THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
DOWNINGTOWN, Pa. (NBC 10)—
An assistant principal at Downingtown STEM Academy in Chester County
has been placed on administrative leave after a video surfaced of him
yelling at pro-life teenagers last Friday.
The video, posted on YouTube by one of the teens, showed a heated
verbal exchange between Dr. Zach Ruffs and a 16-year-old protesting the
“holocaust of abortion.”
The argument transpired as students were leaving school for the day.
Ruff appeared to be directing traffic away from the school when the
incident was recorded.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Mainstream media outlets are (even more) furious at Marine Le
Pen and her party, Front National, for restricting their access to her
campaign, issuing a petition announcing their indignation, while failing
to condemn Emmanuel Macron for blocking Russian press.
In an open letter endorsed by more than 30 media outlets on the website for French publication Le Monde,
the vicious globalist mouthpieces who have treated Le Pen and her
supporters with disdain and dishonesty, accuse Front National of
hindering their “freedom to do their job,” and refer to themselves as
“victims” of mistreatment.
“On the occasion of the campaign for
the second round of the presidential election, the National Front
decided to choose the media that are authorized to follow Marine Le
Pen,” reads the petition.
“Several titles of press thus saw their representative kept away from
any information and any possibility of follow-up on the ground with the
candidate of the National Front.”
“We protest in the strongest possible way against this hindrance to the freedom to do our job and fulfill our duty to inform.”
“It
is not up to any political party to decide on the media empowered to
exercise their democratic role in our society,” it concludes.
Meanwhile, Le Pen’s opponent, former Rothschild banker Emmanuel Macron, has chosen to ban RT and Sputnik, both Russian, without backlash from the same journalists whinging about ‘freedom of the press’ in their petition.
“Spreading lies methodically and systematically – that’s a problem,” said a Macron spokesman of the two outlets, accusing them of a “systematic desire to issue fake news and false information.” RT’s editor-in-chief, Margarita Simoyan, slammed the Macron campaign on social media,
writing, “So this is how gracelessly freedom of speech ends in a
country which prides itself on its freedoms almost more than it prides
itself on its Camembert and brie.”
Even in The Guardian’s coverage
on the matter, they propagated the falsehood that Le Pen is a
‘far-right leader’ – deliberately duplicitous terminology intended to
paint mainline anti-globalists such as Donald Trump, Nigel Farage, and
Le Pen as ‘extremists.’
After securing her spot in the election
run-off in Sunday’s first round of voting, Le Pen issued a video
thanking her supporters on social media for their “sincere engagement”
and for tirelessly battling against media dishonesty.
Marine le Pen thanks social media users for rejecting FAKE News & honors REAL People fighting 4 her! #LePenpic.twitter.com/B9q62kaKzS
“You
actively participate in the campaign with creativity, energy, humor,”
she said. “You intelligently resist the propaganda and the lies spread
by the system’s media.”
“Everywhere, every day, on the Internet and in the real world, new patriots are joining us and committing to our side.”
“There
are a couple of days of intense mobilization remaining, like before the
first found, but perhaps now even more, as the system is going to
unleash all its weapons against the patriots: the caricatures, the
compromises of truth, maneuvers; nothing will be spared against us,” she
continued. “So, it is upon you, therefore, that I count on, on this
home stretch, to bring back the truth every time it’s necessary, to
convince and show all our compatriots that my project is to protect
them.”
Le
Pen made it into round two, despite the best efforts of international
media, the French Government, the EU and Macron's friend Obama pic.twitter.com/XihQx9jLlN
— J Deplorable Valette (@Jean_de_Valette) April 23, 2017
The decision by Front National is reminiscent of similar measures
taken by Donald Trump’s campaign to exclude outlets, at times, that
constantly attack their candidate with lies, propaganda, and deception,
such as CNN and the New York Times. Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Trump can put an end to Obamacare on his own, without requiring Congress to take any action at all.
How is this possible?
All
President Trump must do to “repeal” Obamacare is sign an Executive
Order instructing the Solicitor General to withdraw the Obama
administration’s appeal in the federal district court case U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell, (130 F. Supp. 3d 53, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 2016).
The
result will be to immediately defund the low-income insurance company
subsidies being paid by the federal government under Section 1402 of the
Affordable Care Act (ACA), causing Obamacare to collapse, almost
immediately.
The point is Congress never funded any taxpayer funds
to pay the low-income insurance subsidies that are at the heart of
making the ACA work.
What is at issue is Section 1402
of the ACA – a section written to provide federal subsidies to
insurance companies for insurance purchased on state insurance exchanges
to cover the difference between the capped maximum a low-income
purchaser could be expected to pay and the amount the insurance cost.
Without funds provided by Congress to pay the low-income insurance subsidies under 1402, Obamacare collapses almost immediately.
No insurance company can long afford to provide low-income health
insurance at a discount, unless the federal government pays the
difference between what the insurance truly costs and the limited amount
low-income purchasers can pay.
The problem is that Congress
refused to pass an appropriation to fund Section 1402, leaving the Obama
administration scrambling to find funds somewhere else in the federal
budget that could be diverted to pay the low-income insurance subsidies.
Infowars.com has proved
through an analysis of the Treasury Department balance sheets that the
Obama administration found a solution in August 2012, when the Treasury
Department decided that earnings confiscated from the
Government-Sponsored Entities (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the
“Net Worth Sweep” (NWS), could be diverted to pay the ACA low-income
insurance subsidies.
The record contained in the Treasury
Department balance sheets shows through 2013 a direct diversion of the
NWS into line items used to fund Obamacare.
After 2013, the Obama
administration continued the NWS (ultimately confiscating some $260
billion from Fannie and Freddie), but the one-for-one diversion of the
Fannie and Freddie funds going into line items used to fund Obamacare is
less clear, suggesting Treasury grew more clever after 2013 in hiding
the diversion within the Treasury general account used as a slush fund.
The
House of Representatives filed a federal district court case against
then Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell to stop
the Obamacare from diverting federal funds to pay the ACA low-income
subsidies.
On May 12, 2016, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer, in the case U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell, ruled against Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell.
