BACK TO SCHOOL-PREVENTING VACCINE BULLYING

BACK TO SCHOOL-PREVENTING VACCINE BULLYING 

BY Theresa K. Wrangham, Executive Director

SEE: https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/July-2018/back-to-school-prevent-vaccine-bullying.aspx;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

It’s July and many parents and college students are receiving their enrollment packages for the upcoming academic year. Families are also making new daycare decisions, or renewing daycare agreements.

As a parent, I have filled out my share of school enrollment packages and then mentored my adult children so that they could make their own decisions during the college enrollment process and beyond. I’ve both seen and experienced vaccine bullying, and I know first hand the importance of understanding vaccine policies and laws that govern the enrollment process.

This article provides timely vaccine resource information to assist our readers during enrollment and to prevent families and adults from being bullied into making vaccine decisions that do not align with their values and beliefs.

School Vaccine Requirements & Exemptions

NVIC receives numerous inquiries every year about school vaccine requirements and exemptions. School vaccine mandates (requirements) and exemptions vary from state to state because they are determined by each state’s legislature. You will need to understand the laws of your specific state.

State law also dictates how often school vaccine paperwork must be submitted, to whom that paperwork is submitted, as well as how personal vaccine information is shared with a state’s immunization information system (IIS), more commonly known as a vaccine registry.

State vaccine laws can also vary on which settings the law applies to, such as day care, K-12, and college, as well as whether or not the law applies to private schools. In Colorado, for example, the school vaccine law applies to day care facilities and private schools. Understanding how your state’s vaccine laws apply to a specific setting is helpful when completing enrollment documents.

Vaccine Requirements vs. Recommendations

Sadly, one of the stories often shared by parents with NVIC is that they have been incorrectly told by a school official, health care professional, or day care professional that all vaccines on the CDC’s recommended childhood schedule are required for enrollment. Exemption information is often not disclosed in these conversations. 

While there are some states and private institutions that do require all federally recommended vaccines as a condition of enrollment, the majority of states require fewer vaccines than the 69 doses recommended by the CDC from birth to age 18. Additionally, most states offer varying degrees of vaccine exemptions. NVIC provides an overview of the difference between a vaccine requirement and a vaccine recommendation that many readers have found helpful as they navigate school and day care enrollment requirements.

Vaccine Registries Track Vaccine Status

As parents make their vaccine choices, it is also wise to consider how privacy rights may be impacted by these decisions.

Many states have a vaccine registry that tracks the vaccination status of school children. More recently, federal policy and state laws are expanding registries to include adult vaccination status.1 Registries are often populated by data gathered from personal electronic medical records2 that health care professionals are incentivized to use by the federal government.3 4

The majority of state vaccine registries are opt-out, meaning you or your child’s vaccine information may already be in your state’s registry, and if you do not want to share that information, you must opt out. Unfortunately, some registries only allow opting out of data-sharing, and your health department may retain your information even after you opt out. NVIC’s state pages link to each state’s registry so that readers can learn about how data is acquired, discover if their personal vaccine information is in the system, and find out what opt-in or opt-out options are available and what information is retained when opting out.

Federal Privacy Rights Trump HIPAA

Often overlooked, or misunderstood, in the enrollment process is the difference between federal privacy rights conferred by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA)5 6 in the educational setting, and the “confidentiality” offered by state vaccine registries that are governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

FERPA protects records gathered by schools, inclusive of vaccine status information.7 Generally speaking, schools are prohibited from sharing personally identifiable information in those records without the specific written consent from the student’s parents or the adult student.8 However, not all schools are subject to FERPA and there are other exceptions that should be reviewed9 to more fully understand the privacy protections conferred by FERPA.

School vaccine information collected by other state agencies, such as the health department, is not protected by FERPA and may instead be subject to HIPAA.10 11 The primary difference between FERPA and HIPAA is that HIPAA allows information to be shared with third parties for public health related activities, without the consent or knowledge of parents and adult students.12 13 Again, we encourage our readers to take the time understand how data-sharing is governed under HIPAA prior to submitting school enrollment information to entities other than a school.

Additionally, NVIC is aware of tactics by state agencies, like those in Colorado, to circumvent FERPA14 through the introduction of legislation to change the law and allow health departments to gather school vaccine information for use in the state's vaccine registry. Abuse of authority and misleading families into giving their vaccine status information to health departments across multiple states has also been reported to NVIC. These types of activities are monitored on NVIC’s free Advocacy Portal to keep our readers informed on what is happening in their state and what actions can be taken to protect this sensitive medical information.

