Translate

Thursday, December 26, 2013

ROMAN CATHOLIC ASCETICISM PERMEATING CHRISTIANITY

ROMAN CATHOLIC ASCETICISM
PERMEATING CHRISTIANITY
Dec 26, 2013
December 26, 2013 (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org; for instructions about subscribing and unsubscribing or changing addresses, see the information paragraph at the end of the article) 
The following is from the book:
 CONTEMPLATIVE MYSTICISM: 
A POWERFUL ECUMENICAL BOND
Contemplative mysticism, which originated with Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox monasticism, is permeating every branch of Christianity today, including the Southern Baptist Convention. In this book we document the fact that Catholic mysticism leads inevitably to a broadminded ecumenical philosophy and to the adoption of heresies. For many, this path has led to interfaith dialogue, Buddhism, Hinduism, universalism, pantheism, panentheism, even goddess theology. One chapter is dedicated to exposing the heresies of Richard Foster: "Evangelicalism's Mystical Sparkplug." We describe the major contemplative practices, such as centering prayer, visualizing prayer, Jesus Prayer, Lectio Divina, and the Labyrinth. We look at the history of Roman Catholic Monasticism, beginning with the Desert Fathers and the Church Fathers, and document the heresies associated with it, such as its sacramental gospel, rejection of the Bible as sole authority, veneration of Mary, purgatory, celibacy, asceticism, allegoricalism, and moral corruption. We examine the errors of contemplative mysticism, such as downplaying the centrality of the Bible, ignoring the fact that multitudes of professing Christians are not born again, exchanging the God of the Bible for a blind idol, ignoring the Bible's warnings against associating with heresy and paganism, and downplaying the danger of spiritual delusion. In the Biographical Catalog of Contemplative Mystics we look at the lives and beliefs of 60 of the major figures in the contemplative movement, including Benedict of Nursia, Bernard of Clairvaux, Brother Lawrence, Catherine of Genoa, Catherine of Siena, Dominic, Meister Eckhart, Francis of Assisi, Madame Guyon, Hildegard of Bingen, Ignatius of Loyola, John of the Cross, Julian of Norwich, Thomas Keating, Thomas a Kempis, Brennan Manning, Thomas Merton, Henri Nouwen, Basil Pennington, John Michael Talbot, Teresa of Avila, Teresa of Lisieux, and Dallas Willard. The book contains an extensive index. 482 pages.Contemplative Mysticism is available in print and eBook formats, www.wayoflife.org Roman Catholic Asceticism
____________________________
Rome's Desert Fathers and mystic "saints" practiced extreme asceticism. Many doubtless put themselves into an early grave. Hildegard's "strict practices of fasting and self-punishment, resulted in a lifetime of health problems and migraine headaches" (Talbot, The Way of the Mystics, p. 55). John of the Cross so abused his body that, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "twice he was saved from certain death by the intervention of the Blessed Virgin."
After a study of the desert monastics, we tend to agree with Edward Gibbon, the famous historian of the Roman Empire. He described the typical desert monk as a "distorted and emaciated maniac ... spending his life in a long routine of useless and atrocious self-torture, and quailing before the ghastly phantoms of his delirious brain." Gibbon said, "They were sunk under the painful weight of crosses and chains; and their emaciated limbs were confined by collars, bracelets, gauntlets, and greaves of massy and rigid iron" (Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire). 
The ascetic practices have many purposes, but none of them are scriptural. 
They were thought to be necessary for salvation and sanctification. Pio of Pietrelcina said: "Let us now consider what we must do to ensure that the Holy Spirit may dwell in our souls. ... The mortification must be constant and steady, not intermittent, and it must last for one's whole life. Moreover, the perfect Christian must not be satisfied with a kind of mortification which merely appears to be severe. He must make sure that it hurts" ("Mortification of the Flesh," Wikipedia). 
