Translate

Thursday, May 3, 2018

BRITISH TYRANNY: HOUSE OF LORDS TRIES TO BLOCK BREXIT

 
HOUSE OF LORDS TRIES TO BLOCK BREXIT 
BY STEVE BYAS
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28949-house-of-lords-tries-to-block-brexit; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The globalists are not going away quietly in England. The British House of Lords inserted an amendment on Monday evening to the EU Withdrawal Bill, designed to give Parliament the power to block Britain from leaving the European Union without a “deal,” or even forcing Prime Minister Theresa May to negotiate a deal before consummating the United Kingdom’s divorce from the EU. The vote was 335-244.
“It is not acceptable for an unelected house to try to block the democratic will of the British people,” Liam Fox, international trade secretary, told BBC Radio 4’s Today. Fox was one of the strongest supporters of Brexit during the 2016 campaign, which eventually resulted in a popular referendum among the British people to terminate their membership in the EU.
What such a requirement could lead to, Fox warned, was the possibility of “delaying exit from the EU indefinitely.” Fox insisted that the option of “leaving the EU without an agreement” had to be kept on the table, for otherwise, the blockage of a “deal” between the EU and the U.K. could be used to thwart Brexit altogether. Fox said it was time to have a “big debate” on whether an “unelected house” [the House of Lords] could “thwart the view of the British electorate.”
The amendment in the House of Lords was proposed by Viscount Hailsham. It would provide that Parliament would determine what the government did if Parliament rejected the final agreement, or if the government proved unable to reach a deal at all with the EU. Hailsham told the House of Lords that the principle of parliamentary sovereignty was “fundamental to our liberties and must not be betrayed” when it came to Brexit.
This seems almost to be what British author George Orwell termed doublespeak. During the long tenure of EU membership, the British Parliament was growing increasingly less sovereign, and increasingly redundant. More and more laws were being dictated in Brussels by an unelected elite, leaving Parliament with less sovereignty with each passing year.
Legally, the lords — who are all appointed, not elected — are unable to prevent bills from being enacted, but they can delay the passage of bills, forcing the House of Commons to reconsider. While the lords cannot “thwart the view of the British electorate,” any delay in the enactment of a bill passed by the Commons could theoretically lead to the members of the Commons to change their original vote.
It does not appear that the ruling Conservative Party government in the House of Commons is inclined to defer to the House of Lords in this matter, however. Prime Minister Theresa May reacted to the vote in the House of Lords strongly, saying that the government’s response will be “robust.” A spokesman for the prime minister told reporters that the Cabinet had expressed “strong disappointment” with the action of the lords, reiterating their support for Brexit. “We wish for the bill to go through in the same way it left the Commons.”
The prime minister met with her Cabinet early Tuesday morning, and charged that the action of the lords risked tying the hands of the May government in negotiations with the EU. The government expects to persuade members of Parliament to strike the lords’ change when the bill returns to the Commons later this month.
But it does give Brexit opponents more time to create opposition to what the British people voted on less than two years ago, something some party leaders advocate. Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn favored substituting the will of Parliament for the will of the British people: “Parliament must be sovereign on this matter and make the final decision.” Corby said the vote by the lords was a “hugely significant moment,” and he still hoped Parliament would have a “proper role” in the Brexit negotiations.
Some in Britain have advocated that the country should join some sort of customs union with the EU once Brexit is completed. Fox, however, strongly opposed that option. “No, I don’t think we can stay in the customs union for a number of reasons, the main reason being that we would be in a worse position that we are today. If we were in a customs union with the European Union we would have to accept what the EU negotiated in terms of market access to the U.K. without the U.K. having a voice. I don’t think there is a customs union that could ever be acceptable.”
Lord Howard, a former leader of the Conservative Party, also weighed in against what the House of Lords did. He told the BBC’s Daily Politics show that the lords were “playing with fire,” and the action Monday night “reveals the appalling lengths to which the die-hard Remainers are prepared to go to achieve their aims.”
The May/June edition of Foreign Affairs, the official publication of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), expressed concern that “democracy” was dying in Europe and in America. But in the examples offered, it would appear that their concern is that the general population is not going along with the goals of the globalist elites. (They were particularly concerned at the election of Trump, Brexit, and the growing opposition in Europe to immigration.) The British people voted to leave the globalist European Union, but this “democratic” decision of the people of the United Kingdom is clearly not respected by the CFR, or by their globalist allies in Britain.

