Translate

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

PRO "BREXIT" MOVIE MASTERFULLY EXPOSES EUROPEAN UNION HORROR SHOW

Pro-Brexit Movie Masterfully Exposes EU Horror Show
TRAILER:

PRO "BREXIT" MOVIE MASTERFULLY EXPOSES EUROPEAN UNION HORROR SHOW
BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23228-pro-brexit-movie-masterfully-exposes-eu-horror-show; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

There are more than 100 European Union laws that govern pillows. Almost 500 EU laws cover towels. More than 65 EU laws deal with bathrooms. A “mere” 31 EU laws cover toothbrushes, while close to 50 govern toothpaste, and more than 170 deal with mirrors. And that is all just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the super-state's radical lawmaking. Yet, the people of Europe have no clue what those laws say, how they were made, by whom, or even for what purpose. More importantly, perhaps, they have no way of getting rid of the laws or those who usurped the power to make them.
But now, thanks to the “British Exit” (Brexit) referendum coming up on June 23, the British people have what may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to secede from the out-of-control super-state that has taken over their lives. And the new film Brexit: The Movie, which highlighted the dizzying array of EU laws listed here, may be the best resource yet for explaining the necessity of restoring Britain's independence. Best of all, it is available for free.     
In a little more than an hour, the hard-hitting documentary gives a thorough overview of the many dangers posed by the EU. One commentator interviewed in the film compares EU membership with being shackled to a rotting corpse. The analogy is fitting in more ways than one. Another source interviewed in the film says, “The EU is turning into a dictatorship, and this is not overstating it.” And indeed, the movie makes a powerful case that a dangerous dictatorship is exactly what the EU is becoming.
The film does an especially great job of debunking the myths and fear-mongering being peddled by pro-EU apparatchiks in the establishment and beyond. A brief tour through Switzerland, which is by far Europe's most successful nation on every metric yet and which has fiercely resisted pressure to join the EU, drives the point home perfectly. Britain can regain its sovereignty, and at the same time benefit immensely as a result.   
“This is the most important voting decision that any of us is going to make in our lifetime,” says James Delingpole, a hilariously witty British journalist, in the film. “With general elections it doesn't really matter who you vote for, Conservative or Labor, because you know that in four years time you can change your mind. This time, you can't change your mind.” Numerous other entertaining and knowledgeable experts, journalists, economists, politicians, authors, and EU critics interviewed for the film explain why the people of Britain must seize the chance to regain their independence and their liberties.   
The documentary does a great job exposing the sinister underside of EU policymaking — it happens completely outside of public scrutiny, and is essentially impossible for citizens to stop. Among other clever strategies for illustrating that, the filmmakers show people on the street photographs of top EU bosses. “Do you recognize this man?” they ask. Of course, nobody does.
Other questions include ones asking passers-by whether they know the difference between the European Council, the Council of Europe, and the Council of the European Union. Obviously, the response from everyone is confusion at best. Essentially, the EU is an impenetrable morass of out-of-control bureaucracy. It is also a monster at odds with the fundamental principles of liberty and Western civilization. And the film makes that abundantly clear in a funny, entertaining, and powerful way.  
Even British lawmakers interviewed in the film admit they do not understand how the EU system works. One parliamentarian, David Davis, compares the EU's bureaucracy to a “priesthood that knows how it all works.” “The rest of us ordinary citizens don't know how it works,” he said, adding that it leads to a “massive transfer of power.”
And that is the point: The architects of the regime did not want everyday people to understand it. As journalist and author Janet Daley explains in the film, “It was devised so that the great mass of the people could not control government, ever again.” The implications of that fact alone ought to be more than enough to persuade people to rise up and vote for secession. But that's only the beginning.        
Another key element of the film is the highlighting of the economic destruction wrought on the British economy by EU laws and regulations. “Fortress Europe,” as the narrator refers to the super-state, has been a “calamity” to the European economy. That is backed up by great amounts of evidence.  
In particular, the movie shows how eurocrats in Brussels helped to crush the livelihoods of countless British fishermen, who for centuries have fished the waters of the British isles. Remarkably, the EU has even started paying British ex-fishermen with tax money to allow their boats to be destroyed. Also under threat because of the EU are British exporters in everything from candy to heavy manufacturing. With interviews of the EU's economic victims, the film does a magnificent job of putting a human face on the massive tragedy the EU has inflicted.
Eurocrats, by contrast, do quite well for themselves. Among other perks, the armies of faceless bureaucrats and other busybodies earn massively bloated salaries, absurd benefits, gargantuan “expense” accounts, and much more, living a life of luxury that the everyday taxpayers who fund it all could not even begin to contemplate.
