Translate

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

RUTH HALEY BARTON TO SPEAK AT ASSEMBLY OF GOD "BELIEVE" CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013


As reported by this blog previously, Barton will bring her contemplative ideas to the Assembly of God conference, "Believe". Now, Lighthouse Trails Research expands http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/newsletters/2013/newsletters20130415.htm.
The full text is here:

SPECIAL REPORT: Assemblies of God “Believe” Conference Makes Bold Move – 
Brings in Contemplative Key Player Ruth Haley Barton
This August, in Orlando, Florida, the Assemblies of God USA will be presenting their
General Council Conference, which takes place every two years. The title of this year’s
event is ”BELIEVE.” Scheduled to speak to “women in ministry” on one of the nights is
Ruth Haley Barton. This is a bold move that the Assemblies of God is making because
Barton is a major player in bringing contemplative mystical (i.e., mantra-based) prayer
into the evangelical church.
The mission statement for the conference is “Believe we are on the cusp of an unparalleled
Spiritual awakening.”1 On the conference website, it states: GENERAL COUNCIL is the 
Assemblies of God’s largest gathering. It takes place every two years bringing church 
leaders together from all around the world.2
It also says that the event will inspire encounters with God, shape the Assemblies of God
movement, and enhance [AOG leaders] ”skills and be inspired to advance the kingdom of God.”
While the Assemblies of God denomination has been going in the contemplative direction for
some time, especially within the AOG theological seminary, to bring a major contemplative
player in as a speaker to the movement’s main leadership conference illustrates how much
AOG has absorbed contemplative spirituality over the last few years especially.
As a little background, in 2005, Lighthouse Trails addressed the issue of contemplative coming
into AOG when we discussed Professor Earl Creps, director of the Doctor of Ministry at the
Assemblies of God Theological Seminary. Creps is probably one of the earliest figures within
the AOG movement to bring contemplative into AOG. In one document titled “Leading Others
and Myself,” Creps lists a number of New Spirituality, emerging church and contemplative
proponents as people he turns to.3 A 2006 LT article, “Assemblies of God: Committed to 
Spiritual Formation, Contemplative and Emerging,” stated: If Assemblies of God Theological 
Seminary is any indication, then AOG is heading straight towards contemplative spirituality 
and the emerging church. Earl Creps . . . is a heavy proponent of both contemplative and 
emerging. In his course syllabi over the last five years, Creps has classes with titles such as 
“Leading the Emerging Church” and “Models of Ministry in the Emerging Church.” Syllabus 
reading materials include those from Henri Nouwen, Brian McLaren, Ken Blanchard, Dan Kimball,
 . . . and Leonard Sweet. A visit to Creps’ “Spiritual Adventures” blog gives a hearty helping of 
emergent discussion. In one blog, Creps tries to show how there might be a union between 
Pentecostalism and the emerging church [i.e. contemplative], saying the relationship is “gaining 
some traction.”
As in most cases now, contemplative starts coming into a denomination through seminaries,
colleges, and universities, and in time reveals itself in the main body of that movement. That
is now what is happening with AOG bringing in Ruth Haley Barton to the General Council
event this year where AOG leaders from around the world will be participating.
For those who have followed Lighthouse Trails, you will know that Barton was trained at the
Shalem Institute for Spiritual Formation in Washington, DC where she, according to her own
words, was “under the guidance of Tilden Edwards, Rosemary Dougherty and Gerald May.”
On Ruth Haley Barton’s Transforming Center website, she enthusiastically acknowledges
being trained there, but the site gives a vague and almost oxymoronic disclaimer saying:
“While she values allthat she has gained from the teachers and institutions in which she has
studied, this does not imply endorsement of everything taught in these environments.”4
(emphasis added)
We could talk about the beliefs of Tilden Edwards, Rosemary Dougherty, and Gerald May,
but we have in other articles that can be looked up on our research site and read. Basically,
these teachers are contemplative mystics who adhere to panentheism and universalism. It
was Edwards who said that, “This mystical stream [contemplative prayer] is the Western
bridge to Far Eastern spirituality (Spiritual Friend, p. 18). In other words, contemplative
spirituality draws all religions together in unity under the common denominator of mysticism.
Who is Ruth Haley Barton?
After Barton finished her training at the Shalem Institute, she became the Associate Director
of Spiritual Formation at Willow Creek Community Church and co-authored (with John
Ortberg) a Spiritual Formation curriculum for Willow Creek. In time, Ortberg moved on to
become pastor at Menlo Park Presbyterian in California, and Barton left to found the
Transforming Center, which claims to train thousands of pastors and leaders in the
contemplative way. She has written a number of books – virtually all having the core message
that you gain intimacy with God through the silence (that is her predominant message). Some
of these books are: Invitation to Solitude and Silence (foreword by Dallas Willard), Sacred 
Rhythms, Strengthening the Soul of Your Leadership, and one of her more recent ones
Pursuing God’s Will Together: A Discernment Practice for Leadership Groups.
So what is it exactly that Barton teaches? In a Christianity Today article titled “Drawing Closer 
to God,” Barton describes the practice of contemplative prayer, saying, “Ask for a simple prayer
to express your willingness to meet God in the silence . . . a simple statement . . . such as ‘Here
I am. . . . ’ Help yourself return to your original intent by repeating the prayer that you have
chosen.”
In Barton’s popular book, Invitation to Solitude and Silence, she goes into more depth: Identify
your sacred space and time. Explore all the possibilities for a time and physical space in which 
you can be alone on a regular basis (p. 40) Begin with a modest goal, especially if silence is a new 
practice for you. Ten, fifteen or twenty minutes of time spent in actual silence is realistic, 
depending on such factors as your personality, pace of life, reliance on words and activity (p. 41).
Settle into a comfortable yet alert physical position (p. 41). Ask God to give you a simple prayer 
that expresses your openness and desire for God. Choose a prayer phrase that expresses your 
desire or need for God these days in the simplest terms possible. It is best if the prayer is not more 
than six to eight syllables so that it can be prayed very naturally in the rhythm of your breathing. 
Pray this prayer several times as an entry into silence and also as a way of dealing with distractions. 
Distractions are inevitable, so when they come, simply let them go by like clouds floating across 
the sky. Help yourself return to the prayerful intent by repeating the prayer you have chosen. 
Use your prayer phrase for as long as it captures what is most true about your heart’s desire for 
God, and link it with a body posture that also helps you express your spiritual desire (pp. 41-42).
In regard to Barton’s disclaimer on her website, she can say that she does not endorse everything
she was taught at Shalem Institute, but the fact of the matter is what she just described above is
the essence of what Shalem believes and teaches. Everything they teach stems from this mystical
prayer. Perhaps she is implying that she does not adhere to their panentheistic (God in all) and
universalist (all are saved) views, but that would be ironic because these are the things that are
produced by practicing contemplative prayer. Ray Yungen calls them the “fruit” of contemplative
prayer. In A Time of Departing, Yungen discusses Shalem and its role in Barton’s spiritual life. He
includes a quote found on Shalem’s website to show the underlying roots of Shalem’s ultimate goal:
In Christianity and other traditions that understand God to be present everywhere, contemplation 
includes a reverence for the Divine Mystery, “finding God in all things,” [panentheism] or “being 
open to God’s presence, however it may appear. (5)
Yungen shares his concerns about Ruth Haley Barton: “[Barton] echoes [goddess worshipper] 
Sue Monk Kidd in many ways, including the general malaise or condition of the human soul. 
Barton recounts: A few years ago, I began to recognize an inner chaos in my soul . . . No 
matter how much I prayed, read the Bible, and listened to good teaching, I could not calm 
the internal roar created by questions with no answers. (“Beyond Words“)
“The following scenario Barton relates could be the wave of the future for the evangelical 
church if this movement continues to unfold in the manner it already has: I sought out a 
spiritual director, someone well versed in the ways of the soul . . . eventually this wise woman 
said to me, . . . “What you need is stillness and silence so that the sediment can settle and 
the water can become clear.” . . . I decided to accept this invitation to move beyond my 
addiction to words (“Beyond Words”)
“By ‘addiction to words’ [Barton] means normal ways of praying. She still uses words, but only 
three of them, ‘Here I am.’ This is nothing more than the Cloud of Unknowing or [Henri Nouwen's] 
prayer of the heart. Like Richard Foster, Barton argues that God cannot be reached adequately, 
if at all, without the silence. In referring to I Kings 19 when Elijah was hiding in a cave, Barton 
encourages: God loves us enough to wait for us to come openly to Him. Elijah’s experience 
shows that God doesn’t scream to get our attention. Instead, we learn that our willingness to 
listen in silence opens up a quiet space in which we can hear His voice, a voice that longs to 
speak and offer us guidance for our next step. (“Beyond Words”)
“What Barton fails to mention here is that Elijah was a valiant defender of the belief in the one, 
unique God – Yahweh (as seen in his encounter with the 450 prophets of Baal), and he never 
went into an altered state of silence in his personal encounter with God.” (A Time of Departing
2nd. ed., pp. 172-173)
Those reading this who are skeptical about what we are saying may be asking, “What’s so 
wrong about repeating a word or phrase and going into an altered state of silence?” To this 
we answer, this state of silence is the same state that occultists and Eastern meditation 
practitioners enter when practicing transcendental meditation (TM). We can prove this by the 
words of one of the men who trained Ruth Haley Barton – Gerald May (from Shalem Institute). 
May wrote the foreword to a book titled Zen for Christians. In that book, he says the following: 
I began to explore Eastern religions . . . I was taking my spiritual business elsewhere. Or 
so I thought. What surprised me, eventually, was that my foray into Buddhism led me in a kind 
of circle, back to my Christian roots. Over time, Buddhist practices [meditation] somehow 
revealed to me the rich resources of Christian contemplative tradition that had been there 
all along . . . I was not alone in that experience. . . [Those on the contemplative road] in their 
searching, many turned toward the East and experienced exactly what I had – an 
eventual discovery of deep nourishment [Eastern enlightenment] within their own original 
traditions. The phenomenon happened so frequently that we gave it a name: “pilgrimage 
home.” May was correct in stating that so-called “Christian” contemplative prayer is the 
same as Buddhist meditation. As one adherent admitted, “The meditation of advanced 
occultists is identical with the prayer of advanced mystics” (Kirby, Mission of Mysticism, p. 7). 
Who are the “advanced mystics”? There are plenty of them, names you probably know: 
Henri Nouwen, Richard Foster, Thomas Merton, Richard Rohr, and to that list we add Ruth 
Haley Barton. Consider this: On Barton’s website, she sells books by Catholic priest and 
contemplative activist Richard Rohr. In addition, she quotes him (in a prominent spot) 
in her recent book Pursuing God’s Will Together from his book, Everything Belongs. 
Typical of other contemplatives, such as Thomas Merton, Rohr believes that everything is 
connected together and that all is divine (thus, everybody belongs to the kingdom of God). 
In his 2011 book, Falling Upward, Rohr implies that we all are ”immaculate conception[s]” 
(p. ix). If these things are true, then there was no need for Jesus Christ to die on the Cross 
for the sins of mankind. We would not need a Savior because we would already be 
divine ourselves. In truth, contemplative spirituality is the antithesis of the Gospel. That is why 
there are countless mystics who claim to know God (or Jesus) but will have nothing to do with 
the Cross.
In a YouTube teaching video "Sacred Rhythms Group Bible Study" by Barton, she tells viewers,
“You have nothing to lose and a whole lot to gain [if you follow her instructions],” 

but we say you have everything to lose and nothing to gain if you go down the contemplative 
path. Sadly, instead of being on the “cusp of an unparalleled Spiritual Awakening,” it appears 
that the Assemblies of God is going to be losing “a whole lot” in the days to come as 
they further open themselves to the contemplative “silence” and the spiritual deception that 
accompanies it. Our warning here is to be taken seriously. William Shannon, Thomas 
Merton’s biographer, validated our concern when he made the following observation: 
If one wants to understand Merton’s going to the East it is important to understand that 
it was his rootedness in his own faith tradition [Catholicism] that gave him the spiritual 
equipment [contemplative prayer] he needed to grasp the way of wisdom that is proper 
to the East. (Silent Lamp, p. 281)
This is what Tilden Edwards meant by the bridge to Far Eastern spirituality. Merton didn’t
become a Buddhist; rather he grasped the way that “is proper to the East.” That is how Merton,
as a Catholic monk, could say, “I intend to become as good a Buddhist as I can.”* In other words,
while you don’t become a Buddhist, you absorb the Buddhist view into your Christianity. This is
the underlying herald cry of the contemplative prayer movement, and it is something that can
never be reconciled with the message of the Cross.
The ironic thing is that the Assemblies of God has traditionally held to the biblical view of the end
times whereas contemplative spirituality lines up with a universal world religion, which will
encompass all humanity and unite under the man of sin. There has never been anything on the
scene before that would allow a universal religion that appeals to people on a broad scale. But
first people have to hook up to the common factor and binding agent of this one-world religion,
and that is contemplative prayer!

*David Steindl-Rast, “Recollection of Thomas Merton’s Last Days in the West” (Monastic Studies,
7:10, 1969).

Saturday, April 13, 2013

UPDATE: CHALLENGE TO MELISSA HARRIS-PERRY OF MSNBC WHO SAYS YOUR CHILDREN BELONG TO THE COLLECTIVIST STATE

    Pastor Ralph Ovadal of Pilgrims Covenant Church, Monroe, Wisconsin, www.pccmonroe.org, has commented on the remarks of Melissa Harris-Perry of MSNBC. He recommends that all Christians should remove their children from the Godless government school system and that the Bible declares that it is the parents' responsibility to educate the children. Listen to his excellent 26 minute sermon here: http://www.sermonaudio.com/playpopup.asp?SID=41213917230, or see srmonaudio.com at http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=41213917230 for download.
    What other pastors have dared to speak out on this issue? We will attempt to find them, but don't hold your breath!
    Meanwhile, there has been outrage from secular media about this issue, comparing Harris-Perry's remarks to those of Hitler:

Here again is Harris-Perry urging a collectivist mindest when it comes to education of our children. Go to 8 minute mark for the tirade:
and also:
Harris-Perry has a history of exploding at people who don't agree with her thoughts and ideas, such as in this video. Just hold your ground and don't cower or knuckle under to her demagoguery.
Hitler Youth and Nazi Education:
The Adolf Hitler schools:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnXB2wA3hhU.


Friday, April 12, 2013

REPOSTED: "CATHOLICS COME HOME"-JUST SAY NO! REJECT THE CORRUPT COMPROMISERS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH



WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID THE CATHOLIC CHURCH INSTEAD:
Richard Bennett's Berean Beacon www.bereanbeacon.org. He is an ex-Catholic Benedictine priest, educated by the Jesuits. See the latest YouTube video from Richard here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BheUebiKZaI.
A prior video from Richard about Rick Warren given at the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London:

Mike Gendron's Proclaiming the Gospel
http://www.proclaimingthegospel.org/.
The following videos show how the Catholic Church has morphed over the centuries, and how tradition is equal to and/or above the Word of God:




Ken Silva of Apprising has the following articles about Rick Warren:
http://apprising.org/2013/03/12/rick-warren-asks-us-to-fast-and-pray-for-god-to-help-apostates-elect-their-new-pope/.
http://apprising.org/2013/02/13/whats-next-for-rick-warren/.
http://apprising.org/2013/01/29/rick-warren-and-his-brother-his-eminence-timothy-cardinal-dolan-archbishop-of-new-york/.
http://apprising.org/2011/11/08/rick-warren-and-teachings-of-demons/.
http://apprising.org/2010/04/01/the-inadequate-gospel-of-rick-warren/.
http://apprising.org/2010/04/19/rick-warren-awards-purpose-driven-roman-catholics/.
http://apprising.org/2010/07/13/rick-warren-and-roman-catholics/.
http://apprising.org/2008/08/20/refuting-rick-warren/, includes Bob DeWaay's extensive refutation of Warren. This is a followup: http://apprising.org/2008/06/01/pastor-bob-dewaay-on-his-meeting-with-rick-warren/.
http://apprising.org/2007/05/25/southern-baptist-pastor-rick-warren-is-openly-promoting-apostate-roman-catholicism/.
http://apprising.org/2010/04/20/rick-warren-and-purpose-driven-roman-catholics/.

Bob DeWaay of Critical Issues Commentary http://cicministry.org/, has the following on Warren:
http://cicministry.org/commentary/worldview0034.htm.

John MacArthur of Grace to You www.gty.org, on Catholicism, uploaded April 8, 2013:
John MacArthur on Warren's "Purpose Driven Life":
MacArthur and R.C. Sproul on Catholicism:


Roma Downey:
Dave Mosher Blog has a group of excellent posts http://davemosher.wordpress.com/?s=roma+downey on Roma Downey and her New Age beliefs and associations, in particular this one:
http://davemosher.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/touched-by-an-angel-roma-downeys-new-age-ish-little-angels-series-for-preschoolers-claims-to-be-christian/, revised March 27, 2013. In it we see Roma Downey on the cover of OM Times, http://omtimes.com/, a New Age publication. See Downey's biography and interview at OM Times here: http://omtimes.com/2011/07/roma-downey-truly-an-angel/.

David Cloud's Way of Life reports:
Roma Downey, the Roman Catholic co-creator (with her husband) of the History Channel’s popular “The Bible” miniseries, says Pope Francis is “a new pope of hope” (“Roma Downey,” Christian Post, April 4, 2013). Downey, famous for her role as “the angel Monica” in the new-agey TV series “Touched by an Angel,” plays the part of Mary in “The Bible” miniseries. She says the example of Pope Francis will cause “the seeds of hope to flourish in people’s hearts and people’s lives.” In an earlier interview, Downey said, “I have prayed to Mary and loved her my whole life” (“The Bible: An Epic Mini-Series,” Catholiclane.com, Feb. 28, 2013). Roma attended the University of Santa Monica http://www.universityofsantamonica.edu/offering Master's degrees in Spiritual Psychology, “founded by New Age spiritual and self-help guru JohnRoger” (“Roma Downey Happy Out of Spotlight,” Beck/Smith Hollywood, April 23, 2013). She says that she listens to books on tape by New Age guru Eckhart Tolle, who teaches the divinity of man. The creators of “The Bible” miniseries have not been afraid to add to and change God’s Word.

Christian Research Network discusses Downey and the "Bible" miniseries:
http://christianresearchnetwork.org/2013/03/15/roman-catholic-roma-downey-producer-of-the-bible-miniseries-says-francis-i-will-be-a-pope-of-hope/.

Rick Warren's Saddleback Church invited Downey and Burnett to do a "question and answer" time during February 2013 showing of the Bible miniseries: http://saddleback.com/blogs/communityblog/mark-burnett-and-roma-downey-coming-to-saddleback/.

Don Green sermons from Vimeo video:
"Why Are We 'Protestants'? We Reject the Papacy": http://vimeo.com/62695090.
"Why Are We 'Protestants'? We Affirm Sola Scriptura": http://vimeo.com/62713346.

Robert Zins, http://www.cwrc-rz.org/, debates a Roman Catholic priest who believes in universal salvation (universalism):








RUSSIAN ROSOBORONEXPORT HELICOPTERS BEING BOUGHT FOR DELIVERY TO AFGANISTAN BY OBAMA DESPITE BEING ILLEGAL


 




The New American has reported in:
"Defying Congress, Obama Sends U.S. Taxes to Russian State Arms Firm", http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/15074-defying-congress-obama-sends-u-s-taxes-to-russian-state-arms-firm, The New American further references RiaNovosti's articlehttp://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130405/180451358/Pentagon-to-Buy-Russian-Helicopters-Despite-Ban.html.

Arthur R. Thompson, CEO of the John Birch Society has serious concerns about the expansion of Russian production and export of military weapons to various countries in BRICS, the new Communist Bloc, in this YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaWnuGPsUh8.

Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro has authored and sent a letter to Chuck Hagel, Secretary of Defense, and signed by 10 lawmakers demanding to know the reasons: http://delauro.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1211:bipartisan-group-urges-hagel-not-to-purchase-from-rosoboronexport&catid=2:2012-press-releases&Itemid=21.
The above reads in part, followed by the letter to Hagel:
    "Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) led a bipartisan group of members today urging Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel not to purchase additional helicopters from the state-owned Russian arms dealer Rosoboronexport. That company has continued to transfer weapons to the Assad regime, enabling mass atrocities. The group sent the letter amid reports that the Department of Defense is considering purchasing 20 helicopters for the Afghan National Security Forces from the firm.
    Last year DeLauro authored an amendment to the Defense Authorization Act prohibiting the use of funds to enter into any contracts or agreements with Rosoboronexport. That provision is now law. However, there is an exemption if the Secretary of Defense deems it to be in the interest of national security. The members asked Secretary Hagel to explain his justification, writing “What is the national security justification of continuing business with Rosoboronexport? Relatedly, last year, DoD notified Congress of plans to purchase 33 Mi-17s from Rosoboronexport for the Afghan National Security Forces. What is the national security justification for the additional 20 helicopters this year?”
Here is the full text of the letter:
The Honorable Chuck Hagel                                                                                                             
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000

Dear Secretary Hagel,
            We write to oppose any continuation of the Department of Defense’s (DoD) business relationship with Rosoboronexport, Russia’s primary arms exporter and an enabler of the ongoing mass atrocities in Syria.  In January, Section 1277 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13 NDAA; P.L. 112-239), which expressly prohibits the use of funds to enter into any contracts or agreements with Rosoboronexport, was enacted into law. Further, during consideration of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2013, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved an amendment prohibiting further contracts with Rosoboronexport by a vote of 407-5. We urge you to uphold this law and clear expression of Congressional intent by ensuring that any further DoD procurement of helicopters for the Afghan National Security Forces is not conducted through Rosoboronexport. 
            Russia continues to transfer weapons through Rosoboronexport to the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Since the Syrian uprising began, Russia has continued to serve as the Assad regime’s chief supplier of weapons, enabling the mass murder of Syrian citizens at the hands of their own government.  According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, approximately 70,000 Syrians have been killed since the Syrian conflict began nearly two years ago. Despite the ongoing atrocities, Russia’s special envoy to the Middle East, Mikhail Bogdanov, announced on February 13 that Russia would continue to supply weapons to Assad’s regime. In addition, Rosoboronexport Director Anatoly Isaikin told reporters that “in the absence of sanctions, we are continuing to fulfill our contract obligations.” As you know, it is Russia’s veto power as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council that has blocked the imposition of sanctions on the Syrian regime to this point.
             Last summer, DoD notified Congress of plans to exercise an option in an existing contract to purchase additional Mi-17s from Rosoboronexport – plans that Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle and human rights groups opposed.   Despite these clear objections, DOD proceeded, and in response Congress enacted Section 1277 of the FY13 NDAA. 
 Despite this new law, we learned that the Army intends to enter into a new contract with Rosoboronexport in the coming weeks to procure 20 additional helicopters for the Afghan National Security Forces. This plan runs in direct contravention to both the spirit of the FY13 NDAA and the clear legislative intent of Congress – to ban further business dealings with Rosoboronexport. In our view, any attempt by DoD to utilize prior-year funds would constitute a direct subversion of existing law.
 The United States Government has imposed punishing sanctions on Syria and invested precious diplomatic resources to end the conflict there.  The NDAA provision is intended to bolster U.S. policy and ensure that U.S. contracts with Syria’s primary arms dealer do not undermine it.  In order to make certain that U.S. policy on Syria is clear, consistent, and effective, we strongly urge you to certify that no new contracts are concluded or options acted upon between DoD and Rosoboronexport.  Moreover, we urge you to hold an open competition for any further purchases of helicopters for the Afghan National Security Forces. 
Accordingly, we request that your Department prepare a detailed briefing focusing on the following questions and present it to us before the Army takes any action on the pending contract.
What steps has DoD taken to ensure compliance with Section 1277 of the FY13 NDAA and to consider alternative suppliers of helicopters for the Afghan National Security Forces. 
Section 1277 requires DoD, in order to exercise its waiver authority, to certify to Congress that conducting further business with Rosoboronexport is “in the national security interests of the United States.” What is the national security justification of continuing business with Rosoboronexport? Relatedly, last year, DoD notified Congress of plans to purchase 33 Mi-17s from Rosoboronexport for the Afghan National Security Forces. What is the national security justification for the additional 20 helicopters this year?
            The Government Accountability Office and the Defense Contract Audit Agency are undertaking a Congressionally mandated examination of the Army’s existing contract with Rosoboronexport. How is DoD planning to address and incorporate the review’s findings into its practices and protocols?
    
            What steps is DoD taking to ensure that it does not support – financially or otherwise – enablers of mass atrocities?
            Thank you for your serious attention to this request.  We appreciate your prompt response.
 Sincerely,
 ROSA L. DeLAURO                                                        
KAY GRANGER  
JAMES P. MORAN                                                          
JACK KINGSTON 
KEITH ELLISON                                                             
MARTHA ROBY 
CHELLIE PINGREE                                                       
WALTER B. JONES  
FRANK R. WOLF                                                            
JAMES P. McGOVERN



NEW RON PAUL HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM (FREE UP TO GRADE 5)

The New American has announced the new Ron Paul Homeschool Curriculum http://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com/, here:
http://thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/15060-ron-paul-announces-phase-2-of-the-revolution-a-new-homeschooling-program.
Here are two YouTube video introductions:



UPDATE TO APRIL 7, 2013 POST: ARMY OFFICER SENDS 14 PAGE EMAIL TO SUBORDINATES ABOUT ANTI-GAY CHRISTIAN GROUPS


APRIL 12, 2013 UPDATE:

U.S. MILITARY IS BRIEFED THAT CHRISTIANITY IS NUMBER ONE THREAT


Soldiers in the U.S. military have been told in a training briefing, http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ExtremismPresentation.pdf, (page 24), that evangelical Christians are the No. 1 extremist threat to America – ahead of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, KKK, Nation of Islam, al-Qaida, Hamas and others. See: http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/military-warned-evangelicals-no-1-threat/.

UPDATE OF APRIL 12, 2013 from American Family Association:
    An Army officer has sent an email to subordinates labeling conservative Christian organizations as "domestic hate groups" and stating their values don't align with "Army values."
    AFA has obtained the 14-page email sent out by Lt. Col. Jack Rich telling other officers and soldiers at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, that, specifically, the American Family Association and the Family Research Council are "domestic hate groups" because they oppose homosexuality. Rich said: "When we see behaviors that are inconsistent with Army Values, don't just walk by - do the right thing and address the concern before it becomes a problem." 
    Rich took inflammatory and incendiary language directly from the website of the anti-Christian Southern Poverty Law Center, then purposely and specifically chose AFA and FRC as examples of "domestic hate groups."
There are thousands and thousands of people enlisted in the United States Army who are themselves Christian and would resent the fact that this one lieutenant colonel is purporting to speak for the whole Army by saying AFA and FRC don't represent "Army values."

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

HOLMAN PUBLISHERS INSERTS ARTICLE BY CONTEMPLATIVE PROPONENT INTO KING JAMES BIBLES

NOTICE: Lighthouse Trails Research has released important warnings to Christians about Holman Publishers, Calvin Miller and Marcus Borg:
    Lighthouse Trails learned that Holman Bible Publishers (the oldest Bible publisher in America) has inserted an article by a strong contemplative proponent into several of their King James Version Bibles (some of which Lighthouse Trails WAS carrying) including: the Ultra Thin Reference Bible, the Pocket-Sized Bible Classic, the Large Print Ultra Thin Bible, and the Personal Reference Bible. The article in the Bibles is titled, “Why You Should Read the King James Bible,” written by the late Calvin Miller (died 2012). Calvin Miller is an advocate for contemplative/centering prayer.
    The two warnings are as follows, in their entirety:


This is a major issue, and let us tell you 4 reasons why we believe Holman should not have done this:
Calvin Miller
1. Calvin Miller is an advocate for contemplative/centering prayer. Ray Yungen discusses Miller in A Time of Departing:
In Into the Depths of God, [Calvin] Miller encourages readers to engage in centering prayer and explains it as a union between man and God:
“Centering is the merger of two ‘selves’—ours and his [God’s]. Centering is union with Christ. It is not a union that eradicates either self but one that heightens both” (p. 107).
Into the Depths of God is an exhortation in contemplative spirituality and is brimming with quotes by Thomas Merton and other contemplatives. Miller speaks of the “wonderful relationship between ecstasy [mystical state] and transcendence [God],” and says that “Ecstasy is meant to increase our desire for heaven” (p. 96) (A Time of Departing, p. 186).
Into the Depths of God is riddled with favorable quotes by and references to a number of contemplative mystics. In addition to Thomas Merton, there is Evelyn Underhill, St. John of the Cross, Esther de Waal, Kathleen Norris, Hildegard of Bingen, Annie Dillard, Bernard of Clairvaux, and St. Anthony (a Desert Father). In Miller’s newer book, The Disciplined Life, Miller again turns to the mystics. Miller also wrote The Path to Celtic Prayer (Celtic spirituality is another avenue through which contemplative is entering the evangelical church).
2. Secondly, Calvin Miller resonates with emergent teacher Marcus Borg. In Miller’s book, The Book of Jesus (2005), Marcus Borg writes an entire chapter for the book. Miller would never include an entire chapter of his own book if it was written by someone he did not resonate with. As Lighthouse Trails has revealed in past articles and books, Marcus Borg denies the tenets of the Christian faith including the virgin birth, the deity of Christ, and His atonement for sin. Roger Oakland discusses Borg in Faith Undone:
Borg explains in his book The God We Never Knew that his views on God, the Bible, and Christianity were transformed while he was in seminary:
Marcus Borg
“I let go of the notion that the Bible is a divine product. I learned that it is a human cultural product, the product of two ancient communities, biblical Israel and early Christianity. As such, it contained their understandings and affirmations, not statements coming directly or somewhat directly from God. . . . I realized that whatever “divine revelation” and the “inspiration of the Bible” meant (if they meant anything), they did not mean that the Bible was a divine product with divine authority.” (p. 125)
This attitude would certainly explain how Borg could say: “Jesus almost certainly was not born of a virgin, did not think of himself as the Son of God, and did not see his purpose as dying for the sins of the world” (p. 125) (from p. 196, Faith Undone).
There’s no possible way that Calvin Miller could have been familiar with Borg’s writings and not been aware of his blatantly anti-Gospel stance. This is a common problem that Lighthouse Trails has had in the past and continues to have that people we are critical of tend to resonate with those who are blatant in their New Age views, but they themselves appear to be relatively benign to the larger evangelical community. (See a book review of one of Borg’s books.)
3. As we have shown above, Calvin Miller holds to contemplative persuasions. And yet, these Bibles have an article written by him within their pages. What this will do is point Bible readers to Miller and his writings and possibly even to Marcus Borg and his writings. To have Calvin Miller’s article in a Bible seems to be a terrible dichotomy: i.e., the Bible points people to the Gospel’s message of the Cross and man’s sinful state and need of a Savior while contemplative, as a movement, points people to man’s supposed divinity and diminishes the need for a Savior.
4. In view of Calvin Miller’s contemplative propensities, let’s briefly examine his article in the Holman Bibles, “Why You Should Read the King James Bible.” In the article, he lists three reasons why the KJV should be read: 1) it is the version your parents and grandparents read 2) it has literary and poetic strength and beauty, and 3) there is ease in memorizing verses in the KJV because of its “high literary resonance.” While these reasons all produce merit, the article seems to turn the KJV into more of a poetic book than the Word of God. While Lighthouse Trails is not in the category of what some call King James Only (in that that is the only version someone can get saved through), we do see it as a standard high above many of the Bible versions available today. Thus we have come to trust it more than others. We find it noteworthy of these two things: one, that emerging church figures (such as Phyllis Tickle who suggest it is a lovely book of poetic literature but not an authority in our lives and Tony Jones who minimizes the authority of the Bible as the Word of God) have done much to disregard the Bible as God’s inspired Word, and two, that the Holman Bibles include someone (Miller) who resonates with a man (Borg) who rejects the basic fundamentals of Christianity and Miller himself speaks of the poetic nature of the Bible.
Another Possible Ramification:
There are serious implications and possible ramifications regarding what is going on here. For instance, something many may not have considered: The King James Bible has no copyright on it because of its age. Bluntly put, anyone can do anything they want to that Bible and still call it the King James Bible. As an example, in some of Holman’s editions, they have changed the spelling of some words (e.g., Saviour to Savior). This might not seem like a big deal to some people, but how do we know what a particular publisher is changing and not changing? If they can change the spellings of words, they can also omit or change words and phrases. For instance, they could change or remove references to homosexuality (e.g., 1 Corinthians 6:9, Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:27) or to the deity of Christ (e.g., Romans 9:5, Isaiah 40:3 – see more). While we do believe that the Lord will preserve and protect His Word, the “editing” of the Kings James Bible could become a free-for-all to emergent-leaning publishers.
Conclusion: Perhaps it would be a good idea to check inside your own Bibles and ones you are giving as gifts and make sure there are no articles written by contemplative and/or emerging authors. If any reading this feel compelled, here is the contact information for Holman Bible Publishers. If you do contact them, please ask them to remove the article by Calvin Miller in their Bible editions.
Note: Lighthouse Trails has put in two calls into Holman, but we have not yet heard back from anyone regarding this matter.Update: On the afternoon of April 8th, shortly after this article was posted, we received a phone call from someone who works at Holman Publishers. She is going to be passing this article onto the editorial department. We were told that LifeWay Resources is the parent company of B & H (Broadman & Holman).
Holman Bible Publishers
127 9th Avenue N
Nashville, TN 37234-0002
(615) 251-2520
_________________________________________________________
BOOK REVIEW: Putting Away Childish Things, a Tale of Modern Faith by Marcus J. Borg

LTRP Note: While reading this book review
on Marcus Borg’s new book, please bear in mind 
two things: one, that Borg rejects essential tenets 
of the biblical Christian faith (such as that Jesus Christ 
is the Son of God, that he was born of a virgin, and 
that He was God), and two, that numerous emerging 
“progressive” church leaders have at various times 
shown admiration for Borg and his writings (these would 
include Brian McLaren, Rob Bell, Calvin Miller (included Borg 
in his book, The Book of Jesus), Walter Brueggemann 
(helped write Richard Foster’s “Bible”) and at least on 
one occasion, Leonard Sweet). After you read this book 
review, you may better understand why Lighthouse Trails 
is so concerned about the “new” spirituality that has 
entered the Christian church and been embraced by so 
many of its leaders and pastors.

BOOK REVIEW: "Putting Away Childish Things, 
a Tale of  Modern Faith"  by Marcus Borg

                                                                               
By Ted Kyle
Free-lance writer

Putting Away Childish Things, a Tale of Modern Faith by Marcus J. Borg,
published by Harper One, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers, 2010, 342 
pages, $25.99.
Learning to Doubt 101
Marcus J. Borg is a veteran of the Christianity wars, having been at one time a member of 
The Jesus Seminar, a humanist circle of liberal theologians who set themselves the task of 
voting Bible passes “in” or “out,” depending upon their supposed collective wisdom. Borg 
is also professor emeritus in the philosophy department at Oregon State University, and 
the author of the New York Times best-selling Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time, The 
Heart of Christianity, The Last Week, and Jesus (from the dust cover). Borg’s latest book, 
Putting Away Childish Things, is a novel. It is his first work of fiction, but he uses this vehicle
knowledgeably to make his points. His protagonist is Kate Riley, an assistant professor in
the department of religious studies at a small Midwestern liberal arts college. Kate is serious 
about her religion and thinks of herself as a Christian—though her concept of what that 
means would not agree with a conservative’s definition: she has had a lover (from whom 
she distanced herself when she decided he was not marriage-material), as well as other 
sexual encounters, and would not mind another liaison, though the only man she likes in 
her surroundings is gay. He is, accordingly, her best friend but not her lover. The thought 
that extra-marital sex is sinful adultery does not enter the picture—it is no doubt one of the 
strictures that liberals have written out of their workaday Bibles. Sin and the need for 
forgiveness receive no honored place at the table in this book. As a story, this is not an easy 
read, being burdened with its load of liberal doctrine. But as a literary device to lead the 
unwary into swallowing that doctrine, along with the vulnerable student, Erin, it may succeed 
very well. Readers should be aware that this is an agenda-driven book. Virtually everything in 
it is there for a purpose. The author’s most important point is championing the Age of 
Enlightenment’s attack on the inerrancy of the Bible. It is a theme he introduces early 
and often throughout the book, as the following dialog illustrates:
Fiona, a member of Kate’s class, Religion and the Enlightenment, spoke up in an early class
discussion:
“I’ve had a couple of courses from Kate—I mean, Professor Riley—before and one of the 
things I’ve learned is that we need to set aside our worldview if we’re going to understand 
other worldviews…I ‘m not sure where that leads—I just know that there are a lot of different 
ways of seeing.” Another student (Andrew, the class skeptic): “But you must know that our 
way of seeing things is just one among many. How do we know it’s any better?…. There’s no 
one true way of seeing—there are only ways of seeing…. And if you take that 
seriously, it means we can’t really know anything for sure” (p. 101).
Another student (Erin) protests: “I belong to a Christian group… We think there are some
absolutes, that there have to be. Otherwise, anything goes.”
Andrew: “And where do you get your absolutes?
Erin: “Well, we—the group I’m part of—get them from the Bible. We—at least most of us—
think the Bible is infallible, because it’s inspired by the Holy Spirit. And we think that if you don’t 
think that way, then the Bible is just another book, and you get to pick and choose what you 
like and don’t like in it. That’s called cafeteria Christianity.”
Andrew: “So, in a sea of relativity, the Bible is an absolute? The Bible is the exception?”
Kate, the professor, interrupted the silence which followed to say that the discussion is about
“the central question of the course: What happens to the Bible and Christianity within the 
framework of modern thought?… What has happened to the notion of sacred scriptures and 
sacred traditions over the past three centuries because of the encounter with the Enlightenment?” 
It is a thought-provoking session, well-designed to crack open old belief-positions absorbed 
without much thought as children. For many, it opens the floodgates of questions and doubts. 
Others have already passed that stage and now are convinced that the opening chapters of 
Genesis, the miracles in both Testaments, and much else in the Bible are not true. In Kate’s class 
they will be exposed to philosophical arguments to strengthens this disbelief.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR IN THE BOOK
1. The Two Narratives of Jesus’ Birth
One of the major plot twists comes in the form of reaction to a newly-published book by Kate:
Two Stories, One BirthIn the book, she sharply distinguishes between the “stories” of our 
Lord’s birth in Matthew and Luke, instead of fitting them together to give a fuller picture of the 
occasion, as is normally done. Matthew’s account, she wrote, is dark and threatening, being 
dominated by Herod’s plot to kill the infant Jesus. Luke, however, “is basically joyful. There’s no 
plot by Herod to Kill Jesus; instead, there are hymns filled with joy” (page 24). Additionally, her 
book concludes that in Matthew, Mary and Joseph live in Bethlehem, in contrast to Luke’s 
account of the lengthy trip to Bethlehem from Nazareth. She comes to this astounding 
conclusion simply because “Matthew’s narrative makes no mention of the couple traveling there, 
leading us to assume that Bethlehem is their home” (page 31). All this sets the stage for Kate to 
make her case during radio interviews that the stories of Jesus’ birth in both Gospels are parables
—and “parables are about meaning, not factuality. And the truth of a parable is its meaning. 
Parables can be truthful, truth-filled, even while not being historically factual” (page 26). The
interviewer responds with a leading question: “As I understand your book, you’re saying that 
it doesn’t matter whether there was a star of Bethlehem or wise men bringing gifts, or whether 
Jesus was born at home or in a stable, or whether angels sang to shepherds….Would you extend 
this to the virgin birth as well—that it doesn’t matter whether it happened?” (page 27). Kate ducks 
the question: “Well, my emphasis as a historian is on the meaning of a story of a divine 
conception in the context of the first century, not on whether it happened.” Much more is to 
come in Kate’s class sessions, where students are subtly led to question the Genesis account of 
Creation, including the creation of our first parents, Adam and Eve, miracles in both Testaments, 
and much else which is abhorrent to liberal thinking.
[Reviewer’s note: This retreat into theological gobbledygook is standard procedure throughout
the book, in which pregnant suggestions and hanging questions are used to plant doubts, 
rather than making direct assertions regarding the unreliability of the Bible.]
2. Setting Us Straight on Homosexuality—and This Is a Biggie!
Erin, the student who has been part of the campus conservative club, The Way, has begun
to question many things she had formerly taken for granted, such as the inerrancy of the Bible. 
Then, over the Christmas break, she learnedthat her younger brother is gay, and she is caught 
between her feelings for her brother and what the Bible says about homosexuality. Before she 
goes to Kate for guidance, she reads two books she finds in the college library (Dirt, Greed  and 
Sex, by William Countryman andThe New Testament and Homosexuality by Robin Scroggs) 
and in them, she tells Kate, she finds that “homosexuality is an abomination is in a context in 
Leviticus that also forbids lots of things that almost all Christians think are fine. Like planting two 
kinds o seed in the same field or wearing garments made of two kinds of cloth—I mean that 
would rule out blends. We set those laws aside and say they don’t apply to our time—so
why should we think the verse about homosexuality applies to all times? And what they say
about two of the three verses in the New Testament about homosexuality makes sense to me
—that they probably refer to an older man having sex with a young boy… But the part of the 
New Testament that I still have trouble with is that passage from Paul in Romans….” She then 
reads Romans 1:26-27 aloud. “That’s really strong,” she says to Kate. “…That’s thepassage I 
stumble over.” Kate has her read the next verse. Erin reads verse 28, supposedly from her 
NIV Student Bible: “Furthermore, since they [the Gentiles] did not think it worthwhile to retain 
the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be 
done” (page 207).
[Reviewer’s note: The words, “the Gentiles,” are not in the original Greek, nor are they in any
Bible I have ever seen, specifically including the NIV Student Bible. The parenthetical words were 
doubtless added by Borg or an editor to buttress the professor’s argument that Paul is simply 
repeating “standard Jewish synagogue rhetoric about what Gentiles are like” (page 207). Erin, 
who wants to avoid having to regard her brother as under God’s condemnation, is convinced. 
And so might be readers of the book who fail to compare the quotation before them with their 
own Bibles—for the words appear to be part of the sacred text, despite being placed in a 
parenthesis.]
[It seems to this reviewer that Borg has crossed a very hazardous boundary indeed, for the
Bible contains stern warnings about adding to or taking away from God’s Word 
(Deuteronomy 4:2 and Revelation 22:18-19, which includes a dire warning for tampering with 
God’s Word).]
[While the addition of these words may appeal to those who try to abrogate the Bible’s
condemnation of homosexuality, it cannot be shaken. And Paul’s whole argument in Romans 
chapter 1 applies to every individual of whatever persuasion or religion—against “all ungodliness 
and unrighteousness of men, who; hold the truth in unrighteousness” (vs. 18).]
Things then get worse in the counseling session: While Erin is absorbing the impact of Kate’s
suggestion that Paul didn’t really mean to call homosexuality an abomination, Kate goes on to 
suggest that even if Paul did mean exactly what he said, he could very well have been mistaken
—implying that there is no Holy Spirit inspiration involved (page 209).Truly, wickedness is at work 
in this book.
3. Positing Two Jesuses
In a class discussion about the effect of the Enlightenment on the Church’s understanding of
Jesus’ intentions and accomplishments, Kate states in a hand-out that “Jesus as a historical figure
was not the same as the gospels portray him.
This especially the case in John’s gospel”—which, she writes, “is a very developed layer of the
tradition.” In other words, liberal scholars, including The Jesus Seminar, do not believe Jesus 
regarded Himself as the Son of God, or Messiah, or the Bread of Life, etc. Nor do they believe 
Jesus came to Earth to die as the Lamb of God. All these things, they insist, were claimed for Him, 
after His death, by His followers (pages 238-239). These theologians deny especially the factuality 
of John’s Gospel, including our Lord’s assertion that “I am the way, the truth, and the life: 
no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6).
4. Tie-ins with New Age and Emergent Church Thought
Martin, a minor figure in the book, who is Kate’s one-time (and possibly future) lover, outlines
a lecture he will give about mysticism. He jots down: “Would affect our sense of what the word 
‘God’ points to: a reality that can be known and that is ‘all around us’—not a person-
like being ‘out there,’ separate from the universe, a super-powerful authority figure
whose existence can be argued about” (page 133). Later we learn that Kate shares this belief with
Martin (page 276).
Additionally, in perhaps the only inclusion of real persons in the book, Brian McLaren and Jim Wallis
are recommended by a faculty member of the seminary that is inviting Kate to fill a temporary 
position. He says: “I would love to have either of them on our faculty, though I don’t imagine 
they’d be interested. Both are committed evangelicals” (page 149).
5. A Horrifying Glimpse into Liberal Academia
The seminary which has invited Kate for a one-year visiting professorship has, in Martin’s words:
“We have so many specialized points of view here—Asian, African, feminist, womanist, gay, lesbian, 
plus, of course, older white male.” He goes on to say: “Don’t get me wrong—I’ve learned a lot 
from feminist theology and African theology and Asian theology and gay theology, and I’m 
grateful” (page 269).
Conclusion: While I can only conclude that this book will lead readers away from truth
(and from the Gospel) rather than to it, one poem quoted in the book, “Dover Beach” 
written by British poet Matthew Arnold in 1870, moved me. Arnold was attempting to describe 
how people’s faith in God was being shattered by overtly unbiblical challenges.
The sea is calm tonight,
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits—on the French coast the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand,
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night-air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the sea meets the moon-blanch’d land,
Listen! You hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.
Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the Aegean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.
The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furl’d,
But now I only hear its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.
Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! For the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.
The third stanza may seem to tell the tale of the Church’s defensive battle against the attacks
of the Enlightenment—a tale of retreat and gathering impotence in the face of worldly knowledge. 
Yet the tale is true only on the surface, for God, who cannot lie, has sworn that the gates of hell 
shall not prevail against His church. Our Lord has also sworn that His Gospel “shall be preached i
n all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come” (Matt. 24:14).
Though the church in our land is beleaguered, let us recall that “… They are not all Israel, which 
are of Israel”(Rom. 9:6), and that all this was foretold: “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that i
n the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines 
of devils” (1 Tim. 4:1).
The Church in America, as in Europe in general, has forgotten that “…strait is the gate, and 
narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it” (Matt. 7:14). We are 
called to live as pilgrims and sojourners in a strange land, for this land is not our true home: 
we seek another! Meanwhile, let us soldier on for our Captain, holding His banner high, knowing 
that our work is not in vain—for our Father declared, “So shall my word be that goeth forth 
out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, 
and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it” (Isa. 55:11).
Praise His Name!
P.S.: If you wonder about Borg’s title, as I did, I have to tell you that he never mentions
it in the book. But it dawned on me eventually that he is describing Erin, the girl who came to 
college clinging to her childhood faith, and lost it in the blaze of the Enlightenment. He’d like to 
be describing real persons—people like you and me. But personally, I’d much rather have the 
child-like faith that our Lord had in mind when He said: “Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall 
not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein” (Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17).
Ted Kyle
Related:
Marcus Borg – A Key Force in the Emerging “New Paradigm” of Christian Faith