DAVID HOROWITZ: SORRY FOR BLURTING IT OUT, BUT CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD IS A LIAR~MALKIN: "SINCERE" CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD OR SINCERE BULLCRAP?

SORRY FOR BLURTING IT OUT, BUT 

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD IS A LIAR

BY DAVID HOROWITZ

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271471/sorry-blurting-it-out-christine-blasey-ford-liar-david-horowitz; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

One thing I learned watching the witch trial of Brett Kavanaugh on MSNBC, is that a prestigious university in New York has a Vice President for Social Justice. (She is an MSNBC commentator). Her Orwellian title is but one of many signs that our country is already on the threshold of 1984; the Judiciary Committee circus is another.

In her comments on the hearings, the Vice President for Social Justice, Maya Wiley, was clearly out for blood, and had no interest in evidence, due process, or the facts. She is also of course both a woman, a woman “of color” and a lesbian. In other words, she occupies three of the top rungs in the hierarchy of the oppressed - all bombs waiting to blow up in the face of any straight white male who stumbles into their cross-hairs.

Any fair-minded observer of the Kavanaugh proceedings would have noted that no one – Republican or Democrat - so much as laid a glove on his female accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, even though she had come forward to destroy the life of an exemplary individual and his family. No one, dared to do so. Call this feminine or victim privilege. Kavanaugh’s high school yearbooks with tales of drinking were fair game, but Ford’s – which openly talk of the girls’ sexual promiscuity and boast of girls passing out at drinking parties - were not. Nor were her extensive political connections to the anti-Trump left, the pro-abortion movement, the Democratic Party and even the law firm involved in the Steele dossier.

Yes, the sexual crime prosecutor established that Ford lied to the committee when she said she couldn’t come to Washington for the hearings because she was afraid of flying. In fact, as she admitted under questioning, she has frequently flown all over the world for pleasure. But no one actually confronted her about this. For example, no one asked her directly, “If you were brazen enough to lie to a congressional committee about this, why should we believe you in regard to anything else?"

Yes the same prosecutor gently asked Ford why she thought her best friend Leland Keyser, whom she claimed was present at the party and would corroborate her story, in fact refuted it, saying that she was never at such a party, and the one in question never happened. Ford gave a transparently evasive answer saying her friend had (unspecified) health issues, while never explaining what they were or why that should cause her to contradict what Ford had claimed.

Actually, all the alleged witnesses to the party where the incident was supposed to have taken place have denied that they were there. The one witness who was allegedly in the room where she claimed the incident took place says he wasn’t there. But none of the senators had the temerity to confront her directly with the obvious question: why should we believe your inflammatory claims about Judge Kavanaugh given that no one you have named supports any piece of your story? Moreover, no one asked her “How do you feel about besmirching the reputation of a stellar individual, and bringing incalculable pain to his family by advancing claims that no one corroborates? How can you say that you are 100% sure an incident happened, when you can’t remember anything else accurately about the evening? Did your lawyers instruct you to say 100%? What actually did your lawyers prompt you to say in your prepared statement?

No one said to her: you signed a letter attacking President Trump’s border policies and were able to get the anti-Trump ACLU to publish it; you contacted an anti-Trump paper, the Washington Post, to make your charges; you turned first to Democrats who are sworn to “resist” – actually sabotage –the Trump presidency and his judicial nominees; and you accepted attorneys recommended by Democrats, who are activist Democrat, anti-Trump lawyers. Can we conclude, therefore, that there might be a political motive behind your decision to bring up these character-ruining accusations about a rough-housing you allegedly received 37 years ago when you and Kavanaugh were too young to even vote?

No one dared to ask these questions or to vigorously pursue problematic areas of her testimony and behavior. Instead everyone expressed sympathy for her and her pain in testifying, and said how credible she sounded – even though, unlike Kavanaugh’s presentation, hers was vetted and coached by lawyers, and even though it amounted to character assassination if her memory was false.