If you believe your FERPA rights have been violated, filing a complaint against a school is relatively easy, and must be filed within six months of the violation by the parent of the student, or the adult student.15

Any abuse of school vaccine laws should be brought to the attention of the agencies involved and copied to your state legislator asking for corrective measures. Please consider sharing this correspondence with NVIC so that we may further our advocacy efforts to protect and defend vaccine informed consent rights in your state.

Vaccine conversations unfolding in classrooms. 

More recently, NVIC has received emails from parents concerned about vaccine related curriculum being taught as early as elementary school.

Knowledge is power and talking to your child(ren) about vaccines is important, because the reality is that the vaccine conversation may already be taking place in the classroom, and it may lack balance and information on the ethical principle of informed consent.16 17 18 Mentoring children on how to identify reliable information and resources, and exercising their informed consent rights when making health care decisions will prepare them for the health care decisions they will face as adults.

College enrollment and getting information in advance.

In fact, some of the first health care decisions young adults must make are vaccination decisions related to college admission, with meningococcal vaccine being a focus of discussion for incoming freshmen.

NVIC provides reliable information on diseases and vaccines to assist young adults and parents who are navigating these waters for the first time. As college choices are weighed, many families have found it helpful to proactively:  

• research the state’s vaccine requirements and exemption laws as part of college selection process; 
• ask the admissions officer for the school’s vaccination and exemption policy in writing (should be on the institution’s letterhead), if it is not already available on the institution’s website; and
• ask if there are programs, such as nursing or other medical programs which require vaccination.

It is better to have this information in advance of deciding which college to attend so that there are no surprises when filling out the college enrollment paperwork.

NVIC is your go-to resource!

The good news is that NVIC’s website provides the public with the information and resources necessary to navigate the enrollment process. In addition, please consider the following tips:

• Be aware of the difference between a legal vaccine requirement and a recommendation to prevent bullying and coercion.
• Research the state vaccine requirements and exemption laws for your setting (day care, K-12, college, private institution) to understand requirements and exemption options and how they apply to your situation.   
• Research whether or not your state allows exemption from vaccination, or re-vaccination, if there is proof of immunity.
• If dealing with a private business or institution that is not required to follow state vaccine laws, obtain written documentation of the vaccine policy to prevent bullying and coercion in private settings.
• Understand the basics of FERPA and HIPAA and the privacy implications of your choices.

Vaccine requirements and exemptions change – stay informed

Some state laws permit health departments to add new vaccine requirements through administrative rule changes. There have also been numerous attacks on state vaccine exemption laws, as well as efforts to expand vaccine requirements.19 While vaccine mandates are determined at a state level, how vaccine requirements are implemented can vary.

The best way to know what is happening in your state and protect your ability to make informed, voluntary vaccine decisions is by registering for NVIC’s free Advocacy Portal. The portal provides links to contact your legislator, bill information and analysis, and talking points when legislation to expand or restrict vaccine freedom of choice is introduced so that contacting your legislator with your concerns is easy.

NVIC encourages our readers to use the resources discussed above, research and become knowledgeable of your rights, and join NVIC in protecting and expanding vaccine freedom of choice for children and adults now and in the future!
_______________________________________________________________

Schools Bullying Children Into Taking Vaccines!

Alex Jones talks with Dr. Edward Group about how you can detoxify your body and stay healthy. Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. we all want liberty. Find the free live feed at http://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jo...

Baylor's Doc Hotez Bullies Parents of Vaccine Injured Children by Barbara Loe Fisher

NVIC's co-founder and president, Barbara Loe Fisher, responds to bullying remarks made by Baylor University's Dr. Peter Hotez during a recent lecture at Duke University. Dr. Hotez accused NVIC of being a "hate group,” even though NVIC has consistently based its advocacy on the informed consent principle and served as a respected consumer watchdog monitoring vaccine science, policy, law and ethics. NVIC continues to respect all vaccine decisions, and advocates that all individuals should have access to accurate information on the risks associated with diseases and vaccines prior to vaccination and the human and legal right to make voluntary vaccine decisions for themselves and their minor children without coercion or sanctions.

