Translate

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

LIBERTY BAPTIST DELAWARE: THUMBS DOWN ON "MOMS' NIGHT OUT" (COMEDY) DINNER SHOW OUTREACH~SECULAR WORLD FOUND THIS MOVIE OFFENSIVE; HOW COME CHRISTIANS THINK IT'S GREAT?





"DRIVEN ON PURPOSE"

LOW RATED TRASH ENTERTAINMENT
AT YOUR LOCAL EMERGING CHURCH
(BUT CHRISTIANS DON'T KNOW IT'S TRASH)
OFFENSIVE GOSPEL NOT HERE ON PURPOSE

LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, BEAR, DELAWARE IS NOT ABOUT TO GIVE UP ON ITS WARREN/HYBELS SEEKER SENSITIVE GIMMICKS TO ATTRACT THE UNREGENERATE,
THEN BIND THEIR CONSCIENCES
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:



NOW AN UNDER THE RADAR DINNER & MOVIE "OUTREACH" TO CELEBRATE THE END OF THE 21 DAY "DANIEL FAST", WITH ALL THE USUAL UNHEALTHY "CHRISTIAN" FOOD: (ONLY MEMBERS ARE TO KNOW IT'S AN OUTREACH, TO PROTECT THE UNSUSPECTING):

SO WHAT'S THE PROBLEM, YOU ASK?
WELL, THE DINNER FOLLOWS ON THE HEELS OF THE WORKS BASED 21 DAY "DANIEL FAST", 
CATHOLIC STYLE SELF DENIAL FOR INDULGENCES:
"In fasting we worship God through sacrifice, demonstrating that we love Him more than His gifts." (http://libertybaptist.net/thedanielfast/).

This is blatantly unbiblical and disobedient to the Lord:
Matthew 9:13-"Go and learn what this means, ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.’ For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.”
Hosea 6:6-"For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.

MORE TROUBLING IS THE MOVIE CHOSEN FOR 

THIS CHURCH MINISTRY MARKETING EVENT:

"MOMS' NIGHT OUT"

STARRING THOSE WHO NEVER WERE AND STILL AREN'T 
BORN AGAIN CHRISTIANS AS ROLE MODELS
STARRING PATRICIA HEATON, COMEDIAN?

Moms' Night Out: Patricia Heaton Official Interview:

FROM: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/31/theater/31gree.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
"In college, and especially during eight subsequent years of hapless struggle in New York, that distance became a kind of no-man’s-land she had to traverse daily, from bad job to binge to church and back again. The churches varied: Catholic, Calvinist, New Age cult."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Heaton;
QUOTES:
Patricia Heaton was born in Bay Village, Ohio, the daughter of Patricia (née Hurd) and Chuck Heaton, who was a sportswriter for the Plain Dealer. She was raised as a devout Roman Catholic.
Heaton's feature films include  The New Age (1994), "In order to find meaning to their empty lives, they follow various New Age gurus." (SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Age_(film)
Heaton has been married to British actor David Hunt since 1990; it is her second marriage. Her first marriage (1984–1987) ended in divorce. 
Although she and her family attend a Presbyterian Church, Heaton says she is still a Catholic.
Heaton is a "consistent life ethicist" and is supportive of pro-life groups and causes, opposing abortion, euthanasia, and the death penalty. 
(QUOTE: "The consistent life ethic, or the consistent ethic of life is an ideology that opposes abortion, capital punishment, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. Adherents are opposed, at the very least, to unjust war, while some adherents also profess pacifism, or opposition to all war. The term was coined in 1983 by the Catholic Cardinal Joseph Bernardin to express an ideology based on the premise that all human life is sacred and should be protected by law. Though most prominently professed by people of faith, the consistent life ethic is neither a religious nor a political ideology.")
Heaton openly supports gay rights, and has publicly stated that she is not against same-sex marriage.
_______________________________________________________________
SECULAR FILM REVIEWS ARE MOSTLY NEGATIVE:
QUOTES: 

"A shrill feature-length sitcom for the faith-based family values crowd, if nowhere near as good as that sounds. There’s nothing wrong with “Moms’ Night Out” that couldn’t be fixed by a massive rewrite, preferably one that involves a lobotomy for the main character."

QUOTES: 
"Cheap-looking, unfunny, and kind of sexist to boot, Moms' Night Out is a 

disappointment from start to finish."

"The critics got it right. The movie is awful. Having a popular star like Patricia Heaton in this movie is not enough to save it. The mothers and fathers depicted in this movie are mostly idiots and should never have had children. The script wouldn't have been approved for an ABC afternoon special because it's so poor."