HOMESCHOOLERS TURN OUT IN DROVES TO DEFEAT INTRUSIVE CALIFORNIA BILL

HOMESCHOOLERS TURN OUT IN DROVES TO DEFEAT INTRUSIVE CALIFORNIA BILL
BY MICHAEL TENNANT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Don’t mess with homeschoolers: That’s the lesson California lawmakers, like their counterparts in Hawaii, learned last week when hundreds of homeschoolers and their allies descended upon Sacramento in opposition to intrusive legislation — and won.
At issue was a bill sponsored by Assemblyman Jose Medina, a Democrat, that “would have categorized the type of school on a form filed by private educators. One of the categories was homeschools. The state considers homeschools as private schools when it comes to state regulation,” reported GVWire.
According to The Desert Review, Medina’s bill originally would have required local fire marshals to inspect the abodes of homeschooling families, a provision that was deleted in part because “firefighters objected to this sweeping new job requirement.” Then the bill was amended to “mandate state disclosure of the names and addresses of homeschool families.” Opposition continued to mount, and just before last Wednesday’s education committee hearing on the bill, Medina removed that provision, though he “insisted that the state needed to gather more data on homeschoolers.”
Homeschoolers prefer their privacy, however, so they trekked to Sacramento to inform their elected representatives. According to GVWire, “lines to speak wrapped around two floors of the Capitol and out the door.” The Desert Review noted that the bill’s “opponents included a number of professionals, state-credentialed teachers, and self-described progressives and liberal Democrats.” Over the course of three hours, nearly 1,000 people told the committee in no uncertain terms to kill the bill. Only two people spoke in favor of it.
Medina claims he was motivated to introduce the legislation by the case of David and Louise Turpin, constituents of his who are accused of holding their 13 children captive and torturing them, claiming they were homeschooling the children. “When the Turpin case happened,” he said, “I, like many others in my district … looked in the law, looked for what may have been able to be done to avoid that incident.”
But as Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, a Republican member of the education committee, pointed out, the Turpin case was “an extreme outlier” and not the sort of incident on which policy should be based. He also asked Medina what problem in the homeschool community his bill would solve, forcing Medina to admit not only that his bill was “not an attempt to solve a problem with homeschooling” but also that, when it comes right down to it, he “do[es] not see a problem with the homeschool community at all.”
Republican Assemblyman Travis Allen, who is running for governor, declared in the hearing that the bill “is absolutely wrong. It must fail. It must fail today.”
At the end of the debate, “Medina made a last-ditch plea for the bill by invoking James Madison,” reported The Desert Review. “The irony was not lost on listeners aware of the fact that homeschooling was the norm during the founding era.”
When it came time to vote on the bill, not enough committee members could be found for a quorum. Committee chairman Patrick O’Donnell, a Democrat, tried again “more than six hours later,” wrote GVWire, but he couldn’t get a motion to vote on the bill, at which point the bill was withdrawn.
It was the second victory for California homeschoolers Wednesday. Earlier, Democratic Assemblywoman Susan Eggman pulled from that day’s debate — but not permanently — her bill to create an “advisory committee” on homeschooling. That bill had previously contained language to mandate “home inspections, curriculum standards and certification for parent teachers,” penned GVWire.
Homeschoolers and their supporters were ecstatic over the defeat of Medina’s legislation. “It is dead! You did it! We did it!!!!!” exclaimed Stefanie Duncan Foster on the Parents United 4 Kids Facebook group.
Kiley tweeted that the bill’s demise was a “major victory for all the homeschool educators, parents, and students who came to the Capitol and made their voice heard.”
“This is a victory worth celebrating,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, a conservative legal-defense organization that opposed the bill. “All is not lost in California; when we stand together, we can still make a difference.”
Indeed, as homeschoolers are increasingly proving, they are a force with which to be reckoned.

