Translate

Sunday, October 6, 2013

BILL GATES: "POWERFUL NEW MARKET" IN COMMON CORE TO SELL HIS SOFTWARE TO A "UNIFORM BASE OF CUSTOMERS"

GLENN BECK PLAYS CLIPS OF BILL GATES 
PROMOTING COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY:
PIGEON-HOLING YOUR CHILDREN INTO A 
STATE DEFINED CAREER TRACK



CLICK ON THIS IMAGE TO ENLARGE:
BILL GATES: HIS PLAN FOR A 
"GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE BRACELET"
FOR YOUR CHILDREN IN SCHOOL
GSR BRACELET




REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OPPOSES COMMON CORE

APRIL, 2013

RESOLUTION CONCERNING COMMON CORE EDUCATION STANDARDS
WHEREAS, the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are a set of academic standards, promoted and supported by two private membership organizations, the National Governor’s Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) as a method for conforming American students to uniform (“one size fits all”) achievement goals to make them more competitive in a global marketplace, (1.) and
WHEREAS, the NGA and the CCSSO, received tens of millions of dollars from private third parties to advocate for and develop the CCSS strategy, subsequently created the CCSS through a process that was not subject to any freedom of information acts or other sunshine laws, and never piloted the CCSS, and
WHEREAS, even though Federal Law prohibits the federalizing of curriculum (2.), the Obama Administration accepted the CCSS plan and used 2009 Stimulus Bill money to reward the states that were most committed to the president’s CCSS agenda; but, they failed to give states, their legislatures and their citizens time to evaluate the CCSS before having to commit to them, and
WHEREAS, the NGA and CCSSO in concert with the same corporations developing the CCSS ‘assessments’ have created new textbooks, digital media and other teaching materials aligned to the standards which must be purchased and adopted by local school districts in order that students may effectively compete on CCSS ‘assessments’, and
WHEREAS, the CCSS program includes federally funded testing and the collection and sharing of massive amounts of personal student and teacher data, and
WHEREAS, the CCSS effectively removes educational choice and competition since all schools and all districts must use Common Core ‘assessments’ based on the Common Core standards to allow all students to advance in the school system and to advance to higher education pursuits; therefore be it
RESOLVED, the Republican National Committee, as stated in the 2012 Republican Party Platform, “do not believe in a one size fits all approach to education and support providing broad education choices to parents and children at the State and local level,” (p35)(3.), which is best based on a free market approach to education for students to achieve individual excellence; and, be it further
RESOLVED, the Republican National Committee recognizes the CCSS for what it is– an inappropriate overreach to standardize and control the education of our children so they will conform to a preconceived “normal,” and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the Republican National Committee rejects the collection of personal student data for any non-educational purpose without the prior written consent of an adult student or a child student’s parent and that it rejects the sharing of such personal data, without the prior written consent of an adult student or a child student’s parent, with any person or entity other than schools or education agencies within the state, and be it finally
RESOLVED, the 2012 Republican Party Platform specifically states the need to repeal the numerous federal regulations which interfere with State and local control of public schools, (p36) (3.); and therefore, the Republican National Committee rejects this CCSS plan which creates and fits the country with a nationwide straitjacket on academic freedom and achievement.
References:
2.  Federal Law 20 USC 1232a-Sec. 1232a. and The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Pub.L. 89-10, 79 Stat. 27, 20 US.C. ch. 70.

Saturday, October 5, 2013

GOVERNOR MARKELL OF DELAWARE MOCKS CRITICISM OF COMMON CORE AS "MYTHOLOGY"

GOVERNOR MARKELL OF DELAWARE
DEEPLY INVOLVED IN COMMON CORE
DENIES FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF EDUCATION
COVERS UP SOCIALIST AIMS
"HIGHER STANDARDS" THAT ARE REALLY LOWER

Governor's Jack Markell's Weekly Message 

September 6, 2013

Misleads Public with Erroneous Claims 
About Common Core
Published on Sep 6, 2013 on YouTube:
In his weekly message, filmed at Silver Lake Elementary School in Middletown, Governor Markell discusses the Common Core State Standards and their impact on student achievement in Delaware. 
"This is a bipartisan effort, driven by states across the country, to raise the bar for our students without interference from federal mandates," said Governor Markell. "It emphasizes the ability of our next generation of workers -- your kids, our kids -- to apply lessons learned in the classroom to real-world situations."