Vaccination By Medical Bullying Creates Hostile Child With Sensory Processing Disorder

http://www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com - Megan took her very healthy unvaccinated 3 year old child in for a pediatric check up, was bullied into having her child vaccinated, and left with a vaccine injured child. The doctor called it “normal.” Her child was violently ill for days after the vaccination, and then she wound up with a persistent hostile/agitation that lasted for years; she was also diagnosed with a sensory processing disorder. Megan opposes mandatory vaccination and we hope you will too! Stop Mandatory Vaccination Produced by Larry Cook Founder and Director of http://www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com Contribute here: http://www.gofundme.com/ohwupg

IN SOUTH AFRICA, OBAMA OUTLINES GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR HUMANITY, SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST STYLE

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

http://time.com/5341180/barack-obama-south-africa-speech-transcript/

IN SOUTH AFRICA, OBAMA OUTLINES GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR HUMANITY

BY ALEX NEWMAN

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/29624-in-south-africa-obama-outlines-globalist-agenda-for-humanity?vsmaid=179&vcid=3987; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

As South Africa descends deeper into the “Second Phase” of Communist Revolution, former U.S. President Barack Obama swooped in to fan the flames of hatred and envy and to argue that the world should follow South Africa into the abyss. Paying homage to South African Communist Party bigwig Nelson Mandela on the 100th anniversary of his birth, Obama (shown) took swipes at President Donald Trump, his countrymen, free markets, the rich, and much more, pushing the globalist establishment's vision for humanity.

Obama's speech came amid growing fears of genocide against South African minority communities,  exploding poverty levels, the emergence of racist land-expropriation programs, and even the threat of civil war and societal collapse looming. Ironically, as the truth becomes more widely known, Obama's own words will likely condemn him and his idol Mandela. And indeed, across America, Obama was ridiculed and criticized for his comments — hoisted by his own petard.

Throughout his speech, Obama sought to divide the world into two opposing camps, further developing a narrative that has been pushed by the globalist establishment for at least several years now. The first camp described by Obama, guided by him and his oftentimes uber-wealthy associates under the banner of a mythical Mandela caricature created by establishment-media propaganda, supposedly seeks only to build peace, harmony, love, tolerance, justice, equality, “multi-racial democracy,” and all things nice. The other camp, led by “populists” and “strongmen,” by contrast, supposedly seeks a world full of hate, division, paranoia, conspiracy theories, war, greed, corruption, evil, and everything bad. “Let me tell you what I believe,” Obama said. “I believe in Nelson Mandela's vision.” Of course, he never accurately explained Mandela's vision — communist totalitarianism, by Mandela's own admission in his unsanitized auto-biography.

Without a hint of irony in his voice, after waging eight years of war against the constitutional republic created by America's Founding Fathers, Obama even claimed he shared the vision they articulated in the Declaration of Independence. “I believe in a vision of equality and justice and freedom and multi-racial democracy, built on the premise that all people are created equal, and they're endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights,” Obama claimed before and after taking swipe after swipe at the vision of genuine Christian liberty articulated by America's framers and enshrined in the nation's founding documents. In fact, Obama's globalist speech sought to undermine even the very notion of national independence, claiming that “the only way to effectively address problems like climate change or mass migration or pandemic disease will be to develop systems for more international cooperation.” More international cooperation is globalist-speak for surrendering more sovereignty to the United Nations. 

A number of critics suggested that Obama had metaphorically defecated — to use a more polite term — all over the United States and its people, along with Western Christian civilization more broadly. For instance, Obama preposterously suggested that “years of institutionalized oppression have created yawning disparities in income, and in wealth, and in education, and in health, in personal safety, in access to credit.” In reality, of course, the spread of Western Christian civilization and the freedoms associated with it brought unprecedented advances in income, wealth, education, health, personal safety, and access to credit to billions of people around the world. Any honest history book makes clear that before the advance of Western Christian civilization across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas, barbarism and poverty reigned supreme.

