THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
"Democratic State Rep. Amanda Bouldin took to her Facebook page Tuesday to accuse Republicans of sexism in their legislation to prohibit women from exposing their nipples or breasts in public, with the exception of breastfeeding."
DEMOCRAT REP. PRESENTS BILL TO REPEAL LAW ALLOWING RECITATION OF LORD'S PRAYER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
CONCORD, N.H. —A Democratic member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives has filed a bill that would repeal a 40-year-old state law that allows for the recitation of The Lord’s Prayer in public elementary schools.
Rep. Amanda Bouldin, who represents the Manchester area, recently filed House Bill 289, with eight co-sponsors—all Democratic.
It repeals the 1975 statute Section 194:15-a, which is stated to be dormant in that no schools in the state are currently known to engage in the practice of reciting The Lord’s Prayer in class.
“As an affirmation of the freedom of religion in this country, a school district may authorize the recitation of the traditional Lord’s prayer in public elementary schools. Pupil participation in the recitation of the prayer shall be voluntary. Pupils shall be reminded that this Lord’s prayer is the prayer our pilgrim fathers recited when they came to this country in their search for freedom,” the law reads.
“Pupils shall be informed that these exercises are not meant to influence an individual’s personal religious beliefs in any manner. The exercises shall be conducted so that pupils shall learn of our great freedoms, which freedoms include the freedom of religion and are symbolized by the recitation of the Lord’s prayer,” it states.
However, due to an advisory opinion some time ago from the New Hampshire Supreme Court—at the request of legislators—that deemed the statute to be unconstitutional, Bouldin believes that the law needs to go. She told local television station WMUR that the Lord’s Prayer statute “continues to live in our RSAs today sort of as a hidden virus.”
“Our own Supreme Court has declared it [unconstitutional] and no teacher would want to take advantage of this opportunity because they would be worried about the liability and constitutionality of teaching prayer in public schools,” she also told the New Hampshire Union-Leader.
Bouldin’s bill simply reads, “In the year of our Lord two thousand nineteen; An act relative to the recitation of The Lord’s Prayer in public elementary schools. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened … RSA 194:15-a, relative to recitation of the Lord’s prayer in elementary schools, is repealed.”
The House Education Committee heard arguments both for and against the repeal on Wednesday.
“As an educator of elementary-age children, I know how impressionable they can be and how they look to their teacher for guidance,” remarked Rep. Joshua Query, D-Manchester. “Allowing teachers to lead their class in this prayer can be confusing and intimidating to those children of different faiths.”
“Yeah, under the current laws today it would be considered unconstitutional, [but] that doesn’t make it right,” declared Josh Moore of Merrimack. “And it doesn’t make it relative to what the framers actually believed in.”
Shannon McGinley of the group Cornerstone called Bouldin’s proposal “a clear rejection of the law’s framework within which mere recitation of the Lord’s Prayer is permitted within historical context for the purpose of teaching students about what the law calls ‘our great freedoms.’”
“Ruling out recitation of the Lord’s Prayer is one thing; airbrushing it out of American history is another,” she said, according to the Union-Leader.
Webster
As previously reported, in 1828, just 41 years after the signing of the U.S. Constitution, Noah Webster, known as the Father of American Scholarship and Education, wrote, “In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government, ought to be instructed. … No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.”
He also wrote in his publication “Letters to a Young Man Commencing His Education”:
“Let it then be the first study of your early years to learn in what consists real worth or dignity of character. To ascertain this important point, consider the character and attributes of the Supreme Being. As God is the only perfect being in the universe, His character, consisting of all that is good and great, must be the model of all human excellence, and His laws must of course be the only rules of conduct by which His rational creatures can reach any portion of like excellence.”
According to the office of the chaplain of the U.S. House of Representatives, the first prayer of the Continental Congress was presented on Sept. 7, 1774 by Jacob Duche of Christ Church of Philadelphia, and was delivered in the name of Jesus.
“O Lord our Heavenly Father, high and mighty King of kings, and Lord of lords, who dost from thy throne behold all the dwellers on earth and reignest with power supreme and uncontrolled over all the kingdoms, empires and governments,” he prayed, “look down in mercy, we beseech Thee, on these our American States, who have fled to Thee from the rod of the oppressor and thrown themselves on Thy gracious protection, desiring to be henceforth dependent only on Thee.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
U.S.A. – An Extreme Risk Protection Order Bill (ERPO) has been submitted in the gun friendly state of South Carolina. This unconstitutional Red Flag Bill has been submitted by Democrat Representative Ivory Thigpen under H3275, entitled “Seizure of Firearms and Ammunition from a Person Posing a Risk of Imminent Personal Injury to Self or Others”. You can read this bill HERE: https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/bills/3275.htm
There are already 13 states that have passed these laws that have only one intended goal: to circumvent the 2nd Amendment and confiscate guns from people who are considered guilty until proven innocent.
Red flag laws are a threat to every law-abiding gun owner across the nation.
These ERPO or RED FLAG laws do absolutely nothing to target criminals, illegally owned guns, or issues with mental health. Most important, red flag laws will do nothing to save lives! However, what red flag laws will do is violate an individual's rights, such as:
1st Amendment Right to Free Speech, as a comment or even your social media can be used against you. All one needs is to have someone say they fear what a gun owner MIGHT do and they can seek an ERPO from a “judge”.
2nd Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms, obviously as their firearms are seized without cause.
4th Amendment Right to Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures goes out the window.
6th Amendment Right to a Speedy and Public Trial is lost as you aren’t made aware of the ERPO claim until the police show up to take your guns.
You also aren’t afforded your 6th Amendment Right to an Impartial Jury as the complainant goes to a judge and the order is issued…without a jury.
The 6th Amendment also guarantees your Right to Confront Your Accuser and to have Assistance of Counsel. You don’t get to know who filed the claim, never mind have your lawyer present!
The 8th Amendment affords the Right to be free from Cruel and Unusual Punishments. Being jailed and having your firearms taken away, not because you have been found guilty of a crime, but simply because you own them lawfully and someone’s feeling were hurt.
Extreme Risk Protection Orders violate every facet of Due Process and are egregiously unconstitutional laws.
South Carolina residents need to make their voices heard NOW! Contact your representatives and tell them NOT to pass H3275! You can locate your South Carolina State Legislators, and their contact information, using this link: https://www.scstatehouse.gov
If you are not sure on how to contact your legislators, you can watch this video that will explain the entire process to you. It is not difficult at all! Remember to be respectful and tell them that you will remember how they vote when their term is up for vote. Also, follow up the calls with emails and reach out to them on their social media accounts.
About Jared J. Yanis & Guns & Gadgets
With over 20 years of experience in the law enforcement field, I have learned the numerous channels used by those who would love to see our 2nd Amendment rights stripped. Because of this, I am often able to bring you the news on new bills submitted at the local, state and federal levels that look to carry out those attacks. If you are new to the channel or want to stay up to date with the constant infringements on our Constitutional Right to Bear Arms, please subscribe to my YouTube Channel at www.youtube.com/GunsGadgets
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This shows the extent to which open anti-Semitism has become mainstream and normalized on the Left today. In fact, it is likely that Omar’s paranoid hatred of Israel, rooted in Islamic anti-Semitism, made her a good candidate for this position in the eyes of Democrat leaders, who have been following a consistent anti-Israel line for years.
“House Democrats reward an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist with a place on the Foreign Affairs Committee,” by Tiana Lowe, Washington Examiner, January 17, 2019:
Lost in the incomprehensible word salad of the freewheeling, Trumpian, and mathematically illiterate performance of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., on CNN today was the more ominous fact that the Democratic Party rewarded her, an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist, with a place on the prestigious House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Omar, who replaced accused domestic abuser Keith Ellison in Congress, is no run-of-the-mill Democrat. She openly supports the boycott, divest, and sanction movement against Israel. She cozied up to Farrakhan fan Linda Sarsour on the day she entered Congress. But most damning is a tweet from 2012, in which she invokes a classic anti-Semitic trope.
“Israel has hypnotized the world,” wrote Omar in the now hotly contested tweet. “May Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine #Israel.”
Omar has conducted two interviews in the last 24 hours, in which she was given opportunities to explain the tweet. To Christiane Amanpour, Omar called the language “unfortunate,” claiming that they were “the only words” she could think of to describe Israel’s 2012 airstrike offensive in Gaza. To Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto, she said, “I don’t know how my comments could be offensive to Jewish-Americans.”
I could think of a few ways. For one thing, painting Israel as a nefarious Jewish cabal spreading its tentacles around the globe doesn’t do much to curb the idea that emphatic critics of Israel simply opposed the government and not the people. But more significantly, Omar had seven years to think of an answer, an explanation, or even straight-up lie about a political evolution in order to save face. The best she could come up with was little more than a shrug.
Even worse is that Democrats aren’t just refusing to condemn her for this — they are also giving her a prestigious committee seat that could have gone to someone who hates Jews a lot less….
_______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
Robert Spencer: Democrats Again Show Their Anti-semitism with Placement of Ilhan Omar On Foreign Affairs Committee
The Washington Examiner reported Thursday that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), whose open hatred of Jews should have rendered her unelectable to Congress, has instead been rewarded with a plum appointment to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
This shows the extent to which open anti-Semitism has become mainstream and normalized on the Left today. In fact, it is likely that Omar’s paranoid hatred of Israel, rooted in Islamic anti-Semitism, made her a good candidate for this position in the eyes of Democrat leaders, who have been following a consistent anti-Israel line for years.
“Israel has hypnotized the world,” Omar wrote in a now-infamous weet. “May Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine #Israel.”
Trying to explain that tweet, Omar only made matters worse. She told Christiane Amanpour that while her language was “unfortunate,” those were “the only words” she could find to do justice to how she felt about Israel’s defensive action in Gaza in 2012. Then she told Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto: “I don’t know how my comments could be offensive to Jewish-Americans.”
The hijabed (and therefore pro-Sharia) Omar was less delicate when she fired back online at a man who challenged the tweet: “Drawing attention to the apartheid Israeli regime is far from hating Jews. You are a hateful sad man, I pray to Allah you get the help you need and find happiness.”
All this is just the tip of the iceberg regarding Ilhan Omar. Adam Kredo reported in the Washington Free Beacon last August that while she was serving in the Minnesota state House, Omar “once voted against a state bill to stop insurance payments to those convicted of terror acts, adding more fuel to accusations the candidate represents a fringe, anti-Israel section of the Democratic Party. Omar, a Muslim Somali-American who has come under fire for her harsh criticism of Israel, was one of just two lawmakers in 2017 who voted against a Minnesota bill to deny life insurance payments to any person convicted of aiding or committing terror acts, according to official vote tallies.”
Omar does indeed represent an “anti-Israel section of the Democratic Party,” it is by no stretch of the imagination a “fringe,” at least not anymore. It is mainstream in the Democratic Party, and not just mainstream, either: it’s the future.
What’s more, she swore to apparent falsehoods in court. Steinberg also noted in last August that “Minnesota’s largest newspapers — along with every other mainstream outlet in the country — just whiffed on covering this: Signed, notarized court documents and time-stamped photos showing the Democratic frontrunner for Minnesota’s highest-profile House seat appearing to commit perjury. The common newsroom explanation, often valid, for having passed on a particular story — ‘we couldn’t independently verify it’ — simply does not apply here. The evidence…against Minnesota state Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-60B) consists of nothing but certified court filings and archived social media posts.”
But Leftists rarely have to answer for their corruption, and so in the new Democrat House, Omar is being rewarded rather than censured and investigated. She and her fellow Muslim Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib will also enjoy establishment media accolades as they pursue their hard-Left, anti-American, anti-Israel agenda. Their presence in the House of Representatives may be evidence of “diversity,” but it is also a disquieting sign of the continued dominance of identity politics, and the increasing balkanization of the American body politic. Forthrightly pro-America, pro-Israel candidates would stand little to no chance in either of their districts. And that is indicative of a much larger problem. ________________________________________________________ SEE ALSO: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/muslim-rep-ilhan-omar-called-for-lighter-sentences-for-muslims-who-tried-to-join-isis
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Kudos to Mark Krikorian and the Center for Immigration Studies for doing this. I wish them all success. If I can ever find a lawyer willing to do it, which has proven so far to be harder than I thought it would be, I will sue the SPLC myself. Their “hate group” designation for me and Jihad Watch is as defamatory as it is for the CIS, and has resulted in donations to Jihad Watch not being accepted by MasterCard and Visa, and in my being dropped from Patreon and GoFundMe. It has also resulted in my being shadow banned on Twitter and Facebook, and routinely vilified in the establishment media. The idea that opposing jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression of women, non-Muslims and others is “hate” is absurd, and the fact that so many people take it for granted is testimony to the deep pockets of the SPLC and the power of propaganda. I’ll challenge them on it legally as soon as I possibly can, although of course the SPLC and I are in a race: will they get me completely de-platformed and completely silenced before I am able to challenge their smears in court? We shall see.
“Southern Poverty Law Center Slapped with Racketeering Suit Over ‘False Hate Group Designation,’” by Matt Naham, Law & Crime, January 16, 2019:
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has filed a lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), claiming that SPLC operators Richard Cohen and Heidi Beirich have violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) by “falsely designating CIS as a hate group.”
CIS describes itself as “an independent, non-partisan, non-profit, research organization” that “pursue[s[ a single mission – providing immigration policymakers, the academic community, news media, and concerned citizens with reliable information about the social, economic, environmental, security, and fiscal consequences of legal and illegal immigration into the United States.”
The SPLC, on the other hand, describes itself on its website as “dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of our society. Using litigation, education, and other forms of advocacy, the SPLC works toward the day when the ideals of equal justice and equal opportunity will be a reality.”
If you go to the SPLC website, the CIS mission is presented as being the “go-to think tank for the anti-immigrant movement” and racism:
The Center for Immigration Studies, like the rest of the organized anti-immigrant movement we see in America today, was founded by John Tanton, a Michigan ophthalmologist turned population control alarmist whose racist beliefs stirred him to create a network of organizations with a simple agenda: heavily restricting the immigration levels to the United States in order to maintain a white majority. As Tanton himself wrote in 1993, “I’ve come to the point of view that for European-American society and culture to persist requires a European-American majority, and a clear one at that.”
“CIS’s much-touted tagline is ‘low immigration, pro-immigrant,’ but the organization has a decades-long history of circulating racist writers, while also associating with white nationalists,” SPLC continues.
Now CIS has responded to SPLC’s statements by filing a lawsuit.
CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said that SPLC has no right to “label us a hate group.”
“SPLC and its leaders have every right to oppose our work on immigration, but they do not have the right to label us a hate group and suggest we are racists,” Krikorian said. “The Center for Immigration Studies is fighting back against the SPLC smear campaign and its attempt to stifle debate through intimidation and name-calling.”
Krikorian et al. allege that SPLC damaged CIS by a “conspiracy to falsely call it a hate group.” The damages listed included termination from the AmazonSmile Program, which CIS said occurred because of SPLC’s “hate group designation.” CIS says that has cost the organization “at least $10,000 in donations to date and damages are ongoing.”
CIS argued that “Hatewatch” blog posts violated the wire fraud statute.…
Concerns are being raised after a photograph has surfaced of a 10-year-old “drag child” posing next to an adult “drag queen” who is completely naked, except for a pair of high heels and a small covering over his reproductive organs.
The Daily Wire first brought the matter to light as it shared a screenshot of the image, which had been posted to the “Queen Lactatia” Instagram page, run by the boy’s mother.
According to the outlet, the snapshot was the work of photographer Jonathan Frederick Turton, and was one of a variety of portraits for Huck Magazine, which published an article on the child on Jan. 7. That particular photograph was not included with the report.
“We would never try to overtly sexualise our child. But if he wears something that makes him feel beautiful, what right do I have to stop him wearing that dress because it might cause people to think things they shouldn’t be thinking?” she asked. “It’s a circular problem.”
“Anyone can do what they want in life,” he stated. “It doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks. If you want to be a drag queen and your parents don’t let you, you need new parents. If you want to be a drag queen and your friends don’t let you, you need new friends.”
The drag child photo is not the first time that he has faced backlash for posing inappropriately.
“In 2013, Dardo was photographed for ‘Legendary Children.’ The project focused on Atlanta’s drag scene and was exhibited at Gallery 1526. Two photos that featured their penis and gaff (an undergarment used to conceal male genitals when in drag) were covered up after complaints,” Wikipedia notes.
“There is a big difference between childhood and adulthood activity. Common sense and morality has gone into the toilet,” one commenter wrote.
“Children don’t do this on their own. They are coached and scripted. How sick that adults would exploit a child in this abusive way,” another stated.
“If the guy down the street had those pictures on his phone, he would be prosecuted—and rightly so—for child porn. Everyone involved should be,” a third opined.
“As it was in the days of Lot (Noah) so shall it be … in the day when the Son of man is revealed,” another wrote, referring to the words of Christ in Matthew 24 regarding the end of the age. “You ain’t seen nothing yet, as they say; come, Lord Jesus.”
_________________________________________________________________________
The 9-Year-Old Drag Queen Taking the World by Storm
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Various sporting events are divided into men’s and women’s categories for good reason: male athletes enjoy a significant advantage in nearly every contest of physical strength, speed or endurance. The transgender movement that seeks to classify gender and/or sex as an identity that be simply asserted or changed at-will now threatens completely to destroy women’s sports.
One by one, women’s records are being broken and competitions dominated by an influx of transgendered athletes who were born male but are now allowed to compete as women. Handball, cycling, MMA, Crossfit, weight lifting, wrestling and sprinting are just a few of the latest sports that have had their women and girl competitors pushed aside by men and boys who decided that they now identify as women and want to compete as such.
Despite the trend toward seeing gender as a social construct and biological sex just another lifestyle choice, the truth is far different. According to Dr. Paul Hruz, an associate professor of pediatrics, endocrinology, and diabetes, athletes who were born male and later try to change their sex through testosterone lowering medical procedures can never truly compete as female athletes. These biological males who face women in competition are what he calls “feminized males rather than true females.”
He went on to explain that modifying adult hormone levels is insufficient to level the playing field, “It’s really important to know that whereas hormones play a role in athletic performance, by giving a male estrogen and suppressing their normal testosterone, there are many aspects of fundamental biology that don’t change.”
Olympic rules allow for an athlete to compete as a female if their testosterone levels have remained below a certain threshold for the year prior to the competition, despite the clear advantages imparted by prior years of masculine muscle, lung, and bone development. Dr. Hruz called into question this philosophy that bases gender solely on short term hormone levels, and the results in athletic competition now support the concerns he is raising.
The trendy new sport of Crossfit will likely chose to tackle this issue in a way similar to the International Olympic Committee, by looking at a year-long history of hormone levels. Previously, athletes were required to compete as the sex of their birth.
Clearly the previous system was imperfect as well, because under the old rules, a transgender athlete who was born female but who took testosterone injections that increased her muscle mass, endurance to male-like levels would have been required to compete as a woman.
Crossfit founder Greg Glassman issued a statement pledging his full support for transgender athletes, “CrossFit believes in the potential, capacity, and dignity of every athlete. We are proud of our LGBT community, including our transgender athletes, and we want you here with us.”
As a study in unintended (or not) consequences, in a few short years the women’s division of the Crossfit games may be essentially the “transgender division”, dominated by feminized males who easily out-compete the women of Crossfit.
The world of cycling saw a round of controversy recently in the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) Masters Track Cycling World Championships when philosophy professor Rachel McKinnon took first place in the women’s 35-39 age bracket despite being biologically male.
McKinnon, “identifies as a woman” despite his obviously masculine build and an ugly Twitter feud followed the race in which McKinnon referred to other racers as “transphobic bigots” for not accepting this win. McKinnon goes so far as to deny entirely the performance advantages of male athletes.
To end the controversy, silver medalist Carolien van Herrikhuyzen apologized publicly for openly questioning the fairness of allowing biological males who feel like women to compete alongside actual women. Instead, she pledged to work behind the scenes for a rule change in future cycling competitions.
Youth sprinting is in a similar predicament with male high school students now competing as girls and, as a result, sweeping the top spots in the 100- and 200-meter dash, along with setting new “girls” records. In Connecticut, Terry Miller dominated both the 100- and 200-meter dash with records in both events during a June 4th State Competition. Miller competed as a boy during the winter track season but now identifies as a girl, so is allowed to run against other girls.
The second place finisher, Andraya Yearwood, couldn’t complain too much though because she too was born and grew up as a boy. Yearwood took first in the previous year’s Class M meet in both the 100- and 200-meter races. Several parents have already started petitions to have the rules amended to prohibit such unfair competition, but Connecticut is far from the only state seeing boys now dominate girls track and wrestling.
In the world of weight lifting, the difference between men and women could hardly be clearer. This didn’t stop New Zealand lifter Laurel Hubbard, who previously competed as a man, to decide to become a woman and then enter the women’s division.
Hubbard took the first place in the over-90kg division at the Australian International in Melbourne and at the same time set new women’s national records in both the snatch and the clean & jerk. Again, Olympic Weighting New Zealand is following the precedent set by the Olympic Games. Hubbard has plans to compete next summer Olympic games, to the likely dismay of female athletes from around the world.
One of the most notable examples of transgendered athletes enjoying an unfair advantage occurred in the MMA fight between transgendered Fallon Fox who defeated Tamikka Brents by TKO in the first round of their fight. Brents, one of the top professional female MMA fighters in her weight class, was clearly outmatched not by technique or experience but by raw power.
Fox broke an orbital bone in her skull and caused a concussion. In an interview following the fight, an injured and defeated Brents told reporters, “I’ve fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did that night. I can’t answer whether it’s because [he] was born a man or not, because I’m not a doctor. I can only say, I’ve never felt so overpowered ever in my life, and I am an abnormally strong female in my own right.”
Apart from the power of strikes that have the capacity to literally break bones, the difference in grip strength in grappling is another considerable advantage. As Brents explained, “His grip was different. I could usually move around in the clinch against…females but couldn’t move at all in Fox’s clinch.”
The rise of transgenderism could very well signal the fall of female sports competitions as biological males use their superior size, speed, strength and bone structure to outmatch naturally disadvantaged women. In an ironic turn of political correctness gone awry, divisions within sports that were meant to level competition, dividing men from women, are instead manipulated now to shut women out of competition.
For all the women who have dreams of excelling on the field, court, track or in the ring, those aspirations must now include besting not just women but also men in their sports.
BY PNW STAFF JANUARY 19, 2019
(Publisher’s comment: This has to be one of the saddest articles we have ever posted on TOL. No wonder God said through the Apostle PaulRom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God intheirknowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
You will notice that Paul said, “God gave them up unto vile affections”, and “God gave them over to a reprobate mind…”
When you consider that the U.S. is Trillions in debt it is the height of foolishness for government to finance sports at these Colleges and Universities which for the most part are sitting on untold millions in endowments and could finance their own sports programs. They are also only feeders for the Pro sports programs at no cost to them. Statistics have also shown that women’s sports have been a breeding ground for lesbianism. And now this. God being God, it may be that it is His judgment on this entire wicked enterprise. We have just seen the tip of the iceberg recently with all of the sexcapades going on in women’s gymnastics and men’s sports in the area of exploiting young girls and boys for the gratification of coaches. There is an old familiar scripture that has been quoted for 2,000 years that is still true, Gal 6:7 – “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”
Another axiom is true also, “God’s judgments are sometimes exceedingly slow, but they also grind exceedingly fine.”) Websites Links
