THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
You thought it would stop with the defaming and deplatforming of foes of jihad terror? No. Soviet-style judgments of insanity are next. And what will come after that? The answer is clear enough.
“Marine Le Pen furious after being ordered to undergo psychiatric tests,” by Ben McPartland, The Local, September 20, 2018 (thanks to Undaunted):
Marine Le Pen, the leader of the French far right has been left shocked and furious after a court ordered her to be examined by a psychiatrist to determine if she “is capable of understanding remarks and answering questions”.
Le Pen, who is head of the former National Front party – now National Rally (Rassemblement National) revealed on Twitter her shock and anger at being ordered to undertake a psychiatric assessment.
The unusual summoning is in relation to Le Pen having tweeted out gruesome propaganda images from terror group Isis that showed the bodies of people having been executed by the so-called Islamic State.
In March Le Pen was charged with circulating “violent messages that incite terrorism or pornography or seriously harm human dignity” and that can be viewed by a minor.
And as part of their investigation it appears magistrates in Nanterre near Paris have ordered Le Pen to visit a psychiatrist for an expert assessment.
“I thought I had been through it all: well, no! For denouncing the horrors of Daesh (Isis) by tweets the “justice system” has referred me for a psychiatric assessment. How far will they go?!” she said on Thursday.
The order came from the district court in Nanterre and was dated September 11th.
Le Pen photographed and tweeted out the order with the words: “It’s really incredible. This regime is really starting to worry me,” suggesting that the case was part of a government plot to discredit her.
The order calls for the tests to be carried out “as soon as possible” to establish whether she “is capable of understanding remarks and answering questions”….
Marine Le Pen posted the Isis pictures just a few weeks after the Paris terror attacks in November 2015 in which 130 people were killed.
The images included a photo of the decapitated body of US journalist James Foley.
“Daesh is this!” Le Pen wrote in a caption, using an Arabic acronym for IS, in response to a TV journalist drawing a comparison between the extremists and the French far-right.
Le Pen later deleted the picture of Foley after a request from his family, saying she had been unaware of his identity.
“I am being charged for having condemned the horrors of Daesh,” Le Pen told AFP.
“In other countries this would have earned me a medal.”
The crime is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of 75,000 euros ($91,000).
Would Twitter run a paid ad opposing jihad terror? No, I don’t think so, either.
“Twitter backlash as tweet promoting FGM is seen 30,000 times author image,” by Joe Roberts, Metro.co.uk, September 20, 2018:
Twitter has been slammed after a tweet promoting female genital mutilation (FGM) on children was viewed more than 30,000 times.
A Muslim group calling itself Dawoodi Bohra Women for Religious Freedom posted a tweet last week justifying ‘khafz’ – or female circumcision – on young girls.
The tweet featured a video of group member Arwa Sohangpurwala saying: ‘My daughters have also undergone khafz, and they’re growing up as perfectly as other children of their age.
‘As a mother, I can never do anything to harm them.’
Despite FGM being illegal in the UK, with a penalty of up to 14 years, the group paid Twitter to ‘promote’ the tweet, so it showed up on the timelines of users who didn’t even follow their account.
Twitter users immediately slammed the controversial ad.
Esmael Omar wrote: ‘Speak for yourself woman. Don’t speak on behalf of innocent girls. ‘FGM is FGM no matter how you want [to] sugar coat it. Leave alone cutting – even touching the female genitalia of a girl is still child abuse.
‘Twitter must explain why they sponsored such a message.’
Paul Hart added: ‘Did you ask your daughters beforehand or did YOU make the decision to mutilate their genitals for them? Sick.’
Ingrid Srinath said: ‘Sorry, what?! Twitter is carrying an ad FOR female genital mutilation? #FGM’
Mariya Taher added: ‘I’m wondering how Twitter can say that an ad promoting female genital cutting/mutilation doesn’t violate community standards?’
Twitter has since removed the promoted post but taken no action on the original tweet….
The Senate, by a 93-7 vote, passed an $854 billion spending bill on September 18, the bulk of the funding going to the departments of Defense, Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor, and Education. Six Republican senators — Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Mike Lee (Utah), Rand Paul (Ky.), David Perdue (Ga.), Ben Sasse (Neb.) and Pat Toomey (Pa.) — joined Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in voting against the bill.
Toomey said the legislation employed budget gimmicks that pushed spending even beyond the spending caps set earlier this year as part of a bipartisan budget deal signed by the White House. “It’s a completely dishonest gimmick to spend $7 billion above the cap that was agreed upon, and it’s really irresponsible,” Toomey remarked.
The legislation also includes a short-term stopgap bill to fund the remainder of the federal government through December 7, thus preventing a government shutdown that would otherwise begin on October 1.
In a post on Twitter on September 20, President Trump criticized the spending bill, writing:
I want to know, where is the money for Border Security and the WALL in this ridiculous Spending Bill, and where will it come from after the Midterms? Dems are obstructing Law Enforcement and Border Security. REPUBLICANS MUST FINALLY GET TOUGH!
Reuters reported that the White House has not yet said whether Trump would sign the measure, if it is also approved by the House, which will have to take up the legislation when it returns to session September 25.
A report in The Hill on September 19 noted that conservative members of the House Freedom Caucus and the Republican Study Committee (RSC), the largest GOP caucus in the House, which often held up appropriations bills in the past by making demands to cut mandatory spending and to advance other conservative priorities, were losing ground in their attempts to check government spending.
“It’s a little bit frustrating right now,” The Hill quoted Representative Mark Walker (R-S.C.), the chairman of the RSC.
One explanation for the conservatives’ loss of influence offered by The Hill was that the congressional leadership has cleverly bundled funding for the labor bill, a major Democratic priority, with funding for the Pentagon, a major Republican priority. For conservatives, voting against the package would mean voting against an increase in defense spending and a raise for the troops.
The National Sheriffs’ Association is raising private funds for border security in response to Congress blocking funds for a border wall.
So far the association has raised nearly $28,000 out a goal for $100,000 which sheriffs say will help “support the replacement and upgrades to current barriers and fencing” among other things.
100% of your tax-deductible donation will go to secure America’s southern border! Together we can save taxpayer money, make our communities safer and build American Pride!
Congress must act to pass legislation to secure our borders through enforcing immigration laws, tightening border security, support the replacement and upgrades to current barriers and fencing and construction of barriers along the U.S. and Mexico international boundary as requested by those areas where it is needed, suspending and/or monitoring the issuance of visas to any place where adequate vetting cannot occur, end criminal cooperation and shelter in cities, counties, and states, and have zero tolerance and increased repercussions for criminal aliens.
The overall goal of the campaign, according to the association, is to “help local law enforcement along the border take their communities’ safety into their own hands.”
The sheriffs seem to have taken more of an interest in border security than Congress has lately; lawmakers sent a proposed budget to President Trump on Tuesday which lacked funding for a border wall.
“I want to know, where is the money for Border Security and the WALL in this ridiculous spending bill, and where will it come from after the midterms?” The president asked in a Thursday morning tweet. “Dems are obstructing law enforcement and border security.”
I want to know, where is the money for Border Security and the WALL in this ridiculous Spending Bill, and where will it come from after the Midterms? Dems are obstructing Law Enforcement and Border Security. REPUBLICANS MUST FINALLY GET TOUGH!
In contrast, the $854 billion budget, which passed the Senate with a 93-7 vote, includes “$674.4 billion Defense appropriation, $3.8 billion to fight the opioid epidemic, $725 million for community block grants, and increases for Pell grants and the National Institute of Health,” according to UPI.
There she goes again. British Prime Minister Theresa May gave a very similar speech in December 2016. Last Monday night, she recycled it at the United Jewish Israel Appeal dinner, and included in it the same libel of me that she put in the first one. Could Theresa May herself really believe this nonsense? Does she really believe that standing against jihad terror is essentially equivalent to plotting jihad mass murder?
In the midst of a long boast about how much she opposes anti-Semitism, May said: “And I acted to keep those who peddle hatred and extremism out of our country. I kicked out Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada. I stopped Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Pastor Terry Jones – because Islamophobia comes from the same wellspring of hatred. And I stopped people like Dieudonne coming to Britain. Because nothing excuses antisemitism – not comedy, not satire, not even irony. Antisemitism is just hatred. And it is just wrong.”
So as far as May is concerned, Pamela Geller and I are the “Islamophobic” equivalents of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada. May expects her audience to be familiar with Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada, and for good reason, since both are notorious in Britain, although n neither lives there now. Abu Hamza is in solitary confinement in a super-max U.S. for, among other things, conspiring to set up a training camp for jihad terrorists in Bly, Oregon. Abu Qatada was convicted of plotting the jihad massacre of Americans and Israelis in Jordan, to which he has returned.
Now have I plotted to fly a jetliner into Big Ben, or blow myself up in a crowd of Britons? No, I’ve never plotted, called for, or approved of any kind of terrorist or vigilante violence against anyone. And thus May’s speaking of me as the flip side of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada is beyond outrageous: it’s so ridiculous that it should lead any competent member of the British Parliament to question not only her fitness to remain in office, but her sanity.
“Islamophobia,” she says, of which I am guilty and thus barred from the U.K., “comes from the same wellspring of hatred” as anti-Semitism. And so she is boasting to a Jewish group about banning me, a wholehearted supporter of Israel, and Pamela Geller, a Jewish woman, from Britain, and then claiming that she is against anti-Semitism. Pull my other leg.
May’s implication is that “anti-Muslim rhetoric” — that is, public discussion of the jihad threat and what can be done about it — leads inexorably to the demonization of Muslims and ultimately to genocide. This is ridiculous, overheated rhetoric that only hinders the prospects of any genuine discussion of the salient issues, and that is probably the goal all along.The purpose of May’s equivalence of “Islamophobia” with anti-Semitism is designed to intimidate people into thinking that criticism of Islamic jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women, gays, and others leads to the concentration camps, and thus there must be no criticism of these things. The unstated assumption is that if one group was unjustly accused of plotting subversion and violence, and was viciously persecuted and massacred on the basis of those false accusations, then any group accused of plotting subversion and violence must be innocent, and any such accusation must be in service of preparing for their subversion and massacre.
This is simply a method to foreclose on any criticism of jihad terror and Sharia oppression. By equating me with jihad terrorists, May is essentially saying that opposing jihad terror is as bad as plotting jihad terror. And that is exactly how May is acting now in her shabby little police state: British authorities are hounding and persecuting foes of jihad terror, while jihad preachers roam free and act with impunity. How will Britain look in five years, or ten, as this continues?
Future generations of free Britons, if there are any, will curse the name of Theresa May as one of the chief betrayers of their nation.
Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks, which are filled with references to drunken promiscuous parties where the attendees were not able to remember what happened, have been scrubbed from the Internet.
Christine Blasey Ford claims that Judge Brett Kavanaugh “physically and sexually assaulted” her during a party in the early 80’s when she was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, although two other people Ford claims were present when the assault happened have denied that it ever happened.
Ford’s yearbooks, which cover her sophomore, junior and senior years, the exact time frame when she claims the assault happened, portray a debauched environment of constant binge drinking and partying.
“Lastly one cannot fail to mention the climax of the junior social scene, the party,” reads one passage. “Striving to extend our educational experience beyond the confines of the classroom, we played such intellectually stimulating games as Quarters, Mexican Dice and everyone’s favorite, Pass-Out, which usually resulted from the aforementioned two.”
Another passage emphasizes how “loss of consciousness” at such parties meant that attendees only retained hazy memories of them.
“And there were always parties to celebrate any occasion,” reads one passage. “Although these parties are no doubt unforgettable, they are only a memory lapse for most, since loss of consciousness is often an integral part of the party scene.”
The passage from Chrissy Blasey’s senior year also describes how the girls would act as sexual predators towards younger boys.
“Other seniors preferred to expand their horizons and date younger men, usually sophomores, who could bring the vitality and freshness of innocence to a relationship.”
Another passage discusses a girl named Martha repeatedly throwing parties, one of which was attended by a male erotic dancer in gold g-string.
Several passages discuss drunken keg parties while parents were away.
“Cast parties, prom parties, post-game parties, pool parties, slumber parties, senior only parties, junior only parties – wherever you looked there were parties,” states one yearbook from 1982.
Another entry describes the rampant promiscuity that took place during Ford’s time at Holton-Arms, including one description of how, “Ann [redacted last name] and friends picked up some men who passed out in their apartment…”
Another entry makes reference to the “boys, beer and “the ‘Zoo’ atmosphere,” while chiding faculty and parents with the line, “Come on, you’re really too young to drink.”
Another passage emphasizes how promiscuous the girls were in their “choice of men. “No longer confining ourselves to the walls of Landon and Prep, we plunged into the waters of St. John and Gonzaga with much success.”
Other sections describe the casual racism that went on at the parties, with one girl apparently blacking up and donning an afro wig.
The fact that Ford’s high school years were replete with drunken parties which attendees could barely remember is an important detail given her apparent difficulty to remember specifics about the time when Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her.
The yearbooks appear to have been mysteriously scrubbed from the web on Monday September 17.
Girls who went to the all-female Holton-Arms preparatory school, attended by Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford, engaged in casual racism at high school parties, class yearbooks show.
Taken from Holton-Arms yearbook: Scribe 84, pg. 150 / Credit: cultofthe1st.blogspot.comOn top of openly admitting to drunken debauchery, one 1984 yearbook recently scrubbed from the web depicted a costume party where a woman wore blackface and dressed as Buckwheat from The Little Rascals – even as a black female also attended the school.
“At Cheryl’s multi-class party…[Redacted name] came as an uncanny Buckwheat, although she washed the makeup and afro off before the guys showed up,” one passage reads.
Commenting on the school’s apparent approval of casual racism, the Cult of the First Amendment blog which archived the yearbooks, noted the lax attitude over blackface costumes exemplified the student body’s “privileged attitude.”
From Holton-Arms yearbook Scribe 84, pg. 148 / Credit: cultofthe1st.blogspot.com“Seeing such insensitive racism in action at this prestigious girls academy, attended by mostly white rich girls, provides context of the very privileged attitude exhibited by the Holton-Arms all female student body. That the Holton girls got these yearbooks approved by faculty and paid for by their parents shows just how powerful they were in their own right at such a young age,” notes the Cult of the First Amendment Blog.
In another account detailed in the same yearbook, two girls came to a party dressed as “veiled terrorists,” wearing full burqas and carrying guns.
“We were confronted by…a pair of veiled terrorists, [two redacted names], were the guns real or did you just want to get served first?” the yearbook reads, showing a picture of two women in Muslim-like attire.
Another Holton-Arms yearbook from 1982, when Blasey would have been a sophomore, also includes an off-color “Hiel Hitler” joke.
Following a Heavy.com article published on Sept. 17 covering Blasey Ford’s high school years, several yearbooks were deleted from the internet containing salacious details about the elitist WASP culture at Holton-Arms where binge drinking and “pass-out” parties were the norm.
It’s important to note that while extensive attention has been paid to the high school years of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the media has thus far failed to cover these pertinent facts surrounding Blasey’s high school years, where a culture of drunken “multiple all night benders” and alcohol-induced amnesia, not to mention casual racism, appeared to be the norm.
Why were the yearbooks scrubbed?
Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please help by sharing this article on your own Facebook page.
Watch: KAVANAUGH ACCUSER SET TO CANCEL SENATE TESTIMONY AFTER SHOCKING HS YEARBOOKS REVEAL DRUNKEN SEX PARTIES, EXTREME RACISM, ADULT MALE DANCERS – AND MORE!
Also, See Kavanaugh’s Accuser’s Shocking Year Book Photos That Words Cannot Describe!
