Translate

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

NATIONWIDE PROTEST SEEKS TO ABOLISH PLANNED PARENTHOOD

NATIONWIDE PROTEST SEEKS TO ABOLISH PLANNED PARENTHOOD 
BY LISA SHAW
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/23040-nationwide-protest-seeks-to-abolish-planned-parenthoodrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Justice was being called for, as thousands of Americans across the nation joined together to protest the scandalous actions of Planned Parenthood.
On the morning of April 23, citizens rallied outside of more than 300 Planned Parenthood facilities nationwide, not just to challenge the horrific acts of the nation’s leading abortion provider, but to demand a suspension of government funding for the organization. According to Planned Parenthood’s 2013-2014 Annual Report, an outrageous $528.4 million of their revenue came from taxpayer funding.
#ProtestPP, the coalition that organized the event, was created in response to the videos released last year by the Center for Medical Progress revealing the abortion giant’s heinous practice of trafficking aborted baby parts. The coalition is made up of state and national pro-life groups, headed by three national pro-life activist organizations: Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Created Equal, and the Pro-Life Action League. #ProtestPP also calls to light the injustice of the charges against David Daleiden, the undercover journalist who courageously infiltrated Planned Parenthood and showed America the underbelly of this massive beast. Daleiden should be applauded, at the least, for his fortitude and diligence as he sat through conversation after conversation enduring the grisly boastings of the organization’s bloodthirsty leaders, in order to present the truth to a duped society. However, in a twisted turn of events, we find him the criminal, as the truth gets distorted and the facts get manipulated by those with hidden agendas.
Because distortion and manipulation of this type has found its way into the minds and actions of our society at large, it becomes necessary for those who know the truth to share it with others. At the rallies throughout America on Saturday, the speakers with #ProtestPP did just that.
In Richmond, Virginia, Leslie Blackwell – Virginia regional co-coordinator of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign — was the #ProtestPP organizer. A former radical feminist, and having had two abortions of her own, Blackwell was, at one time, very supportive of what has become known as a “woman’s choice.” In fact, she was a month away from becoming a board member of the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood when she experienced a major heart change. Blackwell now uses her time and talent to defend life and bring awareness to the pain of abortion.
The protest in Richmond took place outside the Planned Parenthood clinic on Hamilton Street, where more than 2,000 unborn babies were murdered in 2014. It is also where Governor Terry McAuliffe recently vetoed the bill to defund Planned Parenthood in Virginia.
"This organization should not be receiving any taxpayer funding for any reason and Governor Terry McAuliffe should be ashamed for his recent ceremonial veto at this very Planned Parenthood location,”stated Blackwell.
The peaceful, but enthusiastic demonstration drew both positive and negative responses as passers-by honked their horns or booed loudly, with nearly 150 supporters lining the 200 block of N. Hamilton Street.
At the demonstration was Fiat Ministries, streaming live, and delegate David LaRock, 33rd House of Representatives District, sharing his pro-life stance and encouraging people to vote pro-life, as well as various other speakers. Within earshot of the workers who would occasionally step outside and the officers from the six police cars stationed in the clinic’s parking lot, these defenders of life boldly shared their stories.
Andie Pearson, Virginia co-coordinator of Silent No More, told of her three abortions and the pain that haunted her for many years after. She spoke of the cold and unfriendly environment she was surrounded by after her first abortion and of the shame and pain of the other young women around her as no one made eye contact, but suffered alone.
Dr. David Russell, author of Through My Father’s Eyes, What Every Man (and Woman) Should Know About Abortion, challenged the idea that abortion is all about a woman’s choice, as he shared his sad experience as a young father who chose abortion for his child and now regrets his decision.
Eliminating the notion that rape is a valid reason for abortion, Richmond Radio and Internet Blogger/Host, Craig Johnson told his history of being conceived in a situation of rape. His mother chose life for him, though, he laments, he later went on to choose to abort his own child conceived out of marriage.
