment was an intricate, even crucial, part of America's successful break with the Crown. However, only a handful of clergymen nowadays has any knowledge whatsoever of the Black Regiment. This is tragic!

The moniker "Black Regiment" is due to the habit of these patriot-preachers wearing distinguishing black robes in the pulpits. However, more than attire sets these preachers apart.

The Black Regiment was composed of men of various Christian denominations who courageously championed the cause of liberty and independence and who preached fervently and faithfully the message of redemption and Biblical authority. They were untouchable and indefatigable!

In the thinking and preaching of the Black Regiment, freedom and independence were precious gifts of God not to be trampled under foot by men, human authority was limited and particular and subject to proper divine parameters, and the soul and mind of man were never to be enslaved by any master save Christ Himself.

Membership in the Black Regiment was unofficial and without human oversight. Preachers of the black robes were found among Baptists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, German Reformed, Lutherans, Congregationalists, and others. They were young and old, loud and soft-spoken, rough and gentle, and urban and rural. They differed on secondary doctrines and never surrendered their theological distinctives. Yet, they formed an irresistible and unstoppable army that neither King George nor the demons of hell could match!

As one reads the colonial history of the United States, he or she must be struck with the observation that the American people, on the whole, seemed to appreciate the courage and independence of their preachers. Even America's early political leaders shared in this appreciation. http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/ 

CENTRALIZING GRIP OF COMMON CORE VIDEO BY THE ILLINOIS FAMILY INSTITUTE~PARENTS, TEACHERS TURNING AGAINST COMMON CORE

NEW VIDEO FROM 

THE ILLINOIS FAMILY INSTITUTE

The Centralizing Grip of Common Core

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ua9GXNhLrws

Surveys: Americans, Teachers 

Souring on Common Core

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/18951-surveys-americans-teachers-souring-on-common-core;

Aug 20, 2014
Common Core Is Crumbling Across the Nation

by Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana

http://gov.louisiana.gov/index.cfm?md=newsroom&tmp=detail&articleID=4653

BATON ROUGE – Across the country, support for Common Core is crumbling in many states. Multiple states have either repealed or delayed Common Core, and many states are debating whether to repeal or delay Common Core.

 

Three states have repealed the Common Core State Standards (South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Indiana), one state has delayed the standards (Pennsylvania), and 32 states introduced legislation against the standards (1 in 2013 and 31 in 2014). Several states have passed bills that establish commissions that can repeal or alter the standards in the near future.

 

Three states have delayed using Common Core aligned testing (Missouri, Massachusetts, and New York), 16 states have withdrawn or are in the process of withdrawing from one of the two testing consortia, and 28 states have introduced legislation against the testing consortia. Several states have had or are currently having legislative hearings on the tests.

 

Overall, over 80 pieces of legislation have been introduced against Common Core, the testing consortia or both. At least 10 Governors have issued Executive Orders against the standards, testing consortia or both.

 

Additionally, a recent poll by Education Next said teacher support for Common Core is souring. According to the poll, 76 percent of teachers supported Common Core one year ago, but the portion of teachers who support Common Core today has now declined drastically to 46 percent. Additionally, the number of teachers who oppose Common Core has more than tripled, moving from 12 percent up to 40 percent.

 

The breakdown of Common Core can be seen as follows:

 

Repealed:

•      South Carolina

•      Oklahoma

•      Indiana

 

Delayed:

•      Pennsylvania (2013)

 

States with anti-Common Core Legislation:

 

(All of these bills were anti-Common Core except where the topic is noted.)