Throughout his speech, Obama also repeatedly and incorrectly claimed the United States was one of the world's “democracies.” In reality, America's founders were clear in their view that democracy was a horrible system of government. Instead, they expressed a desire to create a constitutional republic in which individuals' God-given rights were enshrined in law. As “Father of the Constitution” James Madison put it in The Federalist, No. 10, “democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.” A “republic,” he continued, “by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

Despite his flowery rhetoric in support of “freedom” and “democracy,” with his speech packed with soundbites on the supposed glories of “democracy,” Obama's true ideology and beliefs were easy to infer from the speech, and from his actions as president. And throughout his remarks, it was clear that Obama was promoting drastic changes in the direction of global governance. Among the key policies he promoted on more than one occasion, Obama echoed the rhetoric found in theUnited Nations Agenda 2030 “Sustainable Development Goals.” He argued, for instance, that “we're going to have to figure out how do we close this widening chasm of wealth and opportunity both within countries and between them.” That rhetoric is taken almost verbatim from the UN Agenda 2030, which in Goal 10 calls on all governments to “reduce inequality within and among countries.” In short, they are seeking national and international wealth redistribution.

The agenda goes far beyond just stealing wealth from the poor and middle-classes of the Western world and redistributing it to Third World kleptocrats who have kept their victims mired in poverty. As Obama put it in his speech, the ongoing “pace of change” around the world is “going to require us to do more fundamental re-imagining of our social and political arrangements.” Among the policies he proposed was a “universal income,” a scheme also known sometimes as a “universal basic income.” Essentially, the idea, which is being promoted by the globalist-minded Council on Foreign Relations and other key Deep State organizations, calls for making everybody dependent on government by having it hand out money to everyone — no strings attached. The radical plan has been hyped by former SEIU boss Andy Stern, who served on the Council on Foreign Relations' Trade Task Force, as well as Bilderberg attendee and far-left “economist” Guy Standing. Obama also touted the Rothschild dynasty-backed scheme of “inclusive capitalism.”

Of course, Obama's proposed system of global governance would involve “some form of progressive taxation,” a key plank in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto that has been normalized in much of the West. The reason why “progressive taxation” is needed is “to make sure that everybody else has something to pay for universal health care and retirement security, and invests in infrastructure and scientific research that builds platforms for innovation.” In other words, under Obama's vision, government would take over your healthcare, your retirement, as well as research and development — and much else too. Ironically, one of the key themes of Obama's speech was inequality. What he did not say was that, since Apartheid ended and Soviet-backed communists took over, inequality and poverty have exploded far beyond the levels that existed under the previous regime, making South Africa one of the most unequal societies on earth. Average life expectancy has plummeted more than 10 years under the new regime, according to UN data.

And yet, Obama repeatedly hailed Mandela and his takeover of South Africa as a model for the world to emulate. Indeed, his entire plan for the “road ahead” was centered around various “guideposts that draw from Madiba's work, his words, the lessons of his life.” "First, Madiba shows those of us who believe in freedom and democracy we are going to have to fight harder to reduce inequality,” Obama continued. “Second, Madiba teaches us that some principles really are universal — and the most important one is the principle that we are bound together by a common humanity.” What Obama did not say: Mandela was a communist terrorist (placed on the U.S. terrorist list by Ronald Reagan) who led the Soviet-backed, Communist Party-controlled African National Congress's terrorist wing and was convicted of 193 counts of terrorism committed between 1961 and 1963, crimes that included manufacturing and using explosives in a campaign that slaughtered thousands of innocents. Mandela's original autobiography manuscript promoted violence, terror, and communism before being sanitized by one of Obama's officials.

Obama was also clear about what he opposed. For instance, he blasted “populist movements” as a backlash against the inevitable forces of progress and globalization, and suggested that those involved in fighting back against big government, globalism, and open borders were merely pawns being “cynically funded by right-wing billionaires intent on reducing government constraints on their business interests.” He also lambasted people who hope to secure their borders and maintain their nations, liberties, and self-government, suggesting that everyone who opposes his agenda was a vile racist living in the past. On multiple occasions, Obama lashed out at what he described as “strongman politics,” which virtually all analysts said was a veiled attack on President Trump and other leaders Obama hates. It seems Obama's speechwriters forgot that it was Obama, not Trump, who vowed to bypass Congress and impose his agenda on unwilling Americans using his “pen” and “phone.”

