THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
MAFIA STYLE CONFRONTATION "Fredo" Cuomo: "I'm an anchor on CNN; I can handle things; I'm smart" "I WANT RESPECT"
"I KNOW IT WAS YOU, FREDO; YOU BROKE MY HEART":
The Godfather II - Michael talks with Fredo
CNN’s CHRIS CUOMO HAS A COMPLETE & TOTAL MELTDOWN OVER STRANGER CALLING HIM "FREDO" IN A RESTAURANT~REFERENCE TO "GODFATHER" MOVIE OFFENDS THIS ITALIAN FAKE NEWS GUY CORLEONE FAMILY SNITCH?
CAUTION: OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE:
Cuomo Threatens Man Who Called Him Fredo
At Dinner; Says He'll Throw Him Down Stairs
Trump: "Cuomo Was an Out Of Control Animal"; "I Would Not Have Wanted to See a Weapon in His Hand"
Would Chris Cuomo be given a Red Flag for his recent rant? Filthy language and a total loss of control. He shouldn’t be allowed to have any weapon. He’s nuts!
AGENDA 2030: THE NEXT "GREAT LEAP FORWARD"-BEHIND THE DEEP STATE
In this episode of Behind the Deep State, host Alex Newman exposes the "environmental friendly" plan that is Agenda 2030. On the surface, it looks like an attempt to help preserve the planet, but to make it work, major radical changes are going to be required for it to work. Newman lists these changes, which would result in less money for the general public, more U.N. control, controlling means of production, as well as mass starvation.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Anti-Israel activist Rasha Mubarak has been moving quickly up the ranks within the Democratic Party. In the past four months, she has been: named to the Board of Directors of the Florida Young Democrats (FYD), elected FYD National Committeewoman, and given the award for ‘Florida Young Democrat of the Year.’ Now, she has been appointed by the Mayor of Orlando to his new Committee on Multicultural Affairs. However, a recent FrontPage Magazine article by this author exposing Mubarak’s radical behavior against Jews may have, at least temporarily, hindered her momentum, as according to Mubarak, she was forced to do “damage control.”
Rasha Ahmad Mubarak has one main goal in life and that is to destroy Israel. To do this: she joins Hamas-linked groups, such as CAIR and Islamic Relief; she leads hate-filled, anti-Israel rallies; and she attaches herself to the Democratic Party, painting herself as a Progressive, while using the Party to attack the Jewish state. Indeed, Mubarak was just a speaker at the 2019 national convention of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), where provocative issues, such as open borders and the Green New Deal, were being adopted and where, in front of the audience, Mubarak branded Israel’s government “repressive” and “anti-Democratic.”
In December 2017, Mubarak organized the ‘HANDS OFF JERUSALEM RALLY FOR PALESTINE,’ co-sponsored by CAIR, the Young Democrats of Orange County (YDOC), which Mubarak was President of at the time, and the Seminole County Young Democrats (SCYD). A video from the rally caught Mubarak’s uncle, Orlando real estate investor Said Lutfi, referring to Jews as “the crappiest piece of s**t on this planet,” “baby killers” and “Jesus killers.” In September 2018, Mubarak did a live streamed video with then-FYD President Jake Sanders to discuss BDS, the bigoted movement to boycott Israel.
Mubarak’s rhetoric towards Jews is no less troubling. This past May, when Hamas launched more than 600 rockets into Israel, leading to the deaths of four civilians, Mubarak tweeted against anyone who would dare defend Israeli retaliation. In November 2012, she wrote on Twitter, “#LiesImTiredOfHearing Israel has the right to defend herself.” And at the end of the 2014 Israel-Gaza Conflict, along with photos of a jubilant Hamas, who had, bizarrely, just declared victory, Mubarak tweeted, “Thousands of people celebrating in the streets of Gaza for the victory. Alhamdulillah. #VictoryForGaza.”
In November 2014, Mubarak was a featured speaker at the Al-Awda 12th annual convention, held in Fort Lauderdale. Al-Awda, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, is a US-based activist group, which opposes Israel’s right to exist. Participating, along with Mubarak, were then-Chair of Al-Awda, Anas Amireh, who advocates Palestinians use cars as weapons and refers to Israel as the “Zionist enemy,” and then-Vice Chair of Al-Awda, Abbas Hamideh, who told Jews, in October 2015, “Rest assured Zionism will be eradicated and if you’re lucky you’ll be sent back to Europe where you belong...” Hamideh says peace with Israel only means “surrender.”