Judge
Collyer decided HHS Secretary Burwell had no constitutional authority
to divert funds Congress appropriated to one section of the ACA to fund
Obamacare subsidy payments to insurers under another section of the ACA,
Section 1402 – the clause defining the insurer subsidies – when
Congress specifically declined to appropriate any funds to Section 1402
for paying the insurance subsidy.
“Paying out Section 1402 reimbursements without an appropriation thus violates the Constitution,” Judge Collyer concluded.
“Congress
authorized reduced cost sharing but did not appropriate monies for it,
in the Fiscal Year 2014 budget or since,” she stressed.
The Obama administration appealed the District Court decision in U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell
to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, deciding on its own authority
that federal funds could continue to be diverted from other budgetary
purposes to continue paying the insurance subsidies as long as the case
was under appeal.
The point is that if the Trump administration
simply decided to drop the Circuit Court appeal in Burwell, the District
Court decision would become established law.
The result would be
the Trump administration would be forbidden from diverting federal funds
to pay the ACA insurance subsidies, with the result Obama care would
implode.
“The Obama administration appealed the decision, but if
the Trump administration were to drop that appeal, the subsidies would
disappear,” commented Julie Rovner, Kaiser Health News, in an article published on April 9, 2017.
If
insurance companies were forced to take a loss by absorbing the cost
above what low-income insured could afford to pay for the insurance
coverage required under Obamacare, no insurance company could afford to
provide health insurance to low-income insureds under the ACA.
Once President Trump withdraws the Obama administration appeal in U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell, Obamacare becomes history.
To
revive Obamacare, Congress would have to pass a resolution funding ACA
Section 1402, something even RINOs like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell
might find politically suicidal to do.
______________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The United Nations is again acting as a wannabe global government and perverting the meaning of human rights,
warning the Trump administration in a bizarre letter that repealing the
unconstitutional ObamaCare takeover of health insurance may violate
what the UN likes to call “international law.” However, critics were
quick to ridicule the UN and its alleged legal reasoning. Instead of
acquiescing, they called for the U.S. government to withdraw from the scandal-plagued, dictator-controlled UN “Human Rights Council” altogether.
The UN's legal "reasoning" was based on a number of unconstitutional
international agreements, some of which have never even been ratified by
the U.S. government. According to a UN “special rapporteur,” abolishing
the so-called Affordable Care Act (ACA) would represent a violation of
the UN's “Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” As The New American has documented extensively, the UN document perverts the very meaning of rights and stands in direct contradiction to American notions of God-given, unalienable rights enshrined in America's founding documents.
The UN also pointed to other obscure global agreements, including at
least one that the U.S. government never even ratified. And yet, the UN
has nonetheless weaponized the unratified scheme to dictate policy to nations around the world, and especially the United States.
Despite the UN's bogus claims, however, the U.S. Constitution remains
the Supreme Law of the Land in the United States. That means any
international agreements that conflict with it are null and void by
definition. The authors of the U.S. Constitution and even the U.S.
Supreme Court have made that crystal clear.
The threatening UN letter in question,
dated February 2, was sent to the U.S. government mission to the UN in
Geneva by Dainius Puras (shown), the UN “Special Rapporteur on the right
of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of
physical and mental health.” And yes, that is his real title. He serves
the almost comically discredited UN “Human Rights Council,” which, in
addition to being run by a discredited prince from an Islamic
dictatorship, is literally dominated by mass-murdering dictators and brutal autocrats infamous for their human-rights abuses. In the letter, Puras, a Lithuanian psychiatrist, warns of his
“serious concerns” about efforts to repeal ObamaCare. Among other UN
instruments he describes falsely as “international law,” Puras points to
Article 25 of the UN “human rights” declaration, which purports to
mandate government healthcare. “Everyone has the right to a standard of
living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his
family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary
social services,” it says, fundamentally perverting the meaning of
rights as they have always been understood in the Christian West and the
United States in particular.
If Puras had gone down a bit further to Article 29 of that same UN declaration,
he would have seen that any of the pseudo-“human rights” the UN
purports to bestow on lowly humans can be revoked or limited under
virtually any pretext — including, presumably, the phony “right” to take
other people's money for whatever purpose. That same Article 29 also
makes clear that the UN's pseudo-rights do not extend to opposing the
UN's globalist agenda. “These rights and freedoms may in no case be
exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United
Nations,” the declaration says in clear language.
Puras claimed in the letter that the bizarre UN “human rights”
document — a massive threat to the U.S. Constitution and the freedoms it
protects — has “become a source and expression of international
customary law.” He did not explain how or when that happened, or who
supposedly gave approval for it on behalf of the American people. Next,
the UN “rapporteur” claimed that “all States, including the United
States of America, are obliged to protect and guarantee the rights
therein.” Of course, in the real world, the U.S. government is
explicitly prohibited by the Constitution from doing much of what Puras
claims is obligatory.
Separately, the UN bureaucrat pointed to Article 12 of the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESC).
While acknowledging that the U.S. government has not ratified that
scheme, he claimed the U.S. government is nevertheless “obliged to
refrain from acts that would defeat the covenant’s object or purpose.”
In other words, even though Americans never agreed to the scheme through
their elected officials, in the UN's view, they must comply anyway.
Self-government, then, would be a thing of the past if the UN were to
get its way.
Finally, the extremist UN “rapporteur” cited the “International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.”
That scheme purportedly requires that national governments and
dictatorships “guarantee the right of everyone,” including “the rights
to public health, medical care, social security and social services,”
without regard to race or color. Of course, the Constitution does not
authorize the federal government to provide healthcare to everyone, so
without a constitutional amendment delegating such authority to
Washington, D.C., that power is reserved to the states or the people.
The U.S. government is legally prohibited from expanding its powers
using treaties.
Of course, despite the UN's latest false claims purporting to decree
“international laws,” the UN Charter — even assuming it were a
legitimate document — specifically prohibits UN interference in domestic
issues. “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the
United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the
domestic jurisdiction of any state,” Article 2 (7) of the UN Charter explains clearly. If healthcare is not a domestic issue, nothing is.
And yet, Puras claimed not only the authority to meddle, but the duty
to do so. “It is my responsibility, under the mandates provided me by
the Human Rights Council, to seek to clarify all cases brought to my
attention,” he wrote, demanding that the letter be shared with
congressional leaders and other U.S. officials. He also demanded more
information from the Trump administration, including what policies might
be put in place after ObamaCare is repealed, so he could see whether
they conform to “international law.”
