THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
The Conservative Tribune reports, A top Secret Service agent who said on
Facebook that she wouldn’t take a bullet for President Donald Trump has
been removed from her position, the Washington Examiner reported.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Women who are not properly veiled: an outrage, a provocation. Dousing
women with acid for being not properly veiled: pleasing to Allah.
“Alarming rates of acid attacks in Iran back on the rise,” Al Arabiya, March 20, 2017:
After almost a year of calm, spraying people with burning
acid has returned in Iran where a family of four has been attacked on
Saturday in Sharada, within Isfahan province, Iran’s top tourist
destination.
Last month, unidentified people also attacked two women in Maashour,
within the Ahwaz province, according to Iranian news agencies.
Isfahan’s Investigative Police Chief Sitar Khasraoui said in press
statement that the families were taken to the hospital to treat the
burns. The family consists of the father, 53, the mother, 48, the son,
23, and the daughter, 20. Both parents are said to be in critical
condition….
Reports on social networks have claimed that the victims were doused
on the face and body because they were not properly veiled. They were
targeted by assailants on motorcycles.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This is not new. It has been ongoing for years: when fascists are
unable to control the narrative, they shut down the discussion. I
am seeing now that most of the UK and many other European Internet
service providers (ISPs) are blocking this as well as many other
websites from being viewed.
Not content with shadow banning academics guilty of wrongspeak from social media, attempting to turn them into unpersons, they
are using blocking methods originally developed but rarely used to
block criminal enterprises on the web (think scammers and pedophiles)
with far more alacrity than when they were ever used as originally
intended.
They use a variety of methods to control what you are allowed to view
online, much like how I had “guardian control” on our television to
stop the kids from watching channels that were not suitable. Amusingly, I
know of one home and office firewall company that is listing
jihadwatch.org as “adult entertainment.” A provider in the UK, also
listing Jihad Watch as adult, asks for credit card numbers to prove you
are old enough to view the site.
Canada is introducing “measures,” specifically in Quebec, to block illegal gaming sites,
which I would bet my last Loony on being leveraged in the same way, as
soon as they criminalize “Islamophobia,” a.k.a. any criticism of jihad
and the violence and crime that go hand-in-hand with Islam. So today, some Internet providers just block this and other sites,
giving the impression that site is “down,” not available, mockingly
suggesting, “please try later.” We will be seeing far more of this, and
there is little anyone can do to stop this from being implemented
further.
The vast majority of blocks are actually very simple to bypass. They
“poison” the DNS servers that they provide free with your Internet
access to misdirect you to other locations. The Turkish government has
been using this method for Internet access for a few years. The Chinese
“protect” nearly half the world’s population from ThoughtCrime with this
trick.
DNS stands for Domain Name Servers. They translate the user-entered website (domain name) such as www.jihadwatch.org into a number that is used by your computer to connect to the website — think postal/zip code. Normally,
you are automatically assigned DNS Name Server addresses by your
Internet service provider, but changing the DNS servers (on your local
machine or router) will stop censorship using this method.
Bypassing the simple DNS poisoning method that is most commonly used
is very simple: you just change the DNS servers that Cisco, the worldwide leader in IT and networking hardware, was kind enough to provide. Try use.opendns.com or safer for sharing 208.69.38.205 (which
cannot be easily blocked). In fact, in many cases, OpenDNS may be a
better service than your own service provider’s DNS. It is simply
tested, but whatever happens in the future, keep that link handy to
check if your favorite websites really did just vanish.
Here is a complete current list of free to use public DNS servers, Cisco
just has great instructions to make the required changes. I believe
they do this intentionally to assist in bypassing government censorship.
Further, I would strongly suggest that anyone who may in the future
be guilty of wrongthink or some other thoughtcrime, go one step further
and encrypt all your Internet traffic using a VPN (Virtual Private
Network), so that Internet providers, government agencies and even
employers can not snoop. I have been involved with the development of airvpn.
I have no financial motive, but I believe they are the best
(speed/price), but maybe not as user-friendly as some more commercial
VPNs such as Freedome.
Using a VPN would be best practice to also stop cyber criminals from
carrying out a number of attacks against you when you are using a public
wifi (cafe, airport, etc.). It also is a more thorough way to block
censorship. If you use a VPN, you do not need to change DNS servers, as
the VPN does this for you.
*above, I knowingly use the term “dns poisoning” knowing that it is
most commonly used to describe an attack when a bad actor diverts a
website’s intended traffic to some other location, normally to inflict
some damage, but the ISPs are using similar methods that a Bad Actor
would use with the intent of censorship.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
David Brock and George Soros’s fingerprints are all over the
most recent effort to destroy Roger Stone – this time by organizing a
mainstream media lynching of Stone for his alleged involvement with the
Russians.
What makes the lynching of Roger Stone so
nefarious is that information now being disseminated by the Brock-Soros
attack machine to their media co-conspirators could only have been
obtained by extensive electronic surveillance conducted surreptitiously
and most likely without proper judicial authorization by Deep State
enemies of the Trump administration still buried deep within the NSA and
CIA.
The Smoking Gun, in attacking Stone, published
detailed information about the FBI’s investigation of Guccifer 2.0
could only have come from Deep State sources within the FBI and the U.S.
intelligence agencies, including NSA and CIA.
Brock’s determination to destroy Stone began early last year, when
Brock realized Stone could be effective in advancing Donald Trump’s 2016
presidential campaign.
In the sixth video of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas Action, Bradley Beychock, then president of David Brock’s Media Matters, bragged,
“Our big role with Trump as a media watchdog is to take his MVPs [Most
Valuable Players] and put them on the sidelines. So the first one is
Roger Stone.”
Beychock on the O’Keefe video can be heard bragging about the campaign Media Matters ran to smear Stone.
“We
led the campaign to track every book appearance [that Stone did],”
Beychock insisted. “We took everything that was crazy in his book and
made sure people knew it was sourced in crazy material, we parsed out
his tweets by ethnicity group – whether the attack was on minorities, or
LGBT folks, or on immigrants.”
Media Matters goal was to get Stone blacklisted by the major cable news channels.
“We
published that with the networks – reached out privately to each
network and said, ‘Hey, are you aware you have had this guy on 12 times
in the last four months and he said these three things about your
anchors or the people you have on the air, or work for your
organization,” Beychock went on cheerfully, as if relishing in a recent
successful hit job.
“Ultimately, we got Stone banned from Fox,
MSNBC, and CNN, and he hasn’t been on in four months. So, like we try to
take the MVPs off the sidelines.”
In a briefing book entitled “Transforming the Media Landscape” (obtained by the Free Beacon) that Brock published privately in January to solicit donors, Media Matters resumed the attack against Stone.
In
the briefing book for donors, Brock bragged that Media Matters
“succeeded in pressuring CNN, MSNBC, and even Fox News to stop booking
Roger Stone, a regular guest and a longtime Trump ally.”
Brock
proceeded to smear Stone, charging that Stone “has a decades-long
history of employing political dirty tricks and regularly spouting
violent, racist, and sexist rhetoric.”
But, undeterred, Stone in January published his best-seller, The Making of the President 2016: How Donald Trump Orchestrated a Revolution – a book that currently has 100,000 copies in print, with Stone doing a bi-coastal media tour.
Some will remember that back in December, Stone’s doctor found the politico had been mysterious poisoned with a very small dosage of radioactive material, most likely polonium.
Racked
with fever and hospitalized, Stone suffered through projectile
vomiting, violent diarrhea, night sweats, delirium dehydration, and a
rash that took the veteran Republican nearly a month to recover.
Those who tried to kill (or warn) Stone failed.
Having
failed in all these efforts to sideline Stone, the next tactic of the
Deep State was to arrange a mainstream media mass lynching, re-inventing
in hard-left New Age fashion the horrid Ku Klux Klan terror technique
of radical Democrats in the post-Civil War, Reconstruction Era South.
The
goal of the Brock-Stone media-manipulation team was to sideline Stone
permanently, to remove him from being of assistance to President Trump
in the battles ahead.
The problem facing the Deep State was that Stone’s only exchange with the hacker was a perfunctory exchange that took place ex post facto, almost five weeks after the DNC documents hacked by Guccifer 2.0 had already released.
But
the Brock-Soros propaganda machine was not deterred that no hard
evidence had been produced to support the Democratic Party narrative
that Hillary lost the election because Roger Trump schemed with Russia
to intervene in the U.S. presidential election.
The lynching of Roger Stone began on March 8, when the Smoking Gun reported that Stone had been in touch with “Guccifer 2.0” prior to the November election.
The Smoking Gun presented this without acknowledging that Stone himself first brought out the contact with Guccifer 2.0 in an article Stone authored in Breitbart.com on Aug. 5, 2016.
In that article, entitled “Dear Hillary: DNC Hack Solved, So Stop
Blaming Russia,” Stone pointed out that Guccifer 2.0 explained he was
responsible both for hacking Hillary’s home server and subsequently for
his hacking of the DNC, in which Guccifer 2.0 hacked John Podesta’s
emails.
Still, the Smoking Gun insisted on reporting this as if it were uncovering some great secret.
This is the Smoking Gun first paragraph: In
the months before Election Day, a longtime confidante and political
consultant for Donald Trump was in contact with the Russian hacking
group that U.S. intelligence officials have accused of illegally
breaching the Democratic National Committee’s computer system and the
e-mail accounts of Hillary Clinton campaign officials in a bid to aid
Trump, The Smoking Gun has learned.
And the Smoking Gun second paragraph: The
contact between Roger Stone, the Trump associate, and the Russian
influence operation came via private messages exchanged on Twitter,
according to a source. Stone’s contact was with “Guccifer 2.0,” an
online persona that U.S. officials say was created by Russian government
officials to distribute and publicize material stolen during hacks of
the DNC, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Gmail
accounts used by Clinton staffers like John Podesta, the campaign’s
chairman.
What followed the Smoking Gun article published on March 8 was a mainstream media feeding frenzy attacking Stone.
The
intensity with which the mainstream media repeated the Smoking Gun
story resembled the frenzy with which a Ku Klux Klan posse organized in
the Reconstruction Era South to string up some innocent African-American
from a tree without so much as an indictment, let alone a trial.
Look
at the number of publications that piled on Stone, parroting what the
Smoking Gun had published, adding their own inflammatory headlines and
damning prose.
On Friday, Salon.com published the story under the headline, “Roger Stone doesn’t ‘like Russian dressing,’ says his chat with Guccifer was innocuous.”
On Friday, the Hill headline read, “Trump adviser admits to contact with DNC hacker.”
On Friday, GQ reported, “Former Trump Advisor Roger Stone Was in Contact with a Russian Hacker During the Election.”
On Saturday, Talking Points Memo, TPM News, ran the headline, “Ex-Trump Adviser Roger Stone Was in Contact with DNC Hacking Suspect.”
On Saturday, the Chicago Tribune ran with, “Ex-Trump adviser Roger Stone swapped messages with DNC hacking suspect.
On Saturday, Raw Story reported “Roger Stone admits having contact with alleged DNC hacker.”
On Monday, CBS News ran, “Roger Stone on why ‘exchange’ with DNC hacking suspect Guccifer 2.0 was ‘innocuous.’”
The mainstream media largely ignored Stone’s protest on his website that the timeline proves the “Russian Collusion” meme was a lie.
“The
Smoking Gun website has come up with a sensational but bogus claim that
I collaborated with a hacker, Guccifer 2.0 to hack data from the DNC
and have WikiLeaks release it,” Stone wrote on StoneColdTruth.com.
“This is another absurd media claim that is part of the long-standing
absurd claim that Donald Trump had anything to do with the Russians.
This is a charge without a shred of evidence.”
Next Stone
explained how the timeline should have made the “Russian collusion”
narrative a lie, had any reporters replaying the Smoking Gun
sensationalism bothered to check.
“All contact I had with the entity known as Guccifer 2.0 came afterI had written an article that was published on August 5th, by Breitbart Newsand vetted by their lead investigative reporter Lee Stranahan,” Stone explained. “That article cameafter the DNC and DCCC material had been released and identified the role of a hacker going by the moniker Guccifer 2 based on our own sources.” [Bold and italics in original]
Stone’s
conclusion was obvious: “Therefore, any such ‘collaboration’ would’ve
also involved a time machine – something that I think Putin has not
perfected yet.”
What Dinesh D’Sousa clearly proved in his most recent documentary film and bestselling book, Hillary’s America: The Secret of the Democratic Party, was that when the Reconstruction Era Ku Klux Klan took off their hoods, they proved to be Southern Democrats.
Psychiatrists
understanding the psychological phenomenon of “projection” and
generations of high school students assigned to read Harper Lee’s 1960
classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird should understand the Ku
Klux Klansmen lynching innocent African Americans accused of violating
virginal white women may have been driven by the lust they felt in their
own hearts for these same young maidens.
So too, the abundant
evidence is that it was the Democrats in the 2016 election who were
colluding with Russia, not the Republicans
Totally ignored in the media lynching of Roger Stone is a press release the Trump-Pence campaign released on Oct. 9, 2016, entitled “Clinton’s Close Ties to Putin Deserve Scrutiny.”
But Brock-Soros and their media vigilantes are determined to ignore the abundant evidence that Putin was paying both Hillary Clinton, through Russian bank transfers to the Clinton Foundation, and her campaign manager John Podesta,
through a shell company set up in the Netherlands as part of a Russian
money-laundering scheme disclosed in the Panama Papers revelations.
Without
proof, David Brock, the ideological switch-hitter, and George Soros,
the Nazi war collaborator and currency manipulator, will certainly fail
in their attempt to destroy Roger Stone by disseminating disinformation
provided to them by Deep State Trump-haters.
But once the
Brock-Soros attempt failed to blame Stone and Russia for Hillary’s
catastrophic loss on Election Day 2016, who will they blame next for
losing the 2016 presidential election?
Surely, not themselves.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Buoyed by a recently released poll by Public Policy Polling which
showed her leading President Donald Trump 47-40 in a hypothetical 2020
match-up, daytime talk show “queen” Oprah Winfrey (shown) is said to be
toying with the idea of making a bid for the White House.
Of course, Trump trailed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton
throughout most of the 2016 campaign, by as much as 15 points in some
polls, so polling almost four years in advance of an election is often
dismissed as meaningless. After all, if polling that far in advance was
conclusive, then we would have had presidents Dewey, Muskie, and Dukakis
instead of Truman, Nixon, and George H.W. Bush.
But, considering that few gave Trump much of a shot, even when he was
performing well in polls early in the Republican nomination battle in
late 2015 and early 2016, we should not dismiss a run by such a
well-known media personality as Winfrey. Trump had achieved high name
recognition as the host of the popular TV show “The Apprentice,” and Winfrey, if anything, enjoyed even higher name I.D. from her TV fame.
“Given the popularity you have, and that we haven’t broken the glass
ceiling yet for women, you could actually run for president and you
could be elected,” talk show host David Rubinstein told Winfrey, urging
her to consider the idea.
Trump’s path to the White House as a celebrity is seen by some such
as Rubinstein as an indication that the voters are now looking at style
over substance; however, while Trump had a greater name I.D. than most
of his Republican rivals, his positions on issues were just as critical
to his success. He tackled such subjects as disastrous international
trade deals and the tsunami of illegal immigration that the other
candidates generally avoided, demonstrating an ability to connect with
voters.
Though Winfrey is undoubtedly noted for her ability to “connect” with
her many fans, whether that talent will translate into political
success remains to be seen.
Left-wing CNN commentator Van Jones, who has a communist background,
boldly predicted that Winfrey would not only defeat Trump, but that she
would beat him a historic landslide. Speaking on Bravo’s late-night
show Watch What Happens Next, Jones argued, “It takes a superstar to beat a superstar. And I think if Oprah Winfrey ran, she’d win all 50 states.”
Jones also mentioned Democrats Senator Kamala Harris (Calif.),
Senator Corey Booker (N.J.), and Congressman Joe Kennedy III (Mass.).
All three, of course, are conventional politicians, and Trump showed
that celebrities can surprise such professionals. Winfrey has already demonstrated that she has political clout — at
least within the more liberal base of the Democratic Party. It was her
support of fellow Chicagoan U.S. Senator Barack Obama in 2007 that is
seen as giving him the extra credibility he needed to upset Hillary
Clinton to win the 2008 Democratic Party nomination. Her open endorsement of Obama was the first time that Winfrey had
publicly backed a political candidate. She held a fundraiser for him in
September 2007 at her estate, and then three months later she joined
Obama for a series of rallies in the early primary states of Iowa, New
Hampshire, and South Carolina. Some have estimated that she could have
swung more than one and a half million votes for Obama, providing the
difference in his eventual victory.
What had given her such exceptional pull with voters, especially
among those who cast votes in the Democratic primaries? Certainly it was
the trust her many fans placed in her, especially women who were given
the unofficial go-ahead to abandon the female hopeful, Hillary Clinton.
This emotional bond was built over several years because of Oprah's
highly popular daytime talk show.
How did Winfrey rise from poverty to become the wealthiest black
woman in American history? She apparently possessed an ability to talk
and connect with an audience as early as high school, when she had a job
in radio; at age 19 she co-anchored the local evening news. Of course,
her entry into television was helped immensely when she won the Miss
Black Tennessee beauty pageant at age 17.
Her unusual name of “Oprah” was certainly another factor in her
success. Named “Orpah” on her birth certificate, after the biblical
character, that name proved difficult for others to pronounce, and she
eventually became known as Oprah. In the Bible, Orpah was the
daughter-in-law of the Israelite Naomi who returned to her Moabite gods
when Naomi’s other daughter-in-law, Ruth, chose to instead accept the
God of Israel. (Ruth was an ancestor of King David, and eventually, of
course, of Jesus Christ).
Raised a Baptist, the young Oprah was taken to church by her
grandmother, where Oprah was dubbed “The Preacher” for her ability to
quote Bible verses. But Winfrey has certainly abandoned the adherence to
the Scriptures her grandmother and the Baptists attempted to instill in
her. She rejected the more conservative Baptist faith when she heard a
minister say, “The Lord thy God is a jealous God.” Oprah said at the
moment the preacher said the word “jealous,” there was “something about
that [that] didn’t feel right in my spirit because I believe that God is
love and God is in all things.” The belief that God is “in all things” is better known as pantheism.
Indeed, Winfrey has often advocated the views of New Age spiritualist
Eckhart Tolle on the web and in her TV shows. "I took God out of the
box,” she says of her efforts. “One of the mistakes that human beings
make is believing that there is only one way to live. There are many paths to what you call God.”
(Emphasis added). At another time, she indicated that her concept of
God is not orthodox, asserting, “God is a feeling experience and not a
believing experience. If your religion is a believing experience ...
then that’s not truly God.” She has also even been quoted as saying, “I have a church with
myself: I have church walking down the street. I believe in [a] God
force that lives inside all of us, and once you tap into that, you can
do anything.” This sounds more like a line from the Star Wars movies than something found in a Christian church. Soon after the September 11 attacks, Winfrey came to the defense of
Islam in a program she called “Islam 101,” calling it a peaceful
religion and arguing that it was “the most misunderstood of the three
major religions.” Her religious views may not damage her political chances within the
more liberal base Democratic Party; however, it is uncertain whether
such theology would be acceptable to a general election audience. Sociologist Vicki Abt criticized Winfrey in her book Coming After Oprah: Cultural Fallout in the Age of the TV Talk Show.
Abt charged that Winfrey’s show was critical in blurring the lines
between “normal” and “deviant” behavior. Of course, supporters, on the
other hand, credit her for making the LGBT movement, for instance,
mainstream and more socially acceptable. Besides Oprah's social views, her political opinions are certainly
not conservative, either. In 2009, she traveled to Denmark to praise its
socialist system. According to Winfrey, the Danes are the happiest
people on earth, who particularly enjoy living in very small houses.
(Apparently Winfrey likes a bigger house than these “happy” Danes.)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) honored her as the
2008 Person of the Year for her work in uncovering mistreatment of
animals and her advocacy of a vegan diet. She also refused to wear fur
or even allow it to be shown in her magazine, “O.”
It is uncertain, of course, whether Winfrey will actually make a
presidential bid. She would be 67 years old in 2020 — still younger than
either Trump or Clinton was in the last election (and though it didn't
seem to matter to the 70-year-old Trump, Clinton’s health definitely was
a matter of some discussion).
But if she were to run, when one considers the present state of the American electorate, she would have to be taken seriously.
______________________________________________________ SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS: http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2016/10/td-jakes-joins-oprah-winfrey-in-selling.html http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2014/12/equally-yoked-rob-bell-oprah-winfrey.html EXCERPT:
Two weekends ago,
former evangelical pastor Rob Bell and former television icon Oprah
wrapped up their national 8-city “Oprah’s The Life You Want Weekend” New
Age tour. Joining Bell and Oprah on the tour were other two New Age
sympathizers – Deepak Chopra and Elizabeth Gilbert (Eat, Pray, Love). There was a time, not too many years ago, when Bell’s best-selling bookVelvet Elviswas
being read by millions of young evangelicals, and the book was touted
by Christian leaders and college professors. It was a disaster in
discernment in the church as even back then Bell was promoting the New
Age. In a 2007 article, a Lighthouse Trails stated, “Velvet Elvis and
Bell’s Noomas are a trojan horse that will deliver to young
unsuspecting kids from Christian homes a hearty helping of the New Age
(i.e., mysticism and panentheism). And if they are introduced to the New
Age under the guise of Christian literature, many of them will be
seduced by ‘doctrines of devils.'”
Bell, who stepped
down from the evangelical pastorate in 2011, has finally openly shown
his true New Age colors by yoking himself with Oprah Winfrey, the most
influential New Ager in the world today.
“Plain and simple,
Rob Bell’s teachings are not true to the words of Scripture,” Eric Ludy,
pastor of Church at Ellerslie and president of Ellerslie Mission
Society in Windsor, Colorado told Christian News Network. “They are a
sly attempt at blending the philosophies of our post-modern age with the
vernacular of pop-Christianity. The end product is highly dangerous to
the human soul because it is the forging of a golden calf god—a God of
our culture’s making—and certainly not the God of the Bible.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
A man arrested near the White
House after he falsely told Secret Service agents he had a bomb in his
vehicle also said, “this is a test,” stoking concerns after several
other security incidents in recent weeks.
Sean Patrick Keoughan of Roanoke, Virginia was arrested
after he pulled up to a security checkpoint at 15th Street and East
Street NW near the White House at 11pm on Saturday night in a stolen
2017 Chevrolet Impala.
According to
police, Keoughan told Secret Service, “There’s a bomb in the trunk,”
while holding an object in his hand. As he was being arrested, Keoughan
added, “This is a test.”
A robot was dispatched to investigate
the car but nothing was found. Keoughan was subsequently charged with
making false bomb threats and unauthorized use of a vehicle.
Earlier in the day there was another security scare
after a man breached the buffer zone around the White House “in an
apparent attempt to get to the White House fence,” although he was not
able to jump the fence.
Earlier
this month, Jonathan Tran did manage to make it past the fence before
walking around White House grounds for 17 minutes before being spotted.
He was able to get close to a White House entrance before being
apprehended. Tran was reportedly concerned about Russian ties to Trump
and was attempting to deliver a message to the president.
In a related story, the Secret Service announced
that it would permanently remove a top special agent from her position
after she posted on Facebook that she would not take a bullet for Trump.
Given the innumerable death threats against Trump, including a purported assassination attempt last year,
the numerous security scares around the White House, along with
Keoughan’s admission that his intention was to carry out a “test,” if
there was a serious plan to assassinate the president, its plotters can
only be learning from these incidents.
The
hysteria being generated by the mainstream media in response to Trump
simply moving forward with the policy agenda he promised during his
campaign will undoubtedly embolden disturbed individuals to believe they
have the moral high ground, especially in light of the fact that
numerous celebrities and journalists have also called for Trump to be killed.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Donald Trump’s proposed cuts to the United Nations
will “completely destabilize” the world, a senior EU official claims.
The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Frederica Mogherini, freaked out
over Trump’s budget proposal, which calls on the State Department to
reduce America’s contributions to the United Nations by 50%. “If
the United States were to reduce significantly its investment, be it
on humanitarian development aid, peace and security operations, the
world and certain regions of the world would get completely
destabilized,” she said on Monday.
Mogherini was in Washington, D.C. to provide
opening keynote remarks for the 2017 Carnegie International Nuclear
Policy Conference, sponsored by the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace.
Trump’s proposed cuts to America’s funding for the UN have drawn fierce criticism from the global elite and globalist-connected publications. Foreign Policy, owned by the same holding company as the Washington Post, said
Trump’s proposed cuts constituted “an unprecedented retreat by [the]
administration from international operations that keep the peace,
provide vaccines for children, monitor rogue nuclear weapons programs,
and promote peace talks from Syria to Yemen.”
Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN for the globalist European Council on Foreign Relations, said the proposed budget cuts would create “chaos.”
Stewart Patrick, senior fellow and director of the appropriately-named program on International Institutions and Global Governance at the Council on Foreign Relations, expressed fear that the “unapologetic nationalist” Donald Trump would bring about the collapse of the UN.
“Among
the many foreign policy uncertainties created by Donald Trump’s
election, there is one prediction we can take to the bank: The United
Nations is going to get hammered,” he wrote.
While President Obama
once proclaimed himself a “citizen of the world,” Trump was elected
after rallying a “populist base deeply skeptical of international
organizations,” Patrick claimed.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
UPDATE: Bombshell – Obama Illegally Spied on Sheriff Arpaio’s Prosecution WASHINGTON,
D.C. – Infowars.com have obtained credible information from law
enforcement sources regarding individual records of U.S. citizens under
National Security Agency (NSA) electronic surveillance in the years 2004
through 2010 – a database that suggests both Donald J. Trump and Alex
Jones were under illegal, unauthorized government monitoring during
those years. LIVE COVERAGE OF NSA SPYING ON TRUMP
Michael Zullo, formerly the commander and chief investigator of the
Cold Case Posse (CCP), a special investigative group created in 2006 in
the office of Joseph M. Arpaio, formerly the sheriff in Maricopa County,
an Arizona State Certified Law Enforcement Agency, headquartered in
Phoenix, Arizona, provided sections of the database to Infowars.com.
The
electronic surveillance database, provided to Zullo by a whistleblower
in 2013, was apparently created by the NSA as part of the NSA’s illegal
and unconstitutional Project Dragnet electronic surveillance of U.S.
citizens, first revealed by news reports published in 2005, as further documented by the revelations of whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
Sheriff
Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have identified dozens of entries
at various addresses, including both Trump Tower in New York City and
Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, under which Donald Trump was
apparently under NSA electronic surveillance from 2004, during President
George W. Bush’s term of office, through 2009, the first year of
President Obama’s presidency.
Electronic surveillance of Donald Trump was listed in the database for the following companies, locations, and dates:
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump World Tower
845 United Nations Plaza, NYC, NY
No Date
Trump Tower SAL
108 Central Park, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Palace Co
200 E. 69th Street A, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Entertainment
725 Fifth Ave. FL, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Organization
725 Fifth Ave. BSM, NYC, NY
2009
Trump Palace
725 Fifth Ave., NYC, NY
2004
Mar-a-Lago Club
1100 S. Ocean BL, Palm Beach, FL
2006
Trump International
401 N. Wabash Ave., Chicago, IL
2008
Douglass Limousine
239 Nassau St., Princeton, NJ
2008
Trump International
3505 Summit BLV, West Palm Beach, FL
2004
Flights INC
P.O. Box 196, Hamilton MA
2004
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Hotels
Huron Ave., Atlantic City, NJ
No Date
Trump National
339 Pine Rd, Briarcliff, NY
No Date
Trump Plaza & C
2500 Pacific Ave, Atlantic City, NJ
2008
Trump Palace Co.
200 E. 69th St., NYC, NY
2008
Seven Springs
66 Oregon Rd, Mount Kisco, NY
2006-2008
While attempts have been made to deny such domestic surveillance, reports from the New York Times
in 2014 showed the Central Intelligence Agency had done just that by
spying on a senate panel investigating the agency’s use of “enhanced
interrogation.”
In a 2016 article from The Guardian
entitled, “‘A constitutional crisis’: the CIA turns on the Senate,” it
is likewise noted just how drastic and widespread the CIA’s domestic
surveillance operation was.
As
revealed from the Dragnet database, not only was Trump himself
surveilled but so were numerous employees of his located at Trump Tower.
Former
CIA officer Larry Johnson recently joined the Alex Jones show to
discuss how intelligence sources have stated that such surveillance of
Trump during the presidential election in fact took place.
Here is a partial list of the Trump employees that show up in the Project Dragnet database:
•
Patricia Hernandez, a Manager for the Trump Organization, was under NSA
electronic surveillance at Trump Parc, Central Park South, in New York
City, at phone 212-586-xxxx, date: 9/16/2008.
• Mike van der Goes,
a Golf Pro at Oceans Trails Golf Course in Palos Verdes, who was
promoted to be general manager when Trump bought the course from the
bank in 2005 and renamed it Trump National. Mike van der Goes was under
surveillance at Trump National, 1 Ocean TRL, Rancho Palos Verdes,
California, at phone: 310-265-xxxx, no date.
• Carolyn Kepcher, a
frequent guest on NBC’s television program “The Apprentice,” who was
under NSA electronic surveillance when she was General Manager at the
Trump National Golf Course in Briarcliff, New York, in Westchester
County north of New York City, at 339 Pine Rd., in Briarcliff, New York,
at phone 914-944-xxxx, date: 9/7/206.
• Joe Traci, a Real Estate
Property Manager at Trump New World Property Management, at 438 W. 69th
Street, New York City, phone 212-769-xxxx, date: 11/12/2008; and at 5
12th Street, New York City, phone: 212-586-xxxx, no date.
• Roger
Socio, a Senior Project Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Tower, 725
Fifth Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-715-xxxx, 2/23/2009.
•
Bill Fichter, Residents Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Palace, 200
E. 69th Street, New York City, phone: 212-879-xxxx, date: 2/24/2009.
• Florin Bogosel, Trump Park Avenue, 502 Park Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-223-xxxx, no date.
• Grace Dunne, Trump Park Residence, 3770 Barger Street, Shrub Oak, New York, phone: 914-245-xxxx, date 1/26/2006.
•
Greg Bradley, Vice President, Trump Pavilion for Nursing and
Rehabilitation, 9028 Van Wyck, East Richmond Hill, New York, phone:
718-291-xxxx, no date.
All these employees appear to have been under NSA phone surveillance, plus various of them under financial surveillance as well.
The
Project Dragnet database suggests Trump was under surveillance not only
for phone conversations, but also for financial information, including
most likely bank account transactions, credit card transactions, and tax
filings.
Both federal and state law enforcement have had access
to the Project Dragnet database, allowing widespread use for methods
such as parallel construction. The practice, outlined in the 2013 Reuters
article, “U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate
Americans,” reveals the breadth of information that trickles down to law
enforcement from high-level intelligence agencies.
Also
listed as under NSA surveillance in the period 2004-2010 was Trump’s
former wife, Ivanka Trump at House of Ivanka, 10 East 64th Street, New
York City.
The Project Dragnet database also indicates that the
NSA was conducting electronic surveillance on an extensive list of Trump
employees in the years 2004-2010 – the only years for which Sheriff
Arpaio had data.
Alex Jones is listed as being under electronic
surveillance for phone records, as well as under surveillance for
financial records, in 2006. The address listed for Alex Jones in the NSA
Project Dragnet database was correct for his residence at that time. So
too, Alex Jones confirmed the phone number listed was also correct.
Sheriff
Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have validated through law
enforcement channels the validity of the name, address, and telephone
numbers for the dates that appear in the Project Dragnet database.
Sheriff
Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo are prepared to share relevant
information with appropriate federal law enforcement agencies, including
the FBI, as well as the Department of Justice, Homeland Security
Department, the White House, and members of Congress the Project Dragnet
Database in whole, or in part, as it pertains to NSA electronic
surveillance of Donald J. Trump and his various employee.
Sheriff
Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo also show up in the database, listed
as being under both phone and financial surveillance.
Zullo
explained that he and Arpaio came in contact with the information from
Operation Dragnet during an unrelated investigation that began in
October 2013 and ended January 2015.
A whistleblower by the name
of Dennis Montgomery brought forward information that Montgomery alleges
was collected while he was employed as a subcontractor for the NSA,
working on various surveillance projects.
Court documents do
verify Montgomery was contracted by the NSA, in part to develop computer
breaching software that has been utilized in government mass
surveillance operations targeting American citizens without legal
justification.
While Montgomery’s credibility has been called into
question, Zullo maintains that the amount of information provided by
Montgomery related to Operation Dragnet was extraordinarily voluminous
and that Montgomery had shared information with investigators in 2013
that is only now being revealed by media outlets.
________________________________________________________
BREAKING! Documents Show Obama Surveiled Entire Trump Family For 8 Years
Project Dragnet gave countless government employees private data on Trump
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Alex Jones breaks down information provided exclusively to
Infowars from law enforcement sources that shows NSA surveillance of
Donald Trump, his family, his employees and countless others under
“Project Dragnet.” READ: NSA Documents Prove Surveillance of Donald Trump & His Family EXCLUSIVE! New NSA Whistleblower Goes Public About Trump Surveillance
