Translate

Friday, January 13, 2017

BAPTIST "CHURCH" IN NATION'S CAPITOL HIRES "MARRIED" LESBIAN WOMEN TO LEAD CONGREGATION~ONE CAME FROM A UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST "CHURCH"

 BIBLICALLY UNQUALIFIED FOR OPEN & ACTIVE HOMOSEXUALITY, FLAGRANT APOSTASY & SIN, DISQUALIFIED FROM PASTORATE FOR BEING FEMALES
BUT CALVARY BAPTIST WAS "IMPRESSED" 
 "As we met and talked with Sally and Maria about their vision for pastoral leadership at Calvary, we were struck by their deep faith and commitment to being part of a gospel community." And, what "gospel" would THAT be?" (Quote from second article below)
 http://www.gaystarnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Married_Couple_Lesbian_Pastors.jpg
BAPTIST "CHURCH" IN NATION'S CAPITOL HIRES "MARRIED" LESBIAN WOMEN TO LEAD CONGREGATION~ONE CAME FROM A UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST "CHURCH"
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON, D.C. — A historic Baptist 
“church” in the nation’s capital has hired two “married” lesbian women 
to lead their congregation, a move that has raised concerns among 
Baptists nationwide.
Calvary Baptist Church, which disassociated with the Southern Baptist Convention in 2012, presented Maria Swearingen and Sally Sarratt as “co-pastors” this past Sunday, according to a press release from the Ministerial Selection Committee.
The two hail from Greenville, South Carolina as Sarratt had been serving as associate chaplain in the Greenville Health System and Swearingen as associate chaplain at Furman University. Sarratt had also been working part time at Greenville Unitarian Universalist Fellowship.
“As we met and talked with Sally and Maria about their vision for pastoral leadership at Calvary, we were struck by their deep faith and commitment to being part of a gospel community,” Committee Chair Carol Blythe said in a statement.

“We were impressed by how their gifts, talents, and experience matched our ministry priorities—and we are thrilled about their upcoming pastorate and the versatility the co-pastor model will provide our congregation,” she added.
The women are expected to assume their roles in February.
But some have expressed concern over the arrangement, including Albert Mohler of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.

“Here you have a church—Calvary Baptist Church, one of the most historic congregations in the nation’s capital—that has now called a legally married lesbian couple as co-pastors,” he said on Tuesday during his podcast “The Briefing.” “The overarching pattern [in this matter] is the trajectory of American Protestant liberalism. That liberalism began as an impulse to try to modify Christianity so that it would fit better into a modern age.”
Mohler opined that the problems, however, go deeper than lesbianism, as he noted that one of the women works as a minister for a universalist assembly.
The Unitarian Universalist Association website outlines, “Few of us believe in divine judgment after death. It’s in our religious DNA: the Universalist side of our tradition broke with mainstream Christianity by rejecting the idea of eternal damnation.”
“If the [District of Columbia Baptist Convention] does not expel Calvary Baptist Church from their membership, then they by very definition simply become a convention that will accept—that indeed does accept—a church that has legally married lesbian co-pastors in terms of their own membership,” Mohler stated.
But Convention director Robert Cochran told reporters that the organization has no intention of expelling Calvary Baptist.
“We have no plans to disassociate [with Calvary]. To the best of my knowledge, the D.C. Baptist Convention, due to its respect for local congregational autonomy, has never withdrawn fellowship from any congregation,” he told the Baptist Press.
As previously reported, in 2014, Calvary Baptist ordained Daniel Robinson, a “transgender” who goes by the name Allyson Robinson.
“Allyson Dylan Robinson is a minister of the gospel, trained for the task, and ordained to the gospel ministry by another community in which she has served as pastor,” former leader Amy Butler wrote at that time. “Over the course of her journey, God has invited her to step into the faithful witness of a new identity, a true identity, and a new name.”
Robinson now speaks as an itinerant preacher and appeared at Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner’s renaming ceremony in 2015.
“Frankly I consider Job, Gautama Buddha, Joan of Arc, Rumi and Johnny Cash to be my spiritual predecessors far more than Augustine, Aquinas or Barth,” he told the Alliance of Baptists in April. “My hymnal has a lot less Isaac Watts and Fanny Crosby, but it’s full of Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Tupac and Beyonce.”

