Translate

Friday, October 31, 2014

BAPTISTS ISSUE RESOLUTION CENSORING HOUSTON'S LESBIAN MAYOR PARKER~PASTOR DIXON'S STATEMENT ON ROMANS 13

BAPTISTS ISSUE RESOLUTION CENSORING 
HOUSTON'S LESBIAN MAYOR PARKER
"RESOLUTION ON THE HOUSTON PASTORS' SUBPOENAS":
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/resolution-houston-pastors-subpoenas/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
"30th Anniversary of the Unregistered Baptist Fellowship
Meeting at Victory Baptist Church, Paducah, KY, Oct. 20-22, 2014:
Whereas, the City of Houston, Texas has elected its first openly Sodomite (lesbian) Mayor, Annise Parker, and;
Whereas, the City Council of Houston passed a so-called Equal Rights ordinance that is destructive of the rights of others, as when it permits, encourages and helps so-called “transgender” people to claim discrimination if they are banned from restrooms, and;
Whereas, opponents sought through petition to introduce a ballot referendum on this perverse ordinance, and;
Whereas, City Attorneys responded by issuing a tyrannical, unprecedented demand that key pastors turn over their sermons, and other communications related to homosexuality and/or the immorality of the perverse, unjust ordinance, and;
Whereas, this demand of the pastors is an attack on the religious liberty and freedom of speech for which our Baptist forefathers suffered in order to teach and bring to our nation, before and during its birth, and;
Whereas, these liberties are not only God-given, Biblical and Natural Law rights, but are also codified by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as in the Texas Constitution;
Therefore, Be it Resolved that the City of Houston not only withdraw, but publically repudiate, this demand as unlawful, and issue an apology to the pastors of Houston;
Be it Further Resolved that the City of Houston repeal and repudiate its so-called Equal Rights ordinance, since the Bible and natural law teaches that homosexuality is a behavioral choice, and therefore a wicked sin, as much as adultery, stealing, murder, etc. (1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Romans 1:26-28).
Be it Further Resolved that the pastors of Houston examine their relationship with the state and make sure it conforms to the Biblical pattern, so that First Amendment rights are not complied by incorporation, 501(c) (3) tax exemption, and that the light of God’s countenance may be fully upon them.
Therefore, the Unregistered Baptist Fellowship, in the name of the God of the Bible (KJV), hereby rebukes Mayor Annise Parker, and the officials of Houston who have joined with her, in this unjust assault upon religious liberty and freedom of speech; and we stand with these pastors who are trying to check the wicked homosexual agenda in their city.
Pastor Greg A. Dixon, representing the pastors of the UBF, will be on location at the Houston, “I STAND SUNDAY meeting, Nov. 2.
Pastor Dixon was the pastor of the Indianapolis Baptist Temple when the IRS revoked the tax exempt status of the church in the spring of 1995 for the sermon content that emanated from the church including the subject of sodomy and other “federal policy” issues."
__________________________________________________________
Revisiting Romans 13
SEE: 

Thursday, October 30, 2014

LAWLESSNESS, POLICE & CHURCH ABUSE ARE SYMPTOMS OF A DISEASE CALLED GODLESS OBAMA COLLECTIVISM~EBOLA IS THE JUDGMENT OF GOD

A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES



Obama Laughs & Says:

"You Can Only Vote Once, This isn’t Chicago";

Issues Marching Orders to Thugs 
to Fraudulently Vote More Than Once; 
Militarized Police Disregard Laws & Civil Rights 
With Impunity Guaranteed by Obama;
Churches Adopting Similar Heavy Handed Authoritarian Approach to Gain Government Approval
Published on Oct 29, 2014
The pro-amnesty Hispanic activist organization the National Council of La Raza helpfully promoted a Washington Post article explaining which states people can vote in without having to use a photo ID.
“Voter ID laws are at-issue across the country, with newly Republican-controlled legislatures having passed them in numerous states after the 2010 election,” explained The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake. “Most states still request some form of ID, but don’t require it. Another 20 states don’t require identification.

