Translate

Friday, February 12, 2016

OBAMA RUNNING ILLEGAL INVASION~INFOWARS INTERVIEW WITH BORDER PATROL VICE PRESIDENT

OBAMA RUNNING ILLEGAL INVASION~
INFOWARS INTERVIEW WITH 
BORDER PATROL VICE PRESIDENT 
Published on Feb 10, 2016
David Knight talks with Border Patrol vice president Shawn Moran about how the Border Patrol has been forced to stand down and do nothing while the border implodes.
VIDEO OF DAVID KNIGHT WITH SHAWN MORAN

OBAMA QUOTES KORAN OUT OF CONTEXT TO FALSELY SHOW ISLAM'S "PEACEFULNESS"~FULL TEXT MENTIONS CALIPHATE & BEHEADING

Robert Spencer Video: Obama Quotes Muhammad’s Speech Endorsing the Caliphate and Beheading

BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/robert-spencer-video-obama-quotes-muhammads-speech-endorsing-the-caliphate-and-beheadingrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

NETANYAHU PLANS FENCE AROUND ISRAEL TO PROTECT IT FROM "WILD BEASTS"~A MODEL FOR TRUMP?

4096
NETANYAHU PLANS FENCE AROUND ISRAEL TO PROTECT IT FROM "WILD BEASTS" 
A MODEL FOR TRUMP?
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/netanyahu-plans-fence-around-israel-to-protect-it-from-wild-beasts/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Benjamin Netanyahu has announced his intention to “surround all of Israel with a fence” to protect the country from infiltration by both Palestinians and the citizens of surrounding Arab states, whom he described as “wild beasts”.
The Israeli prime minister unveiled the proposal during a tour of the Jordan border area in Israel’s south, adding that the project – which would cost billions of shekels – would also be aimed at solving the problem of Hamas infiltration tunnels from Gaza, a recent source of renewed concern.
He called the border project a part of a “multi­-year plan to surround Israel with security fences to protect ourselves in the current and projected Middle East”.
Describing the need for new walls and fences on Tuesday, Netanyahu said: “In our neighborhood, we need to protect ourselves from wild beasts.
“At the end of the day as I see it, there will be a fence like this one surrounding Israel in its entirety. We will surround the entire state of Israel with a fence, a barrier.”
Netanyahu said the Israeli government was also examining ways of sealing gaps in the existing separation wall that runs along large areas of the occupied West Bank.
That separation wall – ordered to be built at great cost by former prime minister Ariel Sharon – was originally credited with a drop in the number of violent attacks by Palestinians in Israel, not least suicide bombings, a key feature of the second intifada in the first few years of this century.
That judgment has been undermined by the apparent ease with which Palestinians assailants have managed to enter Israel in the current wave of violence since October.
The war in Gaza in 2014 also demonstrated how easy it was for Hamas to tunnel beneath the barriers surrounding the coastal enclave into Israel itself.
“If you’re thinking of erecting a fence there you have to take into account that they could tunnel underneath it,” Netanyahu said. “The people who said that there is no significance to [retaining] territory in the modern age should go to Gaza.”
The proposal was, however, criticized by one of Netanyahu’s own cabinet ministers, education minister Naftali Bennett of the hard­ right Jewish Home party, who has been embroiled in a series of recent disagreements over security policy with the prime minister.
Commenting on the proposal, Bennett said: “The prime minister spoke today about how fences are needed. We are wrapping ourselves in fences. In Australia and New Jersey there is no need for fences.”
Netanyahu’s use of the phrase “wild beasts” – also translated as “predators” – recalled his use of equally incendiary language about Israeli Arabs on the eve of last year’s elections whom he described as “coming out in droves”.
The prime minister made his comments as he visited a section of approximately 18 miles of fence being built from the Red Sea city of Eilat to near where Israel is constructing a new international airport. That alone is costing $77m (£53m). In 2013, Israel also completed a five­ meter ­high fence along its border with Sinai.