______________________________________________________
SCHIZOPHRENIC HERESY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Donna Wasson
November 12, 2016
NewsWithViews.com
In the past 48 hours, I've read of two different "Christian" churches whose heretical views and teachings are at opposite ends of the spectrum of stupid. I have to sometimes wonder what parallel universe these pastors reside in, because their sense of Biblical reality is so skewed and perverted, as to be comical.
Allow me to introduce church number one: Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, AZ, founded and pastored by Steven Anderson. This gentleman is a self-ordained preacher with no college degree or professional training whatsoever. Now, considering the unholy tripe Bible seminaries are teaching today, that isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, without any traditional parameters to hold one accountable it's easy to run off the rails into the jungle of personal opinion with regard to scriptural interpretation.
His bio on the church website states that he was raised in California and traveled through Germany and Eastern Europe for 3 months, serving in several local Baptist churches, studying foreign languages and getting experience in the ministry. Wow. All that knowledge crammed into 3 whole months! It goes on to state he has "well over 140 chapters of the Bible memorized word-for-word, including approximately half of the New Testament." This is shocking to me, considering how he loves to quote Leviticus.
You see, this is a man who has appeared on TV talk shows, been interviewed by radio stations and news casts for the sole reason he LOVES to curse and denigrate homosexuals, quoting scripture about how God commanded they be executed. Now, I know what you're thinking. "Dang, Donna! You've done the same thing!" Well, no I haven't. I've spoken out against homosexuality for years, explaining what the Bible has to say about this practice and referring to those who indulge in that sin as the Bible does, "sodomites."
But, I've NEVER cursed them, called them names, or come close to hinting I HATE them like this man does, ala the finest tradition of in-bred members of the Westboro Baptist Church. Mr. Anderson consistently quotes the Levitical mandate to put gays to death and openly states that if all homosexuals were killed off, AIDS would be eradicated.
He goes out into the community, confronting homosexual citizens, thumping and shaking his Bible at them, yelling such things as "Shut your damn mouth! I don't want to hear a word you have to say!" He told one gay radio host who was interviewing him that he hoped the man came down with brain cancer and died. He has repeatedly stood in front of his congregation and hysterically screamed that no "queers or faggots" would EVER darken the door of that church as long as he is the pastor! EVER! And if anyone didn't like that, they could go to another church.
He has a massive You Tube following in which he preaches that there is no scripture in the Bible that tells us we should repent. He also has a personal mandate to see to it that the teaching of the pre-tribulation rapture is wiped off the face of the earth because "it's a satanic lie!" He preaches against birth control of any kind (He has 9 children), and the women of the congregation don't wear makeup and don't work outside the home. They breed. Kinda sounds cultish, doesn't it?
The problem I have with this guy is he is wildly popular and has hundreds of sermons freely available for download off the church's website. These sermons are filled with screeching, hate-filled, scripture-twisting, heretical diatribe that doesn't even come close to reflecting the teachings of Jesus. Yet, he receives copious media attention, and you can guess why.
The world is fascinated and delighted when they come across a freak like this because he reinforces every fallacy they hold about what Christians act like, and justifies their hated of Christ and God. Thanks a pant-load, Mr. Anderson. You are nothing more than sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal, because you do not LOVE.
Does God hate homosexuality? Yes, He calls it an abomination in His eyes. Does He hate homosexuals? No. He loved them so much, He sent His only begotten Son to die for them. Did Jesus ever scream and curse the lost, broken dregs of society He ministered to? No. He was lovingly firm, forgiving, healing, and cautioned them to "go and sin no more."
Time for church number two. Walk with me to the opposite end of the heretical spectrum, to Calvary Baptist Church in Washington, D.C., who just named a "married" lesbian couple, Sally Sarratt and Maria Swearingen, to co-pastor its congregation. *sigh* REALLY folks?
Church spokeswoman, Carol Blythe, told the Religion News Service "We look for the best people in the world and that's who they were. We're very excited. As we met and talked with Sally and Maria about their vision for pastoral leadership at Calvary, we were struck by their deep faith and commitment to being part of a gospel community." And, what "gospel" would THAT be?
When presented to the congregation during Sunday services, Swearingen and Sarratt told church members: "We have found it so easy to fall in love with Calvary and its longstanding commitment to be a voice of justice and compassion for those who perpetually find the wholeness of their humanity disregarded and maligned." Lovely. This church now has two social justice warriors who sport a large some-people-don't-completely-accept-and-celebrate-our-lifestyle-choice chip on their shoulder, as co-pastors.
So, we go from a pastor who sincerely invokes death and disease on gays during his wild-eyed, foam-spitting sermons, as he literally jumps on top of his pulpit to make a point, all the way to having two SJW lesbian queens appointed as shepherds over a flock of CINO's. Well, who can say for sure? There may actually be a few bona-fide, Bible believing Christians in both those churches. If there are, I hope they run away fast enough that the doorknob doesn't hit them in the back!
What in heaven's name is wrong with these people? From what Biblical source are they receiving their theology? What god are they supposedly serving? How can they be so deluded as to be convinced they're pleasing to and/or accurately representing Almighty God and His Son? I'm getting a headache.
One pastor spews pure, blind, vitriolic, white-hot hatred while the other two are busy filling out their Sisters of Sappho membership cards. And we marvel that the 'church' is so screwed up! Poor God; what disappointment and disgust He must feel when He surveys this earth. The gospel is so simple, yet what has mankind done to it? Twisted it; perverted the message; fractured it into countless factions of denominations, each one sure their views are the 'right' ones.
No wonder Jesus warned "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." -Matthew 7:13-14 (KJV) As time goes on, it becomes clearer every day just how few people really WILL find the narrow gate.
Look folks, the mandate isn't difficult to understand. Jesus made it very simple, and God left us the incomparable masterpiece of the Bible to guide us in how to relate to others and navigate our way through this cesspool we call the world.
"Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." -Matthew 22:36-40 (KJV) There. Told you it was simple. Now do it!
But, are we supposed to just accept homosexuality? What if they want to come into the church? Whattaya think the church is for?! It's a spiritual intensive care unit for the sick and lost. Yes, you welcome homosexuals into your church. And you love them and lead them to Jesus, explaining Christ's salvation as well as the consequences for refusing that gift.
If they are truly born again, the Bible tells us "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17 (KJV) That's when the pastor and deacons can begin to pray for their deliverance, and hold them accountable regarding renouncing their gay lifestyle. They may struggle for a time because of all the brainwashing they've suffered over the years, but there IS hope.
What if they refuse to change their actions, saying they are born that way and just can't help their feelings? Well, our 'feelings' are meaningless. We are ALL tempted in some aspect of sin. Sodomy is simply their weakness. That doesn't give them license to give into that temptation and act on it any more than other members giving in to their desire to fornicate, commit adultery or abuse drugs.
 Jesus was clear when He cautioned people about following Him. There IS a cost involved and sometimes that cost is painful and uncomfortable. It's a sacrifice. "And he said to them all, 'If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.'" Luke 9:23 (KJV) There may come a time where they have to choose what is more important: following Jesus or satisfying their sexual appetite.

