ISLAMIC STATE SUPPORTER DECLARES THAT CHURCHES ARE LEGITIMATE TARGETS

POPE WANTS US TO "ACCUSE OURSELVES" FOR DISRESPECTING MUSLIMS WHILE CHURCHES ARE BEING DESTROYED & CHRISTIANS KILLED?

ISLAMIC STATE SUPPORTER DECLARES THAT 

CHURCHES ARE LEGITIMATE TARGETS

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/islamic-state-supporter-declares-that-churches-are-legitimate-targets;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

“On May 2, 2019, a supporter of the Islamic State (ISIS) posted an archival screenshot of a report saying that the Vatican endorses the use of force against ISIS. Therefore, the post states, ‘The Crusaders’ churches are legitimate targets for ISIS.”

The accusation against the Vatican and Christians is patently false. In fact, in 2017, the Islamic State released a “propaganda poster of Pope Francis being , ‘beheaded’“despite the Pope bending backwards to defend Islam.

Attacks against Christians and Christian persecution is a longstanding evil, endemic and it is not based on anything more than Christians being regarded as Kaffirs. Even though Pope Francis is deemed to be an apologist for Islam, it is still not enough for the Islamic State. Nothing is enough for jihadists but complete surrender by infidels.

While the Islamic State makes reference to Christian “Crusaders”, the  Christian Crusades happened between 1096 and 1291. Compare that to the jihad war of conquest that started in the 7th century, rampaged through Christian territories, murdered, pillaged and plundered anyone and anything in its way and still continues its vision. From Muhammad to ISIS, the 1,400 year jihad war continues to this day. There is no Christian crusade going on, only excuses to continue the endeavors of Islamic supremacists.



“ISIS Supporter: Churches Are Legitimate”, MEMRI, May 2, 2019:


On May 2, 2019, a supporter of the Islamic State (ISIS) posted an archival screenshot of a report saying that the Vatican endorses the use of force against ISIS. Therefore, the post states, “The Crusaders’ churches are legitimate targets for ISIS. The Vatican has declared war on the Islamic State and supported it [this war]. Every barking hypocrite who cries crocodile tears must stick a shoe in his mouth….

____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

GLAZOV MOMENT: POPE: "LET'S ACCUSE OURSELVES"~ANTI-CHRIST, COMMUNIST JESUIT ATTEMPTS TO FOSTER WESTERN GUILT OVER "TREATMENT" OF MUSLIMS

https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2019/04/glazov-moment-pope-lets

-accuse.html

https://gellerreport.com/2017/11/beheaded-pope.html/ 


"CHRISTMAS BLOOD" THREAT FOR THE VATICAN



Robert Spencer: Why Has ISIS Threatened to Behead "the Pope of Islam"?

Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer discusses the recent threat from the Islamic State (ISIS) to behead Pope Francis, explaining how anomalous it is in light of his many statements downplaying and denying the reality of jihad terrorism.





JAMIE GLAZOV'S "JHADIST PSYCHOPATH": 

EMBRACING THE INDICTMENT OF YOUR ACCUSER 

FLAREUP IN GAZA: HAMAS & ISLAMIC JIHAD FIRE 200 ROCKETS TOWARDS ISRAEL

FLAREUP IN GAZA: HAMAS & ISLAMIC JIHAD 

FIRE 200 ROCKETS TOWARDS ISRAEL

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/flareup-in-gaza-hamas-and-islamic-jihad-fire-200-rockets-towards-israel; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Renewed fighting has escalated in Gaza: “approximately 200 rockets have been fired by Gaza militants towards Israel over the course of a few hours…In response, the IDF says it has carried out airstrikes on more than 30 militant targets in Gaza, including rocket launcher sites and other military compounds used by Hamas and Islamic Jihad.”

There’s nothing new about flareups in Gaza. The jihadist war against Israel began in 1948 and will continue until the Palestinian Authority, the PLO, Hamas and Fatah accept Israel’s right to exist, which they will never do. Each of these jihadist organizations aim to obliterate Israel in accordance with their charters, despite the ongoing lies and propaganda about: the Palestinian leadership making efforts toward a two-state solution, the so-called Israeli “occupation”, Israel “apartheid” etc.

The well-known declaration, “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free”, is an ongoing mantra which fixates on obliterating Israel from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

Each time Israel has given up land in efforts toward peace, land which it captured in defensive wars, its jihadist neighbors betrayed agreements and were instead, further emboldened.

Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, was loudly praising violent riots along the Gaza-Israel border in late March, “as tens of thousands of Palestinians massed along the border on the first anniversary of the “Great March of Return”.  Sinwar declared: “we want to bomb Tel Aviv.” Islamic Jihad is also now vowing to strike major Israeli cities. Intentions do not get clearer than that.

Such recent disturbing news does not stop there: with aid from the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hizballah has now built a new missile manufacturing facility in Beirut. Despite all, in early April, Israel again embarked on futile efforts toward peace, by negotiating an agreement with Hamas. Part of the agreement included an easing of “the restrictions on the fishing area and gradually open the Gaza crossings to allow additional goods through.” Meanwhile, Deputy Hamas leader Saleh al-Arouri emphasized that a Hamas-Israel agreement “is not a peace agreement”.

Appeasement of jihadists has never worked and will never work. It emboldens jihadist bullies.



“2 wounded as Gaza militants fire 200 rockets towards Israel: IDF”, by Andrew Carey, CNN, May 4, 2019:


Jerusalem (CNN)Approximately 200 rockets have been fired by Gaza militants towards Israel over the course of a few hours on Saturday, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

The Iron Dome aerial defense system intercepted dozens of the incoming rockets, the IDF added.

Two Israelis have been wounded, including an 80-year old woman in the city of Kiryat Gat, about twenty miles from Gaza, injured by shrapnel to her head and legs, according to Israel’s emergency response service, Magen David Adom.

In response, the IDF says it has carried out airstrikes on more than 30 militant targets in Gaza, including rocket launcher sites and other military compounds used by Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

The Palestinian Ministry of Health says one person has died as a result of the Israeli strikes, and seven others have been wounded.

Israel has also announced that it is closing the two border crossings between Israel and Gaza, as well as closing the Gaza fishing zone in light of the rocket fire.

The announcement came from the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT). The fishing zone was restricted to 6 nautical miles earlier this week following a rocket fired from Gaza that landed off the coast of Israel.

There was no specific date for when the crossings and the fishing zone would reopen.

Saturday’s rocket barrage comes less than a day after two militants from Hamas’s armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, were killed in an Israeli strike on Hamas posts in Gaza.

Israel launched airstrikes Friday after two Israeli soldiers were wounded by sniper fire along the Gaza border….

______________________________________________________________

UPDATE:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/palestinian-jihadists-fire-over-250

-rockets-into-israel-before-the-start-of-ramadan 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/600-rockets-fired-in-24-hours-trump

-declares-we-support-israel-100-in-defense-of-its-citizens

HHS ISSUES "CONSCIENCE RIGHTS IN HEALTH CARE" RULE TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS OBJECTORS TO ABORTION, ASSISTED SUICIDE

HHS ISSUES "CONSCIENCE RIGHTS IN HEALTH CARE" RULE TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS OBJECTORS TO ABORTION, ASSISTED SUICIDE

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: https://christiannews.net/2019/05/03/hhs-issues-conscience-rights-in-health-care-rule-to-protect-religious-objectors-to-abortion-assisted-suicide/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

WASHINGTON — The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced the issuance of a final rule that is meant to ensure the protection of the conscience rights of medical professionals and others who have objections to abortion or physician-assisted suicide.

“Finally, laws prohibiting government-funded discrimination against conscience and religious freedom will be enforced like every other civil rights law,” OCR Director Roger Severino said in a statement.

“This rule ensures that healthcare entities and professionals won’t be bullied out of the healthcare field because they decline to participate in actions that violate their conscience, including the taking of human life,” he explained. “Protecting conscience and religious freedom not only fosters greater diversity in healthcare, it’s the law.”

According to Severino’s office, the rule protects healthcare facilities that decline to perform or refer for abortions, as well as professionals who decline to receive training in abortion. Patients who have objections to mental health treatment of children or occupational illness testing are also protected under the law.



The updated rule provides clarification on existing federal conscience protection laws as passed by Congress, and requires healthcare entities to keep records documenting compliance with such statutes, as well as to to submit certifications to HHS that they are indeed following the law.

OCR says that the rule is necessary because some remain confused about whether or not federal or state laws require individuals to participate in abortions or sterlizations, despite the existence of protections such as the Weldon Amendment and the Coats-Snowe Amendment.

“For instance, some advocacy organizations have filed lawsuits claiming that federal or state laws require private religious entities to perform abortions and sterilizations despite the existence of longstanding conscience and anti‐discrimination protections on this topic,” the department outlined in its rule explanation.

“A patient also sued a secular public hospital for accommodating doctors’ and nurses’ religious objections to abortion in alleged violation of a state law, Washington’s Reproductive Privacy Act,” it stated.

OCR explained that it believes the rule is also needed to educate the public, to encourage those with religious convictions to remain in the healthcare industry, and to urge those whose rights may be violated to file a complaint.

According to reports, HHS received 242,000 comments from the public on the proposed rule, some of whom expressed concern that it would adversely affect women, homosexuals and those who identify as transgender.

“Denying kids health care because they have two moms is not religious liberty. Denying patients IVF because they are unmarried is not religious liberty. Denying patients surgery because they are trans is not religious liberty,” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) tweeted on Thursday. “Discrimination is not religious liberty.”

However, a number of healthcare professionals who found themselves having to choose between their job or their convictions due to employers who expected them to assist with abortions applauded the development.

“I’ll never forget the day my supervisor ignored the law and forced me to participate in an abortion. I still have nightmares about that day,” said Cathy DeCarlo in a statement released by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). “As an immigrant to America because of the freedom and opportunity I saw here, today I’m hopeful that HHS’ new rule will help make sure that no other nurses or health care professionals will be forced to go through what I did and that their rights will be protected.”

“After 28 years of working as a critical care and emergency room nurse, I never imagined my employer would force me to choose between taking the life of an unborn child and losing my job. But 11 other nurses and I were ordered to assist in abortion even though it violated our religious convictions and contradicted our calling as a medical professional to protect life,” also outlined Fe Esperanza Racpan Vinoya.

“Both New Jersey and federal law prohibited this discrimination. But those laws are only as effective as the willingness of government officials to enforce them,” she added. “Today’s rule helps enforce the law just like any other civil rights law and protect people like me who love serving our patients.”