THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
ORLANDO, Fla. — Former Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio, who is currently running for re-election in the Senate, told evangelicals on Friday that to love their homosexual neighbor, they “must abandon a spirit of judgment.”
Rubio, a Roman Catholic, made his remarks on Friday during an event hosted by the Rediscovering God in America Renewal Project in Orlando. He reiterated his belief that marriage should only be defined as the union of a man and a woman, but said that Christians shouldn’t be so hard on those who identify as homosexual.
“To love our neighbors in the LGBT community, we should recognize that even as we stand firm in the belief that marriage is the union between one man and one woman, there are those in that community and in same-sex relationships whose love for one another is real, and who feel angry and humiliated that the law did not recognize their relationship as a marriage,” Rubio said.
“To love our neighbors, we must recognize that many have experienced sometimes severe condemnation and judgment from some Christians,” he continued. “They have heard some say that the reason God will bring condemnation on America is because of them. As if somehow, God was willing to put up with adultery and gluttony, and greed and pride, but now, this is the last straw.”
Rubio said that loving homosexuals means to stop judging them.
“To love our neighbors, we must abandon a spirit of judgment. Do not judge or you will be judged. For in the same way you judge others you will be judged. And with a measure you use it will be used to measure you. And we should remember not to ignore the plank in our own eye,” he stated, citing text from Matthew 7.
“I want to be clear with you: Abandoning judgment and loving our LGBT neighbors is not a betrayal of what the Bible teaches. It is a fulfillment of it,” Rubio declared. “Jesus showed us that we do not have to endorse what people do in order to accept them for who they are—children of a loving and a merciful God.”
He pointed to how Jesus pardoned the woman caught in adultery, and said that some homosexuals “deeply desire to come to Christ, but they do not because they fear they will be shunned and rejected by some.”
“If any of us, myself included, in any way, have ever made anyone feel that Christianity wants nothing to do with them, then I believe deeply that we have failed deeply to represent our Lord Jesus Christ who time and again went out of his way to reach out to the marginalized and to the forgotten of his time,” Rubio said.
But others have stated that while Christians should certainly not be demeaning toward homosexuals, it is not love to leave a person in their sin. Love is sharing the gospel with the lost and helping to turn them from darkness to light.
“We don’t have to be unkind to them or hateful or smearing—I don’t think that’s the right approach—but we do have to be steadfast in our doctrine and in our belief when it comes to their practice,” Dr. Paul Michael Raymond, pastor of Reformed Bible Church and professor at New Geneva Christian Leadership Academy in Appomattox, Virginia told Christian News Network in a separate report.
“We out-and-out say, ‘No, I’m sorry, this is against God’s law and I pray that you see the error of your ways,’ but we cannot have real intimate fellowship with [them] or tolerate sin,’” he said.
“What is love? How is it defined?” Raymond asked. “If you really love me, you will not let me continue in a path of destruction. You will do everything within your power to keep me out of the evil way.”
He provided an example of love between a parent and a child.
“If I have a child, and that child is getting ready to run out into traffic, I am going to do everything within my power to protect that child,” Raymond said.
TURN UP THE VOLUME IF YOU THINK IT IS WORTH LISTENING TO:
Show me a church that’s in communion with Rome, and I’ll show you a church that isn’t in communion with Christ –Me
As we approach the year 2017, the 500th anniversary year of the Protestant Reformation, when Martin Luther nailed his famous work, Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, also known as the 95 Theses, to the door of the church in Wittenberg, a dark cloud looms overhead. Ever since the mass exodus of Bible-believing Christians from the death grips of the Roman Catholic power structure over matters of doctrinal issues deemed to be damning to the souls of its adherents, Rome has countered with a tenacious pursuit to reverse the separation of good and evil. Through its quest for ecumenical unification under the authority of the pope, many have resisted–but not all.
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. – Colossians 2:8
While the adherents to Martin Luther’s theology seem like they would be the last to cave under such measures, an unlikely candidate has risen to take the lead. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) has just passed a nearly unanimous vote resolving that Lutherans and Catholics no longer have any “dividing issues” regarding the church, ministry, and the Eucharist. The document titled The Declaration of the Way, contains 32 statements of agreement between the two organizations. While the document explores some of the differences between the two churches, it still allows the two to be in communion with each other. In other words, they believe each other to be true Christian brothers and sisters.
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! – Isaiah 5:20
This ‘Declaration on the Way’ helps us to realize more fully our unity in Christ with our Catholic partners, but it also serves to embolden our commitment to unity with all Christians.
There is a protective immunity clause in the document, however, that insulates them from criticism. On page 19, in the Ordination clause, the Holy Spirit is “invoked,” and it is affirmed that Roman Catholics and Lutherans who, through prayer and laying on of hands, ordain ministers, they receive the anointing of the Holy Spirit. Touch not thy anointed…right?
Many once sound churches and denominations have fallen victim to the ecumenical movement of Rome. They have capitulated to the lies and the deceit of the many councils said to soften their stance against their “separated brethren.” But the fact is, the Roman Catholic church still anathematizes any who refuse to believe their damning doctrine of salvation by works.
If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema.
Canon 12 says,
If any one shall say that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in the divine mercy pardoning sins for Christ’s sake, or that it is that confidence alone by which we are justified…let him be accursed
Canon 14 says,
If any one saith, that man is truly absolved from his sins and justified, because that he assuredly believed himself absolved and justified; or, that no one is truly justified but he who believes himself justified; and that, by this faith alone, absolution and justification are effected; let him be anathema.
Canon 23 says,
lf any one saith, that a man once justified can sin no more, nor lose grace, and that therefore he that falls and sins was never truly justified; or, on the other hand, that he is able, during his whole life, to avoid all sins, even those that are venial, – except by a special privilege from God, as the Church holds in regard of the Blessed Virgin; let him be anathema.
This council has never been overturned. It is still fully in effect and is the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic church, of which every priest, bishop, the pope–and every confirmed member of the church must affirm and adhere to. There are no two ways about it. Roman Catholicism is diametrically opposed to the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Any church that is in communion with Rome does not understand the saving power of Grace through Jesus Christ. The Roman Catholic gospel is a false gospel of works, through the sacraments, according to the traditions of the church and man. The true Gospel, as affirmed by Martin Luther and the Protestants is a Gospel of Grace alone, through Faith alone, in Christ alone, according to the Scriptures alone, for the glory of God alone.
If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting,11 for whoever greets him takes part in his wicked works. – 2 John 1:10-11
Hillary Clinton’s campaign has launched the "My Dream, Your Vote" campaign to reach 730 thousand “young people” brought here illegally. The group, known as “dreamers” were shielded with executive order from deportation and allowed them to work legally in 2012. Peter Sutherland, former Goldman Sachs chair, now head of the United Nations Migrant Council says he will under mind western culture with enhanced migrant mobility. Locals in Calais, France are warned that the out of control migrant population. Migrants largely housed in a make shift town called “the jungle” are welding bats and knives, and are smashing car windows as the owners sit in traffic. Here in the U.S., Black Lives Matter rioters are caught on camera saying "Beat Whites" on streets of Milwaukee. In the wake of mass protests, arson and riots following the police shooting of Sylville Smith.
RIGGED ELECTIONS
Published on Aug 18, 2016
Roger Stone verbalizes a fear that Republican nominee Donald Trump has expressed: Election Rigging. Stone, who penned an article for "The Hill" says election theft through the manipulation of the computerized voting machines, is possible. Stone goes on to site examples of when this has happened, as many states use a particularly machine: the DIEBOLD/PES voting machine.
SYMANTEC WARNING
HACKING THE VOTING MACHINES
Published on Aug 12, 2016
Two of the major voting machine manufacturers - Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital - are Clinton Donors. This CBS video shows how easy they are to hack. How convenient!