If they choose homosexuality, then the Bible outlines how the elders and pastor are to deal with them. But it NEVER includes screaming threats of hellfire and hatred, nor does it direct that Christians accept and overlook their sin. No matter what, they are to be treated with respect and love; sometimes tough love, but love nonetheless.
The fact that I'm even writing about this is proof positive that we are in the last seconds of the Age of Grace. The door to the ark of safety is closing, and God's wrath on this depraved generation is about to fall. Are you saved?
______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
 Pastrix Paula White to Wax Eloquent Against Critics Avoiding Fundamentals of Scripture
EXCERPT: 
 "In 1 Timothy 2:12-13 the role of women in the context of the church setting is as stated, “But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.”  Take note that this is not cultural mandate, the Apostle Paul uniquely adds a clarifier that this is from the creation of man and women establishing the order of Federal Headship and which gender is to lead the church. In other words, Paul’s words here are not an opinion but a doctrinal statement."
 

Thursday, January 12, 2017

TRUMP CALLS CNN & BUZZFEED FAKE NEWS IN PRESS CONFERENCE~REBUFFS ATTEMPTS BY CNN TO DOMINATE HIM

TRUMP CALLS CNN & BUZZFEED FAKE NEWS IN PRESS CONFERENCE

  Trump To CNN: You're FAKE NEWS! 

 Published on Jan 11, 2017

Donald Trump calls CNN fake news! At Tump’s press conference today, he slammed CNN ‘reporter’ Jim Acosta and his network as “Fake News.” The ‘reporter’ didn’t take it too well and began shouting and interrupting actual reporters who were trying to ask President Elect Trump a question. Donald also called their organization terrible. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.

Trump Tower NY Full Press Conference, 

January 11, 2017

Donald Trump holds his first press conference as President-elect 01-11-17

WITH AGGRESSIVE INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 


ZUCKERBERG'S MINISTRY OF TRUTH: FACEBOOK LAUNCHES "JOURNALISM PROJECT" TO "IMPROVE MEDIA"~TRUTH & REALITY DECIDED THE WAY THEY SEE IT

 "DECIDER & ARBITER 
OF TRUTH & REALITY" 
(THE WAY FACEBOOK SEES IT)
 Ministry of Truth: Facebook Launches 'Journalism Project' to 'Improve Media'
ZUCKERBERG'S MINISTRY OF TRUTH: 
FACEBOOK LAUNCHES "JOURNALISM PROJECT" 
TO "IMPROVE MEDIA" 
 Zuckerberg to dictate "reality"
BY JAMIE WHITE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Facebook has launched its so-called ‘Journalism Project’ as a way for the social media giant to further bolster its position as a news media organization and promote what it determines to be real news.
Part of the project would focus on “improving its storytelling formats such as Live, 360, and Instant Articles,” Facebook stated Wednesday.
“We want to work with publishers to build products that enable them to tell better stories, connect with their audiences in richer ways and support emerging business models for publishers,” Facebook VP of global operations and media partnerships Justin Osofsky said.

Facebook also said that it would begin working with third-party organizations like left-leaning Snopes.com to “promote news literacy” and to “flag” what it deems to be fake news to help users discern what’s trustworthy and what’s not, effectively making the decision for its users.
In other words, Facebook said it will be the decider and arbiter of truth and reality.
“To combat fake news, Facebook has partnered with a shortlist of media organizations, including Snopes and ABC News, that are part of an international fact-checking network led by Poynter, a nonprofit school for journalism located in St. Petersburg, Florida,” reported Business Insider last month.
In light of Buzzfeed and CNN’s recent epic failure publishing a hoax report from 4chan about President-elect Trump being compromised by Russia, Facebook’s credibility is also on the line because it widely disseminated that fake story in its news feed, prompting the company’s fact-checker Poytner to save face by condemning the “irresponsible” publication.
“Publishing an entirely unvetted document is a significant departure from the way editors of most significant publications would define the role of reporting,” they wrote.
As we’ve reported, mainstream media and Facebook are scrambling to remain relevant after losing all credibility attacking Trump leading up to the election, and are doubling down in their attempts to invert reality to serve their fake narrative.

 

CHINA TO PRESENT ITSELF AS DEFENDER OF GLOBALISM AT DAVOS, SWITZERLAND

CHINA TO PRESENT ITSELF AS DEFENDER OF GLOBALISM AT DAVOS, SWITZERLAND 
 European leaders snub forum despite focus on combating rise of populism
BY CLIFFORD CUNNINGHAM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Chinese President Xi Jingping is expected to aggressively challenge President-elect Donald Trump and the growing number of populist movements across Europe at the upcoming World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.
While Premiers of China, including the current Premier Li Keqiang, have attended Davos in the past, Jinping’s attendance marks the first time a Chinese president (who also serves as the head of the Chinese Communist Party) will attend the World Economic Forum.
Jinping is expected to address his desire to move “economic globalization towards greater inclusiveness.”

