DALLAS, TEXAS: PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN RALLY SPEECH TO MASSIVE CROWDS
Friday, October 18, 2019
NEW HOLLAND, LANCASTER, PA: SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVES ELIMINATION OF MALE/FEMALE LOCKER ROOMS FOR NON-GENDER SPECIFIC FACILITIES
VIDEO:
NEW HOLLAND, LANCASTER, PA: SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVES ELIMINATION OF MALE/FEMALE LOCKER ROOMS FOR NON-GENDER SPECIFIC FACILITIES
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
NEW HOLLAND, Penn. (Fox 32) – The Eastern Lancaster County School District voted Monday to initiate an ambitious renovation plan to create non-gender specific facilities at its high school in place of traditional gender-specific locker rooms.
Board members unanimously passed policy 253 on Monday night, the first student day of the 2019-2020 school year.The $2.4 million renovation plan for Garden Spot High School includes the design of four “zones” that will hold a total of 48 private changing rooms and 76 private showers, Lancaster Online reported. Because each of the showers will be private, they can also double as changing rooms, making a total of 124 changing rooms under the new plan.The Bible teaches in Genesis 5:1-2, “This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.”Jesus said in Matthew 19:4-5, “…Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?”______________________________________________________SEE ALSO: Elanco Superintendent Bob Hollister presents a new locker room design at Garden Spot High School on Monday, Oct. 14, 2019:Elanco's $2.4M locker room plan features non-
gender-specific changing areas, showers
FRANCE: MUSLIMAS WHO TRIED TO BLOW UP NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL GET 25 YEARS IN PRISON
FRANCE: MUSLIMAS WHO TRIED TO BLOW UP NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL GET 25 YEARS IN PRISON
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“Madani was arrested with two other members of the terrorist cell as they carried out a knife attack on a police officer.”Her jihad is persistent and relentless. What will she be like after 10 or 12 years in prison (if that) going to the five daily prayers, studying her Qur’an, and interacting with other Muslim prisoners? She will become a loyal, productive member of French society, right?“2 members of all-female Islamic terrorist cell sentenced to 25+ years for botched Notre Dame bombing,” RT, October 15, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):Two French members of an all-female Islamic terror group linked to ISIS have been sentenced to over 25 years in prison each for their failed attempt to blow up Notre Dame cathedral with a car packed full of gas cylinders.Inès Madani and Ornella Gilligmann received 30 and 25 years in prison, respectively, on Monday after a French court found them guilty of the September 4, 2016 plot to blow up Notre Dame which prosecutors claimed would have killed at least 60 people if it had been successful.The pair packed Madani’s father’s car with seven gas cylinders, doused it with diesel fuel, and attempted to set it on fire with a lit cigarette. Luckily for dozens of people sitting in a nearby bar, the improvised car-bomb did not detonate – diesel is not particularly flammable – and they ran away, though it did not take long for police to track them down. Giligmann was arrested two days later trying to flee the country with her family, while Madani was arrested with two other members of the terrorist cell as they carried out a knife attack on a police officer, planned with the help of the group’s mentor.The jihadi women were inspired and loosely guided by Rachid Kassim, an Islamic State (ISIS, formerly ISIL) terrorist who had released a guide for prospective jihadists on how to commit attacks that included the gas cylinder method. Madani and Gilligan joined a Telegram channel operated by Kassim and sent him videos pledging allegiance to ISIS, as well as a video claiming responsibility for the Notre Dame attack before it failed….
BRITISH MUSLIMS DEMAND REMOVAL OF BBC DOCUMENTARY ON ISLAMIC SEX TRAFFICKING IN IRAQ
BRITISH MUSLIMS DEMAND REMOVAL
OF BBC DOCUMENTARY ON ISLAMIC
SEX TRAFFICKING IN IRAQ
The BBC recently broadcasted a documentary titled "Undercover with the Clerics: Iraq's Secret Sex Trade." The program focused on Iraqi religious leaders who are turning young Muslim women and girls into prostitutes, convincing them to practice "nikah mut'ah" (pleasure marriage or temporary marriage). Shockingly, British Muslims posted a change.org petition demanding that the BBC remove the documentary, claiming that it is disrespectful to Shia Muslims and that it will spread Islamophobia. Should the BBC comply? David Wood discusses the issue.
TESTIMONY: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ORCHESTRATED UKRAINE PROSECUTOR'S REMOVAL
TESTIMONY: OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ORCHESTRATED UKRAINE PROSECUTOR'S REMOVAL
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s claims of innocence in the Biden-Burisma scandal just took another blow.This time, the truth came from a high-ranking official in the State Department. He told Congress on Tuesday that the Obama Administration arranged the sacking of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the energy company that employed Biden’s son.Vice President Joe Biden, then managing Ukraine affairs for Obama, was the button man.He famously told Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin — or else.Yet Joe and Hunter Biden claim the younger Biden’s business interests in Ukraine were unrelated to Biden senior’s diplomatic wet work, and that the United States was just going along with other countries.Not quite right, says the man from State.Get Rid of Him The latest on the Biden-Burisma intrigue comes once again from The Federalist’s Sean Davis.On Tuesday, a source told Davis, George Kent, deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, offered testimony that “directly contradicts claims that the Obama administration was merely following the lead of the so-called international community in demanding the firing” of Shokin.Shokin, recall, was probing Burisma Holdings, an energy company that for some inexplicable reason put Hunter Biden, a known drug addict kicked out of the Navy for cocaine use, on its board. Young Biden had zero experience in the energy business.In March 2016, Joe Biden targeted Shokin. The weapon? $1 billion in loan guarantees. As Biden bragged during an event sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, “I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.”“I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a b**ch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”That story resurfaced thanks to Trump’s asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during their now-famous phone call, to probe Biden-Burisma. Supposedly, Trump sought “foreign interference” in urging Zelensky and Ukraine to take out Biden by revealing his role in the Shokin hit.Biden claims he and his son “did nothing wrong,” that Shokin was fired not just because of the United States but also because other countries wanted him out, too.But in the secret House Intelligence Committee hearings on impeachment on Tuesday, Kent said “the Obama administration spearheaded the efforts to have Shokin removed from his position as the top federal prosecutor in Ukraine,” Davis reported. Continued Davis, “Kent said the international community — namely the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Western nations within the European Union — were deferential to U.S. directives on the matter.”In other words, claims that the Obama administration was merely following the lead of others is nonsense.As well, Davis reported:Kent also testified that concerns about corruption within Burisma, where Hunter Biden inexplicably served as a highly paid board member for five years, were openly voiced long before Trump became president. According to Kent, he personally raised red flags about a 2016 initiative between the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and Burisma due to concerns the company was tied to government corruption in the country. Kent testified that USAID was gearing up for an event with Burisma that involved children, and that he felt uncomfortable seeing children used as photo op props for a company with a reputation for corruption and graft.The Facts on Biden-Burisma Kent’s revelation that the Obama administration orchestrated Shokin’s removal comports with other facts about Biden-Burisma:• Ukraine re-opened the Burisma case before Trump’s call.• Burisma’s legal and public relations team apologized for the claims that Shokin was corrupt.• The claim that Biden couldn’t have pushed Poroshenko to fire Shokin because the Burisma probe had ended is false.• Shokin testified in court documents that “I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings ... Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors.”• The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee colluded with Ukrainians to sink Trump in 2016 by connecting Trump to Russia through Ukraine.• The Obama administration not only knee-capped Shokin, but also blocked a probe into the misuse of U.S. anti-corruption aid and an anti-corruption group backed by the administration and billionaire subversive George Soros, who backed Hillary Clinton.Despite those facts, Biden’s media protectorate insists “there is no evidence” of wrongdoing.