"STAND FOR THE SECOND" STUDENT WALK OUT EXTENDS ACROSS THE LAND


Stand for the Second walkouts across the nation

Students in 40 states walked out of class today in support of the second amendment.
"STAND FOR THE SECOND" STUDENT WALK OUT EXTENDS ACROSS THE LAND 
BY BOB ADELMANN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Will Riley, a senior at the 1,600-student Carlsbad High School in Carlsbad, New Mexico, got upset when he saw the mainstream media fawning over the likes of David Hogg and his March for Our Lives rally. He decided to do something about it: “I’m watching the news and I see they’re saying, ‘Well, we have to do something about [school shootings]. We have to enact some sort of gun control legislation because this is what the kids are asking for.’ And I’m thinking, ‘I’m not asking for that. I look at my friends and I think, ‘They’re not asking for that.’”
So, on his own, he started “Stand for the Second” — a 16-minute walkout by students at Carlsbad to support the Second Amendment. The walkout took place today at 10 a.m. Said Riley, “I wanted to give a voice to all of the people who feel that they’re being misrepresented by the media.”
Riley was invited to express his views by the Washington Examiner, and he unloaded on the mainstream media’s attempt to apply the views of David Hogg to every student in the country. He wrote in April:
For the past month, Americans have been subjected to wall-to-wall cable news coverage of a well-orchestrated campaign to dismantle the Second Amendment. This campaign, organized and funded by national gun control groups, has exploited a handful of grieving teens from the Parkland, Fla., high school shooting tragedy.
As a high school senior in Carlsbad, N.M., who supports gun rights, I am disgusted by how these students and their adult handlers are trying to define my generation. My generation is not anti-Second Amendment. My generation does not agree with retired Justice John Paul Stevens that the Second Amendment should be repealed.
Riley claimed that his generation — the iGeneration (aka Post-Millennials) — are more pro-Second Amendment than their parents:
A recent Gallup poll found that 66 percent of 18-to-29-year-olds said they think that concealed carry guns would make the U.S. safer, 10 percentage points higher than the national average of 56 percent….
These Parkland high school students do not speak for my generation….
Currently [April 12], my Stand for the Second walkout is expected to draw about a thousand students at Carlsbad High School, with a small residual effect causing similar walkouts in Artesia, Hobbs, and possibly Roswell [New Mexico]….
My generation has an obligation to define itself and not let ourselves be defined by national gun control groups. This is our opportunity to stand up for the Second Amendment and have our voices heard in this critical national debate.
Enter Mary Beth Martin of Tea Party Patriots. Learning of Riley’s idea she offered her group’s resources — financial and experiential — to Riley. A website was set up and social media did the rest. Today, Wednesday, May 2, 2018, students in more than 300 schools in 40 states — from Bonita Vista High School in Chula Vista, California, to Oxbow High School in Bradford, Vermont; from Port Angeles High School in Port Angeles, Washington, to Cypress Bay High School in Weston, Florida — are staging a 16-minute “Stand for the Second” walkout.
Singlehandedly, Will Riley’s “Stand for the Second” is strengthening Americans’ belief in the younger generation and reminding the mainstream media that they do not speak for the “iGeneration” when it comes to infringing on the Second Amendment.  

LESS MASCULINE "BOY" SCOUTS BECOMES "SCOUTS USA" TO SHOW INCLUSIVITY WITH GIRLS & LGBT KIDS~SURRENDERS TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IN LIEU OF MORALITY, "DUTY TO GOD"

BOYS SACRIFICED ON ALTAR OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS REQUIRES 
A LESS "SEXIST" APPROACH 
Boy Scouts to Remove Word 'Boy' from Name

It’s NOT OK To Be Boys: Scouts BSA 

(BullS**tting America)

