Translate

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

SODOMITE AGENDA DEADLY TO OUR NATURAL RIGHTS~ROMANS 13 OBEDIENCE TO GAY RIGHTS LAWS?~DID YOU FORGET ROMANS 1-3?

October 21, 2014
Homosexual movement is deadly to our natural rights
FROM: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/miller/141021; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Gina Miller
Listen to an audio version of this column
At this point, only the most deceived or grossly uninformed among us do not realize that a devilish enemy regime has taken over our nation. Under Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) we have seen unprecedented lawlessness from the executive branch of the federal government. The laundry list of Obama and company's malfeasance and arguably impeachable offenses continues to grow.

Perhaps the most diabolical advancement of Obama's tyrannical, anti-American agenda is in the area of the radical homosexual movement. From militant homosexual activists, we have seen a full-frontal assault on the rights of Christians and others who oppose the campaign to force on America the acceptance of special "rights" for sexual deviants and the destruction of the definition of marriage. We have seen Obama load his administration with open homosexuals. He has appointed them to federal courts. He has overseen the repeal of the prohibition on homosexuals openly serving in our military. He has used his Justice Department to ignore federal law that correctly defined marriage.

Under Obama, the activists in the radical homosexual movement have become emboldened, drunk on their metastasizing power to crush the rights of the right-thinking people of America. Examples of legal assaults against Christian business owners are piling up faster than ever before, and the most brazen to date occurred last week against pastors in Houston, Texas. The story has been everywhere, as is the outrage of the American people, that city attorneys under the in-your-face homosexual Democrat Mayor of Houston, Annise Parker, demanded that local pastors turn over their sermons that relate to the detestable "Bathroom Bill" shoved down the throats of the city's residents. In part, it allows men to use women's restrooms and other private, sex-segregated facilities. This move by the City of Houston is a gross, illegal affront to the God-given, natural rights of Christians who live there.

Many of us have been warning for years now that the natural rights of American citizens who hold proper moral beliefs about sexuality and marriage cannot coexist with the evil homosexual movement. These two world views are diametrically opposed to each other, and one must give way to the other. For far too long, Christians have stood by silently, offering little to no resistance, as degenerates have commandeered our culture and institutions. At this point, the cancer of the sodomite movement is malignant and has deeply infected the places of power and influence in our nation – our schools, our "entertainment" industry, our businesses and corporations, and certainly our federal government. Our freedoms are in peril, and unless there is a massive push-back against the lawless federal judges who are imposing counterfeit marriage on the states and against the foot soldiers of the militant homosexual movement, we will lose our natural rights. In serious jeopardy are our rights of conscience and freedom to conduct our lives and businesses as we see fit, our freedom of speech, religion and assembly – all these will be subjugated to the new "rights" of sexual perverts if the American people do not rise up to stop this toxic movement.

In the upcoming issue of The New Yorker magazine, Jeffrey Toobin has a feature interview with Barack Obama. The piece largely focuses on Obama's flooding of the federal judiciary with his leftist minions. Toobin also notes Obama's satisfaction with the latest Supreme Court outrage in which the Court refused to hear several state challenges to lawless lower courts imposing same-sex "marriage" on those states. Toobin goes on to write:

Obama opposed marriage equality until May of 2012. He told me that he now believes the Constitution requires all states to allow same-sex marriage, an argument that his Administration has not yet made before the Supreme Court. "Ultimately, I think the Equal Protection Clause does guarantee same-sex marriage in all fifty states," he said.

This is sickeningly wrong, but this is what we're facing at the hands of these Godless tools of the devil, as Obama is. No longer will appeals to what's right, good and true be accepted by the degenerates who are ruling our nation. The fact that homosexual behavior is dangerously unhealthy, unnatural and immoral does not sway the members of this demonic movement. The fact that this perverse behavior was never meant to be protected by any law of the United States, including the "Equal Protection Clause," is meaningless to them. The fact that there is not, never has been and never will be such a thing as same-sex "marriage" matters not a whit to these people who are doing Satan's bidding in their zeal to outlaw Christianity. Yes, that is their goal, and they're well on their way to achieving it.