                                     

MARKELL CLAIMS: "THIS IS NOT ABOUT A NATIONAL CURRICULUM" (WHEN IT IS!)




  • FROM STATE OF DELAWARE WEBSITE: 
"The Governor made education one of his top priorities. As a result, Delaware won President Obama's Race to the Top competition to significantly improve public schools. Delaware’s plan was ranked first of 40 state plans by the U.S. Department of Education and was one of just two plans to receive initial funding.
Governor Markell has also worked to advocate on behalf of Delawareans and bring national attention to his home state through a number of leadership roles including his recent role (2012-2013) as Chair of the National Governors Association (NGA). His Chair’s initiative was A Better Bottom Line: Employing People with Disabilities. The Governor is:
  • Chairman of the National Board of Directors for Jobs for America's Graduates (JAG)
  • National Governors Association (NGA) Executive Committee Member
  • Former Chair, National Governors Association
  • Former Co-Chair of the Common Core Standards Initiative, a joint effort of NGA and the Council of Chief State School Officers to develop Common Core Standards for education
  • Former Board Member, National Assessment Governing Board, nominated by US Education Secretary, Arne Duncan
  • Former Chair of the Democratic Governors Association (DGA)
  • Former Chair of the Education, Early Childhood and Workforce Committee, NGA (July 2010 - Dec 2010)
  • Former Vice Chair of the NGA Economic Development and Commerce Committee (Jan 2010 - July 2010)"

MARKELL MOCKS COMMON CORE DOUBTERS AS MYTHOLOGIZERS

























































Markell tells MSNBC about criticism of Common Core:
“No, because it’s not based in fact,” Markell responded. “It’s based on this mythology.”
Markell's Washington Post op-ed article filled with an "abundance of inaccuracies and lies by omission" about Common Core as described in: 
Markell's Washington Post article reprinted in full here, as seen originally at:

Back to previous page

The tea party is wrong on the Common Core curriculum

By Jack Markell, Published: June 9

Jack Markell, the governor of Delaware, co-chaired the Common Core Standards Initiative.
Over the past three years, 45 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards. These objectives were developed to ensure that America’s students acquire the academic skills they need to reach their full potential.
Yet the Common Core standards are under serious assault by the tea party movement, which argues that they were developed by the federal government [“A new battle for tea party,” front page, May 31]. This assertion lacks any basis in fact. The Common Core was developed during a year-long process by state leaders — Democrats and Republicans — along with highly respected members of the business community and people in education, including many teachers.
Rather than representing a takeover by the federal government, Common Core shows why states have always led in the area of education policy. State leaders realized that we can best accomplish our goals by working together with common guidelines that allow us to raise the bar for our students and share resources without interference from federal mandates.
Opponents of higher standards also argue that the Common Core will eliminate local control of a school’s curriculum. This, too, is simply not true. Previously, each state had set its own standards; now, the majority of states will have the same ones. Local school boards have had, and will continue to have, discretion in how to work with their schools and educators to teach those higher objectives — from the texts they use to the teaching techniques they employ. The difference is that the expectations for a high school junior in Delaware will be the same as in California.
If the crusaders against Common Core don’t think this is important, they should speak with military families. Their stories — told to support groups and educators — illuminate the benefits of having expectations for students that don’t vary by Zip code and that prepare their children for a global economy. They talk about moving to a new state with better academic standards, and how their kids initially struggle to meet more challenging goals but ultimately flourish beyond the levels that their previous accomplishments would have suggested.
Luckily, though opponents’ voices are loud, they are not the majority. The Common Core effort represents one of the few initiatives so fundamental to the prosperity of our country that it has received support from organizations as diverse as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, teachers unions, the National Parent Teacher Association and the U.S. Army.
Supporters of the standards recognize that we are in a global war for jobs, best characterized as a global war for talent. According to Gallup, 3 billion people are looking for jobs in a world that has only 1.2 billion good jobs to offer. To compete and win on the global stage, our country’s leaders must demand more of ourselves and do our students the favor of demanding more of them. That means an education that doesn’t just produce diplomas but also gives our students the tools they need to compete with their counterparts around the world for college admission and careers.
The Common Core initiative is driven by the highest international bench marks as well as a thorough, evidence-based study of the skills required for students to attain college and career readiness by the time they don their high school graduation gowns. We have maintained an intense focus on the ability of our next generation of workers to apply lessons learned in the classroom to real-world situations. In today’s economy, these skill sets are not controversial. They include “writing arguments to support claims,” “using probability to evaluate the outcomes of decisions,” “participating effectively in a range of collaborative discussions” and “making sense of math problems and persevering in solving them.” The Common Core standards will ensure that students gain these necessary skills.
It’s time to focus on the difficult work that comes with effectively implementing higher standards across hundreds of thousands of classrooms. We cannot let fringe movements distract us from this goal, and we cannot let this moment pass. All of us who believe in the Common Core must vocally and visibly debunk the myths — and fight for a future that gives all of our nation’s children the best chance to succeed.
Read more on this topic: Michael Gerson: GOP fear of Common Core education standards unfounded Katrina vanden Heuvel: Stakes on standardized testing are too high Deborah Kenny: The right curriculum for kindergarten is play Joshua P. Starr: Schools need a timeout on standardized tests Valerie Strauss: Five key questions about the Common Core standards Alexandra Petri: Does the Common Core mean the end of reading?
_________________________________________________________