QUOTES: 
"Depressingly regressive and borderline dangerous, "Moms’ Night Out" peddles archaic notions of gender roles in the name of wacky laughs. But it also wants to be "About Something." It wants to inspire as well as entertain. It’s "The Hangover" aimed at Christian audiences, and if that sounds like an impossible prospect, well, that’s because it is.
"Moms’ Night Out" is just as afraid to let loose as its characters are. Then again, the people who populate this picture are more like clichéd, cardboard types: the frazzled, stay-at-home mom; the well-meaning, absent dad; the flighty best friend; the snooty restaurant hostess. Why must faith-based offerings be so lame and—worst of all—so out of touch with reality?
Basically, the moral of the story is: Don’t go out. Because if you do, all hell will break loose—or rather, all heck."

QUOTES:
"Mothers deserve a much better break than the hectic, shrill and dismally unpleasant Moms' Night Out (* out of four; rated PG; opening Friday in select cities). Ads make it look like a wacky outing featuring fun-loving moms and clueless dads. But there's no fun to be had — and not a drop of originality — in this chaotic and contrived mess. Outlandish high jinks are underscored by an inspirational message that seems out of place in this slapstick misfire. The gently religious message might have come across better if the film had been even remotely subtle. What follows is unadulterated idiocy. The story feels cobbled together from other movies. Its view of harried moms and hapless dads is stereotypical and simplistic. So much of the story is clichéd and derivative. An early scene of the moms walking in slow motion a là Reservoir Dogs is ridiculously played out. Worse, the tone is jarring, careening between raucous physical gags and potential tragedy as if they're equal on the zany shenanigans scale."
___________________________________________________
BUT THE APOSTATE "CHRISTIAN" FOCUS ON THE FAMILY 
"PLUGGED IN" WEBSITE HAS A POSITIVE REVIEW:
QUOTES:
"In fact, this pic works so well that I've got a feeling Moms' Night Out will make many a real-world date night or girls' getaway into a chuckle-worthy time … while keeping sweet thoughts of the kids right there at the heart of things."

"PLUGGED IN" HAS MORE RECENTLY BEEN CRITICIZED/CONDEMNED FOR REVIEWING THE PORNOGRAPHIC/SEX ABUSIVE FILM "FIFTY SHADES OF GREY"
http://christiannews.net/2015/02/14/christians-concerned-as-focus-on-the-family-watches-reviews-porn-film-50-shades-of-grey/
“Should Christians visit porn sites so they can examine the content in order to warn others about the dangers of pornography?” wrote evangelist Shane Dodson in a blog post about the matter. “The Scriptures warn us to ‘flee from sexual immorality,’ not run toward it in the name of evangelism. Even the lost knows that this material is trashy, why is it that a supposed mature Christian ministry hasn’t quite figured it out?”
“Plugged In—in their unfortunate choice to bring pornographic films into their scope of film criticism—have committed the error of conflating porn as art. I hope and pray that those in control of such things repent of their blasphemy and of causing brothers and sisters to stumble,” Dodson said. “The Lord Jesus Christ warned of a horrible fate for those who would cause a believer to stumble (Mark 9:42). Focus on the Family should heed that warning, because there is more than just their credibility on the line here.”
___________________________________________________

THESE ARE NOT CHRISTIAN ROLE MODELS 

FOR THE CHURCHED OR UNCHURCHED

A) SARAH DREW: 
FREED FROM THE "PRISON OF PERFECTIONISM"
"ROMPING THROUGH THE BEAUTIFUL MESS WE CALL PARENTHOOD"
VIDEO FROM THE APOSTATE "CHRISTIAN" GUIDEPOSTS YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
THEN:

Sarah Drew From Grey's Anatomy Talks About Hunky Co-Stars:
Published on May 15, 2014
Sarah Drew from "Grey's Anatomy" talks about hunky co-stars she wouldn't mind sharing the sack with.


Her father, Rev. Charles Drew, is the senior pastor at Emmanuel Presbyterian Church in New York City. (PCA "REFORMED")
UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED AND LOVED BY THE WORLD? (HINT: THEN YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN):
"I’ve met Christians everywhere I go, I’ve met Christians on every set I’ve been on, in the crew, the cast, everywhere. I’ve met producers who are Christians and are producing secular shows. So much beauty and truth can be found in every, in every different show that’s there. It might not be appropriate for children, for people of all ages, but I do think that, um, that that truth is a beautiful truth that people want, stories people want to tell. I’ve found it everywhere. I have."
(HINT: THESE ARE THE "CHRISTIANS" IN NAME ONLY, IF EVEN THAT)
___________________________________________________
B) TRACE ADKINS
Adkins then moved on to playing in honky tonk bars around Nashville, Tennessee, in the early 1990s. It was followed by "Honky Tonk Badonkadonk", which became a highly successful crossover hit, bringing Adkins into the Top 40 of the Billboard Hot 100 for the first time.  "Ladies Love Country Boys" became Adkins' second Number One single on the country charts and his first since "(This Ain't) No Thinkin' Thing" in 1997. Trace released his first book, entitled A Personal Stand: Observations and Opinions from a Free-Thinking Roughneck. In April 2011, Adkins revealed that he had a crush on the Baylor Lady Bears' head coach, Kim Mulkey, while the two were in college at Louisiana Tech, then dedicated his performance of "One in a Million You" to her. In February 2012, Adkins appeared as a guest vocalist on Meat Loaf's album Hell in a Handbasket. Adkins has two daughters, Tarah and Sarah, with his ex-wife, and three daughters with current wife. He has also experienced a number of serious injuries as an adult, including being shot by his ex-wife in 1994. In early 2014, Adkins checked into rehab for alcoholism after getting into an altercation on a cruise ship. In March 2014, Trace Adkins and his wife Rhonda filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. According to Rhonda's Twitter account, they are still married.

