ROBERT SPENCER ON HOW IRAN IS PURSUING ITS WAR AGAINST THE U.S.

ROBERT SPENCER ON HOW IRAN 

IS PURSUING ITS WAR AGAINST THE U.S. 

U.N. PREPARES TO TAKE CONTROL OF INTERNET

Internet Censorship Intensifies As UN Prepares To Take Control

Published on Aug 29, 2016

The globalists are doubling down in their efforts to suppress the truth as they move closer toward their goal of complete control of the internet.

Inquisition 2.0: The Internet Has Been 

Taken Hostage By The NWO

Published on Aug 30, 2016

Just So the oncoming Economic Nuclear Winter comes as no surprise. Let’s go over the mounting evidence that The Internet as we know it will be commandeered by globalist censors beginning midnight October 1st, when an entirely new era of the Internet will begin. Originally, President Obama promised that the Fed's handover of the antitrust protected Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers or ICANN would not involve the United Nations. Was this, yet again, a naive move by an incompetent President of the United States? Or has this been the plan all along?

Time and time again Congress has failed to pass draconian laws to control the internet. The Communications Decency Act of 1996, The Intellectual Property Enforcement Act of 2007, The Cybersecurity Act, The Protect IP Act of 2011, and SOPA to name a few all failed miserably against the ironclad integrity of the First Amendment.The globalists scurrying to their den of iniquity at Bilderberg would hear none of it. The internet must be controlled. Their very fortunes and lives depend on it. The public knows too much already. Control of the internet had to be torn from the protection of the U.S. Constitution.

OBAMA APPOINTEE MANAGES SOROS BACKED ELECTION FUND FOCUSING ON "COLOR" & "CHOICE"~FBI SAYS ELECTION HACK A "SERIOUS THREAT"

ABOVE: KAREN NARASAKI

OBAMA APPOINTEE MANAGES SOROS BACKED ELECTION FUND 

Fund focuses on ‘voters of color’ and ‘improving odds of electing candidates of choice’

BY  Joe Schoffstall

SEE: http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-appointee-manages-soros-backed-election-fund/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

An Obama administration appointee manages a fund that liberal billionaire George Soros uses to bankroll election-related activities like increasing the number of “voters of color” and “improving odds” of electing preferred candidates, actions that are discussed in recently released hacked documents.

Karen Narasaki, a commissioner of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, manages the Soros-backed Shelby Response Fund. The fund’s objective is “protecting voting rights in states formerly covered under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.”

A document uncovered by the group DC Leaks reveals the plans of Soros’s Open Society Foundations that are geared primarily toward minority voters.

“The focus of the portfolio, going forward, will be on voters of color—reducing barriers and fighting suppressive measures which impede access to the polls, increasing ease of registration and access to early voting, and improving odds of electing candidates of choice,” the document states. “We will also fund affirmative election reform measures that have been shown to better benefit people of color (i.e. same-day registration and early voting.)”

The document then describes funding of Census-related activities such as a “redesign of racial categories” as part of the group’s 2020 strategy.

“Advocates have about a year and a half to influence appropriations for the Census Bureau, the redesign of racial categories on the 2020 Census instrument and policy regarding how to count persons who are incarcerated,” the group wrote. “Census topics must be presented to Congress in April 2017 with final questions by April 2018.”

This goal would be achieved by putting money behind groups like the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO), the Leadership Conference, Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), and Demos, a public policy organization.

Grants would also be awarded to media groups to generate stories and “educate” journalists.

New America Media, a coalition of ethnic media outlets, was named as one such organization. New America Media partners with journalism schools across the United States.

“New America Media has been quite effective with the small grant it received from the Shelby Response Fund in generating voting stories in the ethnic media,” it says. “Funding an ethic media project in advance of the 50th Anniversary of the Voting Rights Act will be an opportunity to educate journalists, connect advocates with ethnic media outlets, and cover current issues as well as history. There is also a great need for communications trainings for advocates and perhaps the establishment of a hub.”

The Open Society Foundations wrote of its plan to challenge voter identification laws through litigation.