Much of the above was reported by this author, last month, in a FrontPage Magazine piece, titled, ‘ISLAMIST JEW-HATER NAMED FLORIDA YOUNG DEMOCRAT OF THE YEAR.’ It seems the information had a negative effect on Mubarak, as she wrote on social media, two days later, that she missed an important photo op, because she had to do “damage control” regarding what appears to be the article.
The photo op was a group photo for a new committee set up by Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer, Mayor Dyer’s Committee on Multicultural Affairs, which Mubarak and 16 others had been appointed to. Mubarak stated, “I missed the group photo – as I was dealing with damage control re: right wing racist and Islamophobic attacks.”
According to the City of Orlando official website, “This appointed committee is comprised of 17 community leaders that represent diversity in race, gender, age, religious beliefs, national origin, cultural background, profession, sexual orientation and gender identity.” Following the Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary, Mubarak is the fourth name on the website’s list of committee members. Surely, this was a significant honor for a fringe character like Mubarak. As for Mayor Dyer, he has no qualms about associating with radical Muslims.
Two years after Dyer became Mayor in 2003, he issued a letter of support for a May 2005 fundraising banquet CAIR was holding in Orlando, writing, “I… applaud your organization’s mission of enhancing communication among communities and offering a voice for Muslims in the United States.” The group was looking to raise money for the opening of an Orlando CAIR office and chapter. Years later, in September 2015, Mubarak would become the head of this chapter, replacing Ahmad Saleem, who had been arrested for soliciting sex from an individual he believed to be a 12-year-old girl.
As the Democratic Party has moved further to the left, criticism of Israel has become more acceptable within Party circles. Yet, Mubarak goes far beyond this criticism, attacking the Jewish homeland every chance she gets, drifting far into anti-Semitic territory by questioning Israel’s very right to defend herself (a prerequisite to Israel’s existence).
Are the Democratic Party and Buddy Dyer, who happens to be a Democrat himself, going to continue to ignore such obvious and dangerous bigotry and incitement? Will they continue to embrace Rasha Mubarak, as she uses them to legitimize her disturbing behavior?
Both the Democratic Party and Dyer must understand that, in doing so, they are not only embracing Mubarak, but they are also embracing the extreme hatred that goes along with her. Moreover, any idea of the Committee on Multicultural Affairs promoting diversity and “ensuring all residents feel welcomed, respected and accepted,” as the Mayor’s office states it does, will be rendered a despicable farce.
Beila Rabinowitz, Director of Militant Islam Monitor, contributed to this report.
FIRST DECEIVE THE MASSES; THEN IMPLEMENT A ONE WORLD RELIGION TYRANNY USING NEW AGE, MYSTICAL MANDATES, COUPLED WITH SOCIALISM & GLOBALISM THE PARLIAMENT OF WORLD RELIGIONS~WOMAN-YOU ARE A NEW AGE, UNIVERSALIST "PRIESTESS":
THE INTERSECTION OF SPIRITUALITY & POLITICS:
"SISTER GIANT", A MEETING OF LIBERALS, SOCIALISTS, GLOBALISTS
SISTER GIANT 2017 On February 2-4, 2017, Marianne partnered with Derrick Harkins, Vice President of Union Theological Seminary, to host the 4th SISTER GIANT conference — live in Washington DC and via Livestream — which explored the intersection of spirituality and politics. Marianne was joined by Senator Bernie Sanders, and a host of experts speaking on the most critical spiritual and political issues of our day.
Marianne Williamson on Spirituality and
Politics~Learning From Ghandi?
Love & Non-Violence?
Except for Those Christians Who Resist
SEE THE "PEACE DEPARTMENT" PLAN BELOW
MARIANNE WILLIAMSON REVEALS THE DEMOCRATS ARE A CULT
How Hillary's seances led to the rise of the Left's
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
How did Marianne Williamson, the author of 21 Spiritual Lessons for Surrendering Your Weight Forever, and other stuff you might see on the bottom layer of a garage sale, end up on the 2020 debate stage?
The obvious answer is that she’s been there for a very long time.
Lefties love to claim that they’re the movement that believes in science. But the Third Law of Thermodynamics isn’t something you believe in. Fermat’s Principle doesn’t give your life meaning.