HOMOSEXUAL BARRY MANILOW STARS AT MARCUS POINTE BAPTIST TEMPLE, PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

BARRY MANILOW "MARRIES" GARRY KIEF, LONG TERM MANAGER & "PARTNER"

Barry Manilow (Age 72) shocks fans by marrying secret boyfriend

Barry Manilow and husband
BUT THAT'S NOT THE STORY:
INDEPENDENT BAPTIST CHURCH FEATURES HOMOSEXUAL ENTERTAINER 
MARCUS POINTE BAPTIST TEMPLE
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
  • Pastor: Gordon Godfrey Jr
Barry Manilow
"At Marcus Point, believe in worshiping God in many different ways. Find something that you enjoy and get involved! There's something for everyone! Our purpose is to use the arts as a communication tool for God's glory! It is the purpose of our music and worship ministry to point people to Christ through the creative arts." 
(Friday Church News Notes, February 12, 2016,www.wayoflife.org,fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) - 
    Marcus Pointe Baptist Temple in Pensacola, Florida, illustrates the slippery slope of messing with contemporary music and embracing the accompanying heresy that grace equates with non-judgmentalism in matters such as music. The pastor, Gordon Godfrey, spoke at Southwide Baptist Fellowship in 2006 and 2009. In fact, Marcus Pointe hosted the Southwide Fellowship meeting in 2009. Evangelist Tim Lee reported in his blog that year that the meeting “was awesome” and that Marcus Pointe is one of his supporting churches. This “awesome” church has been on the slippery slope of spiritual compromise for years, and the effect is obvious. 
    This January it hosted entertainer Barry Manilow on his One Last Time Tour. The church’s choir accompanied Manilow in a worldly rock & roll show that included Manilow’s hit song “Copacabana.” The lyrics begin like this: “Her name was Lola, she was a showgirl/ With yellow feathers in her hair and a dress cut down to there/ She would merengue and do the cha-cha/ And while she tried to be a star/ Tony always tended bar/ Across the crowded floor, they worked from 8 til 4/ They were young and they had each other/ Who could ask for more?” When a concerned brother in Christ communicated to one of the Marcus Pointe choir members that Manilow is a homosexual who “married” his long-time partner in 2015, the choir member didn’t know and “didn’t seem to care.” One day, it will be evident to such people that ignorance is not bliss and the true grace of God is not non-judgmental tolerance of sin and error. “For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world” (Titus 2:11-12). “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them” (Ephesians 5:11).
_____________________________________________________

BUT THREE YEARS AGO, HE WARNED PARENTS ABOUT THE GAY LIFESTYLE:

MESSAGE: Where Did 
We Go Wrong?
Published on Feb 19, 2013
From the series "The Adam Family" on Sunday, February 17th at Marcus Pointe 
Baptist Church in Pensacola, FL. Pastor Godfrey has served in full time ministry 
since 1979. He's been the Senior Pastor of Marcus Pointe Baptist for over 20 years. 
He and his wife June have three grown children: Becky Godfrey (Meredith), Greg, 
and Bobby. June and Pastor have five grandchildren. Pastor Godfrey's goal in 
ministry is to connect people to God, to one another, and to a lost world.
Pastor Claims Sam Champion, Lady Gaga 
Are Promoting 'Gay Lifestyle'