_______________________________________________________________

C) SEAN ASTIN

FROM WIKIPEDIA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Astin

Astin was born Sean Patrick Duke in Santa Monica, California, the son of actress Patty Duke. At the time, it was reported that entertainer Desi Arnaz, Jr. was his biological father. In 1994 Astin discovered that his biological father is actually Michael Tell, a music promoter and writer, and publisher of the newspaper The Las Vegas Israelite; Tell was married to Patty Duke for 13 days in 1970. Astin experienced a career breakthrough with his role as Samwise Gamgee in Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. Astin is currently the voice of Raphael in the new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles animated series on Nickelodeon. Astin portrays the role of Matthew in The Truth & Life Dramatized audio New Testament Bible, a 22-hour, celebrity-voiced, fully dramatized audio version of the New Testament, which uses the RSV-CE. Astin has a tattoo on his ankle of the word "nine" written with the Tengwar script, commemorating his Lord of the Rings involvement and his character's membership in the Fellowship of the Ring. 

LIBERAL POLITICS:
During the 2004 United States presidential election, Astin backed Senator John Kerry and participated in Kerry's campaign rally in Portland, Oregon, as the opening speaker. In the 2008 presidential election, Astin lent his support to Senator Hillary Clinton and made multiple campaign appearances on her behalf, including joining Clinton's daughter, Chelsea Clinton, at some stops.
Astin is a vegetarian. He attended Catholic school and is a Protestant Christian, attending a Presbyterian church in Bel Air, California, US. Astin studied Nichiren Buddhism, John Astin's faith, for a time. Sean's mother, of German and Irish ancestry, is Catholic, and Sean's biological father, Michael Tell, is of Austrian Jewish descent.

NOTE ON JOHN ASTIN, SEAN'S FATHER FROM WIKIPEDIA:
He practices Nichiren Buddhism as a member of the worldwide Buddhist association Soka Gakkai International. (SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soka_Gakkai).

NOTE ON NICHIREN BUDDHISM FROM WIKIPEDIA: 

Nichiren Buddhism (Japanese), a branch of Mahayana Buddhism based on the teachings of the 13th century Japanese monk Nichiren (1222–1282) and belongs to the schools of so-called "Kamakura Buddhism". Nichiren Buddhism is generally noted for its focus on the Lotus Sutra and an attendant belief that all people have an innate Buddha nature and are therefore inherently capable of attaining enlightenment in their current form and present lifetime. It is also noted for its opposition to any other form of Buddhism, which Nichiren saw as deviating from the Buddhist truth he had discovered. Nichiren Buddhism is a comprehensive term covering several major schools and many sub-schools, as well as several of Japan's new religions. Its many denominations have in common a focus on the chanting and recital of the Lotus Sutra, which is thought to hold "extraordinary power".

Sean Astin Describes His "Christian Faith"; A Mixture of Catholic, Protestant and Buddhist, Coupled With the "Apocrypha" books:
VIDEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-wQC6GbNZw


Elijah & Sean Discuss Their "9" Tats;
(Nichiren Buddhist Tengwar "Nine" Tattoo):


_________________________________________________________
EWTN, (GLOBAL CATHOLIC NETWORK) CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY, 
SEEKS OUT & INTERVIEWS THE CAST & DIRECTOR TO ELICIT THEIR PSEUDO "CHRISTIAN" TESTIMONIES. (HINT: CATHOLICS ARE PSEUDO-CHRISTIANS PRACTICING ADAPTED PAGANISM):
IF ANY OF THE CAST & CREW WERE REAL CHRISTIANS THEY WOULD PREFER NOT TO VALIDATE CATHOLICISM BY BEING INTERVIEWED BY EWTN, WHO IN TURN VALIDATES THEM AS REAL CHRISTIANS.
NOT SO!



_______________________________________________________

ONE WORLD CHURCH & GOVERNMENT 

PORTRAYED & ENCOURAGED

SO, THE ONLY CONCLUSION WE CAN DRAW IS THAT THE EMERGING CHURCHES, SUCH AS LIBERTY BAPTIST, WANT TO ATTRACT PEOPLE 
OF LIKE MIND, THAT IS, IGNORANT, UNDISCERNING, AND COMPLIANT. 