MANNY SILVA: BEWARE OF JAKES, OSTEEN, MEYER

Beware Of: Jakes, Osteen, and Meyer

What if a Bible teacher:  teaches that there are many paths to God; does not know whether Muslims will go to heaven or not; and does not believe in the proper biblical teaching of the Trinity
​,  but instead teaches that the Trinity is "God manifesting Himself in three different ways, or "modes."​
What if a Bible teacher:  refuses to answer whether homosexuality is sinful; refuses to say whether homosexuals will not go to heaven; and cannot say for sure who goes to heaven or not, even atheists;  and teaches that “following your dreams” is what will make your life happy.
What if a Bible teacher: teaches that Jesus was tormented in hell by demons; believes he/she believes they do not sin anymore; and that you cannot be saved unless you believe that Jesus went to hell.
Would you accept any of these teachers as legitimate Bible teachers?  Would you use their books as good resources, knowing that they teach these things?  Are these teachings or beliefs okay with you, or are they demonic?  Would you warn your friends about them?  If not, why should you not warn your Christian friends about them?  Is it wrong to call out these teachers and expose them if they are preaching false doctrines?
I have been concerned recently about some friends who have been reading books by so​me of these teachers, and quoting them, and apparently accepting the false idea that these are good Bible teachers.  They are not, and so I give you a brief summary of just some of their false teachings and why you should stay away from them.  Instead you should have no fellowship in any way with them, and you ought to be getting more into the word of Go
​d ​
than into their "inspirational, feel good teachings"​
 ​. ​
Here is the summary of three false teachers: Joel Osteen, TD Jakes, and Joyce Meyer. 
​All three also share the same kind of prosperity gospel or word-faith teachings that are heretical as well.  ​

Please also go to the suggested video links for detailed shocking exposes​
​of their ministries.​
 
Inline image 3
For further References:

​TD Jakes and his corrupt conferences with secular artists:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KmRSqHiFfA

Joel Osteen's Lies:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG5hmZctmZw

Joyce Meyer and her greed:​
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ko5zkkZ0GmQ#t=730
Manny Silva
Stand For Truth Ministries

JUDGE JEANINE PIRRO: WHO'S THE REAL TERRORIST? US OR OBAMA?


WORLD WAR 2 VETERANS CROSS OBAMA'S BARRICADES IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

WWII memorial barricades moved for vets:





Friday, October 4, 2013

COMMON CORE CONFRONTED BY LINDSEY BURKE & PANEL

Resource Bank 2013: 

Confronting the Common Core: Strategic Discussion

Obama Administration & Federal Involvement 
From Start
Common Core Violates Federal Laws
Filled With Curriculum Downgrades
"Fuzzy Math"

Published on May 9, 2013 on YouTube Channel of the Heritage Foundation:

Panel discussion about Common Core at the 2013 Resource Bank conference with:
Lindsey Burke, The Heritage Foundation

Christel Swasey, Utahns Against Common Core
Heather Crossin, Ohioans Against Common Core
Ted Rebarber, AccountabilityWorks
Jim Stergios, Pioneer Institute