Critics slammed Obama after the speech, though. Writing in Townhall, for example, prominent Cuban-American commentator Humberto Fontova ridiculed Obama's criticism of “strongman politics” by examining some of Mandela's own heroes — especially mass-murdering Communist dictator Fidel Castro and his regime's mass-murdering chief executioner, racist extraordinaire Ernesto “Che” Guevara. Mandela claimed that Che Guevara, who executed thousands of alleged “counter-revolutionaries” after sham trials or no trial at all, was an “inspiration for every human being who loves freedom.” “The cause of communism is the greatest cause in the history of mankind!” Mandela also said, despite having lied about his membership in the SACP all his life. The South African revolutionary also claimed Fidel Castro “stands out head and shoulders above the rest” in his supposed “love for human rights and liberty!”

Ironically, Obama and other self-styled “progressives” in the United States and other Western countries like to tout Mandela and his Soviet-backed communist revolution in South Africa as a model for America to emulate. But Fontonova highlighted the facts. “For all its faults, in its record of repression, Apartheid South Africa couldn’t hold even a teenzy-tiny candle to the regime co-founded by Mandela’s idols Fidel Castro and Che Guevara,” he explained. “Mandela himself provides the perfect proof. You’d never guess it from the international hoopla regarding his imprisonment, but before his imprisonment (for communist terrorism,) Mandela enjoyed a bona-fide day in court with civilized standards of jurisprudence and under a judge who was not beholden to a dictator for his job (or his life.)” Of course, Mandela and his ANC were also vigorous supporters of the mass-murdering communist strongmen enslaving the Soviet Union, China, Libya, Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and countless other nations.

Despite occasionally using language familiar to Americans, it should be abundantly clear that Obama's vision is completely alien to everything America's founders held dear: Individual liberty, God-given rights, limited government, Christian civilization, and more. Obama's attacks on social media for helping to promote “paranoia” and “conspiracy theories” suggest that even the most fundamental Western values such as free speech would not survive in the utopia he and his comrades envision. As this writer and others have documented extensively in a book and a series of articles (see below) over a period of many years, Obama and Mandela share a deep bond — and that bond includes a desire to overthrow Western Christian civilization and all of the God-given liberties that Americans enjoy. And unfortunately, while Obama may be out of office and Mandela may be gone, the international Deep State network that built them up and put them in power remains firmly in place. Americans must get involved, or lose it all.

Related articles:

Original Mandela Autobiography Advocates Violence, Communism

South African Communist Party Admits Mandela’s Leadership Role

“Saint” Mandela? Not So Fast!

Secession Push Grows as South African Regime Plots Land Thefts

World Finally Notices Plight of South Africa's Minority Farmers

Genocide and Communism Threaten South Africa

South Africa’s Turn to Communism Exposed in U.S. by AfriForum

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism

New Film Exposes Takeover of South Africa by Communist Terrorists

Warnings Grow Over Communism and Genocide in South Africa

What Americans Must Learn From South Africa's Tragedy

South Africa Enters “Second Phase” of Communist Revolution

South African Regime Embraces Chinese Communism, New World Order

In Death, as in Life, Truth About Mandela Overlooked

_______________________________________________________________

COMMUNISTS HOLD HANDS

Say cheese: BRICS members family photo op in South Africa

Leaders of the BRICS emerging economies - Brazil, China, India, Russia and South Africa - arrived for the second day of the annual summit on Thursday, held this year in Johannesburg.

YOUTUBE'S BANNING OF CRITICIZING RADICAL ISLAM IS HERE

YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP 

THE BANNING OF CRITICIZING RADICAL ISLAM IS HERE 

Infowars has unfairly been hit with community guidelines strikes on videos that are critical of Islam. Other conservatives are experiencing the same censorship as leftists continue to strangle free speech.

TRUMP INITIATES TRADE DEAL WITH EUROPEAN UNION

TRUMP INITIATES TRADE DEAL WITH EUROPEAN UNION

MAD MAXINE WATERS: "I'VE BEEN SENT BY GOD TO GET TRUMP"~WHEN POLITICS BECOMES RELIGION: SHE VIOLATES FEDERAL TAX LAW TO SLAM TRUMP IN CHURCH

DOING SATAN'S WORK 
IN THE NAME OF GOD
SEE: http://www.famechurch.org/
(323)735-1251

APOSTATE USURPS PULPIT

1 Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

1 Corinthians 14:34 - Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

MAD MAXINE WATERS: "I'VE BEEN SENT BY GOD TO GET TRUMP"~WHEN POLITICS BECOMES RELIGION: SHE VIOLATES FEDERAL TAX LAW TO SLAM TRUMP IN CHURCH

Maxine Waters claims she is sent by God to get Trump impeached. Democrats revealed their hypocrisy when Obama used the IRS to persecute churches that support traditional values.