LIKE RICK WARREN, THESE CHURCHES HAVE NO PROBLEM IDENTIFYING WITH FALSE CHRISTIANS, CATHOLICS, AND/OR BUDDHISTS; IN THIS CASE, THE CAST AND CREW BEING ROLE MODELS.
THAT IS A PERFECT FIT WITH THE COLLECTIVIST/SOCIALIST STATE BEING CREATED BEFORE OUR VERY EYES, ULTIMATELY UNITING UNDER ROME AND THE POPE.

GOD HELP US!


























VACCINE PROPAGANDA HORROR STORIES: SIT BACK, WATCH AND CRINGE~THEN ACT!

VACCINE HORROR STORIES THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW

Vaccines are NOT 100% safe and effective

Despite media talking heads constantly claiming vaccines are 100% “safe and effective,” these videos, and the very package inserts included with the vaccines, reveal that’s not the case at all.
“In our society today, newborns are injected with loads of chemicals nearly as soon as they enter the world,” Elizabeth Renter reported. “In the name of ‘prevention,’ we give them vaccines that we aren’t even sure are safe.”
“As a matter of fact, in many cases, we know them to be unsafe.”
Vaccines Brain Damaged My Daughter:
Doctor: Flu Vaccine Creating Killer Flu:

We're Heading Towards Full Scale Medical Tyranny


Shingles Vaccine Gives You Shingles!:

Deadly Side Affects Of Vaccines Revealed:

Military Brat: Vaccines Gave My Brother Autism:

Brain Eating Vaccines: The History and Facts:

Vaccine Horror Stories Revealed:

HIV Vaccine Causes HIV; 
GARDASIL Vaccine Causes Cervical Cancer:

Epidemic: Vaccines Killing Vets:

Little Girl Dies After Flu Shot Injection:

How U.S. Government Admits Vaccines Cause Autism:

Vaccine Pushers Channel Brian Williams:

Vaccine Victims Tell Their Story:

Dr. Unloads On "Safe" Vaccines:

Vaccine Death Coverup Implodes Worldwide:




Tuesday, February 17, 2015

APOSTATE STATE CHURCHES SELLING OBAMACARE AFTER SERVICES~THE "BODY IS A TEMPLE" NEEDING GOVERNMENT MANDATED HEALTH INSURANCE?~ANOTHER MISAPPLICATION OF ROMANS 13

APOSTATE STATE CHURCHES 
SELLING OBAMACARE AFTER SERVICES
"THE BODY IS A TEMPLE & IT MUST BE INSURED"?

1 Corinthians 6:19-20-
"Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body.


SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/apostate-state-churches-body-temple-must-insured/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In an effort to sign up as many consumers as possible for insurance under the Affordable Care Act (or Obamacare), the Obama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths to partner with churches and other faith-based groups, even publishing sample church bulletin inserts, flyers, and scripts for announcements, as well as “talking points.” These materials are part of the “Second Sunday & Faith Weekend of Action Toolkit,” which is available on the website of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
From the beginning, HHS has sought to develop partnerships with faith-based organizations to promote the Obamacare. This “toolkit” has been available since 2013. However, the details of these partnerships have largely escaped the attention of the national media. The Second Sunday & Faith Weekend of Action program encourages churches to use the second Sunday of each month during open enrollment to hold informational meetings and sign-up events. The sample bulletin insert appears as follows:
The suggested announcement includes insertion points for the name of the church promoting the event:
The materials also include two full pages of “talking points,” which end with an admonition to churches that “[y]ou are trusted messengers in this community. We hope you share this information with those around you so they can be connected with the care they need.”
Non-profits such as Community Health Connectors have also brought togeather churches and faith-based organizations with government officials for information regarding the ACA, recently even hosting an “off the record” conference call with First Lady Michelle Obama “to discuss how the Affordable Care Act is impacting the lives of your congregation members.”
HHS also offers to make officials from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) available to speak at church events. The CMS “2nd Sunday HIM [Health Insurance Marketplace] Enrollment for Faith and Community Event” form asks for contact information, desired topics and dates, and an audience profile, including if any “other CMS, HHS, Congressional Members or any other VIP officials expected to attend.”
In at least one case, a marketplace even invoked scripture as part of the enrollment push. In March 2014, D.C. HealthLink, the insurance marketplace for the nation’s capital assigned a theme to their Weekend of Action, “The Body is a Temple and it Must Be Insured,” drawing on I Corinthians 6:19, which says that “your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit.”
According to a recent blog post on the HHS website, more than 5,500 faith leaders have “promoted health insurance enrollment within their communities through efforts like the Second Sunday program.” The deadline for open enrollment for 2015 coverage is Sunday, February 15.