Finally, the bureaucrat, who was raised under a brutal communist
system and so might be forgiven for not understanding liberty, brazenly
threatened U.S. officials. Among other threats, he demanded that Trump
officials take “all necessary interim measures to prevent the alleged
violations” and to “ensure adequate measure [sic] to prevent their
occurrence as well as to guarantee the accountability of any person
responsible of [sic] the alleged violations.” What sort of
“accountability” he had in mind for the alleged perpetrators was not
specified.
And in the meantime, the UN rapporteur warned that he would “publicly
express” his “concerns” in the “near future.” The Trump
administration's response will be presented to the dictator-controlled
UN “Human Rights Council” for its “consideration,” Puras concluded. The
council is made up of 47 governments, including many of the most savage
communist and Islamist dictatorships that have collectively murdered
many tens of millions of people.
UN “High Commissioner for Human Rights” Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, an
Islamic prince who oversees the UN “Human Rights” apparatus, has long
been a lightning rod for criticism and ridicule as well. Last year, for
example, he claimed that “international law” supposedly “requires” that “robust gun control” be imposed on the United States, apparently unaware that the U.S. Constitution specifically prohibits that. More recently, during the U.S. election, Hussein viciously
attacked then-candidate Donald Trump, warning that he was a “threat” to
the world and equating his tactics with those of ISIS.
And that is just the start. Hussein also played a key role in protecting
child-raping UN “peace” troops while persecuting the whistleblowers,
such as Anders Kompass, who tried to stop it and protect the children. And in February, it emerged that Hussein and other UNHCHR bureaucrats had persecuted a whistleblower who exposed UNHCHR officials identifying dissidents to the Communist Chinese dictatorship,
also a member of the UN “Human Rights Council” despite murdering more
human beings than any government in human history. Several of those
dissidents were kidnapped and killed following the leaks. And Hussein
punished the whistleblower, instead.
The UN's legions of discredited “special rapporteurs,” meanwhile,
have also developed a reputation for idiocy. In the United Kingdom, for
example, a nutty UN special rapporteur infamous for sacrificing an
animal to Karl Marx was
relentlessly ridiculed for accusing the U.K. government of “human
rights violations” because welfare recipients were not being given large
enough houses. In Switzerland, the UN bureaucrats attacked stay-at-home mothers as a human-rights violation. In Canada, they claimed supposedly “low” taxes were a “human rights” violation. In Japan, free speech was a violation. In America, virtually
everything from gun rights and regulations on killing preborn babies to
child discipline, self-defense protections and even the name of a
sports team has been called a “human rights” violation by UN officials. Indeed, as The New American has documented in detail, the UN now poses a grave threat to U.S. independence and self-government.
But critics were quick to lambaste the UN's latest meddling in U.S.
healthcare. “Not a single taxpayer dollar should be wasted on replying
to the questions submitted by the Special Rapporteur,” wrote Joseph
Klein, author of Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom.
“And if he should issue a critical press release, as he has threatened
to do, in advance of his presumably critical report to the UN Human
Rights Council, this will provide yet another reason for the Trump
administration to pull out of the dysfunctional, misnamed Human Rights
Council and to withdraw funding.”
Even the far-left Washington Post writer who first broke the
story, Dana Milbank, appeared to ridicule the notion that the UN would
or could impose its will on America. “None of this, of course, will
deter President Trump and congressional Republicans, who are again
attempting to get a repeal bill through the House,” he wrote, saying the
letter was of “questionable” legal value despite his obvious support
for ObamaCare. “They scoff at lectures from U.N. bureaucrats,
particularly on domestic affairs, and the world body has no practical
way to impose its will on Congress. There’s also a logical question: If
repealing Obamacare violates international law, wasn’t the country in
violation before Obamacare?”
A better course of action than simply ignoring or ridiculing the UN's
outrageous meddling in U.S. affairs, though, would be to have the U.S.
government withdraw from the UN entirely in an “Amexit.” Already,
legislation to do that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 193),
is sitting the House Foreign Affairs Committee of Congress awaiting
action. With sufficient public pressure, lawmakers would have no choice
but to pass it — and that pressure is growing stronger every day. If
anything, the fact that the UN and its largely dictatorial member
regimes oppose the repealing of ObamaCare is yet another excellent
reason why Congress must get it done as quickly as possible. The UN is a
tool of tyrants and must be evicted from America.
NOT AT ALL SUITED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. IN THE FUTURE
As is custom, Pence removed his shoes while wife Karen Pence and daughters Audrey and Charlotte also donned headscarves. COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREENWOOD, PENCES' APOSTATE EMERGING CHURCH:http://v3.ccgonline.org/ "BUT ONCE A CATHOLIC, ALWAYS A CATHOLIC"
“Pence Visits Mosque, Declares Indonesia’s Moderate Islam ‘an Inspiration to the World,'” by Bridget Johnson, PJ Media, April 20, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):
Vice President Mike Pence visited the Istiqlal mosque in
Jakarta today during the first visit by a Trump administration official
to Indonesia.
The Masjid Istiqlal, the
largest mosque in southeast Asia that can accommodate 200,000
worshipers, is the same one President Obama and first lady Michelle
Obama visited during Obama’s 2010 trip to the world’s most populous
Muslim country.
As is custom, Pence removed his shoes while wife Karen Pence and daughters Audrey and Charlotte also donned headscarves.
The family met Grand Imam Haji
Nasaruddin Umar and other officials, toured the prayer hall and saw how
the five-times-a-day call to prayer is done.
Pence then joined and spoke at a
closed-door interfaith dialogue with representatives from Christianity,
Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism and Islam.
At Merdeka Palace remarks with
Indonesian President Joko Widodo before the mosque tour, Pence said
President Trump “sent me here as a sign of the high value the United
States places on our strategic partnership with Indonesia.”
“As the second and third
largest democracies in the world, our two countries share many common
values — including freedom, the rule of law, human rights, and religious
diversity,” he said. “The United States is proud to partner with
Indonesia to promote and protect these values, the birthright of all
people.”
Pence talked about multiple
areas of cooperation, including leveling the playing field “to ensure
that American exporters can fully participate in the Indonesia market,
the same freedom that Indonesia exporters have had in many sectors in
the United States for many years.”
“The United States is also
proud to be one of Indonesia’s oldest and most engaged defense partners.
And under President Trump we are firmly committed to continuing to
collaborate on the security of both of our peoples. A stronger defense
partnership will serve us well as we confront the various security
threats and challenges that we now face. And of course, one of the
greatest threats we face is the rise and spread of terrorism,” he added.
“…Finally, with President
Trump’s leadership, the United States intends to deepen our cultural
ties with the nation and the good people of Indonesia. Later today I’m
greatly humbled to have the privilege to visit Indonesia’s national
mosque, where I’ll have the opportunity to speak with leaders of many
faiths. And, Mr. President, I’m very much looking forward to that visit
and that honor.”
Pence noted that “the largest
majority Muslim country, Indonesia’s tradition of moderate Islam,
frankly, is an inspiration to the world.”
“In your nation, as in mine,
religion unifies — it doesn’t divide. It gives us hope for a brighter
future, and we are all grateful for the great inspiration that Indonesia
provides for the world,” the vice president added. “Rest assured, under
President Trump, the United States welcomes all who share our values
and strive for that brighter future.”…
Pence later sat with several faith leaders in a conference room where a
speaker gave Pence an overview of the mosque's history. The mosque,
which can accommodate up to 200,000 people, was designed by a Protestant
and sits near a Catholic cathedral in central Jakarta.
Mike Pence's daughter's Charlotte, left, and Audrey, right, sat with
President Widodo's daughter Kahiyang Ayu, center, during the visit to
the Presidential Palace in Jakarta
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
"Current federal law criminalizes the practice of FGM, but
does not specifically require reporting on it, though health care
providers are obligated to report instances of child abuse, a category
in which FGM falls"
Female genital mutilation is gratuitous violence against girls and
women, and is a violation of human rights; failing to report it not only
ensures its continuance but also perpetuates a two-tier legal system in
America: one in which Islamic Sharia is permitted and another under the
rule of secular law.
When one takes into consideration the shocking cover-up of the sexual
assault by Muslim “grooming gangs” of up to a million girls in the
U.K., as police and public welfare officials turned a blind eye for fear
of being branded “Islamophobic” or racist, it is clear that some areas
are already under a two-tier legal system of Sharia and democracy. The
West continues to lose its values in the interests of appeasing Muslims
and will continue to do so unless this double standard is seriously
challenged. Let’s hope that American law will change in order to force
reporting of this dreadful abuse of women in light of this first FGM
case in America, in which two Michigan doctors, Dr. Jumana Nagarwala and
Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, and Attar’s wife Farida (a medical office
manager) were indicted this week by a Detroit grand jury. The prosecutor
has rightly stated
that “this brutal practice is conducted on girls for one reason, to
control them as women. FGM will not be tolerated in the United States.”
“Federal Law Doesn’t Require Healthcare Providers to Report FGM Despite Half a Million ‘At Risk’”, by Michael Patrick Leahy, Breitbart, April 27, 2017:
The barbaric practice of female genital mutilation — a
procedure made unlawful by the Illegal Immigrant Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996 — has been thrust to the fore of public
debate in the United States following the arrests of Dr. Jumana
Nagarwala, Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, and Attar’s wife Farida in Michigan
this month.
According to reports, several young Somali girls were brought from
Minnesota, one of twenty-four states that have passed legislation to
make female genital mutilation (FGM) illegal according to state laws, to
Michigan, one of twenty-six states in which FGM has not been made
illegal in state law, where Dr. Nagarwala, with assistance from Mrs.
Attar, performed the procedure outlawed by federal law in a medical
office owned by Dr. Attar.
“Since 1996, there have been specific federal criminal penalties for
performing FGM/C in the United States on anyone under 18 years old,
including fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both. In 2013, Congress
amended the federal statute related to FGM/C to criminalize the knowing
transportation of a girl under 18 years old from the United States for
the purpose of performing FGM/C abroad—often referred to as ‘vacation
cutting,’ ” according to the June 2016 Government Accountability
Office’s report Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.
The current federal statute, which codifies both the 1996 law and the
2013 law can be seen here at U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 7 § 116 –
Female genital mutilation.
Surprisingly, neither the 1996 federal law that outlawed FGM, nor the
2013 federal law that outlawed “vacation cutting” requires health care
providers to report known or suspected instances of FGM to local, state,
or federal health authorities or law enforcement. Current federal law
criminalizes the practice of FGM, but does not specifically require
reporting on it, though health care providers are obligated to report
instances of child abuse, a category in which FGM falls.
With this paucity of reporting data, two recent studies, one by the
Population Reference Bureau (PRB), another by the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), have used demographic analysis to estimate that the
number of women who have “undergone” FGM or are “at risk of the
procedure” in the United States exceeds 500,000.
“Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), involving partial or
total removal of the external genitals of girls and women for religious,
cultural, or other nonmedical reasons, has devastating immediate and
long-term health and social effects, especially related to childbirth,”
the Population Reference Bureau (PRB), a non-profit research organized
funded in part by the Bill & Melissa Gates Foundation, reported in
February 2016.
“In 2013, there were up to 507,000 U.S. women and girls who had
undergone FGM/C or were at risk of the procedure, according to PRB’s
data analysis. This figure is more than twice the number of women and
girls estimated to be at risk in 2000 (228,000). The rapid increase in
women and girls at risk reflects an increase in immigration to the
United States, rather than an increase in the share of women and girls
at risk of being cut. The estimated U.S. population at risk of FGM/C is
calculated by applying country- and age-specific FGM/C prevalence rates
to the number of U.S. women and girls with ties to those countries,” PRB
reported.
PRB’s “at risk” estimates were based on demographic analysis, rather than actual reported incidents of FGM in the United States.
They made the common sense assumption that young girls raised in
immigrant households where the country of origin is one where the FGM
incidence has been documented to be high are “at risk” since those
cultural practices are not left in the home country by the family but
are likely to continue in the United States.
“Just three sending countries—Egypt, Ethiopia, and Somalia—accounted
for 55 percent of all U.S. women and girls at risk in 2013 (see Table
1). These three countries stand out because they have a combination of
high FGM/C prevalence rates and a relatively large number of immigrants
to the United States. The FGM/C prevalence rate for women and girls ages
15 to 49 is 91 percent in Egypt, 74 percent in Ethiopia, and 98 percent
in Somalia. About 97 percent of U.S. women and girls at risk were from
African countries, while just 3 percent were from Asia (Iraq and
Yemen),” PRB explained.
“FGM/C has gained attention in the United States in part because of
the rising number of immigrants from countries where FGM/C is prevalent,
especially sub-Saharan Africa. Between 2000 and 2013, the foreign-born
population from Africa more than doubled, from 881,000 to 1.8 million,”
the PRB report added:
This type of violence against women violates women’s human rights.
There are more than 3 million girls, the majority in sub-Saharan Africa,
who are at risk of cutting/mutilation each year. In Djibouti, Guinea,
and Somalia, nine in 10 girls ages 15 to 19 have been subjected to
FGM/C. Some countries in Africa have recently outlawed the practice,
including Guinea-Bissau, but progress in eliminating the harmful
traditional practice has been slow.1 Although FGM/C is most prevalent in
sub-Saharan Africa, global migration patterns have increased the risk
of FGM/C among women and girls living in developed countries, including
the United States.
“CDC published a report in 2016 estimating that 513,000 women and
girls in the United States were at risk of or may have been subjected to
FGM/C in 2012,” according to the June 2016 Government Accountability
Office’s report Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. The CDC report found
the virtually the same results PRB found using 2013 data:
While subject to certain limitations, this represents a substantial
increase—about threefold—from CDC’s prior estimate of 168,000, which was
based on 1990 data.CDC attributed this increase to a sharp rise in
recent decades in the U.S. population originating from countries where
FGM/C is commonly practiced, and noted that the increase occurred
despite FGM/C prevalence not increasing or seemingly falling in many of
these countries.
“In the report for the 2012 estimate, the authors said that until
scientifically valid data are collected, the approach used provides the
best available information on the potential levels of FGM/C,” GAO wrote:
CDC and others have acknowledged that collecting more scientifically
valid data would be difficult due, in part, to the cultural and legal
sensitivity of the information needed. International efforts to collect
data on the actual occurrence of FGM/C have faced similar challenges.
Starting in October
2015, however, the United Kingdom began requiring health care providers
in England to report through a nationwide database any instance of FGM/C
described to them or discovered during physical exams. (emphasis added)
Recent press reports indicate that the methodologies used in both the
CDC report and the PRB report are supported by at least one instance
where health care providers actually tracked the incidence of FGM among
recent immigrants to the United States from a country in which it is a
very common cultural practice.
“In Phoenix, Arizona, a staggering 98 percent of Somali women being
treated at the Refugee Women’s Health Clinic have been circumcised,
founder Dr. Crista Johnson said. She estimates the Somali community is
at least 12,000-strong,” NBC News reported in 2014.
But the work by the Refugee Women’s Health Clinic in Phoenix
accurately reporting on the incidence of FGM among recent immigrants to
the United States is the exception in a public health system that is not
required to specifically report suspected or actual incidents of FGM by
law in most jurisdictions and is reluctant to do so for a variety of
ideological and institutional reasons.
“Despite the fact that FGM in all forms has been explicitly illegal
in the United States since 1996, legislation criminalizing the practice
has not been comprehensively implemented or enforced, and community
members, social service providers and law enforcement officials often
fail to identify, report or investigate incidents of FGM,” Sanctuary for
Families reported in 2013:
Anecdotal evidence indicates that female genital mutilation also
continues to be performed within the United States. Typically, FGM in
the U.S. is carried out by traditional practitioners who operate
covertly and illegally. When U.S. health care providers carry out the
procedure, they frequently come from countries where the practice is
prevalent, and they operate on girls from their own communities at the
request of a child’s parents.
“Some states have enacted laws specifically criminalizing FGM/C,
while other states may pursue FGM/C offenses under other related
statutes, such as child abuse laws,” according to the June 2016
Government Accountability Office’s report Female Genital
Mutilation/Cutting:
In some instances, states require that an occurrence of FGM/C be reported.
DOJ indicates that two states, Illinois and Tennessee, have mandatory reporting for FGM/C.
All states have mandatory reporting laws governing child abuse, which
may apply to reporting FGM/C depending on the relevant circumstances
and particular statutory requirements.
Some state laws address other areas of FGM/C, such as provisions
prohibiting “vacation cutting” or provisions for community education and
outreach.
“Local law enforcement and child protection officials told us that
immigrant communities may underreport due to cultural norms, victims’
reluctance to betray their community or family members, and concern
about potential effects on their immigration status and that of their
family members. In addition, although many professionals who may be in
contact with girls at risk for FGM/C are mandatory reporters (e.g.,
health care, school, and child care officials), they may be uncertain
about whether FGM/C should be reported,” according to the Government
Accountability Office’s June 2016 report Female Genital
Mutilation/Cutting:
For example, health care providers we spoke with stated that they may
not report instances of girls being at risk of or subjected to FGM/C
due to uncertainty about mandatory reporting requirements (e.g., if
FGM/C occurred before arriving in the United States), or because they
prefer to counsel parents on the consequences of FGM/C to change
parents’ position on the issue.
School officials we spoke with had little or no experience
encountering FGM/C among their students, in general, and school
officials may not be certain of what actions are appropriate when they
encounter suspicions of FGM/C, which can affect reporting. For example,
an official from a nongovernmental organization that works with Somali
women said teachers contacted them for guidance on dealing with
suspicions of vacation cutting.
In addition, a former school psychologist who now works with a
national organization told us about an instance when school officials
had suspicions of vacation cutting that was not
reported.
However, they did not confirm these suspicions with the student or
her family, out of concern that she would be pulled out of school and
her home environment would be disrupted. Without clear evidence that
FGM/C had occurred, the officials decided to provide the student with
general support for trauma.
States’ mandatory reporting requirements vary across jurisdictions,
are dependent on the relevant facts and circumstances, and would be
subject to some level of interpretation by
the reporting official. These factors can make it challenging to
determine the appropriate course of action when encountering potential
instances or risks of FGM/C on minors
The public health establishment–at the federal, state, and county
levels–has been reluctant to look for and report on female genital
mutilation (FGM) data, just as it has been reluctant to report on the
incidence of latent and active tuberculosis (TB) among resettled
refugees.
An example of this reluctance when it comes to reporting on active TB
among refugees is the hidden blockbuster discovered by Breitbart News
in January that 1,565 refugees have been “diagnosed with active TB since
2012, three times more than previously reported.”
Many state government health departments that report active TB among refugees make the data very difficult to find.
Other state government health departments simply fail to fully report
active TB among refugees, and many county governments, particularly
those in urban areas controlled by Democrats, refuse to comply with the
public health reporting requirements of the Refugee Act of 1980,
particularly with regards to latent TB.
Public data on the incidence of FGM–which occurs almost exclusively
among the immigrant population arriving from Africa, the Middle East,
and the Near East–is far more difficult to obtain than public data on
the incidence of active TB.
Every state has had very clear reporting standards about the
incidence of active TB among the entire population for well over half a
century–in many states for more than a century.
Such is not the case with FGM, because the barbaric practice was
virtually unknown in the United States until the significant upswing
over the past several decades in the arrival of immigrants from
countries where it is has been a common practice for centuries.
“I think it’s more than mere reluctance,” an attorney familiar with
the refugee resettlement program tells Breitbart News about the
reluctance of public health officials to obtain and report data on FGM.
“I think it’s a deliberate, ideological approach of moral
equivalency, meaning that just about anything multiculturalism dishes
out, should be respected and accepted – and the PC bureaucracy backs
them up,” the attorney says.
“Public health and medical care in general, is not supposed to be a
judgment, and because FGM has been made illegal in the U.S. with
individual states even passing their own laws, it’s made it easier for
public health departments to opt out of addressing it, leaving it
instead to law enforcement agencies,” the attorney adds.
“If there is any doubt, just look at the annual refugee health
reports like the one for Texas that has extensive data about health
issues related to arriving refugees; they report on STDS but there is
nothing about FGM, a condition that for many women who have been
mutilated, brings life-long medical issues,” the attorney concludes.
The 2014 Refugee Health Report issued by the state of Texas, for
instance reports, extensively on the rates of syphilis for refugees over
the age of 15, but includes no data on FGM.
Refugee health reports for the states of California, Utah, Arizona, Minnesota, Indiana, and Florida follow a similar pattern.
The Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) guidelines to medical
professionals responsible for conducting the initial domestic medical
screenings of refugees arriving in the United States for resettlement by
the federal government specifically recommend genital examinations,
which would clearly identify arriving refugees who are FGM victims.
However, a significant number of those screeners may not be following
those recommendations, or may delay the examinations indefinitely based
on language in the guidelines that states “[i]n refugees who previously
experienced trauma (e.g., sexual assault victims), the anal and genital
examination may be postponed until the refugee establishes a trusting
relationship with a provider.”
That apparent failure misses key information that could help stop the
spread of the barbaric practice in the United States, as adult women
arriving in the country who are already victims of FGM are likely to be
in family situations where their daughters are at risk of being
subjected to the same abuse in this country.
Common sense suggests that the PRB’s and CDC’s estimates of the
number of girls in the United States at risk for FGM is likely to be
very close to the true incidence of FGM in this country today.
The public health establishment’s long record of hiding and obscuring data…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Catholics take note: his favorite religion isn’t yours. My latest in FrontPage:
Reuters
reported Tuesday that “Pope Francis hopes to mend ties with Muslims on
his trip to Egypt on Friday but faces criticism from church
conservatives for meeting Islamic religious leaders after a spate of
deadly attacks against Christians.”
He has to mend ties? After Palm Sunday jihad massacres at two
churches in Egypt, shouldn’t it be Egyptian Muslims who are reaching out
to him to mend ties?
“A main reason for the trip,” Reuters explains, “is to try to
strengthen relations with the 1,000-year-old Azhar center that were cut
by the Muslim side in 2011 over what it said were repeated insults of
Islam by Francis’s predecessor, Pope Benedict.”
What did Benedict say? Andrea Gagliarducci of the Catholic News Agency
explains that after a jihad terrorist murdered 23 Christians in a
church in Alexandria 2011, Benedict decried “terrorism” and the
“strategy of violence” against Christians, and called for the Christians
of the Middle East to be protected.
Al-Azhar’s Grand Imam, Ahmed al-Tayeb, whom Pope Francis welcomed to
the Vatican in May 2016, was furious. He railed at Benedict for his
“interference” in Egypt’s affairs and warned of a “negative political
reaction” to the Pope’s remarks. In a statement, Al-Azhar denounced
the Pope’s “repeated negative references to Islam and his claims that
Muslims persecute those living among them in the Middle East.”
Benedict stood his ground, and that was that. But in September 2013, al-Azhar announced
that Pope Francis had sent a personal message to al-Tayeb. In it,
according to al-Azhar, Francis declared his respect for Islam and his
desire to achieve “mutual understanding between the world’s Christians
and Muslims in order to build peace and justice.” At the same time, Al
Tayyeb met with the Apostolic Nuncio to Egypt, Mgr. Jean-Paul Gobel, and
told him in no uncertain terms that speaking about Islam in a negative
manner was a “red line” that must not be crossed.
So Pope Benedict condemned a jihad attack, one that al-Azhar also condemned, and yet al-Azhar suspended dialogue because of the Pope’s condemnation.
Then Pope Francis wrote to the Grand Imam of al-Azhar affirming his
respect for Islam, and the Grand Imam warned him that criticizing Islam
was a “red line” that he must not cross. And he hasn’t, and won’t. But
all those who think that it’s marvelous that the Pope is “respectful”
and refuses to “poke them in the eye” should remember: Benedict’s
supposed insults to Islam were denunciations of jihad attacks on
Christians. Pope Francis won’t be so indelicate. In contrast to
Benedict, Francis energetically defends Islam, and leaves the persecuted
Christians twisting in the wind, so he is acceptable to al-Azhar.
The worst part about this is the fact that because this man is Pope,
all too many Catholics, including some in positions of high authority,
treat him as if he were a divine oracle, his every utterance to be
revered, respected, studied, and followed. Because of the statement of
the Second Vatican Council that “religious submission of mind and will
must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman
Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra,” and “must
be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with
reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to,
according to his manifest mind and will,” Catholic leaders and
publications tend to think that they must adhere to anything the Pope says about anything.
This leads them into impossible positions. When Pope Benedict XVI
appeared to criticize the aspects of Islam that incite and justify
violence, they allowed for criticism of Islam. When Francis showed
himself to be an Islamic apologist, they became Islamic apologists. All
too many Catholic leaders and institutions, in other words, are more
interested in being papists than in being truthful. They would rather
show loyalty to the Pope, no matter how damaging his utterances, than
stand for the truth on the own against the Pope.
The contradiction is clear, and absolute. If the Catholic Church has
become one of Islam’s loudest boosters, then those who are aware of the
nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, rooted in Islamic texts and
teachings, have to make some decisions about where they stand.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
It’s hard to be Egyptian: water turning to blood, frogs, lice, wild
animals, diseased livestock, boils, hailstorms, locusts, darkness, death
of firstborn, and now Pope Francis.
Seriously, Francis notes the “incompatibility of violence and faith”
and says: “Let us say once more a firm and clear ‘No!’ to every form of
violence, vengeance and hatred carried out in the name of religion or in
the name of God.”
This all sounds good, but this is the man who said that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”
It is clear that he has not revised that catastrophically
counterfactual view, for instead of moving from his statement about
rejecting violence in the name of religion to call upon Al-Azhar to
reform the teachings of Islam that call for violence against
unbelievers, Francis went on to an appeal for arms control and an
oblique denunciation of Donald Trump and European leaders who want to
stem the Muslim migrant onslaught: “Francis called for an end to the
‘proliferation of arms’ and lambasted ‘demagogic forms of populism.” On
guns he said: “If they are produced and sold, sooner or later they will
be used. Only by bringing into the light of day the murky maneuverings
that feed the cancer of war can its real causes be prevented. National
leaders, institutions and the media are obliged to undertake this urgent
and grave task.” As if taking away weapons would end the jihad, which
is what someone who believes that the Qur’an is opposed to any form of
violence would think.
In greeting Al-Azhar’s sinister
Ahmed al-Tayeb, Francis was once again photographed grinning happily
while Tayeb stares back coldly. Every photo of them captures the same
expressions, and they are a parable for the “interfaith dialogue” scam
and for the Western leaders’ attitude as compared with that of the
leaders of Muslim countries: the naive and ignorant Westerner reaching
out in unfeigned friendship, happy to prove himself “tolerant” and not
“Islamophobic,” while his Muslim counterpart, far more aware of what is
going on, reacts coolly, and does not reveal what he is thinking.
But those who are aware of the contempt for Christians that is in the
Qur’an and Sunnah, and the nature and magnitude of the global jihad,
will have a pretty good idea of what is going through al-Tayeb’s mind.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)
“Pope Francis in Egypt: ‘No to every form of violence,'” by Sarah Sirgany and Joe Sterling, CNN, April 28, 2017:
Cairo (CNN)Pope Francis, speaking at the heart of Sunni
Islam scholarship, stressed the importance of unity between Muslims and
Christians to shape world peace and emphasized the “incompatibility of
violence and faith.”
“Let us say once more a firm and clear ‘No!’ to every form of
violence, vengeance and hatred carried out in the name of religion or in
the name of God,” the Pope said in Italian in a speech at a peace
conference at Al-Azhar University, the premier seat of high learning
among Sunni Muslims.
The Pope arrived in Egypt on Friday, kicking off a two-day trip
designed to forge Muslim-Christian brotherhood and show solidarity with
the country’s persecuted Coptic Christian minority.
Francis met with Sheikh Ahmed el-Tayeb and became the first pontiff to visit the institution since Pope John Paul II in 2000.
The Pope and the Grand Imam spoke at the closing of the International
Conference for Peace, organized by Al-Azhar. When he greeted the Grand
Imam, the Pope called him “my brother.” The men sat side by side at the
conference….
Francis opened his speech with “As-Salaam Alaikum,” the traditional
Muslim greeting in Arabic that means “Peace be upon you,” after the
imam’s address.”In order to prevent conflicts and build peace, it is
essential that we spare no effort in eliminating situations of poverty
and exploitation where extremism more easily takes root, and in blocking
the flow of money and weapons destined to those who provoke violence,”
he said.
Francis called for an end to the “proliferation of arms” and lambasted “demagogic forms of populism.”
“If they are produced and sold, sooner or later they will be used,”
he said. “Only by bringing into the light of day the murky maneuverings
that feed the cancer of war can its real causes be prevented. National
leaders, institutions and the media are obliged to undertake this urgent
and grave task.”…
The Pope, again speaking in Italian, focused on Egypt’s role in
fighting terrorism in the region, evoking incidents from its biblical
and modern history. He ceremonially greeted all Egyptian people,
including minority Christians — Coptic Orthodox, Greek Byzantines,
Armenian Orthodox, Protestants and Catholics.”Your presence in this,
your country, is not new or accidental, but ancient and an inseparable
part of the history of Egypt,” he said. “You are an integral part of
this country, and over the course of the centuries you have developed a
sort of unique rapport, a particular symbiosis, which can serve as an
example to other nations.”
Francis highlighted the sacrifice of members of the army and the
police, the forced exodus of Christians from Sinai and the latest church
bombings. He also stressed respect for human rights and religious
freedoms….
Pope Tawadros II, head of Egypt’s Coptic Orthodox Church, then
greeted Francis at St. Mark’s Coptic Orthodox Cathedral in Cairo’s
Abbassiya district, state TV said. They walked together in procession
and took part in ecumenical prayers at the adjacent church of St. Peter,
the site of a deadly blast in December that left at least 23 people
dead….
"SCIENCE GUY" BILL NYE'S "SEX JUNK" RAP VIDEO WITH RACHEL BLOOM DISPLAYS TRANSGENDERISM
TO CHILDREN IN SONG & DANCE
UPDATED APRIL 29, 2017:
Bill Nye's "Sex Junk" Rap Video-The Most Cringy in Human History
Published on Apr 24, 2017
Bill
Nye the Science Guy's new Netflix show "Bill Nye Saves the World"
produced the most awful music performance in the history of the human
race. Rachel Bloom from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend is the rapper, and it's
about gender identity.
This Video Will End Bill Nye's Career - My Sex Junk - Rachel Bloom - Bill Nye Saves The World
Bill Nye The Cisgender Guy and the Ridiculous Netflix Gender Rap Song From Rachel Bloom (REACTION)
Published on Apr 25, 2017
Bill
Nye the “Science Guy” has a new show on Netflix called “Bill Nye Saves
The World” and at least one of the segments is not going over very well
with the internets. A person posted the video on YouTube and the
dislike to like ratio is somewhere around 90% or higher. The segment in
question features Rachel Bloom of the television show “My Crazy Ex
Girlfriend.” She broke out into a rap song about gender and how it’s on
a spectrum. She also talked about the various forms of homosexual sex
referring to it as “butt stuff.” A really bizarre performance which was
made even more bizarre by former 90’s nerd icon Bill Nye dancing in the
background like a hip hop hype man.
As with many other former
Hollywood stars, Bill Nye appears to be a desperate man. He was made a
household name for his 1990’s science experiment show … but what does a
man with only a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering do after his
show as a television scientist concludes? He may be too famous for
mundane 9-5 type of work … and not skilled enough to become an Elon Musk
type of person. So what to do? Remain in the public sphere and try to
make money just like all other Hollywood actors attempt to do so they
can prevent from being a fixture on the world famous Skid Row in Los
Angeles.
So his solution to his apparent career issues appears
to have made him become a shill for corporate / political interests in
Washington D.C. What other reason is there to go back on what you said
in your aforementioned TV show as far as gender being determined by your
chromosomes to now say that it is fluid? This is on top of him being
second to only Algore himself when it comes to marketing the false
religion of climate change. Bill Nye, once a respected man, is now a
shell of his former self with a Netflix Show which does nothing but
promote the viewpoint of a social justice warrior disguised as
“science.”
EUGENICIST BILL NYE: SCIENCE GUY TRASHES LARGE FAMILIES; AS WELL AS RELIGION, AND PRO LIFERS
ANY
REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BILL NYE, BILL GATES, HILLARY CLINTON &
MARGARET SANGER, FOUNDER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ON EUGENICS?
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Bill Nye Trashes People With Large Families, Wants Them Penalized for Having “Extra Kids” NATIONAL MICAIAH BILGER APR 26, 2017 | 12:19PM WASHINGTON, DC Bill Nye “the Science Guy,” famous for hosting a children’s
educational TV show, is not as kid-friendly as he initially may appear. An abortion advocate, Nye recently hosted a new Netflix show that The Federalist describes as bordering on eugenics. The episode “Earth’s People Problem” is part of the Netflix series
“Bill Nye Saves the World.” In the half-hour show, Nye and several
panelists discuss how they think large families and population growth
are affecting the world, according to the report. One of those panelists is an abortionist named Nerys Benfield who
practices at the Montefiore Medical Center in New York City. Another is
Dr. Rachel Snow of the United Nations Population Fund, which has been linked to coercive abortion practices in China.
Nye begins the show by describing how humans use natural resources. According to the report:
Following an intro that demonstrates how human consumption is like
sponges soaking up water, Nye explains how women who have access to
educational and professional opportunities tend to have fewer children.
This is true …
Nye says when women are in power, they have fewer children, and more
resources can be devoted to those children. “It’s not rocket surgery.
It’s science!” he coyly explains.
The underlying eugenic and abortion tones come out later in the show.
Though the word “abortion” never is mentioned, panelists hint at it
while talking about family planning and women’s health care. At one point, Nye even asks the panel if families should be penalized for having “extra kids.”
The report continues:
The fight against climate change, Nye’s most passionate cause, is
brought up by [Dr. Travis Rieder, ethicist at the Berman Institute at
Johns Hopkins University], who notes that children in developed
countries use 160 times more resources than children in the developing
world. This is where the creepy totalitarianism of the environmental
movement starts to show itself. Nye asks, bluntly, “Should we have
policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed
world?” …
Rieder says we should “at least consider” a form of punishment for
people who have these Extra Kids (TM). Nye impatiently responds that
“consider means do it.” Snow, to her credit, jumps in and takes issue
with the idea that “we do anything to incentivize fewer children or more
children.” Benfield notes the history of compulsory sterilization in
America, a practice that was in place as recently as the 1970s. The
issue was not come at from a position of justice in the past, she adds.
But this time will be different, I guess? Some countries already do penalize large families, and their
population policies are notoriously abusive. China mandates that
families have only two children. Until last year, most families in China
were allowed one child. Families who have more than one or two children
report being coerced or even forced to abort their unborn children, fired from their jobs and penalized with huge fines. Last October, the BBC interviewed a Chinese family who went into hiding after conceiving a third child.
“The local government carries out pregnancy examinations every three
months,” the husband told the BBC. “If we weren’t in hiding, they would
have forced us to have an abortion.”
Others have been even less fortunate. A U.S. Congressional report from 2011 detailed
one horrifying case where a woman 9-months pregnant with twins was
dragged to a local medical center, held down and forced to abort her
unborn twins.
These coercive population policies have proven to be abusive, and yet they are being promoted again in popular western media.
_____________________________________________________
Bill Nye The Eugenics Guy
Published on May 2, 2017
Despite
the fact that Bill Nye isn't a scientist, (he only plays one on TV,
kids) he's more than happy to come out and advocate for imprisoning
those who don't share his "scientific" beliefs and talk positively about
eugenics.
Del Bigtree vs Bill Nye on Vaccines
Here’s how vaccines work. We study a germ. We call this particular one: Gary.
[growling noises] Believe it or not, that is absolutely how they teach
the class on vaccinations in every medical school across the country.
Basically, we take a disease. We modify it, and we put it in some inert
substance, and inject into you and your body recognizes it over and over
again and fights it. But Bill Nye has completely and totally
oversimplified this to make you think it’s a good idea. Here’s the part
of this little 1st grader’s textbook example you didn’t cover, Bill.
First of all: aluminum. What happens when you inject it when you’re a
baby? Has there every been a safety test on it? Never. Not in the
history of man have we ever said “What is it that happens when we inject
aluminum?” We don’t care, Bill. Gary gets a little shot of aluminum in
there. So we’re going to take mercury… we’re putting it inside of Gary
here. Most toxic substance, by the way, that’s not radioactive.
VIDEO:
New Low, Bill Nye: Science Is Not Real, Claims Chromosomes Do Not Pick Gender