Maxine Waters Claims God Sent Her to Get Donald Trump

BY JOSHUA CAPLAN

SEE: https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/25/maxine-waters-claims-god-sent-her-to-get-donald-trump/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) on Sunday told congregants of the First AME Church in Los Angeles that God has sent her to take on President Donald Trump.

Waters began her tirade by accusing the president of being intent on “taking America down,” rather than living up to his 2016 presidential slogan of “Make America Great Again.”

“I am in this fight,” Waters declared before claiming her political opponents are waging an effort to “intimidate,” and “frighten,” her. During a June 30 speech in Los Angeles to demonstrators protesting President Trump “zero-tolerance,” immigration policies, the California lawmaker warned her enemies “better shoot straight,” if they are going to confront her. “No, we have members of Congress trying to intimidate me,” Waters said. “I have no fear. I’m in this fight. I know that there are those who are talking about censuring me, talking about kicking me out of Congress, talking about shooting me, talking about hanging me. All I have to say is this, if you shoot me, you better shoot straight. There’s nothing like a wounded animal.”

Waters told congregants she is not backing down from resisting the Trump administration’s policies despite calls from Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to tone down her violent rhetoric. “I’ve said that we can walk and chew gum at the same time,” she said.

Waters was roundly criticized after calling on her supporters to “create a crowd,” and “push back,” against Trump administration officials over its border policies. “You tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,”  the Congressional Black Caucus member said while speaking in front of Los Angeles’ Wilshire Federal Building.

The California Democrat in June told MSNBC she has “no sympathy,” for Trump administration officials who have been subjected to public harassment. “They tend to not want to confront this president or even leave, but they know what they’re doing is wrong,” Waters said. “I want to tell you, these members of his cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they won’t be able to go to a restaurant, they won’t be able to stop at a gas station, they’re not going to be able to shop at a department store. They’re going to protest. They’re absolutely going to harass them until they decide that they’re going to tell the president, ‘No, I can’t hang with you,’” she added.

The 79-year-old lawmaker concluded her speech claiming God anointed her to help lead the fight against the Trump administration. “You’ve gotta know that I’m here to do the work that I was sent to do, and as pastor said to me when I came in this morning, when God sends you to do something, you just do it!” she exclaimed. “So I have a message I’m going back to Washington tomorrow morning, I’m going to tell them pastor told me to come here and just do it!”
________________________________________________________________

'Crazy Auntie' Maxine Waters Says She Is 'Sent By God' To Take Out President Trump

The line between having Trump Derangement Syndrome and actual mental illness is a fine one to be sure, but 'Crazy Auntie' Maxine seems to have crossed it. And by a fairly wide margin I would have to say. Speaking at the First AME Church in Los Angeles this past Sunday, Maxine Waters went into a long, rambling and at times incoherent diatribe against Donald Trump, which wound up by saying that she was 'sent here by God' to take out President Trump. READ MORE: http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/congre...

Larry Klayman: The American People Must Rise Up To Defend President Donald Trump

Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch joins Alex Jones live via Skype to call upon patriotic Americans to support Citizens' Grand Juries that can be used to defend President Donald Trump.

MAXINE WATERS REJECTS OCASIO-CORTEZ: DEMOCRATS ‘NOT A SOCIALIST PARTY’

Latest Dem leader to turn against far-left candidate

BY JAMIE WHITE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/maxine-waters-rejects-ocasio-cortez-democrats-not-a-socialist-party/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has piled on against rising New York socialist candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, rejecting the notion the Democratic Party should move far-left for the 2018 midterms and beyond.

“The Democratic Party is not a socialist party,” Waters said in an interview at CNBC’s Capital Exchange event Wednesday.

“I just don’t think our party should be identified because we have a few people who seem to be to the left of the left.”

The top Democrat is the latest leader of her party to voice anxiety over Ocasio-Cortez, along with Senate Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who denied a rise of socialism within the party after No. 4 Democrat Joe Crowley (D-NY) was defeated by the socialist bartender-turned-politician last month.