Ascetic practices are also thought to be necessary as part of the path to ecstatic union with God. We have seen that self-denial and self-injury composed the first step in the three-step path to mystical union. 
Ascetic practices are also thought to be necessary as penance for sin. In his Spiritual Exercises Ignatius of Loyola taught that penance requires "chastising the body by inflicting sensible pain on it" through "wearing hairshirts, cords, or iron chains on the body, or by scourging or wounding oneself, and by other kinds of austerities" (The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, First Week, Vintage Spiritual Classics, p. 31). Pope John XXIII wrote: "But the faithful must be encouraged to do outward acts of penance, both to keep their bodies under the strict control of reason and faith, and to make amends for their own and other people's sins" (Paenitentiam Agere, July 1, 1962). Yet we know that the believer's sin is forgiven through the blood of Christ and not through his own self-effort and sacrifice (1 John 1:9). 
Ascetic practices are further thought to be necessary because the body and its physical pleasures are evil. John of the Cross, one of the most acclaimed of the Catholic mystical theologians, considered physical existence, with all its attendant needs and desires, as inherently sinful (Talbot, The Way of the Mystics, p. 148). Francis of Assisi called his own body "Brother Ass." This error goes back to the Platonic and gnostic philosophy that was imbibed by the Desert Fathers and Church Fathers. 
Some of the common ascetic practices of the monastic mystics were as follows:
Extreme fasting
For part of her life Catherine of Siena lived exclusively on the wine and wafer of the Mass. Peter of Alcantara, who was Teresa of Avila's spiritual director, ate only once in three days at the most. The diet in many monasteries is meager. Consider the Order of Cistercians of the Strict Observance. The monks subsist on a small amount of food for part of the year and are never allowed to eat meat, fish, or eggs. 
Self-flagellation 
Dominic Loricatus (995-1060), a Benedictine monk, lashed himself 300,000 times with a whip in one six-day period (Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol. V). He did this while reciting the Psalms, 100 lashes for each psalm. Catherine of Siena scourged herself three times a day with an iron chain. Theresa of the Child Jesus "scourged herself with all the strength and speed of which she was capable, smiling at the crucifix through her tears." Hildegard of Bingen recommended "maceration of the flesh, and heavy beatings" to ward off lascivious lusts. 
Hairshirts
A hairshirt was something uncomfortable worn next to the skin. Commonly it was made of some uncomfortable fabric such as horsehair, but some were made of metal. Henry Suso's loins were covered with scars from his horsehair shirt. He also devised an undergarment studded with 150 sharp brass nails that pierced his skin. Dominic Loricatus and Ignatius of Loyola wore hairshirts of chain mail. 
Bindings
Ignatius had the habit of binding a cord below the knee. The seers of Fatima wore tight cords around their waists. Catherine of Siena wrapped a chain with crosses around her body so tightly that it caused her to bleed; it is described as an "iron spiked girdle." "Her self-punishment left her body covered with gaping wounds, which she blithely referred to as her 'flowers'" (Talbot,The Way of the Mystics, p. 81). 
Foregoing hygiene 
Anthony never bathed his body nor even washed his feet. Henry Suso didn't take a bath in 25 years. For a while Ignatius of Loyola didn't bathe, wore rags, and let his hair and nails grow "wildly out of control." In the Order of Cistercians of Strict Observance, Thomas Merton's order, monks are allowed to wash their robes only once a month and they can take showers only by permission of the abbot. It should be called the order of stinky.