Michael Lewis gave a moving speech discrediting the pro-abortion idea that children with disabilities are of no value and, therefore, more worthy of abortion. Having cerebral palsy owing to a traumatic birth, doctors told Lewis’ parents that he would never walk or talk as he should. Defying the odds, he has gone beyond walking and talking to being a husband, father, and lobbyist, living a fully functional life. Defending the value of life, he adamantly states, “No mere mortal has the right to decide what constitutes a life worth living.”
Offering adoption as an option to abortion, Callie Jett, founder/CEO of Let’s Talk Adoption (open adoption), shared her encouraging story of hope. She described her fears as a pregnant teen 13 years ago, with no place to go and no way to support herself. Finding a pro-life pamphlet, clearly overlooked, in the waiting room of a Planned Parenthood clinic showing the stages of growth of a baby in utero, she decided not to abort. Through a series of events, Jett decided to choose adoption for her son, whom she has been in contact with from the beginning and who was also at the rally on Saturday, along with his adopted mother.
Though very different people, from very different backgrounds, these speakers have a commonality. They each, through their individual experiences, dispel myths that Planned Parenthood and its allies spread to the world. The truth is, abortion is emotionally devastating. Men are affected by abortion. Rape is not a justification for abortion. A child with disabilities has just as much a right to life as a completely healthy one. And, there are alternatives to abortion.
In response to the #ProtestPP rally, Planned Parenthood of Virginia said this:
Planned Parenthood’s top priority is the health and safety of our patients. For the women, men, and young people we serve, the care we provide isn’t about politics – it’s about their well-being. Our dedicated health center staff work to ensure that women and families are able to access affordable, high-quality health care in a safe and caring environment.
These protests are designed to shame the patients who seek basic health care services from Planned Parenthood and to intimidate the health care professionals who work here. The bottom line is that everyone should be able to get health care without fear of violence, harassment, or intimidation.
If we are to believe that this organization’s "top priority" is the health and safety of its patients, then we are to suspend logic and reason. As Pearson recalled in her speech, each patient was laid on a hospital type gurney in a cold room where no one even came to check on the patients. There are no follow up appointments at a Planned Parenthood clinic, therefore any complications from botched abortions are not reported. These women that Planned Parenthood claims are so important are sent to another doctor or, more often, the emergency room to be treated after receiving “high-quality health care.”
While their claim that “everyone should be able to get healthcare without fear of violence, harassment, or intimidation,” rings true enough, further examination of this organization’s practices would reveal a bit of hypocrisy. Life News reports:
According to the president of Planned Parenthood’s Medical Directors’ Council, abortionist Mary Gatter, “maybe 60% to 70%, but a large percent of patients we approached would say yes” to having their aborted babies’ body parts harvested.
Gatter admits to asking patients to harvest their baby’s body parts.
Mental gymnastics are not required to realize that having a salesperson on hand to pounce on an already emotionally distraught young woman to ask her whether or not she would like to sell her dead baby's body parts would cross into the realm of harassment and probably be a little intimidating. Nor are those same gymnastics required to recognize the real motivation for this industry’s actions. Planned Parenthood has built an empire with blood money on the backs of the innocent unborn, and more and more people are being motivated to action.
After two national days of protest held by #ProtestPP in 2015, over 20 Planned Parenthood facilities closed and nine states voted to defund the organization. This year’s protest was the first annual event organized, and is to be held on the fourth Saturday of April every year until Planned Parenthood “no longer preys upon our communities,” according to the coalition’s website.
May our voices be heard and our actions make a difference, as we seek to defend the defenseless.
________________________________________________________