Massive Non-Citizen Voting Uncovered in Maryland:

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
"An election integrity watchdog group is suing the state of Maryland, alleging that it has discovered massive and ongoing fraudulent voting by non-U.S. citizens in one county. But because of the way that the non-citizens are able to cast votes in elections, the fraud is likely happening in every single county and subdivision across the state. The group believes that the illegal voting has been happening for years.
The group, Virginia Voters Alliance, says that it compared how voters in Frederick County filled out jury duty statements compared with their voting records. The group’s investigation found that thousands of people in Frederick County who stated that they are not U.S. citizens on jury duty forms went on to cast votes in elections. Either they failed to tell the truth when they were summoned for jury duty, or they cast illegal votes. Both are crimes. The same group previously found that about 40,000 people are registered to vote in both Virginia and Maryland.
It is a federal crime to cast votes if you are not legally eligible to vote. Non-citizens, whether in the country legally or not, are prohibited from voting in most local and all state and federal elections. Yet the VVA investigation found that hundreds of non-citizens have been voting in Frederick County, Maryland. One in seven Maryland residents are non-U.S. citizens.
“The lawsuit is the equivalent of the lookout spotting the iceberg ahead of the Titanic,” state Del. Pat McDonough told the Tatler. He added that the group’s investigation found a voter fraud “smoking gun.”
Maryland state law makes it easier for non-citizens, both those present legally and those in the country against the law, to vote. Maryland issues drivers licenses to legal and illegal aliens. Driver’s licenses in turn make it easier under the Motor Voter law to register to vote. Maryland also offers copious taxpayer-funded social programs to non-citizens in the state.
The group filed suit in Baltimore’s U.S. District Court on Friday. They are suing the Frederick County Board of Elections and the Maryland State Board of Elections.
Del. Pat McDonough (R-Baltimore and Harford Counties) detailed the alleged fraud in a Maryland press conference today. He is calling for a special state prosecutor because the fraud may be taking place statewide, with significant impact on Maryland elections. Maryland currently holds 10 electoral votes in presidential elections. McDonough is also proposing legislation including voter ID to close the loopholes that he says non-citizens are using to cast votes.
In a statement, Del. McDonough says:
There are frequent allegations in America and Maryland about the existence of voter fraud. In the case I am presenting today, there is documentation and a track record. The numbers and facts from the records in Frederick County are the tip of the iceberg. When these numbers are multiplied by including the other subdivisions in Maryland, the potential number is alarming and could change the outcome of a close statewide election.
Even more dangerous is the probability of many local elections that are decided by a few votes could be affected. All 188 members of the Maryland General Assembly are standing for re-election as well as many local office holders.
The important election that we have coming up demands that citizens’ votes are not diluted or cancelled by non-citizens who are not legally permitted to vote. The sanctity of the ballot box, because of the flawed system we are pointing out, has already been violated in previous elections.
The purpose of the lawsuit is to mandate those responsible for the administration of the election process will remove the non-citizens from the final voting count.
The purpose of the investigation by the special prosecutor is to penetrate more deeply statewide and determine why this fraud or any other related violation was allowed to occur.
The purpose of the legislation is to plug the massive loophole in current law which permitted these fraudulent practices to take place.
Maryland is a Democratic stronghold especially around its larger cities, but the governor’s race there is tightening as Republican Larry Hogan gains ground. Illegal votes could tip the balance if the legal vote is close enough on election day. “What if Hogan loses by 500 votes or 1000 votes?” McDonough asked.
Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley is expected to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2016. Del. McDonough noted that the fraud uncovered by VVA occurred on O’Malley’s watch."
__________________________________________________________________
CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY POLICE:

New York City Subway Musician Arrested For Playing Protest Song Legally:



Published on Oct 29, 2014

Musician Andrew Kalleen http://www.lawrenceandleigh.com was arrested in early October for singing in a NY subway even though the written code states he is allowed to do so. The officer even reads the code out loud to everyone on scene yet he still proceeds to harass the musician and then arrests him along with a couple of other officers. The silver lining to this is Andrew kept his cool, he did not fight back and everything was caught on camera by a passerby so he has a good case for a first amendment lawsuit. Other topics covered are ticket quotas, warrant roundups, and out of control police state.