Sleep depravation
Catherine of Siena allowed herself only one-half hour of sleep every other day on a hard board. No wonder she had strange visions! Peter of Alcantara slept only one and a half hours a day for 40 years. Catherine of Genoa slept as little as possible and then on a bed covered with briars and thistles.
Silence and solitude
Silence and solitude is a big part of Catholic monastic asceticism. The hermit Theon, one of the "desert fathers," kept silent for thirty years. Abbot Moses told a young man who asked for guidance, "Go, sit in your cell, and your cell will teach you everything" (The Way of the Mystics, p. 24). Romuald, the founder of the Camaldolese order, says the hermit must "sit in his cell like a chick, and destroy himself completely" (Talbot,Come to the Quiet, p. 22). Cistercian monks take vows of silence and communicate among themselves only by sign language. Teresa of Avila demanded that the nuns in her order not talk to each other or be together except when eating and worshiping. She said, "Each one should be alone in her cell" (The Way of Perfection, chap. 4, p. 29).
Separation from relatives 
Many of the monasteries and convents disallowed the monks and nuns to associate with their relatives. Teresa of Lisieux and her four sisters were nuns in Carmelite convents, and when their father had a series of strokes that left him severely handicapped, they were not allowed to visit him. This is contrary to God's command to honor and care for one's own near relations (1 Tim. 5:8). 
Paul warned that some would turn from the faith and teach the doctrines of demons, and he identified two of these doctrines as "forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats..." (1 Timothy 4:1-3). 
A plainer description of Catholic monastic asceticism has never been written! 
Paul warned about asceticism in Colossians 2:20-23. 
The ascetics find biblical support for their practices in Paul's statement in 1 Corinthians 9:27 -- "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway." 
But nowhere does Paul say that he performed the type of asceticism that is practiced by the Catholic monastics. He listed many things that he suffered, but for the most part they were things that he was subjected to by outside forces and by dint of the performance of his preaching ministry (2 Corinthians 11:23-27). Paul was not punishing his body and ruining his health through mindless asceticism. 
In the New Testament, fasting is not a way of punishing oneself; it is a matter of spiritual warfare (Matthew 17:19-21). 
Further, Paul was not talking about his salvation or his sanctification but about his ministry. Paul was concerned that he would be a castaway in the sense that he would be put on a shelf in this life so that he could no longer exercise his ministry and/or that his service would be rejected, disapproved at the judgment seat of Christ. The same Greek word is translated "rejected." Paul was not afraid that he would be lost. In the same epistle he taught that Christ preserves the believer (1 Cor. 1:7-9). What Paul feared was falling short of God's high calling for his life. The context makes this plain. He is talking about running a race and winning a prize. 
To confuse 1 Corinthians 9:27 with salvation is to misunderstand the gospel of Jesus Christ. Salvation is not a reward for faithful service. The Bible plainly states that salvation is by grace, and grace is the free, unmerited mercy of God (Eph. 2:8-9). Anything that is merited or earned, is not grace (Romans 11:6). On the other hand, after we are saved by the marvelous grace of God, we are called to serve Jesus Christ. We are created in Christ Jesus "unto good works" (Eph. 2:10). If a believer is lazy and carnal, he will be chastened by the Lord (Heb. 12:6-8), and if he does not respond, God will take him home (Rom. 8:13; 1 Cor. 11:30; 1 John5:16). 
_________________________________________________