The film gives a brief overview of these benefits, and suggests that it is one of the reasons why support for the EU is so fervent among the political and bureaucratic classes that benefit from the arrangements. Watching it all roll by on film, the parallels between the lifestyles and attitudes of the EU's ruling classes and those of the communist elite in China or the Soviet Union are hard to ignore.
Just as importantly, the eurocrats have become masters at strategically buying support for their machinations with other people's money. The EU “diverts great rivers of taxpayers' cash to the tax-consuming middle class intelligentsia in our sprawling publicly funded establishment,” the narrator of the film observes.
“The European Union is very good at purchasing the loyalty of powerful and articulate interests in all the member states,” says Daniel Hannan, a member of the European pseudo-“Parliament” with the U.K. Independence Party and a leading critic of the super-state. “What we see here is really a racket.” Numerous others echo those concerns.  
Indeed, massive amounts of taxpayer funding are showered on everything from museums and universities to lobbying groups and charities. That provides a built-in layer of support for the EU, of course, but is a huge burden on those unwittingly forced to fund it — not to mention inimical to the interests of everyday citizens.
Showcasing an EU-funded opera house in the Northeast Britain, for example, the film points out that for every one pound of EU funding returned to the area, taxpayers fork over almost 2.5 pounds to Brussels. In short, massive taxation without representation to fund propaganda and useless support-buying projects.            
The film also touches on Britain's history. Despite the successful uprising by American colonists against the British crown, it is true that Britain has been responsible for some of humanity's greatest advances in individual liberty. The Brexit movie highlights, among other examples, the world-famous Magna Carta. Also highlighted is the rise of the principle that the people must consent to taxes and government through elected representatives before they can be legitimate. Under the EU, over a thousand years of traditions in liberty and self-government pioneered by the Anglo-Saxon world are in mortal danger — at least on the British Isles.  
The Brexit film highlights another major potential danger emerging from the EU's machinations: the rise of totalitarian extremism, ranging from radical leftists and communists to racist and fascist forces that some of the film's interviewees mistakenly refer to as “far-right.” (Having collectivist tyranny such as fascism and socialism on opposite ends of a political spectrum makes no logical sense, as it leaves no place on the spectrum for liberty and limited government). In the documentary, footage of frightening fascist-style marches with Nazi-style symbols, uniforms, and torches overlaid with eerie music is sure to leave a lasting impression on viewers.    
If there can be any criticism of the film, it is that it does not properly explain the shadowy globalist establishment — the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg group, and other like-minded outfits — that has publicly boasted of its crucial role in foisting the super-state on Europeans. Without understanding the powers behind the EU, it is hard to understand the real agenda, and why it is so crucial that Europeans, and the British in particular, fight back. The film also provides no mention of the well-documented role of the U.S. government, via the CIA and other agencies, in imposing the scheme on Europeans. Nor is the deception that was used given its due.
Unfortunately, the film also relies heavily on the term “democracy,” a system of government America's Founders rejected as unstable mob rule that jeopardizes individual rights — God-given rights that the Founders believed should be protected by law under a republican form of government. The film could have instead used better terminology to describe what is really at stake: self-government, democratic accountability, the rule of law, decentralized power, individual liberty, and so on.
The movie also leaves out some of the more terrifying anti-democratic elements of the EU, including its ongoing efforts to build itself a military loyal only to Brussels that would enforce its decrees, beyond the control of the people. Such a force would be an extreme danger, yet the EU's efforts to usurp control of Britain's armed forces are not addressed.  
Still, despite those failings, the film does a masterful job of showing Britons and other Europeans why they must urgently and decisively reject the EU — at least if they hope to retain any semblance of liberty, nationhood, self-government, and prosperity. After seeing the devastating indictment of the EU, it is hard to imagine any argument that could persuade any logical person (who did not hate freedom and prosperity) that Britain should remain shackled to the totalitarian super-state. That means the film successfully accomplishes what its makers and funders set out to do: truthfully expose the EU in an entertaining, easy-to-understand way, such that the people of Britain will realize the necessity of secession.   
The film is a must-see for every European, whether they live in the United Kingdom or not. If enough Europeans see it, the EU will almost certainly collapse amid a public uprising. There is not enough tax-funded propaganda in the world that could prop up the autocratic super-state in the face of the truth so eloquently showcased in the film.
As the Obama administration and establishment Republicans in Congress attempt to shackle Americans to the EU super-state via the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), even the people of the United States should see it. The film would be an excellent warning of why America should avoid like the plague any entangling alliances with the regime in Brussels.
In short, Brexit: The Movie could be a very valuable tool for throwing a monkey wrench into the globalist agenda. And it's available for free on the Internet. Use it.
Related articles:


YALE ANNOUNCES "GENDER NEUTRAL" RESTROOMS AHEAD OF COMMENCEMENT

Ivy League School Puts Dozens Of Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Across Campus
TAMAR GENDLER, LEFT;
OUTSIDE THE GNOSTIC WORLD OF LIBERAL ACADEMIA, 
THE SIGNAL HAS TURNED RED
YALE ANNOUNCES "GENDER NEUTRAL" RESTROOMS AHEAD OF COMMENCEMENT 

‘This Is About Public Signaling’

BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/05/23/this-is-about-public-signaling-yale-announces-gender-neutral-restrooms-ahead-of-commencement/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — Ahead of Yale’s commencement ceremony on Monday, the university announced the opening of more than 300 “gender neutral” restrooms for use on campus.
The Yale Office of LGBTQ Resources posted an interactive map on the university website to provide directions to the various locations on campus.
“Yale aims to be a leader on this front,” Tamar Gendler, dean of Yale’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences told the Associated Press. “Part of what is important about the all-gender bathroom project and about putting it at the top of our commencement site, is this is about public signaling.”
As previously reported, in 2013, the university announced that it was considering including sex change operations in Yale’s student insurance policy, and later approved the move. The school also now accommodates students’ requests to be referred to by their preferred pronouns, and includes their preferred name rather than their birth name on their diploma.
Yale also made headlines for presenting a four-day workshop called “Sex Weekend.” During one workshop, some students admitted experimenting with masochism or bestiality.
“People do engage in some of these activities that we believe only, for example, perverts engage in,” said event organizer Guilana Berry. “What the goal is, is to increase compassion for people who may engage in activities that are not what you would personally consider normal.”
Students also had an opportunity to submit discussion topics anonymously. According to a report in the Yale Daily News, a number of submissions related to “sexual fantasies involving family members.”
“At first, yes, the fact that so many people brought it up surprised me, but then I thought it might be more of a psychological thing we might all have,” said student Alex Saeedy. “I think that’s what the point of the workshop was — to bring up things we thought were so taboo, and desires or urges we criticize are just regular parts of sexual psychology.”
But other students decried the event, stating that the university should be ashamed that such material was being presented on campus.
Yale, like a number of historic universities, has Christian roots. Carrying the motto “Light and Truth,” Yale was founded as a college to train ministers and political leaders. A group of ten local pastors joined together to fill the university’s library, and Pastor Ezra Stiles, one of the school’s early presidents, required all freshmen to study Hebrew, so that they could read the Old Testament in its original language.
“All scholars shall live religious, godly and blameless lives according to the rules of God’s word, diligently reading the Scriptures…” read the requirements for students in 1745.
Jonathan Edwards, known for his sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” went to Yale at age 13 and was ordained for the ministry in 1727.
Today, Yale Law School is considered one of the most prestigious legal institutions in the nation.


THE BASICS OF ISLAM 7: ROBERT SPENCER ON HOW COULD ISIS REPRESENT 1.5 BILLION MUSLIMS?

THE BASICS OF ISLAM 7: ROBERT SPENCER ON HOW COULD ISIS REPRESENT 
1.5 BILLION MUSLIMS? 

TRANSGENDER BAPTIST PREACHER SAYS THE BIBLE IS WRONG ABOUT GAYS!~CLAIMS AN ANGEL TOLD HIM SO!

TRANSGENDER BAPTIST PREACHER SAYS THE BIBLE IS WRONG ABOUT GAYS!~CLAIMS AN ANGEL TOLD HIM SO! 
ALLYSON ROBINSON & PARTNER DANYELLE
Changing the Uniform: Allyson Robinson & Danyelle Robinson
Galatians 1:8-"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."