•      Alabama

•      Arizona

•      Arkansas

•      Colorado

•      Florida

•      Georgia

•      Idaho

•      Illinois

•      Indiana

•      Iowa

•      Kansas

•      Kentucky

•      Louisiana

•      Maryland

•      Michigan

•      Minnesota (Data Privacy)

•      Mississippi

•      Missouri

•      New Hampshire

•      New Jersey

•      New Mexico

•      New York

•      North Carolina

•      Ohio

•      Oklahoma

•      Pennsylvania

•      Rhode Island

•      South Carolina

•      South Dakota

•      Utah

•      Tennessee

•      Texas (never adopted Common Core, but made it illegal in 2013)

•      West Virginia

•      Wisconsin

•      Wyoming

 

TESTING

 

Delayed Common Core Testing:

•      Missouri

•      Massachusetts

•      New York

 

Withdrawn/In Process of Withdrawing from CC Testing Consortia:

•      Alabama

•      Alaska

•      Arizona

•      Florida

•      Georgia

•      Indiana

•      Idaho

•      Iowa

•      Kansas

•      Kentucky

•      Louisiana

•      Oklahoma

•      Pennsylvania

•      South Carolina

•      Tennessee

•      Utah

 

All States with anti-PARCC/SBAC legislation:

 

(All bills ban use of PARCC or SBAC except where noted.)

•      Alabama

•      Arizona

•      Arkansas

•      Colorado

•      Florida

•      Georgia

•      Indiana

•      Illinois

•      Iowa

•      Kansas

•      Louisiana

•      Maryland

•      Massachusetts

•      Michigan

•      Missouri

•      Mississippi

•      New Hampshire

•      New Jersey

•      New Mexico

•      Ohio

•      Oklahoma

•      Pennsylvania (2013)

•      Rhode Island (establishes standards review commission and delays tests)

•      South Carolina

•      South Dakota (establishes review of test and standards)

•      Tennessee

•      Utah

•      West Virginia

•      Wyoming

 

Executive Orders against Common Core and Testing Consortia: 

 

(All were issued in 2013 except Connecticut, New Jersey and Louisiana, which were issued in 2014.)

•      Arizona

•      Connecticut

•      Florida

•      Georgia

•      Iowa

•      Oklahoma

•      Louisiana

•      Maine

•      Mississippi

•      New Jersey

 

FERGUSON POLICE THREATEN TO KILL MEDIA~"THUNDERSTRUCK" MISSOURI GOVERNOR PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ORDERING MILITARY EQUIPMENT FOR POLICE

Ferguson Riots Stoked by Media, 

Outsiders, Militants

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/18947-ferguson-riots-stoked-by-media-outsiders-militants;

Idiot Mainstream Media Calls for More Attacks on Protestors; Governor Surprised About the Use of Military Equipment?

SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=667nzgofj0Q

UNBELIEVABLE AGGRESSION BY POLICE

Ferguson Police Threaten to Kill Journalists; Photographer Grabbed & Thrown to Ground

Published on Aug 20, 2014

When the police in Ferguson decide they are done showing off their militarized outfits for the night, they demand compliance and submission, especially if you are a member of the press. The Police State is alive and well in Ferguson, MO.

Officer points gun at me and other media:

Hot Headed Cop Prepared To Murder Journalists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT92SFBv9TI

Ferguson Cop Suspended Following Threatening To Kill Press:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e1RE0ysnBg

Outside Provocateurs Causing Total Chaos in Ferguson, Mo:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqveat53afs

FERGUSON POLICE: WE CAN’T TELL YOU’RE 

A JOURNALIST UNLESS YOU 

HAVE A $50,000 CAMERA

Riot cops selectively enforce First Amendment

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/police-captain-journalists-without-50000-cameras-subject-to-detainment/

Ferguson Capt.: $50,000 Camera Makes You A Journalist, 

Still Won't Protect Your Rights

POLICE STATE: FEDS REACT TO MILITARIZED COPS IN FERGUSON~LAWMAKERS WANT TO STOP MILITARY EQUIPMENT GOING TO LOCAL POLICE

Lawmakers Want to End Transfers of 

Military Equipment to Police:

SEE: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/US-Police-Shooting-Missouri/2014/08/15/id/588910/;

EXCERPT: "U.S. lawmakers alarmed by the aggressive police response to protests in Ferguson, Missouri, are pushing for Congress to limit the Pentagon's ability to provide civilian police departments with military equipment such as armored vehicles designed for the battlefield."