PA. PREGNANT NURSE FIRED FOR REFUSING FLU VACCINE

PREGNANT NURSE REFUSES FLU VACCINE 
AFTER READING ABOUT HARMFUL INGREDIENTS 
THAT COULD HURT FETUS

COMMON CORE PORNOGRAPHIC BOOKS~PARENTS BEWARE!

Parents: Beware of Common Core Porn!
UPDATE FEBRUARY 23, 2014:
SEE: http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/02/21/common-core-pornography/?singlepage=true
The Women of Grace blog has posted the following at:




black swan greenExperts are sounding the alarm about the presence of pornographic materials that are included in the exemplars recommended by Common  Core State Standards (CCSS).
In a hard-hitting article just published in Crisis Magazine, Mary Jo Anderson, author and member of the Women of Grace® Board of Directors, reports that parents and teachers across the nation are discovering sexually inappropriate materials being recommended by the CCSS.
For instance, New York State’s CCSS lists excerpts from the book, Black Swan Green, as required reading for ninth graders.
“Black Swan Green features a 13-year-old boy as the narrator who graphically describes his father’s genitals and a sex act,” Anderson reports. “It has been suggested that because all of the excerpts do not contain explicitly sexual material some students would read only the required portions of the book. Others scoff at the idea that once the books are in a student’s possession that the sexually graphic material would be skipped over.”
This isn’t the only troublesome book on the list. Jen Costabile, an English teacher in the Newburgh, New York  school district told Anderson that “At least three of the books listed on the modules [curriculums] contain passages using inappropriate language and visual imagery that most people would consider pornographic.”
One of those books, The Bluest Eye, by Pulitzer Prize winning author Toni Morrison has now been banned in several school districts because it depicts rape, incest, sexual violence and pedophilia. The pedophile in the book claims God as his inspiration, saying “I work only through the Lord. He sometimes uses me to help people.”
“Worse, however, is that the novel is written with sympathy for the pedophile,” Anderson writes. “Morrison defends her character, and reportedly wrote the story so the reader becomes a ‘co-conspirator’ with the pedophile.”
New York isn’t the only place where CCSS is going off the rails. In Buena High School in Sierra Vista, Arizona, parents pressured the school into removing a sexually explicit novel entitled Dreaming in Cuban by Cristina Garcia because it contains teen sado-masochism.
Barbara Hansen, a former elementary school teacher, described the book as “child pornography” saying that “We’re bludgeoning their souls with this kind of material. It’s debauchery, and it’s just not worthy of our students.”
Who's in a FamilySchool Superintendent, Kriss Hagerl admitted that had the district known about the book’s offensive content they would have advised teachers to select an alternative.  “We’ve learned a lesson in this, and we’ll make sure to put those steps in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again,” Hagerl said, according to the Associated Press.
Catholic schools are experiencing the same problems. Two first-grade books about families that depicted same-sex couples and divorce in a positive light, had to be removed from the CCSS after parents complained.
The Family Book by Todd Parr suggests that “Some families include stepmoms, stepdads, stepsisters, or stepbrothers; some adopt children.  Other families have two moms or two dads, while some children have only one parent.”
Who’s in a Family? by Robert Skutch and All Kinds of Families by Norma Simon were also struck from the recommended reading list for the same reason.
As Catholic Education Daily points out, none of these books reflect Catholic teaching about families as explained in the Catechism:
“A man and a woman united in marriage, together with their children, form a family. This institution is prior to any recognition by public authority, which has an obligation to recognize it. It should be considered the normal reference point by which the different forms of family relationship are to be evaluated” (No. 2202).
Anderson’s report alerts parents and educators to yet another problem in the highly controversial Common Core system.
“The deep flaws of the Common Core system of standards and accompanying ‘exemplars’ serves to remind citizens of the wisdom of the Tenth Amendment,” Anderson writes. “Education belongs to the States; to the local community where community standards are best decided by the people who know their fellow citizens.”
______________________________________________________________

Monday, December 23, 2013

MORE CATHOLIC GODDESS IDOLATRY: OUR LADY OF WALSINGHAM, ENGLAND~ECUMENICAL CATHOLIC & ANGLICAN SHRINES~A DOUBLE DOSE OF THE OCCULT

THE DEMONIC OCCULT WORSHIP OF

Our Lady of Walsingham




ROMAN CATHOLIC SHRINE AT WALSINGHAM
ANGLICAN SHRINE AT WALSINGHAM
SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Walsingham; Our Lady of Walsingham is a title of Mary the mother of Jesus. The title derives from the belief that Mary appeared in a vision to Richeldis de Faverches, a devout English noblewoman, in 1061 in the village of Walsingham in Norfolk, England. Lady Richeldis had a Holy House built in Walsingham which became a shrine and place of pilgrimage.

Richeldis de Faverches: Richeldis de Faverches was a devout English noblewoman, who is credited with establishing the original shrine of Our Lady of Walsingham. The appearance of Our Lady of Walsingham to Richeldis de Faverches is one of the earliest Marian apparitions.

According to Roman Catholic and Anglican belief, Richeldis de Faverches wished to do something special to honour the Blessed Virgin Mary and in 1061 had a series of three visions in which the Virgin Mary appeared to her.[2] In these visions Richeldis was shown the house of the Annunciation in Nazareth, and was requested to build a replica of the Holy House in Walsingham, as a place of pilgrimage where people could honour Our Lady. The Blessed Virgin is said to have promised, Let all who are in any way distressed or in need seek me there in that small house that you maintain for me at Walsingham. To all that seek me there shall be given succour.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richeldis_de_Faverches

Our Lady of Walsingham: See: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_apparition#Our_Lady_of_Walsingham

According to the tradition of Our Lady of Walsingham, the Virgin Mary appeared in a vision to Richeldis de Faverches, a devout Saxon noblewoman, in 1061 in Walsingham, England, instructing her to construct a shrine resembling the place of the Annunciation. The shrine passed into the care of the Canons Regular sometime between 1146 and 1174.
Late in 1538, King Henry VIII’s soldiers sacked the priory at Walsingham, killed two monks and destroyed the shrine. In 1897 Pope Leo XIII re-established the restored 14th century Slipper Chapel as a Roman Catholic shrine. The Holy House had been rebuilt at the Catholic Church of the Annunciation at King's Lynn (Walsingham was part of this Catholic parish in 1897).
Today there are two shrines at Walsingham: the Roman Catholic shrine centered on the Slipper Chapel and the Holy House maintained by the Church of England. There are also two separate feast days: September 24 in the Roman Catholic Church and October 15 in the Anglican Communion.
VIDEOS:

The LMS walking pilgrimage to Walsingham in August 2013:


Anglican Archbishop visits Our Lady of Walsingham:

Published on Aug 23, 2013


There are two shrines to Our Lady in Walsingham. One is Roman Catholic, the other is Anglican ( Church of England ) The one featured in this BBC news item is the Anglican one.

Walsingham Bible Witness:



Uploaded on Jun 3, 2010 on YouTube:

About 25-30 of us made our way down to Walsingham for this years show of idolatry and worship of Mary. We were there to present the real Gospel message of grace alone through Jesus Christ alone.

Along with the preaching, a number of conversations were had with people about their eternal souls and the way to heaven. We also had some opportunity to witness to the 'clergy' afterwards. And many tracts given out too.

I was thinking while there, can one think of any other occasion where there are two opposing groups (one protesting against the other) where there is no need of any barriers or police keeping them apart? I can't. Which shows we are not there to do battle with men, but rather through the love of Jesus Christ and His saving power alone to point sinners to Him who alone can save a soul.

The last time Mary ever appears in the Bible is the first chapter of the Acts of the Apostles. Never does she appear after that. There is not one single mention of her in any of the New Testament letters. Whilst Mary was blessed amongst all woman, she was no more than that -a highly favoured and privileged woman, used as the human instrument in the incarnation of Jesus Christ. Yet even she herself confessed her sin and the need of a Saviour. 'MY SPIRIT HATH REJOICED IN GOD MY SAVIOUR (LUKE 1V47).

We must not turn such a favoured woman into that which she is not; and give a position to her that she does not have and that God has not given. We are not to pray to her, confess our sins to her, or ask her for aid or help when in need. The Bible is clear -'There is one God, and one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus' ( 1 Timothy 2v5)

Walsingham Gospel Witness:

Published on Dec 10, 2013


Gospel Witness at Walsingham in the face of idolatry and the veneration of Mary at the place of one of England's so called holy shrines.