Rev. Allyson Robinson: The Three Temptations of the Affirming Church


I am transgender: Allyson Robinson at TEDx Nightingale Bamford School
Published on Jun 1, 2014
As principal of her own boutique consulting firm, Warrior Poet Strategies, Allyson Robinson advises select clients in organizational design, change strategy, diversity management, and movement entrepreneurship. Previously, she led internal and external diversity initiatives at the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest LGBT civil rights organization, where she conceived, created, and launched the organization's social enterprise to train large organizations in diversity and inclusion. She later became the first transgender person to lead a national LGBT advocacy organization as executive director of OutServe-SLDN. In that role, she developed and coordinated the public vetting of Secretary of Defense nominee Chuck Hagel on LGBT issues, getting him to make a decisive, written commitment to equality prior to his confirmation. She has also served as an Army officer and an ordained Baptist pastor, studied at West Point, Oxford University, and Arizona State, and earned degrees in physics and theology. Allyson, her wife of 19 years, and their four children live in the Washington, D.C. suburbs.


Sunday, May 22, 2016

COMING OUT: HERSHEY PARK ALLOWS TRANSGENDERS INTO ALL BATHROOMS~COPIES TARGET STORES POLICY~SOME BOYCOTTING OR CANCELLING SEASON PASSES FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE

POLITICALLY CORRECT 

NON-JUDGEMENTAL INCLUSIVITY 

AT PLAYLAND, FLUSHES AWAY MORALS; 

PUTS GUESTS AT RISK OF PERVERTS LOOKING FOR FUN IN BATHROOMS


Hersheypark Announces Commitment 

to Allowing Men Who Identify as Women 

to Use Women’s Restrooms

BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/05/22/hersheypark-announces-commitment-to-allowing-men-who-identify-as-women-to-use-womens-restrooms/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

HERSHEY, Pa. — A Pennsylvania amusement park that is a popular attraction for families with children has announced that its internal policies allow visitors and employees to use the restroom that correlates with their “gender identity.”
Hersheypark officials released a statement on Friday outlining that its restroom accommodations have already been in place and will continue.
“We recognize that the more perspectives we have within our company, the more welcoming we are to all those who visit and seek employment here,” said Public Relations Manager Kathy Burrows. “In fact, our company has four core values, one of which is ‘respectful of others,’ which we define as treating all people with dignity, while respecting their differences and ideas.”
“For decades, Hersheypark has been dedicated to the safety and security of our guest and employees. It is foundational to our brand,” she continued. “Additionally, the Park has and will always strive to accommodate all guests and employees—including members of the LGBT community—to ensure those visiting or working at Hersheypark are comfortable and feel secure.”
Burrows then outlined that visitors and employees may therefore use whichever restroom correlates with their gender identity, or may use a family restroom if they prefer.
“To that end, the park will continue its practice of treating all guests and employees the same no matter race, ethnicity, sexual identity, etc.,” she said. “Guests and employees may continue to use the restrooms with which they gender-identify, or are welcome to use the many family restrooms available across the destination.”
Reaction to the announcement has been mixed, with some praising Hershey’s policy and others threatening not to frequent the famed amusement park.
“Hershey has stood behind the philosophy of diversity and inclusion for many years and you’re just learning about this now in light of recent events. I am a former employee in administration and this is nothing new. Has it negatively impacted your life in any way before? Don’t expect much to change now,” wrote commenter Toni Arnette under PennLive’s report of the matter.
“As a former Milton Hershey student, I can guarantee you you that Mr. Hershey would not approve of this being allowed to go on,” commenter Keith Stevens opined. “What gender God created you is what bathroom you should be using. This nation was built upon morals and biblical principles, which is exactly why this nation became the most powerful and wealthiest in the world ever, and our government has been slowly destroying it.”
Michael Geer, the president of the Pennsylvania Family Institute, likewise relayed that the national discussion on restroom use has generated much concern.
“Ultimately, what this Hershey policy and what Target’s policies and what these laws are saying is anybody can have access to any restroom they want based on what they think is in their head,” he told local television station WHTM. “Most people that we talk to, especially women, are very concerned about who is going to come in behind them.”
“To go this far, following pressure from outside groups, I think it will cause many families to wonder if Hersheypark is going to be on their destination list this year,” he said.
But Andy Hoover, legislative director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, said that he thought the policy would actually be beneficial for business.
“Businesses recognize that to be competitive they have to be welcoming and open to everyone, and that’s exactly what Hersheypark is doing here,” he said.
_______________________________________________________