Sunday, February 15, 2015

LGBT: THOSE THAT BEND THE KNEE & THOSE WHO DON'T~NATURAL LAWS OF GOD NOT SUBJECT TO MAN

Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Leviticus 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.
Romans 1:26-28 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Exodus 22:19 - Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.
Romans 1:26 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

Daniel 3:14-18-"Nebuchadnezzar responded and said to them, "Is it true, Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego, that you do not serve my gods or worship the golden image that I have set up? "Now if you are ready, at the moment you hear the sound of the horn, flute, lyre, trigon, psaltery and bagpipe and all kinds of music, to fall down and worship the image that I have made, very well. But if you do not worship, you will immediately be cast into the midst of a furnace of blazing fire; and what god is there who can deliver you out of my hands?" Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego replied to the king, "O Nebuchadnezzar, we do not need to give you an answer concerning this matter. "If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the furnace of blazing fire; and He will deliver us out of your hand, O king. "But even if He does not, let it be known to you, O king, that we are not going to serve your gods or worship the golden image that you have set up."

Liberal News Anchor, Chris Cuomo:

“Our Rights Do Not Come From God”

NATURAL RIGHTS DENIED
Liberal Anchor: “Our Rights Do Not Come From God”
A COLLECTIVIST, SECULAR HUMANIST, SOCIALIST MINDSET

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/20119-liberal-anchor-our-rights-do-not-come-from-god; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…” These words are probably the best known in the Declaration of Independence, but perhaps not by CNN anchor Chris Cuomo (shown). Either that, or he simply doesn’t believe them. Because while debating the constitutionality of faux marriage Thursday morning, he said that our rights do not come from God, but man.
Toward the end of a passionate exchange with Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore in which the latter asserted that rights cannot be a product of man, Cuomo made his remark, saying, “Our rights do not come from God. That’s your faith, that’s my faith, but that’s not our country. Our laws come from collective agreement and compromise.”
Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, might be surprised to hear this. And there may be some who’d lament that the Founding Fathers didn’t have Chris Cuomo around to set them straight before ol‘ Tom put pen to paper. But others might note that Cuomo’s opinion was a very shallow statement that gets at some very deep issues.
First, the newsman seems to be confusing “laws” with “rights.” If our rights are from God, they exist apart from governmental laws, which man does create. And then one of the main purposes of law is to recognize and protect those rights. This is why the Declaration states, immediately after the pronouncement on Creator-endowed rights, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.” These rights are secured by government via the creation and enforcement of just law.
Why did the Founders emphasize rights’ divine origin? Because He (or he) who giveth can also taketh away.
As a related example, I’ve often made the point that if what we call “morality” comes from man, it then is illusory and will change with the winds of convenience. As I wrote at The New American in 2013:
To say that society determines “morality” is to simply put lipstick on the pig of man’s preferences about behavior. To analogize the matter, if we learned that 90 percent of the world preferred vanilla to chocolate, would this somehow make chocolate “wrong” or “evil”? No, it would simply be an issue of taste. But then how does it make any sense to say that murder is “wrong” if the only reason we do so is that the majority of the world prefers that one not kill in a way the majority calls “unjust”? If this is all it is, then murder falls into the same category as flavor: taste.
Of course, since our preferences masquerading as “morality” and minted as “values” would be created by man, it follows they can be recreated by him. And then the “creator” becomes the highest worldly power, be he a Hitler, Mao, Stalin, or tomorrow’s tyrant.
The same is true of marriage, mind you. Ignored in the debate surrounding it is that the stage was set for faux marriage ages ago, when the wider society accepted that marriage could be just a governmental contract rubber-stamped by a justice of the peace. Note that the long-held position in Christendom (when it really could be called Christendom) was that a man and woman were joined in matrimony by God; this is why many churches consider marriage a Sacrament. It then followed that “what God hath joined, let no man put asunder.” Once we began to believe marriage was a human creation, however, this became, “What man hath joined, he may put asunder.” This first led to easy divorce. Now the very definition of marriage itself is being put asunder.
It is no different with rights. The Founders emphasized that our rights come from God because then no person,with credibility and weight of moral force, could put them asunder. But if they’re minted by man — if the collective is their “creator” — man can recreate them. The collective can take them away.
Returning to Cuomo, his statement reflects something I addressed yesterday and that is all too common today: a denial of objective reality. For when he said, “Our rights do not come from God. That’s your faith, that’s my faith, but that’s not our country,” he implied that faith is a mere flavor, a preference, that it can have no basis in reality and thus should not influence law. You say potāto and I say potăto, you like vanilla and I like chocolate (harking back to my earlier analogy), but these are mere tastes, and we don’t enforce tastes via law. Those are your likes — don’t impose them on me.
This certainly is the fashionable view today. Secularists will say, “Separation of church and state! Keep your faith out of my government!” But not only is the “separation of church and state” not in the Constitution, there can be no true separation of church and law — if that law is to be just. I’ll explain.
Although it’s also fashionable to say now, “You can’t legislate morality,” all just laws do so; they impose right and wrong or a corollary thereof. Think about it: Would you create a law prohibiting something that wasn’t wrong? Would you create a law mandating something that wasn’t a moral imperative? There are laws that do so, unjust laws; and there are people who do so, tyrants. In these cases laws can become capricious, with preference and taste supplanting principle and Truth as the stuff of official decree. This isn’t to say that all, or even most, wrongs and moral imperatives should be legislated, only that all just legislation reflects wrongs and moral imperatives.
So when making laws, we must legislate morality. But what is morality? Getting back to my block-quoted example, if at issue is just man’s invention, then we’re not talking about morality but mere human preference, that stuff of tyrannical laws. To be morality, properly understood, it must be an unchanging, universal, and eternal yardstick determining right and wrong that exists apart from man; in other words, God’s law.
So, simply put, for man’s laws to be just they must be based on morality, and for morality to be morality it must be God’s law; therefore, man’s laws must be based on God’s law. What is the only other alternative? That they will reflect someone else’s.
This is why, in reality, while we certainly can have a Congress that “shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” it’s impossible to have a just government coupled with that very different thing: true separation of church and state. This is why Founder Gouverneur Morris wrote, “Religion is the only solid base of morals and … morals are the only possible support of free governments.” It is why Founder James Wilson counseled, “Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is divine…. Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other.” And it is why early American speaker of the U.S. House Robert Winthrop outlined the two alternatives thus: “Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled either by a power within them or by a power without them; either by the Word of God or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible or by the bayonet.”
Then again, we could just listen to CNN and Chris Cuomo.
____________________________________________________________________