Marianne teaching you spiritual lessons about weight loss on an episode of Oprah does.
Hillary Clinton held a séance in the White House. The seance overseen by Jean Houston, the author of The Hero and the Goddess: The Odyssey as Pathway to Personal Transformation, encouraged Hillary to contact Eleanor Roosevelt. Hillary and Houston hit it off after the Clintons invited self-help book authors to Camp David to help them cope with their defeat. The authors included Marianne Williamson.
Marianne Williamson had reportedly participated in some of Hillary’s White House seances.
Esquireclaimed that Hillary Clinton had met her at a fundraiser where the New Age guru made such an impression that she was invited to stay in the Lincoln Bedroom.
Where did Marianne Williamson come from? The White House and the Democrat Party.
Unlike Andrew Yang, Williamson isn’t a fringe character who somehow made it into the debate stage. When she ran for Congress, her backers included Dennis Kucinich, who told supporters, "You are the ones who are calling forward a reality by the name of Marianne Williamson", and Jennifer Granholm, the former Governor of Michigan, who headed a key Hillary SuperPAC.
Williamson is a crackpot, but her crackpottery fills the broken china closets of the Democrats. She got this far because the upper echelons of the Dems don’t believe in God, but do believe in crazy.
When Hillary Clinton wasn’t trying to commune with Eleanor and Gandhi, she appeared to share the obsession of John Podesta, her campaign chair, with UFOs. There was bafflement when former Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid was caught earmarking $22 million to study UFOs. Earlier this year, Reid claimed that there was a UFO race between Russia’s KGB (which no longer exists), China and America.
$10 million went to a Dem donor interested in UFOs who had written Harry $10,000 worth of checks.
The UFO research quickly took a dive into the paranormal, which, according to a senior manager included studying, "bizarre creatures, poltergeist activity, invisible entities." The reports were subcontracted to a research team led by a psychic espionage researcher.
Remind me again which party “believes” in science?
Democrats were twice as likely as Republicans to think that astrology is "very scientific". And the Democrats split equally down on the middle on whether astrology was or wasn't scientific.
Liberals were more likely to believe in astrology than conservatives. 43% of liberals believed that astrology was scientific, while only 26% of conservatives did. Only 48.6% of Democrats, compared to 62% of Republicans, were able to correctly answer that the earth revolves around the sun.
58% of Democrats compared to 37% of Republicans believe in UFOs. 35% of Democrats and 27% of Republicans believe they experienced the paranormal. 69% of Democrats, compared to 49% of Republicans, believe in ghosts.
That’s why Marianne Williamson is up there on the debate stage. The only surprise is that it took this long for an unabashed representative of what the Democrats really believe to finally show up.
At the 2020 debates, the Democrats are letting their leftist freak flag fly. They’re coming out of the closet about their support for taking away everyone’s health insurance, dismantling the border and freeing criminals. Why shouldn’t they come out of the closet about their New Age beliefs?
70% of Republicans believe in the God of the bible. Only 45% of Democrats do. 39% believe in some other power or spiritual force. 14% don't believe in any kind of higher power.
Spirituality. Auras. Energy forces. Karma. Battling dark psychic forces. Being attuned to the universe. They believe in, among other things, the founder of the Church of Today who lived in a commune, worked as a cabaret singer, ran a New Age bookstore, and became a fave of Oprah and Hillary Clinton.
"One sometimes gets the impression that the mere words 'Socialism' and 'Communism' draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, 'Nature Cure' quack, pacifist, and feminist in England," George Orwell wrote.
But do lefty politics draw in nuts and kooks for no apparent reason. Or is the insanity baked inside?
Are Marianne Wiilliamson’s crazy rants about dark psychic forces and force fields unrelated to her politics, or is the socialist conviction that the world needs careful management by the enlightened to cure us of our human nature exactly the sort of political philosophy that attracts quacks and kooks?
Behind the façade of reason, the light side of the Left, with its plans for a totalitarian utopia of resource management, speech policing, constant reeducation, and disposition of the unworthy, is a dark side of festering demons, spirits, ghosts, sorcerous powers, and invisible visitors from other realms. The light side claims that its ideas are the product of science, experts and modern thought, but the dark side is throbbing with magical thinking, hysterical outbursts, senseless cruelty, and cults of personality.
People don’t believe in what speaks to their conscious, but their unconscious.
