TRUMP HOSTS SOCIAL MEDIA SUMMIT TO DISCUSS CENSORSHIP, BLOCKING, SHADOW BANNING OF CONSERVATIVE SPEECH
Twitter Caught Shadow-Banning During
Social Media Summit
Social Media Summit
Thursday, July 11, 2019
WARNER MOMENT: WHY WON'T MUSLIMS ASSIMILATE?
MAYBE BECAUSE THE KORAN DEMANDS CONQUEST & DOMINATION?
WARNER MOMENT: WHY WON'T MUSLIMS ASSIMILATE?
WARNER MOMENT: WHY WON'T MUSLIMS ASSIMILATE?
BY JAMIE GLAZOV
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This new edition of the Glazov Gang presents the Dr. Bill Warner Moment with Dr. Bill Warner,the president of politicalislam.com.Dr. Warner asks: Why Won’t Muslims Assimilate? and he unveils what Islamic doctrine teaches about migration, domination and annihilation.Don’t miss it!Please donate through our new Unified-4-People Campaign or via our Pay Pal account.Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.Order Jamie Glazov’s new book: Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us.
FACEBOOK ADOPTS NEW POLICY ALLOWING DEATH THREATS AGAINST "DANGEROUS INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS"; CODE WORDS FOR CONSERVATIVE, PATRIOTIC
FACEBOOK ADOPTS NEW POLICY ALLOWING DEATH THREATS AGAINST "DANGEROUS INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS"
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
And judging by Facebook’s treatment of foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others, they are likely to find themselves on the “Dangerous Individuals” list. This new policy incites the violent and hateful among Facebook’s 2 billion users to threaten to kill people whose points of view dissent from the Leftist agenda.The descent to fascist authoritarianism is swift, isn’t it?“Facebook Issues New Policy Saying It’s Acceptable to Post Death Threats Against Me,” by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News, July 9, 2019:Facebook has issued a new policy update saying it’s acceptable to post death threats and incite violence against me, despite this being a crime in the United Kingdom.No, I’m not joking.A Community Standards update published by Facebook states (emphasis mine); “Do not post: Threats that could lead to death (and other forms of high-severity violence) of any target(s) where threat is defined as any of the following:Statements of intent to commit high-severity violence; orCalls for high-severity violence (unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)….”Back in May, Facebook and Instagram banned me under the justification that I was a “dangerous individual”. They provided no evidence whatsoever that I had behaved in a “dangerous” manner or violated any of their policies.Facebook has designated me a “dangerous individual” and now says it’s acceptable for its users to issue death threats against me.This is a crime in the United Kingdom under the 1988 Malicious Communications Actwhich states, “Any person who sends to another person a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys….a threat….is guilty of an offence.”The largest social media company in the world with over 2 billion users literally says its fine to incite violence against me, despite this being illegal.They are painting a target on my back.Innumerable individuals have already sent death threats to me via Facebook….
THERE'S AN LGBTQ MOMENT LURKING IN "TOY STORY 4"
'Subtle, Oh So Subtle'; Toy Story 4 Quietly Introduce Lesbian Couple To Desensitize Children
THERE'S AN LGBTQ MOMENT LURKING IN "TOY STORY 4"
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
It may seem like nothing much, but an LGBTQ moment appears to have been included in the latest installment of the popular children’s Toy Story animated film franchise. Much like the micro-second “Popcorn” frames dropped surreptitiously into 1950s moves to subconsciously persuade theater patrons to make a visit to the concession stand, it seems that subtle same-sex domestic moments are being dropped into children’s videos in an effort to condition kids to accept homosexual behavior as normal — and even warm and cozy.
In a high-five to Pixar and Disney, the companies responsible for Toy Story 4, the editors at the UK’s Gay Times reported that while the latest installment of the adventures of Woody, Buzz Lightyear, and the rest of the Toy Story gang is “every bit as magical and visually impressive as we knew it would be, one thing we didn’t expect to see was LGBTQ characters, no matter how insignificant to the overall story they were.”
The pro-homosexual news site goes on to explain that at the very start of the film, “when Woody’s new owner Bonnie goes for her first day of kindergarten, there’s a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it scene where one child is dropped off by two moms. Later, the moms return to pick up their child and give them a hug.”
