Translate

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

OBAMA ILLEGALLY CREATES GUN CRIME LAW FOR PATRIOTS WHILE SHEDDING TEARS OVER LITANY OF TERROR VICTIMS~BUT CONSTRAINS LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM STOPPING REAL TERRORISTS

DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CHARLATAN!
NARCISSIST ACTUALLY BELIEVES 
HE COULDN'T BE WRONG!
YOU KNOW THESE ARE TEARS 
FOR HIS PARTNERS IN CRIME: 
ISLAMIC TERRORISTS & ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS,
NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS 
WHO ARE BEING VICTIMIZED BY HIM
THE ULTIMATE LAW BREAKER SHEDS TEARS TO HELP HIS CAUSE TO CONTROL GUNS WHILE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS SET UP BASES IN AMERICA TO LAUNCH THEIR ATTACKS
WHAT AN ACTOR!
OBAMA ILLEGALLY CREATES GUN CRIME LAW WHILE SHEDDING STAGED TEARS OVER LITANY OF TERROR VICTIMS; OUR LYING DICTATOR CLAIMS SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT BEING INFRINGED WHILE DOING JUST THAT
UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATION OF CONGRESSIONAL RIGHT TO MAKE LAW

PHONY TEAR FILLED DISPLAY FOOLS ONLY THE GULLIBLE
Published on Jan 5, 2016
President Barack Obama teared up Tuesday during an emotional speech at the White House on gun control. Surrounded by gun-control advocates and family members of victims of gun violence, Obama laid out the rationale behind his recently announced slate of executive actions on guns. The president unveiled the specifics of his plan, explaining the newly clarified rules that narrow the types of individual "private" gun sellers that can sell guns without subjecting their buyers to a background checks.


ATTACK ON SECOND AMENDMENT & LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR YEARS, BUT WON'T GO UNCHALLENGED
                              

SWAMP CONGRESSIONAL PHONES NOW!

Stop the Dictator in Chief!




Obama Executive Order May Require Those Selling Even a Single Firearm to Become Licensed Dealers


Order also brings back plan to keep certain Social Security recipients from buying guns
BY STEPHEN GUTOWSKI
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes

The Obama administration announced during a conference call with reporters Monday evening that the president’s upcoming executive order may require somebody selling even a single firearm to obtain a Federal Firearms License.
During the call White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, White House Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch explained the details of the order, which will be announced publicly by President Obama Tuesday at 11:40 a.m. The action, officials explained, would include guidance on how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives will now determine who is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms under federal law and, therefore, who is required to obtain a license to sell firearms.
“ATF will make clear that whether you are ‘engaged in the business’ depends on the facts and circumstances,” Jarrett said. “On factors such as: whether you represent yourself as a dealer, such as making business cards or taking credit card statements. Whether you sell firearms shortly after they’re acquired or whether you buy or sell in the original packaging.”
“Numbers are relevant. The ATF and DOJ did not identify a magic number of weapons that makes you engaged in the business because that would limit their ability to bring prosecution.”
Jarret then said that selling as few as “two firearms” could require somebody to obtain a federal firearms license. However, later in the call, Attorney General Lynch revised that number down further. “It can be as few as one or two depending upon the circumstances under which the person sells the gun,” Lynch said.
The federal firearms license application process takes several months to complete and costs a significant amount of money, according to the ATF website.
In addition to the new guidance on who must obtain a firearms license, Valerie Jarrett announced that the president would require the Social Security Administration to begin the rule-making process for prohibiting certain Social Security recipients from legally obtaining guns, a move that could bar millions from legally owning firearms.
The order will also include a number of other initiatives, including hiring more ATF agents, increasing research into so-called “smart gun” technology, adding further state recorders to the federal background check system, and making that system operate around the clock.
_______________________________________________________

Obama's Fake Cry At Press Conference To Be Followed By Federal Harassment of Law Abiding Gun Owners; What About Obama Delivering Weapons To Isis, Who Kill Women & Children Every Day All Over The World
Published on Jan 5, 2016
President employs tearful appeal to emotion in attempt to eviscerate Second Amendment

HAMMONDS TARGETED BECAUSE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO STEAL THEIR LAND

RANCHERS DECLARED TERRORISTS, SENTENCED TO EXTENDED 
PRISON TERM FOR CONTROLLED BURNING 
OF WEED INFESTED LANDS THEY OWN, EVEN AFTER APPROVAL
Published on Jan 3, 2016
Agenda 21 Government Tyranny Ranchers Dwight and Steve Hammond is Illegally Jailed over Controlled Fire ! Burns, Oregon USA. Burns, Or.- The Controversy surrounding a small town Oregon ranching family continues to build as the Federal Government has doubled down on it’s intention to re-sentence a father and son for crimes they have already served their sentence. In late 2012 Dwight Hammond and his Son were found guilty by a jury and sentenced for a pair of arson cases. Dwight Hammond stemming from a 2001 case was sentenced and served 3 months, while son Steven was sentenced and served a year and a day term in connection to a 2006 fire. The United States Government has now decided, three years after the original sentencing, to vacate the sentence and impose a mandatory 5 year prison term on both Hammond’s under a terrorism charge.

HAMMONDS TARGETED BECAUSE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO STEAL THEIR LAND

Feds want control of Harney County's natural resources

BY KURT NIMMO
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/hammonds-targeted-because-government-wants-to-steal-their-land/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Here’s the story the corporate media will not tell you.
Dwight Hammond, 73 and son Steven Hammond, 46, were prosecuted and convicted as part of an effort to remove the Hammond family from their ranch land.
In October Tri-State Livestock News did a story on the Hammonds and the sentence they received for inadvertently burning about 140 acres of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) range land in two separate fires.
“The jury convicted both of the Hammonds of using fire to destroy federal property for a 2001 arson known as the Hardie-Hammond Fire, located in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area,” states a Department of Justice news release cited by the livestock industry trade publication.
According to the article the BLM often worked with ranchers on collaborative burns to manage invasive juniper that steal water from grass and other cover. Erin Maupin, a former BLM range technician and watershed specialist and rancher in the area, said backfires by other ranchers had burned BLM land in the past and the agency had not taken action.
During her tenure as a full time BLM employee from 1997-1999, Maupin recalled other fires accidentally spilling over onto BLM land, but only the Hammonds have been charged, arrested and sentenced, she said. Ranchers “would call and the BLM would go and help put it out and it was not a big deal.”
On the other hand, Maupin said, there were numerous instances of BLM fires spreading to private land and ranchers losing significant numbers of cattle and other property. Maupin said she was unaware of the BLM compensating ranchers for destroyed property.
BLM recklessness is not limited to Oregon:
In 2013, two South Dakota prescribed burns started by the U.S. Forest Service—over the objections of area landowners—blew out of control, burning thousands of acres of federal and private land. Ranchers that suffered property damage from the Pautre fire in Perkins County, South Dakota filed extensive tort claims in accordance with federal requirements, but will receive no compensation because USDA found the U.S. Forest Service not responsible for that fire.
Government Targeted Hammonds
As part of a deal to fend off an effort by the federal government to designate Steens Mountain as a federal monument, ranchers traded their BLM permits and private property for land on the valley floor. This allowed Congress to create a 170,000 acre wilderness in 2000.
“The last holdouts on that cow-free wilderness are the Hammonds,” said Maupin.
“It’s become more and more obvious over the years that the BLM and the wildlife refuge want that ranch. It would tie in with what they have,” Rusty Inglis, an area rancher and retired US Forest Service employee, told the trade publication.
The BLM prevented the Hammonds from watering their cattle by draining a water hole. Government scientists and resource managers supported the use of the water hole, but they were defeated by high level bureaucrats backed special interest anti-grazing groups. The Oregon Natural Desert Association worked with the government to deny the family a lease on a parcel of land that bordered the refuge “in order to expand the cow-free wilderness,” according to Maupin.
In addition, the BLM refused to renew a permit that allowed the ranchers to use a large amount of intermingled private land.
“We have done everything according to their rules and regulations and there is no reason that they should not give us back our permit. We don’t understand how a federal land management agency can ‘take’ personal private property (checkerboarded with BLM land) in this manner,” said Susan Hammond, Dwight’s wife.
During a plea agreement on the arson charge in 2012 the Hammonds agreed to allow the BLM to obtain the first right of refusal should the family sell their private land.
“The Hammond family is not arsonists. They are number one, top notch. They know their land management,” said Inglis. “We are not in Nazi Germany. We are in the United States of America.”
A Wealth of Natural Resources
After the Hammonds are gone the federal government will be free to fully exploit natural resources on federal and “monument” land in Harney County.
US Geological Survey Bulletin (1740-B) indicates there is a high potential for silver, gold, copper, mercury, uranium and molybdenum (a refractory metallic element used principally as an alloying agent in steel) and other resources in the area. There is also a moderate estimate for natural gas and oil.
The feds want to drive ranchers and private property owners off the land because on patented land (an exclusive private property land grant), which has passed into private ownership, a mining interest does not need to lease land or file a plan or notice with the federal government.
In regard to oil, the BLM “does not tell you that its share of total oil production has dropped dramatically due to substantial increases in oil production on private and state lands that are not subject to the onerous regulations and permitting delays of the federal government,” notes the Institute for Energy Research.
The Hammonds and other private property owners stand in the way of total federal monopolization of natural resources and that is why in part we are witnessing an unprecedented land grab in the West.
“Much of the land targeted for government takeover holds great oil and natural gas resources which could provide jobs in the energy industry and a flow of resources from our own American supply. Once those lands become ‘monuments’, access to those natural resources is limited and in the hands of the federal government,” explains the Property Rights Alliance.
“The government offers little explanation for the land-grab frenzy, but there are plenty of reasons to oppose it. First and foremost, it is unconstitutional for the government to simply take land from states without compensation. Second, government-controlled land takes away opportunities for development, particularly when it comes to accessing much needed resources. The land designated as ‘monument’ space could have created dozens of employment opportunities—opportunities which will go wasted under the thumb of the federal government.”