THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
WASHINGTON —Vice President Joe Biden announced this week that he had officiated a same-sex “wedding” between two White House staffers at his home in Washington.
He Tweeted a photo of the occasion on Monday, writing, “Proud to marry Brian and Joe at my house. Couldn’t be happier, two longtime White House staffers, two great guys.”
Brian Mosteller works as director of Oval Office operations for Barack Obama, and Joe Mahsie serves as a travel coordinator for Michelle Obama.
Biden obtained a temporary certificate to officiate the ceremony as per the men’s request. Biden’s wife, Jill, also Tweeted the photo after the ceremony, writing, “Love is love.”
As of press time, Biden’s Tweet has generated over 137,000 likes and over 42,000 shares.
As previously reported, in 2012, Biden publicly announced his support for same-sex “marriage,” just days before Barack Obama did likewise.
“I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying one another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties,” he said.
But CNN reported at that time that “Biden has, in the past, counseled the president against coming out for same-sex marriage.”
Last October, Biden spoke at a gala hosted by the homosexual advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, and expressed his support for the federal Equality Act, which would amend the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act to prohibit employers from firing workers because of their homosexuality and ban landlords from turning down homosexuals who wish to live with their partners.
“The great arc of justice is the journey of this nation, and it continues to move in the right direction,” he said, remarking during his speech that homosexuals left the U.S Supreme Court “no choice.” “We’re moving closer and closer to the animating spirit of America because of all of you, not me, because of all of you.”
Biden, a Roman Catholic, has likewise attended homosexual pride events at the White House and has stated that he believes transgenderism is “the civil rights issue of our time.”
As previously reported, homosexuality was outlawed in early America as a number of states passed sodomy laws under their criminal statutes, banning sexual activity between those of the same gender due to biblical prohibitions against it.
Romans 1:26-27 reads, “For this cause, God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another: men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.”
Jesus also said in Mark 10:6-8, “But from the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife, and they twain shall be one flesh.”
“By 1791, when the original 13 states ratified the Bill of Rights, they all treated sodomy as a criminal offense,” chronicles on early American history state.
In 1778, General George Washington, the first president of the United States, ordered Lieutenant Frederick Gotthold Enslin to be drummed out of the camp for “attempting to commit sodomy” with a male soldier.
His March 14th proclamation stated, “His Excellency, the Commander in Chief, approves the sentence, and with abhorrence and detestation of such infamous crimes, orders Lieut. Enslin to be drummed out of camp tomorrow morning by all the drummers and fifers in the Army never to return; the drummers and fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at guard mounting for that purpose.”
The Islamic State terror group has come out publicly to reject Pope Francis’ claims that the war being waged by Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature, assuring the pontiff that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
The Islamic State terror group has come out publicly to reject Pope Francis’ claims that the war being waged by Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature, assuring the pontiff that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
In the most recent issue of Dabiq, the propaganda magazine of the Islamic State, ISIS criticizes Pope Francis for his naïveté in clinging to the conviction that Muslims want peace and that acts of Islamic terror are economically motivated.
“This is a divinely-warranted war between the Muslim nation and the nations of disbelief,” the authors state in an article titled “By the Sword.”
The Islamic State directly attacks Francis for claiming that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Quran are opposed to every form of violence,” saying that by doing this, “Francis continues to hide behind a deceptive veil of ‘good will,’ covering his actual intentions of pacifying the Muslim nation.”
Pope Francis “has struggled against reality” in his efforts to portray Islam as a religion of peace, the article insists, before going on to urge all Muslims to take up the sword of jihad, the “greatest obligation” of a true Muslim.
Despite the obviously religious nature of their attacks, the article states, “many people in Crusader countries express shock and even disgust that Islamic State leadership ‘uses religion to justify violence.’”
“Indeed, waging jihad – spreading the rule of Allah by the sword – is an obligation found in the Quran, the word of our Lord,” it reads.
“The blood of the disbelievers is obligatory to spill by default. The command is clear. Kill the disbelievers, as Allah said, ‘Then kill the polytheists wherever you find them.’”
The Islamic State also reacted to Pope Francis’s description of recent acts of Islamic terror as “senseless violence,” insisting that there is nothing senseless about it.
“The gist of the matter is that there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality,” they declare, adding that their hatred for the Christian West is absolute and implacable.
The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah [tax for infidels] and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you.
In a recent press conference, Pope Francis told journalists that the world is at war. “But it’s a real war, not a religious war,” he said.
“It’s a war of interests, a war for money. A war for natural resources and for the dominion of the peoples.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“I am aware of the first amendment arguments that some have made,” University of Houston Student Government President Shane Smith said in a statement. “Yes, Rohini [Sethi] had a right to say what she did. Identically, students also have that same right to voice their complaints. The first amendment prevents a person from being jailed by the government for what they say. But the first amendment does not prevent people from receiving consequences for what they say, including workplace discipline.”
Smith was addressing the suspension of the student body’s vice president, Rohini Sethi, in retaliation for her daring to post on Facebook, “Forget #Black Lives Matter; more like #AllLivesMatter.”
Sethi made her post shortly after the murder of five police officers in Dallas by a man who expressed support for the Black Lives Matter movement.
Smith rightly said that students who disagreed with Sethi have the “right to voice their complaints.” But of course, only Sethi was punished for her Facebook post. Those who voiced disagreement with her comments that “#AllLivesMatter” were not punished. On the contrary, they were commended by the politically correct crowd.
As breitbart.com reported, Sethi was apologetic for her words, but her apology wasn't enough to appease the left-wing radicals of the Student Government:
“Thursday night as our nation recoiled in shock, I took to Facebook and shared in a way that was inappropriate given the context and my position,” she wrote on Faceboook. In that moment, I did not act as your Vice President, I acted, in my own flawed way, as many do when presented with a tragedy from afar. My response has caused enormous pain for many members of our community, and I think it is high time that I clarify my statement.”
She continued to explain saying, “Visually we are black, white, tan, and a hundred shades between but we are all human, thus I believe that all lives matter. Let’s all come together through conversations to reach unity. This is how we begin to set the standards for ourselves and our future, especially in times of adversity.”
And the punishment handed down by Smith, who was delegated the power by the student senate to decide Sethi’s sentence, was harsh. Her 50-day suspension as a student government leader means that she will lose her stipend during that time. For expressing criticism of the Black Lives Matter movement, Sethi has also been ordered to attend a diversity seminar. If she fails to attend, she will be impeached and removed from office.
And, what is Sethi expected to “learn” at the seminar?
Known as the Libra Project diversity workshop, the seminar to be held this month will include such topics as Race Relations, White Privilege, LGBTQ rights, Islamophobia, Antisemitism, Gender inequality, Racial profiling, "Harmless" off-color jokes, Black Lives Matter versus All Lives Matter, School to prison pipelines, Personal responsibility versus institutional oppression, Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination, and Aggression. Perhaps they just forgot to include topics about discrimination in hiring for Christians and conservatives on college campuses such as the University of Houston.
In addition, Sethi has been ordered to attend three cultural events each month, and write a reflection letter — in which one supposes it will be incumbent upon her to express proper re-education to progressive dogma. She will be expected to say she loves Big Brother.
Student senators certainly have learned that progressive dogma now includes delegating power to The Leader. By a vote of 14-2, with one abstention, the University of Houston student government empowered the president of the student body, Shane Smith, to punish Rohini Sethi as he wished.
Paul O’Brien was one student senator who was not happy with leaving it up to Smith to mete out any punishment he so desired. “We just gave him the one-time power to fire the only person in that office that could tell him no, which could last a day or the entire administration,” O’Brien asserted, adding that the power of the senate had been “undermined.” It reminds one of how the members of Congress routinely surrender their constitutional powers to the president, with such provisions as “fast-track authority” on trade deals, or open-ended authorizations for the president to use military force when, where, and how he wishes.
It even reminds one of President Barack Obama’s bragging that he has a “pen and a phone” to issue executive orders.
President Smith certainly appears convinced of his own importance in the world. “As with any decision I make," he declared, "I will face significant criticism, both internally and externally. That comes with the job — this role isn’t meant for making simple decisions. Leadership is rarely easy or fun — it means determining what the right decision is and making it, regardless of whether the decision is popular.”
Good grief. One would think Smith had just made the awesome decision of when and where to send American troops to hit the beaches of Normandy. Referring to Sethi’s Facebook post, Smith conceded, “It is a fair point that one ignorant media post alone may not warrant such actions. However, serving in a public role means that we are held to a higher standard — and rightfully so.”
And it is simply ludicrous that Smith has made some heroic decision against what is popular. The person who made the unpopular statement at the University of Houston was Rohini Sethi, not Shane Smith. Smith even contradicts himself in his statement. In one instance, he gives the appearance that he had to make some courageous decision that might not be very popular; then in the next instance he says, “I think my responsibility is to do what the students ask and what the Senate believes is best.” So does this mean that if they passed a resolution saying, “All lives matter,” it would be his responsibility to carry out the will of the Senate? Is he saying that might makes right?
After Sethi made her post, the Black Student Union, along with Alpha Phi Alpha, a predominantly black fraternity, called for her resignation from student government. The Black Student Union, in a statement posted on Twitter, complained that Sethi’s post was dismissive of the Black Lives Matter movement, which they argued was just a social movement seeking equal protection under the law for people of color, especially at the hands of the police.
In reaction to the suppression of Sethi’s freedom of expression, the administration of the University of Houston issued a statement that appeared to contradict the harsh sanctions placed upon Sethi. “The University of Houston has become aware that the Student Government Association (SGA) has suspended its vice president, Ms. Rohini Sethi, from participating in SGA activities. Actions by SGA, a registered student organization subject to its own governance, are not University actions and do not affect the academic standing of a student at the University of Houston. The University of Houston continues to stand firm in support of free speech and does not discipline students for exercising their constitutional rights.”
To sum up this situation, student Rohini Sethi has been suspended, and may eventually be fired from her job, simply for expressing a political viewpoint that was unpopular with the majority of the members of the Student Government Association. Interestingly, back in the 1940s, those on the Left bemoaned that some writers, actors, directors, and others in the motion picture industry were placed on a "do not hire" list — The Hollywood Blacklist — simply because they were members of the American Communist Party.
As was known then, and is certainly known today, the American Communist Party was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Soviet Communist Party, run by the mass-murdering dictator Joseph Stalin. Yet, to hear modern leftists tell it, this was a horrible violation of the “rights” of these leftist motion picture professionals — to be fired or not hired for supporting a movement that had committed mass murder.
Compare that to the supposed offense of Rohini Sethi: Sethi said in response to the murders of Dallas police officers that “All lives matter.”
But this is typical hypocrisy of those on the Left. “The first amendment does not prevent people from receiving consequences for what they say, including workplace discipline,” asserted SGA President Shane Smith. To authoritarians such as Smith, freedom of speech means the freedom to parrot left-wing views.
A full removal of Sethi has significant hurdles, though. The student government constitution requires the student body president, president of the student senate and three-fourths of present student senators to approve impeachment proceedings. Sethi would then be tried by the student supreme court.
Instead of going through that arduous process, the student senate approved a measure giving SGA president Shane Smith exceptional one-time powers to punish Sethi as he saw fit. In response, Smith released a letter Friday outlining a set of five punishments for Sethi. The punishments include:
A 50-day suspension from SGA starting August 1. This suspension will be unpaid (she currently receives a stipend of about $700 a month).
A requirement to attend three “UH cultural events” each month from September through March, excluding December.
An order to write a “letter of reflection” about how her harmful actions have impacted SGA and the UH student body
An order to put on a public presentation Sept. 28 detailing “the knowledge she has gained about cultural issues facing our society.”
If Sethi refuses or fails any of the requirements, she will be kicked out of SGA entirely.
Smith notes in his letter that the punishment was particularly harsh because, in his view, Sethi hadn’t recognized the severity of her offense in declaring that all people’s lives matter.
Main Office: 415 Madison Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY 10017 USA Telephone No. (202) 279.0806 Email: Info@kmkhanlaw.com Direct Email: kmkhan@kmkhanlaw.com
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/robert-spencer-in-frontpage-khizr-khan-servant-of-the-global-umma SEE: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/; EXCERPT: But until now, it looked like the Khans were just Gold Star parents who the big bad Donald Trump attacked. It turns out, however, in addition to being Gold Star parents, the Khans are financially and legally tied deeply to the industry of Muslim migration–and to the government of Saudi Arabia and to the Clintons themselves. “Khan spent seven years, from 2000 to 2007, in the Washington, D.C., office of then-Hogan & Hartson,”The firm also handles Hillary Clinton’s taxes and is deeply connected with the email scandal. If that all isn’t enough, that same Hogan & Hartson law firm—now Hogan Lovells—employed Loretta Lynch, the current Attorney General of the United States. Khan’s own website for his own personal law firm KM Khan Law Office shows he represents clients in the business of buying visas to enter the United States. One of his specific areas of practice, according to the website, is “E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services.”Sen. Grassley listed out several of the “flaws” with the EB5 immigration program that Khan works in. That’s not to mention the fact that, according to Sen. Grassley, there have been serious national security violations in connection with the EB5 program that Khan works in and around already. In fact, the program—according to Grassley—was used by Middle Eastern operatives from Iran to attempt to illicitly enter the United States.
Published on Aug 1, 2016
Good evening, I’m still reporting on the invasion. Khizr Khan, the father of the fallen Muslim U.S. soldier who spoke at the Democratic National Convention, is an immigration attorney specializing in helping immigrants buy their way into the United States. Khan’s secret life is as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood whose purpose is to bring Sharia law to every nation on earth either by consent or conquest. According to the Daily Caller, Khan’s website shows he specializes in the E-2 and EB-5 programs, which provides U.S. green cards to foreigners who invest at least $500,000 into certain American businesses. As Jessica Vaughan, the policy director for the Center for Immigration Studies explained it to the Washington Examiner: “The E-2 and EB-5 programs are two of the most notoriously abused visa categories that essentially allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way to U.S. residency, and possibly citizenship, with a relatively modest investment.” Vaughan calls the EB-5 program a “citizenship for sale” program: “It’s an amazing deal. Compared to other countries, America is the Walmart of investor visa programs.” According to Walid Shoebat, a former jihadist whose mother was an American, and so was educated in Chicago. Khizr Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood agent working to bring pro-jihadi Muslims in to the United States for the express purpose of helping construct a plan to conquer the U.S. for Islam. “Saudi interests [are] using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia.… [Khan] has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well.” Adiebin is the wife of disgraced Congressman Anthony Weiner who resigned from Congress in 2011 due to a sexting scandal. “It is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin and family.” I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States
The Muslim who attacked Donald Trump, Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S.
But not so fast. Trump we have your back.
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. He specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries.
But more than this, Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia).Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).” A snapshot of his essay can be seen here:
But Khan’s fascination with Islam isn’t the only issue lest they say he was a “moderate Muslim”. What is more worrisome is that at the bottom of the intro, Khan shows his appreciation and the source of his work and gives credit to an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood:
“The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is gratefully acknowledged.”
This alone speaks volumes. Khan used the works of S. Ramadan to lay his foundation for his inspiration regarding the promotion of Sharia. S. Ramadan is Said Ramadan, head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major icon of the Muslim Brotherhood, the grandson of Hassan Al-Banna the founder and hero of the Muslim Brotherhood which spread terrorism throughout the world.
UPDATE: Due to too many American bickering for “more evidence” we read through Khan’s work (and will continue to post excerpts) to only find a treasure trove on how Khan describes Sharia. He denounces any modern reforms stating that Sharia is fixed. Firstly, it is obvious that Khan instructs Muslims to submit to Sharia:
In the same writing, Khan promotes the Al-Muwatta, the oldest book on Islamic law, written by Muwatta Imam Malik:
The Muwatta is full of references and exhortations to Islamic Jihad and martyrdom ideology. (See Source 1). Khan’s argument about Sharia is that it has no room for adjustment no “right” to have “new source of legislation”. “The Sunnah [Muhammad’s sayings]” according to Khan’s quoting from Islamic history that when it comes to law, a Muslim used the Quran and Sunnah to conclude:
“it vividly demonstrates that the structure of Islamic law–the Shari’ah–was completed during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad, in the Quran and theSunnah“.
He even refers to Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah (Political Documents, see Sources #2) regarding “Islam and politics” by Dr. M. Hamidullah which records 250 documents that includes Jihad in Islam amongst all other things that pertains to fundamental Shariah from an Islamist point of view. Any search on Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah from the Arabic would yield a library on violent Jihad and its promotion which Khan also promotes. This should shut up our critics, Khan’s work pegs that Sharia is fundamental, fixed, with little or no room for any wiggle. [END OF UPDATE]
All of this leads us to the source for Khan’s work, Khan’s icon and who Said Ramadan was.
Said Ramadan, Muslim Brotherhood agent
Ramadan was a writer who wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism. It is actually a Malaysian branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Khan’s fascination for Muslim Brotherhood icon and Islamic Sharia stems from Ramadan’s book Islamic Law: Its Scope and Equity, which Khan gleaned from to do his work giving credit to Ramadan. A version of it was published for the Malaysian Muslim Youth Movement (a branch of WAMY):
WAMY is the World Association of Muslim Youth which was created through the collaboration of the Wahhabist and Muslim Brotherhood led by Said Ramadan who was, again, the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton’s aid) and her parents Sayed Z. Abedin (father) and Saleha Mahmoud Abedin (mother). It was also financed by the wealthy Abdullah Omar Naseef, another boss of the Abedin family who was an Al-Qaeda financier.
Again, Khan wrote his Sharia Law supporting work in the eighties while he was in Saudi Arabia, the motherland of Wahhabism. This would never be possible unless Khan clearly had the support of the Saudi Wahhabist religious institution. We took a snapshot of the text:
While there is so much to glean from his work, time is of the essence, but Khan’s travel according to a recent report, he moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood. Currently he runs a law firm in New York City called KM Khan Law Office. According to the website, the the law firm specializes in “immigration services” to bring Muslims into the U.S., which presents a clash with Trump’s suggested policy to limit Muslim immigration into the U.S.
To understand the inception of Muslim immigration one must study the Muslim Minority Affairs, a paradigm and an Islamic jurisprudence created by Saudi Arabia which sparked during the times Khan lived in Saudi Arabia while collaborating with the Saudi kingdom.
Khan needs further study and analysis to see how his connect with Hillary Clinton’s campaign since he serves the interest of Muslim oil companies as well as Muslim immigration into the U.S. Intelius reveals Khizr M. Khan used to work for Hogan & Hartson and Lovells, which has ties to the Clinton Foundation:
“Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign”
“Many lawyers at Hogan Lovells remember the week in 2004 when U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan lost his life to a suicide bomber. Then-Hogan & Hartson attorneys mourned the death because the soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, a Muslim American immigrant, was among their beloved colleagues”
Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject which has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well. It will take hours of reading just to cover this topic on how it was The House of Saud’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” and the Abedins (Huma Abedin and family) that played a central role in using Muslim immigration to infiltrate the west with Wahhbi agenda. The House of Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work regarding the Muslim Minority Affairs in the West, published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the U.S. with Islam. It is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin and family (Sayed Z. Abedin) which we translated excerpts from his work.
In regards to his son and his sacrifice, on the other side of the coin, many were the ‘Muslim martyrs’ who joined the US military. Ali Abdul Saoud Mohamed, for example, enlisted in the Special Forces of the US Army; he was a double agent for Al-Qaeda. How about Hasan K. Akbar, a Muslim American soldier who murdered and injured fifteen soldiers. There was Bowe Bergdahl, an American Muslim soldier who deserted his men to join the Taliban, a desertion which led to six American being ambushed and killed while they were on the search looking for him. And of course the example of Nidal Malik Hassan, who murdered fourteen Americans in cold blood in Fort Hood. What about infiltration into the U.S. military like Taha Jaber Al-Alwani, a major Muslim thinker for theMuslim Minority Affairs, an icon of the Abedin family (Hillary’s aid Huma) who, while he served in U.S. military, called on arming Muslims to fight the U.S? Al-Alwani is an IMMA (Institute of Muslims Minority Affairs) favorite, Taha Jaber al-Alwani, whom Hillary’s aid Huma Abedin credit Al-Alwani as the source for their doctrine (it can’t get any better than this) also see Abedins-Mein-Kampf. Al-Alwani is an ardent anti-Semite who by the way, runs the United States Department of Defense program (out of all places) for training Muslim military chaplains in the U.S. military.
Alwani runs GSISS (Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences) GSISS is a United States Department of Defense program for training Muslim military chaplains. It was the GSISS that produced the United States Marine Corps’ first Muslim chaplain. Alawani even writes Nazi-style, anti-Semitic studies depicting Jews as the “Golden Calf” while condemning the United States: “…the Zionist leaders made this calf a model for today’s world so they can be able to control it. Today’s world with its secularism and its phony democracy and alongside its free and controlled trade and national legitimacy and all these other subjects that bellows…”
“… it [MMA, Muslim Minority Affairs] is a Jurisprudence for a group confned to its special circumstances which is allowed what others are not. Its exercise needs an understanding of social sciences, especially sociology, economics, political science and international relations… for the fundamentals of success for the Muslim Minority Jurisprudence it must adhere to the collective earth concept.” [link from Arabic here]
The movement is an “international relations” issue which means linking to politicians in the U.S. Alwani, a double agent, is a man commissioned by our government, even calls for a soon-to-be military conquest (literal Jihad) on U.S. soil and provides an offcial fatwa in preparation for the use of force against the U.S.:
“Commitment to the Quranic concept of Geography: The land belongs to Allah, his religion is Islam, and every country is already in the House of Islam—now in the present time—since they will be in the House of Islam by force in the near future. The whole of humanity is a Muslim Nation: it is either ‘the religion of the nation’ which has embraced this religion [Islam], or a ‘proselyte nation’ we are obliged to conquer.” (Alwani, The Jurisprudence of Muslim Minority Affairs. No. 7, translated from Arabic by Shoebat.com)
What part of “they will be in the House of Islam by force in the near future” don’t these democrats understand? Do the democrats want more dead Americans?
Even the Abedins’Journal for Muslim Minority Affairs(JMMA ) confrms that their program stems from these same extremist sources including the notoriousTaha Jaber Al-Alwanias well as the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood,Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradawi. Huma Abedin, Hillary’s aidwrote:
“The theory of the Jurisprudence of Muslim Minorities is most easily clarified by shedding light on its founders” which the notes state are none other than Muslim Brotherhood “Yusuf al-Qaradawi” and “Taha Jabir al-Alwani”.
In a nutshell, The Muslim Minority Affairs program is part of a grand plan to destroy America from within, exactly as what the Muslim Brotherhood planned, which was exposed in the HLF (Holy Land Foundation) trial.
I can go on and on. Muslims in general wanted a war in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan where Islamists clearly participated in such wars with U.S. aid since the time of Ronald Reagan. If Khan wanted his son’s life preserved he would avoid such wars and will stand with Trump, pure and simple, unless of course, the U.S. was clearing the runway for a greater cause, a cause we have seen brewing for decades which needs no evidence here on how Islamists do not mind collaborating with the U.S. To each his agenda.
These Muslim soldiers were “heroes” of course, until the snow melted later on. Is it likely that Khan’s son was killed before the snow melted? Only another type of investigation will determine that. Does Hillary’s man ever mention how many soldiers have died because of Muslim traitors? Do they ever bring up how many Christians in the US military were killed? Yet the modernists and homosexuals continue to attack Christians.
But soon everything we need to know will be uncovered as a Middle Eastern proverb says: the snow always melts and the sh*t under it will soon be revealed.
Source #1: Here are snapshots of Al-Muwatta, showing its jihadist exhortations:
Source #2
Excerpt from Khan’s recommendation to follow the 250 documents from Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah. In it, it states “What was said the proclamation on Jihad warfare amongst Islamist writers. Many Islamist too this subject. They spoke of Islamic conquests and the reason it spread and succeeded in lightening speed. What concern us are the reasons for declaring Jihad along the Islamic borders or in provinces where the enemy was crushed which expanded due to Jihad movement which included all fronts”