“Clearly it signals that Xi Jinping is now interested in writing both China and himself in a grander way on the global diplomatic horizon,” said Orville Schell, director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at the Asia Society. “He feels it’s time to really come out. Behind that probably is an assumption and wishful thinking that the U.S. is in disarray, Europe is feckless, and so on.”
“He’ll be received almost as the number one citizen at Davos.”
The organizers of the World Economic Forum, mindful of a rising populist sentiment across Europe and the United States that resulted in a successful referendum for the UK to leave the European Union and the election of President Donald Trump, have cast this year’s theme as “responsive and responsible leadership.”
“Every simplified approach to deal with the global complex agenda is condemned to fail. We cannot just have populist solutions,” said Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum. “The problems we face technologically, economically, socially and politically are so tremendous, such that sustainable solutions requite a systemic, holistic approach… and particularly the collaboration of all global stakeholders, united in one mission – improving the state of the world.”
Despite the inclusion of populism on the agenda, many European leaders have paradoxically decided to not attend this year’s forum.
The leaders of France, Germany, Italy, and Spain have all indicated they will not attend, opting to send their respective finance ministers instead.
The United States will be represented by Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry; as the forum’s closing ceremony will take place just hours before Trump is inaugurated, he will be represented by transition team member Anthony Scaramucci.
VIDEO:

JEFF SESSIONS PLEDGES TO FOLLOW SUPREME COURT RULINGS UPHOLDING ABORTION & "GAY MARRIAGE"

 
JEFF SESSIONS PLEDGES TO FOLLOW SUPREME COURT RULINGS UPHOLDING ABORTION & "GAY MARRIAGE" 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, 
who has been nominated to serve as United States attorney general, told a
 congressional panel on Tuesday during his confirmation hearing that 
while he disagrees with Supreme Court rulings on abortion and 
homosexuality, he concedes that the decisions are the “law of the land” 
and will uphold them accordingly.
“You have referred to Roe v. Wade as ‘one of the worst, colossally erroneous Supreme Court decisions of all time,’” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, noted. “Is that still your view?”
“It is,” Sessions replied. “I believe it violated the Constitution, and really attempted to set policy and not follow law.”
But, he added, “It is the law of the land. It has been so established and settled for quite a long time. It deserves respect, and I would respect it and follow it.”

When asked later about the issue of same-sex “marriage,” Sessions said that he likewise disagreed with the Supreme Court on the matter, but will uphold the ruling regardless of his beliefs.
“[T]he president elect said that the issue of same-sex marriage was ‘already settled; it’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. It’s done, and I’m fine with that,'” Feinstein noted, quoting from remarks made by Donald Trump during a November interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes.”
She then asked Sessions, “Do you agree that the issue of same-sex marriage is settled law?”

“The Supreme Court has ruled on that. The dissents dissented vigorously, but it was 5-4, and five justices on the Supreme Court. The majority of the court has established the definition of marriage for the entire United States of America, and I will follow that decision,” he replied.
Feinstein then inquired how Sessions believes that Obergefell v. Hodges is the law, but Roe v. Wade is not.
“I haven’t said that a woman’s right to choose or Roe v. Wade and its progeny is not the law of the land or not clear today, so I would follow that law,” he contended.
Sessions had also been asked if he would ensure that rape exceptions under the Hyde Amendment—which prohibits federal funds from being used for abortion—are upheld, such as in cases when the woman becomes pregnant as a result of sex trafficking. He likewise replied that he would follow the law in such cases.
According to reports, Sessions serves as a Sunday school teacher at Ashland Place United Methodist Church in Mobile, Alabama.

 

TRUMP'S DAMAGE CONTROL VS. OBAMA'S SATANIC LEGACY OF DEATH & DESTRUCTION

ASSANGE: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DESTROYING PUBLIC DOCUMENTS IN FINAL DAYS

ASSANGE: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DESTROYING PUBLIC DOCUMENTS IN FINAL DAYS
BY MICHAEL TENNANT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The Obama administration, in its waning days, is busily destroying public records to protect its image, charged WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
“Past administrations of both Democrat and Republican players have engaged in mass destruction of records as they left office,” Assange said in a live streamed press conference Monday. “We are told that destruction of records is occurring now in different parts of the Obama administration in different departments or agencies.”
“One understands the political motivation for it,” he explained, “but to eliminate small political risks by destroying major elements of history is, frankly, an obscenity.”
One needn’t go far back in history to find examples of administrations that “lost” or destroyed documents or e-mails, often those with political implications.
The most famous recent example, of course, is Hillary Clinton, who maintained a private, unsecured e-mail server while serving as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state and did not turn it over to the government for archiving after leaving office. Obama later lied about his knowledge of this server, the existence of which enabled Clinton to withhold documents related to the Benghazi debacle from congressional investigators.
The Obama administration also destroyed all e-mails related to the operation that culminated in the alleged death of Osama bin Laden.
The George W. Bush administration, which destroyed videos documenting the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) torture of detainees, claimed to have lost some 22 million e-mails over the course of six years, including all e-mails from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney during certain periods. In reality, the administration “had simply shut down the Clinton [administration’s] automatic e-mail archive,” supposedly because of a server switch, wrote Newsweek.