What we're seeing in Houston and around the nation, with lawsuits against Christian business owners who refuse to lend their work to support counterfeit "marriage," is just the beginning of the war on our freedoms being waged by the soldiers of Sodom West. It is more important than ever that Christians and other right-minded people resist this evil movement. Church leaders must not be afraid to speak boldly against the hellish assault on marriage and the rights of the American people. If we don't fight this movement, we will certainly lose our freedoms. Don't doubt it for a minute.
__________________________________________________________________

"The Sodomite Agenda" by Jason Cooley, Old Paths Baptist Church, Northfield, Minnesota:

SERMON BEGINS AFTER 20 MINUTE MARK:



Tuesday, October 21, 2014

TELL YOUR 501C3 INCORPORATED STATE-CHURCH: COME OUT OF BABYLON


“In the matter of changing religion, State favors 

are stronger than penalties.”

The Framers of America's Founding Documents relied heavily upon the writings of the political philosopher, 
Baron de Montesquieu. Typical of Montesquieu's brilliant insight, he once wrote that:
“A more certain way to attack religion is by favor, by the comforts of life, by the hope of wealth; not 
by what reminds one of it, but by what makes one forget it; not by what makes one indignant, but by 
what makes men lukewarm, when other passions act on our souls, and those which religion inspires 
are silent. In the matter of changing religion, State favorsare stronger than penalties.”
The Spirit of the Laws, Baron de Montesquieu (1748)
Acceptance of State favors has had disastrous consequences on the churches in America. The church has 
been effectively silenced (or as Rev. D. James Kennedy put it, "gagged"). Now the disastrous consequences 
are being felt by the entire nation.
SEE: http://hushmoney.org/
SEE ALSO:  

Concerning Unlimited Submission 

and Non-Resistance

 to the Higher Powers

with Some Reflections on the Resistance 

Made to King Charles I 

by: Rev. Jonathan Mayhew (preached January 30, 1750)



THE Human Reasoning BEHIND a church 

organizing under the 501c3 corporation:

EXCERPT:
So you see the human reasoning has set the church up with another head and another set of 
rules to govern by. Remember the warning that the Apostle Paul gave us: Colossians 2:8: 
“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, 
after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” Our churches must return to their 
Sovereign Head, the Lord Jesus Christ, and not be entangled with the state.
___________________________________________________________________

THE INFLUENCE OF TAX EXEMPT STATUS 

ON THE LOCAL CHURCH’S FINANCIAL STRUCTURE:

EXCERPT:
Baptist churches need to leave the corporate model and organize in a way that honors God. PASTOR 
WHETHER YOU WANT TO ADMIT IT OR NOT THE CORPORATE MODEL HAS CAUSED YOU TO LEAVE THE 
SIMPLICITY OF GIVING IN THE CHURCH AND CAUSED YOU TO EMBRACE A WORLDY MODEL THAT IS 
OUTSIDE OF SCRIPTURAL AUTHORITY.
The second great effect the corporate model has had on many churches is the lust for buildings and property. 
As we have seen, many corporate churches today have used their tax exempt partnership with the federal 
government to hold fundraisers. We see many churches today that have left the simple process of a meeting 
house and went to a huge almost cathedral like monstrosity of a building. The churches are strapped with 
debt and the pastor has a constant concern of how he will keep the corporation afloat. The Lord’s church should 
not be bogged down with debt.
As a sidenote, there are many churches out there today that have millions of dollars in property. That would 
not be possible if was not for their state property tax exempt status. The taxes alone on the properties that 
are worth millions of dollars would be enough to cripple the tax exempt church if the government every would 
withdraw their tax exempt status. State property tax exemption is not related to the federal 501c3 status, but, 
as does 501c3 status, the property tax exemption goes to motivation for acting contrary to God’s principles 
as laid down in his word.
State churches are therefore beholden to the civil government. To prove that, one needs only look at the paper 
work for tax exempt status.
_________________________________________________________________________
Come Out Of Babylon-The State Church:
SERMON STARTS AROUND THE 20 MINUTE MARK:
Churches That Are Shacked Up -Fornicating On The Lord:

501c3 makes your church a creature of the state:


501c3 CHURCH AND STATE LAW MINISTRIES-


SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE:




Does a Church have to be 501c3 to have a building?:





Christ Above All-Organize A Church without 501c3:





Monday, October 20, 2014

CHURCH MEMBERSHIP COVENANTS: UNBIBLICAL LEGALISTIC CONSCIENCE BINDING CONTRACTS~NOT FOR FREEDOM LOVING CHRISTIANS

THE DUMB SHEEP NEED HELP, AS YOU KNOW!
GNOSTICISM 2.0 IS BORN!
Lynn & Sarah Leslie of Crossroad, link below: "Oaths and covenants are a new form of legalism entering the church like a flood. They require more of us than Scripture requires. It is a horrible new form of bondage, accomplished in the name of a new church for the 21st century. This is a “transformation” not a “reformation.” It would return the church to the dark ages of oppressive State Church. This movement did not arise from God, but from the rapacious desires of evil men."
YOU MUST INSTALL THIS CRITICAL UPDATE OR FAIL!
ALSO KNOWN AS THE "SHEPHERDING MOVEMENT 2.0" 
SUBSTITUTING LEADERS FOR SHEPHERDS, 
BUT THESE ARE DEFINITELY NOT "SERVANT LEADERS";
ALL THE POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE AS THE FIRST

THE NEW BUSINESS MODEL OF DOING CHURCH MEMBERSHIP
SEE: The Shepherding Movement Comes of Age

 By Lynn and Sarah Leslie

January, 2004
EXCERPTS:
Dr. Robert Klenck, an orthopedic surgeon, has been speaking out at conferences around the country about the origination of this new covenant agenda. He explains that Rick Warren’s book, The Purpose-Driven Church, has sold over a million copies and that over 150,000 pastors and church leaders have been trained in his model. Rick Warren was mentored by Peter Drucker, a corporate management guru with strong ties to the New Age/New World Order. Drucker “influenced the start and growth of Saddleback Church.”
Drucker has dedicated much effort into bringing the church into conformance with the “systems” model of governance, which is known as Total Quality Management in the corporate world. In this model, parishioners are “customers.” The focus shifts to “outcomes” which means that people will have to be held “accountable” for “performance.” Certain rewards (“rights”) and “responsibilities” accompany these outcomes, and a small group structure like cell groups is a perfect way to ensure that people are meeting these “outcomes.” These “outcomes” or expectations are driven by people, not by the Lord or His Word. By implication, if one doesn’t meet the “outcomes,” there may be “penalties”.
Drucker is a communitarian, which is a modern “communist” who has effectually distanced their views from the old communists. In his communitarian model of governance, the State is in reality the only leg of the stool. The Corporate and the Church subsume their identities and comfortably merge with State into one comprehensive “system” of governance for mankind. Drucker’s ideas gave rise to the faith-based institution movement of the last decade.
It is not uncommon, therefore, to find that faith-based, government-financed “covenant” churches are requiring even more of their members. Members at one such church in Pennsylvania must participate in daily e-mails from the pastor, evening worship several nights a week, daily intercession activities, cell group activities, and up to 5 hours per week of “community service” in any of over a dozen state-funded, community-based “ministries.” Churches like this one have become “centers” for State charity work. They then become “accountable” to the “State” for the monies that they receive. When one signs an oath to uphold the covenant of this type of church, they are also agreeing to uphold the State/Church relationship!
The new oaths and covenants put a pressure on church people – a pressure that comes, not from God but from man. Peer orientation, fear factors, and the demands to conform or meet expectations prevail. The focus is on self-mastery, not God-directed discipline. Some will do the bare minimum just to “get by.” For others, good deeds that were formerly done in secret, arising out of love and compassion, are now done openly and boldly so that leaders will see and approve. 
Oaths and covenants are a new form of legalism entering the church like a flood. They require more of us than Scripture requires. It is a horrible new form of bondage, accomplished in the name of a new church for the 21st century. This is a “transformation” not a “reformation.” It would return the church to the dark ages of oppressive State Church. This movement did not arise from God, but from the rapacious desires of evil men. 


IS THERE A BIBLICAL MANDATE FOR 
CHURCH MEMBERSHIP COVENANT AGREEMENTS?

WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOUR PASTOR SPENT 5 WEEKS EXPLAINING THE NEED FOR YOU TO SIGN ONTO A "CONTRACTUAL" RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOU AND THE CHURCH LEADERSHIP?

HERE'S A CHURCH THAT IS ABOUT TO IMPLEMENT A SIX MONTH PLAN TO GET YOU TO DO THAT, WITH THE GULLIBLE SIGNING 
NO LESS THAN SIX (6) SEPARATE DOCUMENTS TO BIND YOUR CONSCIENCE, VIOLATING NOT ONLY SCRIPTURE, BUT ALSO REVISING CHURCH HISTORY:


THEY DIDN'T SIGN WRITTEN MEMBERSHIP COVENANTS 
AT PENTECOST
Matthew 20:25-28-"But Jesus called them to Himself and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant. And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave ---just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many."
Galatians 5: 1-6-"Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage. Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love." 
JUST LIKE MICROSOFT ANNOUNCING:
THE NEWEST, COOLEST, MOST ADVANCED OPERATING SYSTEM HAS JUST BEEN RELEASED; THE OLD OPERATING SYSTEM WILL NO LONGER BE SUPPORTED   
THOUGHT YOU HAD MEMBERSHIP IN PERPETUITY? WRONG!
HE WANTS TO BE YOUR LEADER, NOT YOUR SHEPHERD
BY ERASING YOUR OLD MEMBERSHIP AND STARTING OVER;
JUST BECAUSE HE AND THE BOARD THINK THEY ARE WISER THAN 
CHRISTIANS WHO CAME BEFORE THEM; THE BEST OPPORTUNITY TO
IMPROVE ON HOW TO BE A MEMBER SINCE PENTECOST!!!
SIGN NOW, THERE'S A PRICE INCREASE TOMORROW!!!
DON'T QUESTION, ACT NOW!!!
GEORGE W. TUTEN III, PASTOR OF:
LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, BEAR, DELAWARE WILL LOAD YOU WITH GUILT AND SHAME IF YOU DON'T SUBSCRIBE TO:
"'CHARTER' MEMBERSHIP 2.0" 
(CHARTER MEMBERSHIP 1.0 WAS 1993)



Membership Covenant Red Flags
EXCERPTS FROM FIRST ARTICLE ABOVE:
While crowds of protesters in the Middle East are clamoring for freedom from oppressive dictatorships, it appears that some Christians who live in the land of the free are being coerced into signing membership covenants based on a Moses Model of Old Covenant “rule”.
Perhaps without realizing it, these brothers and sisters in Christ are renouncing Paul’s teaching to the Galatians and reverting to Old Testament law, which we believe is being imposed on them by their church leadership. This is a hybrid form of Christianity that the Apostle Paul warned against. 
RED FLAG #1 – Faulty Theology Regarding the Bride of Christ
RED FLAG #2 – Elder / Parental Authority
RED FLAG #3 – Mandatory Small Group Participation
RED FLAG #4 – Non-members Must Submit to Elder Authority and Discipline
RED FLAG #5 – Disenrollment and Leaving
As our loyal readers know, Derek Prince and Bob Mumford publicly apologized for the abusive practices of the Shepherding Movement. Sadly, another generation has arisen that has no knowledge of Shepherding aka “Discipleship”. We fear that they are the “target market” of these hyper-authoritarian churches. After all, what age group will knowingly enter into a relationship with a church leader who is their “parental authority”? 
____________________________________________________________________________

Covenantal Nomism


EXCERPTS:
Covenantal nomism is a centerpiece in the theology of the NPP. Quoting Sanders, Guy Waters gives this definition:

One enters the covenant by baptism…. Once one enters the covenant, then membership provides salvation. Obedience to (or repentance for a transgression of) a specific set of commandments keeps one in the covenantal relationship, while repeated or heinous transgression removes one from membership.[4]

Under covenantal nomism one is placed in the covenant through the grace of God (although baptism is necessary). One does not earn a place in the covenant through works (except the work of baptism). However to maintain one’s position in the covenant requires obedience to the laws of the covenant. One enters the covenant by faith but stays in by works. Jack Hughes is correct when he notes,
The similarities to Roman Catholic theology are very striking. Roman Catholic theology teaches that infant baptism places one into the “covenant community” and as long as that person continues to observe the sacraments, he will preserve himself and be saved. That is legalism, salvation by works. 
_________________________________________________________________

MEMBERSHIP COVENANT OF MARK DRISCOLL'S MARS HILL CHURCH: 
_______________________________________________ 

Cross Baptist Church Membership Signing:


Uploaded on May 20, 2008

This video was of a recent service at The Cross Baptist Church which is a new church plant in Fort Worth, Texas. In an effort to take membership seriously, a new member class preceded a covenant signing ceremony.

Covenant Membership Videos (3 parts):


Membership Covenant Video "101":


_________________________________________________________________
THE SHEPHERDING MOVEMENT REVISITED:

The Shepherding Movement (sometimes called the "Discipleship Movement") was an influential and controversial movement within some British and American charismatic churches, emerging in the 1970s and early 1980s. The doctrine of the movement emphasized the "one another" passages of the New Testament, and the mentoring relationship described in 2 Timothy.

History


It began when four well-known Charismatic teachers, Bob MumfordDerek PrinceCharles Simpson, and Don Basham, responded to what they saw as a moral failure in a charismatic ministry in South Florida. Witnessing this failure, the four men felt mutually vulnerable without greater accountability structures in their lives. They also felt the charismatic movement was becoming individualistic and subjective. These realizations, led them to mutually submit their lives and ministries to one another. Ern Baxter was later added to the core leadership of the group, and they became known as the "Fort Lauderdale Five."

"A less known sixth associate was John Poole. Together these individuals formed the organization that would be 'the center of one of the most violent controversies (i.e., the Discipleship/Shepherding controversy) in Protestant charismatic history,' Christian Growth Ministries (CGM), headquartered in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida."

Their relationships, and the doctrines which they began to emphasize in support and definition of these relationships, gained wide approval, as they addressed a strongly felt three-fold need of many in the burgeoning charismatic movement: greater accountability, stronger character development, and deeper relationships. Other Charismatic ministers and some Pentecostal began to submit to the authority of the Ft. Lauderdale Five. The vertical, descending, "chain-of-command" the five ministers were successful in establishing —

"was a pyramid-shaped, multi-tiered organizational structure, which had at the top echelon of the pyramid (it just so happened) none other than the Fab Five themselves, who claimed (conveniently) to be in "submission" to each other, which arrangement, they purported, acted as a fail-safe "checks and balance" system to totally preclude them from falling prey to the corruptive properties of absolute power to which, historically, so many others (albeit, less spiritual than they, of course) succumbed."

At the zenith of the pseudo-movement, "They had a national network of followers who formed pyramids of sheep and shepherds. Down through the pyramid went the orders, it was alleged, while up the same pyramid went the tithes." The relationships that were formed became known theologically as "covenant relationships." A network of cell groups were formed. Members had to be submitted to a "shepherd", who in turn was submitted to the Five or their subordinates. "...large numbers of charismatic pastors began to be shepherded by the CGM leaders, a development that went uncharted but not unnoticed. It was uncharted because these relationships were personal and not institutional, so there were never any published lists of pastors and congregations being shepherded by CGM leaders...." At its height, an estimated 100,000 adherents across the US were involved in the networks.

Some of the early leaders of the movement came out of Campus Crusade for Christ, but Crusade itself did not embrace it. Other movements influenced by the Shepherding doctrine were the Shiloh houses scattered across the USA (some of them transitioned into Calvary Chapels when they abandoned the shepherding movement ideas), International Churches of ChristMaranatha Campus Ministries, and Great Commission International (today known as Great Commission Ministries/Great Commission Association of Churches). The movement emphasized the importance of a network of accountability within church members, with many individuals acting as personal pastors to others. In many cases, shepherding relationships existed outside the bounds of individual churches, leading to the unusual situation of a church member being accountable not to others in his/her church, but someone outside the church.

Criticism and controversy


The movement was a controversial one:

"The heat of the controversy can be captured by reading an open letter, dated June 27, 1975, from Pat Robertson to Bob Mumford. Robertson said that in a recent visit to Louisville, Kentucky, he found cultish language like"submission" rather than churches, "shepherds" not pastors, and "relationships" but not Jesus. Robertson traveled to ORU and found a twenty-year-old "shepherd" who drew tithes from fellow students as part of their submission. Robertson, drawing from Juan Carlos Ortiz's Call to Discipleship, charged the leaders with placing personal revelations (rhema) on par with Scripture. He quoted a devotee as saying, "If God Almighty spoke to me, and I knew for a certainty that it was God speaking, and if my shepherd told me to do the opposite, I would obey my shepherd."

The movement was denounced by charismatic leaders such as Pat Robertson and Demos Shakarian, and a 1975 meeting (known as "the shoot-out at the Curtis Hotel") to resolve the dispute achieved little.

"Pat Robertson banned the CGM leaders and erased all tapes that included them. Robertson used CBN to pronounce the shepherding teaching 'witchcraft' and said the only difference between the discipleship group and Jonestown was 'Kool-Aid.' Kathryn Kuhlman refused to appear together with Bob Mumford at the 1975 Conference on the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem.Demos Shakarian the founder and director of FGBMFI declared the CGM leaders persona non grata. The number of voices swelled as criticism came from Dennis Bennett, Ken Sumrall, Thomas F. Zimmerman (General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God), and David duPlessis."

The Fort Lauderdale Five eventually parted company. Derek Prince and Bob Mumford both publicly distanced themselves from the teachings. Derek Prince withdrew in 1983, stating his belief that "we were guilty of the Galatian error: having begun in the Spirit, we quickly degenerated into the flesh." Bob Mumford issued a "Formal Repentance Statement to the Body of Christ" in November 1989 and was quoted as saying, "I repent. I ask forgiveness." In the same article, Mumford also acknowledged abuses that had occurred because of his teaching on submission: "...Mumford decided that he needed to publicly 'repent' of his responsibility in setting up a system where so many people were hurt by misuses of authority. 'Some families were split up and lives turned upside down,' says Mumford. 'Some of these families are still not back together.'" This emphasis resulted in “perverse and unbiblical obedience” to leaders, said Mumford.

"In his statement, Mumford admitted that he had not heeded earlier warnings about doctrinal error from Hayford and two others. "While it was not my intent to be willful," he said, "I ignored their input to my own hurt and the injury of others." ...He admitted that there had been an "unhealthy submission resulting in perverse and unbiblical obedience to human leaders." He took personal responsibility for these abuses, saying that many of them happened under his sphere of leadership."

Today

The degree to which the Shepherding Movement still exists today is unclear. While both Charles Simpson and Bob Mumford have made public statements disavowing the movement, or at least distancing themselves from it, Simpson's biography on the website of Charles Simpson Ministries highlights his co-founding of New Wine Magazine and specifically mentions Baxter, Mumford, and Prince as "notable Bible teachers" associated with the magazine. The website also lists Derek Prince Ministries and Lifechangers by Bob Mumford as "ministry allies."
David Moore's 2004 book on the Shepherding Movement takes an impartial, scholarly look at the movement, which includes interviews with all living primary and many secondary individuals.
The Shepherding Movement ideologies live on today in some groups, most notably the Korean group called University Bible Fellowship, who is currently active on over 70 US college campuses.
____________________________________________________________________
EPHESIANS 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.

A PUBLIC SERMON NECESSITATES PUBLIC EXPOSURE, SINCE THE SOULS OF MANY ARE HANGING IN THE BALANCE:

PASTOR TUTEN SHOWS HIS TRUE COLORS; 
NOT USED TO BEING CRITIQUED

PASTOR TUTEN DEFAULTS TO "AD HOMINEM" ATTACK, 
FALSE ACCUSATION, FALSE GUILT 
AND MISAPPLICATION OF MATTHEW 18 
IN HIS DEVILISH RESPONSE;
SHOWS NO REPENTANCE; JUST BOW DOWN TO HIM,
AS SEEN BELOW:
Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

"I assume you are the author of the article that I just read that you posted relative to a sermon I delivered to our church (Liberty Baptist in Bear, Delaware) just yesterday morning.  I also assume that we must have met and that you have had an opportunity to cross check your "facts" directly with me since you apparently think you know me so well that you can go directly to a blog with my picture and alleged quotes within 24 hours of said message without making even a feeble attempt to reach out to me and get clarification on what is a massive misrepresentation of me and what I am attempting to do in this sermon series. Oh, that's right - we have NEVER met and you never even attempted to follow the basic principles laid down in Matthew 18 (you know, the part that commands you to go to the one with whom you have "aught" - ALONE!) or show to me an attempt at respect. I am disgusted that you would do this. I am sure that in your mind you are completely justified but in reality you are completely wrong in your conclusions and assumptions. You don't know me and you know nothing about me so why don't you go back to the hole you crawled out of and leave me alone. 
     Having said that, I am NOT afraid of you nor would I shy away from an opportunity of talking TO you. So since you showed your incredible smallness by what you did, I will show you another way. If you are sincerely interested in getting clarification directly from me, I am more than willing to talk with you. My cell # is 302.438.1787
    Do the right thing, John. 


George W. Tuten III - Senior and Founding Pastor of Liberty Baptist Church in Bear, Delaware."
______________________________________________________________________________