“It’s ascendent in that district perhaps,” she said of New York’s 14th congressional district, where Ocasio-Cortez won. “But I don’t accept any characterization of our party presented by the Republicans. So let me reject that right now. Our party is a big tent, our districts are very different, one from the other.”

“They made a choice in one district. Let’s not get yourself carried away,” she added. “It is about that district.”

Several other Democrats also expressed their discontent with Ocasio-Cortez’s debut into their party ahead of the midterms, with some saying her platform would “bankrupt the country.”

“Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is a proud member of the Democratic Socialists of America, whose platform, like hers, is more Socialist than Democratic,” Democrat-turned-independent Joe Lieberman wrote last week.

“Her dreams of new federal spending would bankrupt the country or require very large tax increases, including on the working class.”

Other Dems blamed the growing wedge between moderates and the far-left on the media’s fawning of the socialist neophyte.

“In some ways the media has pushed the young woman who was victorious in the New York congressional race against Joe Crowley to the point that she is being made out as some kind of deity,” Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver (D-MO) said on Fox News Wednesday.

Of course, the Democrat Party of today is far-left in everything but name.

Many traditionally moderate lawmakers like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have adopted the far-left’s “Abolish ICE” platform, and other leaders like DNC Chairman Tom Perez admitted socialists like Ocasio-Cortez were the “future of the Democratic Party” in part because they champion universal healthcare and free college tuition for all.

---

Twitter: 

Waters: Scream in the Streets Against Trump; 

“Make Something Happen”

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29647-waters-scream-in-the-streets-against-trump-make-something-happen?vsmaid=233&vcid=3987;

EXCERPTS: 

"As if she hadn’t done enough to encourage rage and violence in the streets, Representative Maxine Waters (shown), the leftist from California, is now calling for her stormtroopers to hit the streets and start screaming.

The mouth from South Los Angeles County told CNBC’s John Harwood she wants “racist” President Donald Trump impeached and that Trump won’t intimidate her.

Breitbart.com has compiled a list of “538 Acts of Media-Approved Violence and Harassment Against Trump Supporters.”"

TRUMP CONSIDERS REVOKING SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR BRENNAN & OTHERS

TRUMP CONSIDERS REVOKING SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR BRENNAN & OTHERS 

BY STEVE BYAS

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/29616-trump-considers-revoking-security-clearances-for-brennan-and-others?vsmaid=154&vcid=3987; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

“John Brennan leaked information that almost cost the life of a double agent,” Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told Martha MacCallum of Fox News’ The Story Monday night, explaining why he asked President Trump to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan.

At Monday’s press briefing, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders announced that Trump, after meeting with Paul, is “exploring mechanisms” to revoke not only Brennan’s security clearance, but also those of other figures in the U.S. intelligence community who have, in her words, “politicized and in some cases actually monetized their public service and their security clearances in making baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia.”

Sanders named former FBI Director James Comey; former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe; former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper; former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, and former CIA Director Michael Hayden, in addition to Brennan, as individuals who can no longer be trusted with a security clearance.

She argued that allowing these individuals to keep their clearances will give “inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence. When you have the highest level of security clearance … when you have the nation’s secrets at hand, and go out and make false [statements], the president feels that’s something to be very concerned with.”

Paul told MacCallum that Brennan “should not get within 10,000 yards of the government. He should have a restraining order.” He specifically said that Brennan should have been “fired” for risking the life of a double agent.

“But he wasn’t fired by President Obama because I think he was a partisan,” Paul charged. “But now he’s a talking head on the outside, basically saying President Trump should be executed — that’s what we do for treason.”

Last week, in the aftermath of the president’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Brennan called Trump’s remarks “treasonous,” adding that he “is wholly in the pocket of Putin and that his performance exceeded the threshold for impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors.”

“And so, yeah,” Paul said, “I’m very concerned about him having privileges because of his past history.”

Brennan’s past history includes voting for the Communist Party when Brennan was in college, and Paul noted, “You know, John Brennan started out his adulthood by voting for the Communist Party presidential candidate. He’s now ending his career by showing himself to be the most biased, bigoted, over-the-top, hyperbolic, sort of unhinged director of the CIA we’ve ever had, and it’s an insult to everything about our government to have a former head of the CIA calling the president ‘treasonous’ just because he doesn’t like him.”

