OPRAH WINFREY DELIVERS "HARRY'S LAST LECTURE ON A MEANINGFUL LIFE" AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY~LACED WITH NEW AGE, UNIVERSALISM, & MYSTICISM

SPREADING THE FALSE GOSPEL 

OF THE ONE WORLD RELIGION:

WE ARE ALL INTERCONNECTED BY OUR OWN DIVINITY?

Published on Apr 28, 2015

Oprah Winfrey shared her vision for a meaning life with the Stanford community as the Rathbun Visiting Fellow for 2015. At the end of her daylong campus visit, she delivered "Harry's Last Lecture on a Meaningful Life." The annual address honors the late Stanford Law School Professor Harry Rathbun.

SEE OUR MANY POSTS ABOUT OPRAH WINFREY 

AND HER PAGAN PROPENSITIES

Letter to the Editor of Lighthouse Trails Research: www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com

I’m writing this because of Oprah Winfrey’s influence in areas most Christians would never suspect: in the top universities in the U.S.

Oprah agreed to be Stanford University’s Office of Religious Life’s “2015 Rathburn Visiting Fellow.”

See link:
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/march/rathbun-oprah-winfrey-031115.html

This is an honor bestowed by Stanford’s Office of Religious Studies. She not only has special access to Stanford students through this coming year of 2015, she also delivered the annual Stanford lecture on “A Meaningful Life” this past April 20 at Stanford Memorial Church (which is on Stanford’s campus).

Stanford’s Memorial Church holds 1,100 people. You may be surprised to hear that many Stanford students not only attended but lined up outside the church several hours before Oprah’s 7 pm speech, just to get good seats, and many clamored at the end of the 1 1/2 hour event to get a “selfie” with Ms. Oprah Winfrey herself.

Oprah talked for 1 hour, with a Q & A at the end.  Two highlights of her talk were:

1) Leading about 1000 Stanford students in a 5 minute meditation session (inhale, exhale, etc.) telling them to think of all the conscious choices they made up to this point, that determined their destiny, that led them to Stanford University.
2) Oprah: “I learned that I could control my life. You are the master of your fate . . . you are the captain of your soul. I took control and went to my space . . . My space . . . the universal energy . . . I tapped into that space of divine flow, where all beings, all things are connected. That space is real. You cannot have a meaningful life without having spiritual self-reflection. Know who you are and why you are here. When you tap into that space, divine flow, that universal energy, you become untouchable in what you are called to do.”

This is what Warren B. Smith has been warning about for many years, the universal lie that “We are all one, we are all interconnected. God is in everyone and everything.”  Oprah Winfrey was able to spread this lie to an attentive audience of young Stanford University students. See Lighthouse Trails Oprah articles and booklets: http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?cat=2595.

So glad you continue warning about Oprah Winfrey’s pervasive influence among evangelicals, as well as in the secular media, etc.

In Christ,
Concerned in California

Click here to watch Oprah Winfrey’s talk at Stanford University.

Related Articles:

Oprah Winfrey’s New Age “Christianity” and the Emperor’s New Clothes

Oprah Winfrey’s New Age “Christianity” (Part 2) – Neale Donald Walsch, “God,” and Hitler

An Insider’s View of Oprah’s Life You Want Weekend Tour 2014 With Rob Bell – Bringing Americans to the New Age “Christ”

MONICA LEWINSKY BLAMES INTERNET: "PUBLIC SHAMING AS A 'BLOOD SPORT' HAS TO STOP"~PROGRESSIVE COMPASSION & EMPATHY HER FIX~BUT WHAT ABOUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

LEWINSKY ACCUSES
A LIBERAL'S WORLDVIEW: 

VICTIMS OF SHAME, GOSSIP, SLANDER LIMITED TO WOMEN, MINORITIES 

& THE GAY COMMUNITY? 

ALL BECAUSE OF THE UNREGULATED INTERNET!
BEMOANS

"A CULTURE OF HUMILIATION" POPULATED BY LIBERALS THEMSELVES;
BILL CLINTON'S EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS 
SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXPOSED? 

Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton's Lover: 

The Price of Shame
LESSONS NOT LEARNED
17 YEARS & STILL A LIBERAL
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS ARE ABSOLUTE,
BUT ARE AT RISK IF THEY HAVE TO
PASS THROUGH HER FILTERS
NEEDLESSLY SUFFERED BECAUSE OF THE INTERNET'S OPENNESS?

A VICTIM MENTALITY PLACES BLAME ON GLOBAL HATE SPEECH 

FOR DAMAGING HER

Bill Clinton's 1998 Monica Lewinsky Testimony Complete

"THAT WOMAN"

AFTER THEY'VE ALREADY RECEIVED TONS OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT, FEDS EXEMPT TANK LIKE "MRAPS" FROM PROHIBITED POLICE EQUIPMENT

"FOR THE GREATER GOOD", NAZI STYLE

FEDS EXEMPT TANK LIKE "MRAPS" FROM PROHIBITED POLICE EQUIPMENT

DESPITE ADMITTING THEY’RE 

“MILITARISTIC IN NATURE”

Even some police are surprised 

by MRAP exemption

by Kit Daniels

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/feds-exempt-mraps-from-prohibited-police-equipment-despite-admitting-theyre-militaristic-in-nature/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Although Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles (MRAPs) are “militaristic in nature,” cops should use them because they have “significant utility for law enforcement operations,” according to President Obama’s task force on police equipment.

The interagency Law Enforcement Equipment Working Group (LEEWG), which was established by Obama under Executive Order 13688, purposely exempted MRAPs and other military vehicles from a list of equipment prohibited from police use.

To explain the exemption, LEEWG described MRAPs as equipment “that could be seen as militaristic in nature yet also may have significant utility for law enforcement operations.”

“This includes several types of armored vehicles, such as MRAP vehicles transferred via the [Pentagon’s] 1033 program and armored vehicles manufactured commercially,” the LEEWG report stated.

LEEWG even suggested that it was okay for university police departments to use MRAPs as long as they have “policies” in place, such as painting “Emergency Rescue” on the side, as if that’s going to prevent abuse from happening.

“The University of Texas System Police (UTSP) has a policy on Emergency Rescue Armored Personnel Vehicle (MRAP), which specifies that the ‘exclusive operational purpose’ of the MRAP is to enhance the physical protection of its occupants,” the LEEWG report said. “Accordingly, the policy requires that any MRAP vehicle display the words ‘Emergency Rescue,’ so that its purpose is clear to the community.”

The editor-in-chief of a major law enforcement web site, Doug Wyllie of PoliceOne.com, thought it was strange that MRAPs were exempted.

“Recall that the MRAP was purpose-built for the theater of war in Iraq and Afghanistan when our soldiers were being killed and maimed because the Humvees and M35/deuce-and-a-halfs were being shredded like wet cardboard,” he wrote. “The design of the MRAP is specific to answer the threat of an IED constructed from unexploded military ordinance.”

Last year the Spokane Co., Wash., Sheriff’s Dept. came under fire after a deputy claimed their MRAP was needed to deal with the threat posed by “constitutionalists.”

“I mean, we’ve got a lot of constitutionalists and a lot of people that stockpile weapons, lots of ammunition,” the deputy said. “They have weapons here locally.”

Considering how much the Obama administration hates the Second Amendment, is it really that surprising that they would encourage police to use MRAPs?

OBAMA'S HYPOCRITICAL LYING ABOUT "ASKING LOTTERY WINNERS" WHO DERIVED THEIR WEALTH BY CHANCE, INHERITANCE, THEFT, AND/OR THROUGH OTHERS' EFFORTS

$40,000,000 + FOR VACATIONS

USING TAXPAYERS' MONEY

FEELING CONVICTED ABOUT YOUR WEALTH YET?

TIME TO REPENT & LET GOVERNMENT TAKE MORE FOR THE POOR

LET OBAMA DECIDE WHO THE WINNERS ARE?

NOT ON YOUR LIFE!

OBAMA'S LYING LINGO

COUCHED IN PIOUS RHETORIC 

COMMON GROUND WITH SOCIALIST POPE FRANCIS

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/president-obamas-lying-lingo/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Thomas Sowell

In a recent panel discussion on poverty at Georgetown University, President Barack Obama gave another demonstration of his mastery of rhetoric — and disregard of reality.

One of the ways of fighting poverty, he proposed, was to “ask from society’s lottery winners” that they make a “modest investment” in government programs to help the poor.

Since free speech is guaranteed to everyone by the First Amendment to the Constitution, there is nothing to prevent anybody from asking anything from anybody else. But the federal government does not just “ask” for money. It takes the money it wants in taxes, usually before the people who have earned it see their paychecks.

Despite pious rhetoric on the left about “asking” the more fortunate for more money, the government does not “ask” anything. It seizes what it wants by force. If you don’t pay up, it can take not only your paycheck, it can seize your bank account, put a lien on your home and/or put you in federal prison.

So please don’t insult our intelligence by talking piously about “asking.”

And please don’t call the government’s pouring trillions of tax dollars down a bottomless pit “investment.” Remember the soaring words from Barack Obama, in his early days in the White House, about “investing in the industries of the future”? After Solyndra and other companies in which he “invested” the taxpayers’ money went bankrupt, we haven’t heard those soaring words so much.

Then there are those who produced the wealth that politicians want to grab. In Obama’s rhetoric, these producers are called “society’s lottery winners.”

Was Bill Gates a lottery winner? Or did he produce and sell a computer operating system that allows billions of people around the world to use computers, without knowing anything about the inner workings of this complex technology?

Was Henry Ford a lottery winner? Or did he revolutionize the production of automobiles, bringing the price down to the point where cars were no longer luxuries of the rich but vehicles that millions of ordinary people could afford, greatly expanding the scope of their lives?

Most people who want to redistribute wealth don’t want to talk about how that wealth was produced in the first place.

They just want “the rich” to pay their undefined “fair share” of taxes. This “fair share” must remain undefined because all it really means is “more.”

Once you have defined it — whether at 30 percent, 60 percent or 90 percent — you wouldn’t be able to come back for more.

Obama goes further than other income redistributionists. “You didn’t build that!” he declared to those who did. Why? Because those who created additions to the world’s wealth used government-built roads or other government-provided services to market their products.

And who paid for those roads and other government-provided services if not the taxpayers? Since all other taxpayers, as well as non-taxpayers, also use government facilities, why are those who created private wealth not to use them also, since they are taxpayers as well?

The fact that most of the rhetorical ploys used by Barack Obama and other redistributionists will not stand up under scrutiny means very little politically. After all, how many people who come out of our schools and colleges today are capable of critical scrutiny?

When all else fails, redistributionists can say, as Obama did at Georgetown University, that “coldhearted, free-market capitalist types” are people who “pretty much have more than you’ll ever be able to use and your family will ever be able to use,” so they should let the government take that extra money to help the poor.

Slippery use of the word “use” seems to confine it to personal consumption. The real question is whether the investment of wealth is likely to be done better by those who created that wealth in the first place or by politicians. The track record of politicians hardly suggests that turning ever more of a nation’s wealth over to them is likely to turn out well.

It certainly has not turned out well in the American economy under Barack Obama.

REP. LOUIE GOHMERT SUGGESTS FEDS USING JADE HELM TO “PROVOKE A FIGHT” WITH CITIZENS

REP. LOUIE GOHMERT SUGGESTS 

FEDS USING JADE HELM TO 

“PROVOKE A FIGHT” WITH CITIZENS

Congressman calls labeling of Texas & Utah 

as hostile states "suspicious"

by Paul Joseph Watson

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/rep-louie-gohmert-suggests-feds-using-jade-helm-to-provoke-a-fight-with-citizens/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Congressman Louie Gohmert has called for changes to the Jade Helm military exercise, arguing that the labeling of Texas and Utah as “hostile” states in Army documents related to the drill is “suspicious,” while suggesting that the federal government is trying to “provoke a fight” with citizens.

In a piece published by the Highland County Press, Gohmert, who is Vice Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, suggests that the Utah and Texas may have been labeled negatively because they are red states.

“Once I observed the map depicting “hostile,” “permissive” and “uncertain” states and locations, I was rather appalled that the hostile areas amazingly have a Republican majority and believe in the sanctity of the United States Constitution,” writes Gohmert.

“When the federal government begins, even in practice, games or exercises, to consider any U.S. city or state in “hostile” control and trying to retake it, the message becomes extremely calloused and suspicious.”

Gohmert says that when he was in the U.S. Army, areas of America were never dubbed “hostile” and that fictitious names were used in such instances. Such descriptions represent “an affront to the residents of that particular state considered as hostile, as if the government is trying to provoke a fight with them,” he writes.

The Congressman also makes it clear that he “understands” concerns that the exercises may be preparation for martial law-style scenarios, noting that the Obama administration has repeatedly expressed animosity towards constitutionalists, veterans and Christians.

“We have seen people working in this administration use their government positions to persecute people with conservative beliefs in God, country, and notions such as honor and self-reliance,” writes Gohmert.

The Congressman concludes his article by calling for major changes to Jade Helm before it commences on July 15.

“The map of the exercise needs to change, the names on the map need to change, and the tone of the exercise needs to be completely revamped so the federal government is not intentionally practicing war against its own states.”

In criticizing Jade Helm and indicating that he understands the concerns of residents, Gohmert is opening himself up to the same kind of media attacks that were launched against Texas Governor Greg Abbott after he announced that the Texas State Guard would monitor the drill.

_______________________________________________________________

Congressman Exposes DHS Buildup for CIVIL UNREST & Secret Police Force NOT A CONSPIRACY

PUBLIC SCHOOL ABUSE: "ICE-O-LATION": SOLITARY CONFINEMENT "IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION" (ISS) IN A FRIGID FOCUS ROOM WITH NO FOOD, WATER, OR TOILET~OTHER INSTANCES OF CONCENTRATION CAMP STYLE METHODS

SCHOOL SPARKS OUTRAGE AFTER ISOLATING STUDENT IN FRIGID SOLITARY CONFINEMENT

“I asked if I could get my jacket and was told no”

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/school-sparks-outrage-after-isolating-student-in-frigid-solitary-confinement/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A school in Texas has defended its use of a frigid “focus room” where one child claims to have been isolated for more than two days.

Parents Lillian Borjas and Trevor Snowden were disturbed to discover the punishment being meted out to their child at the Carl Schurz Elementary School in New Braunfels.

A blog post entitled The “Focus Room” Horror first published details last week regarding 9-year-old Alex’s claims, accompanied by photos taken by the boy’s mother of Alex sitting in the corner of the room with his hands tucked inside his shirt.

Alex’s mother says she was denied access to the room four or five times before the school’s vice principal escorted her to see her son.

“Immediately Alex’s mom pulled out her phone and started taking pictures as the vice principal tried to block her,” the blog states, adding the mother was also unable to re-enter the room in order to photograph the thermostat.

Photos show the young boy huddled in the corner of a small room, in addition to a “hastily drawn” circle in the middle of the floor where Alex was reportedly ordered to sit for an hour and a half in order to earn classroom minutes.

Alex told his parents the room is “where bad children go and serve their in-school suspension (ISS).”

Asked how often he’d been subjected to the room, Alex responded, “Almost every day, once for two straight days.”

“I asked if I could get my jacket and was told no,” Alex said.

Meanwhile, “the teach [sic] put her own jacket on and said ‘It’s sure nice to be warm,’” Alex claims.

The boy went on to assert he’s not allowed snacks, bathroom breaks or exercise when in isolation.

“If you have a son or daughter attending Carl Schurz Elementary I strongly encourage asking your child about the ‘Focus Room’,”the blog’s author cautioned, adding “go to the school and ask to see it for yourself, insist on it.”

“Isolated, cold, confined to a circle drawn on a floor of a featureless room. Think about that for minute. Who else deploys such tactics? And under what circumstances?”

Admittedly, Alex’s parents confirm he sometimes acts out, and that he was recently diagnosed by a pediatrician as having ADHD, which would make it difficult for him to sit still inside of the circle.

The district defended its use of the space, highlighting the difference between a “focus room” and “safe rooms,” which are used during emergencies.

“A ‘FOCUS Room’ is a classroom environment that allows for behavior intervention such as social skills and counseling,” the district expressed in a letter.

“What it is, is a space that the child can focus their energy,” a spokesperson for the New Braunfels Independent School District explained, professing, “You’ll find it in any school district, in any school in the state.”

On Friday, the Texas Education Agency lodged a complaint against the district alleging faculty may have violated the Texas Education Code, namely a provision prohibiting educators from confining special needs children to secluded areas “contain[ing] less than 50 square feet of space.”

As for the temperature of the room, school officials noted, “It’s set district-wide at a certain temperature. There was no intentional way to keep that child cold in that room.”

The boy’s parents declared this is the last year Alex will be attending public school.

“He will be home schooled,” Borjas told KXAN.

______________________________________________________________

VIDEO: 

SOLITARY CONFINEMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE 2012:

FCC COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI WARNS OF FEDERAL REGULATION OF ONLINE SPEECH

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2014/02/federal-communications-commission.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/02/fcc-department-of-internetajit-pai-of.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/02/net-neutrality-ajit-pai-fcc.html

FCC COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI WARNS OF FEDERAL REGULATION OF ONLINE SPEECH

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/20896-fcc-commissioner-warns-of-federal-regulation-of-online-speech; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

"With the Obama administration-backed “net neutrality” takeover of Internet infrastructure paving the way, federal bureaucrats may seek to regulate the content of websites such as the Drudge Report. That is the warning of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Ajit Pai, who cautioned in various interviews and talks this month that another Washington, D.C., bureaucracy — the Federal Election Commission — needs to be watched closely lest the government “impulse” to regulate online speech be acted upon. The United Nations and various UN member regimes hope to censor and tax the Internet, too.

FCC Commissioner Pai, one of two Republicans on the five-member commission, was also an outspoken opponent of his bureaucracy’s Internet takeover earlier this year under the guise of “net neutrality.” The Obama-backed plan seeks to regulate the architecture of the World Wide Web as a “public utility,” supposedly to keep it “neutral” and prevent Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from using different business models that might speed up the delivery of certain content over that of other sites. But that may be just the proverbial camel’s nose under the tent vis-à-vis government regulation of the Internet, Pai warned.

“I could easily see this migrating over to the direction of content,” he explained in during a panel discussion at the “Right Online” conference earlier this month. “What you’re seeing now is an impulse not just to regulate the roads over which traffic goes, but the traffic itself…. It is conceivable to me to see the government saying, ‘We think the Drudge Report is having a disproportionate effect on our political discourse. He doesn’t have to file anything with the FEC. The FCC doesn’t have the ability to regulate anything he says, and we want to start tamping down on websites like that.’”

Pai also said he did not think it was “unthinkable” that some government bureaucracy would consider the marketplace of ideas to be “too fraught with dissonance” — that media outlets ranging from Drudge to Fox News and everything in between would be seen as “playing unfairly” in the online “political speech sandbox.” The First Amendment is more than just words in the Constittion, it is “an ongoing cultural commitment,” he added. “And I sense that among a substantial number of Americans and a disturbing number of regulators here in Washington that online speech is [considered] a dangerous brave new world that needs to be regulated.”    

The FCC commissioner reiterated his warnings last week on Fox News Radio’s The Alan Colmes Show. Among other concerns, Pai warned that the federal government’s “net neutrality” takeover of the Internet’s infrastructure could be a mere sneak preview of D.C. efforts to regulate content on media powerhouses such as the Drudge Report. “It’s not so much the FCC that I’m worried about in terms of online content regulation,” he said. “But what we do see is that at places like the Federal Elections Commission there is a regulatory impulse to regulate what heretofore has been a pretty open marketplace of ideas.”

“Net neutrality would insert government jurisdiction over the infrastructure of the internet and in time, other agencies might try to regulate the content,” added Pai, a leading critic of the Obama-backed “net neutrality” scheme, who said he had suffered from harassment and threats after speaking out. “If you look at what some of these agencies are thinking about doing right now — last year, for example, at the Federal Elections Commission, three regulators suggested that they did want to consider online content, like the Drudge Report, potentially as an in-kind contribution given that it had an impact on political campaigns.”  

The notion that the FEC, under the guise of regulating elections, might seek to regulate the political speech found online is hardly far-fetched. In fact, last year, a top Democrat on the commission, FEC Vice-Chair Ann Ravel, openly advocated a new regulatory regime to control online campaigning. “A reexamination of the commission’s approach to the Internet and other emerging technologies is long overdue,” she claimed following a battle over whether two anti-Obama YouTube videos in Ohio were a violation of existing FEC decrees.

Seeing through the call, the Republican FEC chairman, Lee Goodman, warned that Democrats on the commission were targeting online political sites and even media outlets such as the Drudge Report for regulation. “I told you this was coming,” he told the Washington Examiner, adding that if regulations could be extended in accordance with Democrat wishes, anyone writing a political blog, running a news site, or even a chat room could face stifling FEC regulation on speech. Goodman had already warned that Democrat commissioners were targeting conservative Internet sites before that.       

If it materializes, FEC regulation of online political speech could smother First Amendment protections for some of the unalienable rights outlined therein: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and more. Among other attacks, FEC bureaucrats could force even small-time bloggers and other activists who might be involved in writing about elections or candidates to obey a never-ending deluge of federal regulations. For a major operation, that might not be the end — they could afford armies of attorneys to sort through it. But for a smaller outfit, filling out mountains of paperwork and being forced to obey incomprehensible mountains of decrees could prove fatal. And maybe that is the point.    

Of course, the FEC, FCC, and other U.S. bureaucracies are hardly the only threat to Internet freedom. The United Nations and many of its myriad autocratic member regimes are also busy plotting an Internet takeover, as The New American has been reporting for years. As if to justify concerns over escalating UN attacks against online free speech, the bureaucracy leading the charge for global regulation, the UN International Telecommunication Union (ITU), recently installed as chief a Communist Chinese operative from mainland China who believes censorship is all in the eye of the beholder.  

“We [at the ITU] don’t have a common interpretation of what censorship means,” the recently installed secretary general of the UN agency, Houlin Zhao, was quoted as saying by the Korean Yonhap news agency last year. “A country can ask people not to watch pornography, and some consider this as also kind of censorship. We have not got a common definition.” When asked about the Communist Chinese dictatorship’s massive censorship regime targeting dissent, dissidents, and ideas it disagrees with, Zhao was evasive. “Some kind of censorship may not be strange to other countries,” he responded.

The brutal dictatorship in Beijing is hardly alone, and in fact, the Obama administration has been accused of tacitly aiding and abetting the UN’s bid for a greater role in overseeing the Internet, along with a coalition of establishment-minded “stakeholders” and foreign governments. More than a few experts have spoken out on the subject, including UN designs on extorting global Internet taxes from humanity to fund further UN plotting. “Should the U.N. end up in charge, it would have a chokehold on the global economy and a vast stream of revenue that would make it even more unaccountable than it already is,” warned financial economics Professor Karl Borden at the University of Nebraska.

From Washington D.C. and UN headquarters in New York to Moscow, Beijing, and everywhere in between, totalitarian-minded forces are up in arms about the free and open Internet — essentially the final bastion of real free speech and a truly free press, and potentially a crucial tool in freeing humanity from government tyranny. Among other concerns, the World Wide Web has facilitated a massive increase in public understanding surrounding the goals of those same totalitarian-minded forces — hence their efforts to control, regulate, censor, and tax it.

For the sake of humanity and especially liberty, Americans must resist any and all efforts to infringe on Internet freedom. Without it, free speech and much more may become a thing of the past."   

Related articles:

Chinese Communist to Lead UN Agency Seeking to Control Internet

Net Neutrality: Beginning of the End of the Internet?

E-mails Show Collusion Between IRS and FEC to Target Conservatives

UN Seeks to Criminalize Free Speech, Citing “Human Rights”

Senate Dems Take Aim at First Amendment

McCain-Feingold and Free Speech

UN May Tax and Censor Post-U.S. Internet, Experts Warn

Who Will Control Your Internet?

UN October Summit Reopens Grab for Global Internet Control

Internet “Governance” Summit in Brazil Advances UN Control

UN, Islamists & Communists Push Global Internet Regime

UN Bid to Seize Internet Fails but Threat Remains

After UN Internet Grab Fails, China Seeks to End Online Anonymity

UN Using Propaganda to Defend Proposed Internet Regime

_______________________________________________________________

FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai: Defund Us Please!

Net Neutrality Update Feds May Go after Drudge & Alternative Media:

CPAC 2015 - Hands Off My Wi-Fi!!! The Politicization of Internet Access

SECRETIVE GLOBALISTS BILDERBERG 2015 IN AUSTRIA WILL BE LIKE NONE BEFORE IT~COBRA ANTI-TERRORIST SECURITY FORCES

COBRA FORCES TO GUARD THE ELITE

BILDERBERG 2015 IN AUSTRIA WILL BE LIKE NONE BEFORE IT

The annual Bilderberg meeting is set to take place in Austria this June 2015

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-2015-in-austria-will-be-like-none-before-it/

Cobra To Provide Security at Bilderberg 2015

COBRA

M270 MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEMS FOUND IN TEXAS~TANKS ON FLAT BED RAILROAD CARS IN ALABAMA

TWELVE ROCKETS CAN BE FIRED 

FROM THIS VEHICLE WITH TANK TREADS;

ARE WE THE TARGETS?

Published on May 12, 2015

www.undergroundworldnews.com
We now have a confirmation on what the military equipment spotted in Texas Is. It Turns Out, They are M270 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems that have seen action in places like Iraq, Afghanistan and Other War Fronts. The question now is, Who do they belong to and what do they plan to do with them.
Original Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZvM8...

http://data3.primeportal.net/artiller...

http://photo.armorsite.net/wp-content...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M270_Mul...

Alabama: Train Hauling Military Equipment Seen Heading West In Birmingham, Alabama

Published on May 13, 2015

www.undergroundworldnews.com
I want to give a shout out to Daniel. He has witnessed lots of activity in his neck of the woods here recently. He said there was a non stop uptick for 2 days straight, and then he spotted this. The train was said to be headed West of Birmingham, Alabama. He has also just messaged that he has footage of Choppers flying LOW Over Him Today, Ill post once i get all the material.
For those out there seeing this, share it! the rest of the country needs to see that there is a Lot of Military Movement going on Right Now in This Country ahead of Jade Helm 15.
www.undergroundworldnews.com