Translate

Saturday, June 18, 2016

ALEX JONES DISSECTS OBAMA'S LIES ON GUN CONTROL FOR AMERICANS, WHILE NOT BLAMING ISLAMIC JIHADISTS

RED ALERT! The REAL Agenda Behind Obama's Gun Control
Published on Jun 17, 2016
"This is the attempted take down of America". Alex Jones breaks down Obama's Call for Gun control following the Orlando Shooting. Meanwhile the Obama Administration continues to arm and fund ISIS-LINKED MILITANTS – WITHOUT BACKGROUND CHECKS!

TAKING GUNS AWAY FROM AMERICANS 
WHILE SUPPLYING ISIS WITH THEM TO INVADE AMERICA
EVERYTHING HE SAYS IS MEANT TO BRAINWASH YOU

We Need Islam Control, Not Gun Control


Ban Radical Islam, Not Guns


PAUL RYAN THREATENS TO SUE DONALD TRUMP IF HE TRIES TO ENACT TEMPORARY BAN ON MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

ANOTHER MUSLIM SYCOPHANT 
LIKE SOUTHERN BAPTIST RUSSELL MOORE
"GOOD CATHOLIC"/ "INVERTEBRATE" 
PAUL RYAN THREATENS SUIT 
TO DEFEND MUSLIMS
paul-ryan
"Obama also played the “American Values Card,” claiming that moves to limit Muslim immigration or single out Muslims in America as a threat “betrays the very values America stands for.” This was echoed by Republican House speaker and treasonous invertebrate Paul Ryan, who said Tuesday, “I do not think a Muslim ban is in our country’s interest.”
These positions are in keeping with the agenda of international socialist elites in government who have been facilitating Islamic militancy in order to destabilize their nations and necessitate draconian policies in the interest of public safety. In short, their efforts are calculated to bring about a police state. The dogged efforts of the Obama administration in blaming the access Americans have to firearms for this violence is a clear indicator of that strategy. One can only imagine the kind of nation we will have when guns become scarce, Americans are at the mercy of murderous Muslims, and law enforcement is loath to intercede over political correctness – but the prospect is chilling to say the very least."
PAUL RYAN THREATENS TO SUE DONALD TRUMP IF HE TRIES TO ENACT TEMPORARY BAN ON MUSLIM IMMIGRATION 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/paul-ryan-threatens-to-sue-donald-trump-if-he-tries-to-enact-temporary-ban-on-muslim-immigrationrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Paul Ryan and the Republican establishment seem determined to do two things: to elect Hillary Clinton President of the United States this November, and to make sure that nothing impedes the huge influx of Muslim migrants into the U.S.
Yet San Bernardino shooter Tashfeen Malik had passed five separate background checks from five separate US government agencies. Ahmad al-Mohammed and one other of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered Europe as refugees. In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. And the Lebanese Education Minister said in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country.
Meanwhile, 80% of migrants who have come to Europe claiming to be fleeing the war in Syria aren’t really from Syria at all. So why are they claiming to be Syrian and streaming into Europe, and now the U.S. as well? An Islamic State operative gave the answer when he boasted in September 2015, shortly after the migrant influx began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic State jihadis had already entered Europe. He explained their purpose: “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.” These Muslims were going to Europe in the service of that caliphate: “They are going like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he smiled and said, “Just wait.”
Paul Ryan doesn’t care. He only cares that the bipartisan politically correct establishment retains its power.
“Paul Ryan says he might sue Donald Trump if he tried to enact the Muslim ban,” by Allan Smith, Business Insider, June 17, 2016:
Paul Ryan considers Donald Trump’s proposal to indefinitely ban Muslim immigration into the US to be executive overreach.
And during an interview with The Huffington Post, uploaded on Friday, the House speaker said he’d “sue any president that exceeds his or her powers.”
Ryan, who said Trump supported the separation of powers when the speaker endorsed the presumptive Republican nominee, released part of his agenda regarding executive overreach this week.
However, Ryan is not totally sure if Trump enacting a ban on Muslims entering the country would be outside of presidential authority.
“That’s a legal question that there’s a good debate about,” Ryan said, pointing to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. That act was meant to exclude immigrants from certain countries from coming to the US in the aftermath of World War II.
On Monday, Trump made the appeal that he could legally enact such a ban as president.
“The immigration laws of the United States give the president powers to suspend entry into the country of any class of persons,” he said at a rally. “I will suspend immigration from areas of the world where there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe or our allies, until we fully understand how to end these threats.”…

U.S. SENATE VOTES TO REQUIRE WOMEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT

U.S. SENATE VOTES TO REQUIRE WOMEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT
BY TIM BROWN
SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/us-senate-votes-to-require-women-to-register-for-the-draft/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