Chris Cuomo Battles AL Justice Roy Moore
in Epic CNN Interview on Gay Marriage


_________________________________________________________

PREPARING THE WAY FOR
SAME SEX MARRIAGE APPROVAL SOON:
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
on Same-Sex Marriage,
Women's Rights, Health
_________________________________

SEE: http://pflagdetroit.org/Friends_Web_Links.html
QUOTE FROM ABOVE LINK: 
"Ford Globe's goals are mutually beneficial between GLOBE members and 
Ford Motor Company. By helping to maintain a safe, supportive work 
environment for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people at Ford, 
enhancing their loyalty and productivity, Ford GLOBE helps Ford Motor 
Company to achieve its goal of becoming the world's premier automotive 
company."

Ford Contractor Says He Was Fired 

for Speaking Against Company’s 

Support of Homosexuality

February 8, 2015 by Heather Clark

informational, educational, and research purposes:

DEARBORN, Mich. – A former contractor for Ford Motor Company has filed a religious discrimination complaint, alleging that he was fired for speaking against the company’s support of homosexuality.
Thomas Banks has worked as a design and release engineer for Ford since 2011—that is until last August when he was fired on an accusation that he had violated the company’s “anti-harassment” policy for responding to an email employee newsletter from the company. The newsletter contained an article regarding the 20th anniversary of Ford’s Gay, Lesbian Or Bisexual Employees advocacy group (GLOBE).
Banks replied with a comment to express disagreement.
“Endorsing and promoting sodomy is of benefit to no one,” he wrote. “This topic is disruptive to the workplace and is an assault on Christians and morality, as well as antithetical to our design and our survival. Immoral sexual conduct should not be a topic for an automotive manufacturer to endorse or promote.”
“Heterosexual behavior creates life—homosexual behavior leads to death,” Banks continued.
But after submitting the comment, the contractor received an email from a human relations representative, requesting a meeting to “discuss something that was brought to my attention.” When Banks met with the individual, he was informed that he might have violated the company’s anti-harassment policy because of the comment he submitted.
He later received a voicemail informing him that he had been fired.


“I was stunned to realize that I was fired over expressing my faith in a single comment,” Banks said in a statement. “It felt like Ford was saying, ‘Even if you are respectful, your faith, and you as a Christian, are unwelcome at Ford.’”
Ford has also released a statement on the matter, but hasn’t commented on the specific complaint.
“[W]e believe this matter ultimately is between the individual and their agency employer,” it wrote. “Ford’s anti-harassment policy was created to foster a respectful, inclusive work environment for all, and we expect employees and agency personnel to act in accordance with this policy.”
With the assistance of the Liberty Institute in Texas, which provides legal services free for clients, Banks filed a complaint last month with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, contending that Ford had violated Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
“If you read harassment to mean disagreement—which is what a lot of companies and people are increasingly starting to do—they’re saying, ‘If you disagree, you must hate,'” attorney Steve Cloty told reporters. “If we do that, there’s no freedom at all. We’re not diverse, we’re not tolerant, we’re not inclusive. We’ve just said, ‘Nobody can disagree,’ which is a scary thought.”
“We are shocked that Ford Motor Company would terminate one of their employees simply because he expressed his faith,” added Hiram Sasser, Liberty Institute Director of Litigation. “If Ford is allowed to get away with firing Mr. Banks over this comment, we fear that every person of faith will be punished for talking about his or her faith in the workplace. At Ford, if you speak about your faith as it relates to the company, even to the company, you may be terminated.”
___________________________________________________________

