EXPOSING JADE HELM 15: ARMY & PENTAGON PROMULGATE DISINFORMATION (LIES) USING MAIN STREAM MEDIA ACCOMPLICES; BRAND INFOWARS & OTHERS AS "FAR RIGHT FRINGE"

ARMY & PENTAGON NAME CALLING:

"FAR RIGHT FRINGE CONSPIRACY THEORIST" ALTERNATIVE MEDIA MALIGNED AS UNTRUTHFUL, MISLEADING, LUDICROUS, BIZARRE

CONDITIONING US TO THE NEW NORMAL; 
ARE YOU DESENSITIZED YET?

JUST LIKE DENYING BLACKHAWK HELICOPTERS FLY LOW OVER POPULATED AREAS WHEN YOU SEE THEM WITH YOUR OWN EYES FLYING AT UNDER 500 FEET, 

RATTLING YOUR WINDOWS, CHINA, TV OR COMPUTER,

DISTURBING YOUR SLEEP, TERRIFYING YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN

MSM Caught Lying: Breaking Jade Helm Update:

Published on Mar 27, 2015

Retired Staff Sergeant Joe Biggs breaks down the current crop of talking points and outright lies by the Pentagon and Main Stream Media as they attempt to discredit and smear infowars.com. They label Alex Jones and Joe Biggs as extremist conspiracy theorists even though time after time we put out reports that are sourced with army documents and testimony from vets that know of the plans to disarm Americans.
http://www.infowars.com/beyond-denial...
http://www.infowars.com/entire-federa...

THE PROOF: ARMY DOCUMENTS HAVE NEVER BEEN SECRET;

SGT. JOE BIGGS, PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT, EXPOSES THE FACTS:

MOST RECENT PUBLIC (NOT SECRET) DOCUMENT RIGHT HERE, 

JUST ONE OF MORE PUBLIC DISCLOSURES:

http://wtaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/BrCoComm021015ArmySpecialOpsCommand.pdf?49be78

"Military Drill Identifying “Hostile” U.S. States Sparks Alarm"

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/20540-military-drill-identifying-hostile-u-s-states-sparks-alarm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

by Alex Newman, March 27, 2015:

A massive U.S. military drill dubbed “Jade Helm 15” lists Texas, Utah, and part of California as “hostile” or “insurgent pocket” territory. The unclassified information about this drill is causing widespread alarm nationwide, with more than a few analysts suggesting it may be some sort of exercise practicing to impose martial law on Americans fed up with an out-of-control federal government. During the exercises, which will take place over the summer, Special Forces from various branches of the military will work with local law-enforcement in scenarios that, to critics at least, sound suspiciously like they are aimed at subduing rebellious American civilians and states amid a civil war or large-scale unrest. The federal government issued a response dismissing the concerns and saying that the training is to help U.S. forces prepare for overseas missions, but not everyone is convinced.

The most alarming components of the drills highlighted by concerned citizens and media commentators surround an unclassified presentation about Jade Helm 15’s “realistic military training” that was apparently leaked. In a graphic showing the territory across which the training will take place — essentially the American Southwest — different states are colored based on the fictional status of their loyalty to Washington. Colorado, Nevada, and most of California, for example, are dark blue, indicating that they are “permissive.” Utah and Texas are both shaded red, indicating that they are “hostile.” Southern California is also red, with a note reading “insurgent pocket.” Arizona is light blue, which in the legend is listed as “uncertain (leaning friendly),” while New Mexico is brown, or “uncertain (leaning hostile).” Two more states, Florida and Louisiana, have reportedly been added to the exercise.

According to the presentation, the eight-week training program involves Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces Command (Green Berets), Air Force Special Operations Command, Marine Special Operations Command, Marine Expeditionary Units, the 82nd Airborne Division, and unspecified “interagency partners.” Underneath the logo for the Jade Helm drills, a sword with two arrows crossing it, it reads: “Master the Human Domain.” What exactly that means was not clear, but at least some critics of the exercise have suggested it may be a euphemism for subjugating the population of the United States. Indeed, as other analysts have noted, citing available information, the drill almost certainly has nothing to do with defending the Southern border from invasion. The few details that have been provided, though, are causing concern among analysts.  

On a slide explaining “what to expect” during the two-month training program for “unconventional warfare,” the document warns of “increased aircraft in the area at night,” possible noise complaints, personnel carrying weapons with blank ammo, and more. Especially alarming to critics of the program is that “some individuals may conduct suspicious activities designed to prepare them for complex environments overseas,” and that “some participants will be wearing civilian attire and driving civilian vehicles.” Separately, a slide describing what “realistic military training” means has also raised alarm. The document mentions that it will be conducted “outside of federally owned property” and that it is designed to “ensure proper coordination between DOD representatives and local and regional authorities.” News reports citing military officials said the DEA, FBI, and the “Joint Personnel Recovery Agency” (JPRA) would also be participating.  

Citing other recently leaked U.S. military documents such as “FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations” about interning American civilians in camps, using “psyops” (psychological operations) on those detainees to affect their views, and more, David Hodges with the Common Sense Show said the drill is “undoubtedly the most frightening thing to occur on American soil since the Civil War.” In a widely re-published article about the training program, he said it could be “conclusively stated” that the drill was really about “preparing for a Red, White and Blue invasion.” “This is a massive rehearsal for martial law implementation as well as implementing the proverbial and much rumored Red and Blue List and the ‘snatch and grab’ extractions of key resistance figures from the Independent Media as well as uncooperative political figures,” Hodges added. “The various provisions of Jade Helm make it clear just how dangerous this drill truly is.”  