A TRUE PAPAL APOLOGY WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS

A TRUE PAPAL APOLOGY 
(Friday Church News Notes, February 12, 2016,www.wayoflife.orgfbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) - 
    Since John Paul II, there have been a string of “apologies” about Rome’s past that, upon examination, prove to be empty. The most recent is Pope Francis’ January 25 apology. It was characterized by U.S. News & World Report and many others as a “sweeping apology for Catholic wrongs committed against other Christians,” but it was nothing of the sort. Here is what the Pope said in St. Peter’s Cathedral: “As the bishop of Rome and pastor of the Catholic Church, I would like to invoke mercy and forgiveness for the non-evangelical behavior of Catholics toward Christians of other churches” (“Pope Francis ... makes sweeping apology,” U.S. News & World Report, Jan. 25, 2016). That is the sweeping apology! “Non-evangelical behavior” is a most amazing way to describe the imprisonment, robbery, torture, torment, burning, and crusading slaughter of millions of “Christians of other churches”! This is not an apology. It is arrogance; it is presumption; it is a lie; it is a further affront. John Paul II’s “apologies” were of the same caliber. Consider “Memory and Reconciliation: The Church and the Faults of the Past,” published in December 1999. It was written by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI, and it was approved by Pope John Paul II. The latter stated that the “apology” contained in this document would lead to a “new springtime of Christianity.” This report stated that “doubtful means were employed in the pursuit of good ends” and spoke of “intolerance and even the use of force in the service of truth.” That’s it. That’s the “apology.” 
    A genuine papal apology would go something like this: “I am the head of a false church that was formed from rebellion against God’s Word 1600 years ago and that is actually more akin to the whore of Revelation 17. I renounce my false and blasphemous claim to represent Christ on earth and to be the head of all churches. I renounce as heresies the priesthood, sacramental salvation, infant baptism, Mariolatry, purgatory, saints, relics, monasticism, and every other thing that is contrary to God’s holy Word and the doctrine and practice of the original churches that Christ founded. I accept the holy Scripture as the sole authority for faith and practice according to the teaching of the apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 3:16-17, and I renounce every Catholic tradition contrary to Scripture. I decry all claims of supremacy. I denounce all of the horrible things that the Roman Catholic Church has done to people throughout its history. I renounce all of the moral filth that has been committed by popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, monks, and nuns under the guise of Christianity. I repent of these things in sackcloth and ashes before the whole world. I renounce baptismal regeneration and cast myself wholly upon the blood of Jesus Christ for my salvation. May God have mercy on my soul for my participation of Rome’s false affairs.”

WHY WE ARE ALREADY SLAVES

WHY WE ARE ALREADY SLAVES
by Gavin Seim, Patriot

Thursday, February 11, 2016

STUPID US CATHOLIC BISHOPS LAUNCH NATIONAL CATHOLIC-MUSLIM DIALOGUE, SUCH AS WITH HAMAS, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AL-QAEDA

STUPID US CATHOLIC BISHOPS LAUNCH NATIONAL CATHOLIC-MUSLIM DIALOGUE, SUCH AS WITH HAMAS, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AL-QAEDA
BY ROBERT SPENCER

“The current regional Catholic-Muslim dialogues are the Mid-Atlantic (partnering with the Islamic Circle of North America), Midwest (partnering with the Islamic Society of North America) and West Coast (partnering with the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California and the Islamic Educational Center of Orange County). Each is co-chaired by a bishop and a Muslim leader from the corresponding regional organization. These dialogues will continue to meet and will work collaboratively with the members of the new national dialogue.”
The Islamic Circle of North America: “Terrorism analyst Steven Emerson claims that ICNA has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, the ideological forebear of all radical Islamic movements — including Hamas and al-Qaeda. Documents show that Hamas officials have participated in previous ICNA events. ‘The ICNA’s hatred of the Jews is so fierce,’ writes Emerson, ‘that it taunted them with a repetition of what Hitler did to them.’ In his book American Jihad, Emerson expounds: ‘The ICNA openly supports militant Islamic fundamentalist organizations, praises terror attacks, issues incendiary attacks on western values and policies, and supports the imposition of Sharia [Islamic law].’ ICNA was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document — titled ‘An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America‘ — as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 like minded ‘organizations of our friends’ that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These ‘friends’ were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims ‘that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.'”
The Islamic Society of North America: “ISNA leaders view Islam as being superior to all other faiths and destined to replace them. Taha J. Alwani, a leading official of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is run under ISNA, writes: ‘In considering the earth as an arena for Islam, Allah has promised its inheritance to His righteous people, and He has promised that Islam will prevail over other religions.’…In July 2008, ISNA’s lawyers conceded that their organization, through its affiliate NAIT, had given financial support to Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook. Their defense was that documentary evidence of those ties dated back to the late 1980s and early 1990s, before the U.S. government had officially designated Hamas as a terrorist organization.”
What do you think is the goal of such groups in engaging in “dialogue” with Catholic bishops? The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ 2014 statement on “dialogue” quotes the 2007 document sent to the Pope and other Christian leaders, A Common Word Between Us and You. It is likely that not a single one of the bishops was ever curious about where the phrase “a common word between us and you comes from beyond the Qur’an citation provided in that document’s epigraph. If they had looked it up in the Qur’an, they would have found that the full passage is not a call for mutual understanding and mutual respect; rather, it is an exhortation to Christians to convert to Islam: “Say: ‘People of the Book! Come now to a word common between us and you, that we serve none but Allah, and that we associate no others with Him, and do not some of us take others as Lords, apart from Allah.’ And if they turn their backs, say: ‘Bear witness that we are Muslims’” (3:64). Since Muslims consider the Christian confession of the divinity of Christ to be an unacceptable association of a partner with God, this verse is saying that the “common word” that Muslims and the People of the Book should agree on is that Christians should discard one of the central tenets of their faith and essentially become Muslims.
For groups such as ICNA and ISNA, that is almost certainly what the “dialogue” is all about, along with compelling Catholic leaders to remain silent about Muslim persecution of Christians, as when Robert McManus, Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, Massachusetts, suppressed a planned talk at a Catholic conference on that persecution, explaining: “Talk about extreme, militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally might undercut the positive achievements that we Catholics have attained in our inter-religious dialogue with devout Muslims.” Evil works under the cover of darkness, and McManus, drunk on “dialogue,” was happy to supply that cover.
But the typical modern Catholic bishop, coddled, cosseted, regal, arrogant, authoritarian, ignorant, self-infatuated, and utterly devoid of charity, will never deign to acknowledge any of this. They are blind guides.
Blase Cupich
“US Bishops Launch National Catholic-Muslim Dialogue,” Zenit, February 9, 2016:
Archbishop Blase J. Cupich of Chicago will serve as the first Catholic co-chair of a new National Catholic-Muslim Dialogue, sponsored by the Committee on Ecumenical and Inter-religious Affairs of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). Archbishop Cupich’s tenure as dialogue co-chair will begin January 1, 2017.
The bishops’ ecumenical and inter-religious committee has co-sponsored three regional Catholic-Muslim dialogues for over two decades. Bishop Mitchell T. Rozanski of Springfield, Massachusetts, chair of the committee, said the time is right to begin a national dialogue.
“As the national conversation around Islam grows increasingly fraught, coarse and driven by fear and often willful misinformation, the Catholic Church must help to model real dialogue and good will,” said Bishop Rozanski. “Our current dialogues have advanced the goals of greater understanding, mutual esteem and collaboration between Muslims and Catholics, and the members have established lasting ties of friendship and a deep sense of trust. I am grateful to Archbishop Cupich for agreeing to represent our Conference in this crucial conversation.”
How grand: they’ve established lasting ties of friendship and a deep sense of trust. How many Christians have they saved from Muslim persecution? How many churches have they prevented from being destroyed by Islamic jihadis?
The current regional Catholic-Muslim dialogues are the Mid-Atlantic (partnering with the Islamic Circle of North America), Midwest (partnering with the Islamic Society of North America) and West Coast (partnering with the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California and the Islamic Educational Center of Orange County). Each is co-chaired by a bishop and a Muslim leader from the corresponding regional organization. These dialogues will continue to meet and will work collaboratively with the members of the new national dialogue….

SAN DIEGO ATTEMPTS TO BAN TERM ‘FOUNDING FATHERS’ DUE TO ‘GENDER BIAS’

SAN DIEGO ATTEMPTS TO BAN TERM ‘FOUNDING FATHERS’ DUE TO ‘GENDER BIAS’
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/san-diego-attempts-to-ban-term-founding-fathers-due-to-gender-bias/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A memo intended for San Diego city employees attempted to bar them from saying the words “Founding Fathers” because of the “gender bias” the term allegedly implies.
Entitled, “Visual and Correspondence Style Guidelines,” the memo sought to implement speech restrictions banning employees from uttering everyday terms like “man made” and “mankind” on the basis that such terms exhibit “non-inclusive language.”
“Most alarmingly,” reads a press release from the Pacific Justice Institute, “is the guidelines directive, on page 76, that City employees should refrain from mentioning those to whom owe our most fundamental freedoms, the Founding Fathers.”
The legal organization has offered free help for any city employee that is reprimanded for referring to Thomas Jefferson, George Washington or any of the men that shaped the nation’s history.
“The manual’s inane attempt to recast the fathers as simply the ‘Founders’ reaches a level of political correctness, censorship and insensitivity towards time-honored American values that is indefensible,” the press release reads.
Evidently San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer was unaware of the manual’s “gender inclusive” efforts until recently.
In a tweet sent today, he stated he had already ordered the manual removed from city use, citing it as an example of how political correctness has gone wild.
“Suggesting that our Founding Fathers should be referred to as ‘Founders’ is political correctness run-amuck. We are proud of our nation’s history and there is nothing wrong with referring to the Founding Fathers,” Faulconer said.
“At my direction this was removed yesterday from the City’s correspondence manual. The manual will be reviewed for other misguided examples that defy common sense and changes will be made accordingly.”
Indeed, the case is illustrative of how political correctness can grow so out of proportion that it begins to directly infringe on civil liberties.
Cities such as Seattle have similarly moved to ban words like “citizen” and “brown bag” on the basis that such words are offensive. In Ontario, Canada, France and other places, the words “mother” and “father” have even been removed from government forms in the name of inclusiveness.
_____________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:


ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMISTS CALL FOR SHOOTING RANCHERS' CATTLE

Enviro Extremists Call for Shooting Ranchers’ Cattle
ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMISTS CALL FOR SHOOTING RANCHERS' CATTLE
BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/22515-enviro-extremists-call-for-shooting-ranchers-cattlerepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Intentionally shooting someone else’s livestock is a crime — a felony. Doing it to make a political statement and intimidate the owners might be considered terrorism. That’s what a Facebook page for the “Public Lands Hunt Club” is advocating, and that is causing concern and anger among ranchers and farmers in the western states. Is the Facebook page merely a spoof, as some observers claim, or is it agitprop aimed at fomenting the criminal acts it glibly professes to support?
The website logo features a photo (shown) of a Black Angus cow facing the camera, with the cross hairs of a rifle scope, in red, planted directly on the cow’s head. The site also features many photos of dead cattle that the Public Lands Hunt Club (PLHC) claims — or implies — are the result of their handiwork.
The PLHC has posted these club “rules”:
Cattle that are legally grazing on our public lands are to be left alone. PLHC members are to only target cattle owned by ranchers who have publicly renounced their grazing contracts designed to provide a minimum of environmental protections. Many of these ranchers are publicly known due to their actions and associations with the Bundy Family of Nevada. Furthermore, all cattle found in areas near or surrounding militia occupied lands are fair game. Ranchers abiding by their contracts and showing good land stewardship practices are off limits to PLHC member activities.
Shoot straight. Be safe. Have fun. ©2016 PLHC
The photos of dead cattle shown on the PLHC may simply be Photo-shopped pictures taken off the Internet or agriculture magazines. The Capital Press, an agriculture news website, reported that the Oregon State Police have “no information of any cows illegally killed” or anything related to the PLHC FB page, according to an e-mail response from OSP spokesman Lt. Bill Fugate. According to the same Capital Press report, the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association is monitoring the page, but did not report any incidents. The New American was unable to document any specific cattle-killing incidents linked to the photos or claims of the PLHC.
Multiple posters on the PLHC webpage have expressed their outrage over the group’s support for criminal activity, but the PLHC’s typical response is to accuse them of being “welfare ranchers” and to tell them to “stop whining.”
“Welfare ranchers” has become a common meme among environmental militants, as has referring to cattle as an “invasive species.”
The PLHC Facebook timeline for January 29, 2016 says: “Official cattle count is now 16. Shoot straight. Be safe. Have fun.” Directly below that posting is one from a rancher (presumably) listed as “Wes Clegg,”who irately states: “You think this is funny they have been shooting my cows and horses and when I catch you guys there will be no law you’ll be six feet under you people don’t get it."
PLHC responds to Clegg: “If you are complying with your grazing permits you have nothing to fear so stop your whining.” By February 1 the PLHC claimed that its cattle body count was up to 23.
Anti-Mormon, anti-beef, anti-rancher, pro-vegan, pro-wolf
It might appear from the PLHC “rules” and some of the comments listed above that the PLHC opposes only those ranchers who graze cattle on the so-called “public lands,” but who refuse to “cooperate” with the federal agencies that manage those lands. However, the PLHC’s Facebook URL link would seem to advocate actually shooting not only the cattle of “welfare ranchers,” but ranchers themselves.
It is also apparent from numerous postings in the PLHC Facebook page, as well as the many extremist environmental groups and websites they link to, that PLHC views all ranching — whether on public or private lands — as pernicious and detrimental to Mother Earth. PETA, Sierra Club, Earth First!, Wild Earth Guardians, One Green Planet, and Natural Resources Defense Council are but a few of the far-left enviro groups that post to PLHC (and/or that PLHC frequently links to). Photos and quotations of the late Edward Abbey, the patron saint of radical “deep ecology,” “ecotage,” and “monkey wrenching” (enviro terrorism and sabotage), are liberally sprinkled throughout the PLHC FB page, including quotes denouncing ranchers, ranching, and cattle. Cattle ranching is repeatedly cited as being inimical to wolves and other "threatened" and "endangered" flora and fauna.
The Arizona Daily Independent reported that the PLHC’s vitriol “is especially harsh for those of the Mormon faith,” pointing specifically to a comment by a PLHC administrator to a posting by a critic: “Barbara would you please try again in English? We don’t speak inbred Mormon retard here.” The site is littered with many other anti-Mormon and anti-Christian comments.
How has Facebook reacted to the PLHC’s incivility, bigotry, and advocacy of criminal intolerance toward ranchers and their livestock? According to the Daily Independent, Facebook has responded to complaints and requests to take down the PLHC page with the following comment:
Thank you for taking time to report something that you feel may violate our Community Standards. Reports like yours are an important part of making Facebook a safe and welcoming environment. We reviewed the Page you reported for harassment and found it doesn’t violate our Community Standards. Thanks, The Facebook Team.
Related articles:


FREE SPEECH: THE RIGHT TO TELL THE GOVERNMENT TO GO TO HELL

FREE SPEECH: THE RIGHT TO TELL THE GOVERNMENT TO GO TO HELL 
BY ATTORNEY JOHN WHITEHEAD
FROM: http://www.rutherford.org/multimedia/on_target/the_right_to_tell_the_government_to_go_to_hellrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Uploaded on Feb 9, 2016
Free speech is no longer free. Emboldened by phrases such as “hate crimes,” “bullying,” “extremism” and “micro-aggressions,” the government is whittling away at free speech, confining it to carefully constructed “free speech zones,” criminalizing it when it skates too close to challenging the status quo, shaming it when it butts up against politically correct ideals, and muzzling it when it appears dangerous. In this episode of On Target, John W. Whitehead identifies the kinds of speech being targeted for censorship or outright elimination.