The Left likes to claim that its plans come out of the light side, but history shows they originate in the dark. That’s why all the scientific plans never work out the way that they are meant to. The revolutions devolve into blood rituals. The economic plans fall into corruption and chaos. And when it’s done, masses of brutalized people wander in the shadows and wonder how all this could have happened.
The answer is that leftist politics only pretend to come from the conscious mind, but actually originate in the resentments, fantasies and terrors of the unconscious mind. Leftism isn’t reasoned, it’s rationalized.
Its politics are the wishes and the vendettas of the subconscious filtered through pseudoscience.
Marianne Williamson is unremarkable. After Trump’s election, tens of thousands of women like her swarmed the streets wearing pink hats to shriek at the sky and repel the dark psychic forces. This caucus of crazy white women, who underlie the leftist activist base, are spiritual rather than religious. They believe that they have special insight and are much too smart for organized religion. They are convinced that women are more spiritually attuned than men, that progressives are more sensitive than everyone else, and that they project spiritual forces through their activism that will change the country.
They believe in everything, ghosts, auras, energy forces, UFOs, and even angels, but no God.
That would be blasphemous because what they believe in, above all else, is themselves.
Marianne Williamson, like Obama and Oprah, speak to their inner specialness, to their egos and their conviction that they were put on earth to change the world and feel good about themselves. They assure them that all their inner conflicts can be resolved by directing their energy into politics and that they will be assured of immortality if their political activism puts them on the right side of history.
They are their own goddesses, their religion is narcissism, and the church is leftist politics.
Hillary Clinton, despite being one of them, never actually managed to speak to them. That’s one of the reasons why she lost. Even aside from Marianne Williamson, the 2020 field is full of Democrats trying out the rising cadences and long pauses of fake spirituality and impassioned vagueness. They use the borrowed poetry of religion to convey faith, but the only thing they believe in is themselves.
Williamson will lose this race. Just as she lost the race to represent Beverly Hills in Congress. But eventually the unofficial religion of the Democrat Party will get a guru as President of the United States. ________________________________________________________________
ONCE DECEIVED, YOU'LL BE IN BONDAGE & UNDER A ONE WORLD RELIGION TYRANNY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
New Age leader and activist Barbara Marx Hubbard has played an instrumental role with Marianne Williamson in efforts to bring about a Department of Peace in Washington, DC. Warren Smith discusses Marx Hubbard's work and the "selection process" to prepare the world for a new era of consciousness in his online book, Reinventing Jesus Christ Hubbard's book, Happy Birthday Planet Earth, she states:
Christ-consciousness and Christ-abilities are the natural inheritance of every human being on Earth. When the word of this hope has reached the nations, the end of this phase of evolution shall come. All will know their choice. All will be required to choose..... All who choose not to evolve will die off; their souls will begin again within a different planetary system which will serve as kindergarten for the transition from self-centered to whole-centered being. The kindergarten class of Earth will be over. Humankind's collective power is too great to be inherited by self-centered, infantile people." (Quoted by Let Us Reason)
New Age leader, Barbara Marx Hubbard has stated, "people will either change or die," for "that is the choice." According to those who would concur with Hubbard, Christians will need to be more open minded so they too can receive the mark of the Antichrist. If they will not join with the global community and its agenda, they will be killed by the "opened minded" New Agers. She states that, "This act is as horrible as killing a cancer cell. It must be done (or the sake of the future of the whole. So be it; be prepared for the selection process which is now beginning. We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow; something must be done before the whole body is destroyed.... The destructive one fourth must be eliminated from the social body."
In the following YouTube video, Barbara Marx Hubbard is speaking at the Democratic National Convention about a "citizens solutions council" which can "activate" and "mobilize" those who are working toward global consciousness and unity. This is not fringe edge - it is a reality, one that we believe will, at some point, intersect with the Purpose Driven three-legged stool and the emerging church. The common element - mysticism, which is the ground where all religious traditions come together and acknowlegde their common divinity within.It is New Age guru Neale Donald Walsch who stated: "The era of the Single Savior is over."This is where the "new spirituality" is heading - thus, let us continue defending the Gospel message of Jesus Christ.
"[T]here is no other name [Jesus Christ] under heaven given among men by which we must be saved." Acts 4: 12
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Starting early last Monday morning, President Trump began calling his supporters and other policymakers for advice on what to do following the Dayton and El Paso mass shootings.