BUSKER’S UNLAWFUL ARREST PROMPTS PROTESTS ON NY SUBWAY -http://www.infowars.com/video-buskers...



Cops Ignore Laws to Issue Unconstitutional Arrests:


HIGHLIGHTS: SUBWAY PERFORMERS CHALLENGE 

NEW YORK CITY POLICE UNLAWFUL ARRESTS:




Published on Oct 21, 2014

Subway performers gathered at the mezzanine floor of the Metropolitan Avenue subway station to protest the unwarranted arrests made by NYPD officers. Andrew Kalleen, the man of the moment, was arrested on October 17 at the same station while performing. Kalleen used the occasion to lodge a CCRB with the local NYPD office.



Tuesday, October 28, 2014

FREEDOM OR TYRANNY: YOU DECIDE THIS ELECTION TO "BREAK EVERY CHAIN" WHETHER IMPOSED BY THE STATE CHURCH OR GOVERNMENT


DOES YOUR "FEEL GOOD" PASTOR TAKE HIS CUES FROM BARACK "THE WIZARD" AND THINK HE CAN BUILD THE KINGDOM OF GOD IN THE LOCAL COMMUNITY?
ROMANS 13: CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO EVIL RULERS 
IN CHURCH OR STATE IS OBEDIENCE TO GOD
A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC UNDER GOD
OR A BORDERLESS, TYRANNICAL DICTATORSHIP RULING SLAVES?
THE STATUE OF LIBERTY: BROKEN SHACKLES & CHAINS

OBAMA'S LAND OF OZ:



DON'T VOTE FOR ANDY STANLEY'S "PASTOR IN CHIEF" OR HIS BOARD OF ELDERS:


NEW FILM: "THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE UTOPIA"

TRAILER:
Utopia Film HD-Exposing Socialist Collectivism;
DON'T BE A MUNCHKIN MAN!!!
DON'T VOTE FOR THE UTOPIAN WIZARD OF OZ; 
HE WILL CHAIN YOU IN PRISON;
AND SO WILL HIS ENABLERS IN THE RANKS,
INSIDE & OUTSIDE THE STATE CHURCH:
"PROGRESSIVES: THE NEW GODS":