Responding to widely expressed concerns that the scheme is “preparation for imposing martial law or subduing right-leaning groups and individuals,” as the military publication Stars and Stripes put it, U.S. Army Special Operations Command denied the accusation. “That notion was proposed by a few individuals who are unfamiliar with how and why USASOC conducts training exercises,” USASOC spokesman Army Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria was quoted as saying. “This exercise is routine training to maintain a high level of readiness for Army Special Operations Forces because they must be ready to support potential missions anywhere in the world on a moment’s notice.” He re-iterated those comments in other interviews as well. Despite being referred to as “routine,” it was not clear whether any similar drill identifying U.S. states as “hostile” had ever taken place — except perhaps amid the Civil War.

In comments quoted by the Houston Chronicle, which made its bias obvious in the first sentence by claiming that the drills had “stirred some ultra-right-wing fears of a government takeover in the Lone Star State,” local law enforcement officials also shed some light on what to expect. “They're going to set up cells of people and test how well they're able to move around without getting too noticed in the community,” Chief Deputy Roy Boyd with the Victoria County Sheriff's Office was quoted as saying by the paper. “They're testing their abilities to basically blend in with the local environment and not stand out and blow their cover.” A former Army Intelligence officer was also quoted downplaying fears about the drill and suggesting that it was largely routine training. 

Separately, the Chronicle attempted to belittle concerns expressed by critics about the program. National radio host Alex Jones, for example — whose audience dwarfs the readership and listenership of many “mainstream” outlets, including the Chronicle — was introduced as part of the “far-right fringe” movement. Jones’ radio show and online portal Infowars played a key role in raising awareness about the drills under the headline “Feds Preparing to Invade Texas, List State as Hostile.” The supposed “journalist” at the Chronicle, apparently unable to contain himself or conceal his extreme bias, went on to describe the website Freedom Outpost, which also raised concerns about the drill and suggested it was practice for domestic martial law, as “ultra-libertarian.”

While local authorities quoted in news reports were aware of the programs and vowed to work with the community to prevent panic or paranoia, it would not be the first time that the Pentagon has alarmed U.S. civilians with its drills. In 2013, a series of “urban warfare” military exercises in major cities including Miami and Houston involving gun fire and black helicopters terrified locals who were unaware of what was going on. As The New American has also reported in recent years, under the Obama administration, military authorities have taken the unprecedented step of bringing troops from Communist China and Russia to do “training drills” with American forces. Other foreign militaries, primarily European, have for decades been practicing citizen disarmament and other drills on U.S. soil, as documented on video by Alex Jones.

Considering the fact that two-thirds of the American people in polls say the federal government is “out of control” and a "threat" to liberty, it is hardly surprising that many citizens do not trust the Obama administration when it performs military drills with law enforcement that it has been militarizing and attempting to nationalize — especially while identifying conservative states as “hostile” enemies. Obama’s invitation of foreign troops loyal to hostile regimes for military training drills in the United States certainly did not help matters. Nor does the fact that the current commander in chief began his political career in the living room of communist terrorist leader Bill Ayers — a man whose terror spree was backed by the Soviet puppet regime of Fidel Castro when it bombed the Pentagon and murdered police officers. Ayers’ terror group, the Weather Underground, planned to exterminate 25 million Americans in camps across the Southwest after taking over, according to FBI agent Larry Grathwohl who infiltrated the organization. “They were dead serious,” Grathwohl said in an video-taped interview.

Of course, the federal government’s recent behavior — ranging from Homeland Security stockpiling massive amounts of hollow-point ammunition to the multiple agencies producing propaganda demonizing U.S. military veterans, Christians, and Americans with mainstream political views as potential terrorists — is also unlikely to inspire trust. In fact, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia warned just last year that “you are kidding yourself” if you do not think mass internment of U.S. citizens, as happened with Japanese-Americans during World War II, would eventually return to this country.  

Jade Helm drill may well just be nothing more than training U.S. forces for “overseas missions,” as officials claim. However, considering the known details of the exercise and the accelerating anti-constitutional lawlessness of the federal government, it is hardly unreasonable to express concerns. In fact, anybody who is not concerned by the current state of U.S. affairs is simply not paying attention.

_________________________________________________________________________

Fox Whitewashes Jade Helm Exercise:

Published on Mar 28, 2015

Fox whitewashes the Jade Helm military exercise while refusing to identify Alex Jones or Infowars by name.
http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-cove...

Beyond Denial: Preparations For Martial law In America:

Published on Mar 28, 2015

The establishment media’s reaction to the upcoming Jade Helm military exercise has characterized concerns about the drill as being founded in nothing more than “right-wing paranoia,” but the exhaustive history of how the federal government and the U.S. Army have made preparations for martial law in America is beyond denial. The federal government and the U.S. Army have been readying for domestic unrest for decades, and preparations are accelerating exponentially.

http://www.infowars.com/beyond-denial...

..this story gone viral
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...

