Translate

Friday, July 5, 2019

TEXAS: GOVERNOR ABBOTT CRACKS DOWN ON HOMELESS CAMPING IN STREETS

“If you look at some of these, they are usually sanctuary cities run by very liberal people and the states are run by very liberal people,” Trump told Tucker Carlson Monday. “You can’t have what’s happening, where police officers are getting sick just by walking the beat. I mean, they’re getting actually very sick, where people are getting sick, where the people living there are living in hell, too.”
TEXAS: GOVERNOR ABBOTT CRACKS DOWN ON HOMELESS CAMPING IN STREETS 
Photos: Austin, Texas A Literal Shi*hole after City Imposes Homeless Ordinance

Governor promises to overturn new rules that give homeless free rein over public streets

BY ADAN SALAZAR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Over the years, Austin has struggled with one of the hardest problems facing modern-day American big cities – an overwhelming homeless crisis of epic proportions.
But the Austin City Council’s latest ordinance may be causing more problems than it’s solving, critics say.
Earlier this week, the city council de-criminalized homeless camps in public spaces.
This means transients are free to camp out on sidewalks, in front of houses and in front of businesses — and police can do little about it.
The new ordinance has led to homeless people camping in places they otherwise would not, to the detriment of Austin residents and tourists.
The new rules didn’t sit well with the Austin Police Association, which has campaigned against changes to the homeless ordinance.
In a Facebook post Monday, the police union posed a hypothetical question, along with its hypothetical answer: “People are sleeping on the sidewalk in front of my residence. This is concerning to my family. Can’t y’all do anything about that?”
“Answer: No, the new obstruction/camping ordinances allow camping on sidewalks, alleyways, and other public places (except parks and City Hall), which includes in front of your house, provided the people camping are not making the sidewalk unreasonably inconvenient or hazardous.”
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has indicated he plans to override the “reckless” city ordinance, after calling out the “insanity” it is creating.
“If Austin— or any other Texas city—permits camping on city streets it will be yet another local ordinance the State of Texas will override,” Abbott tweeted Wednesday.
President Trump in an interview with Fox News also spoke about the need to shut down “disgraceful” tent cities in Sanctuary cities run by liberals. 
________________________________________________________________
Car crash claim sparks war of words between Abbott, Mayor Adler over homelessness
Austin Mayor responds to Gov. Abbott's remarks on how to deal with the homeless

MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON EMBRACES UK'S ANTI-SEMITIC LABOUR TOP DOG JEREMY CORBYN

http://www.americansagainsthate.org/images/Keith-Ellison%27s-Dangerous-L.jpg
https://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Keith-Ellison-nation-islam-800x416.png
http://bloviatingzeppelin.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Keith-Ellison-Muslim-Influence.jpg
https://static.westernjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Louis_Farrakhan_Hassan_Rouhani_Keith_Ellison.jpg
https://usefulstooges.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/ellison_sarsour.jpg?w=444&h=333
https://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Keith_Ellison_Bernie_Sanders-1.jpg
MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON EMBRACES UK'S ANTI-SEMITIC LABOUR TOP DOG JEREMY CORBYN
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
These are two leaders of the international Left today, both steeped in irrational Jew-hatred. On the Left, that’s the “enlightened” position.
Ellison’s Jew-hatred is Islamic. The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
Where does Corbyn’s come from? An uncritical acceptance of the victimhood claims of Islamic advocacy groups in the West, as well as of the “Palestinian” propaganda that the international media routinely retails.
Awesome day in London, especially meeting with Rt. Hon. Jeremy Corbyn – a true grassroots organizer. pic.twitter.com/Jl6HhyVNxY
— Keith Ellison (@keithellison) July 2, 2019
“Keith Ellison Embraces Anti-Semitic UK Leader Jeremy Corbyn,” by Ariel Behar, Investigative Project, July 3, 2019:
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a former Democratic National Committee deputy chairman, posted a photo of himself Tuesday night with U.K. Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Corbyn’s Labour Party has been embroiled in an anti-Semitism controversy that has seen key leaders leave the party. Nearly 40 percent of British Jews said they would consider leaving the U.K. if he were to become prime minister.
Ellison, a savvy politician, has to be aware of Labour’s problems. That did not give him pause about posing with Corbyn, who has embraced terrorist organizations Hamas and Hizballah and called them his friends.
“Awesome day in London,” Ellison wrote, “especially meeting with Rt. Hon. Jeremy Corbyn – a true grassroots organizer.”
Before becoming Labour leader, Corbyn praised a re-issue of a century-old book that claims Jews control banking and the press. Corbyn wrote a foreword in the 2011 edition of J.A. Hobson’s “Imperialism: A Study.
“I am sickened that Labour is now perceived by many as a racist, anti-Semitic Party,” MP Mike Gapes wrote in a February resignation letter posted on social media. “But there has been considerable reluctance since then to seriously deal with hundreds of cases of anti-Semitism and several prominent anti-Semites have been readmitted to the Party.”
An ongoing investigation by Great Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), drew 100 witnesses, The Guardian reported.
Despite the scrutiny, “Nothing has changed,” Jewish Labour Movement Secretary Peter Mason told the newspaper. “We continue to see the same behaviour that we have seen for a very long time and no action taken to tackle it.”
Ellison, a former congressman, is also no stranger to embracing bigotry and anti-Semitism.
In 2010, Ellison promised at a private fundraiser that Israel’s influence on American foreign policy would change once more Muslims got involved in politics.
He was also forced to denounce Louis Farrakhan, a fervent Jew-hater, despite the fact that he met privately with him in 2016. Ellison had said that his ties to the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan ended in the early 1990s.
Ellison insists he’s being unfairly maligned. But he does himself no favors when, as a state attorney general, he makes a point of showing the world he’s aligned with Corbyn…
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.investigativeproject.org/7971/keith-ellison-embraces-anti-
semitic-uk-leader

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT KEITH ELLISON:

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2018/11/trevor-loudons-burn-this-

book-keith.html 

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-truth-about-keith-ellison

-muslim.html

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271629/accused-abuser-keith-ellison-

sinking-minnesota-daniel-greenfield

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2018/09/sharia-enforcer-muslim-

democrat-keith.html

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2018/06/muslim-brotherhood-linked

-former-dnc.html

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2018/01/muslim-democrat-keith-

ellison-poses.html

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/08/robert-spencer-video-house

-votes-down.html

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT CORBYN:

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/search?q=CORBYN&max-results

=20&by-date=true




NOT A NATO ALLY!: ERDOGAN MOCKS U.S., DEFIES TRUMP & CONFIRMS PURCHASE OF RUSSIAN MISSILES

ERDOGAN MOCKS U.S., DEFIES TRUMP & 
CONFIRMS PURCHASE OF RUSSIAN MISSILES
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Not a friend. Not an ally. Turkey should not be a member of NATO. The US alliance with Turkey is based on Cold War strategies that are now obsolete.
“Erdogan MOCKS US as he defies Trump to complete Russia missile purchase,” by Kumail Jaffer, Express, July 1, 2019 (thanks to Joshua):
TURKEY President Tayyip Erdogan took aim at the US after he confirmed the first delivery of Russian S-400 missiles would arrive within 10 days.
Mr Erdogan has been sparring with US President Donald Trump over the issue of S-400 missiles for a number of months. The White House’s threats have been swiftly dismissed by the Turkish President and to add insult to injury, Mr Erdogan publicly praised the Russian-made missiles, saying they were worth three times as much as a US-made Patriot missile. Following a tense meeting between the two at the G20 summit in Osaka, Mr Erdogan, in typical fashion, refused to mince his words.
The Turkish leader said: “One S-400 is worth three Patriots.
“If the conditions are even equal to the S-400 (deal), we would buy Patriots, but if they are not, then we have to think of our interests.”
The US attempted to sway Turkey by offering it Patriot missiles in place of the S-400 purchase, which Turkey agreed last year.
However, according to data compiled from the manufacturers, the S-400 appears to be far superior.
It can shoot targets travelling at twice the speed that the US-made missile can, as well being able to engage with double the targets.
Patriot missiles were also used to limited effect in the 1991 Gulf War, creating doubts over their practical use.
This will come as a huge victory for Erdogan, who, not long ago, came under immense US pressure to cancel the S-400 missile purchase.
Washington sees the S-400 missiles as incompatible with NATO systems and claims it leaves their F-35 fighter jets – which it currently supplies to Turkey – open to Russian subterfuge.
On a geopolitical level, the White House does not want to see any deepening of ties between Ankara and Moscow due to Turkey’s strategic status in the region.
As such, the US threatened to halt the F-35 programme – in which Turkey buy the jets and Washington trains Turkish pilots – and formally place sanctions on firms in the country.
However, Mr Erdogan was defiant in his actions as he believed the US would never punish its ally in the region, lest it grows ever closer to Russia as a result…
_____________________________________________________________

Lopez Moment: Erdogan’s Turkey and U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Alliance

This new Glazov Gang episode presents the Clare Lopez Moment with Clare M. Lopez, the Vice President for Research & Analysis at the Center for Security Policy.
Clare discusses Erdogan’s Turkey & U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Alliance, focusing a light on Jihadis in arms — barely a dozen miles from our nation’s capital.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account.

GOOGLE DECLARES ORGANIC TO BE "A LIE" & SUPPLEMENTS "SCAMS" IN LATEST INSANE ANTI-HEALTH SEARCH MANIPULATION

GOOGLE DECLARES ORGANIC TO BE "A LIE" & SUPPLEMENTS "SCAMS" IN LATEST INSANE ANTI-HEALTH SEARCH MANIPULATION 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Natural News) If you thought Google was only censoring political content, think again. Just like I warned in a previous Natural News article, Google is now censoring all content about organics, homeopathy, naturopathy, chiropractic, herbs, nutrition and supplements.
Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo, has put together a damning collecting of evidence proving that Google is maliciously altering search suggestions to try to destroy natural health and naturopathy. It’s all part of Google’s total collapse into pure evil that has also seen Google censoring all conservative, Christian or pro-Trump content.
Make no mistake: Google is pro-pharma, pro-Monsanto, pro-glyphosate, pro-pesticides, pro-chemotherapy, pro-fluoride, pro-5G, pro-geoengineering and fully supports every other toxic poison that endangers humankind.
Google is poison to humanity. (See EvilGoogle.news for more daily reporting.)

“ORGANIC IS A… LIE, SHAM, MYTH, WASTE OF MONEY, MARKETING GIMMICK”

Recently, a shocking discovery was made: Google is autocompleting the search fields of billions of users with false information (topics ranging from natural health to candidates for election), based not on objective search volume data, but an extremely biased political and socio-economic agenda — one that is jeopardizing the health and human rights of everyone on the planet.
On June 3rd, 2019, it was discovered that Google had scrubbed their search results clean of natural health sites, resulting in some losing as much as 99% of their traffic. Soon after, it was discovered that Google also manipulates users with their autocomplete function into thinking that natural approaches to health are fraudulent and even harmful. This is Part 2 of our ongoing series exposing these practices. Part 1 can be found here.
Google manipulates your search results in a very specific way. For instance, if you start your search out with “supplements are,” Google will autocomplete your search field with the following suggestions:

“SUPPLEMENTS ARE BAD, USELESS, NOT REGULATED, DANGEORUS, SCAMS”

Most Google users believe that its suggestions reflect the volume of searches others are doing on the topic — a reasonable assumption, given Google says their algorithm is “Based on several factors, like how often others have searched for a term.” In fact, Google goes out of their way to say they are not making subjective suggestions, but objective predictions based on real searches:
“Predictions, not suggestions – You’ll notice we call these autocomplete “predictions” rather than “suggestions,” and there’s a good reason for that. Autocomplete is designed to help people complete a search they were intending to do, not to suggest new types of searches to be performed. These are our best predictions of the query you were likely to continue entering.
How do we determine these predictions? We look at the real searches that happen on Google and show common and trending ones relevant to the characters that are entered and also related to your location and previous searches.” Source: Google
But Google Trends data show the “supplements are” autocomplete results above to be inaccurate, if not blatantly falsified. In fact, keyword search volume trend lines show that since 2004, searches for the phrase “supplements are bad” relative to “supplements are good” (in red) are far lower, and the gap continues to increase, with about 5x more people searching for them in a positive rather than negative light. This is the very definition of the Orwellian inversion: where Good becomes Bad, and War becomes Peace. 
Amazing, a third Google product from its extremely profitable Google Ads division called Keyword Planner, shows an even more accurate quantification of how many searches have actually been performed in the United States in the past month with the phrase: “supplements are bad.” The result? Only 100-1,000 searches, which is between only .2739 and 2.7 people a day.
That’s right, in the entire population of the United States (327,321,076 as of March, 26, 2018), at most 2.7 people type the phrase “supplements are bad” into the Google search engine. But if any of those 327 million people type “supplements are…” into the Google search engine, all 327 million users will have their search completed for them with the suggestion that they are “bad” and search for information on how bad they are.
In order to demonstrate that this result is not a fluke, let’s look at the search “taking vitamins…” and see what Google suggests in their autocomplete.

Example #1: “TAKING VITAMINS IS A BAD”

And what does the Google Trend data show? A null result: “Hmm, your search doesn’t have enough data to show here.”
This should not be surprising considering that the vast majority use search engines to field queries and not affirmative statements reflecting foregone conclusions. But that’s how thoroughly a very specific anti-nutritional industry political agenda is embedded within Google’s algorithm.
When we drop this phrase into Google’s keyword planner, what do we get? An astounding 0-10 people search this term every month in the U.S. In other words, no one.
We discussed the potential corrupting influence of pharmaceutical companies, with whom Google partners and receives investment, on their results in our previous article: INVESTIGATION: Google Manipulates Search Suggestions To Promote Pharma, Discredit Natural Health.
Alternative browsers like Duckduckgo, on the other hand, won’t suggest anything because it does not have an autocomplete function as google does, which google states: “is designed to help people complete a search they were intending to do, not to suggest new types of searches to be performed.
Our investigation has uncovered a number of examples like this where Google is placing autocomplete suggestions into the search user’s mind that are not only the opposite of what most people search for, but sometimes do not search for at all — indicating that Google’s ostensibly objective feature is literally a propaganda device programming users to think thoughts they would never otherwise consider.
This has profound implications, as we will explore later, as the so-called Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME) identified by researchers in 2013, is one of the most powerfully influential forces on human behavior ever discovered — so powerful, in fact, that it may have determined the outcome of one quarter of the world’s elections in recent years.
But first, let’s look at further examples of Google’s dystopian search results, such as:

Example #2: “GMOS ARE GOOD”

Example #3: “ORGANIC IS A LIE”

Example #4: “HOMEOPATHY IS FAKE..”

Example #4: “HOLISTIC MEDICINE IS FAKE..”

Example #5: “CHIROPRACTIC IS FAKE..”

Example #6: “NATUROPATHY IS FAKE…”

TRUMP TO IRAN: THREATS CAN "COME BACK TO BITE YOU"

TRUMP TO IRAN: THREATS CAN 
"COME BACK TO BITE YOU"
 Director of The Heritage Foundation's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Nile Gardiner says President Trump is sending the exact right message to the Iranian regime and the world about standing up to evil.

SALUTE TO AMERICA: PRESIDENT TRUMP'S HISTORIC LINCOLN MEMORIAL SPEECH

SALUTE TO AMERICA: 
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S HISTORIC LINCOLN MEMORIAL SPEECH
President Trump’s dream of a celebration showing off America's military capabilities will become a reality on Thursday, as the president confirmed tanks will play a role in Washington, D.C.’s Fourth of July festivities -- and the vehicles were seen being hauled in on a freight train.
An Associated Press photographer spotted the two M1A1 Abrams tanks, along with four other military vehicles, in a railyard at the southeastern edge of Washington. A military official earlier told the AP that the tanks were transported north from Fort Stewart in Georgia. This comes after the president said Monday: "We're going to have some tanks stationed outside." The vehicles include M1A1 Abrams tanks, the type currently used by American armed forces, as well as Sherman tanks, the kind commonly used during World War II, according to the president. Having tanks rolling down the streets of D.C. had raised concerns due to their weight, with the Abrams tanks weighing upwards of 60 tons each. Trump acknowledged these concerns Monday, without offering many details. "You've got to be pretty careful with the tanks because the roads have a tendency not to like to carry heavy tanks," Trump said Monday. "So we have to put them in certain areas, but we have the brand new Sherman tanks and we have the brand new Abrams tanks." The military display is all part of the “Salute to America” event that Trump is putting on this Thursday. "I'm going to say a few words and we're going to have planes going overhead, the best fighter jets in the world and other planes, too," Trump said. This includes a demonstration by the U.S. Navy Blue Angels. There will also be fireworks near the Lincoln Memorial, which is where Trump is scheduled to speak. Democrats, though, are worried that the president will turn the national event into a political rally.
_______________________________________________________________________

Fireworks explode over the National Mall on Independence Day

_______________________________________________________________________

Independence Day; Why the Declaration Matters; 

What's Great about America 


INDEPENDENCE DAY: WHY WE FIGHT
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/independence-day-why-we-fight-4 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Another Independence Day is upon us. Each one presents to us a challenge: will we also fight for freedom and independence, or give them up? The struggle for freedom has not changed, and will never change. It is the eternal struggle over whether human beings will live free, or willingly submit to slavery.
All over the world today, slaves are seeking slavery. Slaves everywhere are defending and even glorifying slavery. As those who are standing against tyranny continue to be excoriated as enemies of the people, demonized, and marginalized, avoiding slavery will be harder than ever. People everywhere defend oppressors and carry water for bullies and tyrants, and think all the while that they’re serving the cause of freedom.
In reality, you are either fighting for one thing, or the other. If you’re not working to advance the cause of freedom, you’re working to advance the cause of slavery. The cause of slavery has so very many advocates today. Be an advocate for freedom — for what we must defend, not what we must fight against:
1. Governments deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
What we must defend:
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…” — Declaration of Independence
What we must defend it against:
Non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.” — Syed Abul Ala Maududi, founder of the Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami
2. Equality of rights before the law.
What we must defend:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” — Declaration of Independence
What we must defend it against:
“The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth that of a Muslim.” — Reliance of the Traveller, a classic manual of Islamic sacred law (o4.9)
“Thus if [a] Muslim commits adultery his punishment is 100 lashes, the shaving of his head, and one year of banishment. But if the man is not a Muslim and commits adultery with a Muslim woman his penalty is execution. … Similarly if a Muslim deliberately murders another Muslim he falls under the law of retaliation and must by law be put to death by the next of kin. But if a non-Muslim who dies at the hand of a Muslim has by lifelong habit been a non-Muslim, the penalty of death is not valid. Instead the Muslim murderer must pay a fine and be punished with the lash. … Since Islam regards non-Muslims as on a lower level of belief and conviction, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, then his punishment must not be the retaliatory death, since the faith and conviction he possesses is loftier than that of the man slain…Again, the penalties of a non-Muslim guilty of fornication with a Muslim woman are augmented because, in addition to the crime against morality, social duty and religion, he has committed sacrilege, in that he has disgraced a Muslim and thereby cast scorn upon the Muslims in general, and so must be executed. … Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them.” — Sultanhussein Tabandeh, A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
3. Freedom of speech
What we must defend:
“Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
What we must defend it against:
“In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film ‘Fitna’, we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed. As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.” — Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation
“Pakistan will ask the European Union countries to amend laws regarding freedom of expression in order to prevent offensive incidents such as the printing of blasphemous caricatures of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and the production of an anti-Islam film by a Dutch legislator…” — Daily Times of Pakistan
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Hussein Obama
“We also understand that, for 235 years, freedom of expression has been a universal right at the core of our democracy. So we are focused on…us[ing] some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” — Hillary Clinton
“We are going to have the filmmaker arrested.” — Hillary Clinton, referring to the filmmaker whose YouTube video about Muhammad she blamed for the Benghazi jihad massacre
4. Freedom of religion, and non-establishment of religion
What we must defend:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
What we must defend it against:
“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” — Hamas-linked CAIR co-founder and longtime board chairman Omar Ahmad (he denies saying it, but the original reporter stands by her story)
“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” — Hamas-linked CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper
The Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — Mohamed Akram, “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”
Never surrender. Never submit. Never be silenced. Freedom and independence forever.