TRUMP IS RIGHT, ELECTION CAN BE RIGGED AND VOTE FRAUD IS REAL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Kelleigh Nelson
August 17, 2016
NewsWithViews.com
It is a sign of the times that the absence of meaningful ID requirements in many states leaves our voting process vulnerable to fraud and allows legal votes to be cancelled out by illegally cast ballots. —Virgil Goode
It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. —Joseph Stalin
Remember the Deal
Oh yes, there have been multiple stories about how the machines can be manipulated. Votes can be misrecorded, boxes stuffed, destruction or invalidation of ballots, hardware and software tampered with...there's dozens of ways to cheat the public and destroy a candidate chosen by the people.
And then there are double deals. That's where Republican Howard Baker got together with Democrat Robert Byrd, and Baker's sellout is still haunting America! See my previous article, Voter Fraud, Thank Howard Baker.
In 1982, Republican Senator Howard Baker of Tennessee, entered into an agreement with Democrat and former Klansman, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia. The agreement they made, in effect, barred Republicans from pursuing suspected cases of voter fraud without first getting a federal court’s approval. This agreement is good until December 1, 2017. I highly doubt that some leader won’t extend this insane arrangement for another 35 years.
Take note! Fortunately, this agreement does not bind GOP state committees.
Nehlen v. Ryan Primary
Absolutely voter fraud does exist. Look at the recent primary in Wisconsin where Paul Nehlen was leading at 49% to Ryan’s 41%. Paul Ryan had tanked! Yet, we end up with Paul Ryan again, and with 76% of the vote. Something is definitely rotten in Denmark! Here is the Wisconsin approved voting equipment.
Businessman Paul Nehlen may have been swamped by House Speaker Paul Ryan, and perhaps voter fraud, in a Republican primary last week, but he's not done with politics just yet. The 47-year-old will now serve as chairman of a new political action committee supporting GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.
I think we all know, that in this day and age, a computer can do anything. These voter machines are essentially a computer. Who is to say they could not be rigged?” asked Roger Stone on the topic of voter fraud.
“There’s a mathematician called Richard Charnin, a very eccentric fellow. Last time I met him he was wearing a ski jacket in 90-degree weather, he’s one of those. He’s also brilliant.”
“He’s a retired mathematician and he’s a genius. He’s written an extensive monograph on how every election in the state of Wisconsin (think Nehlen v. Ryan) in the last decade has been stolen, and you figure this out by comparing the polling, on a district by district basis, to the results, and then you’ll find a swing that is mathematically impossible,” Stone claimed. “In other words, you were losing a given precinct by four points, and then you’ll win it by twelve. Such a swing is unlikely to say the least.”
“The elections are rigged for one entity or another. So, who are the perpetrators? The perpetrators are the people who manufacture and sell these machines. The most common electronic voting machine, which is really just a computer, is a company called Diebold,” Stone replied.
“Diebold’s top executives and owners of the company are major donors to the Bush’s. Is this a major factor on how George W. Bush quite improbably beat John Kerry?”
“I think we have widespread voter fraud, but the first thing that Trump needs to do is begin talking about it constantly,” Stone said. “He needs to say for example, ‘I am leading in Florida. The polls all show it. If I lose Florida, we will know that there’s voter fraud. If there’s voter fraud, this election will be illegitimate, the election of the winner will be illegitimate, we will have a constitutional crisis, widespread civil disobedience, and the government will no longer be the government.’”
“If you can’t have an honest election, nothing else counts,” he continued. “I think he’s gotta put them on notice that their inauguration will be a rhetorical, and when I mean civil disobedience, not violence, but it will be a bloodbath. The government will be shut down if they attempt to steal this and swear Hillary in. No, we will not stand for it. We will not stand for it.”
A ragtag group of obsessive tech experts is warning that stealing the ultimate prize—victory on Nov. 8—would be child’s play in the article, How to Hack an Election in Seven Minutes.
We know there will be a strong attempt to steal this election. As we’ve seen with both parties in this race, they are determined to keep the globalists in power, and will use any means to do just that. The following eight-minute video clarifies how very easily an election can be stolen. I strongly urge you to watch it.
OR
Diebold accused this gentleman of foolishness, and apparent negligence, insisting that only authorized persons should test their systems for security. They said that the hack was equivalent to leaving your car unlocked, with the windows down and the keys left in the ignition.
However, scientists at Berkeley University confirmed the findings on this video. In fact, they discovered 16 further security flaws in Diebold’s touch screen machines. Diebold claims they’ve updated their software to make it even more secure. They also insist that their electronic voting systems are more accurate than their predecessors. But we must ask, “Why can votes be altered without leaving a trace?”
Donald Trump's campaign is seeking to recruit "election observers" following the Republican nominee's repeated claims that the general election is "rigged."
In a move that's unprecedented in a presidential election, the campaign late this week launched a page on its website proclaiming, "Help Me Stop Crooked Hillary from Rigging This Election! Please fill out this form to receive more information about becoming a volunteer Trump Election Observer."
Unfortunately, what Mr. Trump doesn’t understand is that most of the fraud is perpetrated by the voting machines themselves, and he had better be talking about it.
Despite many groups like True the vote, Judicial Watch, Defend the Vote, Show ID to Vote, and many others who work to allow only registered legal voters into the voting booths, these groups do nothing to validate that the machines are not programmed to spew out false results. The worst culprit machines are Diebold, and Diebold controls 40% of America’s precincts, and again, they are major donors to the globalist Bush’s.
Election observers are fine, but how do they know anything about the inner workings of the machines, and who has programmed them? In the documentary, Hacking Democracy, which I strongly urge everyone to watch, it shows how easily it is for programmers to put malicious software into the computer that adds up the votes. Unfortunately, we do not have anyone who actually checks the validity of the very computers who tally our votes. How do we know the votes are even counted correctly by that same computer? This documentary states:
Inside the voting machine, there is not a person taking dictation as to our votes, but there are lots of people involved in writing the software, and lots of people who could have touched the software before it went into the machine. If one of those people put something malicious in the software, and it’s distributed to all the machines, then that one person could be responsible for the change of tens of thousands of votes, maybe even hundreds of thousands across the country. That’s a very dangerous situation.
It is a secret how these voting machines actually work. The companies that make them keep it a secret. None of the computer scientists felt they could even look at the code, because the code was supposed to be a secret. The certification labs who examine it keep their process a secret of what they do. Even the election officials who buy the equipment are prohibited by their contract from ever looking to see how it works.
Conclusion
Proving our votes can be stolen without a trace culminates in a duel between Diebold voting machines and a computer hacker from Finland—with America's democracy at stake. "Hacking Democracy" has been broadcast many times on HBO, exposing the dangers of the voting machines used in America's mid-term and presidential elections. Electronic voting machines count almost 100% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections. The Diebold voting machines and their hackable software are still used today in twenty-seven states. The security holes and complete lack of transparency still pose an extraordinary risk to US elections.
Election officials need to be more demanding of the vendors as to the technical specifications of this equipment. The vendors are driving the process of voting technology in the United States. It would be far better if citizens were to select technology that satisfies their needs.
Unfortunately, Donald J. Trump can hire thousands of observers for each polling place, but they will never see the real fraud being perpetrated by the very machines which count the votes.
It is up to all of us to flood the polls this November, and to constantly talk about the fraud which has been proven over and over again with these Diebold machines. As always, our politicians will do nothing. We simply must demand that citizens select the technology we want, and without computerized machines, and it is mandatory that Trump supporters get to the polls in droves.
Roger Stone’s best advice, “The single best thing that the Trump people can do is to register a million new voters in the ten swing States. What I would do is take the margin by which Romney lost, double it. That would be my target for new registration.”
Drug companies that have donated to Hillary Clinton’s foundation received most of the contract money from an international tuberculosis initiative after the foundation was brought on to manage the initiative’s procurement operation, public records show.
Two of every three dollars spent acquiring anti-tuberculosis drugs through the program, which is administered by the World Bank, have gone to two companies—Swiss health care giant Novartis and Indian drug company Lupin Ltd.—that together have donated up to $130,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
Clinton and her allies have pointed to the foundation’s international charitable work to deflect allegations of cronyism. However, the millions of dollars in contracts awarded to the two drug companies illustrate how foundation donors profited from laudable causes.
“The Clinton Foundation is providing technical support to the program through the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), focusing on anti-TB drug procurement, markets, and quality, particularly multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) drugs,” the World Bank wrote in a 2013 report.
Another section of the report said the Clinton Foundation worked on “anti-TB drug quality and pricing.”
The World Bank collaborated with the Clinton Foundation from “2006 to date,” the report said. The project focused on reducing the incidence of TB in India, where the disease kills hundreds of thousands of people each year.
The project, dubbed the Second National Tuberculosis Control Project (SNTCP), is financed by the World Bank’s International Development Association, which receives the bulk of its funding from the United States, Britain, Japan, and Germany.
An online database of procurement data for the SNTCP lists 23 contracts totaling more than $39 million for TB drugs awarded between 2007 and 2012.
Lupin received eight of those contracts, worth nearly $20 million. Novartis’s Indian arm got a $2.2 million contract while its generic drug subsidiary, Sandoz Ltd., was awarded a contract worth nearly $6 million.
The Clinton Foundation’s website lists both companies as donors. Novartis has given between $51,000 and $105,000 while Lupin has donated between $10,000 and $25,000.
The website does not disclose when the companies made those contributions. A foundation spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. The Clinton campaign also did not return a request for comment.
The two companies and their subsidiaries received about 68 percent of all money awarded to SNTCP contractors for TB drug procurement, according to the World Bank’s website.
The website says that Novartis India’s contract and six of Lupin’s contracts were awarded through a competitive bidding process. Sandoz’s contract and two of Lupin’s contracts were subject to “limited international bidding.”
Clinton has pointed to her foundation’s work in promoting access to pharmaceuticals in the developing world as an example of its laudatory humanitarian mission.
However, critics have noted how beneficiaries of other foundation-backed pharmaceutical access programs have made large financial contributions to the group. Companies that received funds from the foundation to provide low-cost HIV drugs, for instance, were donors to the foundation.
In many cases, the same companies were also lobbying the State Department for lucrative international health contracts while Clinton was secretary of state.
Despite years of collaboration with the industry, Clinton has described pharmaceutical companies as her “enemies,” even as lobbyists for the industry bankroll her presidential campaign.
A Secret Service source has told Infowars that Hillary Clinton has major neurological health problems and that a big announcement regarding her medical situation is coming soon.
The Secret Service source reached out to Infowars reporter Joe Biggs during the recent Republican National Convention in Cleveland and confirmed the following information;
– Hillary has a very serious neurological degeneration which could be Parkinson’s disease;
– Around half a million dollars has been spent to specially adapt three SUVs in which Hillary travels to provide lowered floors and disabled access to prevent Hillary from tripping.
– Hillary’s staff is so intent on keeping reporters away from Clinton because she is at risk of petit mal seizures that can be triggered by camera flashes;
– Hillary has major problems with balance, difficulties with walking and keeps falling down;
– Hillary’s campaign will be forced into making a big announcement soon regarding her medical condition;
– The source told us that this information was relayed to the press by others, but they were too afraid to run it, so Infowars was reached out to directly by the Secret Service in Cleveland three weeks ago because they trusted us to run this news unfiltered.
The revelations correlate with other information provided by federal agents and police officers who have worked security at Hillary events.
John Cardillo, a former officer who provided VIP security details for the New York Police Department (NYPD), said he was told by a federal agent and another NYPD officer who worked security at Hillary events that Hillary had major heath problems and was often dizzy and disoriented.
Questions about Hillary’s health are intensifying following the release of our viral video which asked why Clinton has been behaving strangely in recent weeks and months.
Despite leftist media outlets attempting to portray the entire issue as a baseless “conspiracy theory,” a Rasmussen poll released last week found that 59% of Americans would like to see the Clinton campaign release Hillary’s medical records.
Watch the clip below in which Alex Jones discusses the revelations made by the Secret Service whistle blower.
A political website is offering a $1 million dollar bounty for a whistle blower to leak Hillary Clinton’s medical records.
After promising a $50,000 dollar reward for Clinton’s health history, TruePundit.com has now upped its offer to a cool million.
“As calls for Clinton to release her own records have been ignored and even laughed off by her pompous campaign, True Pundit is now offering an unprecedented reward of $1 Million (One Million Dollars US) for Clinton’s true medical records,” states the website.
The website claims it has assembled a group of individual donors who are willing to put up the money to encourage the release of the records.
“A million dollars can buy you safety. It gives a would-be whistle blower some ease,” asserts the Philadelphia-based outfit.
Questions over the presidential candidate’s health came under focus again yesterday after Clinton almost fell over after giving a speech in Scranton, Pennsylvania, forcing Joe Biden to hold her arm.
It was also revealed that an exhausted Hillary is taking off most weekends despite being in the midst of a political dogfight with Donald Trump.
Suspicions over Hillary’s health have been swirling all year but they picked up again at the start of the month after our viral video spotlighted Clinton’s bizarre behavior while taking questions from reporters and at the DNC.
Whether the $1 million bounty is serious or merely a ploy for web traffic remains to be seen – it’s probably the latter – but the offer at least serves to illustrate the intense interest in Hillary’s health despite the best efforts of the establishment media to dismiss the entire issue as a conspiracy theory.
As we documented, the media obsessed over John McCain’s health back in 2008, forcing the Arizona Senator to release his medical history, but the pro-Clinton press claims that questions over Hillary’s health in 2016 are merely part of the right-wing noise machine.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Reports, speculations, rumors abound concerning the health of Hillary Clinton. Among them: she has Parkinson’s.
Obviously, the situation would be clarified if we had access to a complete and unbiased analysis of her health and medical treatment. But how likely is that?
Meanwhile, if Hillary has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, there are drugs that are routinely prescribed, and their adverse effects should be noted.
For example, the drug L-dopa. Here, from WebMD, are several side effects that would raise serious questions: aggressive behavior; altered mental status; blood pressure drop upon standing; depression; mood changes; anxiety; confusion.
Another popular Parkinson’s drug is Sinemet. RX List mentions these adverse effects: lightheadedness; mental/mood changes; agitation; hallucinations; depression; thoughts of suicide.
With either drug, resulting depression could be treated with an SSRI antidepressant, such as Paxil. That drug also has adverse effects.
Among the side effects of Paxil listed by Drugs.com: weakness; dizziness; blurred vision; visual disturbance; lack of concentration; anxiety; confusion.
“In a May 2006 release in collaboration with the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the FDA has acknowledged the antidepressant Paxil causes a statistically significant increased rate of suicidality in depressed adults as measured in controlled clinical trials. The results are based on a re-analysis of all adult controlled clinical trials that compared Paxil with placebo. Buried in the FDA/GSK release is an astounding fact: Depressed people are 6.4 times more likely to become suicidal while taking an antidepressant than while taking a sugar pill.” [Emphasis in original]
“There has been an enduring controversy over whether psychiatric medications can trigger violent actions toward others. A review of the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System by Thomas Moore, Joseph Glenmullen and Curt Furberg, which was published by PLoS One on December 15 [2010], found that such ‘adverse events’ are indeed associated with antidepressants and several other types of psychotropic medications.”
Note: Sudden withdrawal from antidepressants can trigger quite severe and dangerous adverse effects.
As I wrote at the top, we need a detailed, clear, and unbiased report on Hillary Clinton’s health and medical treatment. But in the absence of such an assessment, it’s necessary to lay out possibilities, which is what I’m doing here. And those possibilities are sobering, to say the least, when you contemplate Hillary occupying the Oval Office as President and Commander in Chief of all US Armed Forces; and when you factor in her role, for example, in the massive attack on Libya, which reduced that nation to a sea of chaos.
Secret Service Leaks Hillary’s Deteriorating Health Info To Press
Published on Aug 14, 2016 Hillary Clinton apparently suffers from Parkinson’s or a similar disease and experiences seizures from flashing lights, such as camera flashes at press conferences, the Secret Service told Infowars. http://www.infowars.com/secret-servic...
Secret Service Agent Talks About Why Agents Are Speaking Out
Yes, Virginia, Vote Fraud Exists