“The Shelby convening report has identified an ‘exploding’ need for litigation funding,” the document states, later adding, “2015 and 2016 will be critical years for the continuation of cases and the bringing of new cases under Section 2 and possible state voting rights acts that are passed—especially since a voter ID case is headed to the Supreme Court will be argued and decided 2015-2016.”

The Shelby Response Fund has received millions in contributions from just seven foundations, according to a separate document released by DC Leaks. The Open Society Foundations has been its biggest donor.

A spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations issued a statement about the hacked documents.

“A number of Open Society Foundations internal documents, including strategies, work plans, and funding requests, have been published after being removed from an online community that served as a resource for our staff, board members, and partners,” the spokesperson said. “In some cases, the materials reflect big-picture strategies over several years from within the Open Society Foundations network, which supports human rights, democratic practice, and the rule of law in more than 100 countries around the world. This attack is a symptom of an aggressive assault on civil society and human rights activists that is taking place globally.”

“The Open Society Foundations support efforts to encourage wider participation in U.S. elections, and opposes measures used to try to suppress voter participation,” the spokesperson said.

A top priority of Soros’s foundation is enlarging the U.S. electorate by at least 10 million voters by 2018, the Washington Free Beacon previously reported.

Soros has thrown millions behind legal challenges against voter identification laws in numerous states. These lawsuits are argued by Hillary Clinton’s top campaign lawyer, Marc Elias, who is acting independently of the campaign in his capacity as an attorney at the D.C-based law firm Perkins Coie.
______________________________________________________

FBI Says Election Hack 'Serious Threat'

Published on Aug 30, 2016

DHS, FBI and many national news publications all have recognized the serious threats to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Until Obama comes out and admit's the threat and accepts the past examples, we can never let him live down the words, "Rigged election, I don't even know what that means."

CONFIRMED: HUMA ABEDIN'S MOTHER LEADING SUPPORTER OF FEMALE MUSLIM GENITAL MUTILATION~ABEDIN'S HUSBAND'S SEXUAL MISCONDUCT AN ORCHESTRATED DISTRACTION

CONFIRMED: HUMA ABEDIN'S MOTHER LEADING SUPPORTER OF MUSLIM FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION 

THE DISTRACTION ORCHESTRATED 

TO GET THE FOCUS OFF HILLARY

Huma's Weinergate-What They're Hiding

Published on Aug 29, 2016

Human Abedin’s husband, disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner is back in the headlines, with his latest sexting scandal. The crotch photographs of Weiner, dated July 2015, just released, raise questions about the timing of this scandal. Is it a distraction from the serious issues surrounding Human Abedin’s ties to Saudi Arabia, her role in the Clinton Foundation “pay to play” scheme, and the controversial magazine she edited for years? Infowar’s Lee Ann McAdoo and Margaret Howell look at the latest. 

GOVERNOR OF MAINE REFUSES TO ENFORCE FEDERAL SURVEILLANCE EDICT

GOVERNOR OF MAINE REFUSES TO ENFORCE FEDERAL SURVEILLANCE EDICT 

BY  Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/23949-governor-of-maine-refuses-to-enforce-federal-surveillance-edict;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Last month, Governor Paul LePage of Maine (shown) was informed by the Obama administration that he would have to send to the U.S. Department of Commerce classified personal data on all recipients of state welfare funds. Specifically, LePage was being commanded to give the feds “access to data from [his] state’s food assistance, family assistance and welfare programs.”

The strong arm tactic didn’t set well with LePage, and his response is refreshing:

This is a bold request, considering almost every request Maine makes of the federal government is denied and our efforts at reform are generally met with a resounding "no." The Obama administration has been reflexively obstructionist in its dealings with Maine, particularly as they relate to our welfare programs, and now it expects cooperation with a request of its own regarding our welfare programs. It is important for President Obama and the entire federal government to know: states don’t work for you. Our relationship is a two-way street.

He ends the memo with a direct and defiant statement of his refusal to dance to the federal government’s tune:

To answer your question, I will absolutely not be directing Maine’s welfare program directors to enter into a data-sharing agreement with your staff for the purposes outlined in your letter….

