THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“Eggs and bricks were thrown during clashes at a campaign event for Tommy Robinson”, according to the Evening Standard. Another report from The Gateway Pundit was more direct in stating that “unhinged ‘protesters’ with the Muslim Defence League attacked Tommy Robinson and his supporters with bricks, bottles and eggs during a campaign event in Oldham.” Video evidence captured on Twitter shows that version to be true. Bricks were thrown in full force, in the same style often seen when rocks are hurled at Israelis by Palestinians.
The Muslim Defense League is aimed at “fighting #islamophobia #Racism in every Town an City in the UK,” according to its Facebook page, but yet hooliganism is acceptable for them. The larger question is: will these violent Islamic supremacist thugs be rounded up and thrown in jail for assault with weapons (bricks) where they should be? or was the promise by police that “those involved can expect to be arrested and dealt with robustly”, just lip service. Given the special treatment of Muslims in the UK and the phobia about being called “Islamophobic”, the answer is likely that there will be no followup. But Tommy Robinson on the other hand has been thrown in jail for justly pointing out criminal activity and human rights abuses by Islamic supremacists in his country; once free and democratic before the ‘values’ of creeping sharia set in.
” Rebel Media reporter Jessica Swietoniowski tweeted that she was hit with an egg and a rock.”
The shadow local government minister wrote: “It’s horrible to see our town being used for hate and division when our own future is a shared one, long after the circus has left town.”
And whose fault is that? Take a look at Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, the Palestinian territories, Somalia, Sudan, Nigeria etc etc. These are the countries where the Islamic sharia governs the political and social landscape. There is no freedom or civility in such countries, rife with violent protests, attacks or violent government “crackdowns”. A shadow of the chaos in these countries has arrived on Western soil via reckless immigration policy.
Appeasement only escalates jihadists and Islamic supremacists. Tommy Robinson stands against abusive Islamic supremacist doctrine at great personal cost and others need to support him in doing the same to stop further Islamic supremacist incursions.
“Eggs and bricks thrown at Tommy Robinson event as protesters clash with his supporters”, by Jacob Jarvis, Evening Standard, May 19, 2019:
Eggs and bricks were thrown during clashes at a campaign event for Tommy Robinson.
Projectiles were hurled as a counter protest met with supporters of Mr Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, in Oldham.
Greater Manchester Police said those responsible, many of who are not thought to be from the town, should expect to be dealt with “robustly”.
A live video, posted on Facebook by a group calling itself the Muslim Defence League, showed a group of men standing and shouting at the other crowd across a police blockade.
Some launched objects while others were heard shouting “racist scum”.
Chief Superintendent Neil Evans said: “Everyone has the right to free speech and we will always do our best to facilitate this so people can exercise this right in a safe environment.
“This evening, people took advantage of this and turned to violence, throwing objects including eggs and bricks.
“Whoever is responsible, this behaviour will not be tolerated by GMP, our partners or the people of Oldham.
“Those involved can expect to be arrested and dealt with robustly.”
They said nobody was seriously hurt though vehicles were damaged in the altercation.
Mr Robinson, who took to his media platforms to deny his supporters instigated violence, was due to make an appearance in Limeside as he campaigns for the European elections…..
“Muslim Defence League Throw BRICKS at Tommy Robinson and Supporters at Campaign Stop, Livestream the Attack (VIDEO)”, by Cassandra Fairbanks, The Gateway Pundit, May 18, 2019:
Unhinged “protesters” with the Muslim Defence League attacked Tommy Robinson and his supporters with bricks, bottles and eggs during a campaign event in Oldham on Saturday.”
The violent attack was captured on video by multiple people — and livestreamed on Facebook by the MDL themselves.
Robinson is running as an Independent in the European Parliamentary election. He is an outspoken critic of Islam and has vowed to donate his salary to help victims of grooming gangs if he is elected.
The MDL had heard about his campaign event and encouraged their supporters to attend and throw milkshakes at the candidate.
Rebel Media reporter Jessica Swietoniowski tweeted that she was hit with an egg and a rock……
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
WASHINGTON —Amid a number of states considering bills this legislative season surrounding concerns over the ongoing murder of unborn children, President Trump posted a series of tweets on Saturday evening in which he reiterated that he identifies as pro-life, but believes in the exceptions of rape, incest and the life of the mother.
“As most people know, and for those who would like to know, I am strongly pro-life, with the three exceptions — rape, incest and protecting the life of the mother — the same position taken by Ronald Reagan,” he tweeted.
Trump then touted his achievements in his tenure and urged Americans to stick with him for the next election.
“We have come very far in the last two years with 105 wonderful new federal judges (many more to come), two great new Supreme Court justices, the Mexico City Policy, and a whole new & positive attitude about the right to life,” he wrote. “The radical Left, with late term abortion (and worse), is imploding on this issue.”
“We must stick together and win for life in 2020. If we are foolish and do not stay united as one, all of our hard fought gains for life can, and will, rapidly disappear!”
As previously reported, in 2016, while still a presidential candidate, Trump wrote in an op-ed published by the Washington Examiner, “Let me be clear — I am pro-life. I support that position with exceptions allowed for rape, incest or the life of the mother being at risk.”
He also told NBC’s “Today” show that same year that he would like to see the exceptions in the Republican platform.
“The Republican platform, every four years, has a provision that states that the right of the unborn child shall not be infringed. And it makes no exceptions for rape, for incest, for the life of the mother. Would you want to change the Republican platform to include the exceptions that you have?” asked co-host Savannah Guthrie.
“Yes, I would,” Trump replied. “Yes, I would. Absolutely. For the three exceptions, I would.”
Trump’s statements allowing for exceptions are similar to those made by other recent Republican presidents, including George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.
“My own position on abortion is well-known and remains unchanged. I oppose abortion in all cases except rape or incest, or where the life of the mother is at stake,” George H.W. Bush said in 1992.
”My position has always been three exceptions: rape, incest and the life of the mother,” George W. Bush likewise outlined in 2006.
Following the passage of a bill in Alabama last week that would ban abortion with the exception of a “serious health risk” to the mother, several prominent Republican politicians came out in opposition to the measure because it did not also include rape and incest exceptions.
“I don’t support the Alabama law,” Utah Senator and former presidential candidate Mitt Romney told CNN. “People have gone to the wings, if you will. I think something much more towards the center makes a lot more sense.”
A spokesman Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell also stated, “He opposes abortion except in the instance of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is in danger.”
“[The Alabama bill] goes further than I believe,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy likewise told reporters. “First of all, I believe the most precious gift God gives us is life. And I’ve defended my pro-life position for my whole political career. But in my whole political career, I’ve also believed in rape, incest, and the life of the mother as exceptions.”
However, Rebecca Kiessling of Save the 1, who was conceived in rape and now is a voice against killing children for the crimes of their fathers, lamented the president’s post, writing on social media, “There’s nothing quite like getting singled out for death by your president.”
“[R]egardless of how the child came into existence, … the child conceived is still a child,” also wrote the World Life Organization. “As a society we must not tolerate or condone in any way murdering the child as an option. And until we make this strong stand, without exceptions, I believe nothing will significantly change and our nation will continue to have presidents who make ludicrous and immoral statements such as this.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“It’s happened. Again. Jews harassed for the horrible crime of being Jewish on the streets of New York City. This time it was two Hasidic thirteen-year olds in Boro Park, near the post office at 12 avenue and 51 street. They were walking home from the Skulener and Bobover Rebbes’ Tisch early Saturday morning at 1:30AM when they were harassed by 4 men in a vehicle (with TLC plates) who yelled “Allah Akbar” sending the two boys away in terror. The car sped up after them, and one of the men yelled “Do you know Hitler? We love Hitler!””
This is the result of a longstanding appeasement of jihadists and their ideology in Western countries and tolerance of their hatred, as well as Palestinian hatred against the Jews. The more emboldened Islamic supremacists get, the more aggressive they will become. While the report does not state explicitly that the four men in the car were Muslim, we do know that they shouted the Arabic phrase “allah akbar“, a derivative of allahu akbar , meaning “god is greatest”. We also know that Islamic anti-semitism is on the rise, from Congress on down.
“The two teens were terrified, and one of the boy’s parents reached out to Dov Hikind right after Shabbos to let him know what happened.” Hikind asks in a statement:
The “wake up” period won’t last forever, and soon enough we just may find ourselves well beyond the point of no return if we do not take immediate and serious action against antisemitic violence and harassment anywhere and everywhere it manifests. Will any leader stand up to the task? All indications are they’re out to lunch.
Will Bernie Sanders continue stand by his “Muslim brothers and sisters” here too? or will he take Islamic anti-semitism to task? We know the answer to that question.
“HATE IN BORO PARK: 4 Men in Car Yell at Hasidic Boys: “Allah Akbar; Do You Know Hitler? We Love Hitler”, Yeshiva World, May 19, 2019:
It’s happened. Again. Jews harassed for the horrible crime of being Jewish on the streets of New York City. This time it was two Hasidic thirteen-year olds in Boro Park, near the post office at 12 avenue and 51 street. They were walking home from the Skulener and Bobover Rebbes’ Tisch early Saturday morning at 1:30AM when they were harassed by 4 men in a vehicle (with TLC plates) who yelled “Allah Akbar” sending the two boys away in terror.
The car sped up after them, and one of the men yelled “Do you know Hitler? We love Hitler!”
The two teens were terrified, and one of the boy’s parents reached out to Dov Hikind right after Shabbos to let him know what happened.
Hikind tells YWN that he immediately mobilized and accompanied them to the local police (66th) precinct where they filed a report. The case is being referred to the NYPD’s Bias Unit as the use of a vehicle constituted a physical threat.
In a statement, Hikind says:
“To say this is horrifying, or that it’s unacceptable is meaningless in the face of events that seem to be totally out of control. There aren’t enough words to continuously express shock, outrage, and discontent with the unfolding situation of antisemitism in America, and particularly in New York City. The “wake up” period won’t last forever, and soon enough we just may find ourselves well beyond the point of no return if we do not take immediate and serious action against antisemitic violence and harassment anywhere and everywhere it manifests.
Will any leader stand up to the task? All indications are they’re out to lunch.”….
Roberta Morrison Gilbert teaches about NAR, what it is, its influence in the church, and it's historical beginnings. She has come out of this movement and stresses how important it is to test all things by studying the Bible for yourself and asking the Lord to lead you into the truth and not just what man says the Bible says. This channel is supported by viewers. If you would like to support this channel, go to: https://www.livinginhispresence.org/g...
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A Washington school district “promoted Islam through a Ramadan policy that provides special privileges for Muslim students”, but fortunately a “legal team has dispatched a cease-and-desist letter.”
This is how far the school went, after CAIR suggested “various changes in policy and practice that would benefit Muslim students”…
The policy directs teachers to create “safe spaces” for Muslims, plan with Muslim students to let them “quietly slip away” from class for prayer, “privately offer information” about nutrition during their Ramadan fast, give “a lesson” on Ramadan and privately ask Muslim students what accommodations they want.
“CAIR also suggested that teachers greet students in Arabic… as part of the Ramadan policy.”
The school’s efforts was promoted through the Diversity & Equity Department. Such programs need to be revamped fast. They serve as the playground for Islamic supremacists to speedily advance their agendas, while the imprudent leaders who run such programs eagerly serve such agendas. And they do it on your tax dollars.
CAIR did not get away with it this time, but the group is sure to keep trying.
“2ND U.S. SCHOOL DISTRICT CAUGHT PROMOTING ISLAM”, World Net Daily, May 12, 2019:
A legal team has dispatched a cease-and-desist letter to a school district in Washington state that promoted Islam through a Ramadan policy that provides special privileges for Muslim students.
It’s the second district in the state found to have the special policy in just the last week.
The Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund confirmed it has written to Michelle Reid, superintendent of the Northshore School District in Bothell, Washington, to insist that the policy be revoked.
The policy directs teachers to create “safe spaces” for Muslims, plan with Muslim students to let them “quietly slip away” from class for prayer, “privately offer information” about nutrition during their Ramadan fast, give “a lesson” on Ramadan and privately ask Muslim students what accommodations they want.
FCDF warned that if the district does not revoke the policy and begin compliance with the First Amendment, “then parents and students will have a legal cause of action against you and the school district.”
While students are allowed to practice their religion, the team said, and “nothing in the Constitution prohibits public schools from accommodating students’ religious exercise,” public schools are not allowed to have policies or practices that “convey a message that a particular religion, or a particular religious belief, is ‘favored.’
“Administrators and teachers must never be placed in the position of monitoring a child’s compliance with a particular religious requirement, such as prayer, dietary restrictions, or wearing a head covering,” the letter said.
The First Amendment requires, in those circumstances, neutrality on religion, the letter said.
FCDF said the district must “restore the rights of non-Muslim students of faith to be treated equally under the law” and review all instances in which the school’s Ramadan policy was enforced.
The letter followed “multiple complaints” to FCDF from members of the Bothell community as well as a teacher.
It was the district’s Diversity & Equity Department that recently issued the guidelines for Muslim students during Ramadan.
“The school district’s so-called Ramadan ‘accommodations’ run roughshod over the First Amendment and are a blatant insult to students of other faiths,” said Daniel Piedra, FCDF’s executive director. “Under the mantle of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion,’ school officials have exalted Islam as the state-sponsored religion. Teachers and parents are outraged, and they should be.”
Just days earlier, FCDF sent a similar letter to the Dieringer School District in Lake Tapps, Washington, about the same issue.
The Ramadan policy had been recommended by the terror-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations….
It’s a rare statement to hear in this era of politically correct conformity. And one in which Catholic, Protestant and Jewish organizations, at least in America, have been corrupted by cashing in on refugee resettlement for Muslim migrants.
ROME, May 17, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) ― Resisting “large-scale Muslim immigration” is “a responsible exercise of one’s patriotism,” Cardinal Raymond Burke said today.
The Cardinal made the remark at this afternoon’s Question and Answer session at the Rome Life Forum in Rome. The session immediately followed Burke’s address on filial piety and national patriotism.
Burke responded by saying that the Church’s teaching on immigration, which he had discussed in his speech, supported individuals who are “not able to find a way of living in their own country.”
“And this is not true of immigrants who are opportunists, in particular in the case of Islam, which by its definition believes itself to be destined to rule the world, coming in large numbers to countries,” he said.
“You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see what’s happened, for instance, in Europe, in countries like France and Germany and also here in Italy. And it’s also happening in the United States.”
Burke cited a book called No Go Zones which, he said, “records places in the United States where, in fact, Muslim immigrants have set up their own legal order.”
“In other words, they resist the legitimate authority of the state,” he continued.
These comments may sound surprising, but Cardinal Burke has made similar remarks in the past, as Hugh Fitzgerald had noted in 2016 right here at Jihad Watch.
The other day, a senior Cardinal in Rome, Raymond Burke, gave an astonishing interview to the Religion News Service. He stated that “there is no question that Islam wishes to govern the world” and “criticised Christian leaders who “simply think that Islam is a religion like the Catholic faith.” That is not true, Cardinal Burke insists, for if Muslims become a majority in any country they “have the religious obligation to govern that country.” Burke says there are already “little Muslim states” within France and Belgium that are no-go areas for the police and are run, essentially, by local Muslims for the local Muslim population. Burke insists that the only way for Europe to withstand the relentless onslaught of Islam is “to return to its Christian roots.”
“A GP has revealed he is planning to quit medicine over an investigation by the doctors watchdog into claims he ‘discriminated’ against a Muslim woman for asking her to remove her veil.
“Dr Keith Wolverson said he ‘politely’ asked the woman to take off the garment for patient safety reasons during a consultation last year because he was unable to hear her explain her sick daughter’s symptoms.
“He was then ‘deeply upset’ when last week he received a letter from the General Medical Council, the professional regulator, informing him that he was subject to an inquiry over allegations of racial discrimination which could result in him being struck off.
“Last night, Dr Wolverson, who has practised as a GP for 23 years and has an unblemished record, said regardless of the outcome of the investigation he now plans to leave his job.
“He said: ‘I feel a major injustice has taken place. This is why you are waiting so long to see your GP and doctors are leaving in droves. This country will have no doctors left if we continue to treat them in this manner. I’m deeply upset.
‘A doctor’s quest to perform the very finest consultation for the safety of the patient has been misinterpreted in a duplicitous manner to suggest there has been an act of racism committed. I absolutely no longer want to be a doctor.’
“Dr Wolverson told how the Muslim woman brought her daughter, aged ten or 11, to see him at a walk-in centre at Royal Stoke University Hospital in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, last June.
“The doctor said he asked the woman to remove the veil as he was unable to hear her explain her sick daughter’s symptoms because of the niqab she was wearing
“The mother said she was concerned the child had tonsillitis.
‘But the 52-year-old GP struggled to hear the mother’s account of the girl’s health problems because her speech was being obscured by her niqab – a garment worn by some Muslim women that covers the body and face apart from the eyes.
“The doctor said he ‘politely’ asked the woman to remove the veil covering her face so he could be sure what she was saying.
“I asked her, would you kindly remove your face veil please because it makes communication very difficult,’ Dr Wolverson explained. ‘Normally this issue doesn’t arise because patients automatically do so.
‘“One would think that any parent would be wholly supportive and grateful that a doctor was trying to safely treat their child.”
“According to Dr Wolverson, the mother complied with his request without raising any objections.
“But half an hour after the consultation, her husband arrived and declared he was making a complaint about the GP’s behaviour.
‘He sat outside my consultation room and threateningly made eye contact towards me whenever I went out to fetch each patient,’ Dr Wolverson said. ‘He then made a formal complaint and I was prevented from working at the walk-in centre again.’
“It has since emerged that NHS bosses sent the GMC a form outlining the complaints. It says the woman told the doctor she did not want to remove the veil on religious grounds but he refused to continue the consultation unless she did.
Should we not believe Dr. Wolverton, when he said the child’s mother “complied with his request without raising any objection”? There are two possible reasons for her to have changed her story. It might be that she herself changed it to a tale of forced removal, so as to avoid being punished by her husband for having voluntarily removed the covering over her face. Or another obvious possibility: the husband, enraged at the doctor’s request to his wife, decided to have her change her story, and to now claim that the doctor had threatened to end the consultation unless she removed her face veil. And then the husband could make those wild charges of “racism” and “discrimination,” and malevolently get the doctor in deep trouble for trying tonly o do the best job he could.
“Dr. Wolverson is now facing an inquiry but he said that, regardless of its outcome, he does not want to work as a GP anymore.
“It claims he was ‘rude’ and ‘gave her a dirty look’, leaving her shocked and crying. She said she felt ‘victimised and racially discriminated’ against.
His “unblemished record,” including the fact that he had treated, without any complaints, many Muslim patients (which is why he could claim that “normally this issue doesn’t arise because [niqab-wearing] patients [when asked to uncover] automatically do so”), make Dr. Wolverson’s version fair more credible than that given by the husband. Who in his right mind does not see the husband’s version as a made-up story, with that supposed “dirty look” of the doctor that left the wife “shocked and crying”? Why did no one else at the doctor’s office apparently see her shocked state, or hear her crying?? And as for that all-purpose Muslim complaint of feeling “victimized and racially discriminated against,” such claims of victimhood by Muslims are standard fare and must be taken with a grain of salt. She “felt victimized” does not mean that she was “victimized.’; There is a real victim here — the doctor himself – who has been so disturbed by the unfair charges made against him and the GMC investigation, that he vows even if he is absolved, he has decided to give up his practice altogether. That’s a real, rather than factitious victim.
The mother was not the “victim” of anything but the doctor’s praiseworthy attention.. A careful GP taking a history, he wanted to hear –very clearly — her description of her daughter’s symptoms, and for that she needed to remove the face veil. As fo the mother’s charge of being “racially discriminated” against, for the millionth time we all must insist that Islam is a faith, not a race, that any anti-Muslim attitudes or behavior are not expressions of “racism,” no matter how many times Muslims and their apologists maintain otherwise. In any case, there is nothing to suggest that Dr. Wolverson has ever been anti-Muslim in any way; his only interest was in hearing what the mother was saying.
“Joyce Robins, from Patient Concern, said losing a doctor over the issue would be ‘criminal’. ‘A doctor needs to be sensitive to a patient’s religion but safety must always come first,’ she added.
“A spokesman for The Doctors’ Association UK said: ‘It is of utmost importance that the religious wishes of our patients are respected. However, evidently there are some circumstances where removal of a nib or burka is necessary for medical assessment and treatment.
‘The GMC should consider issuing clear guidelines to protect both doctors and our patients.’
“Human rights campaigner Aisha Ali-Khan tweeted: ‘I don’t believe [a] doctor should be prosecuted for doing his job *but* he should have asked for a female third party to help, or asked the patient to write down her medical complaints.’
How would a “female third party” have helped in this situation? Would she act as a kind of chaperone? What exactly would be her role? The mother had been asked by the GP only to uncover her mouth, so that she could be heard more clearly. Is it likely that this woman, for whom English was a second language, would be able put in writing her observations of her daughter’s illness? Isn’t it more likely that she was unable to write in English? And even if she could read and write in English, in a situation where the doctor has a series of questions to ask about the patient’s condition, think of how complicated and laborious it would be for the doctor to have to first write out a question, wait for the mother to read it, then write out her answer, and then, based on that answer, the doctor would write out another question, then wait for her to write out her answer, and so on. Doctors have a right to question patients (and in the case of children, their parents) as best and as efficiently they can, which here means taking a history orally from the patient’s mother.
How can it be “discrimination” for a GP to try to give the child patient the best possible care by ensuring he has heard from her mother, in a clear voice, about the child’s symptoms? How is it “discrimination” to ask the mother to remove her face veil in order to be able to hear her otherwise niqab-muffled voice? Dr. Wolverson has testified that when his other niqabbed patients were asked to remove the veil, they all complied without incident.
Here is a GP, being investigated because of complaints by a Muslim couple who claim that the wife has been “discriminated” against and has been the victim of “racism” for having been asked to remove her face veil. Apparently they want the GMC to ignore the doctor’s explanation that he had politely requested the mother to remove the face veil so that he could better hear her describe her daughter’s symptoms, and that she had promptly done so. All the rest of the Muslim couple’s tale — the wife being left “shocked and crying” at Dr. Wolverson’s request, the “discrimination” and “racism” she supposedly felt is the kind of whipped-up hysteria and victimhood that Muslims so often engage in. There is no evidence for the wife’s supposedly shocked mental state, or her anguish at supposed “discrimination” and “racism.” No one at the doctors’s office noticed anything untoward.. We have only the wife’s own testimony, which was likely scripted for her by her husband; against this we have the testimony of a doctor who has been practicing, for 23 years, with an “unblemished record”– not a single complaint against him until now– of serving Muslim and non-Muslim patients alike.
It would be nice to think that not only will these wild charges made against Dr. Wolverson, both baseless and cruel, soon be dismissed, but that the parents will be condemned by the GMC for attempting, with these false charges, to harm the reputation of a blameless doctor for doing nothing more than trying to clearly understand a patient’s condition.
The doctor has been greatly disturbed by these grotesque charges, and being made subject to the humiliation of an investigation by the General Medical Council. How many others, not only physicians, but teachers, policemen, lawyers, salesmen have been, or will be, vilified, like Dr Wolversson, by Muslims quick to charge others with non-existent ‘‘discrimination” and “racism”? Dr. Wolverson has announced that he will be leaving his practice altogether. Great Britain already has a shortage of GPs. Is this the result the authorities want? _____________________________________________________________ SEE ALSO: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/uk-thousands-rally-behind-doctor-forced-out-for-politely-asking-muslim-woman-to-lift-her-veil
— ♠️the🧢TRUMP🥊card♠️ (@TRUMPED_in_2020) May 20, 2019
Thousands of Trump supporters attended the event at Williamsport Regional Airport in Montoursville.
Despite the woman who made the threat locking her Twitter account, screenshots of the tweet were sent to Buffalo Wild Wings headquarters and the FBI by Michael Conroy and others.
“Just spoke w/ the Williamsport, PA BWW’s location,” he posted to Twitter. “They confirm they are the closest to Montoursville. They r aware of the issue, seemed to confirm it WAS one of their employees who posted that tweet, apologized PROFUSELY, & said that they r ‘addressing issue as we speak.’”
Twitter users called for the woman to be permanently banned from the food service industry, while others called for her arrest.
In another twist, the person who first drew attention to the threat,a Twitter user called @ARTalon1, had their account suspended. Whether the suspension is related to this story remains unknown.
WASHINGTON —