Retired Marine Colonel Warns of Pending Police State; 

FEMA Classes Show Teaching That 

Founding Fathers Were Terrorists

“Unfortunately, the master-servant relationship that once had the government answering to ‘we the people’ has been reversed. Government agents now act as if they are the masters and we are the servants. Nowhere is this more evident than in the transformation of police officers from benevolent keepers of the peace to inflexible extensions of the military hyped up on the power of their badge.” (Quote from Attorney John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute).

The militarized response to protests and media coverage in Ferguson, Missouri has forced the federal government to rethink its policy of sending military hardware to police departments.

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/feds-react-to-militarized-cops-in-ferguson/
____________________________________________________________________

U.S. ARMY RELEASES ACTION PLAN FOR 

CIVIL UNREST DURING FERGUSON RIOT

Additional Effort To Nullify Posse Comitatus Law 

(Prohibiting Military Forces Being Used Against U.S. Citizens) 

By Creating Exceptions To The First Amendment 

of the Constitution

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-releases-action-plan-for-civil-unrest-during-ferguson-riot/

EXCERPTS: 

On Friday, as the disturbances in Missouri reached a crescendo, the Department of the Army released an innocuously titled document, 

ATP 3-39.33

SEE: 

http://armypubs.army.mil/doctrine/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/atp3_39x33.pdf

“The Constitution of the United States provides two exceptions for which the Posse Comitatus Act does not apply,” the ATP 3-39.33 document argues. “These exceptions are based upon the inherent right of the U.S. government to ensure the preservation of public order and to carrying out governmental operations within its territorial limits by force, if necessary.”

According to the Army the exclusions include a “sudden and unexpected civil disturbance, disaster, or calamity may seriously endanger life and property and disrupt normal governmental functions to such an extent that local authorities cannot control the situation” and the protection of federal property.

SEE ALSO:  

MILITARY SAYS NO PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORIZATION 

NEEDED TO QUELL “CIVIL DISTURBANCES”

http://www.infowars.com/military-says-no-presidential-authorization-needed-to-quell-civil-disturbances/;

EXCERPT FROM http://info.publicintelligence.net/DoD-CivilianLawEnforcement.pdf:

(3) When permitted under emergency authority in accordance with Reference (c), Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances because:

(a) Such activities are necessary to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order; or,

(b) When duly constituted Federal, State, or local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for Federal property or Federal governmental functions. Federal action, including the use of Federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect Federal property or functions.

On page 17 of the document, a number of different scenarios are listed under which the military is forbidden involvement, although the broader power of quelling domestic disturbances without presidential or congressional authorization is claimed.

In essence, this policy change seeks to supersede Posse Comitatus, the 1878 law which forbids the military from being involved in domestic law enforcement “except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.”

Under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the President may deploy armed forces domestically under extreme circumstances but Congress has to review the action every 14 days.

Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the President cannot commit troops to an armed conflict for a period longer than 60 days without an authorization from Congress of the use of military force or a declaration of war.

Under no circumstances in current US law is it legal for the military to deploy itself domestically without authorization from either the President, Congress or both.

In claiming this power, the Pentagon is effectively opening the door to a potential future military coup.

AND FROM U.S. ARMY MILITARY POLICE SCHOOL: 

"CIVIL DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS":

http://info.publicintelligence.net/USAMPS-CivilDisturbanceOps.pdf;

EXCERPTS:

In 2012 a U.S. Army Military Police training manual covering “Civil Disturbance Operations”detailed using military assets domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and possibly kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.

“The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under the guidance of U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which as we reported earlier this year, outlines how internees would be ‘re-educated’ into developing an ‘appreciation of U.S. policies’ while detained in prison camps inside the United States,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on July 6, 2012.