Steven N.H. Wood, Esq.: #ProtestPP on April 23, 2016


THE BASICS OF ISLAM #3: ROBERT SPENCER ON "WASN'T MUHAMMAD PEACEFUL?"

THE BASICS OF ISLAM #3: 
ROBERT SPENCER ON 
"WASN'T MUHAMMAD PEACEFUL?" 
CLEARLY NOT!

RACE DIVIDER MICHELLE OBAMA ATTACKS MISSISSIPPI RELIGIOUS FREEDOM BILL~GOES INTO RANT ABOUT WHITE RACISM, BLACK, LGBT & ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT STRUGGLES

RACIAL DIVIDER
MICHELLE OBAMA 
ATTACKS MISSISSIPPI 
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM BILL,
DRAGS UP 1960s RACE RIOTS IN REVISIONIST HISTORY RANT

THE ATTACK, WHILE SUPPORTING LGBT & ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
                                 

FULL SPEECH ATTACKS WHITE HERITAGE & CULTURE COUCHED IN A BLACK COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS
                                 

Michelle Obama Criticizes Mississippi Religious Freedom Bill During Commencement Speech

BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

JACKSON, Miss. — Michelle Obama criticized Mississippi’s newly-signed religious freedom bill on Saturday during her commencement speech at Jackson State University, painting it to be antithetical to the civil rights movement and societal “progress.”
“We see it right here in Mississippi—just two weeks ago—how swiftly progress can hurtle backward,” she told students during her speech. “How easy it is to single out a small group and marginalize them because of who they are or who they love.”
As previously reported, last month, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed into law the Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, which prohibits the government from punishing those who pass up forms of participation in marital events for religious reasons.
“The state government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person wholly or partially on the basis that the person has provided or declined to provide … services, accommodations, facilities, goods, or privileges for a purpose related to the solemnization, formation, celebration, or recognition of any marriage, based upon or in a manner consistent with a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction,” it reads in part.
The bill only pertains to events and does not permit the refusal of service in general. It also requires restroom use to correlate with birth gender.
“If we fail to exercise our fundamental right to vote, then I guarantee that so much of the progress we’ve fought for will be under threat,” Obama remarked on Saturday. “Congress will still be gridlocked. Statehouses will continue to roll back voting rights and write discrimination into the law.”
Amid citing that the Mississippi Veterans Memorial Stadium used to only be used by whites at one time and that “what was essentially a pro-Jim Crow rally” was once held at the location as well, she lumped same-sex and gender identity issues into the African American civil rights movement.
“So we’ve got to stand side by side with all our neighbors—straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender; Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu immigrant, Native American—because the march for civil rights isn’t just about African Americans, it’s about all Americans,” Obama said.
“It’s about making things more just, more equal, more free for all our kids and grand kids,” she stated. “That’s the story you all have the opportunity to write. That’s what this historic university has prepared you to do.”
Bryant had defended his signing of the law by noting that it “merely reinforces the rights which currently exist to exercise of religious freedom as stated in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.”
“Mississippians from all walks of life believe that the government shouldn’t punish someone because of their views on marriage,” also stated Alliance Defending Freedom legal counsel Kellie Fiedorek. “After all, you’re not free if your beliefs are confined to your mind. What makes America unique is our freedom to peacefully live out those beliefs, and the Constitution protects that freedom.”
An estimated 35,000 people flocked to hear Obama speak at the university, including approximately 800 graduates.

BOYCOTT TARGET: OVER 671,000 SIGN AFA PETITION AGAINST TRANSGENDER BATHROOM POLICY~TARGET REFUSES TO BACK DOWN

DANGER TO WIVES & DAUGHTERS
SIGN PLEDGE TO BOYCOTT:
"Target's policy is exactly how sexual predators get access to their victims"
BATHROOM BACKLASH: OVER HALF A MILLION SIGN PETITION TO BOYCOTT TARGET

“Target's policy is exactly how sexual predators get access to their victims," petition states

BY ADAN SALAZAR
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/bathroom-backlash-over-half-a-million-sign-petition-to-boycott-target/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A petition calling for a boycott on Target over the store’s new bathroom policy promoting “gender inclusivity” has reached over half a million signatures.
Featured at the American Family Association website, the petition contends Target’s new policy “means a man can simply say he ‘feels like a woman today’ and enter the women’s restroom…even if young girls or women are already in there.”
Furthermore, the petition asserts, “Target’s policy is exactly how sexual predators get access to their victims.”
The new bathroom policy also disproportionately endangers female bathroom users, according to the petition.
“Clearly, Target’s dangerous new policy poses a danger to wives and daughters. We think many customers will agree. And we think the average Target customer is willing to pledge to boycott Target stores until it makes protecting women and children a priority.”
Last week, Target announced via its corporate website it would be changing its bathroom policy to “welcome transgender team members and guests to use the restroom or fitting room facility that corresponds with their gender identity,” in the name of inclusivity.
Backlash immediately ensued with several parents taking to social media to vent their protest.
“Basically Target just told us – and millions of concerned parents – that we’re no longer accepted, respected, and welcome in their stores,” wrote dad Izzy Avraham last week in a viral Facebook post. “My friends, Target has crossed a line, and I believe this is a test case.”
Others vented on Twitter under the hashtag #BoycottTarget:
As a solution, the petition’s author suggests, “Target should keep separate facilities for men and women, but for the trans community and for those who simply like using the bathroom alone, a single occupancy unisex option should be provided.”
_______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

600k+ sign petition boycotting Target after statement about transgender bathroom policy


TARGET REFUSES TO BACK DOWN
                                 

Target’s Pro-Transgender Bathroom Policy Is Dangerous to Women and Children
Published on Apr 23, 2016
As the boycott of Target stores over its pro-transgender bathroom policy grows, the question of just who such a policy puts in danger is a natural one to ask. As these policies proliferate across the country, the number of stories of predators threatening women and children in public restrooms is also growing by the day.