Lionel joins David Knight to ask why they talk about “toxic masculinity” but not “toxic feminity”. It’s OK to continue to have Girl Scouts open to only girls, but the Boy Scouts cannot continue and will now be called “Scouts BSA” and open to both boys and girls.
"BOY" SCOUTS BECOMES "SCOUTS USA" TO SHOW INCLUSIVITY WITH GIRLS & LGBT KIDS
BY ASSOCIATED PRESS
SEE: https://nypost.com/2018/05/02/boy-scouts-to-get-new-name-after-108-years-as-girls-join-group/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Boy Scouts to get new name after 108 years as girls join group

TEXAS, SIX OTHER STATES SUE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OVER FAILURE TO END DACA

TEXAS SUES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION 
TO STOP "DACA" 
DACA is not a law, not an executive order. FORMER DHS Secretary Napolitano merely wrote a memo but activist federal judges pretend neither President Trump nor the current DHS Sec can change it and enforce the law. And, Ted Cruz’s Democrat opponent wants to have debates in Spanish, not English.
TEXAS, SIX OTHER STATES SUE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OVER FAILURE TO END DACA

Texas attorney general blames activist judges for blocking Trump from ending program

BY ADAN SALAZAR
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/texas-six-other-states-sue-trump-administration-over-failure-to-end-daca/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is leading a multi-state lawsuit against the Trump administration over its continuation of the Obama-era DACA program.
Paxton filed the lawsuit in federal court Tuesday, seeking an end to the “unconstitutional” immigration program protecting many illegals from deportation.
“The multi-state coalition lawsuit we filed today is about the rule of law, not the wisdom of any particular immigration policy,” Paxton said at a press conference.
According to Paxton, the suit faults activist judges for preventing the Trump administration from phasing out DACA as promised.
“That means that unelected federal judges are forcing the Trump administration to leave an unlawful program in place indefinitely as legal challenges drag on,” Paxton said.
“President Trump has a duty under the Constitution to take care that the law be faithfully executed.”
Other states joining the lawsuit include Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina and West Virginia.
Check out the lawsuit below:


HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA 
BY A.F. BRANCO
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/05/destroy-america/#axzz5EShJ0z5c; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Democrats Destroy America
How to Destroy America
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News
USA –-(Ammoland.com)- How to Destroy America.
How do you negotiate with people who want to enact policies that will literally destroy America? You don’t.
Did you enjoy this cartoon?

You call yourself pro-gun? Prove it by joining anyone or all of these fine civil rights organizations:

Comically Incorrect
Comically Incorrect
And, please consider support for the Second Front in Defense of the Second Amendment:
About A.F. Branco
A.F. Branco is a GrassRoots Conservative Political Cartoonist for Conservative Daily News, Net Right Daily, Legal Insurrection, and now Ammoland Shooting Sports News.
A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and manifested them into the cartoons that have been seen all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News” and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, and even the great El Rushbo.
Share this page and help spread our pro gun, conservative message with humor.

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

ANNI CYRUS, IRANIAN SHARIA SURVIVOR, SCHOOLS ANTIFA "FEMINIST"

ANNI CYRUS, IRANIAN SHARIA SURVIVOR, SCHOOLS ANTIFA "FEMINIST" 
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/anni-cyrus-sharia-survivor-schools-antifa-feminist; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
On this new special edition of The Glazov Gang, we are running a stirring speech that our very own Anni Cyrus recently delivered to the Unite America First Gathering for Justice in Dearborn, Michigan on April 21, 2018.
During the speech, Antifa protestors tried to shout Anni down, but Anni prevailed in telling the truth about Islamic Law — and in also schooling an Antifa “feminist”.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!

BBC HITS TRUMP FOR "DANGEROUS RHETORIC" FOR POINTING OUT THAT "CHRISTIANS ARE BEING MURDERED IN NIGERIA"

BBC HITS TRUMP FOR "DANGEROUS RHETORIC" FOR POINTING OUT THAT "CHRISTIANS ARE BEING MURDERED IN NIGERIA" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/bbc-hits-trump-for-dangerous-rhetoric-for-pointing-out-that-christians-are-being-murdered-in-nigeria; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Christians are being murdered in Nigeria, but for the BBC, President Trump was wrong to point that out: “The US president showed little understanding of a very complicated and intensely politicised crisis.” It seems that President Trump has a bad habit of defending Christians: “Mr Trump has always been quick to jump to the defense of Christians in conflicts such as Syria and Iraq and comments like this play well to his base among Evangelical Christians in the US.”
What is so complicated about the conflict in Nigeria? “It is a widely touted refrain that the conflict between farmers and herdsmen constitutes a ‘genocide against Christians’. It is hard to support this claim with any fact: there have been many killings on both sides in this conflict.”
This is wildly misleading. Christians have been massacred frequently in Nigeria, as you can see here. On a small number of occasions, Christians have fought back. But the BBC’s contention that this is a conflict in which both sides share equal responsibility is flatly false.
Note also that in the video above, Buhari thanks Trump for decimating ISIS, with which Boko Haram was affiliated. That doesn’t make the BBC report, which does its best to make Trump sound moronic. Actually, Trump’s question to Buhari was about the girls that Boko Haram kidnapped, and Buhari answered it as the serious question it was.
“How Trump stirred controversy in Nigeria,” BBC, May 1, 2018 (thanks to Damian):
Nigeria’s Muhammadu Buhari became the first president from sub-Saharan Africa to visit Donald Trump’s White House on Monday. But even after they neatly avoided Mr Trump’s alleged comments about “shithole” African countries, the US president managed to stir controversy in Nigeria, writes the BBC’s Stephanie Hegarty from Lagos.
Perhaps warning bells rang when Mr Trump started off asking Mr Buhari how he was getting on with “that Boca Haram”, a reference to militant Islamist group Boko Haram.
But then again, maybe that slip of the tongue was predictable.
Less so was what he said next, as the former reality television star weighed in on the conflict between herdsmen and farmers in Nigeria’s Middle Belt – or the way in which he would frame it.
“We have had very serious problems with Christians who are being murdered in Nigeria,” Mr Trump said. “We are going to be working on that problem very, very hard because we cannot allow that to happen.”
‘Genocide’?
The US president showed little understanding of a very complicated and intensely politicised crisis – one which has a battle between nomadic cattle herders and settled farmer over access to land and grazing rights at its centre.
But perhaps it should not come as any surprise. Mr Trump has always been quick to jump to the defence of Christians in conflicts such as Syria and Iraq and comments like this play well to his base among Evangelical Christians in the US.
But his point of view also plays into popular feeling among some Nigerian Christian groups.
It is a widely touted refrain that the conflict between farmers and herdsmen constitutes a “genocide against Christians”.
It is hard to support this claim with any fact: there have been many killings on both sides in this conflict.
But the recent attack on a Catholic church by suspected Fulani herdsmen and the murder of 17 people, including two priests, have added fuel to the flames of those who want to frame the conflict in this way.
After that attack a priest in the area told the BBC he was doing what he could do prevent young Christian men from his parish launching random reprisal attacks on Muslims. Clearly then, Mr Trump’s words then make for dangerous rhetoric….

SECRETARY OF STATE MIKE POMPEO GIVES STRONG ADDRESS TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT~TRUMP AT SWEARING IN OF POMPEO

SECRETARY OF STATE MIKE POMPEO GIVES STRONG ADDRESS TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT 

President Trump Participates in the Swearing In Ceremony of the Secretary of State Pompeo May 2 2018


President Donald Trump Gives VITAL Speech at the State Department with Mike Pompeo


Pompeo: We Will Soon Move Our Embassy to Jerusalem 'Years Ahead of Schedule'


TURKEY CALLS FOR CRIMINALIZING "ISLAMOPHOBIA"~GLOBALISTS' MIGRANT PLAN COLLAPSES THE WEST

TURKEY CALLS FOR CRIMINALIZING "ISLAMOPHOBIA"~GLOBALISTS' MIGRANT PLAN COLLAPSES THE WEST 
Alex Jones breaks down how Turkish officials are calling to criminalize "Islamophobia" while the Globalists' migrant invasion plan continues to collapse the West by destabilizing surrounding regions.