Christian witness at Walsingham broadcast on the BBC. The Mary Movement. See and listen:

COMMON CORE: SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY REJECTS IT

Reported by Freedom Works at:
http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/britthem/the-anti-common-core-movement-gains-a-new-ally:

"The Anti-Common Core Movement Gains a New Ally":  This week, the GOP Executive Committee in South Carolina unanimously voted to reject Common Core standards. The resolution, which can be viewed here, is a huge step forward in the fight against Common Core. Also shown below in its entirety, unedited. See: 

http://www.scgop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/SCGOP-Res-CommonCore.pdf


A RESOLUTION OF 
THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 
TO REJECT COMMON CORE IN SOUTH CAROLINA 
Passed December 16, 2013 by a unanimous vote of the S.C. Republican Party State Executive Committee 

WHEREAS, in 2010 officials in the Executive Branch committed our state to participation in the Common Core State Standards Initiative through the federal Race to the Top grant application; and 
WHEREAS, this participation required our state to adopt the Common Core standards in K-12 English 
language arts and mathematics, and to commit to implementing the national SMARTER Balanced (SBAC) assessments, all without legislative oversight and without public input; and 
WHEREAS, adoption of Common Core obliterates South Carolina’s constitutional autonomy over education in English language arts and mathematics, placing control in the hands of the federal government and unaccountable private interests in Washington, DC; and 
WHEREAS, the Common Core standards have been evaluated by experts as mediocre at best, and based on questionable philosophies; and 
WHEREAS, the Common Core standards will inevitably lead to a national curriculum, in violation of three federal statutes; and 
WHEREAS, the Common Core scheme will be expanded to include national standards and curriculum in science, social studies, and other subjects; and 
WHEREAS, neither the Common Core standards nor the SBAC assessments were ever piloted to determine their effectiveness; and 
WHEREAS, both the Common Core standards and the SBAC tests will impose an enormous unfunded 
mandate on our state and our local school districts; and 
WHEREAS, Common Core is part of a national scheme that includes collection and sharing of massive 
amounts of personal student and teacher data; 

THEREFORE, the South Carolina Republican Party hereby resolves that our state leaders should: 
“Withdraw our state from the Common Core State Standards Initiative; 
Withdraw our state from the SBAC assessment scheme, and any other testing aligned with the Common Core standards; 
Prohibit all state officials from entering into any agreement that cedes any measure of control over South Carolina education to entities outside the state and ensure that all content standards and curriculum decisions are adopted through a transparent state-wide process fully accountable to the citizens of South Carolina; and 
Prohibit the collection of personal student data for any non-educational purpose, and the sharing of 
personal data except with schools or education agencies within the state.” 



OBAMA: GENESIS SCRUBBED FROM APOLLO 8 MOON TRIP 45TH ANNIVERSARY DOCUMENTARY




NASA | Earthrise: The 45th Anniversary 

December 24, 1968

Revisionist History Minus Scripture Quotes 

From Genesis

Obama's NASA Ignores God's Creation: Apollo 8 1968

EXCERPTS:
"On Christmas Eve in 1968, all three astronauts aboard America's Apollo 8 spacecraft broadcast to the world the biblical account of God's creation of the earth by reading from Genesis.  Just hours earlier, God provided these men a glimpse of the earth never before witnessed by mankind. This week, NASA released a brief documentary video of "Earthrise" on this 45th anniversary of the event -- absent God and the Bible."

From the:

Apollo 8, the first manned mission to the Moon, entered lunar orbit on Christmas Eve, December 24, 1968. That evening, the astronauts; Commander Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot Jim Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot William Anders did a live television broadcast from lunar orbit, in which they showed pictures of the Earth and Moon seen from Apollo 8. Lovell said, "The vast loneliness is awe-inspiring and it makes you realize just what you have back there on Earth." They ended the broadcast with the crew taking turns reading from the book of Genesis.

William Anders:

"For all the people on Earth the crew of Apollo 8 has a message we would like to send you".

"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness."
Jim Lovell:
"And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day."
 Frank Borman:
"And God said, Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good."
Borman then added, "And from the crew of Apollo 8, we close with good night, good luck, a Merry Christmas, and God bless all of you - all of you on the good Earth."

SEE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/17252-apollo-8-astronaut-recalls-historic-scripture-reading-from-space


SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/17252-aposEEllo-8-astronaut-recalls-historic-scripture-reading-from-spacThe GOOD Earth - 

Apollo 8 Christmas Eve Message,

WITH SCRIPTURE AS IT REALLY HAPPENED: