Translate

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

IVANKA TRUMP ON THE VICIOUSNESS OF WASHINGTON D.C. SWAMP~BUT STILL ASSOCIATES WITH LIBERAL GLOBALIST SOCIALIST WOMEN

IVANKA TRUMP ON THE VICIOUSNESS OF WASHINGTON D.C. SWAMP~BUT STILL ASSOCIATES WITH LIBERAL GLOBALIST SOCIALIST WOMEN 
 Published on Jun 13, 2017
Rob Dew & Owen Shroyer play a clip from Fox News of the
president's daughter, Ivanka telling Fox & Friends how she was
shocked by how vicious D.C. has been to their whole family.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/...
 

OVER 65,000 BRITS RALLY WITH TOMMY ROBINSON IN MANCHESTER STREETS AGAINST MUSLIM TAKEOVER

OVER 65,000 BRITS RALLY WITH TOMMY ROBINSON IN MANCHESTER STREETS AGAINST MUSLIM TAKEOVER
 Published on Jun 11, 2017
Tommy Robinson held a rally today (6/11/2017) in Manchester, the town in which a Muslim jihadist suicide bomber killed 22 people at an Arianna Grande concert.
 

Sunday, June 11, 2017

TWO "TRANNY" STORIES: PARENTS TRAIN THEIR KIDS TO BE TRANNIES~UNITED METHODISTS ORDAIN A "TRANNY"

PARENTS TRAIN THEIR KIDS TO BE TRANNIES
 Published on Jun 10, 2017
In a story that should send CPS into action (not likely), a parent is forcing her kid into the limelight by turning him into a drag queen star.
 UMCC Methodist Apostate church Ordains Tranny

ISLAMIC STATE APPLAUDS MURDER OF "BELLIGERENT CHRISTIANS" IN PHILIPPINES

 
ISLAMIC STATE APPLAUDS MURDER OF 
"BELLIGERENT CHRISTIANS" IN PHILIPPINES 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 “Belligerent” because they are opposing the hegemony of Sharia, and hence 
are kuffar harbi, infidels at war with Islam.
 
“Islamic State Magazine Applauds Mass Executions of ‘Belligerent Christians’ in Philippines,” by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, June 9, 2017:
Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) jihadists, in the most recent edition of their propaganda magazine Rumiyah, have reportedly released “unseen” pictures of “belligerent Christians” executed by the jihadist group in the Philippines.
“The soldiers of the Khilafah in East Asia stormed the city of Marawi in the southern Philippines on the island of Mindanao, chased out the local police and the military, and raised the banner of the Islamic State,” the jihadists wrote in the latest issue of Rumiyah,  titled “The Jihad in East Asia.”
The new issue focuses on ISIS’s ongoing operations in the Christian-majority nation of the Philippines, where the terrorist group has been clashing with government forces, particularly in the country’s only “Islamic city” of Marawi.
In late May, Filipino jihadist groups loyal to ISIS, Abu Sayyaf and the Maute fighters, captured the city, and the government forces have been trying to liberate the Marawi since.
ISIS is trying to establish a caliphate in the city, burning cathedrals, taking Christian hostages, and killing civilians who were unable to quote scripture from the Quran.
In Rumiyah, the leader of ISIS’s East Asia branch incites Muslims to “teach the Crusaders that zero hour has arrived.”
“Our meeting will be at Washington and Moscow,” writes Rita Katz, the director of the SITE Intelligence Group that tracks jihadi groups online via Twitter:
ISIS “shows unseen picture of executions of ‘belligerent Christians’ by pointblank gunshot after sieging #Marawi,”…
ISIS released its latest issue of Rumiyah during Ramadan, considered the holiest month for Muslims and a time when Islamic extremists encourage martyrdom and jihad….
 

JAMES COMEY, FORMER FBI DIRECTOR: LORETTA LYNCH ORDERED COVER UP OF HILLARY CLINTON CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION~FULL REVIEW BY MICHAEL SAVAGE

JAMES COMEY, FORMER FBI DIRECTOR: 
LORETTA LYNCH ORDERED COVER UP OF 
HILLARY CLINTON CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
 Published on Jun 9, 2017
One of the biggest revelations from the Comey Hearing was that he admitted former Attorney General Loretta Lynch ordered him not to call the investigation into Hillary Clinton and "investigation" but instead to just call it a "matter." Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Michael Savage responds to Comey hearings
 

U.S. TAXPAYERS FUND TAKEOVER OF COLOMBIA BY MARXIST TERRORISTS

U.S. TAXPAYERS FUND TAKEOVER OF COLOMBIA 
BY MARXIST TERRORISTS
BY ALEX NEWMAN
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Thanks to Congress and the Obama administration, American taxpayers are expected to pour millions of dollars into a ruthless Marxist terrorist group known as the FARC (shown), the Spanish acronym for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Among other crimes, the Castro-backed terror group has slaughtered and tortured hundreds of thousands of civilians, pumped unfathomable amounts of cocaine into the United States, kidnapped and raped children, and much more. If establishment forces in Washington, D.C., and Bogota get their way, however, U.S. taxpayers will help finance not only the FARC itself, but the communist takeover of Colombia as well.
Under Obama, whose political career literally began in the home of a Castro-backed terrorist, U.S. taxpayers were put on the hook for almost half of a billion dollars to Colombia last year. Much of that money was supposed to be used to pursue the fraudulent “peace” deal that will literally put mass-murdering FARC terrorists in Congress — without serving a single day in jail for their 50 years of mass murder and war crimes. Obama promised even more cash, and the GOP Congress approved it. However, the establishment-backed “peace” deal was so outrageous that, even after 50 years of facing FARC terror and barbarism, and despite massive amounts of tax-funded propaganda supporting the dangerous scheme, Colombians went to the polls and rejected it.
Stung by the loss, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, who brokered the “deal” with help from the mass-murdering communist dictatorship in Cuba, decided to force it on Colombians against their will anyway. Less than 20 percent of Colombians approve of Santos, who lied to get into power and whose campaign was funded by a corrupt communist network currently facing serious pressure across Latin America. To push his scheme even after the people voted no, Santos made a few minor changes and rammed it through Congress instead, claiming the only way to have peace was to give the terrorists everything they demanded. 
Popular former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, on the other hand, who had practically crushed the terrorists, has warned that the Castro-Santos-Obama-FARC “peace” deal is really a plot to turn his nation into another totalitarian state along the lines of Venezuela. “The FARC have achieved with Santos that which they did not obtain in 50 years of violence,” Uribe declared last year, with his coalition saying that Santos had “ceded everything” to the terrorists. Virtually the exact same “peace” process played out in El Salvador, resulting in mass-murdering communist terrorists taking over — again with blatant help and funding from Obama and the establishment.
As The New American and numerous other sources documented, the Obama administration was a key supporter of the Colombia deal. Essentially, unless something is done to stop it, the “peace” plan will grant amnesty, huge amounts of money, its own paramilitary force funded by taxpayers, kangaroo courts to terrorize the military and police, and lots of political power for the mass-murdering group of terrorists and war criminals known as the FARC. Basically everything the FARC wanted, and could never obtain through votes or through terror and mass murder, is being handed to it on a silver platter by Santos and his allies in brokering the deal, critics have noted. And now, globalists and communists in Washington, D.C., and across Latin America are hoping to subsidize that process with billions of U.S. dollars extracted from taxpayers. 
The Trump administration proposed a slight cutback to the U.S. taxpayer funding for Bogota and the pseudo-“peace” plan, down less than a third from the nearly half a billion that Obama pledged for 2017. Yet even those tiny cuts getting back to 2015 funding levels are in jeopardy. Instead, establishment-minded members of Congress and George Soros lobbyists posing as "activists" are working to salvage the U.S. aid for the communist terrorists and their fraudulent, unpopular “peace deal” practically handing Colombia over to savage mass murderers. But as the truth comes out about Colombian President Santos and his links to Latin American communist forces, not to mention the atrocious “peace” deal, U.S. lawmakers will be hard-pressed to explain the aid.    
Crucial to understanding the developments in Colombia is an understanding of the Foro de Sao Paulo (FSP), or the Sao Paulo Forum in English. The network was founded by murderous dictator Fidel Castro, Marxist-Leninist former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio “Lula” da Silva, the mass-murdering Sandanistas in Nicaragua, and Marxist terror groups very much including the FARC. Their plan, as official documents from the outfit have revealed, is to rebuild in Latin America what was “lost” in Eastern Europe — namely, communist totalitarianism. Despite the silence and the subsidies, the U.S. government knows all about it, and it has full support from operatives in establishment institutions such as the Council on Foreign Relations. 
The FSP network already controls most Latin American governments through its member parties. Some of its minions are even running United Nations agencies. And yet, many of the network's key operatives are currently being prosecuted, including FSP co-founder “Lula” from Brazil, for some of the brazen criminal activity they used to seize control of those governments in the first place. Oil money from Venezuela has helped fund the takeover. So has drug money from the FARC in Colombia. But now, in Brazil, which top experts have pointed to as a central player in the FSP takeover, the Operation Car Wash corruption (Lava Jato) has resulted in some of the mechanisms used to steal public money to finance their allies being exposed.
A “construction” company known as Odebrecht was one important tool used to funnel stolen public money to FSP operatives — including Lula, former President Ollanta Humala in Peru, Santos, and countless others, according to investigators and prosecutors. Santos has admitted his campaign received Odebrecht funds, though he tried to act like he knew nothing about it, implausible to put it mildly.
While much of the establishment press has treated the Odebrecht scandal as one of “corruption,” it is infinitely more significant than the mere stealing of public money. Indeed, the far more important story is that the corrupt company was involved in financing numerous FSP-backed political campaigns in countries including Brazil, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Panama, Argentina, Colombia, and more. It is all part of a deadly scheme mischaracterized as the "Pink Tide" by establishment analysts, that would more properly be termed a Red Tsunami. Communist China and the Kremlin are also onboard. 
Billionaire globalist Soros has his fingerprints all over the Latin American communist network, anti-communist forces have explained. He has even supported FSP politicians for office, and Soros minions such as Arminio Fraga were among Odebrecht's major investors. In fact, before his ally Obama — who has also showered money on FSP operatives — poured U.S. tax money into Brazil's state-run oil giant Petrobras, Soros had also invested in the behemoth. Investigators later revealed that Petrobras was being used as a cash cow to help finance the FSP takeover with money stolen from taxpayers. So it is no surprise that Soros front groups are running damage control trying to push the “corruption” narrative surrounding Odebrecht.
His propaganda organs and “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) are hard at work deflecting attention from the real scandal. “Despite their different political affiliations and ideologies, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, former Brazilian President Lula da Silva, and former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo have one rather damning connection: their futures are tied to the construction company responsible for the biggest corruption scandal in history,” writes the far-left Open Democracy, a Soros-funded operation named after Soros' “Open Society” foundations.
In reality, though, the “ideologies” of all three of the alleged criminals — if communism can be said to be an “ideology,” as opposed to a criminal conspiracy of murderous savages — appear to be the same, except on paper perhaps. Despite deceiving the people of Colombia with lies on the campaign trail, where Santos vowed to continue the successful anti-FARC policies of his anti-communist predecessor, actions speak louder than words. And Santos' plot to illegally hand the nation over to Marxist narco-terrorists in defiance of the people does not just speak louder, it screams out for attention and justice.   
It is also no surprise that other Soros-funded “advocacy” groups, under the phony guise of promoting “human rights,” are demanding that U.S. taxpayers continue showering money on the Santos regime and its partners in crime at the FARC. The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), for example, which is funded by Soros and has Soros “Open Society” minions on its board, called on U.S. lawmakers to reject Trump's measly cuts and keep handing over American tax money to the scheme.
“It’ll be up to Congress to save Peace Colombia,” said Adam Isacson, who runs the “Defense Oversight Program” at WOLA, with “Peace Colombia” referring to U.S. subsidies for the fraudulent “peace” plan giving the FARC everything it wants. Isacson has been trotted out all across the establishment media to support forcing American taxpayers to pay for the communist bonanza. Yet none of the press ever points out that his “non-profit” group is funded by Soros, a Rothschild protege, who has been repeatedly linked to the ongoing attempt by communist forces to take over Latin America.
Prominent voices in the United States, though, have highlighted some of the dangers and the absurdity of showering U.S. tax money on the communist takeover of Colombia. “In fact, it’s less a peace agreement than a pathway to dictatorship for a key U.S. ally and to an expansion of drug trafficking here,” wrote Monica Crowley, a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, adding that Trump and Congress should absolutely reject U.S. funding for the disaster. That would have the added benefit of helping Trump make good on two campaign promises, she said: protecting U.S. taxpayers and stemming the flow of drugs into America.
“Santos desperately wants Obama’s promised $450 million annually to implement the deal — which will include direct distributions to FARC members and government grants of millions of acres of prime agricultural land while providing no compensation to the victims of FARC crimes,” Crowley explained in the New York Post, adding that the scheming might even force the Colombian military to intervene to prevent the nation being handed to ruthless communist terrorists. “Such a gift, whether whole or in part, would be interpreted as U.S. support for the agreement.... The Colombian people desire peace, but its price should not be the handover of the government to the narco-terrorists or military — with a substantial assist in blood money from U.S. taxpayers.”
Beyond the absurdity of subsidizing communist terrorists and their takeover of a nation with U.S. tax money is the fact that nowhere does the U.S. Constitution authorize foreign aid — period. Indeed, U.S. foreign aid has proven to be disastrous, from bringing mass-murdering gangsters such as Castro to power, to spawning Islamic terrorist groups. Instead of bankrolling Marxist terrorists in Latin America and helping enslave Colombia, Congress should immediately quit borrowing money to shower it on foreign governments and terror groups all over the world. That way, Colombians can decide their future for themselves, and Americans can quit being saddled with impossible-to-pay debts and absurdly high taxes. Communists have murdered a hundred million people in the last century. Republicans in Congress should know better than to help them enslave yet another country. 

Related articles:
Obama-backed FARC Deal a Bonanza for Marxist Terrorists
Resurgent Communism in Latin America
Obama’s Political Career Began With Castro-backed Terrorist
Obama Pushes Amnesty for Marxist Narco-Terrorists in Colombia
With Obama Support, Santos Gives Colombia to Marxist Terrorists
Communist Mass-murderer Wins Suspicious El Salvador Election
Globalists and Gangs Back Marxist Mass-murderer in El Salvador
Exposure of Radical CFR Latin America Boss Offers Broad Insight
Brazil’s Former President Lula to Stand Trial in Third Corruption Case
U.S. Ambassador Outs Powerful Totalitarian Cabal in Latin America
UN Seeks Criminal Charges Against Editor for His Reporting
In Latin America, Russia and China Push New World Order
Uprising Against Autocrats Sweeps Latin America
Obama Pushes Communist Vision of “Rights” on Cuba Trip
South American Union Selects Socialist Leaders

PRESIDENT TRUMP WEEKLY ADDRESS

PRESIDENT TRUMP WEEKLY ADDRESS 
 President Donald Trump Weekly Address On His Plan 
to Rebuild American Infrastructure
White House
June 9, 2017
 

TRUMP'S FULL PRESS CONFERENCE WITH ROMANIAN PRESIDENT~GEORGE SOROS PLOTS TO DESTROY ROMANIA

TRUMP'S FULL PRESS CONFERENCE 
WITH ROMANIAN PRESIDENT
 Published on Jun 9, 2017
President Trump holds a press conference with the President of Romania Klaus Iohannis and fires back at James Comey, calling him a leaker and claiming he lied under oath 🇺🇸

President Donald Trump Full Press Conference with President of Romania Klaus Iohannis
White House Rose Garden
June 9, 2017
 George Soros’ Plot to Destroy Romania
 

Friday, June 9, 2017

BERNIE SANDERS DISPLAYS VISIBLE FURY AT CHRISTIAN NOMINEE WHO BELIEVES JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD

 BERNIE'S RELIGIOUS "LITMUS TEST" DISQUALIFIES CHRISTIANS
 http://apologiaradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/bernie-sanders-russell-vought.jpg
 http://gongs.gongsters.com/d231e4b9ace63f20a7889c8028a34723.jpg
BERNIE SANDERS BLOOD PRESSURE ROSE & FACE TURNED RED IN FURY
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — Former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders became 
agitated and hostile on Wednesday during the questioning of Deputy Budget 
Director nominee Russell Vought, as he noted a social media post written by 
Vought that remarked that Muslims “do not know God because they have 
rejected Jesus Christ his Son, and they stand condemned.”
Sanders began by reading a joint letter from the Arab American Institute, Bend the Arc Jewish Action, and Muslim Advocates, which expressed objection to Vought’s nomination because he had “denigrated Muslims” and therefore has shown “hostility to religious pluralism.”
He then pointed to a portion of an article written by Vought last January in response to the Wheaton College controversy surrounding then-professor Larycia Hawkins’ assertion that Christians and Muslims “worship the same God.” Hawkins’ remarks had resulted in an investigation by the college and generated much discussion nationwide as to whether or not the Christian school was right to take action when such messages are put forth by its staff.
“Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ, His Son, and they stand condemned,” Vought, an alumni of Wheaton and a Christian, wrote in part in commenting on the controversy.

“Do you believe that that statement is Islamophobic?” Sanders asked during questioning on Wednesday.
“Absolutely not, Senator. I’m a Christian, and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith,” Vought replied. “That post, as I stated in the questionnaire to this committee, was to defend my alma mater, Wheaton College, a Christian school that has a statement of faith that includes the centrality of Jesus Christ for salvation.”
Sanders then asked Vought if he believes Muslims are condemned by God for rejecting His Son.

“Do you believe people in the Muslim religion stand condemned? Is that your view?” he inquired.
“Again, Senator, I’m a Christian, and I wrote that piece in accordance with the statement of faith at Wheaton College,” Vought responded.
“I understand that. I don’t know how many Muslims there are in America—maybe a couple million. Are you suggesting that all those people stand condemned? What about Jews? Do they stand condemned, too?” Sanders questioned.
Vought again sought to emphasize that he is a Christian, and Christians believe that Christ is the only way to God.
“I understand you are a Christian!” Sanders erupted angrily. “But this country is made of people who are not just—I understand that Christianity is the majority religion, but there are other people of different religions in this country and around the world.”
He repeated, “In your judgment, do you think that people who are not Christians are going to be condemned?”
“As a Christian, I believe that all individuals are made in the image of God and are worthy of dignity and respect regardless of their religious beliefs. I believe that as a Christian that’s how I should treat all individuals,” Vought replied.
Sanders, finding it disrespectful to state that those who reject Jesus stand in danger of God’s judgment, again pressed Vought.
“You think your statement that you put into that publication, ‘They do not know God because they rejected Jesus Christ, His Son, and they stand condemned,’ do you think that’s respectful of other religions?” he asked.
“Senator, I wrote a post based on being a Christian and attending a Christian school that has a statement of faith that speaks clearly in regard to the centrality of Jesus Christ in salvation,” Vought repeated.
Sanders then remarked that Vought is unAmerican and therefore should not be confirmed.
“I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who this country is supposed to be about,” he said.
He also released a statement about Vought later in the day, remarking that “condemning an entire group of people because of their faith cannot be part of any public policy.”
Jesus said in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
He also declared in John 3:18, “He that believeth on Him (the Son of God) is not condemned, but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”
 
Does Bernie Sanders Hate Christian America?
 Published on Jun 9, 2017
David Knight and Owen Shroyer break down a video of Bernie Sanders berating a government servant for holding personal, religious beliefs that happen to be of the Christian faith.
 
Bernie Sanders: Trojan Horse For Radical Islam 
 Published on Jun 9, 2017
Owen Shroyer and David Knight interview Matt Dubiel about an upcoming pro-Muslim event in Chicago in which Bernie Sanders will be speaking.
 
Nice guy Bernie Sanders blows his stack on a Christian who believes Jesus is the only way. 
POSTMODERNISM ON DISPLAY;
SHUTTING DOWN FREE SPEECH 

CONFIRMED: COMEY COMMITTED PERJURY TO CONGRESS; MAKES STARTLING ADMISSIONS~ADMITS LORETTA LYNCH ORDERED HIM TO COVER UP CLINTON CRIMES

THE SWAMP EXPOSED
COMEY'S "FEELINGS BASED" TESTIMONY SHOWS HIM TO BE A COWARD & TRAITOR
 Confirmed: Comey Committed Perjury to Congress
CONFIRMED: COMEY COMMITTED PERJURY TO CONGRESS
 NYT debunked: Trump didn't directly order end of Flynn investigation
BY KIT DANIELS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Despite admitting President Trump “simply hoped” the FBI would drop its probe into former national security advisor Michael Flynn, former FBI Director James Comey said he interpreted this as a direct order, which contradicts his sworn Senate testimony on May 3.
Comey now confirms Trump simply hoped the investigation into Flynn would end during their Feb. meeting in the White House, which Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) pointed out was a “wish” rather than an actual directive from the president:

But Comey claims he interpreted Trump’s wish as a direct order, which contradicts his sworn Senate testimony on May 3 in which he said from his experience, the Trump administration did not try to stop the investigation.
The former FBI director even told Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) it would “be a big deal to tell the FBI to stop doing something that – without an appropriate purpose.”
“But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal. It’s not happened in my experience,” he said.
Here’s that exchange from May 3:
Comey’s statement to Rubio also contradicts his February memo that the mainstream media claimed was a “smoking gun” against Trump, particularly the New York Times article from May 16 which sourced Comey’s memo to claim Trump asked him to shut down the probe.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealKitDaniels
Twitter: 
MORE Videos: Resistance News

 
________________________________________________________
 Bombshell: Comey Admits Leaking Memos to Press

Former FBI director admitted to giving memos to friend to leak to the press following President Trump's tweets

BY ADAN SALAZAR

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/bombshell-comey-admits-leaking-memos-to-press/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Former FBI Director James Comey admitted Thursday to orchestrating leaks to the press in hopes of prompting the appointment of a special prosecutor in the FBI’s Russia probe.
The fired FBI director had kept written memos of his meetings with President Trump.
In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey admitted to giving his memos to his Columbia law professor “good friend” Daniel C. Richman to leak to the press following Trump’s tweets insinuating he had recorded his conversations with Comey.

Under oath, Comey told Sen. Susan Collins:
“The president tweeted on Friday after I got fired that I better hope there’s not tapes.
I woke up in the middle of the night on Monday night cause it didn’t dawn on me originally that there might be corroboration for our conversation, and my judgement was I needed to get that out into the public square and so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter, didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.“
The Twitter-sphere immediately cried foul after the former FBI head admitted to leaking his own memos, with some wondering whether he’d committed a criminal offense and others speculating he could have also leaked confidential info.






The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., commented the FBI director was more than willing to leak damaging info against his father, but nothing that exonerates him, as also highlighted during the hearing by Sen. Marco Rubio.

In subsequent testimony to Sen. Roy Blunt, Comey claimed he believed it OK to have his memos leaked as they were his personal “recollections” as a “private citizen.”
Here’s a transcript of their exchange, via Politico:
BLUNT: You said something earlier and I don’t want to fail to follow up on, you said after dismissed, you gave information to a friend so that friend could get that information into the public media.
COMEY: Correct.
BLUNT: What kind of information was that? What kind of information did you give to a friend?
COMEY: That the — the Flynn conversation. The president had asked me to let the Flynn — forgetting my exact own words. But the conversation in the Oval Office.
BLUNT: So you didn’t consider your memo or your sense of that conversation to be a government document. You considered it to be, somehow, your own personal document that you could share to the media as you wanted through a friend?
COMEY: Correct. I understood this to be my recollection recorded of my conversation with the president. As a private citizen, I thought it important to get it out.
BLUNT: Were all your memos that you recorded on classified or other memos that might be yours as a private citizen?
COMEY: I’m not following the question.
BLUNT: You said you used classified —
COMEY: Not the classified documents. Unclassified. I don’t have any of them anymore. I gave them to the special counsel. My view was that the content of those unclassified, memorialization of those conversations was my recollection recorded.
BLUNT: So why didn’t you give those to somebody yourself rather than give them through a third party?
COMEY: Because I was weary the media was camping at the end of my driveway at that point. I was actually going out of town with my wife to hide. I worried it would be feeding seagulls at the beach. If it was I who gave it to the media. I asked my friend, make sure this gets out.
BLUNT: It does seem to me what you do there is create a source close to the former director of the FBI as opposed to taking responsibility yourself for saying, here are the records. Like everybody else, I have other things I’d like to get into but I’m out of time.
The Trump administration has made it known it would aggressively pursue “criminal leaks.”

“The FBI is totally unable to stop the national security ‘leakers’ that have permeated our government for a long time,” the president noted on social media in February, at the time unaware the FBI director was leaking to the press.

Last month, the president tweeted he had specifically asked FBI director Comey to help find leakers.

Update: President Trump’s lawyer Marc Kasowitz issued a response to Comey’s testimony saying the former FBI director shared “unauthorized disclosures” with the press a day BEFORE Trump’s tweet, directly contradicting Comey’s remarks Thursday in which he stated he leaked the memos after the president’s tweet.
From Kasowitz’s statement, via the Los Angeles Times:
The President also never told Mr. Comey, “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty” in form or substance. Of course, the Office of the President is entitled to expect loyalty from those who are serving in an administration, and, from before this President took office to this day, it is overwhelmingly clear that there have been and continue to be those in government who are actively attempting to undermine this administration with selective and illegal leaks of classified information and privileged communications. Mr. Comey has now admitted that he is one of these leakers.
Today, Mr. Comey admitted that he unilaterally and surreptitiously made unauthorized disclosures to the press of privileged communications with the President. The leaks of this privileged information began no later than March 2017 when friends of Mr. Comey have stated he disclosed to them the conversations he had with the President during their January 27, 2017 dinner and February 14, 2017 White House meeting. Today, Mr. Comey admitted that he leaked to friends his purported memos of these privileged conversations, one of which he testified was classified. He also testified that immediately after he was terminated he authorized his friends to leak the contents of these memos to the press in order to “prompt the appointment of a special counsel.” Although Mr. Comey testified he only leaked the memos in response to a tweet, the public record reveals that the New York Times was quoting from these memos the day before the referenced tweet, which belies Mr. Comey’s excuse for this unauthorized disclosure of privileged information and appears to entirely retaliatory. We will leave it the appropriate authorities to determine whether this leaks should be investigated along with all those others being investigated.
​In sum, it is now established that the President was not being investigated for colluding with the Russians or attempting to obstruct that investigation. As the Committee pointed out today, these important facts for the country to know are virtually the only facts that have not leaked during the long course of these events.
_______________________________________________________
 James Comey: The Wannabe J. Edgar Hoover 
JEROME CORSI & DAVID KNIGHT OF INFOWARS DISCUSS COMEY'S TREASON, PERJURY, AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 
 Top Ten Facts From Comey's Testimony
  Comey Calls Himself A Coward To Make Trump 
Look Like A Bully
 Comey Admits He Leaked Info Against Trump
 Unbelievable! Comey Admits Lynch Ordered Him To Cover Up Clinton Crimes
  Comey Rationalizes Why He Refused To Inform Public Trump Was Not Under Investigation
 James Comey Details How He Leaked To The NY Times
 James Comey Admits New York Times is Fake News! 
 Published on Jun 8, 2017
At the Comey Hearing, former FBI director admitted that a New York Times story based on an anonymous source was fake news when asked. He was under oath, and if he didn’t answer honestly, he would have risked being charged with perjury. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 President Trump's Lawyer Responds to 
James Comey Testimony
  Video: Comey Self Destructs In Front Of The World
 James Comey Senate Hearing (6.08.17) 
Recap And Reaction 
 Published on Jun 8, 2017
James Comey voluntarily attended a Senate Hearing to discuss his dismissal from Donald Trump’s administration which centers around his ability or lack thereof to properly handle the Russian hacking and election interference investigation. This has been widely anticipated by individuals on both sides of the political aisle and even some political agnostics, whether they be government employees or civilians. During the campaign, many on the left were calling for James Comey to be fired due to the letter he wrote in reference to Hillary Clinton’s corruption 11 days before the election.
A common theme during this Senate hearing was the constant talk about “feelings” and interpretation of things said rather than actual tangible facts. At the start of the hearing, Comey basically says he is confused as to the reason why he got fired. He says Trump told him that he was doing a good job and that everything was going well at the FBI. A lot of positive reaffirmation. Then one day he wakes up and his job is gone and Trump speaks to the media about Comey’s performance in a different way that does not add up. He also said that Trump lied about the FBI’s performance and morale and also his performance as FBI director.
Not a lot was learned during the Senate hearings that people who are plugged into politics did not already know. A few things were confirmed, however. First, Donald Trump was not under investigation by the FBI. The campaign was, and some surrogates may have been, but not Trump himself. Second, the reason why the letter about Hillary came out 11 days before the election is because of Bill Clinton ambushing Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Phoenix Arizona to have a 30 minute closed-door meeting while Hillary was being investigated by both the DOJ and the FBI. Third, Comey says that he kept a written record of all meetings he had with Trump because he didn’t quite feel comfortable around him alone and also with a large number of meetings. Comey revealed that he leaked information about those written records - not necessarily the written records themselves - to the FBI.
A lot was said during the public hearing but much more was probably said afterwards in the closed-door meeting where no media is allowed. As for what is known publicly, this whole ordeal was essentially a nothing burger with a few confirmations that help the right and not the left.
 Comey Serves Senate Intelligence Committee 
Big, Fat Treason Burger