OBAMA WIRETAPPED TRUMP CAMPAIGN PHONES & CAUGHT ILLEGALLY FUNDING ACTIVIST GROUPS

OBAMA WIRETAPPED TRUMP CAMPAIGN PHONES & CAUGHT ILLEGALLY FUNDING ACTIVIST GROUPS

 Published on Mar 4, 2017

Barack Obama bugged Donald Trump's phone before the election through a secret FISA warrant, using the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in order to gain access to the Trump campaign's communications, according to sources within the Administration. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
 

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCUSES OBAMA OF WIRETAPPING TRUMP TOWER PHONES

SEE: http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news571.htm; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 By 
        NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
       Former President Barack Obama, who possesses quite a history of ordering 

       wiretaps and computer hackings of his perceived enemies, is being accused 

       on Saturday of having had his minions wiretap the campaign headquarters 

       of a GOP candidate he feared would eliminate his so-called legacy.

According to a number of news stories, President Donald Trump accused former President Obama of ordering his Trump Tower phones tapped during the final weeks of Trump's campaign leading up to his November 8, 2016 election victory over Hillary Clinton.

In tweets posted early Saturday morning, the President compared Obama's alleged wiretapping to both “McCarthyism” and “Nixon/Watergate.”

“Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism,” Trump said in his Twitter post at 6:35 a.m.

At 6:49 a.m., President Trump wrote: "Is it legal for a sitting President to be "wire tapping" a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!"

While Trump appears to know there's blood in the water of the Democrats, he has not revealed how he discovered Obama's alleged espionage, which appears to have been conducted without proper procedure.

"This is a serious charge against a former president, but Obama does have a history of spying on perceived enemies. Fox News Channel's Washington correspondent James Rosen was one of the targets of an Obama spy operation as was CBS News' Emmy-winning journalist Sharyl Attkinsson," said former police detective, attorney and political strategist Joel Murray.

"In fact, CBS practically helped Obama's people persecute Attkinsson, which isn't really a stretch since her boss at CBS News was David Rhodes, the brother of Obama's deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes who has his own controversies," Murray added.

Ironically, Ben Rhodes tweeted a response to Trump's statements: "No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you." However, Rhodes has been caught several times bending the truth and he once admitted lying in order to get Americans to accept the Iranian nuclear deal.

Also former President Obama called the allegations false. He said that "neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen."

"A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice," said Kevin Lewis in a statement released hours after accusations that Obama ordered a "Nixon/Watergate" plot to wiretap the telephones in Trump Tower prior to the 2016 presidential election.

"As part of that practice," continued Lewis, "neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen."

But those statements by Lewis and Rhodes may be departures from the record. In the case of journalist James Rosen, according to The Guardian, a left-wing British newspaper, instead of relying on the threat of a contempt charge to get journalists to divulge their sources, the Obama administration used warrantless wiretapping and dragnet records seizures to identify who was talking to whom.

ELECTRONIC EAVESDROPPING

According to electronic eavesdropping expert Jacob Gusack, "wire" communications are made through the use of wire, cable or similar connection between the point of origin and the point of reception: it's the classic telephone call. In order for a communication to be by "wire," it must contain a human voice. So, an e-mail message doesn't qualify.

"Oral communications are uttered or spoken, and the speaker has an expectation that it's private and will not be intercepted. For example, there is no violation of the Act when agents intercept and record a prisoner's conversations with other inmates because the prisoner has no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison.

"An 'electronic' communication is one that does not contain the human voice, but contains things like words or pictures. E-mail messages are the best example of such communications.

"Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which protects e-mail messages from interception and disclosure to third parties, an exception allows employers to monitor employee email in the ordinary course of business. Although the meaning of that exception is not yet settled, it may permit an employer to monitor "business-related," but not personal, communications, or courts may look to whether the employer had a legitimate business reason for monitoring employee communications," Gusack, a former police surveillance expert, noted.

 Knowing that Trump and his family have access to some of law enforcement's and private security's top officials, it is not difficult for the new President to find out if his privacy was compromised. These New York City firms -- usually comprised of retired police officials and federal law enforcement agents -- are routinely hired to "sweep" facilities.

According to Frank Sizemore, a retired police captain, he and his operatives inspect power lines, selected telephone lines, cellular phones, land line phones with bug detection equipment, Telephone Analyzers, telephone line analysis and instrument analysis.

They also use discreet detection equipment to detect hidden electronic devices and any bugs, regardless of whether the wiretap or bug device is hard wired, wireless / radiating or not. A complete physical search is conducted within interior surfaces, wall plates, phones, ceilings, lamps, furniture, planters, wall decorations, ventilation ducts, lighting fixture and electrical fixtures.

________________________________________________________

 Breaking: Obama Caught Illegally Funding 

Activist Groups 

 Published on Mar 3, 2017

Obama has been doing everything he can to sabotage Donald Trump, going so far as to fund activist groups.

 INVESTIGATION: 

Obama's Diversion of Funds and McCain's Ties To ISIS 

 Published on Mar 6, 2017

Infowars reporters David Knight and Millie Weaver cover the latest in developments regarding Obama's diverting funds through the DOJ to protest groups and McCain's ties to ISIS.

 

Obama DOJ Funneled BILLIONS to Liberal Activist Groups

Activist organizations funded through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme...

BY FOX NEWS

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/obama-doj-funneled-billions-to-liberal-activist-groups/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators.
“It’s clear partisan politics played a role in the illicit actions that were made,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, told Fox News. “The DOJ is the last place this should have occurred.”

Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism.
There is a recent effort by Republicans to eliminate the practice, which many believe was widely abused during the Obama administration.

Read more
________________________________________________________

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/03/obamas-goal-to-oust-trump-from.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/03/lawsuit-obama-robbed-private-investors.html 

IMMUNITY WITHDRAWN: MARINE LE PEN OPEN TO ARREST & PROSECUTION BY EU FOR TWEETING IMAGES OF ISLAMIC VIOLENCE

 

EU Parliament lifts immunity from prosecution for Le Pen for tweeting images of Islamic State violence

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/eu-parliament-lifts-immunity-from-prosecution-for-le-pen-for-tweeting-images-of-islamic-state-violence;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 The EU parliament decision “marks the difference between those who denounce and fight Islamist fundamentalism and those who want to hide the atrocities.”

Indeed. The EU is desperate to hide the atrocities, particularly as the results of their suicidal immigration policies are becoming crystal clear to everyone. These corrupt authoritarians may be able to shut down those who call attention to these atrocities, and they may be able to persecute Le Pen, but they will not be able to hide the truth forever: their policies are blowing up in their faces, a phrase that is becoming more literal by the day.
“EU Parliament lifts Le Pen immunity over gruesome tweets,” by Samuel Petrequin, Associated Press, March 2, 2017:

PARIS (AP) — The European Parliament voted Thursday to lift the immunity from prosecution for French far-right leader Marine Le Pen for tweeting gruesome images of Islamic State violence, a crime that carries up to three years in prison in France.
The legislature voted by a broad majority in Brussels to clear the way for the possible prosecution of Le Pen over tweets she made in December 2015 showing executions, including the killing of American reporter James Foley by Islamic State extremists.
French prosecutors in the city of Nanterre had asked lawmakers to lift the immunity that Le Pen enjoys as a member of the European Parliament.
Le Pen, a leading candidate in this year’s French presidential election, posted her tweets in response to a journalist who drew an analogy between her anti-immigration National Front party and IS extremists. She was trying to show the difference between the two groups but the effort backfired, drawing widespread condemnation.
Le Pen took down the tweet showing the killing of Foley after his family protested, but left up another image of violence by Islamic State extremists.
Under French law, publishing violent images can be punished by up to three years in jail and a fine of 75,000 euros ($78,800).
Before the vote, Le Pen on Thursday defended her tweets, saying she just wanted to condemn the barbaric practices of IS, also known as Daesh.
“I’m a lawmaker. I’m in my role when I condemn Daesh, this is my role,” she told French TV station LCP. “And if I don’t fulfill my role, I’m worth nothing as a lawmaker. Nobody can prevent a republic’s representative from condemning Daesh’s acts of violence.”
Her campaign manager, David Rachline, denounced the lawmakers’ actions.
The EU parliament decision “marks the difference between those who denounce and fight Islamist fundamentalism and those who want to hide the atrocities,” Rachline said….
Macron said he would not comment on Le Pen’s situation, then added “fortunately our national and European institutions are not losing their common sense.”…

It’s not common sense. It’s naked authoritarianism.

THE NEXT WOMEN’S MARCH IS CO-ORGANIZED BY AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST

THE NEXT WOMEN’S MARCH IS CO-ORGANIZED 

BY AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST

SEE: http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh399.htm; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Kelleigh Nelson

March 4, 2017
NewsWithViews.com

Peaceful dissent and protest is a hallmark of American freedom. Rioting, destroying business, and attacking people who disagree with you are hallmarks of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Communist China, North Korea… If you are either too stupid to understand that or you actually embrace this approach, then you are not American. Not even close. —J. D. Pendry

J.D. Pendry is absolutely spot on, and the filthy tirades by the so-called Hollywood elite in the first women’s march, demanding more dead babies, was enough to show grassroots Americans that those women are demonically possessed. And yes, the initial women’s march was co-organized by a pro-Palestinian Islamic woman named Linda Sarsour. The photo of her picture on a van, is from the first march.

The foolish women attending these marches cannot see that it behooves Islamics to promote American women to kill their unborn babies. Why? Because the typical Islamic family produces 6.2 children and this is how they take over nation states, by sheer numbers. American women have two children per family, sometimes less, sometimes none, and barely replace themselves. The American women involved in this are being played by Islamists for the takeover of the western world, and they’re too stupid to even see it.

The Truth from Oriana Fallaci

Italian journalist, Oriana Fallaci, had the chutzpah to tell the truth about Islam. She did it quite well in her little book, The Rage and the Pride. To read it is to understand the destruction of Europe. Oriana warned America that the same would happen to us. She had death threats from Islamists, over and over again, but she stood for the truth and never gave up.

To paraphrase this wonderful brave woman, she said of Islam,

First, they immigrate, then they breed like rats, then they use the laws of the country they're infiltrating to gain special accommodations for their religious views. Then, when there are enough of them, they disrupt the normal lives of the country's people, and then the so-called 'moderates' join in. And pretty soon, the country is lost.

No, not all Islamists are like this, but a large majority are, and they want to dominate the world. Islam is not a religion, nor is it peaceful, and they do not worship the same God as Judeo-Christians. Islam is found in the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, and it is involved in these Women’s Marches, both the first one, and now the second one.

Convicted Terrorist Organizes March

Notice the garbage left by the first march, unlike when pro-lifers march on D.C., and there is nothing to empty except garbage cans. These women are destructive, and this is shown explicitly by those who are organizing these militant marches. Like J.D. Pendry said, “they are not Americans.” A manifesto published in The Guardian on 6 February 17, states this very fact…a “new wave of militant feminist struggle.” Struggle to kill their unborn babies, the very children who have different DNA and who are growing inside the mother’s body? Is that their struggle? That baby is not part of her body, it is a totally different human being, but they would rather kill the child than allow it life, because their lives center around their own self-identity and nothing else.

“Militant” feminist struggle somehow seems appropriate, considering one of these so-called feminists is Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a former “Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine” (PFLP) terrorist who was sentenced to life in prison in Israel in 1970 for her involvement in two terrorist bombings in Jerusalem in 1969. One of the bombings killed two students while they were shopping for groceries (both males) – but Odeh only spent 10 years in prison before being released in a prisoner exchange with the PFLP in 1980.

How Odeh managed to become a US citizen in 2004 without proper vetting is beyond most Americans, and this is what our President wants to stop. Apparently, the INS never bothered to check even google, or they’d have found she was a convicted terrorist.

In 2014, she was convicted of immigration fraud for the lies she told to enter this country, mainly for concealing her arrest, conviction, and imprisonment for the 1969 bombings. However, she won the right to a new trial this coming spring, by claiming she had been suffering from PTSD at the time she lied on her application. Oh, and in her time as a citizen, she worked for a while as an Obamacare navigator. She also served as associate director at the Arab American Action Network in Chicago, Illinois. Odeh’s history is a perfect reason she never should have been allowed in our country.

Americans need to understand that our own government has worked against the citizens to implement the new world order and globalism. This is why the hatred of Donald Trump is so vitriolic. He is not a globalist. He has promised to keep these barbaric savages from infiltrating and destroying our beloved country.

This is why we need our President’s Executive Order stopping potential Islamic terrorists from coming into the United States. The danger to American citizens has been exposed time and again, and the rotten leftist appointed judiciary is fighting the man who wants to protect us!

Odeh’s Manifesto Document

Rasmea Yousef Odeh, actually co-authored this Manifesto document with Communist Angela Davis, and Maoist Tithi Bhattacharya. The left believes this Islamist woman is a hero, despite her murdering past and imprisonment. 

Angela Davis and Communism

Angela Davis is a Stalinist professor and longtime supporter of the Black Panthers who blocked voting districts in 2008 in order to elect Obama. My cousin lived in Philadelphia at the time and actually emailed me about what was happening. And Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, actually dropped the case against them.

Davis is best known for being acquitted in a 1972 trial after three guns she bought were used in a courtroom shootout that resulted in the death of a judge. She celebrated by going to Cuba. In the 70s, when my family and I lived in Moline, Illinois, we attended a church, the denomination of which I was raised in…and they had a meeting after the service on Sunday morning. After this meeting, I never stepped foot in this church again, because I found that monies we donated to this church, which were going to the Synod, were funding Communist Angela Davis.

Maoisist Tithi Bhattacharya

A third co-author, Tithi Bhattacharya, praised Maoism in an essay for the International Socialist Review, noting that Maoists are “on the terrorist list of the US State Department, Canada, and the European Union.” Maoism is a political philosophy which builds upon both Marxism and Leninism. Just lovely, and totally anathema to the founding of our beloved country based on freedom and liberty.

These women think this is an international grass-roots affair, and they are promising more information on how to participate in protests throughout our country, all of which are financed and promoted by George Soros and Barack Hussein Obama’s Indivisible movement. They are actually urging women to walk off their jobs and join a demonstration near them to promote the murder of unborn babies, and hatred of our new President.

This group of Islamic and communist leftists wants women to spend their day blocking roads, bridges, and squares and abstaining from any domestic care and sexual relations with their spouses, and boycotting any pro-Trump businesses. They also want everyone to wear red in solidarity.

Violence, Not Peaceful Demonstrations

The hostility and belligerence of the manifesto and its call for a “militant” uprising is yet another indicator that liberals are increasingly willing to justify violence in the name of opposing Trump. After the Berkeley campus erupted in flames and violence to protest the planned appearance of Milo Yiannopoulos, many socialist activists took to Twitter to cheer them on. Hollywood stars Debra Messing and Sarah Silverman both tweeted their support, with Messing saying, “Resistance works,” and Silverman ranting, “Wake up and join the resistance. Once the military is with us, fascists get overthrown. Mad king and his handlers go bye-bye.”

The insanity is that they don’t realize they are the fascists…not our new President.

The organizers of this second march believe that it is okay to punch people in the face if you hate them. And now, Trump supporters are not the only targets, these protestors are even angry at liberal democrats, allegedly because they too are “linked to the corporate capitalist structure,” according to Angela Davis.

Conclusion

In our President’s first message to the joint session of Congress, he said, “Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. We are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical Islamic terrorism.” Rasmea Yousef Odeh is a radical Islamic terrorist, and she is one of the organizers of this latest women’s march.

 The rage at losing their globalist socialist new world order candidate has made them vicious, sadistic and cold blooded, and their fanatical pro-abortion stances are seen as demonic in nature. The filth they spewed at the last march was repulsive and abhorrent. They lacked the female refinement of good manners and good taste, and dove headfirst into the sewers of vulgar and offensive obscenities. Please pray for them.

Trump supporters want to keep our sovereign nation, our faith in God, our freedoms and liberties. We want borders that protect our citizens, jobs that pay enough to raise our families, free market healthcare, and lower taxes, and those are just a few reasons why we elected Donald J. Trump as our President.

Pray for him, hold his feet to the fire, and tweet to him how you feel. He is a man chosen by God, and it is our prayers that will give him the wisdom to lead our country.

P.S. Every day NewsWithViews brings amazingly researched articles and opinions on the state of our country into your mailbox. It is not a cheap endeavor to run this amazing website. The journalists donate their time and articles, and the editor of NWVs works tirelessly without pay to bring you the best information on the web. It is your donations that keep this website alive. Please go here to help with any amount you can.

DEFINING VACCINE REFUSAL AS CHILD NEGLECT

DEFINING VACCINE REFUSAL AS CHILD NEGLECT 

BY KATE RAINES

SEE: http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2017/02/defining-vaccine-refusal-as-child-neglect/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Although specific child welfare guidelines vary from state to state, medical neglect of a child is generally accepted as legitimate grounds for family intervention by government officials working for Child Protective Services (CPS) and may lead to parents losing custody of their minor child and/or losing the legal right to make health care decisions on behalf of their child.
Broadly defined as failure “to exercise a minimum degree of care in supplying the child with adequate health care,” medical neglect may also be expanded to include “parental acts of omission in the care of their child” deemed to either actually or potentially compromise the child’s health.¹
A  new vaccine policy analysis, which was written by two obstetricians and a pediatrician and published in the American Journal of Public Health, examined past U.S. legal decisions that considered whether vaccine refusal does, or should, fall under the jurisdiction of medical neglect and, therefore, serve to establish grounds for intervention by government officials in child welfare agencies.¹ The analysis, “Professional Responsibility and Early Childhood Vaccination,” was authored by Frank A. Chervenak, MD, Laurence McCullough, PhD, and Robert Brent, MD.²

Taking Threats to a New Level

Noting that in the current atmosphere of increased vaccine hesitancy, pediatricians are struggling to find ways to manage the resistance to vaccination in their practice, the authors of this study suggest that vaccine refusal may be accepted as medical neglect given that  “a child is exposed to some potential risk of harm by a parental act of omission.”² The physician authors allege that many states do not go far enough to allow CPS to intervene when vaccine refusal is the sole or primary reason for the intervention.
Many parents consider this a radical public health policy that constitutes a frightening assault on parental rights, but some doctors, attorneys and mandatory vaccination proponents maintain it is appropriate to force use of vaccines when parents decline to adhere to the physician recommended childhood vaccine schedule.³
Dr. Chervenak and his co-authors agree and take the position that if informed parents continue to refuse vaccinations for their children, it should be considered child neglect and those parents should be reported to local child health protection agencies:

If parents remain unpersuaded, their informed refusal becomes child neglect, because they are refusing to authorize evidence-based, effective, and safe preventive care required by the best interests of the child standard as a norm. There is a strict legal obligation to report child neglect to the local child health protective services agency.²

They further argue that reporting vaccine refusers to government child welfare officials could be viewed as an effective way to open up opportunities for further education of such misguided parents, but they admit that such reporting might cause the parents to lose trust in the doctor, who would then lose any further educational opportunities.
They conclude that it may be better to use threats and coercion to dismiss children from a medical practice if their parents refuse vaccinations, as that could help sway the parents’ opinion.

We have seen numerous steadfast refusers of vaccines come around to acceptance when faced with a physician who feels so strongly about the benefits of vaccination that he/she is willing to go to the extreme length of discharging a family who refuses vaccination.²

State Versus Parental Rights

The idea of using physician coercion and government sponsored punishment of people who refuse vaccination is nothing new. More than a century ago in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the 1905 U.S. Supreme Court majority affirmed the constitutional authority of state legislatures to mandate smallpox vaccination. The Court ruled that citizens do not have the right under the U.S. Constitution to be free at all times because there are “manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subjected for the common good.” The judges said, “We do not perceive that this legislation has invaded any right secured by the Federal Constitution.”⁴
Although mandatory vaccination proponents like attorney Lawrence Gostin have cited the Jacobson v. Massachusetts ruling as “the most important judicial decision in public health,”⁵ human rights advocates like NVIC co-founder and president, Barbara Loe Fisher, have called it a “morally flawed” legal precedent “that allows government to commit human rights abuses.”⁶
In recognition of the scope of the 1905 ruling, the authors of the vaccine policy analysis used that year as the beginning of their survey period, following court cases up through 2016 to weigh legal opinions on vaccine refusal as a definitive factor to determine child neglect. They reported very few cases, though they claim that most of those on the books did consider vaccine refusal to constitute child neglect. They admitted that differences in state vaccine laws make it difficult to compare the cases or to know how they would have been handled today (only one of the cases studied had been heard in the past 20 years).
The authors also expressed surprise at the rarity of documented cases in the current atmosphere of increasing vaccine hesitancy and proposed that, “Additional studies on the practices and rationales of pediatric providers, other mandatory reporters, and CPS caseworkers regarding this issue would be elucidatory.”⁷

Dissenting Opinions Should Not Be Cause for Fear

Individuals declining to follow one-size-fits-all vaccine policies and laws are not the first minority in society to face prejudice and discrimination in the name of ‘the greater good.’ From compulsory sterilization of individuals deemed “unworthy of reproducing”⁸ to differences in attitude and availability of health care for individuals depending on medical history, weight, age, race, gender, social class, or sexual preference, those in the minorities continually have to fight for equality and protection from medical policies and public health laws that raise their risk for being harmed.
Parents welcome open and mutually respectful discussion with physicians about vaccination, and they should not have to fear that they might lose children if they happen to disagree with their doctor or public health officials about how to raise them.

---

References:
¹ Parasidis E, et al. Parental Refusal of Childhood Vaccines and Medical Neglect Laws. Amer J Publ Health 107(1):68-71. 2017.
² Chervenak FA, et al. Professional responsibility and early childhood vaccination. J Pediatr 169: 305–309, 2016.
³ Fisher BL. The Vaccine Culture War in America: Are You Ready? NVIC Newsletter Mar. 8, 2015.
⁴ Gostin LO. Law, Ethics, and Public Health in the Vaccination Debates. Politics of the Measles Outbreak. JAMA 2015;313(11):1099-1100. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1518.
⁵ Gostin LO. Jacobson v. Massachusetts at 100 Years: Police Power and Civil Liberties in Tension. Am J Public Health 2005; 95(4): 576-581.
⁶ Fisher BL. Forced Vaccination: The Tragic Legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts. NVIC Newsletter Nov. 2, 2016.
⁷ Parasidis E, et al. Parental Refusal of Childhood Vaccines and Medical Neglect Laws. Amer J Publ Health 107(1):68-71. 2017.
⁸ Cohen A. Buck v. Bell: Inside the SCOTUS Case That Led to Forced Sterilization of 70,000 & Inspired the Nazis. Independent Global News (transcript) Mar.  17, 2016.

DISNEY AIRS ITS FIRST EVER "GAY" CARTOON KISS

DISNEY AIRS ITS FIRST EVER "GAY" CARTOON KISS 

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2017/03/02/disney-airs-its-first-ever-gay-cartoon-kiss/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 The popular children’s entertainment company Disney aired 
its first-ever same-sex kissing scene on Monday during a broadcast of 
its television cartoon “Star vs. the Forces of Evil,” raising concerns 
from Christian and family groups who are calling upon parents to kiss 
Disney goodbye.

The episode included a scene where main character Star and her friend Marco, both 14, attend a boy band concert together. During the song “Just Friends,” couples throughout the audience begin kissing.
But in surveying the cartoon characters, at least one of the twosomes locking lips are boys and another later on appears to be two girls.
Homosexual advocacy groups cheered the inclusion, stating, “We’re getting there, one kiss at a time.”

However, others expressed concern, stating that Disney should not be pushing the homosexual agenda on children.
“This is the last place parents would expect their children to be confronted with content regarding sexual orientation,” one Million Moms wrote on their website. “Issues of this nature are being introduced too early and too soon, and it is becoming extremely common and unnecessary.”
Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis also lamented the development.
Was just burdened as I saw what Disney is doing and realized that I don’t want my grandkids watching those channels on television or anything like that, ’cause you never know what’s going to happen there now,” he said in a live Facebook video posted on Thursday.
“I’ve seen an increasing emphasis on bringing the gay [agenda] into movies and TV series, and we see what’s happening across this nation,” Ham stated. “So, we need to take a stand.”
As previously reported, the director of Disney’s upcoming “Beauty and the Beast” live-action remake has also revealed that one of the film’s characters is portrayed as homosexual and will therefore include a “gay moment.”
Director Bill Condon, who is an open homosexual, told the outlet “Attitude” that the character LeFou, who serves as the sidekick to Gaston, will have a subplot surrounding his attraction to Gaston. Luke Evans, an open homosexual, was cast as Gaston, and Josh Gad plays LeFou.
“LeFou is somebody who on one day wants to be Gaston and on another day wants to kiss Gaston,” Condon told the publication.
“He’s confused about what he wants. It’s somebody who’s just realizing that he has these feelings,” he continued. “And Josh makes something really subtle and delicious out of it. And that’s what has its payoff at the end, which I don’t want to give away. But it is a nice, exclusively gay moment in a Disney movie.”
Disney has also reportedly included homosexual relationships in productions such as “Good Luck Charlie” and “Gravity Falls,” and some have expressed suspicion about characters in several of its other films.
“Disney has decided to be politically correct versus providing family-friendly entertainment. Disney should stick to entertaining instead of pushing an agenda,” One Million Moms said.
The group is calling on parents to sign a pledge not to support Disney until it stops pushing homosexuality on the nation’s children. There were over 20,000 signees as of press time.
Ham encouraged Christian parents to rather take their children to the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter in Kentucky, or the Sight & Sound Theater in Pennsylvania and Missouri.