The Clinton administration, Newsweek explained, had set up the archive in the wake of a lawsuit “that prevented 6,000 White House e-mail backup tapes from being erased” near the end of the George H.W. Bush administration. That administration, like the Reagan administration (which installed the first White House e-mail system) before it, did not maintain e-mail archives despite the 1978 Presidential Records Act’s mandate that all presidential and vice presidential records be preserved. A large number of executive branch e-mails — the Bush administration sent about 200 million — were, therefore, lost to posterity, undoubtedly saving certain Reagan and Bush administration figures from embarrassment, and possibly legal action, in their retirement.
This is not to say the Clinton administration was a model of records preservation. Numerous documents related to the Whitewater investigation were later found in the personal residence of the Clinton White House. And unlike Reagan — who also got key documents related to the Iran-Contra affair shredded while he was in office — and the two Presidents Bush, Bill Clinton has managed to get records destroyed or disappeared even after leaving office. In 2003, Clinton’s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, smuggled five terrorism-related classified documents out of the National Archives and destroyed them, for which he was fined $50,000 and sentenced to five years’ probation. Last year, it emerged that documents related to the probe by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) into the death of Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster had vanished from the National Archives, as had a two-terabyte hard drive from the Clinton administration.
Given all this, it would hardly be surprising to discover that Obama, despite his promise of the “most transparent” administration in history, was, as Assange asserts, even now trying to cover his tracks by destroying documents. Contrary to the repeated claims of Obama’s supporters, his administration did have plenty of scandals that he would surely like to forget — and probably some that he hopes never come to light.
“Our philosophy is that such information [presidential records] is a part of history. It belongs, legally and philosophically, to the American people and more broadly, insofar as the United States interacts with the world, it belongs to the people of the world,” Assange said. “It is part of human history, and the destruction of major archives of human history, frankly, should be formally listed as a crime against humanity because those archives belong to humanity.”
WikiLeaks is offering a $30,000 reward for information leading to the arrest or exposure of any Obama administration figures involved in the destruction of documents. Assange urged “system administrators in the Obama administration” to “take the data now” and then give it to “WikiLeaks or other journalists at your leisure.”
“Get hold of that history and protect it,” Assange said, “because that is something that belongs to humanity and does not belong to a political party.”

UN DEMANDS MORE GLOBALIST PROPAGANDA IN SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS

UN DEMANDS MORE GLOBALIST PROPAGANDA 
IN SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Under the direction of a known Communist Party operative from Bulgaria dogged by corruption charges, the scandal-plagued United Nations “education” agency released a new report demanding broad changes to school textbooks around the world. It is the latest shot across the bow aimed at parental rights, local control of education, and national sovereignty.
The goal of the “Global Education Monitoring Report” by the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is fairly transparent: accelerate the indoctrination of impressionable children worldwide with textbook propaganda promoting “global citizenship,” the discredited man-made global-warming theory, homosexuality, transgenderism, and outright totalitarianism. And according to the report itself, school textbooks are the best way to do that.
“Few instruments shape children’s and young people’s minds more powerfully than the teaching and learning materials used in schools,” begins the report, hitting on something understood by every mass-murdering tyrant from Chinese Communist Chairman Mao and Soviet Communist Joseph Stalin to National Socialist Adolph Hitler. “Textbooks convey not only knowledge but also social values and political identities.”

The UN report focuses on whether the UN's agenda for global totalitarian rule is being promoted vigorously enough in school books. The report seeks “to measure the extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development, … , are mainstreamed in national education policies, curricula, teacher education and student assessments,” reads the first page of the revealing document. A German library of school textbooks from around the world was used for the study.
The report, published by UNESCO in December, celebrates the fact that, around the world, more and more captive students are being bombarded with globalist propaganda through textbooks. The document is filled with graphs gleefully highlighting the rapid expansion of textbooks that promote the UN's controversial causes across a range of issues: globalism, pseudo-environmentalism, gender confusion, multiculturalism, and more.
However, the report, also dubbed “Policy Paper 28,” laments that students in some countries are still not receiving a satisfactory dose of UN-backed indoctrination. Education authorities in numerous countries, including the United States, came under fire in the UNESCO document for failing to promptly incorporate the UN's latest demands, as outlined in the Agenda 2030 “Sustainable Development Goals.”   
Despite the “progress” in hijacking control of textbook content, the UN claims much more must be done. “As this policy paper shows, textbooks in many countries still fail to deal comprehensively, clearly and fairly with concepts that are crucial,” the report claims, citing the UN's bizarre version of “human rights” (the opposite of individual God-given rights as understood and protected in America by the Constitution), so-called “gender equality,” environmental activism, “social cohesion,” and more.
“All governments should urgently review and revise their textbooks to ensure that the content covers these ideas, which are integral to Target 4.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals,” the report continues, with the reference to the illegal pseudo-treaty signed by Obama aiming to “transform our world,” as the UN puts it in the agreement. Perhaps not surprisingly, the mass-murdering dictatorship in Communist China boasted openly of its “crucial role” in creating the dictator-backed Agenda 2030. 
The relevant UN Agenda 2030 goal touted by UNESCO, which this magazine has cited on numerous occasions, focuses on “education” in particular. It calls on the UN and governments to “ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, ... global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity.”
In other words, it not enough to just learn to love the UN's totalitarian ideology of “sustainable development”; children must be so thoroughly indoctrinated that they actually promote it. UN Agenda 2030 is very clear in its plan to exploit and weaponize young children, too, turning them into what the UN document refers to as “critical agents of change.” The Agenda 2030 also says children “will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world.”
And throughout the new UNESCO report, the goal of exploiting and indoctrinating children to demand global tyranny is crystal clear. On environmentalism, for example, the UN's agenda for turning kids into globalist activists is transparent. “As well as ensuring that environmental problems are seen as global issues, it is critical for textbooks to develop students’ sense of agency,” the UNESCO report declares.
In other words, impressionable young children must be taught to believe that the UN must solve real and imagined “environmental problems” because they are “global issues.” And the students must be turned into activists demanding UN control over environmental issues, the report argues. Throughout the report, textbooks that teach children how to become pro-UN activists receive favorable coverage while those that do not encourage activism by the children are chastised for not doing enough. 
In the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, UNESCO complains that “textbooks are primarily a medium for teaching children scientific facts and make little to no effort to contextualize environmental education.” Stated another way, schools books must not simply teach facts, but must be weaponized and politicized to advance the UN's agenda.
Global citizenship education is also a frequent topic in the report and all throughout the UN's global indoctrination efforts masquerading as education. Fortunately for readers, the UNESCO report even describes the real agenda. “Global citizenship education aims to inculcate students with a notion of belonging not just to their own country but to broader trans-national and global entities,” the document explains.
Do you “belong” to “trans-national and global entities”? Your children might think they do — at least if UNESCO gets its way. And indeed, Obama's Education Secretary Arne Duncan boasted that UNESCO was his “global partner” in creating “green” global citizens thoroughly indoctrinated in the UN's dangerous “sustainable development” ideology. Quoting a proud communist terrorist, Duncan spoke of “education” as a “weapon” to “change the world.”  
Also coming under fire are school textbooks that show women and mothers in “traditional roles,” including the performance of “housework.” In some Turkish textbooks, UNESCO complains, “traditional roles among the females in the house (mother, daughter) are portrayed in the context of cooperation.” “Moreover, women are rarely depicted as working women,” the report complains. In other words, in the UN's view, women are for working and paying taxes, not for being mothers, and to suggest otherwise is to run afoul of the UN's anti-family, pro-abortion “gender equality” demands.
The report also complains that many textbooks around the world do not sufficiently promote homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, transgenderism, and more. “While textbooks call for tolerance of diversity, sexual diversity is repeatedly excluded,” the report complains. Unsurprisingly, the Swedish government is praised by the radical UN agency for promoting homosexuality and homosexual parenting in school textbooks.
Other UNESCO “education” documents also call for the sexualization of children. The “International Guidelines for Sexuality Education” released in 2009, for instance, call for teaching children starting at age five that masturbation is “pleasurable.” By age nine, children begin lessons on “aphrodisiacs,” “homophobia,” “trans-phobia,” the alleged safety and desirability of legal abortion, and various perversions. By age 15, the children learn how to “promote the right to and access to safe abortion.” Agents of change, indeed.
Some textbooks used in American schools come under fire in the new UNESCO report just for providing factual information — in this case, true facts about alleged man-made climate change that challenges the UN's discredited narrative. “The textbooks not only cast doubt on the causes of climate change but also emphasize its positive effects and describing [sic] its negative effects as uncertain,” fume the UNESCO authors, highlighting a textbook that points out the well-known fact that not all scientists agree with the UN's failed theory.
It also acts as if warming leading to increasing agricultural yields were a taboo subject that cannot be uttered in the presence of children, even while explicit sexual material is supposed to be not only appropriate but mandatory for children under five years old. “None of the textbooks analysed contained a call to action explicitly linking student behavior or need to take mitigating actions,” the report added about some American textbooks that fail to call on students to become climate-justice warriors.
Ironically, despite the lip service given to non-violence, the UN's record in this area is sordid beyond belief. UN “peace” troops, for example, have rightly developed a reputation around the world as vicious predators, with UN forces implicated in systematic rape and sexual exploitation of children in virtually every country ever occupied by the UN. Killings of unarmed protesters and civilians by UN forces also occur regularly, going back generations.
Schools run by the UN, meanwhile, were exposed yet again last year training Arab children to wage constant “holy war” against their Jewish neighbors. By contrast, the UNESCO report criticizes some Western textbooks for highlighting Islamic military history, arguing that the facts might lead people to associate Islam with violence. 
As The New American has highlighted on multiple occasions, textbooks are just one facet of the problem. The UN actually has a transparent agenda to re-shape the ethics, values, beliefs, attitudes, and even the spirituality of children — according to the UN's own top leaders. “We have the collective duty to empower every child and youth with the right foundations — knowledge, values and skills — to shape the future as responsible global citizens,” declared UNESCO boss Irina Bokova, a longtime senior operative with the mass-murdering Bulgarian Communist Party.
Just last week, a UN group of self-styled “human rights experts” slammed a local school district in Connecticut and demanded that it choose new textbooks. And this is just the beginning, as the UN becomes increasingly bold and vicious in attacking U.S. independence, liberties, and self-government.
The latest UNESCO report on textbooks concludes with the recommendation that textbooks around the world be revised as soon as national governments' curricula are updated to meet the UN's demands for the UN “sustainable development agenda.” “Guidelines explicitly related to environmental issues, peace and global citizenship, sustainable development, human rights and gender equality need to be integrated within textbook review processes,” the document demands.
The report never does explain why the tiny group of fringe globalists and communists running UNESCO and other radical UN bureaucracies should have any say at all in school standards and textbooks used by American children. Yet, the real agenda is clear: As every dictator of the 20th century has understood, to be sustainable, tyranny must be inculcated in the minds of the youth from an early age.
As of right now, U.S. law prohibits any American taxpayer funding for UNESCO. And the UN more broadly is skating on thin ice amid ongoing attacks on American freedoms and self-government. But that is not nearly enough. The U.S. government should totally withdraw from UNESCO, along with exiting and defunding the entire dictators club that is the UN. The minds of the youth, and therefore the future of freedom and self-government, literally depend on stopping the rogue global organization from achieving its goals.


Related articles:  
UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
UN Adopts “Education” Plan to Indoctrinate Children in Globalism
UN Speaks Out Against School Textbooks in America
UN Goals for Humanity Target Children as “Agents of Change”
UN Schools Caught Teaching Arab Children to Wage Jihad on Jews
Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress
Homeschooling Offers Hope
UN: Gov’t Must Control Private Schools Because of “Human Rights”
UN Plots Future of Education: Creating Green “Global Citizens”
Common Core and UN Agenda 21: Mass Producing Green Global Serfs
Schooling for World Government: UNESCO’s Global Citizenship Education Forum
The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked
UN Pushes Common Core-style Global Education Regime
UNESCO Report: Sex Guidelines for Kids From Birth
United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.
Corrupt Communist UNESCO Boss Leads Race for UN SG Job

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

ANARCHISTS ARE HOPING TO TURN TRUMP'S INAUGURATION INTO ONE OF THE BIGGEST RIOTS IN U.S. HISTORY

ANARCHISTS ARE HOPING TO TURN TRUMP'S INAUGURATION INTO ONE OF THE BIGGEST RIOTS 
IN U.S. HISTORY 

Revealed: Planned Disruption Of Election


  
Their stated goal is to “disrupt” the Inauguration festivities as much as possible, and they are planning a wide range of “actions” to achieve that stated goal
BY MICHAEL SNYDER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Radical leftists are planning to make January 20th the most chaotic Inauguration Day in American history. 
Their stated goal is to “disrupt” the Inauguration festivities as much as possible, and they are planning a wide range of “actions” to achieve that stated goal.  Some of the more moderate groups are using terms such as “civil resistance” and “civil disobedience”, but others are openly talking about “blockades”, jumping barricades, throwing projectiles and “citywide paralysis”.  My hope is that all of their efforts will turn out to be a big flop, but it is important to understand that these groups are well funded, highly organized and extremely motivated.  The election of Donald Trump has been perhaps the single most galvanizing moment for the radical left in modern American history, and they are working very hard to turn January 20th into a major political statement.
In fact, just recently one activist group took out a full page ad in the New York Times…

Thousands of activists, journalists, scientists, entertainers, and other prominent voices took out a full-page call to action in the New York Times on Wednesday making clear their rejection of President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence with the simple message: “No!”
“Stop the Trump/Pence regime before it starts! In the name of humanity we refuse to accept a fascist America!” the ad states, followed by a list of signatories that includes scholar Cornel West; author Alice Walker; Chase Iron Eyes of the Standing Rock Sioux; educator Bill Ayers; poet Saul Williams; CNN‘s Marc Lamont Hill; Carl Dix of the Communist Party USA; and numerous others.
The ad pointed people to refusefascism.org, and it asserted that Trump must be stopped whether he was legitimately elected or not…
Trump promises to inflict repression and suffering on people in this country, to deport millions, to increase violence up to the use of nuclear weapons on people across the globe, and to inflict catastrophes upon the planet itself. He has assembled a cabinet of Christian fundamentalist fanatics, war mongers, racists, science deniers. NO! His regime must not be allowed to consolidate. We REFUSE to accept a Fascist America!
If you go to refusefascism.org, you will discover that the protests that they are organizing in Washington D.C. will begin on January 14th.  They say that they want to “stop the Trump-Pence regime before it starts”, and they hope to have protests going “every day and every night” without interruption through at least January 20th.
Another group that plans to kick things off on January 14th is DisruptJ20.  Of course that is short for “Disrupt January 20th”.  If you go to their official website, you will find a long slate of events that have already been scheduled.
According to Legba Carrefour, a spokesperson for DisruptJ20, one of the goals of the group is to block major transportation routes into and throughout our nation’s capital.  And he is not shy about the fact that they literally want to “shut down the Inauguration”…
“We are planning to shut down the inauguration, that’s the short of it,” he says. “We’re pretty literal about that, we are trying to create citywide paralysis on a level that I don’t think has been seen in D.C. before. We’re trying to shut down pretty much every ingress into the city as well as every checkpoint around the actual inauguration parade route.”
If Carrefour and his fellow conspirators are able to actually accomplish that, it truly would be unprecedented.
And while DisruptJ20 is not publicly advocating violence, they are not exactly discouraging it either…
Carrefour says DisruptJ20 has no publicly announced plans to jump barricades along the inauguration parade route or throw projectiles at the new president, but that autonomous direct actions are encouraged.
“I can’t comment on specific stuff we’re doing like that, mostly because that would be illegal. But, yeah, it will get pretty crazy, I expect,” he says. “‘Have fun!’ I say.”
After the rioting that we have seen in Baltimore, Ferguson, Charlotte and many other communities around the nation in recent years, I hope that authorities are taking these threats quite seriously.
Once Donald Trump won the election, many conservatives seemed to think that the war was won.  But the truth of the matter is that many on the left were completely blindsided by Trump’s surprise victory, and now that they are fully awake they are gearing up for battle like never before.
And these protests are not going to end on January 20th.  In fact, abortion advocates are hoping to get close to a million women into Washington D.C. on the day following the Inauguration to protest for abortion rights.  Filmmaker Michael Moore is hoping that this march will be the beginning of “100 days of resistance” against Trump’s presidency…
Filmmaker and liberal icon Michael Moore has announced his plans to attend the Women’s March on Washington to protest Donald Trump’s inauguration later this month and has called for sore loser liberals to go further — by staging protests acts of resistance through the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency.
In an appearance, this weekend on MSNBC’s The Last Word, the 62-year-old Trumpland and Fahrenheit 9/11 director made a “call to arms” to those opposed to Trump’s presidency to join the Women’s March on Washington scheduled for January 21, the day after the presidential inauguration.
“It’s important that everybody go there,” Moore told MSNBC’s Ari Melber.
Of course it is easy to imagine how all of this could spiral wildly out of control.  If Trump cracks down on these protests really hard in an attempt to restore law and order, that could end up sparking a dramatic backlash against his “police state tactics”.  And if the protests become even bigger and more violent, Trump could respond by cracking down even more harshly.
Let us hope for some really cold weather in D.C. at the end of January so that as many troublemakers as possible get discouraged and stay home.  Violent protests, blockades and riots aren’t going to solve anything, and they could easily open fresh wounds in a nation that is becoming more divided with each passing day.


SOROS CEMENTING CONTROL OVER EUROPE'S LEFT

 Soros Cementing Control Over Europe's Left
SOROS CEMENTING CONTROL OVER EUROPE'S LEFT 
 Globalist trying to stop anti-EU populism
BY WAYNE MADSEN
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Global hedge fund tycoon George Soros, recognizing that growing numbers of European voters are turning away from the corporate-controlled “social democratic” parties, is reining in so-called “left” parties in order to cement his control over parties, including SYRIZA in Greece and Five Star in Italy, that threaten the cohesiveness of the European Union.
When SYRIZA in Greece was able to form a government after the repeated electoral failures of the establishment corporate conservative and social democratic, Soros and his American National Endowment for Democracy (NED) moved in to exercise control over SYRIZA leaders.
The first thing the previously Euro-skeptical SYRIZA leader Alexis Tsipras did when he became prime minister in 2015 was to embrace the EU-directed draconian austerity measures that swept him into office in the first place.
 The first clue that Tsipras and SYRIZA would sell out to the EU bankers and the Soros-funded globalist interests in Europe was his choice of former Brookings Institution fellow, the Greco-Australian Yanis Varoufakis, as finance minister.

Varoufakis, a Soros plant, immediately set out to work out agreements with his fellow EU finance minister, as well as with the Euro-bankers.
To ensure that SYRIZA’s leftists could be held in check, Tsipras was forced to conclude a coalition agreement with the Independent Greeks, a breakaway party from the conservative and pro-EU/pro-NATO New Democracy party.
With SYRIZA’s bona fide leftists outraged by Tsipras’s selling out to the EU and bankers, his coalition partners, the Left Platform and the Internationalist Workers Left faction, bolted from SYRIZA to form Popular Unity.
The Greek Communist Party and Popular Unity serve as the only true leftist bulwark against the Soros schemers in the rest of Greek leftist politics.
After Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi lost his December 4, 2016, referendum to limit the power of Italy’s regional governments and curb the power of the Italian Senate, the Sorosites in Italy became alarmed that Italy was becoming another loose cog in the EU machinery.
Renzi’s government resigned as a result of the “No” vote, which was likened to the BREXIT vote in the United Kingdom to leave the EU.
The leading Italian Euro-skeptic party is the Five Star Movement (M5S) of Italian comedian Beppe Grillo.
Five Star formed a Euro-skeptic bloc in the European Parliament with Britain’s UK Independence Party (UKIP), for which Nigel Farage is the leading spokesman.
Moreover, Five Star politicians campaigned against Renzi’s referendum.
Soros, working from behind the scenes in New York and London, engineered a coup over this past weekend.
Grillo was convinced to abandon his alliance with UKIP and offer to join the European Parliament’s extremely pro-EU bloc — the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE).
The leader of ALDE is one of Farage’s oratory sparring partners in the parliament, the boyish-looking former Belgian prime minister Guy Verhofstadt.
After the BREXIT vote, Verhofstadt, an uncompromising European federalist, was named the EU’s chief BREXIT negotiator, a move intended to make the UK’s withdrawal from the EU as financially and politically painful as possible for the country.
Grillo showed the world his puppet strings to Soros when he announced that the Five Star Movement and ALDE shared a “common vision” for European unity.
The shift in Five Star’s political leanings from anti-EU to pro-EU was a political bombshell that will weaken the opposition to the EU within Italy.
And that has been Soros’s plan all along.
There was one major glitch for Five Star and Grillo.
ALDE refused to permit Five Star to join its parliamentary bloc.
However, the damage was done. The anti-EU Five Star, which has wrested control of the mayors’ offices of Rome and Turin, had been exposed as a Soros front.
It can be expected that Five Star’s embrace of the EU will result in a split in the party.
Two leading members of Five Star, Giovanni Favia and Federica Salsi, were expelled by Grillo after they questioned his fascist tendencies to make all the decisions without input from other party disciples.
Many former Five Star officials concluded that the party was nothing more than a cult following for Grillo.
But for Soros, such cultist movements are fodder for his operations, as previously seen with the loyal cult followers of Tsipras and Varoufakis in Greece.