Hersheypark says guests, staff may choose their restroom preference


ARE WE SAFE AT HERSHEYPARK???? WHY???
"GENDER FLUID" BATHROOM POLICY COMES OUT 



GERMANY: 40,000 CHRISTIANS PERSECUTED BY MUSLIMS

Muslim persecution Christian refugees Germany
40,000 Christians persecuted by Muslims…
in Germany
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/40000-christians-persecuted-by-muslims-in-germany; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A hint of what’s to come for Germany and Europe in general. Do German authorities really believe that these migrants will settle down and become loyal and productive citizens?
“40,000 Christians Persecuted By Muslims In Germany,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, May 10, 2016 (thanks to Filip):
A new study shows that potentially thousands of Christians have been attacked and harassed in German migrant homes by Muslim guards and fellow migrants.
Multiple human rights organizations are warning the German government of the conditions that Christians in asylum homes are being subjected to. One organization in particular has chronicled 231 specific cases of the harassment of Christians by Muslim migrants and Muslim security guards in asylum homes.
Open Doors is a humanitarian relief organization that specializes in helping Christians who are persecuted worldwide. Markus Rode, a member of the group, said that the study is only “the tip of the iceberg” and called for more action to address the problem Frankfurter Allgemeine reports.
The report from Open Doors chronicles varying types of abuse. Christians in the study came mostly from Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan and were recent converts to the faith.
Breitbart London has reported many times of the challenges of migrants who have chosen to forgo Islam and convert to Christianity. Many converts wished to do so in their homelands, but in places like Iran and Afghanistan the penalty for leaving the Islamic religion can be death and so they fled to Europe. Now in European asylum homes they are finding more and more that they are in as much danger from radical Muslims in Europe as they were in their home countries.
The most prevalent form of abuse was verbal insults with 96 people saying that had received abuse or threats. Eighty-six said they had been physically assaulted and 73 said they had been subjected to death threats against themselves and family members. Three quarters of the migrants also said they had been victims of multiple attacks.
The perpetrators of most of the attacks were fellow migrants who look down on converts and believe them to be apostates. Perhaps, more interestingly was the prevalence of Muslim security guards who participated in the attacks. Almost half of those surveyed said they had received abuse from security guards and in the German capital of Berlin the figure rose to two-thirds. Many of the security guards hired to keep order and protect migrants regularly come from migrant backgrounds themselves and even more often have no qualifications.
Volker Baumann of Action for Persecuted Christians (AVC) says the situation is far bigger than 231 migrants, claiming that up to 40,000 Christians are persecuted for their faith in Germany according to the group’s research….
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/10/40000-christians-harassed-muslims/
http://www.infowars.com/report-christians-gays-women-fleeing-asylum-centres-due-to-persecution-by-muslim-men/
http://www.infowars.com/report-2015-saw-most-violent-persecution-of-christians-in-modern-history/ 

OBAMA - FIRST PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY TO PUT A MAN IN A WOMAN'S BATHROOM


http://freedomoutpost.com/
OBAMA - FIRST PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY TO PUT A MAN IN A WOMAN'S BATHROOM
BY REV. DAVID WHITNEY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

It has been an interesting week. I don’ t know if any of you receive hate email, I received one this week that was more vicious than most others. If the writer believed in hell he was essentially commanding me to go there - and immediately. I probably shouldn’t have bothered to read it to the end, but it struck me that these who preach the message of tolerance are some of the most intolerant and vicious people on the face of planet earth. I think it was the same day that I received junk mail from my Alma Mater. I usually toss that stuff in the circular file, but I opened this one.
Video of the sermon:
It was a fund raising letter from the Alumni Association at Rutgers. The literature urged me to give to one of ten causes at the University, one of which caught my attention - LGBTQA. Of the last three the T is receiving a great deal of promotion from the likes of Bruce Jenner. He is still Bruce no matter what he claims, he is still biologically male, every cell of his body proclaims that reality in spite of what his disordered mind believes - he cannot change reality by thinking he would like it to be different than it actually is. No amount of bodily mutilation or injections of hormones will change reality.
But majority of Americans reject this delusion. One million former customers of Target have decided a retailer committed to this perversion isn’t worthy of their patronage, nor of the risk that store’s decision places upon children and women. Several State governments are standing against this evil, notably North Carolina - I pray they will not cave into the Fascist pressure from the White House and the so called Department of Justice.
Now in that fund raising letter I know what the Q stands for but I don't know or care what the A stands for. All that means to me is that there is a whole new category of perversion they are promoting. So here is my Alma Mater asking me to fund a program to further the cause of the sexual disordered on campus. To help them feel good about their sin, to teach them that it is good and even righteous to act in violation of God’s Law, to even pervert the very nature of what God has made them to be. That is what passes for an education at Rutgers and all other Ivy League Schools - teaching students to not only disobey God’s Law, but teaching them to over throw God’s Law. And not only to do this in their personal life, but even more disastrously to bring about a radical and fundamental transformation of America into a land rife with the abomination of sodomy, teaching people to reject who God has made them to be and at the core of their being to reject God altogether.
In short this along with many other universities in our land are nothing short of synagogues of Satan, blatantly teaching and promoting the Satanic agenda for the lives of their students and advancing the Satanic agenda of a radical transformation of our land into the kingdom of Satan. I would not recommend my Alma Mater to any student looking for a institution of higher education. In fact one should be very cautious about any so called institution of higher education including many that call themselves Christian.
Many of these have succumbed at this point to the sodomite agenda. I read of a very well known “Christian” university that hired a staff member in their drama department. Later it was revealed he was a sodomite. When asked about it by a Christian broadcaster the school official responded, when we hire someone, we are not concerned about their personal life, just their credentials and job performance. So they are not concerned that such a staff member will have a corrupting effect on the student body! They are certainly not alone in this type of approach to so called Christian higher education. In fact it we need to remind ourselves of what true education is as given to us in the Word of God. Proverbs 1:7 “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.”
Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

WHY I DUMPED TED CRUZ FOR DONALD TRUMP


WHY I DUMPED TED CRUZ FOR DONALD TRUMP
BY RONNIE HERNE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Dear Ted –
I was in the middle of composing an article on you when you quit the race, “suspending my campaign” wasn't that how you put it? So I dropped both you and the article.
But just recently you really ticked me off! I got this freakish “Air Telegram” from you (in my regular mail) stridently begging me for money AFTER YOU'D ALREADY QUIT THE RACE! You said, and I Quote:
[LAST CHANCE TO “DUMP TRUMP” AVOID GOP DISASTER... STAND UP FOR YOUR VALUES... DONATE TODAY! Transmission: 10:06 AM Houston, Texas [not dated]]
So I'm resurrecting my article, Ted. It was a “Dear Ted” Dear John. I was explaining how I went from being ALL IN for you to finally, and firmly, setting you completely and unconditionally aside in order to back Trump to victory.
And I'm including right here your own words on party unity back in 2012. Sad how hatred has turned your heart, Ted. (This recently released interview [6 minutes] also includes your own words, Ted, on Heidi's involvement with the CFR.)
Just so it's all very clear to you, Ted, I am standing up for my values. Donald Trump may be a frog complete with the warts but he's the prince that is singing my song. And he's singing it directly to me, Ted. Do you get it?
Back in the day, I was so proud of you! Proud of you getting elected Texas senator. Proud of you telling Mitch McConnell off, and so grandly! Proud of your stand against amnesty. Proud of your stand against the education boondoggle Common Core. Proud of your stand against bad trade deals. Proud of you being an outsider. Proud of what you'd made of yourself. Proud of your beautiful wife and daughters. Proud of your morals and your Christian life.
You were quite a guy and you were my candidate. I had such confidence in you. You and me, Ted. We were going to Reignite the Dream! We were going to take America back!
WHERE REALITY SHATTERED ILLUSION
The first thing I heard, and verified, was your wife, Heidi, being involved as an executive with Goldman Sachs. Well, so maybe not all Goldman Sachs execs are “bad globalists”? I mean, she's so pretty and she looks so nice on your arm.
Next I heard of her five year stint with the Council on Foreign Relations. It was here, at the CFR, where she conjoined with 30 others to draft the dreadful North American Union (Building a North American Community), intended to join Canada, Mexico, and the United States in a blissful EU-like union. The five year work was released in 2005. Do you understand, Ted, that the NAU wrecks US sovereignty? You're a constitutional lawyer. Didn't you tell her?
Ted the Outsider? First, you are an elected senator from Texas. There are only ONE HUNDRED SENATORS in the entire country, Ted. It's a very exclusive “Insiders” group. I mean, 100 people out of 330,000,000?
Where did you and Heidi meet, Ted? Wasn't it in the 2000 “Elect Bush (43)” campaign? Weren't all Bush's advisers “Insiders”, Ted? Including you? And maybe even that new Harvard grad, Heidi?
You worked inside that Bush (43) administration. First you were a legal policy adviser in the campaign. Then you spent 6 months as an associate Deputy Attorney General at the DOJ. Then you served from July 2001 to January 2003 in the Federal Trade Commission as Director of the Office of Policy Planning.
Were you one of the select attorneys who advised Bush on how to amass more and more power to the Executive Branch? Bush did that, you know. [Here] and [Here]. He had a notorious and rapacious thirst for power and set just a fine table for Obama. Did you help him, Ted? Insiders did.
Your career was stalling in DC, Ted, so you moved back to Texas. Then-Attorney General Greg Abbott (now governor) appointed you Texas Solicitor General and you served Texas well from 2003 to 2008. Still claim you're an Outsider, Ted?
Not really noted anywhere in your campaign biography is what you were doing from 2008 to 2012 before you launched your successful bid to become the junior senator from Texas. In those years you were a private litigator and a partner in the Houston, Texas office of Philadelphia's law firm Morgan Lewis and Bockius. The clients were often very large corporations.
Litigating for this private company you defended very large punitive settlements (in the range of $50,000,000) that ultimately “settled” without ever going to court. But in Texas – and in your campaign to become senator - you defended the 2003 Texas business-friendly tort reform that capped damages at $750,000. That's only 1/66 of the settlements you vigorously defended at Morgan, Lewis and Bockius. How do you square that, Ted?
And the ABA Journal says this about that Texas $750,000 figure: “In cases with multiple defendants, the cap is set at $250,000 for non economic damages against all physicians, and $250,000 against one hospital or $500,000 against two or more hospitals for a total of $750,000. But plaintiffs lawyers say that is so unlikely as to be unrealistic, and the $250,000 cap is their reality.”
In 2011 in private practice, you made $1,570,000 (less in 2012 because you were campaigning). Quite a switch from your current senatorial paycheck. (Isn't that around $174,000 for a whole year, Ted? And Heidi's on unpaid leave?)
Outsider or Insider? Which is your wife, Heidi? In 1995 she received her Master of European Business degree from Solvay Business School in Brussels, Belgium, site of several notable EU organizations. Interesting it was a European business degree.
In 2000 she received her MBA from Harvard. So Heidi was Solvay and Harvard and you were Princeton and Harvard. That sure looks a lot like Ivy League top tier Insiders.
In 2000, Heidi Nelson worked as an economic policy director on the Bush campaign, where she met you, also a Bush campaign adviser. Following her marriage to you in May 2001, she went on to work for the Bush Administration. She began as a top deputy to Bush's U.S. Trade Representive Robert Zoellick, well known for his ties to the World Bank, GATT, and Goldman Sachs. Her focus was economic policy. She also worked as director of the Latin America desk at the Department of Treasury in 2002.
In 2003, Heidi Cruz reported directly to National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. Heidi became Director for the Western Hemisphere on the National Security Council where she served under Rice.
About a year after you opted for Austin Texas, Heidi left her very successful position in DC and took a job with Merrill Lynch in Houston, returning to her investment background, but still 160 miles away from you in Austin.
In 2005, Goldman Sachs hired her away from Merrill Lynch and in 2012, just after you won the senator race in Texas, Goldman Sachs named Heidi (along with some 260 others globally) as a managing director, beginning January 2013. She has since taken an unpaid leave from Goldman Sachs to promote your candidacy.
In no way can this beautiful, talented, and accomplished woman be called an Outsider, Ted.
Citizenship: Another big issue, Ted, no matter that you dismiss it, is your citizenship -- or lack thereof. You claim to be an “Originalist” as regards the Constitution, that it should be interpreted as meant when written back then (like the late Justice Scalia whom you praise).
Laurence Tribe, who taught you at Harvard Law School, has come out against your eligibility because at the time of the writing of the Constitution he states that “natural born” meant physically born in this country and required your father to be a citizen of this country. (Mom didn't count until the mid-1800s.)
And in 2014 you officially renounced your Canadian citizenship... As Canada did not have dual citizenship when you were born in 1970, and you emigrated to the US at age 4, three years before Canada had dual citizenship, what citizenship does that leave you with, Ted?
And by the way, how did a Cuban Canadian get to be a US Senator in Texas? I know Texans can pack a lot under a Stetson, Ted, but that pushes the envelope, even for you.
Amnesty – Here's another yes-and-no issue for you. In 2013 you backed legalization of the illegal immigrants already here. It wasn't until Trump came blazing onto the scene last June that the border wall and deportation became okay with you.
Common Core – Ted? It's rotten to the Core, creates nationalized standards that will drop us even farther than our current 28th place globally in education. YIKES! I just found another U.S. ranking from 2013 that puts us at an unbelievable 36th place globally! Please note on this link that our Education Czar says it's not that our kids aren't keeping up with the pace. It's that the kids in other countries are gaining educational ground faster.... Huh?
You say you oppose Common Core, Ted, and will dismantle it should you become president. However, Anita Hoge has caught you out. She has exposed S. 306 which you are backing. This would effectively put Common Core in every school in the country. Read here. And here. Does nothing shame you, Ted? These are our kids!
(I wonder if you just thought you were too clever, Ted, or was it that you thought that we were just too stupid to notice? You know, Trump people, under educated...)
And Trade Deals, Ted... You were graduating from Princeton, headed to Harvard when (R) Bush 41 heavily backed NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), lost the '92 election, and then (D) Clinton completed the push for NAFTA. Very One World.
Of course it is unlikely that Ivy League schools featured the anti-NAFTA crowd: Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, Pat Choate or the Giant Sucking Sound of our jobs leaving the country. Globalists laughed at and derided snottily all of us who saw clearly the disaster on the horizon. I guess you were too busy studying to notice. If nothing else, the U.S. Sovereignty issues should have interested an up and coming Constitutional law student. How's your memory on that, Ted?
But even with NAFTA as an historical black beacon, you favored the similar TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) trade deal. And even worse – especially for a Constitutional scholar – was/is the TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) which “fast tracks” the TPP.
Surely you must realize that fast tracking takes away the Constitutionally mandated congressional oversight and authority on such deals? How could you be good with that, Ted? -- No congressional participation in the negotiations; no congressional in-depth review of the articles of agreement; no congressional alterations or modifications of the agreement?
And no senate vote on what is a trade treaty? Is that all right with Senator Ted Cruz?
I also saw you as moral and abidingly Christian, more illusions shattered amidst your convenient lies, your overreaching Christian Dominionist Theocratic Old Testament One World views, your willingness to do whatever it takes to further your own ends.
You know, Ted, back in the day I thought your goals were my goals, I thought your vision was my vision, that your dream was my dream. Even last June when I knew I'd vote Trump I held out for you as VP – maybe 8 years of Trump and 8 years of Cruz... Almost a dream ticket... Back then.
Now I'd be appalled if Trump chose you for VP. And I'm fairly sure I don't want a closeted religious zealot, a Christian One Worlder, sitting on the Supreme Court either, no matter how talented he is in the two-faced Debate Master arena.
You've turned too many corners, Ted. God of course can take you back. But I think too many of us out here caught on to your games, your flip flops – see a list of 11 of them in Kelleigh Nelson's article -- your lies conveniently cloaked in schmoozing Sincerity, charismatic Christianity, and patronizing Patriotism.
It is sad to say “Good-Bye”, Ted. But Good-Bye it is. God be with you. And may God be gentle with your wife and kids. And do remember, Ted, what you said about party unity... back in 2012.
God Bless America and Donald Trump.

Saturday, May 21, 2016

BERNIE SANDERS' SUPPORTERS BEWARE: SURVIVOR OF MAO'S "CULTURAL REVOLUTION" IN CHINA SPEAKS OUT, RUNS FOR SENATE IN COLORADO

“I was a slave before. I will never be one again”
LILY TANG WILLIAMS,
COLORADO LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE
FOR SENATE

BeBecause I hate to see the country I love becoming 

more like the country I left


Talk at Colorado University, Boulder, Colorado:
"My Journey for Freedom"-From Mao's Young Pioneer to Libertarian

Survivor of Mao's Revolution Speaks Out!
Published on May 21, 2016
This week marked the 50th anniversary of China's Cultural Revolution. It was a chaotic period of purging and punishment that began on May 16, 1966, and lasted until Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong’s death 10 years later.

Led in large part by Mao's Red Guards, a paramilitary social movement of up to 10 million young people who tortured and killed society`s leaders. Many informed on their own parents` alleged ``counter-revolutionary`` thoughts and actions, even if they didn`t know what those terms meant.

sounds familiar…

Lily tang Williams is a Libertarian candidate running for Senate and a survivor of the cultural revolution. She is speaking out because she hates to see the country she loves becoming more like the country she left

"I once was a slave before and I will never be one again." -Lily Tang Williams

FOLLOW Lily and VOTE!! Facebook page: Lily4Liberty https://www.facebook.com/Lily4Liberty...
http://www.lily4liberty.com/


Victim of Mao: America Becoming Like
Communist China
Published on May 20, 2016
“I was a slave before. I will never be one again”, says Lily Tang Williams, candidate for US Senate in Colorado. Lily talks about life under Mao’s Cultural Revolution and the key tool of cultural revolution in America today — the Federal Dept. of Education.

AMERICA'S "COMMON CORE" 
PUBLIC SCHOOL CURRICULUM, 
JUST LIKE COMUNIST CHINA'S



SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST ABOUT LILY TANG WILLIAMS: