PRESIDENT TRUMP'S "MAGA" RALLY IN EVANSVILLE, INDIANA~TRUMP FREEZES ANNUAL FEDERAL 10% PAY RAISES CITING "SERIOUS ECONOMIC CONDITIONS"

PRESIDENT TRUMP'S "MAGA" RALLY 

IN EVANSVILLE, INDIANA 

Trump freezes federal pay raises citing 'serious economic conditions'

Rep. Roger Marshall, (R-Kansas), on President Trump canceling pay raises for federal employees, the Trump administration's efforts to renegotiate U.S. trade deals, government spending.

HAMAS LINKED "CAIR" SUES FBI, CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION TO STOP COUNTER-TERROR INITIATIVES

HAMAS LINKED "CAIR" SUES FBI, CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION TO STOP COUNTER-TERROR INITIATIVES 

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/hamas-linked-cair-sues-fbi-customs-and-border-protection-to-stop-counterterror-initiatives;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

“CAIR’s challenge comes months after an annual report on the status of civil rights for Muslims in the United States, which found more Islamophobic episodes were instigated by federal agencies than either hate groups or individual bigots.”

The idea that the FBI, as cowed, clueless, and compromised as it is, is riddled with “Islamophobia” is absurd beyond measure. This lawsuit is a clear attempt to hamstring and destroy even the feeble counterterror efforts that the FBI is pursuing today, which will have the effect of clearing away still more obstacles in the way of the advancing jihad. I’ve said for years that Hamas-linked CAIR has opposed every counterterror measure that has ever been proposed or implemented, and this lawsuit is further confirmation of that fact.



“FBI, Border Patrol Bypass Hate Groups As Leading Perpetrators Of Anti-Muslim Incidents,” by Arvind Dilawar, Shadow Proof, August 28, 2018 (thanks to Marvin):


The Council on American-Islamic Relations filed suit on August 8 against Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other federal agencies, which it accuses of creating “a kind of second-class citizenship” for American Muslims.

The lawsuit argues these agencies use an interagency watchlisting system that separates American Muslims from their children, denies them employment opportunities, prevents them from traveling by air, and rejects or delays their immigration benefits.

CAIR’s challenge comes months after an annual report on the status of civil rights for Muslims in the United States, which found more Islamophobic episodes were instigated by federal agencies than either hate groups or individual bigots.

The report, based on complaints made to or investigated by CAIR, found the number of anti-Muslim incidents rose 17 percent between 2016 and 2017. It described some of the personal experiences of discrimination.

“Targeting by Customs and Border Protection” ranked within the five most prevalent kinds of abuse in 2017–a first since CAIR began issuing its annual report. CBP-related incidents outpaced even hate crimes to become the second most common type of discrimination last year.

CBP’s Islamophobia most frequently takes the form of racial profiling and invasion of privacy, explained Zainab Arain, a CAIR research and advocacy coordinator and author of the organization’s most recent civil rights report.

“Muslim travelers are often taken to secondary inspection and questioned about their background, their communication, and their contacts in the United States,” Arain shared. “They are asked religious questions that have nothing to do with the mission of CBP, which is to determine if individuals are lawfully permitted to enter the country.”

Besides being an abuse of power by CBP, Arain emphasized the unconstitutional nature of religious questioning.

“They are also seizing and searching people’s electronics at the border without probable cause,” Arain continued. “If someone refuses to unlock their device, CBP will often take it from the individual and keep it to jailbreak.”

Unlike CBP, the FBI has regularly appeared as a leading perpetrator of anti-Muslim discrimination in CAIR’s annual reports, most recently coming in fourth place.

The FBI’s targeting of Muslims most often involves unwarranted surveillance of and unjustified visits to mosques, homes, and workplaces to question people about their social networks and religious beliefs.

“Questions include: Do you know so-and-so at your masjid? Do you know anybody who is ‘radicalized?’ What do you think about such-and-such imam? What are your thoughts about this school of religious thought?” explained Arain. “Such behavior discourages Muslims from exercising their first amendment right to free practice of religion because they feel threatened.”

Taken together, federal agencies were responsible for 35 percent of all documented complaints–more than any other category, including harassment, hate crimes, and employment discrimination.

In its report, CAIR attributes this “almost unprecedented level of government hostility toward a religious minority” to the presidency of Donald Trump in general and his multiple executive orders banning Muslim travel to the U.S., which spurred 18 percent of all recorded Islamophobic incidents from 2017….

IMMIGRANTS AND DISEASE

IMMIGRANTS AND DISEASE

BY WALTER WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/immigrants-and-disease/#axzz5PlTHTnLc; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- The Immigration and Nationality Act mandates that all immigrants and refugees undergo a medical screening examination to determine whether they have an inadmissible health condition. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has technical instructions for medical examination of prospective immigrants in their home countries before they are permitted to enter the U.S. They are screened for communicable and infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis, polio, measles, mumps and HIV. They are also tested for syphilis, gonorrhea and other sexually transmitted diseases. The CDC also has medical screening guidelines for refugees. These screenings are usually performed 30 to 90 days after refugees arrive in the United States.

But what about people who enter our country illegally? The CDC specifically cites the possibility of the cross-border movement of HIV, measles, pertussis, rubella, rabies, hepatitis A, influenza, tuberculosis, shigellosis and syphilis.

Chris Cabrera, a Border Patrol agent in South Texas, warned: “What's coming over into the U.S. could harm everyone. We are starting to see scabies, chickenpox, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and different viruses.”

Some of the youngsters illegally entering our country are known to be carrying lice and suffering from various illnesses. Because there have been no medical examinations of undocumented immigrants, we have no idea how many are carrying infectious diseases that might endanger American children when these immigrants enter schools across our nation.

According to the CDC, in most industrialized countries, the number of cases of tuberculosis and the number of deaths caused by TB steadily declined during the 100 years prior to the mid-1980s. Since the '80s, immigrants have reversed this downward trend in countries that have had substantial levels of immigration from areas where the disease is prevalent.

In 2002, the CDC said: “Today, the proportion of immigrants among persons reported as having TB exceeds 50 percent in several European countries, including Denmark, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. A similar proportion has been predicted for the United States”.

The number of active TB cases among American-born citizens declined from an estimated 17,725 in 1986 to 3,201 in 2015. That was an 80 percent drop. Data reported to the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System show that the TB incidence among foreign-born people in the United States (15.1 cases per 100,000) is approximately 13 times the incidence among U.S.-born people (1.2 cases per 100,000). Those statistics refer to immigrants who are legally in the U.S. There is no way for us to know the incidence of tuberculosis and other diseases carried by those who are in our country illegally and hence not subject to medical examination.

This public health issue is ignored by all those Americans championing sanctuary cities. The public health issue is also ignored by Americans clamoring for open borders, and that includes many of my libertarian friends. By the way, in the late 19th century and early 20th century, when masses of European immigrants were trying to enter our country, those with dangerous diseases were turned back from Ellis Island. Americans hadn't “progressed” to the point of thinking that anyone in the world has a legal right to live in America. Neither did they think that it was cruel or racist to take measures to prevent our fellow Americans from catching diseases from foreigners.

But aside from diseases, there is the greater threat of welcoming to our shores people who have utter contempt for Western values and want to import anti-Western values to our country, such as genital mutilation, honor killings and the oppression of women. Many libertarian types make the argument that we would benefit from open borders when it comes to both people and goods. That vision ignores the important fact that when we import, say, tomatoes from Mexico, as opposed to people, to the U.S., they are not going to demand that we supply them with welfare benefits.

The bottom line is that we Americans have a right to decide who enters our country and under what conditions. If we forgo that right, we cease to be a sovereign nation. But that may not be important to some Americans.

---

About Walter E.Williams

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. Williams is also the author of several books. Among these are The State Against Blacks, later made into a television documentary, America: A Minority Viewpoint, All It Takes Is Guts, South Africa's War Against Capitalism, More Liberty Means Less Government, Liberty Versus The Tyranny of Socialism, and recently his autobiography, Up From The Projects.

CUYAHOGA FALLS, OHIO: NAZI EUGENICS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL-ASSIGNMENT ASKS STUDENTS TO DETERMINE WHO IS "MOST DESERVING" TO LIVE OR DIE

THE NAZI LESSON IN 

VALUE & WORTH:

"WHOM TO LEAVE BEHIND" 

(OR LET DIE)

ROBERTS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

http://www.cfalls.summit.k12.oh.us/3/Home

CUYAHOGA FALLS, OHIO: 

EUGENICS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL-

ASSIGNMENT ASKS STUDENTS 

TO DETERMINE WHO IS 

"MOST DESERVING" TO LIVE OR DIE

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/08/29/preacher-against-homosexuality-gay-athlete-assignment-asks-students-to-determine-who-is-most-deserving-to-live-or-die/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

CUYAHOGA FALLS, Ohio — A “Whom to Leave Behind” assignment given to students at a public middle school in Ohio has generated controversy as it asks youth to choose 8 people from a list of 12 whose lives will be saved in a hypothetical situation in which the Earth will be destroyed.

According to reports, the exercise was recently assigned to students at Roberts Middle School in Cuyahoga Falls and emanated from the University of Houston’s Diversity Activities Resource Guide.

“The twelve persons listed below have been selected as passengers on a spaceship for a flight to another planet because tomorrow the planet Earth is doomed for destruction,” it reads. “Due to changes in space limitations, it has now been determined that only eight persons may go.”

The assignment then asks students to select the eight who will be placed on the spaceship, ranking them by number as to who is the “most deserving.”

“On your own, take approximately 5 minutes and rank order of the passengers from one to twelve based on those who you feel are most deserving to make the trip with one being most deserving and twelve being least deserving,” it instructs.

The class is then to come together and decide as a group who will make the trip.

Those on the list are:

“An accountant with a substance abuse problem, a militant African-American medical student, a 33-year-old Native American manager who does not speak English, the accountant’s pregnant wife, a famous novelist with a physical disability, a 21-year-old female Muslim international student, a Hispanic clergyman who is against homosexuality, a female movie star who was recently the victim of sexual assault, a racist armed police officer who has been accused of using excessive force, a homosexual male professional athlete, an Asian orphaned 12-year-old boy, a 60-year-old Jewish university administrator.”

Sixth Ward Councilman Adam Miller told local television station Fox 8 Cleveland that his office has been receiving calls from concerned parents who object to the assignment. He says that he can understand the frustration as he finds the exercise as being inappropriate for children, and carrying the potential to plant prejudice and stereotypes in their minds.

“[Discussions about diversity] are important and I encourage them to continue these type of discussions, but I felt this particular assignment with some of the language used and not consulting with parents prior could lend to a lot of confusion,” Miller told the outlet, “and in my opinion, [it could] just kind of implant certain stereotypes and judgments within these young kids’ minds that they shouldn’t be having at this young age.”

“They shouldn’t have to rank these people,” also remarked parent Tia Salchak, whose son was among those given the assignment. “Everything in here is very judgmental and all these stereotypes—they are just negative stereotypes and I don’t think it’s appropriate.”

She said that her son didn’t feel comfortable with numbering anyone on the list.

While an investigation was launched into the matter and the assignment has been scrapped going forward, Superintendent Todd Nichols has also defended the exercise, outlining that it was rather meant to be a positive life lesson to promote diversity. He believes that parents have missed the point.

“With regard to the assignment recently issued by a teacher at Roberts Middle School, it is important to provide context,” he said in a statement posted to the Cayuga Falls School District website. “One of the district’s goals this year is training in the areas of diversity awareness and social justice. In this case, the intent of this assignment aligned with the goals of the district and was issued in four seventh and eighth-grade classes.”

“The intent of this lesson was to engage in an activity in diversity designed to promote tolerance and break down stereotypes,” Nichols wrote, stating that it was meant for students to better understand each other. “It is the responsibility of a 21st-century educator to deliver a holistic education to all of their students. In Cuyahoga Falls, one of our objectives is to engage in conversations concerning diversity and social justice.”

He apologized for any offense that the assignment caused.

“Unfortunately, some parents were upset and concerned by this particular assignment and thought it was not age-appropriate,” Nichols said. “The teacher and district offer their most sincere apologies for the offense caused by the content used in this assignment. Future assignments on this topic will be more carefully selected.”

The teacher who issued the exercise has been identified as Richard Perich. He has not commented to the media about the matter.

2 Peter 3:9-10 outlines that while a day of judgment is coming to the Earth, God does not desire for anyone to perish, but to repent and be saved.

“The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness, but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the Earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”

_______________________________________________________________

GUN CONTROL IN NAZI OCCUPIED FRANCE: TYRANNY & RESISTANCE-BOOK REVIEW

GUN CONTROL IN NAZI OCCUPIED FRANCE: TYRANNY & RESISTANCE-BOOK REVIEW 

BY CHRIS KNOX

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/gun-control-in-nazi-occupied-france-tyranny-resistance-book-review/#axzz5Pfkx71ZB;

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- No discussion of gun control goes for very long before someone mentions Nazis. Yet surprisingly little historical research has delved into what the Nazis actually did, both in prewar Germany and in the countries that fell before the invading Nazi armies.

With his recently-released Gun Control in Nazi-occupied France and its 2014 predecessor, Gun Control in the Third Reich. Dr. Stephen Halbrook has started mining a long-ignored vein in the history of World War II.

Gun Control in Nazi Occupied-France: Tyranny And Resistance

That historians have so carefully avoided the topic for so long is remarkable in itself. Dr. Halbrook avoids accusations, but he succeeds in gently raising the question of why the topic has been ignored. It just might be that academic backers of “common sense” restrictions on guns find it uncomfortable to see policies they favor being modeled by the archetype of totalitarian government.

Whatever the reason, the topic has gone virtually unstudied for the past seven decades. Halbrook's work is a good start on remedying that lack of scholarship.

Working from a trove of historical source documents in French and German, and from questionnaires he sent to veterans of the French Resistance, Dr. Halbrook has produced a detailed and meticulously researched picture of how the invading Nazis viewed arms in the hands of ordinary Frenchmen, and the steps they undertook to eradicate what they considered a menace to the success of their occupation.

Despite academia choosing to avoid the topic, the Nazi policies made an impression on WWII GIs and on the folks back home. The idea of “gun control” was foreign to most American ground-pounders, but they saw and heard of the atrocities committed by the Nazis against ordinary people for the crime of keeping a gun handy – proving to those unsophisticated “grunts” just how badly those guns were needed. As the Nazi blitzkrieg rolled across the low countries into France, they followed the same procedure in each town they entered. Upon subduing a town, soldiers immediately put up posters in the local language ordering that all guns be turned in, usually including threats of execution. Where registration records were available, the Nazis referred to the records and paid visits to the addresses they found there.

It was these oft-repeated, but rarely verified stories that made an impression on the American GIs, and that led to gun registration being political poison through the postwar years. One such story, this one set not in France, but in Belgium, was related by a refugee-turned-soldier, to my late father, Neal Knox. For years Dad told the story of The Belgian Corporal, usually after dinner with friends when someone asked him how he got into the fight for the Second Amendment. Dad committed the story to print only once or twice, partly because he could not substantiate the tale, and because he did not want the story to become trite.

What is undeniable is the impact that the story had on Dad and on our family. What is now also undeniable is the outline of that story, where a registered gun that could not be found led to an entire family being machine-gunned in the town square, was repeated not only in Belgium, but in France, the Netherlands, and without any doubt, in Czechoslovakia, Poland, and elsewhere.

The French gun registration law was moved into place with the best of intentions, as all such laws are.

A global depression was in full swing in 1935, and crime was high – a handy excuse for disarming the populace. The real reason, however, was that revolution was in the air, and fights between armed extremists were all too common. The French government saw it prudent to register the guns in order to confiscate them if need be. The politician who pushed the French registration law was none other than Pierre Laval, who would later lead the Vichy puppet regime, and would eventually be shot as a collaborator. The German Wehrmacht would find those registration records quite handy as they moved in to administer their new puppet state.

French Citizens Surrender Guns to Nazis

Halbrook's book details the almost comical swings between orders to turn in guns or be shot followed by amnesties to turn in guns with no questions, followed again by death threats against those who failed to report those who had guns, followed by more amnesties. I say “almost comical” because the matter was serious business. Thousands lost their lives. Trees that served as stakes where condemned gun owners were tied up and shot fell over, cut down by the daily barrages of the firing squads. Yet the French people, especially those in rural areas, defied the orders hiding their own guns or passing them on to the Resistance.

The Nazis lack of success in making France a “gun-free zone” might provide a lesson for current politicians. A good portion of Frenchmen did not give up their guns in the face of firing squads. The low rates of compliance with registration laws in California, New York, and Connecticut really should not be all that surprising.

Stephen Halbrook's Gun Control in Nazi Occupied-France: Tyranny And Resistance is an important book, one that deserves a place on the bookshelf of anyone who holds the Second Amendment dear. The history of the Nazis and their gun control should not be buried in obscure footnotes. It should be readily available and studied for the important lessons that can be learned and applied today. Halbrook's books are a great start.

HUNGARY'S PRIME MINISTER ORBAN CALLS ITALY'S MATTEO SALVINI HIS "HERO"; VOWS TO HELP ITALY DEFEND ITS BORDERS

Viktor Orban and Matteo Salvini Form United Anti-Immigration Front!!!

HUNGARY'S PRIME MINISTER ORBAN CALLS ITALY'S MATTEO SALVINI HIS "HERO"; 

VOWS TO HELP ITALY DEFEND ITS BORDERS 

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/hungarys-pm-orban-calls-italys-matteo-salvini-his-hero-vows-to-help-italy-defend-its-borders;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán met with Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini in 

Milan….. assuring Salvini of his support and telling reporters he is his “hero.”

This is the kind of cohesion needed more among Western leaders in defense of free societies. Salvini stated:

“We are close to a historic turning point for the future of Europe: today a journey of meetings begins, there will be many others….The goal is to achieve a different Europe… which puts the right to work, health, and security in the center.”

Orban also stood “shoulder to shoulder” with Poland in resisting the EU’s migrant quotas, and now he has promised “all our help” in defending Italy’s borders. One would think that the Catholic Church should take an interest in preserving the Judeo-Christian roots of Italy and its security, but instead, the Church has become one of Islam’s loudest boosters.

When Viktor Orban won his third term in April, he vowed a “big fight ahead,” and he is now in the process of building a “constitutional order based on national and Christian foundations.”



“Viktor Orban: Matteo Salvini Is ‘My Hero,’” by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, August 28, 2018:


Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán met with Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini in Milan Tuesday, assuring Salvini of his support and telling reporters he is his “hero.”
“The security of the European Union depends on Salvini’s success and we urge him not to flinch,” Mr. Orbán said, referring to Salvini’s staunch opposition to illegal immigration.

Orbán also promised “all our help” in defending Italy’s borders.

“We are close to a historic turning point for the future of Europe: today a journey of meetings begins, there will be many others,” Mr. Salvini said after the encounter. The goal is to achieve “a different Europe,” he said, which “puts the right to work, health, and security in the center.”

Prior to the meeting, Orban told journalists he is a “great admirer” of Mr. Salvini.

“He is my hero,” he said, as well as calling him “a companion of my destiny.”

Earlier Tuesday, Salvini singled out both Hungary’s impressive economic reform and its effective immigration policies under the Orbán government as a model for Italy and Europe.

“At this point the left exists only to insult me and defend a banker-led EU and boundless immigration,” Salvini tweeted Tuesday before meeting with Mr. Orbán in Milan.

“In Hungary, unemployment is under 5 percent, the flat tax for business is at 9 percent and at 15 percent for individuals, immigration is under control, and the economy has been growing at 4 percent,” he added…..

CARDINAL: POPE HAS "BIGGER AGENDA" THAN DEALING WITH SEX ABUSE SCANDAL, SUCH AS "PROTECTING MIGRANTS"

FINDING PRIEST MOLESTORS 

IS LIKE 

"GOING DOWN A RABBIT HOLE"

THE "BIGGER AGENDA"?

JOVIALITY WHILE PEOPLE ARE BEING ABUSED & KILLED

POPE NOT LIKED BECAUSE HE'S A LATINO? 

NO, BECAUSE HE'S A RADICAL COMMUNIST/GLOBALIST, APOSTATE ANTI-CHRIST FALSE TEACHER

CARDINAL: POPE HAS "BIGGER AGENDA" 

THAN DEALING WITH SEX ABUSE SCANDAL, SUCH AS "PROTECTING MIGRANTS"

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/cardinal-pope-has-bigger-agenda-than-dealing-with-sex-abuse-scandal-such-as-protecting-migrants; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Protecting Catholics and others who are brutalized or even killed by Muslim migrants? No, that’s not part of the Pope’s “bigger agenda.”

But it is a real concern. Somali Muslim migrant Mohammad Barry in February 2016 stabbed multiple patrons at a restaurant owned by an Israeli Arab Christian; Ahmad Khan Rahami, an Afghan Muslim migrant, in September 2016 set off bombs in New York City and New Jersey; Arcan Cetin, a Turkish Muslim migrant, in September 2016 murdered five people in a mall in Burlington, Washington; Dahir Adan, another Somali Muslim migrant, in October 2016 stabbed mall shoppersin St. Cloud while screaming “Allahu akbar”; and Abdul Razak Artan, yet another Somali Muslim migrant, in November 2016 injured nine people with car and knife attacks at Ohio State University. 72 jihad terrorists have come to the U.S. from the countries listed in Trump’s initial immigration ban.

What’s more, all of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered Europe as refugees. In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. The Lebanese Education Minister said in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country. On May 10, 2016, Patrick Calvar, the head of France’s DGSI internal intelligence agency, said that the Islamic State was using migrant routes through the Balkans to get jihadis into Europe.

Is it really a Christian requirement to be in favor of one’s home country committing cultural suicide?

In spreading his nonsense, the Pope is endangering his own people, particularly in light of the papal idolatry that is rampant in the Catholic Church today.

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“Raw Interview: Cardinal Cupich Responds to Questions About Cardinal McCarrick and Bombshell Vigano Memo,” by Mary Ann Ahern, NBC Chicago, August 28, 2018:

Cardinal Blase Cupich spoke to NBC 5 about the explosive allegations of a former high-ranking church official who claims the Pope knew about charges of sexual misconduct against an American cardinal and says that cardinal was responsible for Cupich’s appointment in Chicago.

“The Pope has a bigger agenda,” Cardinal Cupich said. “He’s got to get on with other things, of talking about the environment and protecting migrants and carrying on the work of the church. We’re not going to go down a rabbit hole on this….Quite frankly they also don’t like him because he’s a Latino.”

MSNBC, CNN DEFEND ANTIFA, CLAIM TRUMP ‘RATIONALIZES’ AND ‘URGES’ VIOLENCE

MSNBC, CNN DEFEND ANTIFA, CLAIM TRUMP ‘RATIONALIZES’ AND ‘URGES’ VIOLENCE

Fake news reporters say Antifa violence is Trump voters’ conspiracy theory

BY STEVE WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/msnbc-cnn-defend-antifa-claim-trump-rationalizes-and-urges-violence/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Following remarks made by President condemning Antifa as a violent group who may seek to ‘overturn’ his administration’s policies, CNN and MSNBC both aired programming that directly defended the notorious leftist group and claimed that it is Trump who is really the purveyor of violence.

At a dinner with evangelical leaders, the president said the following:

“It’s not a question of like or dislike, it’s a question that they will overturn everything that we’ve done and they will do it quickly and violently. And violently. There is violence. When you look at Antifa- these are violent people.”

Despite the countless examples of Antifa engaging in violence toward its political ends, MSNBC host Chuck Todd insisted that the President was echoing crazed “conspiracies” of “Trump voters” and claimed Antifa was only “an issue in Portland, Oregon” and “some places else,” adding “this is not a giant issue.”

“If it’s Tuesday, President Trump is warning there will be violence if Republicans lose the midterms,” Todd said, adding “the President is apparently trying to scare voters into wanting to support the GOP.”

“I think he just wants to rationalize violence,” Todd declared.

It’s no surprise that Todd attempted to dismiss Antifa, given that a year ago he allowed noted Antifa supporter Mark Bray to advocate the group’s extremism on his broadcast.

Over at CNN, before analyst Jeffrey Toobin ridiculously asserted it was racist to criticize Antifabecause they are a “widely perceived as an African-American organization,” leftist talking head Angela Rye described Antifa as the right’s “favorite boogeyman”.

When Rye asked Pro-Trump commentator Steve Cortes for examples of times when Antifa has engaged in violence, he started to reel them off, which angered her into the default leftist position of ‘Trump is a violent racist’.

“I’m sorry that you didn’t want to answer the way that I hoped you would, which was honestly and that was with a number,” Rye said to Cortes.

“That’s how the left operates, isn’t it? If I answer the way you want, you’re tolerant of my view. Otherwise, you’re not tolerant. Because that’s liberal intolerance.” Cortes shot back.

Rye stated that rather then Antifa, it is Trump who “consistently urges violence” and “consistently trolls women of color on Twitter”.

Paul Joseph Watson

✔@PrisonPlanet

Trump warns in private conversation that Antifa are "violent people" (a completely factual statement).

Media: Trump is threatening violence!

9:07 PM - Aug 28, 2018

• 1,901
• 630 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

CNN even defends Antifa when the group violently attacks journalists, then claims that it is Trump who is encouraging violence against reporters.

CNN INTERVIEW DERAILED AFTER GUEST, FORMER NEW HAMPSHIRE GOVERNOR JOHN SUNUNU, REFUSES TO BASH TRUMP DURING MCCAIN TRIBUTE

CNN INTERVIEW DERAILED AFTER GUEST REFUSES TO BASH TRUMP DURING 

MCCAIN TRIBUTE

‘I’m not here to play the political games that some of the press want to play’

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/cnn-interview-derailed-after-guest-refuses-to-bash-trump-during-mccain-tribute/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

A CNN interview meant to pay tribute to the late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) went off the rails after host Alisyn Camerota tried to turn the segment into a Trump bashing event.

CNN invited former New Hampshire Governor John Sununu on Monday to discuss McCain’s life, but the interview took a bizarre turn after Camerota brought up the White House not issuing an official statement on McCain’s passing.

Sununu, who also served as Chief of Staff under former President George H.W. Bush, criticized CNN and liberal media for making McCain’s passing about Trump and not about honoring McCain.

“That was printed in the Washington Post,” Sununu said. “And I have to be honest with you, I don’t give much credence to what I read –”

“We also have that reporting,” Camerota said.

“Yeah, well, same thing applies, Alisyn.”

That triggered Camerota, who appeared to control her anger as she took a deep breath and long pause.

“Governor…” Camerota said, “…you come on CNN, and we appreciate you coming on CNN and we appreciate your take on it. But I don’t appreciate you denigrating our reporting. We have excellent reporters here.”

She went on to ask Sununu if he was choosing not to believe CNN’S reporting.

“You asked me to come on to talk about John McCain,” Sununu said. “I’m here to talk about John McCain as I remember him. I’m not here to talk about the press’s handling of a difference between the White House and the press corps at this time.”

“It’s not the press’s handling, it’s President Trump’s handling of John McCain’s death,” Camerota snapped.

Sununu went on to say McCain was a “great American,” and that he didn’t come on CNN to “play political games that some of the press want to play.”

“Just to be clear, we don’t see it as a game,” Camerota said.

“Eh,” Sununu responded.

---

THE SOCIAL MEDIA PURGE OF CONSERVATIVES IS A GIANT ELECTION MEDDLING SCHEME

THE SOCIAL MEDIA PURGE OF CONSERVATIVES IS A GIANT ELECTION MEDDLING SCHEME

Big Tech war on free speech is a ‘resistance’ plot

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/the-social-media-purge-of-conservatives-is-a-giant-election-meddling-scheme/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

It can no longer be denied that there is a coordinated, sustained agenda to censor and silence conservatives by social media Silicon Valley giants as part of a giant election meddling scheme.

It is widely acknowledged that Facebook and Google both backed both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the last two presidential elections.

Obama’s former campaign director openly admitted Facebook was “on our side” during the 2012 campaign.

Wikileaks emails also reveal that Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg wanted Hillary Clinton to win “badly” and visited her multiple times.

The Podesta emails also prove “a relationship with Schmidt dating back to at least 2008 and show that Google loaned its jet to members of Clinton’s campaign staff on several occasions.”

It is also documented that there are at least 45 Facebook employees who, “had previously worked or volunteered with the Hillary campaigns, the Obama campaigns, or the Obama White House and are now employed by Facebook, Facebook-owned companies, or the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.”

These political connections demolish the “it’s just a private company” argument and they also illustrate how the silencing of conservatives is a deliberate effort to help the Democrats’ election prospects.

A leaked internal Facebook message board post also revealed how conservatives within the company have become irate at its censorious nature.

“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” said the post. “We claim to welcome all perspectives, but are quick to attack — often in mobs — anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology.”

While CNN claims that censorship of conservatives is a conspiracy theory and that President Trump’s claim that Big Tech silencing independent voices is “false,” the multitude of evidence suggests otherwise.

Just look at the sheer number of right-leaning commentators, political candidates and news outlets that have been hit with bans, suspensions or other censorship.

– Alex Jones: Banned by Facebook, YouTube (Google), Apple, Spotify and numerous other tech platforms all within one 48 period.

– Congressional candidate Elizabeth Heng: campaign ads banned by Facebook and Twitter.

– Roger Stone: Banned by Twitter.

– Gavin McInnes & the Proud Boys: Banned by Twitter over spurious claims of “supporting violence” and being an “extremist group,” despite McInnes and his Proud Boy group repeatedly disavowing violence.

– Prager University: Repeatedly censored by YouTube.

– Diamond and Silk: Repeatedly suspended by Facebook.

– Robert Spencer: Mastercard pressured Patreon to remove Spencer’s payment processing facility on unsupported accusations of violence-promotion.

– Alveda King: Facebook censored paid ads for a pro-life campaign.

– Britanny Pettibone: Banned by Patreon.

– Lauren Southern: Banned by Patreon.

– Laura Loomer: Banned by Facebook after confronting a Muslim political candidate.

– Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn: Twitter censored a campaign ad in which Blackburn criticized Planned Parenthood.

– CJ Pearson: Facebook account locked for posting a video supporting Rudy Giuliani’s criticisms of Obama.

– Hunter Avellone: Banned by Twitter.

– Elizabeth Johnston (Activist Mommy): Suspended by Twitter “after she criticized a Teen Vogue editor who approved of publishing an article that encouraged youth to have anal sex.”

– Chicks on the Right: Suspended by Facebook.

– Owen Benjamin: Banned by Twitter for insulting David Hogg.

– Tommy Robinson: Banned by Twitter for the vague accusation of “hateful conduct”.

– Sargon of Akkad: Banned by Twitter.

– Pamela Geller: Repeatedly suspended by Facebook.

– Milo Yiannopolous: Banned by Twitter before the 2016 election for stridently criticizing a Ghostbusters movie and one of its stars, Leslie Jones.

– Swedish right-wing political parties: YouTube has repeatedly deleted right-wing content on the eve of Sweden’s national election.

This list is by no means exhaustive. There are innumerable other examples.

Let’s also recall James O’Keefe’s exposé which showed eight current and former Twitter employees explaining steps the social media giant takes to censor political content they don’t like.

While some anti-war and libertarian or left-leaning personalities and accounts have been censored, the overwhelming majority of individuals and organizations affected have been conservatives.

As Allum Bokhari writes, “These individuals all had hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions of followers on their social media accounts prior to being banned. Their social media platforms served as organizing hubs for petitions, fundraisers, rallies, and other political activities of the grassroots right. The loss of their social media accounts will have a major impact on the ability of conservatives and right-wingers to organize its online supporters for the U.S. midterm elections and beyond.”

It can no longer be denied that this represents a deliberate effort to deplatform conservatives and purge them from what is now the de facto public square in order to help Democrats win the next two elections. This is election meddling.

This is taking place as a result of lobbying by mainstream media networks like CNN to shut down their competition, brigading by left-wing Soros front groups like Media Matters, and Democratic lawmakers.

Just a month before Infowars was banned by Facebook and YouTube, Democratic Congressman Ted Deutch (D-FL) demanded that Facebook and YouTube ban Infowars.

This is not just private companies enforcing their terms of service, this is coordinated conspiracy by Big Media, Big Tech and Democratic Party lawmakers to silence their political adversaries.

Studies have shown that algorithmic changes alone, the very type that Trump complained about in his tweets this week, can shift millions of votes in elections.

Action must be taken.

A new White House petition has been launched calling on Trump to pressure Congress to pass legislation that will protect free speech rights online.

Please sign it right here. Once the petition passes 100,000 signatures, the White House will be forced to respond.

In addition to the petition, with the help of top media lawyers, Infowars has drawn up a series of recommendations to be sent to the Trump administration that will help protect free speech online.

Suggestions include directing the Justice Department to open investigations into whether there are First Amendment & anti-trust law violations by the major social media platforms. Trump could also set up a Presidential Commission made up of free speech experts to advise him on future action.

Read the memo below.

De-Platforming Memo – Action Items by Editor on Scribd

We have also produced a lengthy special report on social media censorship of conservatives that can be read below in its entirety.

The Censorship Master Plan Decoded by kitdaniels on Scribd

Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please share this video on your own Facebook page to help us fight censorship.