As I have written about previously, the draft by the central government of the united States of America is not only unconstitutional, but it is morally and biblically a violation of the freedom and liberty that the men and women of this country possess. Yet, the US Senate has recently voted to demand that women register for the draft.
The New York Times reports:
On Tuesday, the Senate approved an expansive military policy bill that would for the first time require young women to register for the draft. The shift, while fiercely opposed by some conservative lawmakers and interest groups, had surprisingly broad support among Republican leaders and women in both parties.
The United States has not used the draft since 1973 during the Vietnam War. But the impact of such a shift, reflecting the evolving role of women in the armed services, would likely be profound.
 Under the Senate bill passed on Tuesday, women turning 18 on or after Jan. 1, 2018, would be forced to register for Selective Service, as men must do now. Failure to register could result in the loss of various forms of federal aid, including Pell grants, a penalty that men already face. Because the policy would not apply to women who turned 18 before 2018, it would not affect current aid arrangements.
"The fact is," said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, "every single leader in this country, both men and women, members of the military leadership, believe that it's fair since we opened up all aspects of the military to women that they would also be registering for Selective Services."
Sadly, many men and women have abandoned the biblical principles our nation was first founded upon, namely the differences and roles of men and women. While the Supreme Court ruled in 1981 that women did not have to register for the draft so that they would not have to face the same requirements as men, the Obama administration has been advancing an assault on women since Defense Secretary Ashton Carter would open combat jobs to woman.
Here's the root problem in this particular issue: the drafting of men into military service is wrong. It's doubly wrong to draft women. It's even worse when the central government is doing it to support unconstitutional wars, which they have been doing following World War II.
"It's my personal view, every American who's physically qualified should register for the draft," said General Robert B. Neller, commandant of the Marine Corp.
Well, we appreciate the treasonous general's "personal view," but the Constitution specifically states in the Thirteenth Amendment:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
This would include the illegal and immoral draft for both men and women.
The Bible is also clear about what god considers moral with regards to an army.
When Israel went to war, here were the stipulations that God put down for those who would engage in battle. The come from Deuteronomy 20.
"When you go out to battle against your enemies, and see horses and chariots and people more numerous than you, do not be afraid of them; for the Lord your God is with you, who brought you up from the land of Egypt.  So it shall be, when you are on the verge of battle, that the priest shall approach and speak to the people.  And he shall say to them, 'Hear, O Israel:  Today you are on the verge of battle with your enemies.  Do not let your heart faint, do not be afraid, and do not tremble or be terrified because of them; for the Lord is He who goes with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you." Deut. 20:1-4
The next section points out those who should return home rather than be a part of the militia.
"Then the officers shall speak to the people, saying, 'What man is there who has built a new house and has not dedicated it?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man dedicate it.  And also what man is there who has planted a vineyard and has not eaten of it?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man eat of it.  And what man is there who is betrothed to a woman and has not married her?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man marry her.'" Deut. 20:5-7
It even includes those who are cowards.
"The officers shall speak further to the people and say, 'What man is there who is fearful and fainthearted?  Let him go and return to his house, lest the heart of his brethren faint like his heart.'  And so it shall be, when the officers have finished speaking to the people, that they shall make captains of the armies to lead the people." Deut. 20:8-9
The pretended law that requires men to sign up for the draft in clear violation of the Constitution has been upheld by the Supreme Court in 1981. This is par for a Supreme Court that has shown itself to be unconstitutional in its rulings time and again.
The issue here is really based on a free society, not one that enslaves its citizens for a war machine.

OBAMA HIRES RACIST MUSLIM WOMAN LAILA ALAWA FOR DHS RIGHT AFTER ORLANDO MASSACRE

OBAMA HIRES RACIST 

LAILA ALAWA

Muslim who said 9/11 “changed the world for good” is on Homeland Security Advisory Council

BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
How by any stretch of anyone’s imagination can Laila Alawa be seen as someone who cares in the slightest degree about “homeland security”? She is quite obviously on the other side, and if we had a sane political and media culture, her presence on the DHS Advisory Council would be a major scandal.
“Syrian Immigrant Who Said 9/11 ‘Changed The World For Good’ Is A Homeland Security Adviser,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, June 13, 2016:
One of the sitting members on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism is a 25-year-old immigrant of Syrian heritage who said that the 9/11 attacks “changed the world for good” and has consistently disparaged America, free speech and white people on social media.
Laila Alawa was one of just 15 people tapped to serve on the newly-formed HSAC Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism in 2015 — the same year she became an American citizen. Just last week, the subcommittee submitted a report to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, recommending that the DHS avoid using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism. 
Alawa says she immigrated into the U.S. when she was ten years old. Her family had already left Syria by the time she was born. “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria,” she wrote in November 2015, calling the country her “homeland.”
In 2014, Alawa commemorated the September 11 attacks by tweeting that “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.”
Exactly a year later, she claimed that, after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.”
In April 2013, she responded to a tweet from activist Pamela Geller who called the Boston Marathon bombings “jihad” by tweeting: “go fuck yourself.”
On September 21 — the day after Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the U.S. would accept 85,000 Syrian refugees in 2016 and 100,000 more in 2017 — Alawa mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”
In the Countering Violent Extremism report published last week, Alawa and her fellow subcommittee members recommended that the Department of Homeland Security “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.”
The report also recommended that, in order to combat violent extremism, the DHS “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”
As originally reported by The Daily Caller, the subcommittee Alawa serves on instructed the DHS to begin “using American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism in order to avoid offending Muslims.
Two months before Secretary Johnson created the Subcommittee on Combatting Violent Extremism, Alawa tweeted: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.”
She has previously indicated her belief that only “idiots” believe that “America is the best nation in the world.”
In September 2014, a week after saying that “9/11 changed the world for good,” Alawa said that “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.”
Alawa is outspoken in her belief that “Islamophobic” rhetoric shouldn’t be allowed.
“We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful ish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she tweeted.
Less than two weeks after the Boston Bombings, Alawa tweeted: “You can’t say something intolerant and not expect consequences. Not on my watch.” In April 2015, Alawa asked: “How the hell is the shit @PamelaGeller is spewing ‘free speech’? it’s straight up warmongering hate speech. It’s xenophobia.’”…
______________________________________________________________________ 

Racist advises Homeland Security on relations with Islam

BY MARTIN BARILLAS
SEE: http://www.speroforum.com/a/PWNUZHYUIE27/78205-Racist-advises-Homeland-Security-on-relations-with-Islamrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Laila Alawa, who sat on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism, once wrote that 9/11 terrorist attacks “changed the world for good. I just hope we keep having open conversations about our differences.” A week afterwards, according to the Daily Caller, she said, “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.” The 24-year-old Muslim woman has variously denounced the United States, the right to free speech and white people. She emigrated to the United States as a pre-teen.
Not long before Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson created the Subcommittee, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote on Twitter: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.” For Alawa, only “idiots” still believe that “America is the best nation in the world.” 
Alawa is one of 15 people who serve the HSAC Subcommittee, which was established by the Obama administration in 2015. It was that year that Alawa became a citizen of the United States. Recently, the subcommittee submitted a report to Secretary Johnson that recommended that it cease using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism. Alawa says she has never been actually employed by the Department of Homeland Security. She is founder of The Tempest, a website that bills itself as a mouthpiece for "millenial" young women. A recent article written by Alawa is entitled, "I used to pee when I laughed: this changed everything."
Besides the Homeland Security Advisory Council, DHS has a "Countering Violent Extremism Task Force" which also advises Secretary Johnson. The two bodies are distinct.
Alawa’s ethnic and religious roots are deep. Despite her American citizenship, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote in November 2015 “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria.”
She commemorated the deadly 9/11 attacks in 2014 with a post on Twitter, saying:  “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.” Then, a year later, she claimed that after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.” When activist Pamela Geller labeled the Boston Marathon bombings as “jihad,” Alawa responded on Twitter: “go f--k yourself.”
Alawa further revealed her racial animosity on September 21 of last year when Secretary of State John Kerry announced that America will take in 185,000 Syrian refugees, when she mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”
In their report to DHS Sec. Johnson, Alawa joined her fellow subcommittee members to recommend that Homeland Security should “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.” Moving on, the Report on Countering Extremism recommended that DHS should “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”
In a 2014 tweet, Alawa wrote that while 9/11 was "horrific," Muslim American's "pain" has made them into survivors.
DHS should not offend Muslims, the subcommittee wrote, which called on DHS to use “American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism.
Moreover, Alawa wants to ban “Islamophobic” speech. “We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful rubbish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she wrote. 
In an interview with Spero News, Attorney Jennifer R. Breedon said that groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim Brotherhood seek to squelch freedom of speech in order to advance Islamic political goals such as shariah.

HOMELAND SECURITY: "GUN CONTROL NOW NATIONAL SECURITY"~CENSORS WORDS "JIHAD", "SHARIA"~OBAMA HIRES RACIST MUSLIM WOMAN WHO HATES WHITES, LOVES 9/11

Homeland Security Chief Claims Gun Control 

is Now “National Security”

BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/23431-homeland-security-chief-claims-gun-control-is-now-national-securityrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

They really are coming for your guns. They really do think you are stupid. And if they get their way, all they will have to do to disarm you is have a bureaucrat put your name on a secret government list. Even while importing huge numbers of Islamic immigrants from countries illegally bombed and destroyed by the Obama administration and its allies, Obama's secretary of homeland security now claims Americans must submit to much more gun control — this time, for “national security” reasons. One of the key demands being pushed is that Americans be deprived of their constitutionally protected gun rights based of a bureaucrat's secret “suspicion,” without even a semblance of due process of law. Supporters of actual national security and the Constitution, though, are speaking out against the Obama administration's dangerous attacks on fundamental liberties.
In an soft-ball interview with CBS, a leading media apologist for the Obama administration and its attacks on liberty, Homeland Security boss Jeh Johnson (shown) leveled a full-blown attack at the U.S. Constitution and the God-given rights enshrined in it. “We have to face the fact that meaningful, responsible gun control has to be part of homeland security as well, given the prospect of homegrown, home-born violent extremism in this country,” Johnson claimed on the "CBS This Morning" program after the terror attack in Orlando, presumably with his armed taxpayer-funded security nearby. “We need to do something to minimize the opportunity for terrorists to get a gun in this country, and this is now something that is critical to homeland security as well as public safety.” That something includes open attacks on fundamental rights.  
However, it was unclear why a person willing to violate terrorism and murder laws would be expected by the administration to obey gun-control regulations. Also not made clear was why or how gun control would stop terrorists from acquiring guns any better than it has in the past, here or in other nations. As illustrated horrifically late last year, in fact, gun control does not prevent terrorists from getting guns; it just leaves victims disarmed. The deadly Islamist terrorist attacks in Paris, France, for example, which resulted in more than 500 casualties, were conducted with banned AK-47s. Defenseless citizens, meanwhile, disarmed by some of the most draconian gun control in the world and unable to defend themselves from the gun-wielding attackers, were left to cower and beg for mercy.    
The precise scope of the gun control sought by Johnson and the administration was not made clear in the interview. However, among other demands, the “Homeland Security” boss called for Americans to be stripped of their constitutionally protected rights without even a semblance of due process of law. The traditional method of revoking somebody's rights in America has always been criminal charges, followed by either a guilty plea or a jury trial and conviction in a court of law. Johnson, however, suggested it was time for that to change. Under his vision, if a government bureaucrat claims to be suspicious of somebody and puts them on a secret “watch list,” that person would be automatically stripped of their constitutionally protected rights. Ironically, some U.S. lawmakers, including the late anti-gun extremist Senator Ted Kennedy who was stopped from boarding a plane, have faced problems due to the infamous secret “watch” lists.   
Certain lawmakers were also pushing for such a scheme. U.S. Senator Christopher Murphy, a far-left Democrat from Connecticut, spent 15 hours blabbering about the need for more infringements on the right to keep and bear arms, due process rights, and more. Apparently it was an effort, potentially stage-managed for public consumption with liberal Republicans, to get Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to defy his previous pledges and the wishes of his constituents to allow a vote on more gun control. In particular, they seek to forcibly disarm people that bureaucrats secretly identify as suspicious in some way, in a closed process that nobody understands. “Amazing that U.S. senators would filibuster in favor of using secret lists, like some authoritarian regime, to deny rights without due process,” commented Representative Justin Amash (R-Mich,), a leading defender of the Constitution and liberty in Congress.
In a message posted on Twitter about the issue, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump did not state a position about denying gun rights to people on secret government lists compiled by out-of-control bureaucracies. “I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns,” Trump said, sparking outrage both among followers who suspected the candidate was considering the scheme, and opponents who viewed the candidate as pro-Second Amendment. Clinton, by contrast, has become a full-blown supporter of denying rights without due process, despite criticism even from some of her allies on the left. Establishment talking heads such as pseudo-conservative Bill O'Reilly joined Clinton on the bandwagon.     
Of course, the idea being pushed by exploiting the attack in Orlando is totalitarian to the core. It is also flatly unconstitutional. The Fifth Amendment, for instance, declares that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Due process, obviously, includes the rights to a jury trial, to confront one's accuser, to present evidence, and more. However, in the age of Obama, due process has been trampled like never before. In fact, today, the Obama administration makes the outlandish claim that it can even execute people around the world without so much as charging them with a crime — something that once would have been immediately identified and prosecuted as murder. Americans can be sure that, once gun rights can be denied based on secret lists, other rights will inevitably follow, as even far-left anti-gun commentators have pointed out.  
While the public is being led to believe the “suspicious” people whose rights will be removed without due process are Islamic extremists, there is much more to the story. Consider the fact that the administration has already made abundantly clear, on numerous occasions, that it considers everyday Americans with mainstream political views — views shared by hundreds of millions of people — to be potential terrorists. Among those who have appeared in official government documents listed as extremists and possible terrorists are pro-life activists, returning veterans, opponents of illegal immigrationliberty lovers, Ron Paul supporters, gun-rights supportersanimal-rights activists, hardcore environmentalistsevangelical Christians, Catholics, Orthodox Jews, and more.    
And alleged “right-wing extremists,” with the terms largely undefined, are in the cross-hairs like never before, with top Obama officials arguing that they are apparently just as dangerous as ISIS. Earlier this year, speaking at a Homeland Security Advisory Council meeting, member and Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo “reminded the Council that the threat from right-wing extremists domestically is just as real as the threat from Islamic extremism,” according to the official meeting minutes, with another member adding that “online sites in right wing extremist communities” were important. “Secretary Johnson agreed and noted that CVE [the Subcommittee on Combating Violent Extremism], by definition, is not focused solely on one religion.” Indeed, the Obama administration appointed a prominent Muslim Brotherhood operative as a Homeland Security adviser. The administration also launched a domestic terror unit that will target Christians and conservatives.   
And there is more to come. Homeland Security boss Johnson claimed in the CBS interview that Obama was “frustrated” by the resistance to his gun-control agenda, but was “determined” to keep pushing. “I thought frankly after Sandy Hook where you have schoolchildren murdered in a classroom that maybe finally this will be the tipping point and we were not able to move the needle in Congress, unfortunately,” Johnson said, sounding disappointed that the effort to exploit dead children for political gain had failed. Ironically, though, Obama's divisive rhetoric threatening the Second Amendment has, as usual, sparked a surge in gun sales, with AR-15s and other weapons flying off the shelves. The trend is so serious that more than a few analysts have referred to Obama as the “world's greatest gun salesman.” The dictator-dominated United Nations also called for “robust gun control” after the attack.
Ironically, perhaps, in light of Johnson's comments, the Islamist accused of massacring people at a homosexual nightclub in Orlando was actually employed by a Homeland Security contractor. Known as G4S, the gigantic “security” company is deeply involved in the Obama department's “illegal alien catch and release” program, in which illegal aliens from countries other than Mexico are caught at the southern border, then reportedly driven north and dropped off in the U.S. interior without so much as paperwork. The threat to national security posed by the DHS program, and others like it, including the release of tens or even hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens with criminal records, is hard to overstate. But as usual, the establishment media and the political class hope to exploit the dangers they have unleashed and the tragedies they enabled to attack your fundamental rights.
Traditionally, as stated clearly in the Second Amendment, a well-armed populace and militia were considered essential to the security of a free state. Under Obama, however, the tables have been flipped. Now, disarming Americans is proclaimed to be essential for national security, supposedly due to the unprecedented influx of Islamic immigrants brought in in recent years who might become radicalized. In truth, however, widespread gun ownership has been shown to reduce violent crime, stop mass shootings, prevent or minimize terror attacks, and more. It also makes the prospect of foreign invasion sound ludicrous — with many tens of millions of Americans armed with hundreds of millions of guns, no military or combination of militaries in the world could hope to subjugate the American people using ground forces. Plus, a mass shooting attack such as the one that occurred in Paris, leaving hundreds of casualties, would be inconceivable in America outside of gun-free zones such as the Orlando nightclub that was attacked.
The Second Amendment is national security. It is also the supreme law of the land. Anyone who says otherwise has no business pretending to serve the American people in government.
Related articles:
_____________________________________________________

DHS Secretary Sees All Americans As a Threat: “Gun Control Has To Be a Part of Homeland Security”

Flags, firearms and incendiary conversations on social media have given ’cause’ to a government that is out of control and only wants a population that is ready to turn in its guns and be afraid of what the media tells them, not a population that is ready to challenge the unconstitutional actions of its government.

BY MAC SLAVO
SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/dhs-secretary-sees-all-americans-as-a-threat-gun-control-has-to-be-a-part-of-homeland-security/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The agency’s source of power has always been fear.
And now is the time to capitalize upon it.
Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson has seized upon the Orlando shooting and is… rather predictably… using the specter of terrorism as a pretext for instituting gun control on a wider scale. (Of course, he isn’t alone.)
Secretary Johnson told CBS News that:
Just days after the massacre in an Orlando nightclub left 49 people dead and 53 wounded, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on Tuesday said that gun control is now a critical element of protecting the U.S. homeland and keeping Americans safe.
“We have to face the fact that meaningful gun control has to be a part of homeland security,” Johnson said in an interview on “CBS This Morning.” “We need to do something to minimize the opportunity for terrorists to get a gun in this country.”
[…]
“I thought frankly after Sandy Hook where you have schoolchildren murdered in a classroom that maybe finally this will be the tipping point and we were not able to move the needle in Congress, unfortunately,” Johnson said.
It seems Jeh Johnson thought Sandy Hook would be all that was necessary to reign in gun rights. For him, it is all part of ‘public safety.’
But apparently, the powers-that-be will wait for a bigger and bigger tragedy until something too big to ignore happens, then they can push for their un-American agenda with the opposition pinned down and the rest of the population too afraid to think.
Maybe the Orlando mass murder is that event.
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson: Passing gun control is now ‘part and parcel of homeland security’
Though quieter than than it has been under past heads, Homeland Security has clearly maintained the twisted view that all Americans are potential terrorists, and that a preemptive police state, complete with surveillance, data mining and social profile trolling is necessary in order to maintain relative peace.
This attitude is noted in recent meetings of the Homeland Security Advisory Committee, discussing in part its community partnership program for Countering Violent Extremism (CVE):
“Secretary Johnson said there is much left to accomplish in this final year of the Administration… Counterterrorism remains a cornerstone mission of the Department. There is a new environment when it comes to the global terrorism threat, which includes not only terrorist-directed attacks, but terrorist-inspired attacks. These threats call for a whole-of-government response, including military, law enforcement, and robust intelligence gathering and sharing efforts. These efforts extend to the private sector as well, and DHS is very active in this arena.”
It is clear that so-called “right-wing extremists” are still a leading concern for Homeland Security and the federal government agencies.
via Breitbart
One month after the San Bernardino terrorist attack that left 14 innocent people dead, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told advisors that right wing extremists pose just as much of a threat to the country as Islamic extremists.
Johnson made the comments during the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) January meeting. City of Austin Mayor Art Acevedo, whom Johnson appointed to HSACshifted the discussion to the threat of right-wing extremists, according to the official meeting minutes.
“Member Acevedo reminded the Council that the threat from right-wing extremists domestically is just as real as the threat from Islamic extremism,” the minutes state.
“Secretary Johnson agreed and noted that CVE, by definition, is not solely focused on one religion. Member Goldenberg seconded Member Acevedo’s remarks and noted the importance of online sites in right wing extremist communities, not only in America but worldwide.”
Against all logic, the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration and the borders in addition to law enforcement and national security issues, has vowed to ‘give voice to the plight’ of Muslims, rather than focusing on keep out radical and potentially violent members of that group – essentially welcoming another attack.
Instead, ordinary Americans, including those with dissident political views of any kind, are typically regarded as potential threats under Homeland Security watch lists.
Flags, firearms and incendiary conversations on social media have given ’cause’ to a government that is out of control and only wants a population that is ready to turn in its guns and be afraid of what the media tells them, not a population that is ready to challenge the unconstitutional actions of its government.
Changes are coming. Keep your eyes open and encourage those around you to stand up for their rights.
_____________________________________________________

ISIS Propaganda

ABOVE: An ISIS propaganda shows Omar Mateen who killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, with 'Islamic State' blazoned behind him / AP

Homeland Security Report Calls for Rejecting Terms ‘Jihad,’ ’Sharia’

DHS to target millennials in countering Islamist recruitment

BY BILL GERTZ
SEE: http://freebeacon.com/national-security/homeland-security-report-calls-rejecting-terms-jihad-sharia/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A new Department of Homeland Security report urges rejecting use of Islamic terms such as “jihad” and “sharia” in programs aimed at countering terrorist radicalization among American youth.
The Homeland Security Advisory Council report recommends that the department focus on American milliennials by allocating up to $100 million in new funding. It also urges greater private sector cooperation, including with Muslim communities, to counter what is described as a “new generation of threats to the Homeland related to the threat of violent extremism.”
The funds would be used for hiring experts and new social media programs and technology to influence young people not to join terror groups.
“The department’s CVE efforts are an attempt to protect our nation’s young people from extremists who prey upon the Millennial generation,” the report says.
“The department must reframe the conversation to reflect this reality and design a robust program around the protection of our youth, which must include predator awareness and an understanding of radicalization. In doing so, our citizens will be better equipped for this threat.”
Under the section on terminology, the report calls for rejecting use of an “us versus them” mentality by shunning Islamic language in “Countering Violent Extremism” programs, or CVE, the Obama administration’s euphemism that seeks to avoid references to Islam.
Under a section on recommended actions on terminology, the report says DHS should “reject religiously-charged terminology and problematic positioning by using plain meaning American English.”
Government agencies should employ “American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir’ or ‘umma,’” states the June 2016 report by the Council’s countering violent extremism subcommittee.
Jihad is the Islamic concept of holy war that is the primary call to arms for Islamic terrorist groups around the world, including the Islamic State, al Qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Sharia law is the anti-democratic Islamic supremacist legal code that critics say has prevented U.S. Muslims from assimilating into American society. Takfir is the Arabic term for apostasy, and umma is the word used to describe the entire Muslim community.
The DHS report stated that to avoid a confrontational “us versus them” stance in public efforts to counter Islamic radicalization, government programs should use the term “American Muslim” instead of “Muslim American.”
The limits on counter terrorism terminology outlined in the report are the latest sign of verbal censorship within government imposed by President Obama. The president this week launched into an angry public denunciation of Republican critics of his policy of avoiding use of the expression “radical Islam.”
Obama sought to deny charges that political correctness was behind the policy of not linking Islamic terrorism to its religious roots, and dismissed those who favor highlighting the links as a Republican political ploy.
The comments prompted a backlash from counter terrorism experts who say that failing to publicly link Islamic terrorism to its religious tenets makes it more difficult to counter jihadist ideology.
The terrorist attack Sunday in Orlando was carried out by a radical Muslim, Omar Mateen, who declared loyalty to ISIS during the rampage that killed 49 people at a gay nightclub on Sunday. The FBI said Mateen was “radicalized” through the Internet.
President Obama’s program to counter ISIS came under fire from CIA Director John Brennan during a Senate hearing Thursday.
Some gains are being made in taking back territory controlled by ISIS and limiting its finances, according to Brennan.
“Unfortunately, despite all of our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach,” he said.
“The resources needed for terrorism are very modest, and the group would have to suffer even heavier losses on territory, manpower, and money for its terrorist capacity to decline significantly.”
The DHS report said the average age for foreign fighters joining ISIS is 26, with the Internet “playing a primary or contributing role” in radicalization.
Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kansas) a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, criticized the DHS language restrictions.
“The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Interim Report makes the dangerous recommendation that the Obama administration continue to deny the threat that radical Islamic terrorism poses,” Pompeo said.
“Jihadists are the ones who have made this fight ‘us vs. them’ with every violent terrorist attack—from bringing down the World Trade Center towers, killing American soldiers overseas, beheading journalists, or shooting Americans in Orlando,” he added. “DHS’s emphasis here on political correctness is absolutely dangerous and places America and our military at risk.”
In the Senate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) said the administration’s failure to properly address radical Islam has made the country less safe.
“Over and over again, we have seen the Obama administration having ample information to stop a terrorist attack, and yet because of the political correctness, because of the ideology of this administration that won’t even say the word ’jihad,’ won’t even say the words ’radical Islamic terrorism,’ they look the other way and the attacks go forward,” Cruz said in a Senate floor speech Thursday.
Sebastian Gorka, a counter terrorism expert, said that banning the jihadist terminology is similar to “Newspeak,” the fictional language used for totalitarian control in George Orwell’s book 1984.
“This is simply outrageous from the perspective of national security,” said Gorka, the Horner chair of military theory at Marine Corps University.
“Banning words that our political elite don’t like is not only a contravention of the First Amendment, it directly endangers the lives of Americans,” he added.
“When the enemy that slaughters our citizens in Orlando, San Bernardino, and Boston calls themselves ‘jihadis’ no one, not even the president, has the right to censor that reality and give them another name.”
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official now with the American Enterprise Institute, said the report’s concerns about terminology are hindering counter terrorism efforts.
“If the Obama team and DHS used half the effort they expend debating vocabulary actually advancing strategies to stymie and defeat enemies, America would be safer,” he said.
The report also recommends using former terrorists in “programming and messaging” efforts, including “far right, anti-government, and other extremists groups.” The report also mentions white supremacist, sovereign citizen, and anarchist groups as posing a terror threat but makes no mention of left-wing extremist groups.
The report also calls for a focus on “gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.” The gender focus was not further explained.
On the use of social media, “the department must fully understand and leverage social media in its policy and programmatic activities,” the report said.
America’s children, the report says, will grow up in a world of expanding human ingenuity and knowledge. “As that process of human evolution, including the expansion of freedom and liberties across the globe proceeds, our government must remain vigilant, adapt, and evolve to protect them,” the report concludes, adding that “we must do so by demonstrating faith in the American people, in their government, and we must be confident in the power of America’s ideas.”
A DHS spokeswoman had no immediate comment.
Farah Pandith, a Council on Foreign Relations fellow, and chairman of the panel that produced the report, did not return emails seeking comment.
_______________________________________________________

OBAMA HIRES RACIST 

LAILA ALAWA

Muslim who said 9/11 “changed the world for good” is on Homeland Security Advisory Council

BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

How by any stretch of anyone’s imagination can Laila Alawa be seen as someone who cares in the slightest degree about “homeland security”? She is quite obviously on the other side, and if we had a sane political and media culture, her presence on the DHS Advisory Council would be a major scandal.
“Syrian Immigrant Who Said 9/11 ‘Changed The World For Good’ Is A Homeland Security Adviser,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, June 13, 2016:
One of the sitting members on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism is a 25-year-old immigrant of Syrian heritage who said that the 9/11 attacks “changed the world for good” and has consistently disparaged America, free speech and white people on social media.
Laila Alawa was one of just 15 people tapped to serve on the newly-formed HSAC Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism in 2015 — the same year she became an American citizen. Just last week, the subcommittee submitted a report to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, recommending that the DHS avoid using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism.
Alawa says she immigrated into the U.S. when she was ten years old. Her family had already left Syria by the time she was born. “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria,” she wrote in November 2015, calling the country her “homeland.”
In 2014, Alawa commemorated the September 11 attacks by tweeting that “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.”
Exactly a year later, she claimed that, after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.”
In April 2013, she responded to a tweet from activist Pamela Geller who called the Boston Marathon bombings “jihad” by tweeting: “go fuck yourself.”
On September 21 — the day after Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the U.S. would accept 85,000 Syrian refugees in 2016 and 100,000 more in 2017 — Alawa mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”
In the Countering Violent Extremism report published last week, Alawa and her fellow subcommittee members recommended that the Department of Homeland Security “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.”
The report also recommended that, in order to combat violent extremism, the DHS “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”
As originally reported by The Daily Caller, the subcommittee Alawa serves on instructed the DHS to begin “using American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism in order to avoid offending Muslims.
Two months before Secretary Johnson created the Subcommittee on Combatting Violent Extremism, Alawa tweeted: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.”
She has previously indicated her belief that only “idiots” believe that “America is the best nation in the world.”
In September 2014, a week after saying that “9/11 changed the world for good,” Alawa said that “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.”
Alawa is outspoken in her belief that “Islamophobic” rhetoric shouldn’t be allowed.
“We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful ish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she tweeted.
Less than two weeks after the Boston Bombings, Alawa tweeted: “You can’t say something intolerant and not expect consequences. Not on my watch.” In April 2015, Alawa asked: “How the hell is the shit @PamelaGeller is spewing ‘free speech’? it’s straight up warmongering hate speech. It’s xenophobia.’”…
______________________________________________________________________ 

Racist advises Homeland Security on relations with Islam

BY MARTIN BARILLAS
SEE: http://www.speroforum.com/a/PWNUZHYUIE27/78205-Racist-advises-Homeland-Security-on-relations-with-Islamrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Laila Alawa, who sat on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism, once wrote that 9/11 terrorist attacks “changed the world for good. I just hope we keep having open conversations about our differences.” A week afterwards, according to the Daily Caller, she said, “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.” The 24-year-old Muslim woman has variously denounced the United States, the right to free speech and white people. She emigrated to the United States as a pre-teen.
Not long before Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson created the Subcommittee, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote on Twitter: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.” For Alawa, only “idiots” still believe that “America is the best nation in the world.” 
Alawa is one of 15 people who serve the HSAC Subcommittee, which was established by the Obama administration in 2015. It was that year that Alawa became a citizen of the United States. Recently, the subcommittee submitted a report to Secretary Johnson that recommended that it cease using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism. Alawa says she has never been actually employed by the Department of Homeland Security. She is founder of The Tempest, a website that bills itself as a mouthpiece for "millenial" young women. A recent article written by Alawa is entitled, "I used to pee when I laughed: this changed everything."
Besides the Homeland Security Advisory Council, DHS has a "Countering Violent Extremism Task Force" which also advises Secretary Johnson. The two bodies are distinct.
Alawa’s ethnic and religious roots are deep. Despite her American citizenship, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote in November 2015 “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria.”
She commemorated the deadly 9/11 attacks in 2014 with a post on Twitter, saying:  “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.” Then, a year later, she claimed that after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.” When activist Pamela Geller labeled the Boston Marathon bombings as “jihad,” Alawa responded on Twitter: “go f--k yourself.”
Alawa further revealed her racial animosity on September 21 of last year when Secretary of State John Kerry announced that America will take in 185,000 Syrian refugees, when she mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”
In their report to DHS Sec. Johnson, Alawa joined her fellow subcommittee members to recommend that Homeland Security should “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.” Moving on, the Report on Countering Extremism recommended that DHS should “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”
In a 2014 tweet, Alawa wrote that while 9/11 was "horrific," Muslim American's "pain" has made them into survivors.
DHS should not offend Muslims, the subcommittee wrote, which called on DHS to use “American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism.
Moreover, Alawa wants to ban “Islamophobic” speech. “We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful rubbish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she wrote. 
In an interview with Spero News, Attorney Jennifer R. Breedon said that groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim Brotherhood seek to squelch freedom of speech in order to advance Islamic political goals such as shariah.