...fox new whitewashes
http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-cove...

...the "truth" behind
http://www.mintpressnews.com/the-trut...

Jade Helm! Night Time Military Training Black Hawk Helicopters over Coral Springs, Florida:
(These Low & Noisy Night Flights Having Been Done Routinely Over Delaware For The Last Two Years; They Claim They Are Flying at 1500 Feet Altitude-NO WAY!)

Published on Mar 27, 2015

PLEASE SHARE & CREDIT THE ORIGINAL VIDEO by PHOTOGRAPHER, ALI GAUDIOSI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iHNq...
Is Jade Helm already in Florida?! Please post your thoughts

"March 23, 2015 I was shaken by the loud rumbling of 4 Black Helicopters flying over my neighborhood for about 2 hours. I was unnerved by this, because this has never happened before in my quiet & peaceful city. I did a little searching on twitter, and was notified by Coral Springs City Commissioner, Dan Daley that this was a scheduled military training operation.

March 24, 2015 around 8:20pm I heard the helicopters flying over my house again, and I found it odd, so I grabbed my phone and waited for them to pass over again so I catch them on video. As you can see in the first iPhone video, it was extremely dark outside, so I decided to film it with my Canon 5D MKIII, but had to crank the ISO up as far as it could go, 12800. This went on until around 10:00pm.

According to a vague article on Coral Springs Talk, a community news website, this will be going on for the next 2 weeks.
http://coralspringstalk.com/police-tr...
http://www.wsvn.com/story/28539409/mi...

ENTIRE FEDERAL MARTIAL LAW PLAN EXPOSED

Alex Jones responds to MSM attacks on purpose of Jade Helm exercise

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/entire-federal-martial-law-plan-exposed/

Jade Helm 15 Update: White U.N. Trucks, Mock Arrests, Sea Invasion & Black Hawk Choppers:

ACLU DELAWARE SUES RED CLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR RIGGING ITS TAX REFERENDUM, BRIBING VOTERS, BLOCKING POLLS

ACLU DELAWARE SUES RED CLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR RIGGING ITS REFERENDUM

SEE: http://www.wdel.com/story.php?id=67183; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

by Amy Cherry, March 27, 2015:

The American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware (ACLU) has filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Red Clay Consolidated School District over its referendum last month.

The complaint alleges Red Clay used its governmental power to skew election results in favor of the tax increase. 

According to the complaint, Red Clay scheduled family fun nights to sway voters.

"They scheduled other family events so to make sure that parents of school children who they considered more likely to vote for the tax increase would be at the school, which is also the polling place, on the day of the referendum," alleged Kathleen Macrae, Executive Director of the ACLU of Delaware. 

Pati Nash, spokeswoman for Red Clay, said the district did host those events, but would have no way of knowing how those attending would vote.

"They were not done with as asserted (in the complaint) designed only to get the vote out that would most likely support the tax increase or to, in anyway, knowingly dissuade anyone from voting," said Nash. 

The complaint also alleges that empty school buses were parked to block handicap parking spots and even gave away free pizza to students after their parents voted. 

"It limited access for other people, especially elderly people or people that had mobility problems to be able to get to the polls and vote against the tax increase if that's what they wanted to do," said Macrae.

Nash said that's simply not true.

"There were some buses at Marbrook (Elementary School) in the afternoon to pick up children, who had after school activities, but they were never parked in front of the handicapped spots, she said. "I've been told they were parked in the circle in front of the school." 

Nash said the district following the guidelines from the Board of Elections.

"We put on a fair campaign," said Nash. 

The complaint also named the Board of Elections for New Castle County, which certified the election results after state Senator Karen Peterson called for an investigation intoallegations of voter fraud.

"They were well aware that there were many complaints filed about the way the election was handled yet they went ahead and certified the results anyway," said Macrae.

"We just received the complaint and haven't had a chance to review it with the Department of Justice," said Anthony Albence, Director of the Board of Elections for New Castle County.

Peterson told WDEL that a few instances of fraud had been identified, but they would not have been enough to sway the outcome of the referendum. 

The referendum passed by 880 votes on Feb. 24.

The ACLU wants the Chancery Court to nullify the results of the referendum and ask that a new referendum be held.

Macrae said the complaint is not about whether the tax increase should go forward. 

"We're bringing this suit because voting is a fundamental value of our democracy, and we cannot allow government, including school districts, to use their power to rig an election," Macrae said. 

Contact Amy Cherry at acherry@wdel.com or follow her on Twitter at @acherry13.

_____________________________________________________________________

ALSO SEE:

http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2015/03/27/aclu-red-clay-tax-vote-invalidated/70551546/;

EXCERPT:

"The ACLU filed this complaint because, above all else, every voter must be given fair and equal access to the ballot box. That is a fundamental value of our democracy," said Kathleen MacRae, the group's executive director, in a news release. "This complaint has nothing to do with the results of the referendum. It has everything to do with process. Government, including school districts, cannot use their power to rig elections in violation of state and federal law."

Sen. Karen Peterson asked the board not to affirm the vote totals, presenting 35 emails from constituents reporting problems. Peterson said constituents reported schools sending students older than 18 to vote during class time and schools placing signs in their buildings urging "yes votes."

"This was illegal electioneering," Peterson said. "In these elections, the schools are bound by the same rules that political candidates are. This would be like me going into a polling place on Election Day and placing signs saying, 'Vote for Karen Peterson,' and giving pizza to people who voted."

_________________________________________________

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/01/ten-common-core-promoters-laughing-all.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/02/delawares-red-clay-school-district.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/03/delaware-fraud-red-clay-sd-referendum.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/03/red-clay-voter-fraud-misuse-of-funds.html

NATIONAL BIOMETRIC ID FOR AMERICANS~"TO STOP ILLEGALS FROM GETTING JOBS"~THE TRADE OFF: ALL YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION GOES TO A MASSIVE FEDERAL DATABASE WHICH DETERMINES IF YOU ARE ALLOWED TO WORK

"Congress Pushes Obama-Backed National Biometric ID For Americans"

MAKING AMERICAN WORKERS INTO SLAVES OF THE STATE SO POLITICIANS CAN AVOID DEALING WITH THE BORDER COLLAPSE, OBAMA'S AMNESTY, ILLEGALS OBTAINING FREE GOVERNMENT BENEFITS, AND OBAMA'S ILLEGAL EXECUTIVE ORDERS

TOUTED BY ALLEGED REPUBLICANS AS: 

"THE EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY SYSTEM OF THE 21ST CENTURY" 

by Alex Newman

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/20531-congress-pushes-obama-backed-national-biometric-id-for-americans; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

After largely failing to prod state governments into developing a national identification system known as “REAL ID,” Republican lawmakers in Congress are once again pushing an Obama-backed scheme that would force every American to have a national ID card containing sensitive biometric data. The controversial plan, embedded in an immigration-enforcement bill, has been in the works for years, but has consistently been met with stiff opposition from liberty-minded grassroots organizations and activists. While the plan has failed in previous Congresses thanks to a groundswell of opposition, critics of the measure say that without prompt action, the unconstitutional scheme could soon become a reality.

The legislation, officially dubbed the "Legal Workforce Act" (H.R. 1147), is ostensibly aimed at preventing illegal immigrants from obtaining jobs in the United States. Among the most troubling elements highlighted by critics, though, is that the bill would purport to mandate a national ID card for every American as a condition of working. It would also force every employer in America to purchase and use so-called “E-Verify technology” to check with Washington, D.C., as to whether potential employees have government permission to work. Finally, it would create a massive federal database containing sensitive data on virtually every person in the country — a database that could easily be expanded to include even more information.

While establishment lawmakers on both sides of the aisle seem fond of the measure, critics are sounding the alarm about the bill and its implications for liberty. In an e-mail to supporters urging them to help crush the unconstitutional legislation, for example, former Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas), in his capacity as chairman of Campaign for Liberty, warned that the national ID scheme would be a nightmare. Among other concerns, the two-time GOP presidential contender noted that it would allow federal bureaucrats to include biometric information — potentially including fingerprints, retinal scans, and more — that could and likely would be eventually used as a tracking device. It would also make it illegal for anyone to work in the United States without obtaining the national ID.

“Every time any citizen applies for a job, the government would know — and you can bet its only a matter of time until 'ID scans' will be required to make even routine purchases, as well,” Dr. Paul warned, adding that “statists in both parties have been fighting to ram their radical national ID-database scheme into law” for years. “In fact, this scheme was a key portion of the infamous so-called 'Comprehensive Immigration Reform' bills both parties have tried to ram through.” Now, Paul said, the statists believe they have found a way to impose their national ID: Drop the amnesty provisions and focus on immigration “security.”

According to Dr. Paul, a constitutionalist who served in Congress for more than 20 years, the term “security” is being used as “nothing more than a buzzword meant to trick Americans from all over the country into thinking that Congress is finally going to seal our southern border.” In reality, though, it means something much different. “The 'security' members of both parties in the U.S. House want doesn't target any U.S. border,” Paul added. “Instead, it's meant to create an all-out police state within them.”

Paul also warned that the national database required for the ID regime could easily expand to include information on gun ownership, medical records, political affiliation, and “virtually anything else at the stroke of a President's pen.” In fact, the stakes are so high, he said, that this type of battle is often decisive in “whether a country remains free or continues sliding toward tyranny.” Existing abuses such as lawless NSA spying, IRS harassment, and more offer further evidence that the feds cannot be trusted with such Orwellian tools to track, monitor, and ultimately control Americans.     

Despite the dangers, the legislation has already been passed out of the House Judiciary Committee, getting a vote just three days after it was introduced — and the markup took place before the text of the bill was even available online. “The speed with which this bill was rushed through Committee means the House leadership is very serious about passing this bill into law as soon as possible,” warned Paul, urging Americans to fight back immediately to prevent the bill from passing. He also warned about potential “bipartisan compromises” that could be even worse than the original.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who has a dismal 54 percent in the Freedom Index, a tool provided by this magazine that scores lawmakers' votes based on adherence to the U.S. Constitution they all swore to uphold. The controversial bill already has dozens of co-sponsors in the House, too. It is being publicly touted by Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), who claimed it would bring the “nation’s employment eligibility system into the 21st century,” as well as chief sponsor Smith.

“The Legal Workforce Act turns off the jobs magnet that attracts so many illegal immigrants to the United States,” Rep. Smith said in a statement promoting the measure, ignoring the fact that amnesty and the porous borders have been crucial in encouraging illegal immigration. “The bill expands the E-Verify system and applies it to all U.S. employers. Equally important, the American people support E-Verify,” Smith argued, citing polls showing that Americans overwhelmingly support stronger laws to stop businesses from hiring illegal immigrants. “This bill is a common-sense approach that will reduce illegal immigration and save jobs for legal workers. It deserves the support of everyone who wants to put the interests of American workers first.”

The bill also has the support of several major lobbying powerhouses — including some, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, that are infamous for their support of granting amnesty to illegal immigrants. Other organizations backing the bill include immigration enforcement-focused Numbers USA, the National Restaurant Association, the National Association of Homebuilders, and several others. However, in the past, similar national-ID schemes have met with major opposition from groups including Downsize DC, the Rutherford Institute, the American Policy Center, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, the Republican Liberty Caucus, the U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation, Conservative Republican Women, and many more.

In a letter to lawmakers about the same legislation in the 112th Congress (2011-2012), that broad coalition of organizations blasted the bill as an affront to freedom and the Constitution. Among other concerns, they said it “violates individual civil liberties such as the right to work and free speech; mandates a costly job-killing regulatory burden that cripples small business; requires employers to become enforcement agents of the federal government; and encourages identify theft of law-abiding citizens.” The bill should never have even left committee, according to opponents.

“It is anathema to limited government, the right to privacy, free enterprise and prosperity,” the coalition said in the letter to members of Congress. “It violates the philosophy of the Constitution and intent of the Framers by subordinating the liberty of citizens to the administrative convenience of government. And the Founding Fathers would have rebelled against such a staggering Federal intrusion into every workplace in the nation and our personal civil liberties."      

As The New American reported as far back as 2010, the same plot to impose a national ID on America has been pushed before by some of the leading Big Government-mongers in Congress. The “bipartisan” amnesty-national ID legislation pushed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and backed by Obama in 2010 eventually failed due to a massive uprising against legalizing illegal immigrants. Back then, though, promoters of the biometric national ID scheme were boasting about their machinations.

“Our plan has four pillars: requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here,” wrote Graham and Schumer in a joint op-ed promoting their legislation. “We would require all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who want jobs to obtain a high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security card.” At the time, Obama called the proposal “a promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be the basis for moving forward.”

With the amnesty provision now out of the more recent bill — Obama is using executive decrees funded by the GOP Congress in a bid to provide amnesty anyway — analysts say the national ID plot stands a much greater chance of coming to fruition. In addition to being unconstitutional by virtue of the fact that the Constitution grants no power over identification systems to the federal government, history shows that national ID schemes are dangerous and very often abused by authorities. Considering the U.S. government's track record, Americans can be sure that, if the plot becomes law, the ID regime will be eventually be abused as well.

If solving the illegal immigration crisis is truly the goal, there is a much simpler solution. Rather than foisting an unconstitutional national ID scheme on Americans and building a massive database, Congress could stop funding Obama's amnesty decrees and ensure that the borders are secure. For that to happen, though, Americans who value liberty and the Constitution must get involved.

______________________________________________________________________

Rep. Lamar Smith speaks about his E-verify bill 

to "help protect American and legal workers"

What About Stopping Illegals &
The "Illegal in Chief" in the First Place?

Legal Workforce Act Opposed by
North Carolina Farm Bureau:

TED CRUZ, BORN IN SOCIALIST CANADA, BUSH TRAINED: PROS AND CONS~WIFE, GOLDMAN SACHS V.P. TAKES LEAVE (FOR POLITICAL REASON), TED BUYS OBAMACARE DESPITE BEING AGAINST IT~WIFE DID NORTH AMERICAN "COMMUNITARIAN" WORK FOR GLOBALIST COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

"CHRISTIAN" CANDIDATE  FOR U.S. PRESIDENT? CAREFUL NOW! IF CHRISTIAN, WHAT CHURCH DO THEY ATTEND,  AND WHEN, IF EVER, WERE THEY SAVED? DOES ANYONE KNOW? QUESTION FOR CRUZ:  SALVATION WITHOUT CHRIST IS STILL SALVATION? NOT THE TRUE GOSPEL JOHN 14:6-"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." SEE: http://christiannews.net/2015/03/24/god-isnt-done-with-america-ted-cruz-announces-candidacy-for-president-of-united-states/; EXCERPT: “There are people who wonder if faith is real,” Cruz said. “I can tell you, in my family there’s not a second of doubt, because were it not for the transformative love of Jesus Christ, I would have been saved and I would have been raised by a single mom without my father in the household.” Ted Cruz: Pros And Cons by Chuck Baldwin  http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3300/Ted-Cruz-Pros-And-Cons.aspx; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes: Published: Thursday, March 26, 2015

Texas Senator Ted Cruz made his candidacy for President of the United States official this week. He is the first Republican to officially jump into the presidential race. He chose my alma mater, Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, to make the announcement. Readers immediately inundated me with requests for my thoughts on his candidacy. Today’s column will attempt to answer those requests. Mind you, these are preliminary thoughts, subject to change one way or the other as I learn more about Senator Cruz. Before I list what seem to me to be more obvious pros and cons of his candidacy, let me say that it is extremely obvious that Mr. Cruz is wanting to “corner the market” on the Christian conservative vote and make them the ideological and political base of his campaign. The fact that he chose Liberty University, the largest evangelical Christian university in the country, to make his announcement makes it crystal clear. And if some of the early reactions to the senator’s strategy are any indication of whether Senator Cruz succeeded or not, it may seem that he has taken a big step in that regard. While the politically potent Religious Right of the Reagan/Bush era is only a shell of its former self, it is a stark reality that no Republican since Richard Nixon has won a presidential race without the enthusiastic support of Christian conservatives. Republican presidential candidates must at least APPEAR “conservative” enough to attract the base of religious conservatives or face a thumping in the general election. If you don’t believe that, just ask John McCain and Mitt Romney. And even though G.W. Bush was no conservative, Karl Rove and Company did a stellar job of packaging him that way. And as we know, more often than not, image garners more votes than reality. Sad but true. Former Texas Governor, Rick Perry, attempted the same thing in his presidential campaign in 2012, but was never able to make it stick. By casting himself as the “Christian” candidate, Ted Cruz is trying to follow the campaign script of fellow Texan (and the last Republican to actually win the White House), G.W. Bush. And, of course, Cruz actually worked in the Bush campaign, so he has first-hand experience with it. And this is not something that Cruz feels uncomfortable doing. He is the son of an evangelical pastor and graduated from a Baptist high school. Accordingly, Cruz can naturally talk the language. Since Jerry Falwell passed away, there is no evangelical leader with the ability and clout to coalesce, lead, and speak on behalf of enough Christian voters to make a lot of difference in Republican politics today. Plus, as a whole, the Religious Right has compromised its principles (and showed itself very ignorant of New World Order issues) so many times, and has disenfranchised so many religious conservatives that, as a movement, the Religious Right really doesn’t even exist today. However, if one wants to get an idea of what the remnant of the old Religious Right is thinking today, read what my friend Richard Viguerie has to say. Richard is one of the original founders of what became known as the Moral Majority and then the Religious Right. He is still very influential with those who would identify themselves as part of the Religious Right. And Richard has glowing words for Mr. Cruz: “Today’s official announcement that Senator Ted Cruz of Texas is running for president changes everything in the 2016 presidential campaign. “Ted Cruz isn’t running for Vice President or Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the Jeb Bush administration. “Every Republican candidate for president will have to move to significantly to the right, starting with Jeb Bush and Scott Walker, and define their position on amnesty for illegal aliens, on fighting and winning the war radical Islam has declared on America, on spending, the deficit and the debt, and on repealing Obamacare, against the positions Ted Cruz will talk about and campaign on in the coming months. “They will all have to move right to respond to Cruz, or be left behind by a grassroots conservative electorate fed-up with Republican candidates who are merely principle-free messengers for an out of touch Washington elite. “Ted Cruz’s base is the conservative movement, and although other Republican presidential candidates since Ronald Reagan, such as Gary Bauer and Michelle Bachmann, looked to movement conservatives for their support, they were never able to expand beyond their starting base of support into the top-tier of candidates. “Ted Cruz is the first top-tier movement conservative candidate since Reagan.” See Richard Viguerie’s complete statement here: Cruz is the First Top-Tier Movement Conservative Candidate Since Reagan I don’t remember Richard making such a statement about Rick Perry in 2012, so the above remarks regarding Senator Cruz from someone of the stature of Richard Viguerie mean that Ted has succeeded (at least initially) in establishing himself as the “Christian” candidate in the 2016 presidential race. Before leaving this section of the column, let me say that I believe MUCH has changed from 2000, when G.W. Bush was first elected. The compromise and demise of the Religious Right as a political movement means that pseudo-conservatives, such as G.W. Bush, are going to have a much tougher time winning the support of principled freedomists--many of whom are Christians who are fed up with the compromise of professing “Christian” candidates--and many who would not even identify themselves as Christians, but who were once attracted to the political principles of the Religious Right, and who now have lost all respect for the old Religious Right in general and the Republican Party in particular. Too, the candidacy of Ron Paul in 2008--and especially in 2012--has FOREVER changed the political landscape of America (for the better). The defection of the “Paul Revolutionaries” from the Republican Party has been massive. Yes, many of Ron’s supporters are still very much involved in the GOP, but they are NOT LOYAL to the GOP. Meaning, any Republican candidate for President will have to EARN the vote of these people. They will not receive their vote simply because they wear the Republican label. Again, ask McCain and Romney, if you don’t believe that. Therefore, while it is still good strategy for a Republican presidential candidate to court the evangelical vote, it will not, by itself, carry the same momentum throughout the primary and general election seasons like it did with G.W. Bush in 2000. And as far as Cruz pulling the rest of the GOP field to the right, most every Republican candidate attempts to characterize him or herself as a “conservative” during the primaries, a Ted Cruz candidacy notwithstanding. Of course, Jeb Bush is counting on the big dollars of country club, NWO elites to buy him the nomination. Big-Government globalists everywhere must be salivating over another potential Bush vs. Clinton (not that Hillary has the Democrat nomination sewed up, because she doesn’t) presidential election. It would mean the Crime Family (no matter which one would win) would be back in the White House. At any rate, here are some of my preliminary assessments of Ted Cruz. Pros *The “Christian” candidate His ability to cast himself early on as “the” Christian candidate will definitely be a plus as he approaches the primary season. On a personal note, I would rather vote for an unbeliever who would preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States than a believer who would NOT preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. In my opinion, Christians on the whole are very naïve to vote for political candidates based on his or her “Christian” profession alone. Just about every politician in the country claims to be a Christian. That, by itself, means very little to the actual performance of most elected officials. It SHOULD, but it doesn’t. But for the purpose of this column, I’m saying that Mr. Cruz’s decision to not shy away from a Christian testimony should not be regarded as a negative--especially in light of all of the anti-Christian bias in the establishment media. *His voting record in general He has a cumulative voting record of 89% by The Freedom Index of The New American magazine. The Freedom Index is one of the best barometers of a congressman or senator’s constitutional voting record that I know of. That Cruz is right at 90% on The Freedom Index is nothing but a positive. See his rating on The Freedom Index here: Ted Cruz's Profile-The Freedom Index *His leadership against illegal immigration and executive amnesty Senator Cruz must be regarded as one of the senate’s most outspoken opponents of Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order in particular and illegal immigration in general. *As far as I can tell, Mr. Cruz is solid on the Second Amendment and pro-life issues For me, these two issues are deal breakers. I will not vote for ANY candidate that compromises either one of these two issues. In this regard, potential GOP presidential candidate, Dr. Ben Carson, is going to have problems, as he is on record as strongly advocating additional gun control. Cons *His place of birth Much was made in the Republican Party over Barack Obama’s birthplace. In my personal opinion, those concerns were very legitimate. I’ll say it outright: I believe Obama’s U.S. birth certificate is a forgery. In all likelihood, Obama is indeed the first President of the United States to not be born in the U.S. But, unfortunately, he won’t be the last. The Republicans nominated John McCain for President in 2008, and McCain was not born in the United States, either. Yes, he was born on a U.S. military installation overseas and his parents were both Americans. So, in the minds of everyone in the Republican Party, McCain met the “natural born Citizen” requirement of the U.S. Constitution. But with Senator Cruz, there is no question regarding his place of birth. The man was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His father was a native-born Cuban who became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2005, and his mother was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware. This fact will probably not hurt Ted during the GOP primaries, but should he win the nomination, you can bet that Democrats will make it a huge issue in the general election, especially after all of the controversy that Obama endured over the subject. Plus, if Ted Cruz should win the White House next year, it would doubtless open the door for just about anyone to run for President no matter their place of birth. Remember, this was the issue that stopped Arnold Schwarzenegger from running for President not too many years ago. Obviously, many take the position that as long as a person is born to a U.S. citizen, he or she automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, regardless of the location of his or her birth. But there is no question that Democrats will make Ted’s birthplace an issue in the general election, should he win the Republican nomination. *His pro-war foreign policy In my opinion, this is where the establishment Republican Party in Washington, D.C., is at its WORST. G.W. Bush’s preemptive war doctrine turned the national GOP into a pro-war leviathan. Like most every Republican in Washington, D.C., (except Rand Paul) Cruz has bought into the global “war on terror” apparition that is spawning the New World Order abroad and a Police State at home. There is nothing about Ted Cruz that leads me to believe that he would do anything to stop America’s militarism and hegemony that is wreaking havoc around the world and that is leading our country toward nuclear war. And one further note on this point: though it is going to be difficult for Rand Paul to win the Republican nomination, as he is the establishment elite’s most dreaded candidate, Dr. Paul would in all actuality be the most formidable Republican presidential candidate in the general election. More people than ever are not voting. More people than ever are claiming to be political independents. More people than ever have developed strong opinions against both major parties in Washington, D.C. And one of the biggest reasons for this phenomenon is the Warfare State that both parties in D.C. have created. In reality, Rand Paul’s foreign policy is in sync with more Americans across the board than any other potential candidate from either the Republican or Democrat party. Again, pro-war Republicans might look askance at Rand Paul, but in a general election, his appeal would be massive. Look at how popular Dr. Paul is becoming on the college campuses of America. But if the national GOP follows suit, they would rather lose with a candidate like John McCain or Mitt Romney--or any other pro-war candidate--than win with a constitutional foreign policy candidate such as Ron or Rand Paul. But we’ll see. Rand is not officially in the race yet. *His wife Ted Cruz is married to Heidi Nelson Cruz. Heidi will be lauded by everyone in the establishment media as very smart, educated (she is), and nothing but an asset to Ted’s presidential efforts. But Heidi gives me nothing but red flags. Heidi worked in the White House for Condoleezza Rice. Heidi is head of the Southwest Region in the investment Management Division of Goldman Sachs & Co, and was also an active member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Heidi is an international investment banker who was invited to be part of a working group at the CFR which reviewed a notorious 2005 paper called “Building a North American Community.” This project was headed by longtime CFR member Robert Pastor and is universally regarded by constitutionalists as the prototype for a North American Union. Of course, Condoleezza Rice, herself, is a longtime CFR member. In my opinion, there is no more nefarious organization in the country than the CFR. Without a doubt, it has been the most influential organization over America’s foreign policy affairs of any organization to ever exist. It is the CFR that has long pushed the United States into regionalization and globalism. It is the CFR that is most responsible for pushing America into a New World Order. CFR members litter the presidential administrations of both Republicans and Democrats, which is why no matter which party assumes the White House, nothing changes in the direction of America’s foreign policy. And, of course, Goldman Sachs is, by far, the largest and most influential international banking system in the country. Everything that is harmful to the economic independence of America is spearheaded by Goldman Sachs. Yes, I realize that there are good people who have been part of the CFR (Admiral Chester Ward, for example), and doubtless there must be a few good folks who work for a company as large as Goldman, but Heidi’s longstanding connections with these two organizations do give me pause. Mind you, at this point, I am not condemning, just pointing out red flags. *His infatuation with Israel Ted Cruz recently spoke before the non-partisan group “In Defense of Christians” (IDC). In so doing, he began to laud, not the Christians who are suffering in the Middle East (which the organization is designed to help), but the modern state of Israel. When he did this, he was booed by the audience. Cruz became very angry and walked off the stage, saying, “If you will not stand with Israel and the Jews, then I will not stand with you.” But that was not the point. The IDC is all about helping persecuted Christians in the Middle East. And, yes, sometimes it is Israel that does the persecuting. Senator Cruz apparently has no cognizance of the fact that Christians are often persecuted by both Muslims and Jews. Either Mr. Cruz didn’t understand the purpose of the IDC and the plight of Christians in the Middle East, or, the for the sake of a publicity stunt, he deliberately chose to throw the Jewish factor in the face of those folks knowing the sensitivity of their feelings at Christians sometimes being persecuted by Jews. No one but Ted Cruz knows his heart in the matter. See the IDC website here: In Defense Of Christians As he is trying to establish himself as “the” Christian candidate, it is understandable that Cruz would try to ingratiate himself to conservative Christians. And, unfortunately, most evangelical Christians and pastors have the same basic approach to Israel that they have to civil government. The misinterpretation of Romans 13 causes them to say, “Obey government no matter what.” And the misinterpretation of Genesis 12 causes them to say, “Support Israel no matter what.” Both of these positions are not only unscriptural, they are very dangerous to America. Instead of demanding that Middle Eastern Christians “stand with Israel,” Senator Cruz should have encouraged them to stand faithful to Christ, which is the message that those folks needed and were looking for. And given Senator Cruz’s outspoken Christian profession, this is the message they thought they would hear him give. After all, why else would such a group invite him to speak in the first place? When the day comes that an American Christian senator (and maybe President) will lend credence to suffering Christians in the Middle East being more loyal to the political policies of a foreign country (in this case, the United States) than to them being faithful to their Savior, Jesus Christ, demonstrates that something is VERY, VERY wrong with the religion of American Christianity. There you have it. These are my preliminary thoughts on the presidential candidacy of Senator Ted Cruz. I reserve the right to adjust these thoughts, one way or the other, as I learn more. ___________________________________________________________________ Sen. Ted Cruz tells CNN he will sign up for Obamacare; "Because It's the Law & There Wouldn't Be a Double Standard"?: ALWAYS OBEY GOVERNMENT'S ILLEGAL LAWS?; ROMANS 13 MISINTERPRETED AGAIN? LOOKS RATHER LIKE HYPOCRISY! HEIDI CRUZ: DISSOLVING AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY  WITH CATHOLIC STYLE COMMUNITARIANISM; NOT CHRISTIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM Ted Cruz: First President of the North American Union? Published on Mar 25, 2015 Monday marked the start of the Next News Network’s Selection 2016 coverage as Senator Ted Cruz made it official with these colorful words captured by ABC News while speaking at Liberty University Ted Cruz says he believes in you… that is why he’s running… but should we believe in him? Just who is Ted Cruz? After my quick hit news report on Monday the youtube comments section erupted. “Preps Etcetera” posted my favorite comment with this revelation: Oh... pulease....You should all be aware that Ted Cruz’s wife Heidi is a vice president for Goldman Sachs. Would they be more disturbed to know about her work on the independent task force that wrote “Building a North American Community” which was sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Well Preps you just opened up a can of worms... Now... before you get your tea bags in a bunch about this Ted Cruz pile on... lets take a step back to understand what Preps is saying… now, if you love America as much as you say then you’ll listen very closely. So Ted Cruz stands up and says its time to step up and restore the American promise - but what promise is he speaking of? The promise his wife broke when she sold America out to the Council on Foreign relations? The promise she broke when she began work on “Building a North American Community”? What the heck is that you ask? Yes it sounds so innocent… “We’re just building a community for North America” surely you can’t be against building community right? Well YES Mrs. Ted Cruz… I AM. So how do you dissolve a nation’s sovereignty peacefully and with the people’s consent? Just ask Mrs. Cruz or anyone living in Europe for that matter… they all use one currency now. You see… The transformation of Europe into a single national body with its own bank, legislative body and military force took many many years to accomplish about 42 to be exact. It began with the Treaty of Paris in 1951 that created European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). Then when the 1957 Treaty of Rome was signed it morphed into the The European Economic Community (EEC). In 1993 by order of the Maastrict Treaty it was renamed the European Community (EC) and absorbed by the newly formed European Union. So why is this important to Americans? Well one only needs to work the clock backwards from Heidi Cruz’s work to “Build a North American Community” to see what the globalists have in store for this hemisphere. Read more