Christian engineer seeks EEOC's 

help in Ford firing






YEMEN: U.S. MARINES ORDERED TO DESTROY THEIR WEAPONS & SURRENDER VEHICLES FLEEING EMBASSY~THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS DESTROYED BY EMBASSY STAFF



OBAMA'S BOWING TO TERRORISM AGAIN;
OUR MILITARY PAYS THE PRICE



SEE ALLEN WEST'S ARTICLE HERE: 
http://allenbwest.com/2015/02/marines-ordered-destroy-weapons-fleeing-us-embassy-yemen-obama-broadcasts-everything-hes-not-going-isis/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

I remember watching cowboy and Indian movies when I was a little kid and the Indians would say something like, “White man speak with forked tongue.” Yesterday President Obama delivered another statement on his “strategy” for ISIS and all I could think about is “black man in White House speak with forked tongue.”
The analogy is with a snake (never a complement) and means to deliberately mislead – saying one thing, and meaning another. As Obama was delivering his weak message — which we heard back in August last year to which I responded here — there were individuals from his own administration contradicting his words.
President Obama said ISIS morale is low? Hmm, doesn’t seem that way to most of us. And just so you all know, there is only one time in U.S. military history when air power defeated an enemy. That was in the Pacific theater of operations when two bombs were dropped – on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
I recall countless bombings during the Vietnam War — Linebacker I and II – and I don’t think we defeated Ho Chi Minh, the Viet Cong, or the NVA. As a young captain during Desert Shield and Storm, I watched the skies as a real air armada and campaign was waged — I mean hundreds of sorties (flights) a day. But against ISIS we are averaging around six.
So Obama came out sounding tough and once again told the enemy what he was NOT going to do and what this is NOT going to be. And he also told the enemy that we’re just going to do this for three years — and then I guess we’ll just quit and go home. What a coincidence, Obama is only around for two more years.
Back in August we were told ISIS would be degraded, defeated, and destroyed — yeah, right. President Obama is “banning” any enduring offensive ground operations. What in the Sam Hill does that mean?
However, as Obama was speaking there was a revelation emanating out of Yemen — remember, that strategic success story – which is utterly disturbing.
As reported by the Business Insider, “Armed Houthi rebels in the Yemeni capital Sanaa seized US embassy vehicles after the ambassador and diplomats left the country on Wednesday, local members of embassy staff told Reuters.
“The employees said that more than 20 vehicles were taken by the fighters after the Americans departed from Sanaa’s airport. Yemen-based analyst Haykal Bafana tweeted that US personnel surrendered 30 vehicles to Houthi militants. CNN is reporting that Houthi militants took “all US Embassy vehicles” parked at Sanaa’s airport as US personnel left the country and confiscated weapons from departing US Marines. If this is true, then forbidding American embassy security to travel with their weapons represents a major breach of diplomatic protocol on the part of Houthi rebels, who are now one of the country’s dominant political forces after the fall of Yemen’s government last week.”
The updated report from the US Marine Corps is that the State Department ordered them to render their personal weapons inoperable while they destroyed the “crew served weapons” — in other words machine gun-type weapons. Also, these Marines were not evacuated on military aircraft such as the Osprey, which were right off shore. Instead they were flown out on private aircraft. This situation marks one of the most embarrassing episodes in US Marine Security Guard history. This is the same State Department that met with Muslim Brotherhood officials two weeks ago.
Ok, let me explain something, I served a three-year joint assignment with the Marines. Every Marine is an infantryman, a fighter, warrior first, and they are damned proud to tell you that is their distinction. For someone to order a Marine to render his weapon inoperable is unconscionable.
So we are to believe an Obama administration that orders Marine Embassy Security Guards to scurry out the back door is supposed to defeat ISIS? Do you know what the message must be across the jihadist websites and chat rooms right now? What an embarrassment, and just imagine how those Marines felt.
“CNN added that Embassy staff “destroyed weapons that were inside the embassy’s storage warehouses” along with “tens of thousands of documents.” This is hardly the first time that US equipment in the country may have fallen into the wrong hands. Earlier this month, an unnamed US defense official told The Guardian that the US had only a limited ability to perform end-use checks on the $400 million worth of equipment and other military aid Washington has sent to Yemen since 2006.”
So we now have another Islamic terrorist organization armed with American combat equipment — ISIS being the other.
Here’s a discomfiting thought: Iranian-backed Islamists control the capitol cities of Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and are causing issues in Bahrain. We can expect another Hezbollah/Hamas style entity to gain strength, something that cannot please Saudi Arabia.
Business Insider writes, “Yemen is home to the al-Qaida branch considered most capable of attacking external targets and that took credit for the January attack on the satirical French newspaper Charlie Hebdo. And the Houthis are a Shi’ite militia movement allied with Iran. The absence of the US from Yemen during a time when a Tehran-backed group is consolidating power will hardly reassure American allies in the region, particularly Saudi Arabia. The Sanaa embassy is also reportedly the site of a CIA station whose capabilities might be curtailed now that its diplomatic cover has been lost.”
I wonder if the CIA covert operators were forced to destroy their weapons as well?
Does President Obama have any credibility to fight ISIS? That’s not for you to answer — I pose the question to our enemies, as they have the ultimate vote. And they are voting loudly. Just ask the families and friends of the four Americans who’ve been killed.
We are allowing evil to exist and persist. Sir Edmund Burke stated, “all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” And no, Congressional authorization for Obama won’t do anything to change the evil of Islamic terrorism. Why? Because some inane liberal progressive socialist will make a foolhardy decision to make our Warriors lay down their weapons.