Maine will not oblige the federal government’s requests while our own requests so routinely get denied or go unanswered by the federal government.

In fairness, it’s not as if Maine or LePage is an exemplar of state resistance to federal usurpation. The state and its chief executive routinely cooperate with the central government in a panoply of unconstitutional programs and policies.

Regardless, LePage’s stern refusal to bow to the bureaucracy’s edicts is praiseworthy.

In short, the principle upon which LePage’s position is based is called anti-commandeering, and it is a fundamental element of American constitutional construction; were it better understand and more universally applied by state lawmakers and executives, we could extricate ourselves overnight from the statist swamp into which we have wandered.

Put simply, anti-commandeering prohibits the federal government from forcing states to participate in any federal program that does not concern “international and interstate matters.”

While this expression of federalism (“dual sovereignty,” as it was named by Justice Antonin Scalia) was first set forth in the case of New York v. United States (1992), most recently it was reaffirmed by the high court in the case of Mack and Printz v. United States (1997).

Former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack was one of the named plaintiffs in the latter landmark case, and on the website of his organization, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, he recounts the basic facts of the case:

The Mack/Printz case was the case that set Sheriff Mack on a path of nationwide renown as he and Sheriff Printz sued the Clinton administration over unconstitutional gun control measures, were eventually joined by other sheriffs for a total of seven, went all the way to the Supreme Court and won.

There is much more “ammo” in this historic and liberty-saving Supreme Court ruling. We have been trying to get state and local officials from all over the country to read and study this most amazing ruling for almost two decades. Please get a copy of it today and pass it around to your legislators, county commissioners, city councils, state reps, even governors!

The Mack/Printz ruling makes it clear that the states do not have to accept orders from the feds.

Writing for the majority in the Printz decision, Justice Antonin Scalia explained:

As Madison expressed it: "The local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere." The Federalist No. 39, at 245. [n.11]

This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution's structural protections of liberty. Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.

Moreover, state lawmakers and governors are not left defenseless in the battle to fight the cancer of consolidation. There is a remedy — a “rightful remedy” — that can immediately retrench the federal government’s constant overreaching. This antidote can stop the poison of all unconstitutional federal acts and executive orders at the state borders and prevent them from working on the people.

The remedy for federal tyranny is nullification, and applying it liberally will leave our states and our nation healthier and happier.

In fact, if nullification is to be successfully deployed and defended, states must remember that the Constitution is a creature of the states and that the federal government was given very few and very limited powers over objects of national importance. Any act of Congress, the courts, or the president that exceeds that small scope is null, void, and of no legal effect. No exceptions.

James Madison said it best in Federalist, No. 45, “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

That our Founders understood this principle is demonstrated by Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist, No. 78:

There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.

James Madison, also writing in The Federalist, recommended that state legislators, in order to prevent federal abridgment of fundamental liberties, should refuse “to co-operate with the officers of the Union.”

Founding era jurist Joseph Story described the Second Amendment’s critical check on tyranny: "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”

So, while Maine may not be the Shangri-La of state sovereignty, the action taken by LePage reminds Washington, D.C. that the states are not drill-sergeants sworn to follow orders issued by the commanders on Capitol Hill. 

In fact, the states created the federal government, and should the latter cease serving the former’s purposes, the power to create includes the power to abrogate. The federal government would be wise to remember their subordinate, enumerated, and limited role in the constitutional confederacy finalized in Philadelphia in 1787.

CENSORSHIP: DR. DREW SHOW CANCELED AFTER QUESTIONING HILLARY CLINTON'S HEALTH

"Hillary's Health" Crisis Prompts Orwellian Censorship

Published on Aug 30, 2016

The establishment is in total panic mode, attempting to censor any hint of problems with a Hillary Clinton presidency. All while the Obama Administration has announced it's plans to hand over US protection of the internet with a UN takeover being the most likely scenario.


The Huffington Post has sensationally censored an article pertaining to questions about Hillary Clinton’s health and banned the journalist who wrote it from posting on their website altogether.
Google users attempting to search for information regarding presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s health are fed search suggestions that have nothing to do with the issue, many on Twitter pointed out Saturday.
Google has altered its search algorithm to prevent searches for “Clinton body count” from auto-completing, despite the term auto-completing when typed in on virtually any other search engine.