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

"I had a great time up on ol’ Rocky Top for the Alabama-Tennessee game, but it is time to get back to being the sentinel — and in one week it will be our “Time for Choosing.”
Today is the 50th anniversary of the seminal conservative ideology speech given by Ronald Reagan — October 27th, 1964. Reagan’s speech laid out a clear vision for an America that embraced its history as a Constitutional Republic and the intricate relationship between government and the governed. Reagan’s speech seems prescient now — it is certainly quite telling of who we are as Americans.
I sincerely ask that you please watch this speech — no teleprompter, no fake Greek columns — just one man’s insightful thoughts and perspectives.
"A TIME FOR CHOOSING" BY RONALD REAGAN, OCTOBER 27, 1964
50 YEARS AGO
And after watching Reagan deliver this speech, ask yourself, are his words still relevant? As The Washington Post writes, “The Reagan whom Americans saw on the night of Oct. 27, 1964, was not the avuncular, optimistic Reagan of his film roles, or of his subsequent political career that emphasized “morning in America” and the “shining city on a hill,” but a comparatively angry and serious Reagan, serving up partisan red meat against liberalism and the Democrats.”
“Our natural, unalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government,” he declared, “and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment.” The speech couldn’t save Goldwater. And his landslide defeat by President Lyndon Johnson was thought at the time to represent a sweeping repudiation of conservatism. Yet “A Time for Choosing” created a groundswell of support for Reagan’s own entry into electoral politics two years later. It also provided a template — an understanding of government as ruinously ambitious and out of control, projecting weakness and uncertainty to our enemies abroad — that still defines conservatism today.”
Some try to say conservatism is about punishing the people — quite the opposite — conservatism is about elevating the individual and with a structure governance that promotes their growth, opportunity, and promise. Conservatism is inherently “compassionate” and needs no one to try and qualify it — just embrace its fundamental principles: limited government, fiscal responsibility, individual sovereignty, free market/free enterprise economy, and strong national defense.
I just have to ask, who would not agree with those precepts?
Um, well, the folks who bring you “you didn’t build that” and “corporations and businesses don’t create jobs” — the progressive socialists. They reject the preeminence of the individual for the manipulation and subjugation of the collective. Conservatives believe there must be a safety net for citizens as they climb the ladder of personal success and achievement — but as Reagan believed, we want you to continue to climb.
Instead, progressive socialists prefer to provide a hammock, as they do not advocate for the advancement of the indomitable individual entrepreneurial spirit — they just promote sound bite gimmicks that result in economic enslavement.
Progressive socialists believe they can and must determine individual outcomes because they believe individuals have no right to do that themselves. Conservatism believes in those three rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We don’t guarantee happiness, but we create an environment where it can pursued and achieved.
As my mom would say, “Self-esteem comes from doing esteemable things” — conservatives want individual self-esteem — progressive socialists prefer to destroy individual will and determination in order to establish dependency.
Ronald Reagan’s “Time for Choosing” speech is far more than just relevant for today — it is crucially necessary. If we don’t draw the complete distinction between what Reagan addressed and that which Obama professed then the growth, opportunity, and promise for future generations of Americans will be lost.
Sadly for America, not enough people watched this speech when the time for choosing came in 2008 and 2012 — they preferred the teleprompter aural honey that dripped into their ears which was simply disguised poison that found its way into their cognitive reasoning.
But perhaps, just perhaps, today there will be enough Americans who will take the time to view this video and share it with others. In a week there will be another “Time for Choosing” — let it not pass without our nation making the right choice — for life, liberty, freedom, and government enabling the individual pursuit of happiness — and not the false promise of a tyrannical government guaranteeing a collective happiness.
Reagan’s message was prescient. We don’t need someone who tries to be a lesser version of a progressive socialist, we need someone who can reignite that fire.
But until then, we have this time to choose."
____________________________________________________________________________
COMPARE THIS TO THE SOCIALIST/GLOBALIST MINDSET 
OF OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON:
Hillary Clinton: Businesses Don’t Create Jobs:

Obama: If You've Got A Business, You Didn't Build That:





Monday, October 27, 2014

CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN AMERICA WHILE COMPROMISED STATE CHURCHES REMAIN SILENT~PARALLELS HITLER PERIOD

SEE VIDEOS OF ANITA FUENTES, EVANGELIST, THAT YOUTUBE IS PREVENTING 

FROM BEING UPLOADED:

Christian Persecution in America & The Compromising Church

AND:

Christian Hatred Increases in America - Here's Proof:


Published on Oct 21, 2014
Please forward, A need to know broadcast!
***** If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me. John 15:18-27
----------------------------------------­-----------------------
Evangelist Anita Fuentes Website: http://www.emoaf.org/ 



MANDATORY EBOLA QUARANTINE AT "GOVERNMENT SUPERVISED FACILITIES"~BUT WHERE ARE THEY?

Mandatory Quarantine Facilities Activated in New York for those flying from Africa:

New York, New Jersey Provoke Criticism With Ebola Quarantine

EXCERPTS:
"On Friday, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a mandatory 21-day Ebola quarantine on doctors and nurses returning from treating Ebola patients in West Africa. But by Sunday, after the White House had harshly criticized the plan, Cuomo loosened those restrictions.
The announcement of the quarantine last week by both Governor Cuomo and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie came one day after a New York City doctor, Craig Spencer from Doctors Without Borders, was diagnosed with the Ebola virus.
Further criticism followed when Maine nurse Kaci Hickox, returning from Sierra Leone, publicly complained about her mandatory quarantine under New Jersey’s policy, stating that she felt “like a criminal.”
According to Doctors Without Borders, Hickox has been treated poorly, and she claims that the isolation tent in which she spent the weekend outside of Newark’s University Hospital was unheated and that she was dressed in uncomfortable scrubs. 
Hickox has reportedly hired Norman Siegel, a civil rights attorney who specializes in cases involving the government, to challenge the New Jersey policy."

Judge Jeanine Pirro - Opening Statement - 

Obama and CDC Fail on Ebola Containment: