Translate

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO CORTEZ'S DIRTY MONEY MACHINE

REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO CORTEZ'S 
DIRTY MONEY MACHINE
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/273051/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-dirty-money-machine-daniel-greenfieldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Cortez-Chakrabarti story is starting to get more interesting. First there were a few puffs of smoke, then more puffs and now a whole lot of smoke.
Two political action committees founded by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s top aide funneled over $1 million in political donations into two of his own private companies, according to a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission on Monday.
Campaign finance attorneys described the arrangement as “really weird” and an indication "there’s something amiss." They said there was no way of telling where the political donations went — meaning they could have been pocketed or used by the company to pay for off-the-books campaign operations.
Doppelganger LLC versions of the PACs soaked up a lot of the money from the PACs. And that's where the trial ends.
In 2017, Brand New Congress PAC transferred another $240,000 to Brand New Congress LLC, also for "strategic consulting." Another PAC co-founded by Chakrabarti that year called "Justice Democrats" transferred an additional $605,000 to Brand New Congress LLC in 2017.
Chakrabarti was a Bernie Sanders person and the Sanders campaign was notorious for all sorts of shady money issues. As is Bernie Sanders, whose Sanders Institute employs his own family, and it could have been a clumsy effort by a political novice to siphon funds.
Or, it could be something more sophisticated. And there might be a whole network moving lefty money around.
That said, I wouldn't count on consequences. Obama, Bernie and Hillary all got away with shady campaign finance stuff. Worst comes to worst, the Dems will sacrifice Chakrabarti and bring in one of their own vets to be Cortez's new political puppeteer. 
______________________________________________________________

Ocasio-Cortez Faces Five Years in Prison for FEC Crimes



HEARING LOSS? BUYER BEWARE!: DISCREDITED LIBERAL SOCIALIST-GLOBALIST "POCAHONTAS" ELIZABETH WARREN'S "HEARING AID" BILL PROVES SHE'S A CRONY CAPITALIST

Elizabeth Warren's bipartisan hearing aids bill is a deceptive ruse, using FDA to fool the gullible and line the pockets of big companies
HEARING LOSS? BUYER BEWARE!: 
DISCREDITED LIBERAL SOCIALIST-GLOBALIST "POCAHONTAS" 
ELIZABETH WARREN'S "HEARING AID" BILL PROVES SHE'S A CRONY CAPITALIST 

Proposed legislation rewards campaign contributors like Bose by labeling their amplifiers as medical devices

BY  | 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Elizabeth Warren: progressive stalwart or crony capitalist?
Warren’s latest bill to increase the FDA’s regulatory power over hearing aids for millions of Americans is the latest indicator of her true crony capitalist intentions.
Warren introduced the Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017 in March, which, on the surface, sounds great. I mean, who wouldn’t want to increase access to medical devices for seniors?
The problem is that these aren’t even medical devices; they’re sound amplifiers that are already available over the counter for anyone to buy. Under the guise of increasing access to over-the-counter hearing aids for seniors, Warren cleverly paved the way for her big donors to sell personal sound amplification products (PSAPs) as hearing aids.
These devices are commonly used to amplify sounds for outdoor and indoor activities, and are more closely related to headphones than to hearing aids. Big donors such as Bose, which is headquartered in her home state of Massachusetts, spent no less than $50,000 this year lobbying Warren and other legislators to have the FDA reclassify these devices as ‘hearing aids,’ when they are anything but.
Warren’s bill opens a whole new market for these speaker companies, allowing them to re-brand their products as medical devices subject to FDA regulation. In doing so, they trick the consumer into thinking they’re getting a solution to a problem that affects nearly half of seniors, when it can often have the exact opposite effect.
True hearing aids are medical devices and should be treated as such. Most people wouldn’t just pop a random pair of prescription lenses on and walk out of the store. An individual with common sense would go to a physician for an eye exam, and then get fitted for lenses there. Why should we treat hearing devices any differently?
The bill’s first sentence leaves no ambiguity as to its intended effect, which is “to provide for the regulation of over-the-counter hearing aids.” Make no mistake, this is a ploy by industry giants to unfairly increase their profits at the expense of seniors.
The House version of the bill recently passed, and was conveniently packaged into an FDA user fee bill. Hopes of stopping this bill now lie with the Senate, where Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), and Susan Collins (R-Maine) have vowed to reform it.
With its history of decreased safety, higher prices, and lack of innovation, the FDA is the last agency that should be given more power over the American consumer. We should be decreasing the power the FDA has to regulate hearing devices, not increasing it. The worst part is that some Republican senators, as well as a bipartisan group of House members, have signed on to this crony capitalist bill.
Warren’s bill is typical of big government bureaucrats, who sell the idea of increased consumer access to consolidate their own power. This bill is not simply against free-market principles: It will hurt the very people it is designed to help.
Peter Van Voorhis is a conservative activist, commentator, and journalist. He is a weekly contributor to iHeartRadio’s PowerTalk 96.7FM.
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

WHAT APOLOGY?: REP. ILHAN OMAR ACCUSES JEWISH CONGRESS WOMAN OF WANTING HER TO HAVE DUAL LOYALTY TO ISRAEL~TLAIB'S JEW HATE PROBLEM GROWS TOO

REP. ILHAN OMAR ACCUSES JEWISH CONGRESS WOMAN OF WANTING HER TO HAVE DUAL LOYALTY TO ISRAEL 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/rep-ilhan-omar-accuses-jewish-congresswoman-of-wanting-her-to-have-dual-loyalty-to-israelrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar just can’t seem to stop making antisemitic statements. She is a devout believer in Islam, and the Qur’an demonizes the Jews in numerous ways. It depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
The chances that Ilhan Omar will continue to make antisemitic statements are 100%. So will she be removed from the Foreign Affairs Committee and repudiated in other ways? Or will Democrats circle the wagons, defend her, and thereby continue to normalize antisemitism? The latter is more likely.
“Omar Doubles Down On Anti-Semitism, Accuses Jewish Congresswoman Of Wanting Her To Have Dual Loyalty To Israel,” by Ryan Saavedra, Daily Wire, March 3, 2019:
Embattled Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) ignited another firestorm on Sunday when she made anti-Semitic comments to a Jewish member of Congress, accusing the congresswoman of wanting her to have dual loyalties to Israel.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), who is Jewish and the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, condemned Omar on Friday for anti-Semitic remarks she made last week, calling her comments “vile,” “anti-Semitic,” “outrageous,” and “deeply hurtful.”
On Sunday, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), who is also Jewish, also called out Omar for her anti-Semitic remarks from last week, tweeting: “Lawmakers must be able to debate w/o prejudice or bigotry. I am saddened that Rep. Omar continues to mischaracterize support for Israel. I urge her to retract this statement and engage in further dialogue with the Jewish community on why these comments are so hurtful.”
Omar responded: “Our democracy is built on debate, Congresswoman! I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee. The people of the 5th elected me to serve their interest. I am sure we agree on that!”
In essence, what Omar is saying is that she believes Jewish people expect her to have dual loyalties to Israel.
“I have not mischaracterized our relationship with Israel, I have questioned it and that has been clear from my end,” Omar falsely claimed.
Omar later falsely claimed: “I have not said anything about the loyalty of others, but spoke about the loyalty expected of me. There is the difference.”…
Omar’s latest round of anti-Semitic remarks drew a lot of criticism from notable figures in the media and in politics:
“Someone please write ‘Antisemitism for Dummies,”’ Bret Stephens tweeted. “Nobody expects @IlhanMN to pledge ‘allegiance’ to Israel. But her attacks on pro-Israel Americans of doing so is a charge of dual loyalty. That is classic anti-Semitism.”…
______________________________________________________________

Rep. Ilhan Omar under fire again for 

anti-Semitic comments

Rep. Omar ignites a Twitter feud with fellow Democrat Rep. Lowey over support for Israel. Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz reacts.
 House Foreign Affair chair demands Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar apologize for “vile anti-Semitic slur”
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/house-foreign-affair-chair-demands-muslim-rep-ilhan-omar-apologize-for-vile-anti-semitic-slur

TLAIB'S JEW HATE  PROBLEM GROWS TOO
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/glazov-moment-tlaibs-jew-hate-problem-growsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, I discuss Tlaib’s Jew-Hate Problem Grows and unveil what the establishment media doesn’t want you to know about its new anti-Trump Muslim hero.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.

House Democrats draft anti-Semitism resolution

BRIGITTE GABRIEL ON OMAR & TLAIB:

Ilhan Omar has no business on the House Foreign Affairs Committee!




PATRIOT NURSE: THE FIGHT IS COMING: CIVIL WAR, CORRUPT CHURCHES & ANTIPATHY

PATRIOT NURSE: THE FIGHT IS COMING: 
CIVIL WAR, CORRUPT CHURCHES & ANTIPATHY 
In this informative video, Patriot Nurse discusses the coming civil war and the influence of communist infiltration into the American church, as well as the obvious signs of impending conflict in the United States. The Left has steadily shown that they intend to continue taking away the rights of citizens, all the while attempting to soothe and placate them with the siren song of antipathy fomented even now in the Church. Support my work via donation: Patreon: https://bit.ly/2D9IIfJ Subscribestar: https://bit.ly/2RESD4S Bitcoin: 3FxJWbSL9nFSMRgymSsicniPxTPd26Kuvj Ethereum: 0x5134d6f2700Fa21cEcE6ED1ABDE240b3B320bDDd Litecoin: MC1qkabuDXGCrjNcXwxvz5qgtsFGVpXYKF Take my CLASS: https://bit.ly/2U36EpA Episcopal church on deity gender: https://wapo.st/2GXwTeH Deuteronomy 32:4 The Rock! His work is perfect, for all His ways are just. A trustworthy God who does no wrong, righteous and just is He.
_______________________________________________________
WATCHMEN & WATCHWOMEN NEEDED:

WILLOW'S VERDICTS IN: BILL HYBELS GUILTY OF SEXUAL ABUSE & VERBAL ABUSE OF MEN & WOMEN

WILLOW'S VERDICTS IN: BILL HYBELS GUILTY OF SEXUAL ABUSE & VERBAL ABUSE OF MEN & WOMEN 
BY CHERIE VANDERMILLEN
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/03/01/willows-verdicts-in-bill-hybels-guilty-of-sexual-abuse-and-verbal-abuse-of-men-and-women/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
[Emily McFarlan Miller | Religious News Service] The allegations of “sexually inappropriate words and actions” by Bill Hybels, the founder of Willow Creek Community Church, are credible, according to an independent group of Christian leaders advising the church.
That alleged behavior, directed mostly at women connected to the Chicago-area megachurch, took place at various points during Hybels’ more than four decades of leadership.
“The credibility of the allegations would have been sufficient for Willow Creek Community Church to initiate disciplinary action if Bill Hybels had continued as pastor of the church,” according to the report by the Willow Creek Independent Advisory Group.
The group’s report was posted online Thursday (Feb. 28) by Willow Creek Community Church and the Willow Creek Association.
Hybels stepped down from his roles with both the church and association early last year after allegations of misconduct surfaced against him. He has publicly denied allegations of misconduct.
Members of the advisory group — which looked into Hybels’ role as pastor of Willow Creek and as leader of the association — included Jo Anne Lyon, general superintendent emerita of The Wesleyan Church; Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals; Margaret Diddams, provost of Wheaton College in Wheaton, Ill.; and Gary Walter, past president of the Evangelical Covenant Church.
Their investigation included interviews with Hybels and members of his family, the women who came forward with allegations against Hybels, staff who worked directly with Hybels at both the church and association and others.
Hybels was accused last year of sexual harassment and misconduct spanning decades by a number of women connected to the church in a series of news reports. He and Willow Creek initially dismissed the allegations as “lies.” They also accused former church staff and pastors of conspiring against Hybels.
After Hybels stepped down, the church’s elders admitted that he had sinned. All the church’s elders and Hybels’ successors — Heather Larson and Steve Carter — eventually resigned.
“While we cannot change the events of the past, we grieve what has happened, ask for forgiveness, and commit ourselves to pursuing healing and reconciliation,” Willow Creek’s newly installed elder board wrote in a statement on the church website.
The report concluded that Hybels also verbally and emotionally intimidated both male and female employees.
And neither the church nor the association did enough to stop him.
[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Emily McFarlan Miller and originally published at Religious News Service. Title changed by P&P.]
________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

ABORTIONIST: IF ABORTION PROCEDURE FAILS & BABY IS BORN ALIVE, "MOST LIKELY WE'D BREAK ITS NECK"

ABORTIONIST: IF ABORTION PROCEDURE FAILS & BABY IS BORN ALIVE, "MOST LIKELY WE'D BREAK ITS NECK"
BY CHERIE VANDERMILLEN
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/03/01/abortionist-if-abortion-procedure-fails-and-baby-is-born-alive-most-likely-wed-break-its-neck/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
[Michael Snyder | End Of The American Dream] What I am about to share with you is absolutely sickening.  But if we do not shine a light on these practices, they will never stop.  And once you learn what is really going on behind the scenes, you have a responsibility to help do something about it.  Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, more than 60 million children have been murdered by abortionists in America.  Future generations will not look back on this time in history with fond memories.  Instead, they will look back with horror at a generation that committed evil on an unprecedented scale.
Abortion is murder, but sometimes babies survive the abortion attempt.
So what happens to those babies that are born alive?
Well, one Planned Parenthood “doctor” in Minnesota recently admitted that if a baby is born alive, “most likely we would break the baby’s neck”
The unnamed patient shared her horrifying experience with Pro-Life Action Ministries. She was 22 weeks pregnant when she went to a Planned Parenthood in St. Paul, Minnesota for an abortion in 2017, but she said she chose life after hearing what the abortionists would do to her son.
The woman said she asked the two abortionists, “If you guys were to take him out right now while he’s still, his heart rate is still, you know, going, what would you guys do?”
She said one of the abortionists looked at the other one, then looked back at her, “and she told me that we don’t tell women this, and a lot of women don’t even ask this question, but if we was to proceed with the abortion and the baby was to come out still alive and active, most likely we would break the baby’s neck.”
I don’t even have the words to describe how sickening this is.
You can learn much more about the investigation that uncovered this right here.  We must shine a light on these absolutely wicked people, otherwise, they will just keep on killing.
Earlier this week, the U.S. Senate considered a bill that would have ended this practice, but Democrats were able to successfully block it
Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison time for doctors who don’t try saving the life of infants born alive during failed abortions, leading conservatives to wonder openly whether Democrats were embracing “infanticide” to appeal to left-wing voters.
All prominent Democratic 2020 presidential hopefuls in the Senate voted down the measure, including Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Kamala Harris of California, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. The final vote was 53-44 to end Democratic delaying tactics — seven votes short of the 60 needed.
One of the Senate Democrats that voted to block this bill could potentially become our next president.
Thankfully, we currently have a president that was supportive of the bill, and he is greatly disturbed that Democrats apparently “don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth”
In response, President Trump tweeted late Monday that “This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress.”
“Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children,” Trump wrote. “The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth.”
Following the abortion procedure, organs are usually harvested from the children and are sold off to the highest bidder.
A lot of these harvested organs end up being sold to researchers who use them in some of the strangest “scientific experiments” imaginable.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “Aborted Baby Parts Are Being Grafted On To Mice In Bizarre Scientific Experiments – And The U.S. Government Is Paying For It”.
To continue reading click here
_______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
POWERFUL: FOX HOST CRIES AS ABORTION DOCTOR DESCRIBES 
LATE TERM ABORTION- Feb 28, 2019


TRUMP PROMISES EXECUTIVE ORDER DENYING FUNDS TO ANTI-FREE SPEECH UNIVERSITIES

TRUMP PROMISES EXECUTIVE ORDER DENYING FUNDS TO ANTI-FREE SPEECH UNIVERSITIES

Students must be free to challenge “ridiculous and dangerous ideas,” Trump tells CPAC.

BY MATTHEW VADUM
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273041/trump-promises-executive-order-denying-funds-anti-matthew-vadumrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump vowed to issue an executive order protecting free speech at America’s universities Saturday as he invited Hayden Williams, a conservative victim of leftist violence on campus, to share the stage with him at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference.
“We reject oppressive speech codes, censorship, political correctness and every other attempt by the hard left to stop people from challenging ridiculous and dangerous ideas. These ideas are dangerous,” Trump said March 2 in a speech that was interrupted by chants of “USA! USA! USA!” “Instead we believe in free speech, including online and including on campus.”
“Today I’m proud to announce that I will be very soon signing an executive order requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if they want federal research grants.”
“If they want our dollars, and we give it to them by the billions, they’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak. Free speech. If they don’t, it will be very costly,” he said. “Every day we’re restoring common sense and the timeless values that unite us all. We believe in the Constitution and the rule of law.”
The president did not provide details about the upcoming executive order. Robby Soave of Reason reports that “an official with knowledge of the executive order confirmed … that a draft exists. Indeed, the plan is to penalize universities that do not protect free speech by taking away their federal grants.”
The announcement came after student leaders from a group of taxpayer-funded universities in Kentucky urged state lawmakers to approve legislation to protect free speech on campus. A letter to lawmakers was signed by 18 student leaders, including representatives of College Republicans, Young Americans for Liberty, and the Council on Post-Secondary Education. “Across the country, speech codes have been used against students of all parts of the political spectrum,” the letter states.
Williams, a field representative for the grassroots conservative training academy, the Arlington, Va.-based Leadership Institute, briefly joined Trump on the dais at CPAC in a National Harbor, Maryland hotel a few miles from the nation’s capital.
“It’s great that I’m being recognized … but there’s so many conservative students across the country who are facing discrimination, harassment, and worse if they dare to speak up on campus,” said Williams, a black eye visible on his face.
“So I’m glad that we could we could bring this to the forefront and I'd just like to say if these socialist progressives had their way they would put our Constitution through the paper shredder in a heartbeat. So it’s as important now [as] ever, the work at Leadership Institute and Campus Reform, exposing these liberal abuses to the public.”
Williams, 26, was coldcocked Feb. 19 when he was allegedly assaulted by Zachary Greenberg, 28, at the University of California, Berkeley.
At the time Williams was assisting the campus chapter of Turning Point USA at that group’s recruiting table. Turning Point strongly backs Trump. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., headlined the group’s event, “AmericaFest,” on the first night of CPAC, Feb. 28.
Although the attack was captured on video, Berkeley officials abruptly dropped an investigation into the assault and then re-opened it under pressure from conservatives who claimed officials weren’t taking the matter seriously because the victim was a conservative activist. Greenberg was arrested March 1 and charged with assault with a deadly weapon and attempting to cause great bodily injury. His bail was set at $30,000. He is scheduled to appear in court March 4, Fox News reports.
In his animated, well-received address to CPAC that lasted more than two hours –reportedly the longest of his presidency— Trump urged Williams to file suit against his attacker and the authorities.
“Sue him. But he's probably got nothing but sue him forever. But sue the college, the university, and maybe sue the state. Ladies and gentlemen, he took a hard punch in the face for all of us. Remember that. He took a punch for all of us.”
That may be good advice.
In December, UC Berkeley agreed to compensate Young America’s Foundation (YAF) and Berkeley College Republicans for trampling the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of conservative speakers and students on its campus. The Trump administration sided with campus conservatives against the school. The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest on behalf of the two groups. The department “will not stand by idly while public universities violate students’ constitutional rights,” Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand said at the time.
When conservatives had been scheduled to speak on campus, the campus administration typically didn’t forbid their appearances. Instead, it made the speeches inconvenient to the point of impossibility, for example, forcing students to use venues a mile off campus or at times when students couldn’t attend. Berkeley also often required non-leftist groups to hand over thousands of dollars to defray security costs, a requirement not rigorously or consistently imposed on left-wing speakers or groups.
An aggressive crackdown on non-leftist speech came after Berkeley officials—emboldened by a violent Antifa mob blocking a Feb. 1, 2017 campus appearance by firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos—decided to formalize viewpoint discrimination in the school’s policy on speakers.
Around that time, Trump threatened to withhold federal funds from Berkeley.
“If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?” Trump tweeted Feb. 2, 2017.
The speech, which was sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center (publisher of FrontPage), never happened. Police stood down and allowed left-wing students and activists to “no-platform” Yiannopoulos because they didn’t like his views. Demonstrators caused $100,000 in damage to the campus and several times as much damage to the surrounding town.
The continuing threat of violence by Antifa at Berkeley also led to the cancelation of a planned on-campus premiere of a documentary film this writer executive-produced, America Under Siege: Antifa, during Yiannopoulos’s planned Free Speech Week at the school.
Under the terms of the out-of-court settlement attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon reached with Berkeley, the university was to pay YAF $70,000, rescind its unconstitutional “high-profile speaker policy,” rescind its viewpoint-discriminatory security fee policy, and abolish its heckler’s veto—protesters are no longer allowed to shut down conservative expression.
Berkeley is no longer able to impose a 3:00 p.m. curfew on conservative speech. Nor is it allowed to ban advertisements for YAF-sponsored campus lectures or relegate conservative speakers to remote or inconvenient lecture halls on campus while giving leftist speakers access to preferred locations.
At CPAC, Trump praised the conservative activists in the audience.
“Young Americans like you are leading the revival of American liberty sovereignty and self-determination in the face of left-wing intolerance. The anger, the unbelievable anger. I see it every day. Fortunately for you it's mostly pointed at me. You have the courage to speak the truth. To do what is right. And to fight for what you believe and keep doing it.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

WALMART'S GAY "LOVE IS IN THE AISLE" HOOKUP VIDEO ADVERTISES THEIR PRODUCTS, BUT THE LGBTQ LIFESTYLE MORE SO

SAME SEX BLIND DATE
WALMART'S GAY "LOVE IS IN THE AISLE" VIDEO
"STARRING" PATRICK & ANDY HOOKING UP
A BETTER TITLE: "PERVERSION IS IN THE AISLE"
WILL THE BATHROOMS BE NEXT?

Walmart Releases ‘Love Is in the Aisle’ Video Depicting Two Men Meeting Up for ‘Blind Date’ at Store

BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“He’s Pat. He’s Andy. They’re going on a blind date at their local Walmart to see if love is in the aisle,” states a controversial video recently posted to social media by mega-retailer Walmart.
The Facebook post is one of three “Love Is in the Aisle” videos released by Walmart in February, which depict single shoppers meeting up to go on a blind date at the store.
“Oh my [Lord’s name in vain], you’re handsome!” Pat exclaims to Andy upon meeting him at the entrance.
The men walk through the store jokingly discussing various items, such as coconuts, cast iron pans and 3-in-1 body wash. Andy also opens a box of oatmeal cookies in the store and has Pat try one.
“You’re gonna have one of these right now,” he says. “You’re gonna eat it right up. It’s gonna be awesome.”
“This is amazing,” Pat replies after taking a bite.
At the end of the video, the two men express a mutual interest in each other.
“I don’t know why, but I like Andy,” Pat states.
“Grocery shopping is usually a chore, but Pat made it fun,” Andy remarks. “And I would very much like to go grocery shopping again with him sometime.”
The marketing effort has generated both praise and concern, with some opining that the video is “pretty cute” and others stating that the social media post is “disappointing.”
“Walmart, you may want to reconsider pushing the envelope on morals. Target has tried it with gender neutral restrooms and that hasn’t worked out well,” one commenter wrote.
Walmart commented under a number of supportive remarks, but did not reply to the complaints.
“I think it would be so awesome if during pride month all the associates wore rainbow vest or pins!” one commenter wrote. “That sure is a great idea,” Walmart responded, giving a thumbs up.
The American Family Association has now launched a petition drive, calling upon Walmart President Doug McMillon to keep the company neutral on the issue.
“Walmart’s shift away from neutrality on this controversial issue to full support for same sex relationships is something Sam Walton would never have approved of,” it reads in part. “I urge you, Mr. McMillon, to return Walmart back to its founding principles by removing the pro-homosexual video and agreeing to remain neutral on the controversial issue of homosexuality.”
As previously reported, the Bible teaches that all men are in the same predicament: All are born with the Adamic sin nature, having various inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law of God and being utterly incapable of changing themselves. It is why Jesus outlined in John 3:5-7 that men must be regenerated by the second birth, and be transformed from being in Adam to being in Christ, or they cannot see the kingdom of Heaven.
“Jesus answered and said unto him, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.’ Nicodemus saith unto him, ‘How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?’
Jesus answered, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, ‘Ye must be born again.’”
John 8:34-36 also reads, “Jesus answered them, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto you: Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house forever, but the Son abideth ever. If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.'”