At the bottom of these asymmetries lies the fact that despite half a century of women’s “liberation” and “hear me roar” proclamations the feminist attitude towards women is still Victorian. Women are fragile violets who wilt before the raised voices and impassioned claims of male innocence. But this image is a one way mirror. Let a moment go by and then, when they or their defenders are on the counter-attack, hear them roar. Senator Mazie Hirono put it mind-numbingly well: “Men should just shut up and stand up (for their female accusers of course).”

This is the ideologically constructed atmosphere, which makes a latter-day witch trial like the Judiciary hearings possible. Christine Blasey Ford’s story is unbelievable on its face. She claims that after the alleged incident at the alleged party, where three of her friends (who have denied it) were allegedly present, she fled. Here are some questions that were not asked:

How did she get past those friends without them seeing her and her distress?

How could she not have warned her best friend, Leland Keyser, that there were two potential rapists in the house, if that’s what she thought?

How did she get home?

How did her best friend not ask her the next day why she left without her, or what happened?

Why was this such a trauma she could not tell her best friend? One can understand why she would want to conceal from her parents that she had gone to a drinking party with boys, but her friend who was allegedly there? She doesn’t even claim that she was raped, only that she was frightened in an incident that could have happened at any of the drunken parties she might have attended as described in her high school yearbook.

On the face of it, Christine Blasey Ford’s story is not only unsubstantiated. It isn’t credible. The destruction of Brett Kavanaugh’s reputation is the equivalent of a modern-day lynching – the third that Democrats have orchestrated in the last twenty-seven years. It’s despicable. At least Republicans like Lindsey Graham have laid that charge at the door of the Democratic culprits who worked so hard to accomplish it. But, as a nation, we have obviously not reached the point where we can grant women true equality by confronting their lies and their reckless accusations with the same candor and frankness we would if they were coming out of the mouths of men.    

_______________________________________________________________

MICHELLE MALKIN: "SINCERE" CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD OR SINCERE BULLCRAP? 

PRESIDENT TRUMP HOSTS "MAGA" RALLY IN SOUTHAVEN, MISSISSIPPI

PRESIDENT TRUMP HOSTS "MAGA" RALLY 

IN SOUTHAVEN, MISSISSIPPI 

President Trump stops in Southaven, MS, on his 'Make America Great Again' campaign tour. Trump comes to Mississippi to drum up support for Republican Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith's 2018 reelection bid.

LEFTISTS ATTACK KAVANAUGH'S KIDS; SUGGEST HE MIGHT MOLEST LITTLE GIRLS

Cartoons Above From:

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/liberal-political-cartoonists-continue-smear-kavanaugh

LEFTISTS ATTACK KAVANAUGH'S KIDS; SUGGEST HE MIGHT MOLEST LITTLE GIRLS 

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/30218-leftists-attack-kavanaugh-kids-suggest-he-might-molest-little-girls?vsmaid=1304&vcid=3987; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Media leftists have poured out their vitriol against U.S. Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh, leveling the charge that he might well be a child molester, and attacking his children in a cartoon.

With the campaign to paint him as mad gang rapist and teenage criminal genius losing steam, the Left needed a new tactic: depict Kavanaugh as a raging college drunk and ill-tempered goon.

In other words, he’s a dangerous man without the necessary “judicial temperament” to sit on the Supreme Court.

Cartoons
The cartoons came from a leftist named Chris Britt, who draws for Creators.com. He published two particularly vile pieces, one featuring Kavanaugh’s daughters, the other featuring the judge’s calendars.

The first features a little girl kneeling at her bed saying her nighttime prayers. “Kavanaugh’s Daughter Says Another Prayer,” it explains. Then comes what Britt thought was a funny punchline: “Dear God, forgive my angry, alcoholic father for sexually assaulting Dr. Ford.”

The drawing is a direct strike at Kavanaugh’s 10-year-old daughter. On Thursday, during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing where Christine Blasey Ford leveled her unsubstantiated and suspiciously foggy attempted rape charge, Kavanaugh told the worthies of the Senate that his daughter said the Kavanaughs should pray for Dr. Ford.

“I intend no ill will to Dr. Ford and her family,” Kavanaugh said. “The other night, Ashley and my daughter, Liza, said their prayers. And little Liza — all of 10 years old — said to Ashley, ‘We should pray for the woman.’ It’s a lot of wisdom from a 10-year old. We mean — we mean no ill will.”

Apparently, that is not the case with cartoonist Britt.

Before that, Britt delivered a cartoon ridiculing Kavanaugh’s high-school calendar that all but proved he couldn’t have done what Ford accused him of doing.

Britt turned that evidence into a salacious put down: “Read Bible then drank 25 beers! Stud!!” the first entry said. “Dropped my pants at school to show some chicks my ... you know what!” another said. A third: “Held some stupid girl down and groped her!!! Covered her mouth with my hand!!!”

Another for the heart of why the Left opposes Kavanaugh: “Read Bible again! Dreamed of being on the Supreme Court! Overturn Roe v. Wade! Beer!!!!!”

The worst two, however were these: “Watched gang rape!” and then “Watched another gang rape!”

Claim: Kavanaugh Would Molest Girls
Radical leftists even turned Kavanaugh’s love of coaching girls’ basketball against him.

Kavanaugh had testified that he coaches “because I know that a girl’s confidence on the basketball court translates into confidence in other aspects of life. I love coaching more than anything I’ve ever done in my whole life. But thanks to what some of you on this side of the committee have unleashed, I may never be able to coach again.”

And that is exactly what at least one sports columnist had suggested, turning a point of pride with Kavanaugh against him. To its credit, USA Today retracted this awful implication.

“Brett Kavanaugh testified the other day that he might never coach girls’ basketball again,” Erik Brady wrote. “He shouldn’t — at least not until further investigation has concluded. The U.S. Senate may yet confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, but he should stay off basketball courts for now when kids are around.”

In other words, even if Kavanaugh is confirmed, basketball coaching is out because of a scurrilous attempted rape charge. This is the magisterial opinion of a man whose greatest accomplishment is warming a seat in a sports arena.

Anyway, the leftist commentariat piled on. Frank Rich, a former theater critic for the New York Times, who often writes about things he knows nothing about, tweeted this opinion: “Kavanaugh’s bragging about coaching girls’ basketball is troubling in retrospect.”

Molly Ball, a writer for Time magazine, unbosomed herself of this one: “Ford’s charge shattered Kavanaugh’s carefully crafted tableau, calling into doubt the image he projected. The row of young girls, legs bare in their private-school skirts, looked different now.”

No Evidence
The problem for all these individuals is this: The prosecutor who examined Ford on Thursday said her own witnesses “refuted” and “failed to corroborate” her claims, which were riddled with lapses in memory.

Ford also lied about being afraid to fly, and has collected almost $750,000 through Go Fund Me.

Julie Swetnick, who claims Kavanaugh is a gang rapist, has been thoroughly discredited.

SWETNICK: I DIDN'T SEE KAVANAUGH SPIKE PUNCH; EX BOYFRIEND: "I DON'T BELIEVE HER"

SWETNICK: 

I DIDN'T SEE KAVANAUGH SPIKE PUNCH; 

EX BOYFRIEND: "I DON'T BELIEVE HER"

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30219-swetnick-i-didn-t-see-kavanaugh-spike-punch-boyfriend-i-don-t-believe-her?vsmaid=1304&vcid=3987;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The credibility of Julie Swetnick, the woman who accuses embattled U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of gang rape, has taken two more hits.

Swetnick, whose attorney is porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, has altered her claims about what she saw at gang-rape parties that she claims Kavanaugh and his friends organized.

And now, her ex-boyfriend has explained in detail that Swetnick might be a tad unstable: She threatened to kill his unborn child, he says.

As The New American has reported in the last week, Swetnick, who has a pile of tax troubles and suspect lawsuits in her past, is not the credible witness that Avenatti claimed. 

Now She’s Not So Sure
Swetnick signed a declaration that contained some fantastic claims about Kavanaugh.