COMMON CORE'S MARXIST ROOTS: JOHN DEWEY'S "PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITARIAN EDUCATION"






Thursday, October 3, 2013

OBAMACARE EMPLOYING PLANNED PARENTHOOD & SEEDCO AS NAVIGATORS~YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION EXPOSED TO UNSCREENED WORKERS

Michelle Malkin of The National Review Online reports in
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/360151/seedco-obamacares-fraud-stained-navigators-michelle-malkin, about:
"Seedco: Obamacare's Fraud-Stained Navigators"
Excerpt:
"U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius controls a $54 million slush fund to hire thousands of “navigators,” “in-person assisters,” and counselors, who are now propagandizing and recruiting Obamacare recipients into the government-run exchanges. As I warned in May, the nanny-state navigator corps is a serious threat to Americans’ privacy. Background checks and training requirements are minimal to nonexistent. A history of fraud is no barrier to entry."
"They’ll have access to potential enrollees’ income levels, birthdates, addresses, eligibility for government assistance, Social Security numbers, and intensely personal medical information."
________________________________________________________
From Live Action & Lila Rose at http://www.liveaction.org/:
Dear Friend,

If you're getting this, you must know what a threat ObamaCare is to the American people.

But you may know people who still think the health care law is a good one. After all, the bill is thousands of pages long; not even the politicians who passed it have read it. So it's easy for non-political junkies to hear "health care reform" and figure, "It must be good for me, right?"

ObamaCare may be deliberately complicated, but the facts are out there. Here are four that you can use to get the truth out about this dangerous law.

1. Employers must fund abortion drugs.ObamaCare requires virtually every employer to provide coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing drugs and devices. The ridiculously narrow and capricious conscience exemptions to this rule tend not to include entities like Bible publishers, Christian business owners, and the Little Sisters of the Poor (!).

Individuals and businesses across the country are suing the Obama administration to protect their conscience rights. But if the administration has its way, you will fund abortions should you choose your employer's ObamaCare health plan.

2. The special abortion fund. Any insurance plan that includes elective abortions requires a separate fee that goes directly to funding them. But this "surcharge" is very difficult to discover: it can be described to the prospective customer only during enrollment, and the company advertising the plan does not have to disclose the amount of the surcharge, or even its existence.

Even if you get a non-employer ObamaCare plan, the system is designed to make it very hard to tell if you're funding abortions with it. Click this link to see if your state has made an effort to prevent your tax dollars from directly funding abortions.

3. ObamaCare makes Planned Parenthood the boss. Among the "navigators," who are given gobs of government money to usher people into the ObamaCare health insurance exchanges, is abortion giant Planned Parenthood. As of September of this year, the abortion corporation, whose forced taxpayer funding skyrocketed in 2011 to $542 million (that's 45% of its budget!), received an additional $655,000 to peddle ObamaCare.

(They're also getting access to your medical and tax information. Even employees with previous criminal convictions – like for identity theft – will have your Social Security number on hand.)

Live Action has shown that Planned Parenthood lies to and manipulates women to get what it wants. And Planned Parenthood has a huge financial stake in ObamaCare. So where do you think this abortion corporation will "navigate" prospective customers? That's right: to a plan that covers abortion.

4. Death panels. A board of unelected bureaucrats will set "quality" and "efficiency" measures, and doctors who don't comply will be banned from contracting with any health insurance plan. These board members are appointed, not elected, and Congress has barely any power at all to contest their life-or-death decisions.

The Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) gets to decide whether it's "cost-effective" for your doctor to treat you. If it's not, then you're out of luck...even if you're willing and able to pay. This is a death panel.

Not only is ObamaCare a deadly threat to the unborn, but it purports to let far-off bureaucrats make – and enforce – life-and-death decisions for all of us.

So now you have the facts. But it's not enough just to know. Join us in spreading this information to everyone you know, so we can keep this law from becoming a nightmarish reality.

Please forward this to ten friends. Invite them to click the links and do their own research. They may not agree with you right away...but at least you'll get them thinking.

Every one of us needs to step up and get the truth out there. Let's stop paying the federal government to kill our babies. And let's stop paying America's largest abortion corporation to do their PR.

Yours in the fight for life,

Drew Belsky
Communications Director
Live Action