He spoke several times with Wayne LaPierre, the chief executive officer of the National Rifle Association (NRA). On Thursday LaPierre issued a statement condemning the push for more gun controls, including expanded background checks to include private sales and congressional pressure urging states (along with promises of federal money) to adopt red flag laws. LaPierre stated:
I’m not inclined to discuss private conversations with President Trump or other key leaders on this issue. But I can confirm that the NRA opposes any legislation that unfairly infringes on the rights of law-abiding citizens.
The inconvenient truth is this: the proposals being discussed by many would not have prevented the horrific tragedies in El Paso and Dayton. Worse, they would make millions of law-abiding Americans less safe and less able to defend themselves and their loved ones.
LaPierre added: “The NRA will work in good faith to pursue real solutions to the epidemic of violence in America. But many proposals are nothing more than ‘soundbite solutions’ which fail to address the root of the problem, confront criminal behavior, or make our communities safer.”
The next day Trump’s Tweet appeared to indicate a softening of his stance that his administration had to do something, even if it risked losing critical support of his primary base: gun owners. He tweeted:
Serious discussions are taking place between House and Senate leadership on meaningful Background Checks. I have also been speaking to the NRA, and others, so that their very strong views can be fully represented and respected.
But he added:
Guns should not be placed in the hands of mentally ill or deranged people. I am the biggest Second Amendment person there is, but we all must work together for the good and safety of our Country. Common sense things can be done that are good [for] everyone.
This sounded like a repudiation of previous promises made by the president. He told his supporters at the recent NRA annual meeting, “Your Second Amendment rights are under siege. But they will never, ever be under siege as long as I am your president.”
Rush Limbaugh was quick to remind his listeners that another law wouldn’t change anything: “There’s not a single new law that would change anything. The only thing a new law would do is it would drive a wedge between Trump and his voters and the NRA. Because, make no mistake, they [anti-gun politicians] want your guns. They want every gun you’ve got as quickly as they can get it.”
John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the No. 3 Senate Republican said, “I have a lot of concerns about the due process component of [red flag laws] and I don’t want to punish law-abiding citizens.”
Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Second Amendment Foundation, said he was one of those the president had called during the week about a “range of ideas” following the mass shootings, including red flag laws and the resurrection of the 1994 Clinton ban of semi-automatic rifles. He said, based on his conversation with the president, that there is “no way” the White House would back such a resurrection: “There’s no justification for banning those because less than 1 percent ever get misused to start with. There are millions in civilians’ hands right now. What are you going to do, go door to door and confiscate them?”
Michael Hammond, legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America (GOA), described red flag laws as allowing “police to convene a Kafkaesque secret proceeding, in which an American can be stripped of his or her gun rights and Fourth Amendment rights, even though [they] are barred from participating in the hearings or arguing their side of the dispute.… If the Constitution can be suspended in a secret hearing, where does this lead?”
Matt Schlapp, a close ally of the president and head of the American Conservative Union (ACU), said, “I don’t think the president or his Republican allies are going to become … advocates of aggressive gun control.”
Neither does ferocious anti-gun Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) who admitted: “The question is, what difference can the federal government make in what is largely a state decision [on red flag laws]. I’m all for federal action on extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs). I’m just not sure it’s going to move the needle.”
Nor does the anti-gun New York Times. Said the paper, the president’s past “flip-flops” on background checks “raises questions about his real commitment to legislation that would improve the background check system.”
Liberal Politico agrees:
The odds of serious gun control legislation clearing Congress and being signed into law remain slim. [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell has shown no interest in the past; the same goes for his conference.
And the same pattern has played out over and over: a public outcry after a mass shooting, followed by hand-wringing among lawmakers for a few days or weeks, before the issue fades.
There are other more cerebral reasons that legislation being proposed is unlikely to gain purchase once the media-inspired angst quiets down. Judge Andrew Napolitano declared flat out that “red flag laws are unconstitutional," while Bryan Fischer (host of Focal Point on American Family Radio) claims that they put “your right to own a firearm into the hands of the American Psychological Association or the American Psychiatric Association, who will set the standard for the mental health community. No thanks.”
As the drumbeat for more infringements of the Second Amendment recedes with the passage of time, so do the chances of them coming to the front doors of American gun owners. The Second Amendment remains the “third rail” of American politics, and politicians, including the president, touch it at their own risk.