“I attended well over ten house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the years 1981-1983 where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present,” she wrote. “These parties were a common occurrence in the area and occurred nearly every weekend during the school year.”

Swetnick continued:

I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be “gang raped” in a side room or bedroom by a “train” of numerous boys.... 11 boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.

But Swetnick admitted to NBC’s Kate Snow that she saw something else entirely. Asked whether she saw Kavanaugh spike the punch, Swetnick reversed her sworn statement. The footage aired last night.

“I saw him giving red solo cups to quite a few girls during that time frame, and there was grain punch at those parties. And I would not take one of those glasses from Brett Kavanaugh. I saw him around the punch — I won’t say bowls, the punch containers. I don’t know what he did, but I saw him by them.”

So Swetnick did not, as she claimed in her sworn statement, see Kavanaugh try to incapacitate a girl. She assumed it.

As for “boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room,” that didn’t happen, either.

“I would see boys standing outside rooms, congregated together, sort of like a gauntlet,” she told Snow. “And I didn’t know what was occurring. But I would see them laughing, a lot of laughing.”

“Standing in line outside a room?” asked Snow

“Not ‘line,’ but definitely huddled by doors.”

Swetnick then repeated the accusation that Judge and Kavanaugh are likely gang rapists because she saw them standing outside doors, too. “It’s just too coincidental.”

Swetnick did not allege that Kavanaugh participated with the boys she claims raped her, adding that “I cannot specifically say that he was one of the ones who assaulted me.”

But “they were hanging about the area where I started to feel disoriented ... and laughing. I could hear them laughing and laughing.”

Swetnick claims to have told the police and her mother about her own gang rape. NBC has not verified that she told police.

Upshot: Swetnick did not see Kavanaugh spike the punch or drug a girl, did not see lines outside doors, did not see Kavanaugh gang rape a girl and does not say Kavanaugh joined in her gang rape.

Vinneccy: Swetnick Exaggerated Everything
Meanwhile, an old flame explained that Swetnick’s elevator might be stuck on the ground floor, calling his talking about the woman his “civic duty.”

“Right after I broke up with her, she basically called me many times and at one point she basically said, ‘You will never, ever see your unborn child alive,’” Richard Vinneccy told Fox talker Laura Ingraham.

She threatened to kill Vinneccy and his family as well, Vinneccy told Ingraham: “I’m just going to go over there and kill you guys,” Swetnick said.

Vinneccy, who dated Swetnick from 1994 to 2001, told Ingraham that Swetnick’s tale of drug- and alcohol-fueled rape dens was a new one on him:

“Never, never once [did] she mention that to me,” he said. “We used to talk about everything. She never once mentioned that at all.... If you ask me personally if I believe her, I don’t believe her. I really don’t believe her. Nobody knows Julie Swetnick better than me.”

Added Vinneccy: “She always wanted to be the center of attention.... She was exaggerating everything. Everything that came out of her mouth was just exaggerations.”

INFOWARS FILES EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AGAINST PAYPAL IN FEDERAL COURT

INFOWARS FILES EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AGAINST PAYPAL IN FEDERAL COURT

Silicon Valley, the Democratic Party and other large corporations are working in tandem to drive conservatives from the marketplace in what amounts to a dangerous form of political persecution

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/infowars-files-emergency-injunction-against-paypal-in-federal-court/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

To highlight the politically-driven removal of conservatives and libertarians from the marketplace, Infowars has filed a emergency injunction against PayPal in federal court.

“PayPal banning Plaintiff is a bridge too far and, if allowed, sets a dangerous precedent for any person or entity with controversial views,” reads the complaint. “Acceptable use policies of tech companies, including PayPal’s policy, are notoriously broad and subjective, meaning that essentially any expression aside from the most boring and banal interpretation of events potentially violates them.”

“Meanwhile, subject-to-change whims of would-be-censors change from day to day, time to time, and no user of this ubiquitous banking service can predict who will be next.”

You can read more of the complaint below:

______________________________________________

Alex Jones and Erasing Internet History

GLAZOV MOMENT: WHY JIHAD TARGETS CHILDREN & THE INNOCENT~REVIEW OF CAR DRIVING INTO 100 CHILDREN IN SWEDEN

GLAZOV MOMENT: WHY JIHAD TARGETS CHILDREN & THE INNOCENT~REVIEW OF CAR DRIVING INTO 100 CHILDREN IN SWEDEN 

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/glazov-moment-why-jihad-targets-children-and-the-innocent; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, Jamie focuses on Why Jihad Targets Children and the Innocent, and he asks: Why did a car plow into a crowd of 100 children and teachers in Sweden?

Don’t miss it!

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.

Please donate through our new Unified-4-People Campaign or via our Pay Pal account.

And pre-order Jamie’s new book, Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us. Thank you!

FIRED BY THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT FOR CRITICIZING ISLAM-VIDEO INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT SPENCER & CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

FIRED BY THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT FOR CRITICIZING ISLAM-VIDEO INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT SPENCER & CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS 

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/video-fired-by-the-canadian-government-for-criticizing-islam-christine-douglass-williams-with-robert-spencer; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Yesterday CSP studios broadcast a Facebook LiveStream to launch a new book by Christine Douglass-Williams: Fired by the Canadian Government for Criticizing Islam: Multicultural Canada: A Weak Link In the Battle Against Islamization. The panel included the author: Christine Douglass-Williams, Public Affairs and Media Consultant to the International Christian Embassy in Jerusalem, former federally appointed Director with the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and past advisor to the former Office of Religious Freedom in Canada As well as: Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy.

Order Fired by the Canadian Government for Criticizing Islam here.

Order The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS by Robert Spencer here.

UK: STEPFATHER CALLED "RACIST" FOR COMPLAINING ABOUT STEPDAUGHTER'S ASSIGNMENT TO WRITE ABOUT CONVERTING TO ISLAM

UK: STEPFATHER CALLED "RACIST" 

FOR COMPLAINING ABOUT STEPDAUGHTER'S ASSIGNMENT TO WRITE ABOUT 

CONVERTING TO ISLAM 

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/uk-stepfather-called-racist-for-complaining-about-stepdaughters-assignment-to-write-about-converting-to-islam; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Would any British school have given an assignment to write about converting to Christianity? Of course not. If it had done so, Muslim students, their parents, and Islamic groups would be protesting vociferously, and the school would be apologizing. But in this case, it is the stepfather who is vilified for complaining. And so the Islamization of Britain gallops forward.

“‘I’ve been called a racist and a bigot’: Stepfather explains why he complained when school asked his girl, 12, to write a letter for homework about becoming a Muslim,” by Lara Keay, Mailonline, October 2, 2018:

A stepfather who slammed his 12-year-old’s school for making her write a letter about ‘converting to Islam’ has been called a ‘racist bigot’ and is terrified of violent repercussions.

Mark McLachlan, 43, complained to Kepier School in Houghton-le-Spring, Sunderland when he found the homework task in his stepdaughter’s planner.

He refused to let her finish the ‘letter to my family about converting to Islam’, claiming it was ‘brainwashing’ her about the religion and did not see what it would achieve.

But since posting about it on social media he says he has received a lot of abuse.

He told MailOnline: ‘My wife and I are terrified of the repercussions.

‘Any time anybody says anything negative about Islam they are torn to shreds.

‘I’ve been called a racist and a bigot, but I’m just terrified for my children and for the way this country is going.

‘In 50 years time I can see Britain becoming an Islamic state and my children and grandchildren are still going to be alive – I don’t want them wearing a niqab.’

Mr McLachlan, who has been with the 12-year-old’s mother for five years, said he was particularly outraged by the task because he thinks she is being given a ‘false representation of Islam’.

He added: ‘She was told to google ‘Why should I convert to Islam’, but if she had researched both sides and googled ‘Why shouldn’t I convert to Islam’ she wouldn’t have been able to sleep.

‘I’ve done it and the stuff that comes up is horrific.

‘My stepdaughter is coming home talking about the Prophet Muhammad and halal meat saying Islam is the religion of peace.

‘But if she watched the news and knew about all the atrocities Islam has caused all over the world, she would know it isn’t the religion of peace at all.’

The stepfather, who also has a daughter, stressed he has ‘nothing but respect’ for the deputy head of Kepier School, who was ‘completely understanding of his concerns.

He told MailOnline the teacher has agreed to hold a meeting to review the task and address his concerns.

Nicola Cooper, the school’s principal, said: ‘At Kepier we feel it is very important to introduce our learners to all faiths and cultures and we do this throughout the academic year.

‘For example, next week we will be celebrating all faiths during National Inter Faith Week.

‘We welcomed Mr McLachlan into school earlier this week and were happy to explain to him how we explore all faiths and cultures.

‘Our Culture and Wellbeing programme of study is in line with the National Curriculum and we believe it provides the basis for a broad, balanced and engaging introduction to the areas typically taught in RE and PSHCE.’…

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD RAN MASS “HYPNOTIC INDUCTIONS” OF PSYCHIATRIC SUBJECTS AS PART OF MIND CONTROL RESEARCH

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD RAN MASS “HYPNOTIC INDUCTIONS” OF PSYCHIATRIC SUBJECTS AS PART OF MIND CONTROL RESEARCH

Funded by foundation linked to ‘computational psychosomatics’ neuro-hijacking

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/christine-blasey-ford-ran-mass-hypnotic-inductions-of-psychiatric-subjects-as-part-of-mind-control-research/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

In another stunning bombshell about the hoax accusations against Brett Kavanaugh, we’ve now learned and confirmed that Christine Blasey Ford co-authored a science paper that involves her carrying out mass “hypnotic inductions” of psychiatric subjects as part of a mind control program that cites methods to “create artificial situations.”

Internet sleuths are turning up an extraordinary collection of evidence that increasingly points to Christine Blasey Ford being involved in mind control programs at Stanford, which some claim are run by the CIA. We have confirmed that Stanford University, where Ford works, runs a “CIA undergraduate internship program” which is described in full at this Stanford.edu recruitment page for the CIA. The Stanford recruitment page for the CIA explains, “You will be given the opportunity to work with highly-skilled professionals and see first-hand the role the CIA plays in supporting US officials who make our country’s foreign policy.”

We can also now confirm that Ford is listed as a co-author of a study that carried out mass hypnosis and mind control on psychiatric subjects under the banner of “psychoeducation,” covered in more detail below.

A university professor named Margot Cleveland first tweeted the discovery, which is now spreading rapidly across the ‘net:

Margot Cleveland@ProfMJCleveland

BREAKING: This is HUGE (waiting for permission to h/t): One of Christine Ford Blasey's research articles in 2008 included a study in which participants were TAUGHT SELF-HYPNOSIS & noted hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories "AND CREATE ARTIFICAL SITUATIONS."

3:21 PM - Oct 1, 2018

• 10.3K
• 9,290 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Christine Blasey Ford confirmed to be a co-author of the mind control study

The study was published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology. The study title, abstract and authors can be confirmed at this link.

Interestingly, the study was funded by the Mental Insight Foundation (see detailed financial records, below) and was overseen by Dr. Lisa Butler of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Stanford University School of Medicine. You can confirm these facts at this link.

The full text of the research paper describes methods to “create artificial situations.” Here’s some of the actual language from the paper, which can be viewed in full at this link from Academia.edu.

…assist in the retrieval of important memories,and create arti?cial situations that would permit the client to express ego-dystonic emotions in a safe manner.

[Subjects] were given the Hypnotic Induction Pro?le (HIP; H. Spiegel & Spiegel, 2004) to evaluate their level of hypnotizability and were asked to complete a baseline packet of psychosocial questionnaires assessing life events, general functioning, satisfaction with life, and aspects of mood (including symptom levels), personality, health, social support, traumatic experience, and spirituality.

Therapist-led groups met once a week in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine to participate in an intervention that included either meditation and yoga exercises or group therapy with formal hypnotic inductions.

From this published paper, co-authored by Christine Blasey Ford, we know she is intimately familiar with mass hypnosis, self-hypnosis and mind alteration processes, all of which are being deployed in this staged “false flag” assault on Brett Kavanaugh. Through carefully crafted leaks, cover-ups and media narratives, almost half the nation has already been mass hypnotized into believing that an innocent man is a deranged serial rapist. Such is the power of CIA mind control, deployed on a nationwide scale. (It also underscores the realization that the entire purpose of the establishment media is not to inform people but to influence minds.)

The Mental Insight Foundation also funded a study on “Interoception” and “neuroimaging” to control the mind through biological intervention

If you venture even deeper down this rabbit hole, you find that the same Mental Insight Foundation that funded the mass hypnosis / mind control study on which Christine Ford work also helped fund another study called “Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap.”

This study, completed in June of this year (2018), is available at this ScienceDirect link.

The abstract for this study describes the key focus of the research:

Interoception refers to the process by which the nervous system senses, interprets, and integrates signals originating from within the body, providing a moment-by-moment mapping of the body’s internal landscape across conscious and unconscious levels.

In essence, this research seeks to find ways to control the mind through biological interventions by exploiting the “roadmap” of biology / neuro links. When the full map of how the mind interprets internal biological is understood, it allows a kind of reverse engineering of the mind through interventions in the human subject. If this sounds familiar, recall the recent revelations about the projections of inner voices through sub-audible frequencies that can essentially “plant” voices or even emotional moods into the minds of targeted subjects.

It is well known that U.S. embassy workers in Cuba were recently attacked by secret “sonic weapons” that were widely reported in the media. As The Guardian reports, the level of mind control achieved through such biological interventions can cause targeted subjects to be unable to recall specific words that would otherwise be in their vocabulary. The Guardian says:

At least some of the incidents were confined to certain rooms with laser-like specificity, and some victims now have problems recalling specific words…

The blaring, grinding noise jolted the American diplomat from his bed in a Havana hotel. He moved just a few feet, and there was silence. He climbed back into bed. Inexplicably, the agonizing sound hit him again. It was as if he’d walked through some invisible wall cutting straight through his room.

Soon came the hearing loss, and the speech problems, symptoms both similar and altogether different from others among at least 21 US victims in an astonishing international mystery still unfolding in Cuba.

Some felt vibrations, and heard sounds – loud ringing or a high-pitch chirping similar to crickets or cicadas.

Other symptoms have included brain swelling, dizziness, nausea, severe headaches, balance problems and tinnitus, or prolonged ringing in the ears.

Getting back to Christine Blasey Ford’s work on interoception / neuroimaging, the paper funded by the Mental Insight Foundation openly admits that the neuroimaging “roadmap” can alter decisions, behavior and even consciousness. It explains, “Recent years have witnessed a surge of interest on the topic of interoception due in part to findings highlighting its integral role in emotional experience, self-regulation, decision making, and consciousness. Importantly, interoception is not limited to conscious perception or even unique to the human species.”

Some other interesting text from the study:

While interoception research to date has typically focused on single organ systems, an expanded approach that assesses multiple interoceptive organ systems and/or elements is needed. Examples include targeting numerous interoceptive features simultaneously and employing different tasks that converge on the same feature (e.g., combining top-down assessments of interoceptive attention with bottom-up perturbation approaches in the same individual)…

…a host of novel tools are capable of inhibiting, stimulating, or modulating the activity of interoceptive brain networks. Noninvasive methods include the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (77), transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (78), low-intensity focused ultrasound (79), temporally interfering electric fields (80), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (81), presentation of information during different phases of visceral rhythms (e.g., cardiac systole vs. diastole) (82), and assessment of corticocardiac signaling (83).

Take a closer look at these diagrams found in the research, which details methods of “changing the world through exteroactions” and “changing the body through interoactions” in order to create “combined percept of the body in the world.”

“Computational psychosomatics”

The study openly discusses altering behavior and beliefs through the application of neurotechnology “inference-control loops” that “hijack” human anatomy to control minds. In essence, they are modeling the neurology of a human being in terms of firmware / software / hardware, then hacking the system to install their own desired beliefs and behaviors. They even call it “computational psychosomatics,” and they talk about using torture techniques to force the neurological maps out into the open, saying, “the degree of tolerance to being enclosed in a small dark chamber for 10 minutes might provide behavioral evidence verifying tolerance to triggers of interoceptive dysregulation.”

In the language of the science authors:

Eliciting surprise-minimizing (homeostasis-restoring) actions changes the bodily state and thus interosensations. This means that inference and control of bodily states form a closed loop. Inference–control loops that minimize interoceptive surprise can be cast as hierarchical Bayesian models (HBMs). Anatomically, HBMs are plausible candidates given that interoceptive circuitry is structured hierarchically 45, 94. Under general assumptions, HBMs employ a small set of computational quantities—predictions, prediction errors, and precisions 37, 95. These quantities can support surprise minimization in two ways: by adjusting beliefs (probability distributions) throughout the hierarchy [predictive coding (95)] or engaging actions that fulfill beliefs about bodily states [active inference (96)]

Additional details about the Mental Insight Foundation

We are not alleging any nefarious, unethical or illegal activities on the part of the Mental Insight Foundation. However, to help other internet researchers follow the many leads now uncovered in all this, we’re publishing public information about this foundation that’s readily available in online public tax documents.

The Mental Insight Foundation took in a whopping $18+ million in 2015, according to tax records. Its address is 538 BROADWAY STE A, SONOMA, CA 95476-6602, which appears to be a single family house.

That address is the exact same address listed by Virginia Hubbell Associates, a small firm that says it offers “consulting services for family foundations.” Its client list, found here, includes not only the Mental Insight Foundation but also:

Codding Enterprises
Levi Strauss Foundation
McKesson Foundation
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
The Public Affairs Council
Sparkletts/Alhambra Water Company
Science Alliance

Most of the clients appear to be genuinely helpful organizations for society, but they’re probably worth a second look from internet researchers. Notably, the Levi Strauss company recently came out in favor of destroying the Second Amendment by pushing gun control.

What’s especially interesting is that Virginia Hubbell Associates was paid $341,375 in just one year for “foundation management” services, according to this form 990-PF for 2015.

“Statement 11” of the document lists the officers, directors, trustees and key employees of the Mental Insight Foundation. Notably, they are all paid nothing except for the treasurer. In other words, most of the directors are paid nothing, but the management consultant is paid $341K. We are not alleging any unscrupulous activities among these individuals. They are public officers of a public foundation, listed in a public document. These individuals are:

David Herskovits of Brooklyn, NY
Robert P. Bunje of Foster City, CA
Isabelle Kimpton of Incline Village, NV
Graham Kimpton of Fairfax, CA
Barry Bunshoft of San Francisco, CA
Len Dell’Amico of Fairfax, CA
Jennifer Catherine Egan of Brooklyn, NY
Laura Kimpton of Vineburg, CA
Kay Kimpton Walker of San Francisco, CA

If you’re noticing a lot of “Kimpton” names in this list, that’s probably because one of the primary sources of income for the Mental Insight Foundation is the Kimpton Hotel Group, LLC, which generated $2.3 million in revenue for the foundation in 2015. There’s nothing illegal about that. It’s just an interesting note.

The foundation donated money to the following groups. We’re not alleging anything nefarious in this list, by the way. Rather, these are leads for other internet researchers to follow. Many of the groups this foundation donates to appear to be related to offering support for veterans, the homeless and integrative medicine:

Hoffman Institute, San Anselmo, CA
Amazon Watch, San Francisco, CA
Center for Mind Body Medicine, Washington, DC
Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore, MD
Jericho Project, Brisbane, CA
Spirit Rock Meditation Center, Woodacre, CA

More research under way… check back for more stories each morning and evening.

Is The FBI Investigation A Set Up Of Judge Kavanaugh