US SUPREME COURT: TEACHER WHO FORCED STUDENT TO SAY ISLAMIC CONVERSION PRAYER DID NOT VIOLATE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
US SUPREME COURT: TEACHER WHO FORCED STUDENT TO SAY ISLAMIC CONVERSION PRAYER
DID NOT VIOLATE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Parents take note: the Islamization of the education system needs to be firmly rejected, but that is not happening. Instead, parents are continuing to entrust their children to a system that is untrustworthy.“Public schools across America are promoting the religion of Islam in ways that would never be tolerated for Christianity or any other religion.” This is the warning from the chief counsel for the Thomas More Law Center, Richard Thompson. The warning stems from an alarming case in which the US Supreme Court “declined to take the case of a public school teacher who required her students to recite the Islamic ‘conversion prayer’ or receive a failing grade.” The school is La Plata High School in La Plata, Maryland.A student of that school, Caleigh Wood, who was in the 11th grade (i.e., around 16 years old) was placed under the extreme strain of having to challenge the authority of a teacher and defend herself by refusing “to deny her faith by making a written profession of the Muslim conversion prayer known as the shahada – ‘There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.‘” Caleigh stood up to what amounted to efforts at a forced conversion in an American school, and the court saw no problem with it.The Thomas More Law Center defended Caleigh, but the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the teacher “did not violate the Establishment Clause.”There is more: “Wood also had been forced to view a series of Islam-promoting PowerPoint slides, including one casting aspersions on Christians that said, Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.”Thompson said he was “not aware of any public school which has forced a Muslim student to write the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16: ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son…”Parents need to be actively involved in their children’s education and know what their children are being taught in schools, since many are now being subjected to Islamic indoctrination which encompasses the rejection of their own faith; other children are being taught that Islam is inherently a religion of peace.Author William Kilpatrick wrote in his article “Islamization in the Schools“:While jihadists across the globe are busy slitting throats, American school children are taught that jihad is an “inner struggle” and Islam means “peace.” While Muslim rape gangs destroy the lives of teenage girls in England, American teenagers learn that Muhammad was a champion of women’s rights. And although American students are taught all the gruesome details of the Atlantic slave trade, they learn little if anything about the Arab slave trade which took many more lives.”Western society is also being conditioned to believe that to challenge Islamization means that you are “Islamophobic” and/or bigoted, and that such discussions will only enrage Muslims. If the starting point of conversations about righteous anger over global abuses in the name of Islam is that Muslims will be enraged, then democracy is not in the interests of those who are enraged, and this is telling.Six months ago, Jihad Watch also reported about a Washington school district that was promoting Islam “through a Ramadan policy that provides special privileges for Muslim students.” The Northshore School District in Bothell involved CAIR, which suggested “various changes in policy and practice that would benefit Muslim students,” but fortunately a legal team “dispatched a cease-and-desist letter” from the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund.This demonstrates more of what parents are up against: CAIR suggested that a new Ramadan policy direct teachers to “create ‘safe spaces’ for Muslims, plan with Muslim students to let them ‘quietly slip away’ from class for prayer, ‘privately offer information’ about nutrition during their Ramadan fast, give ‘a lesson’ on Ramadan and privately ask Muslim students what accommodations they want.” All that is coming to a public school near you.“Supremes have no problem with teacher forcing Christian student to voice Islamic prayer,” World Net Daily, October 15, 2019:____________________________________________________________ OUR PREVIOUS POST:The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take the case of a public school teacher who required her students to recite the Islamic “conversion prayer” or receive a failing grade.The Thomas More Law Center is defending Caleigh Wood, a Christian student in 11th grade at La Plata High School in La Plata, Maryland.Wood refused to deny her faith “by making a written profession of the Muslim conversion prayer known as the shahada – ‘There is no god by allah and Muhammad is the messenger of allah,'” Thomas More said.The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the teacher did not violate the Establishment Clause.Wood also had been forced to view a series of Islam-promoting PowerPoint slides, including one casting aspersions on Christians that said, “Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.”The teacher’s actions were condemned in court by the high school’s content specialist, Jack Tuttle.Richard Thompson, Thomas More’s chief counsel, said he’s “not aware of any public school which has forced a Muslim student to write the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16: ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.'”“Yet, under the pretext of teaching history or social studies, public schools across America are promoting the religion of Islam in ways that would never be tolerated for Christianity or any other religion,” he said. “It’s disappointing that the Supreme Court did not take this opportunity to clarify the test which lower courts should use when ruling on establishment clause and free speech challenges to public school classes on religion.”Thomas More contends the school violated the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Speech clauses when it ordered Wood to do an assignment that she could not complete without violating her Christian beliefs……Thursday, May 23, 2019
LA PLATA, MARYLAND SCHOOL DENIGRATES CHRISTIANITY, PROMOTES ISLAM~CASE GONE TO THE SUPREME COURT
LA PLATA, MARYLAND SCHOOL DENIGRATES CHRISTIANITY, PROMOTES ISLAM~CASE GONE TO THE SUPREME COURTBY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMSrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:A taxpayer funded public school in Maryland instructed its students:“Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.”“Islam at heart is a peaceful religion.”Jihad is a “personal struggle in devotion to Islam, especially involving spiritual discipline.”“To Muslims, Allah is the same God that is worshiped in Christianity and Judaism.”“Men are the managers of the affairs of women” and “Righteous women are therefore obedient.”Imagine the shock when 11th-grader at La Plata High School, Caleigh Wood, revealed this to her parents. More students and more parents need to actively need to get involved as Caleigh Wood did. She bravely stood up for her rights as a Christian. She stated that, as part of an assignment, she “was also required to profess in writing, the Islamic conversion creed, ‘There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.’” For refusing to concede to the sharia and standing “firm in her Christian beliefs”, Wood was punished for it and given a failing grade for non-compliance.Her case has now gone to the supreme court. “The Thomas More Law Center has submitted a petition asking the high court to take up the case of student Caleigh Wood.” Its president, Richard Thompson warned:Under the guise of teaching history or social studies, public schools across America are promoting the religion of Islam in ways that would never be tolerated for Christianity or any other religion.Jihad Watch reported on May 19th that a Washington school district was caught promoting Islam for Ramadan through a CAIR initiative. Now lawyers have sent a cease and desist letter. Islamization happens rapidly if unnoticed and unchallenged. Parents need to be paying attention to what their children are being indoctrinated with and taught in schools.“U.S. SCHOOL FAILS CHRISTIAN STUDENT FOR REFUSING ISLAMIC PRAYER”, World Net Daily, May 19, 2019:______________________________________________________________ SEE ALSO: https://clarionproject.org/father-banned-high-school-after-islam-lesson- dispute-50/The declarations could have been made by an imam in a mosque sermon.“Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.”“Islam at heart is a peaceful religion.”Jihad is a “personal struggle in devotion to Islam, especially involving spiritual discipline.”“To Muslims, Allah is the same God that is worshiped in Christianity and Judaism.”“Men are the managers of the affairs of women” and “Righteous women are therefore obedient.”The problem is that those statements were part of the instruction in a public school in Maryland, and one of the students in the classroom now is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to condemn such religious lessons funded by taxpayers.The Thomas More Law Center has submitted a petition asking the high court to take up the case of student Caleigh Wood.“As a Christian and 11th-grader at La Plata High School in Maryland, Caleigh Wood was taught that ‘Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.’ She was also required to profess in writing, the Islamic conversion creed, ‘There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.’ Ms. Wood believed that it is a sin to profess by word or in writing, that there is any other god except the Christian God. She stood firm in her Christian beliefs and was punished for it. The school refused her request to opt-out or give her an alternative assignment. She refused to complete her anti-Christian assignment and consequently received a failing grade,” the legal team explained Wednesday.Lower courts have given a free pass to the school district to teach Islam, and so TMLC filed the request with the Supreme Court to decide “whether any legal basis exists to allow public schools to discriminate against Christianity while at the same time promote Islam.”“Under the guise of teaching history or social studies, public schools across America are promoting the religion of Islam in ways that would never be tolerated for Christianity or any other religion,” said Richard Thompson, TMLC’s president.“I’m not aware of any school which has forced a Muslim student to write the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16: ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life,’” he said.“Many public schools have become a hot bed of Islamic propaganda. Teaching Islam in schools has gone far beyond a basic history lesson. Prompted by zealous Islamic activism and emboldened by confusing court decisions, schools are now bending over backwards to promote Islam while at the same time denigrate Christianity. We are asking the Supreme Court to provide the necessary legal guidance to resolve the insidious discrimination against Christians in our public schools,” he said.Unresolved include whether or not schools can make preferential statements about one religion over another, and whether students may be required to assert religious beliefs with which they disagree.And how do those concepts align with “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”?The Charles County public schools and officials are defendants.The filing explains the lower courts, despite the First Amendment’s requirements, “upheld the ability for [the school] to denigrate Petitioner Caleigh Wood’s faith and require her to write out statements and prayers contradictory to her own religious beliefs.”….How Not To Teach Islam In A Maryland High School (Part II)
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/05/how-not-to-teach-islam-in-a-
maryland-high-school-part-ii; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:Students in high school at La Plata, Maryland were forced to write out Islam’s Profession of Faith, the Shahada. They were also instructed that the faith of Muslims is “stronger” than that of the average Christian.“ But that is not all — though that is more than enough to trigger a lawsuit by the Thomas More Law Center — that the high school students had to endure.Using a Powerpoint presentation in the class, the students at the school were also taught:“”Islam is a peaceful religion.”Comment:Islam is not a “peaceful religion.” It began in war, with Muhammad fighting in dozens of military campaigns to subdue non-Muslims in the Arabian peninsula. It continued to spread through war, ie. violent Jihad, throughout the Middle East and North Africa during the first century of its existence. War has been the primary means for the spread of Islam over its entire 1,400 history. There has never been a time when, somewhere in the world, Jihad has not been waged. Islam is “peaceful” only once it has conquered a land, and subjugated its inhabitants. These inhabitants who are then offered–if they are “People of the Book” (Christians and Jews), or are treated like them (as ultimately happened to both Zoroastrians and Hindus)–the three options of: death, conversion to Islam, or permanent status as tolerated dhimmis. Those dhimmis may remain alive, and practice their own religion, as long as they fulfill a series of onerous conditions, the most important of which was payment of the Jizyah, a burdensome tax paid by non-Muslims to the Muslim state, so as to be “protected” from the Muslims themselves. In this Introduction to Islam for high-schoolers in La Plata, apparently neither the dhimmi, nor the Jizyah, was discussed.“Jihad is a “personal struggle in devotion to Islam, especially involving spiritual discipline.”The primary meaning of Jihad is not that of a “personal struggle,” though this is a favorite claim of Muslim apologists, who are fond of quoting a single weak Hadith, not found in any of the most reliable Hadith collections, in which Muhammad, returning home from a military campaign, says that he is returning from the Lesser Jihad (of war) to the Greater Jihad of domestic life, requiring the spiritual discipline that everyday existence demands. Against that single Hadith, there are 109 Qur’anic verses that command Muslims to wage violent Jihad — Holy War — against the Infidels. Did the teacher not think to look into any of those Qur’anic verses about that kind of Jihad — e.g., 2:191-193; 3:151, 8:12, 8:60, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4? Does the teacher really think that when the Islamic State, Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Nusra Front, Al-Shebaab, Boko Haram, and many similar Muslim groups, all declare they are waging Jihad, that what they have in mind is a “personal struggle…involving spiritual discipline’?“To Muslims, Allah is the same God that is worshiped in Christianity and Judaism.”This is a mendacious attempt to make Allah seem familiar and acceptable to Christians and Jews; the word itself, we are supposed to believe, is simply another name for the “same God.” But Allah is very different from the God of the Christians or Yahweh of the Jews. Among the differences are these, taken from a Christian website:In Christianity,God’s only begotten Son is Jesus. Allah has no begotten son.God made salvation available by sacrificing His Son and promises salvation by grace to those who believe. Allah sacrificed nothing, and only saves if sufficient works are done.God has a payment for sins—Jesus Christ. Allah has no payment for sins.God’s Christ paid for the sins of mankind. Allah paid for nothing, and all men pay for their own sins.God’s salvation is through Christ’s work. Allah’s salvation is through people’s works.God’s saving work is, “Come to Christ.” The major part of Moslem salvation is to believe Mohammed was the sum and seal of the prophets.God’s book is very different from Allah’s book. They contradict each other, so they cannot both be true. For example, the Bible says Christ was resurrected from the dead. The Moslems reject that as a lie.God says his Son is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Allah says Christ is “only a messenger.”God treats men and women equally. Allah does not.God says marriages today (Christian) are to be monogamous. Allah allows more than one wife.There is no marriage in God’s Paradise. Faithful men get many virgins in Allah’s paradise..“Men are the managers of the affairs of women” and “Righteous women are therefore obedient.”Comment:This last remark — about men as managers of the affairs of women –is one of the very few remarks mentioned in the high school classes about Islam that accurately conveys what the Qur’an teaches. See Qur’an 4:34, where men are described as managing the affairs of women. And note that the lesson includes the remark that “righteous women are therefore obedient” but no mention is made that there is a corollary to this statement, to be found in Qur’an 4:34: a Muslim husband is in that verse given the right to “beat” his wife (or wives), if he merely suspects her of disobedience. That, of course, was not mentioned in the unit on Islam at La Plata high school.Furthermore, the reason men are “managers” of the affairs of women is explained by Muhammad in a Hadith where he describes “the deficiency of their [women’s] intelligence.” This Hadith was not mentioned by the high school teacher; apparently the students were simply meant to memorize that Islamic teaching — about men being the managers of women –without being provided with the textual justification from Muhmmd. His reason – the “deficiency of their [women’s] intelligence” –would be too offensive for the students, and has thus been deliberately left unsaid.“Many public schools have become a hotbed of Islamic propaganda,” Thompson [President of the Thomas More Law Center] continued.“Teaching Islam in schools has gone far beyond a basic history lesson. Prompted by zealous Islamic activism and emboldened by confusing court decisions, schools are now bending over backward to promote Islam while at the same time denigrate [sic] Christianity.”“We are asking the Supreme Court to provide the necessary legal guidance to resolve the insidious discrimination against Christians in our public schools,” he concluded.Despite two rulings against it in lower courts, the Thomas More Law Center should prevail when the case comes before the Supreme Court. The public schools in La Plata, Maryland have favored Islam in such a blatant way, clearly violating the Establishment Clause. It is one thing to tell students that conversion to Islam requires only that one recite the Profession of Faith, without knowing anything else about Islam, and then passing out a sheet so that they can read the Shahada for themselves. Muslims were so eager to make converts, to swell their numbers, that they didn’t care what converts knew at the time. That is permissible. But it is quite another thing to force students to write out the Shahada themselves, which is a way of propagandizing for the faith, no doubt leading some of them to think, excitedly, “Gosh, now I really could be a Muslim.” The President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, Richard Thompson, said in a statement. “I’m not aware of any school which has forced a Muslim student to write the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16: ‘For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.'”Thompson’s point is devastating and unanswerable. The public schools should not be promoting Islam by asking students to write out the Shahada. And they should also not be favoring Islam over all other faiths by disseminating misinformation — propaganda –about Islam. When the public school teachers and administrators in La Plata, Maryland teach students that “Islam is a peaceful religion,” they are ignoring 1,400 years of violent jihad. When the teachers instruct their students that “Jihad is a personal struggle…involving personal discipline” they are ignoring the 109 Qur’an verses commanding violent Jihad, and relying on a single weak Hadith. When the students are told that there is no difference between the Muslim Allah and the Christian God, they are being asked to ignore the Christian belief, ferociously rejected by Muslims, that Christ is the Son of God. They are also being asked to overlook the violence and ferocity rightly associated with Allah in the Qur’an, so different from the Christian God’s message of peace, love, and compassion.There may be a way to teach American students about Islam. But if the reality of Islam is to be accurately conveyed, it is hard to see what, beyond the Five Pillars, can be truthfully taught. without considerable trouble. In today’s supercharged political atmosphere, CAIR and other Muslims will be watching to see if there is anything they deem untoward — that is, negative — being taught about Islam. They will try to insist that teachers offer the sanitized version of Islam that CAIR has been so adept at spreading.They will be quick to cry “Islamophobia” and “racism” if there is any deviation from the version of Islam they wish to have presented. And even if there are suits by the Thomas More Law Center that ultimately prevail, the time and expense spent on fighting CAIR over this or that program on Islam may make many schools not eager to teach about Islam at all. And if Islam is not to be taught, then other religions cannot be either, lest the schools run afoul of the Establishment Clause. Perhaps, since there seems little prospect of being allowed to teach the truth about Islam in our schools, it would be best to leave the subject out of the curriculum altogether. The study of comparative religion can be taken up at a later date, at the university level. It is harder for the CAIRS of this world to intimidate those college professors whose work focuses on Islam (but are neither Muslims nor cheerleaders for the faith), and who are more likely to stand their ground, than it is for them to frighten public high school teachers and administrators, who likely do not know enough about Islam to defend themselves from those devastating charges of “Islamophobia” and “racism.”______________________________________________________________SEE ALSO:http://the-trumpet-online.com/supremes-have-no-problem-with-teacher-forcing-christian-student-to-voice-islamic-prayer/
%2Farc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-sltrib.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2F2SKIGP376ZFYFEF5XL4U7UZCNI.jpg&f=1)
DAVID CLOUD'S "WAY OF LIFE" RECENT ARTICLES
POPE TOLD JOURNALIST JESUS NOT GOD
AND THERE IS NO HELL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Friday Church News Notes, October 18, 2019,www.wayoflife.org, fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) - The following is excerpted from “Scalfari: Pope ‘Francis Told Me That Jesus Incarnate Was ‘a Man,” CNSNews.com, Oct. 9, 2019: “In the latest edition of La Repubblica, Pope Francis’ longtime atheist friend and interviewer, Eugenio Scalfari, claims that the Pope told him that once Jesus Christ became incarnate, he was a man, a ‘man of exceptional virtues’ but ‘not at all a God.’ The teaching of the Catholic Church and most Christian churches is that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was incarnated as fully man and fully God. ... According to the highly respected Catholic blog, Rorate Caeli, and Radio Spada in Italy, Scalfari states in the Oct. 9 edition of La Repubblica (behind paywall) the following: ‘Those who, as it has happened many times with me, have had the luck of meeting him and speaking to him with the greatest cultural intimacy, know that Pope Francis conceives Christ as Jesus of Nazareth, man, not God incarnate. Once incarnate, Jesus stops being a God and becomes a man until his death on the cross.’ ... In a March 2018 interview with Scalfari, Pope Francis reportedly said, ‘There is no Hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.’ ... The Pope himself never denied what Scalfari reported and the article never ran a correction or removed the article from its website.”
_____________________________________________________
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY COMMITTED TO HELPING HOMOSEXUALS DEVELOP THEIR SEXUALITY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Friday Church News Notes, October 18, 2019, www.wayoflife.orgfbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) - The following is excepted from “Baylor University Says They Are Committed,” reformationcharlotte, Sept. 3, 2019: “Baylor, a private Christian university located in Waco, Texas, is known as the largest Baptist university in the world with approximately 17,200 students on its 1,000-acre campus and is affiliated with the Texas Baptist Convention, which is subsequently connected to the Southern Baptist Convention. Baylor launched a website on sexuality last week which appears to take a softening stance on homosexuality. The website states that it is ‘committed to providing a caring, loving and supportive community for students in all aspects of their lives, including the development of their sexuality.’ ... ‘We acknowledge the complexity of issues surrounding human sexuality and desire to engage in this conversation with humility, prayerfulness and convicted civility.’ One can only ask, what is so complex about it? Homosexuality is a result of the fall and homosexual desire, identity, and activity is an abomination to God. Yet, the school is intent on offering support services to those who identify as LGBTQP+. The university president, Linda Livingstone, announced in a letter to students, faculty, and staff that students would not be disciplined for identifying as LGBTQ and that the university would provide resources for LGBTQ students through the Title IX Office, Bias Response Team, Chaplain’s Office and Spiritual Life, and the Counseling Center. ... In 2015, Baylor removed language from their code of conduct that characterized homosexual acts as ‘misuses of God’s gifts.’”