While the lesbian moment was “certainly not the major representation that queer people have been waiting for,” the news site continues, “it’s still important. This is one of the biggest movies of the year, after all, and will be seen by millions of all ages around the world.”
The example of pro-homosexual representation was so small that not even the eagle-eyed reviewers at MovieGuide caught it. The Christian, pro-family movie watchdog site gave Toy Story 4a resounding thumbs-up, applauding it for its “very strong Christian worldview, with overt self-sacrifice for the benefit of saving others, plus very strong moral elements, including an emphasis on loyalty, caring, relationships, with the villain being transformed by the redemptive self-sacrifice.”
It took the ladies at OneMillionMoms.com to warn parents of the lovable cartoon movie’s gratuitous LGBTQ moment. “The scene is subtle in order to desensitize children,” the moms observe. “But it is obvious that the child has two mothers, and they are parenting together.”
They go on to write that “many families probably plan on seeing this movie if they haven’t already, and will be blindsided by this subtle but obvious promotion of the LGBTQ lifestyle. Not to mention there was a brief comment made about not hiding in a closet also in the movie. Some children may not catch this reference, but it was extremely unnecessary as with the lesbian couple. Both were brief and didn’t need to be included since it didn’t add to the story plot at all. These ‘blink and you will miss’ moments were included strictly to push an agenda.”
The concerned mothers go on to note that “Toy Story 4 is the last place parents would expect their children to be confronted with content regarding sexual orientation. Issues of this nature are being introduced too early and too soon. It is extremely common yet unnecessary. Disney has decided once again to be politically correct versus providing family-friendly entertainment. Disney should stick to entertaining instead of pushing an agenda and exposing children to controversial topics.”
IRAN THREATENS TO STRIKE U.S. BASES & AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
IRAN THREATENS TO STRIKE U.S. BASES &
AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
BY WARREN MASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Iranian Minister of Cultural and Social Affairs Hossein Nejat issued a warning on July 9 that Iran can strike American bases in the Middle East and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers if the United States attacks Iran.
“American bases are within the range of our missiles.... Our missiles will destroy their aircraft carriers if they make a mistake,” Nejat warned. “Americans are very well aware of the consequences of a military confrontation with Iran.”On May 12, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of Aerospace Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard, said in response to the U.S. decision to deploy the USS Abraham Lincoln (shown) with Carrier Strike Group 12 and a bomber task force to the Middle East that the action has transformed the U.S. presence from a “serious threat” to “a target.”“An aircraft carrier that has at least 40 to 50 planes on it and 6,000 forces gathered within it was a serious threat for us in the past but now it is a target and the threats have switched to opportunities,” Hajizadeh said.A June 3 AP report said that the Abraham Lincoln remained outside the Persian Gulf. Officers aboard the carrier repeatedly told AP that they could respond rapidly to any regional threat from their position, at the time some 320 kilometers (200 miles) off the eastern coast of Oman in the Arabian Sea.“You don’t want to inadvertently escalate something,” Captain Putnam Browne, the commanding officer of the Lincoln, told the AP.When asked about why the Abraham Lincoln hadn’t gone through the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf, Rear Admiral John F.G. Wade, the commander of the carrier’s strike group, told journalists from the AP and other media outlets that his forces could “conduct my mission wherever and whenever needed.”There are greater advantages to stationing the Abraham Lincoln outside the Persian Gulf than not wanting to “escalate” the situation with Iran, however. The Gulf is a relatively small body of water immediately south of Iran, and a carrier group stationed there is not only a “target,” as Hajizadeh said, but a sitting duck.Kyle Mizokami, a defense and national security writer, explored whether Iran had the capability to sink a U.S. aircraft carrier in a May 8 article for The National Interest. Mizokami noted:There are many reasons to be skeptical about [Iranian] Admiral [Ali] Fadavi’s claim [that Iran is capable of sinking a U.S. aircraft carrier]. The first is that Iranian forces have a range problem. U.S. forces, particularly those on aircraft carriers, have a much greater operational range than Iranian forces. The longest-range Iranian coastal defense missile, the Ghader antiship cruise missile, has a range of 186 miles — less than half that of a F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. The same goes for Iranian air power, where Iranian warplanes and their weapons are outranged by American defenses. Major U.S. warships such as aircraft carriers can stay well out of range of Iranian forces and operate with impunity.However, just because we can operate with impunity near Iran doesn’t mean we should.Related articles: