Translate

Sunday, December 3, 2017

IS DISCERNMENT BIBLICAL? THESE 14 MINUTES MAY CHANGE YOUR VIEW (OR NOT)~CONFRONTING FALSE TEACHERS (WOLVES IN THE PULPIT)

IS DISCERNMENT BIBLICAL? THESE 14 MINUTES MAY CHANGE YOUR VIEW (OR NOT)
BY PASTOR JORDAN HALL:
 CONFRONTING FALSE TEACHERS 
(WOLVES IN THE PULPIT)
 

SOUTHERN BAPTIST ERLC TWEETS GEORGE SOROS LEFTIST PROPAGANDA

 
SOUTHERN BAPTIST ERLC TWEETS 
GEORGE SOROS LEFTIST PROPAGANDA
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
In a Thanksgiving tweet, The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention declared what everyone already knew—that it is the bank for George Soros on immigration. The Thanksgiving Day tweet from the ERLC promoted a video from a group connected with the National Immigration Forum. The National Immigration Forum is a well-known Soros-funded open borders group [Editor’s Note: This was originally posted by the Capstone Report, link included below].
Here is the tweet.

The website of the group promoting the video is Christiandreamers.US. The “About” information on the site declares, “Voices of Christian Dreamers is a grassroots, Dreamers-led movement committed to changing the conversation about undocumented immigrants in the Church and beyond, through highlighting biblical teaching, personal stories and other helpful resources.”
It isn’t grassroots. The website WHOIS information shows the site was registered by the National Immigration Forum. The National Immigration Forum is backed by globalists including George Soros and Jeb Bush.
Here is the whois information.

At least 10 percent of the NIF’s funding comes from Soros, according to the organization. The Christian Post reported, “The Soros money, which has ‘plummeted’ in the last few years, is only about 10 percent of NIF’s budget and is only used for internal operations.”
Sure. Whatever the use, Soros is funding an organization trying to change the minds of folks sitting in the pews of conservative, evangelical churches.
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, “NIF receives millions of dollars from Soros groups, including support for its infiltration campaigns directed at evangelicals, police, and business.”
Infiltration is exactly what Soros and his fellow leftists are doing to evangelical Christian institutions. It is clear the Soros-funded campaign to muddle evangelical convictions on immigration is working. Now the ERLC tweets out open borders commercials from Soros’ think tank globalists.
Southern Baptists, your ERLC tweeted out political propaganda. Are you comfortable with that? Do you want your tithes and offerings intended to further missions work used to lobby against your political beliefs and interests? The ERLC is funded by the Cooperative Program and a portion of your undesignated tithes and offerings help fund Southern Baptist entities including the ERLC.
Are you comfortable with the elitist communitarians running things in the Southern Baptist Convention?
Read more from this article at the Capstone Report, here. They do some great work over there. For more information about George Soros connections to Russell Moore, click here.
________________________________________________________
SEE:
http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/01/26/russell-moore-called-open-border-zealot-soros-connections-examined/ 
 

NEW WILLOW CREEK PASTOR JOINS THE POPE, PITS GRACE AGAINST REPENTANCE

 http://www.dailyherald.com/storyimage/DA/20171013/news/171019191/EP/1/2/EP-171019191.jpg&updated=201710151104&MaxW=800&maxH=800&noborder
 http://www.livenet.ch/sites/default/files/media/317912-Bill-Hybels-rechts-mit-seinen-Nachfolgern-Steve-Carter-und-Heather-Larson.jpg
NEW WILLOW CREEK PASTOR JOINS THE POPE, PITS GRACE AGAINST REPENTANCE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Willow Creek was Saddleback Church before Saddleback. For more than 30 years, Willow Creek Community Church in the Chicago area has been the flagship of the Church Growth Movement. By watering down doctrine and adopting (in some ways, inventing) the “seeker-sensitive” approach to ministry, Willow Creek herded goats into their doors, fed them sugar blocks, and slapped the word “church” on it. In 2015, the church announced that after a year of research into its membership, it recognized that their seeker-friendly approach was a near-total failure at creating serious disciples and pledged to change their ways and focus more on teaching the Bible (novel approach, we know). Since then, Willow Creek has changed leadership and seems to be struggling to change from their doctrineless, watered-down, evanjellyfish ways. Its new upcoming lead pastor, Steve Carter, recently joined the Bishop of Rome for warm fellowship and ostensible partnership.

According to this Protestant (lol) evangelical pastor, the Bishop of Rome (aka the Holy Father, Vicar of Christ and Head of the Church – three names reserved for God the Father, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ) is the type of listener, pastor and encourager that he wants to be.
Gross.
Maybe Willow Creek’s new pastor hasn’t heard of the Protestant Reformation. Maybe he didn’t know that the Pope is the type and shadow of the antichrist who has raised himself up to be God. Maybe he hasn’t heard about things like the Council of Trent or Vatican I or Vatican II. Maybe he’s unaware of the Pope’s doctrines of papal infallibility, the immaculate conception and bodily assumption of Mary, purgatory, or denying Sola Fide. Maybe Steve Carter doesn’t know what he’s supposed to be doing or teaching. Maybe he’s just vaguely unfamiliar with Christian doctrine in general. It’s either that, or Carter himself is a wolf in sheep’s clothing who’s as wicked as the Pope himself.
Some social media followers questioned Carter about becoming an odd bed fellow with the Scarlet Harlot. His response in unsurprising, yet nauseating.

Firstly, writing as a Protestant here, heck yes the photo triggers us. Are you new to Protestantism, Steve. Why wouldn’t it trigger us, especially when it is laced with a compliment?
Secondly, what’s the thought here, Steve? Do you think you’re going to spend some time making selfies with the Antichrist and then become his text-buddy? Are you two going to exchange pen-pal letters now and you hope to sneak a rebuke for idolatry in there somewhere? Will there be tin cans with string tied betwixt them strung up somewhere between Chicago and Vatican City so that you and the Pope can have some long, heart-felt late-night talks? Is the presumption that the Pope just hasn’t heard of Christianity yet, and by his relationship with Steve he’ll come to Jesus? I mean, he’s the Pope. He’s heard of the Gospel. It’s anathematized in his church councils and he stands against all that is good and pure.
If you only had a few seconds with the Pope, what would you say? Here’s how Ian Paisley handled that opportunity.
IAN PAISLEY HECKLES THE POPE 1988:

Thirdly and most importantly, Steve Carter equates “grace” with “not telling someone they’re in sin.” This is a perverse understanding of grace for a pastor. As John Newton wrote, “Twas grace that taught my heart to fear…” To call someone to repentance is an act of God’s grace toward that individual. To meet with the Pope and not frantically tell him that he is Satan’s gimp is not gracious, it is treason against God and hatred toward whatever fleshly body currently sits in the Antichrist’s seat. Grace calls to repentance; not calling to repentance is hate.
One can expect the tenure of Steve Carter at Willow Creek to be graceless, because its pastor has tragically confused niceness with grace.
__________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
 WILLOW CREEK CHOOSES NON-MARRIED CO-ED PASTORS TO SUCCEED BILL HYBELS~FIRST MEGACHURCH TO HAVE A FEMALE LEAD PASTRIX 

BROWN UNIVERSITY: DR. DUKE PESTA-CAMPUS GENDER POLITICS HITS NEW LOW

 https://mgtvkron.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/brown-university.jpg
 BROWN UNIVERSITY
DR. DUKE PESTA: CAMPUS GENDER POLITICS HITS NEW LOW
 Dr. Duke takes on the latest campus insanity, this time at prestigious Brown University. The graduate college has decided to allow candidates to identify with the race of their choice, ostensibly to expand campus diversity. What better way to become the most diverse campus in the world than to let everybody decide what they believe they are at that moment, regardless of reality? Given this reasoning, why not just admit one graduate student, and let him pretend to be somebody of a different race, gender, and sexuality every day? Problem solved. If you are wondering what any of this has to do with education, just pretend you’re a progressive for the day, and it will suddenly make sense.
 

BRITISH DEEP DENIAL: TRUMP CANCELS UK VISIT AFTER PM THERESA MAY CRITICIZES HIS RE-TWEETS OF VIDEOS SHOWING MUSLIMS BEING VIOLENT

BRITISH DEEP DENIAL: TRUMP CANCELS UK VISIT AFTER PM THERESA MAY CRITICIZES HIS RE-TWEETS OF VIDEOS SHOWING MUSLIMS BEING VIOLENT 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
  
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Good. If she refuses to accept reality, leave her to her fantasies. Pretty soon the multiculti roof will cave in on her anyway, and she will realize Trump was calling attention to a real problem.

“She’s Blown It! POTUS Cancels UK Visit After PM May Grovels to EU, Whines Over Trump Tweets,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, December 1, 2017:
A planned “working visit” to the United Kingdom by U.S. President Donald Trump has been cancelled following Prime Minister Theresa May’s decision to publicly upbraid him over Twitter retweets.
The prime minister said the president was “wrong” to share videos purporting to show Muslims committing acts of violence while on a visit to the Middle East, where she is attempting to curry favour with local dictators.
President Trump did not hesitate to rebuke the British politician, telling her: “Don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”
News that the president has cancelled a planned “working visit” to open the new U.S. embassy in London came in the early hours of the following morning.
“The idea of a visit has obviously been floated, but not December and not January. I would not expect a Trump visit in January,” a senior U.S. diplomat told The Telegraph….
_______________________________________________________
 Pat Condell: Britain’s Hate Speech Police
Brilliant.
Britain is rapidly descending into totalitarianism and Sharia. But there is still Pat Condell.

KATE STEINLE'S KILLER ACQUITTED, SPARKING SHOCK, OUTRAGE

 http://scaredmonkeys.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Kate-Steinle3.jpg
KATE STEINLE'S KILLER ACQUITTED, 
SPARKING SHOCK, OUTRAGE 
BY BOB ADELMANN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Immediately following the announcement late Wednesday that Kate Steinle’s killer, an illegal immigrant going by the name of Garcia Zarate (he had many aliases), shown, was only going to be charged with felony possession of a handgun and not first-degree murder or even manslaughter, social media lit up. Cyrus Firth twittered: “Let’s get this straight … in San Francisco, can you: - come here illegally? YES; – Unlawfully obtain a gun? YES; - Kill an innocent girl? YES; - be found “not guilty” for all? YES. THIS IS WHAT A SANCTUARY CITY LOOKS LIKE.”
Others were more temperate. President Donald Trump, who used outrage over the killing of Steinle back in July 2015 as part of his campaign for the presidency, called the verdict “disgraceful,” adding, “No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with illegal immigration.” Attorney General Jeff Sessions blamed San Francisco’s politicians for Steinle’s death:
When jurisdictions choose to return criminal aliens to the streets rather than turning them over to federal immigration authorities, they put the public’s safety at risk. San Francisco’s decision to protect criminal aliens led to the preventable and heartbreaking death of Kate Steinle.
Jim Steinle, Kate’s father who was with her when she was shot, expressed shock at the jury’s verdict: “We’re just shocked — saddened and shocked — that’s about it. There’s no other way you can coin it. Justice was rendered but it was not served.”
The narrative surrounding the charge of murder or manslaughter in the case is familiar: an illegal alien, who had been deported five times but returned to the United States a sixth time, with a record of seven felony arrests, is allowed to go free by San Francisco authorities even when they knew ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents asked to be notified so they could pick him up for deportation. Within a few months, said illegal immigrant finds a gun, mishandles it, sending a round off the pavement and into the back of a young girl who dies within hours.
After weeks of hearing testimony the six-man, six-woman jury — three of whom were legal immigrants — deliberated for six days before reaching a verdict. They had to decide whether the shooting was intentional, or an accident. The lawyer for the alien immigrant, Matt Gonzalez said the verdict was legitimate and should be respected:
The jury’s verdict should be respected. They heard the evidence. They deliberated as a group. They heard … testimony. They looked at the physical evidence and they rendered a verdict to the best of their abilities in accordance with the law.
The challenge facing the prosecution was somewhat sizable: There was only circumstantial evidence upon which it could build a case. It had to prove that Zarate’s killing of Steinle either was both willful and premeditated, or was the unlawful killing of a human being without malice aforethought. For first-degree murder charges to stick, the prosecution had to prove to the jury “beyond a reasonable doubt” that Zarate intended to kill Steinle. The Legal Dictionary defines that term as such “that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime, thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.” The only way Zarate could have been convicted was for the prosecution to be so persuasive that the jurors “have no doubt as to the defendant's guilt, or if their only doubts are unreasonable doubts.” The prosecution had to prove to the jurors, at the very least, that Zarate pulled the trigger of the gun. His pulling of the trigger in a public place, resulting in death, would have led to a negligent homicide conviction. The jury evidently believed that the gun went off accidentally, without Zarate pulling the trigger. In gun-familiar Montana or some other state where gun owners would recognize how unusual an accidental misfire would be with that type of gun, a jury might have convicted. In San Francisco, not.
After six days of deliberation, they acquitted Zarate. All that is left is their ruling that he was a felon in possession of a gun, which demands a jail term of between 16 months and three years. ICE officials have said they will immediately deport Zarate for the sixth time once he has served that sentence.
Some good is likely to come out of this unhappy and painful incident. Attorney General Sessions said, “I urge the leaders of the nation’s communities to reflect on the outcome of this case and consider carefully the harm they are doing to their citizens by refusing to cooperate with federal law enforcement officers.”
It’s helpful to remember that if immigration laws had been respected and enforced, Kate Steinle would most likely still be alive, and Zarate would never have been in the country, much less mishandling that firearm on San Francisco’s Pier 4 on July 1, 2015. Kate may be deceased but her cause lives on.
______________________________________________________
 Kate Steinle's Family Speaks About Frustration And Grief On The Verdict Of The Case | NBC News

 
 Sanctuary Jury: Gun, Not Alien, 
Killed Kate Steinle