Marines ordered to destroy weapons while fleeing US 



embassy in Yemen; Obama broadcasts everything he’s not going to do against ISIS

NEW JERSEY GOOSE STEPS TOWARD ABSOLUTE POLICE OBEDIENCE BY SCHOOLCHILDREN~OMITS BILL OF RIGHTS IN PROPOSED LAW

THE NEW JERSEY POLICE STATE WILL REQUIRE SCHOOLCHILDREN TO OBEY POLICE WITHOUT PROTECTING THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

edison-police-presencejpg-5ccd22446b2cc5c2_large.jpg
A police officer Abbas Husain talking to eighth graders during community day at 

Herbert Hoover School in Edison in this 2010 file photo (Alexandra Pais/For The 

Star-Ledger)

Matt Friedman | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com By Matt Friedman | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com 
Email the author | Follow on Twitter 
on February 10, 2015 at 8:30 AM, updated February 10, 2015 at 10:46 AM
TRENTON — New Jersey schools would be required to teach students how they should interact with police officers under proposed legislation a sponsor says could protect both kids and cops.
The bill, (A4130), introduced last week, would require school districts to come up with instructions for students as part of their Social Studies Core Curriculum Content Standards that would include "the role and responsibilities of a law enforcement official in providing for public safety" and "an individual's responsibilities to comply with a directive from a law enforcement official."
One of the sponsors, state Assemblyman Ralph Caputo (D-Essex), said the bill was inspired partly by recent incidents of police shootings around the country, including the death of Michael Brown in Ferugson, Mo.
"Kids have to learn how to behave when they're being investigated or talked to, because they could put themselves in jeopardy," Caputo said. "It's also a good effort to protect the police. Kids have to recognize their authority when they're being questioned and how to conduct themselves."
Caputo said the legislation takes no sides as to who was right and wrong in the incidents. It just seeks to stop altercations before they start.
"When a kid jumps out of a car, he may appear to be threatening but he's not - he just may not understand what those protocols are," Caputo said.
In New York City, a high school principal brought New York Civil Liberties Union representatives into the classroom to coach kids on what to do. The group instructed students to be polite and keep their hands visible, according to reports, as well as on their constitutional rights. And school officials in Linwood, in south Jersey, told the Press of Atlantic City last month that they were considering how to teach students safe interaction with police.
Assemblywoman Grace Spencer (D-Essex), a co-sponsor, said that the teaching could "break down any misconceptions that children might have from either misinformation or just the wrong portrayal of police officers through media."
Spencer is a municipal prosecutor in Newark and has a brother on the city's police force, as well as another who is a retired from the force.
"Not every police officer is bad. Not every police officer is necessarily good. However, there are certain things that you should and should not do when you encounter the police that will not cause a situation to escalate into something that could become dangerous for either person involved," she said.
Although the legislation leaves it up to the district to come up with the curriculum, which would be taught from elementary through high school, it should be characterized by "mutual cooperation and respect."
Pat Colligan, president of the New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Association, said he agrees with the idea behind the bill, though he would like to know more about how it would be implemented.
"I kind of wish they'd have reached out to us in the beginning," Colligan said. "I think any dialogue is positive dialogue. I'd be all for it as long as it's a well-rounded class and people understand some of the limitations that we have when we're dealing with a deadly force situation ... It's usually time. People seem to think we have this 10 minute period to think out what we're going to do when you're given that short amount of time and short distance."
Ari Rosmarin, public policy director for the New Jersey ACLU, said the legislation is missing a critical component.
"The bill calls for education on young peoples' roles and responsibilities, but it's missing the third R: rights. The classroom is the appropriate place for a know-your-rights education," Rosmarin said. "Recent events make a strong case for New Jersey's young people being made aware of their rights and how to protect them when interacting with the police."
Rosmarin said his group hopes to work with the sponsor to include those provisions, and that "we hope to see officers receive equally robust training about interacting with young people in New Jersey's community."
The chief sponsor of the bill, Sheila Oliver (D-Essex), did not respond to requests for comment. The measure has nine sponsors in total, seven from Essex County and two from Passaic County.