The Founding Fathers made “treason” the only crime specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution, as they knew that the charge — punishable by death, as Paul said — had been used so loosely in history by tyrants. It is doubtful that James Madison and other delegates to the Constitutional Convention would have regarded a president daring to question the conclusions of intelligence officers as fitting into that narrow definition. That such a charge is made by a man — Brennan — who once supported the head of the U.S. Communist Party (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Soviet Communist Party) is surreal.

Brennan told the Congressional Black Caucus in 2016 that he had supported the communist candidate as a way “of signaling my unhappiness with the system, and the need for a change.” It should be noted that at the time Brennan voted for the Communist Party candidate, the dictator in the Soviet Union was Leonid Brezhnev, who sent tanks into Czechoslovakia in 1968, and eventually invaded Afghanistan in 1979.

Just what type of change was Brennan seeking in 1976?

What type of change is Brennan seeking now? He was named CIA director by President Obama, who had pledged to bring about the “fundamental transformation” of America, and apparently did not want Donald Trump to provide a roadblock to that change by keeping Hillary Clinton out of the White House.

After Trump was elected, Brennan went to work for NBC News and MSNBC as an intelligence analyst — and thus Sanders’ charge that Brennan was “monetizing his public service.”

But Brennan is not the only person cashing in on their ties to the Obama White House, as Sanders charged. Former CIA Director Michael Hayden and Condoleezza Rice are also frequent guests on cable shows, regularly castigating President Trump. Hayden defiantly responded in a tweet that a loss of a security clearance “won’t have any effect on what I say or write.”

The idea of removing the security clearances of intelligence officers such as Brennan and Hayden did not originate with Paul. For example, Fox News host Tucker Carlson within the past week referred to Brennan as an “out-of-the-closet extremist” with a “documented history of dishonesty,” who should not have a security clearance. But Paul was the highest-ranking public official to say so — until Trump agreed with him.

Contradicting the oft-repeated accusation that Trump “colluded” with Putin to steal the election from Clinton, investigative journalist Sarah Carter, appearing on Fox News, agreed with Trump’s action in revoking security clearances for Brennan and the others, asserting, “U.S. intelligence agencies were weaponized to affect the outcome of a U.S. election.” While charges of foreign interference in a U.S. presidential election is serious, the use of the American intelligence community to favor one candidate (Clinton) over another (Trump) should concern every American.

But what will be done to counter this assault on our Constitution by politicized intelligence agencies? As Jason Chaffetz said to Sean Hannity of Fox News, a huge problem in putting a stop to this serious problem is the “non-existent” attorney general, Jeff Sessions. “Until Trump puts in an attorney general who will do his job, the Deep State will continue.”

At least Rand Paul and Donald Trump are fighting back.

_____________________________________________________________

President Trump Is Considering Revoking Security Clearances Of Former Intelligence Officials 

TIME: President Donald Trump is considering revoking the security clearances for a half-dozen former high-level intelligence and national security officials who have "criticized" him, the White House said Monday afternoon.

TREASONOUS ATTACKS, THREATS, LEAKS, DISRUPTION, FRUSTRATION OF TRUMP AGENDA THE REAL REASONS

Trump Is Revoking Security Clearances 

To Stop The Leaks

The deep state is running scared as Trump moves against their agenda to smear him. The Media is also promoting propaganda like a letter to the Editor to Execute Trump.

Trump Pulls Security Clearance Of Globalist Traitors

Clapper, Brennan, and Comey are about to lose their security clearance. Trump is exposing globalists' world government plan to be above the law and tax exempt while keeping the general population poor.

Former FBI Agent Reveals Deep State 

Supports Islamic Jihad

Former FBI agent John Guandolo joins Alex to discuss how John Brennan secretly converted to Islam according to eyewitness accounts. The American people are being misled about the loyalties of those that run the deep state.

'It's All a Deflection': Pelosi, Dems Slam Trump for Considering Revoking Security Clearances 

Nancy Pelosi slammed President Trump for considering revoking the security clearances of several top Obama-era intelligence and law enforcement officials.

EXPOSED: EPA’S SECRET AGREEMENT WITH UN TO CONTROL YOU

EXPOSED: EPA’S SECRET AGREEMENT WITH UN TO CONTROL YOU 

Alex Newman on the EPA’s conspiracy with the UN, the State Department & the National Security Council to control every aspect of your life using the pretense of environmentalism.