The Target department store chain drew the ire of millions of Americans after it announced it was opening its bathrooms to transgender shoppers and employees and allowing them to choose whatever bathroom they feel like using at any given time.

Days later a #BoycottTarget petition effort launched that drew over 200,000 signatures in a day and over 300,000 by the weekend.

The current imbroglio should not be a surprise, as for years Target has been a big purveyor and supporter of gay-friendly policies and causes. So, this current bathroom policy issue is not the first time the chain waded into left-wing issues.

On its corporate website, for instance, there are many posts and announcements celebrating the LGBT lifestyle.

Furthermore, last year, Target was a corporate sponsor of the “Out & Equal” conference, a summit aimed at forcing corporations into adopting gay-friendly workplace policies.

The company was also praised by gay groups for its “It Gets Better” campaign meant to boost the status of homosexuality in the U.S.


ALEX JONES TRANSGENDER BATHROOMS RANT
Published on Apr 25, 2016
The Target department store chain has jumped into the transgender bathroom debate by declaring that men who claim to be women may use whatever bathroom or changing room they choose. http://www.infowars.com/target-stores...
http://www.infowars.com/is-the-britis...
http://www.infowars.com/youtuber-walk...
http://www.infowars.com/what-pisses-m...


Duke Pesta: Target Panders To Politics,
Not Customers






Sunday, April 24, 2016

PLANNED PARENTHOOD PRESIDENT COMPARES ABORTION ADVOCACY TO FIGHT AGAINST RACISM DURING SPEECH AT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY

CECILE RICHARDS, PRESIDENT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD SPEWS HER UNGODLY OPINIONS UNCHALLENGED BY CATHOLIC AUDIENCE
Richard s Credit David Shankbone-compressed
Photo Credit: David Shankbone
PLANNED PARENTHOOD PRESIDENT COMPARES ABORTION ADVOCACY TO FIGHT AGAINST RACISM DURING SPEECH 
AT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY 
BY HEATHER CLARK

WASHINGTON — The president of Planned Parenthood compared abortion advocacy to the fight against racism during her speech on Wednesday at the nation’s oldest Catholic university, during which she obtained a standing ovation.
Cecile Richards, the daughter of former Texas Gov. Ann Richards, had been invited by the student-run Georgetown Lecture Fund, a move that some sharply criticized.
Roman Catholic Cardinal Donald Wuerl told reporters that it was outside of Catholic tradition to give a platform to an individual who promotes abortion.
“This is the latest in a long history of scandal at Georgetown University,” Cardinal Newman Society President Patrick Reilly also stated. “Disguised as an academic event, this is nothing more than a platform for abortion advocacy at a Catholic university.”
“We’re probably the most liberal Catholic university in the nation,” Michael Khan of Georgetown Right to Life told reporters. “Many of our students and faculty aren’t Catholic and are very hostile to Catholic doctrine and Jesuit and Catholic values. We certainly have an active and strong pro-life group on campus, but there’s an equally, perhaps stronger, pro-choice group on campus.”
Khan’s group was among those who stood outside of the event to protest Richards’ appearance. The group Vita Saxa planted thousands of pink and blue flags on the Georgetown lawn to “represent the 3,562 lives lost in the U.S. to abortion each day.”
“They’ve perpetuated this myth that ‘if we go away, so goes women’s health care,’” said Missy Stone of Students for Life of America. “We’re saying no, there are 13,000 federally qualified health centers nationwide and there’s only 700 Planned Parenthood facilities.”
Richards acknowledged that her appearance came with opposition on Wednesday, but compared abortion advocacy to the nation’s fight against racism.
“Based on my Twitter feed, I know there are a lot of folks who didn’t want me to speak today. So thanks for showing up,” she said, according to audio obtained by the Christian Post. “But it is sort of appropriate, in a way, because I think every bit of progress that we have made in this country and we make as a people in the world is because there are people willing to speak out even when it is unpopular.”
Richards spoke of the opposition John Lewis faced in Selma, Alabama in speaking up for the rights of African Americans, and noted the sit-ins that were held in the South to protest racism.
“Our history with race in America is something that we all have to address, including Planned Parenthood,” she said. “It’s important that we understand our collective history and the legacy that it leaves on those that are still living in an unjust system. Lack of access to healthcare and reproductive rights is a result of many factors—race, gender, sexual orientation, geography and immigration status. In order to build true equity in America we have to address it all.”
Richards also praised founder Margaret Sanger, who was known to be a supporter of eugenics and changed the organization’s name from the Birth Control League to Planned Parenthood after some found it to be offensive.
“It is kind of interesting now to see these sepia-toned photos and from day one, there were women lined up down the block pushing baby strollers with babies on their shoulders,” she recalled of Sanger’s clinic in New York City. “Ten days later, an undercover cop who was posing as a mother busted Margaret and threw her in jail.”
While Richards received a standing ovation in the 400-seat Lohrfink Auditorium where she spoke, others were not so pleased with the presentation, nor the question and answer period that followed.
“I don’t think that today’s event represented a free exchange of ideas or a spirit of dialogue,” student Reed Howard told Religion News. “Instead, Cecile Richards was given a platform to spew her beliefs unchallenged.”
________________________________________________________
THE PROTESTORS
Published on Apr 20, 2016
Video by Ford Fischer, for The College Fix

As Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards spoke at Georgetown University on 4/20/16, many in the pro-life movement organized to protest.

One group called the "American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property" chanted anti-abortion slogans and handed out fliers at the entrance to the school. While they invited debate, many were disturbed by their presence. On camera, one student even attempted to burn their flier with her lighter and threw it on the ground when she failed to do so.

Meanwhile, on campus, a Catholic monsignor along with members of Students for Life of America spoke out about abortion outside the building Richards spoke in.

As pro-life students who attended the speech exited, they said Richards did not satisfactorily answer their questions, but rather avoided the issue of abortion as much as possible.

PROFESSOR TEACHES ABORTION AT GEORGETOWN





MIKE PITTS: "SOUTH CAROLINA RESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM REGISTRY LAW" IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL COMMUNIST STYLE INFRINGEMENT ON FREEDOMS OF SPEECH & PRESS

NO, IT'S NOT LIBERAL NEW JERSEY
MIKE PITTS: 
"SOUTH CAROLINA RESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM REGISTRY LAW" 
IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL, COMMUNIST 
STYLE INFRINGEMENT 
ON FREEDOMS OF SPEECH & PRESS

South Carolina lawmakers consider forcing journalists to register with the state

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/south-carolina-lawmakers-consider-forcing-journalists-to-register-with-the-state/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

http://www.liberty.news/2016-04-22-sc-lawmakers-consider-forcing-journalists-to-register-with-the-state-to-eliminate-freedom-of-the-press.html
South Carolina is considered a “red state” – that is, one whose legislature is dominated, supposedly, by small-government conservatives and whose governor, Nikki Haley, was a darling of the Tea Party when she was running for her first term. In fact, one of the most conservative of all U.S. senators, Tim Scott, was appointed by Haley to replace a retiring Republican in 2013.
So what gives with the South Carolina legislature considering a bill that is pro-big government, anti-free speech and smacks of authoritarianism?
As reported by The State, Rep. Mike Pitts, a Republican from Laurens, filed a bill recently in the South Carolina House that would establish a “responsible journalism registry” that would be managed by the S.C. secretary of state.
A summary of the legislation says the measure would “establish requirements for persons before working as a journalist for a media outlet and for media outlets before hiring a journalist.” The summary also says the bill would establish registration fees, set fines for non-compliance and establish criminal penalties for violations.
That’s about as nanny state as it gets: fees, fines and penalties.
The State reported further:
A person seeking to register with the state as a journalist would have to submit a criminal record background check and “an affidavit from the media outlet attesting to the applicant’s journalistic competence.”
The full paragraph of the bill, H. 4102, says, “A person seeking to register shall provide all information required by the office including, but not limited to, a criminal record background check, an affidavit from the media outlet attesting to the applicant’s journalistic competence, and an application fee in an amount determined by the office.”
Thankfully, not everyone in the state is in agreement that the bill is a good idea. You can include Bill Rogers, executive director of the S.C. Press Association (The State is a member of that organization), who said the registry proposal “is ridiculous and totally unconstitutional.”
Governments – state or federal – cannot require journalists to register, said Rogers. He cited the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press as evidence of that.
Pitts told The Post and Courier that while his bill is not a reaction to any particular news story, it is intended instead to stimulate a discussion over how he believes gun issues are being reported.
“It strikes me as ironic that the first question is constitutionality from a press that has no problem demonizing firearms,” Pitts said. “With this statement I’m talking primarily about printed press and TV. The TV stations, the six o’clock news and the printed press has no qualms demonizing gun owners and gun ownership.”
The measure states that persons are “not competent” to be journalists in the state if, within three years of applying for the registry, they have been convicted of “libel, slander, or invasion of privacy; or… a felony if the underlying offense was committed to collect, write, or distribute news or other current information for a media outlet.”
Also, a candidate for registry would be denied if “the person has demonstrated a reckless disregard of the basic codes and canons of professional journalism associations, including a disregard of truth, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness, and public accountability, as applicable to the acquisition of newsworthy information and its subsequent dissemination to the public.”
The assumption is that the secretary of state gets to make the determination, and that such determinations are likely to be arbitrary (“Iwas objective!” “No you weren’t!”).
While there isn’t much chance a law like this passes, even if it does it is highly unlikely it would withstand judicial scrutiny. That said, it’s hard to imagine such a law would even be proposed by a member of a political party that is supposedly opposed, ideologically, to the overarching control of nanny government.
One other point: In this day and age, the Internet has created a massive army of citizen journalists who aren’t necessarily educated as journalists or who don’t practice traditional journalism, but who nevertheless “report” news and events as they happen. A bill like this would kill citizen journalism in South Carolina.
__________________________________________________

Would Require Journalists To Register With Government

MEDIA LICENSE, FEES, PENALTIES?


SEE BILL HERE: 
_______________________________________________________

Representative Michael A. Pitts

Representative Michael A. Pitts
Republican - Laurens
District 14 - Greenwood & Laurens Counties - Map

Columbia Address

327C Blatt Bldg.
Columbia 29201
Business Phone (803) 734-2830

Home Address

372 Bucks Point Rd.
Laurens 29360
Home Phone (864) 923-2925
Send message to Representative Pitts

Personal Information

  • Retired Greenville Police
  • Born in Laurens
  • Son of the late Joseph C., Jr. and the late Lois Lollis Pitts
  • Lander University, B.S., 1985
  • June 28, 1974 married Susan W. Slay, 3 children, Nolan, Clifton, and Della
  • Ex Council of NASC
  • Life member, NRA
  • North American Hunting Club
  • Gun Owners of South Carolina
  • Member, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  • National Wild Turkey Federation
  • ALEC
  • President, National Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses (NASC)
  • Other Funds Oversight
  • Lottery Oversight
  • Agency Heads Salary and Benefits
  • Rabun Creek Baptist Church
  • United States Army Reserve
   

Committee Assignments

Sponsored Bills


  • Primary Sponsor:   
  •  

Voting Record


  •  

Service In Public Office

  • Vice Chairman, Laurens County Council
  • House of Representatives, 2003 - Pres

PRIVY PRIVACY: WHY DO WE EVEN HAVE RESTROOMS?

PRIVY PRIVACY: WHY DO WE 
EVEN HAVE RESTROOMS?
POTTY RE-TRAINING FOR THOSE WHO HAVE FORGOTTEN DECENCY & THE CONSTITUTION
NO KIDDING! WHY THIS NEEDS AN EXPLANATION IN 2016
Published on Apr 23, 2016
Why don’t we just do it in the road? Why do some want to remove privacy in the privy? Why are we worried about national borders but opposed to legal boundaries on government intrusion into private property, privacy & community ideas of decency? Can a judge mandate co-ed bathrooms and showers for boys & girls? Can a state legislature dictate urinals (and men) be added to the ladies’ room? You don’t have a country if you don’t have borders and legal boundaries. You won’t have a country worth having if you destroy the borders and boundaries that define privacy, private property, the difference between men & women, and the family.

You won’t have a country worth having if you 

destroy the borders and boundaries 

that define privacy and decency