HILLARY'S CENSORSHIP OF FREE SPEECH; WHAT WE CAN EXPECT FROM HER 

IF ELECTED PRESIDENT

DR. DREW SHOW CANCELED AFTER QUESTIONING HILLARY CLINTON'S HEALTH 

Published on Aug 27, 2016

Just days after Dr. Drew Pinsky aired his concerns about Hillary’s health his show which was running for 5 years was suddenly canceled!

 http://www.infowars.com/dr-drew-show-...

Published on Aug 25, 2016

Dr. Drew's show was canceled by HLN just one week after he admitted Hillary Clinton has health problems and is gravely concerned about her. KABC Radio also scrubbed their article about Dr. Drew's concerns after his statements went viral trying to prevent more people from investigating Hillary's Health. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.

Published on Aug 26, 2016

On Thursday, the HLN cable network announced they would cancel Dr. Drew Pinsky’s show, “Dr. Drew On Call,” giving little more details than to say they had “mutually agreed to air the final episode of his show on September 22.”

But merely eight days earlier, Dr. Drew had presented some startling revelations regarding Hillary’s health, stating he was “gravely concerned… not just about her health, but her health care.”

Google users curious why renowned celebrity physician Dr. Drew Pinsky’s show was canceled are wanting to know what exactly he said about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

FBI RAIDS FORMER COLLEGE BOARD EXECUTIVE'S HOME AFTER "MASSIVE" BREACH

FBI RAIDS FORMER COLLEGE BOARD EXECUTIVE'S HOME AFTER "MASSIVE" BREACH 

BY DR. SUSAN BERRY

SEE: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/29/fbi-raids-former-college-board-execs-home-hunt-massive-sat-college-entrance-breach/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The FBI is looking at evidence from the Maryland home of a former official of the College Board as part of a probe into a serious breach of hundreds of test questions from the SAT college entrance exam.

Federal agents seized computers and other materials from Manuel Alfaro, former executive director of assessment design and development at the College Board. Alfaro had contacted government officials from seven states, making accusations his former employer lied about its tests in bids for state contracts.

According to Reuters – to whom about 400 test questions from the newly Common Core-aligned SAT were leaked – a search warrant reveals the FBI “is investigating alleged computer intrusion and theft against an unidentified ‘victim corporation’ involving ‘confidential or proprietary information,’ including tests, test forms and internal emails.”

The news agency’s report states Alfaro accused the College Board – which also produces the Advanced Placement tests – of deceiving states that have given the test company public contracts to use the SAT as their official assessment measure for high school students. He alleged the College Board misled these states regarding its process to create questions for the newly designed SAT, an action that ultimately resulted in an inadequate measure.

Alfaro – who left his position at the College Board in February of 2015 – also used his LinkedIn account to publicly post his accusations against the standardized testing giant. In a post on Sunday titled “Department of Education Heads of the States Using the SAT for Accountability Should Resign Immediately,” Alfaro asserted that he had contacted the heads of the Departments of Education (DOE) of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, and New Hampshire to inform them of his allegations.

He warns residents of these seven states that their officials “have failed to protect the best interests of your students and your families, opting instead to protect their own interests and the interests of the College Board.”

On May 25, Alfaro posted a letter he sent to the heads of the DOEs of the states, reminding them that he had previously contacted them on May 7 “to let you know that the College Board had made false claims in proposals it submitted in bids for assessment contracts with your states.”

Reuters adds:

In a May 7 email to the education chiefs for those states, Alfaro said that while he was a College Board employee, he “became aware of patterns of concealment, fabrication, and deception used by the College Board to misrepresent the SAT and PSAT.” He alleged that the College Board didn’t follow the process to develop the SAT and PSAT that it publicly says it uses.

Alfaro – who directed the development of parts of the newly designed SAT that was announced would be aligned with the Common Core standards – charged that the College Board had omitted “a crucial step in the test development process, which he says resulted in a lower-quality exam.” On June 1, Alfaro posted that skipping that step could mean the College Board was non-compliant with federal guidance regarding peer review for state testing programs.

Alfaro wrote to the DOEs of the seven states that, on May 10, he received a letter from the College Board’s attorneys informing him that they were investigating his allegations. He wrote that while he refused to meet with the attorneys representing the assessment company, he did offer to have a “Q & A” session with the College Board itself, and to meet with the states’ legal teams so that he could “prove my allegations and claims.”

In his letter to the DOE heads, Alfaro indicates none of them responded to his letter.

“I began my disclosures with your states because you are in a unique position to quickly verify my claims,” Alfaro wrote. “Your contracts with the College Board contain clauses that give you access to College Board records at any time.”

In his public accusations against the College Board on LinkedIn, Alfaro tells citizens of the seven states that their current heads of the DOEs “have failed you” due to their failure to respond to his charges that the College Board “has committed global fraud against their states and the federal government.”

He adds:

The heads of the Department of Education of your states clearly lack the critical reasoning skills (and the common sense) and basic knowledge of test development required to make good decisions on behalf of the millions of children in their care. This reason alone is enough to demand their immediate resignation.

The College Board saved approximately 17 million dollars by taking shortcuts in the development of a product that affects the lives of millions of students every year. This is how the College Board can afford to offer the SAT to states for about $12 per student.

Breitbart News reached out for comment to the heads of the Maine and Michigan Departments of Education but received no response.

Reuters reports College Board spokesman Zach Goldberg said about the raid on Alfaro’s home, “We are pleased that this crime is being pursued aggressively,” adding that Alfaro’s charges concerning the development of the new SAT were “patently false.”

The College Board’s chief attorney Peter Schwartz reportedly referred to Alfaro as a “disgruntled former employee.”

According to the news agency, U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) is looking into Alfaro’s allegations.

The SAT breach is “a problem of a massive level,” one that could “put into question the credibility of the exam,” Neal Kingston, director of the Achievement and Assessment Institute at the University of Kansas, said about the leak of test items.

The College Board has been managing multiple breaches of SAT test material for years, leaving questions about the actual validity of the test. The current massive breach comes at a time when some states and school districts are replacing the Common Core-aligned PARCC and Smarter Balanced Tests with the SAT as the official measure of proficiency of their high school students.

In its prior report, Reuters suggested the College Board’s lack of security around the exam itself is a serious matter:

Internal documents reviewed by this news agency showed that material for past exams had been “compromised,” a term the College Board uses to describe tests whose contents have leaked outside the organization.

In February, Reuters asked the College Board how it went about protecting exam materials. Spokesman Zach Goldberg described the organization’s use of lock boxes to help prevent the theft of SAT booklets sent to international testing locations.

But lock boxes, he acknowledged, “would not preclude a leak that originated earlier in the content development and distribution cycle.”

The news agency reported that in response to an East Asian industry’s discovery of how to take advantage of the College Board’s regular practice of using the same items over again from prior tests, the testing company said it would improve its security for the exam.

“University admissions officers, however, continue to voice concerns to College Board officials about reuse of exams,” Reuters reported. “If the College Board can’t keep test material secure, schools are left with the impossible task of determining whether an applicant saw questions before taking the exam and therefore gained an unfair edge.”

Since 2012, the College Board has been led by CEO David Coleman, also known as the “architect” of the highly unpopular Common Core standards. In the name of social justice, Coleman’s goal has been to align the SAT college entrance exam with the nationalized standards in the hopes of allowing more low-income and minority students to gain entrance to college.

Many education experts and college professors have referred to the aligning of the SAT to the Common Core as a further “dumbing down” of standards to force regular state colleges to accept the low-level college-readiness offered by the Common Core.

UPDATE:

Breitbart News reached out for comment to the heads of the Maine and Michigan Departments of Education. While the Maine Department of Education did not respond, Martin Ackley, director of Office of Public and Governmental Affairs at the Michigan Department of Education emailed the following statement:

The Michigan Department of Education looked into the matter and found out that Mr. Alfaro worked at the College Board for 21 months and was considered not to be speaking with any authority about its tests.

In redesigning the SAT, the College Board reports its unprecedented commitment to transparency and has published its test specifications, which include the test development process used to develop the test.

When the College Board became aware of Mr. Alfaro’s allegations, they reached out to him through their counsel to ask if he would provide them with more information so they could assess the substance of his claims, but he declined that request.

The Michigan Department of Education, as with the College Board, would look into any other detail should Mr. Alfaro provide it.

TRUMP CAMPAIGN WEBSITE SELLING "LGBTQ FOR TRUMP" T-SHIRTS & PINS

TRUMP CAMPAIGN WEBSITE SELLING 

"LGBTQ FOR TRUMP" T-SHIRTS & PINS 

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/08/29/trump-campaign-website-selling-lgbtq-for-trump-t-shirts-pins/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The website for the presidential campaign of Republican nominee Donald Trump is selling “LGBTQ for Trump” t-shirts and pins, drawing applause from some and disappointment from others.

“Show your pride and your support for Trump with this exclusive equality tee,” the store page for the t-shirt, available as the “Trump pride men’s tee,” reads.

The shirt, swiped with rainbow colors and bearing the phrase “LGBTQ for Trump,” is available for $30 while the pin sells for two for $5.

Chris Barron of LGBT for Trump and GOProud praised the campaign’s offering of homosexual apparel, Tweeting, “@realDonaldTrump makes history again. First GOP Presidential candidate to do LGBT outreach merchandise! LOVE IT!”

Garison Carrell of the Log Cabin Republicans did the same, posting, “The absolute most pro-gay candidate. Thank you @realDonaldTrump #GaysforTrump #LGBT #Election2016”

But Cary Gordon, pastor of Cornerstone World Outreach in Sioux City, Iowa, expressed sorrow over the development.

“From Donald Trump’s campaign website… You can buy pro-gay pride Trump for President t-shirts. Tell me again how the Church should ignore and dishonor Exodus 18:21 to help this wicked assistant to the enemy of religious liberty so they can ‘stop’ a ‘greater evil,'” he Tweeted on Sunday.

Gordon was referring to the biblical mandate to select rulers  “such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness.”

The Constitution Party of Tennessee likewise conveyed its dismay over the matter.

“Donald J. Trump becomes the first Republican presidential candidate to offer official pro-LGBTQ merchandise with the unveiling of ‘LGBTQ for Trump’ apparel. If Trump will do this, what won’t he do?” it opined.

Screenshot of store page

As previously reported, Trump declared at a fundraiser in June that he is the best candidate for the “gay community.”

“So you tell me, who’s better for the gay community, and who’s better for women than Donald Trump? Believe me!” he said.

During his acceptance speech last month, Trump told those gathered that he would work to protect homosexuals if elected.

“As president, I will do everything in my power to protect LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology,” Trump declared, being met with applause.

“And, I have to say, as a Republican, it is so nice to hear you cheering for what I just said,” he said in response.

In February, he also replied in the affirmative when asked by a lesbian reporter if the nation can expect “more forward motion” on homosexual issues if elected president.

Both Trump and Clinton have declared that they are the best choice for the “LBGT community.”

“We will defend all our rights—civil rights, human rights and voting rights—women’s rights and workers’ rights—LGBT rights and the rights of people with disabilities!” Clinton declared during her acceptance speech a week after Trump made his remarks.

The previous month, she marched in New York City’s “gay pride” parade, posting numerous Tweets that day about the issue, including a video of the Democratic candidate speaking at a homosexual and transgender community center.

“[P]art of what I want to do as president is to keep not only our campaign for full equality going, but also to turn our attention with the help of so many like you to speak out and work for giving others around the world the opportunity to be who they are, love who they choose, [and] have the kind of future they deserve,” she said in the clip.

DC-LEAKS WEBSITE ATTACKED FOR RELEASING SOROS' DOCUMENTS

DC-LEAKS WEBSITE ATTACKED 

FOR RELEASING SOROS' DOCUMENTS 

Published on Aug 29, 2016

DCLeaks, a website that releases information on powerful political figures, has had part of its website taken offline after releasing a cache of documents on billionaire donor George Soros.