Wednesday, August 1, 2018

"IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT 'ICE'": MICHELLE MALKIN SAYS DEMOCRATS WANT TO "ABOLISH EVERY LAST FOUNDING PRINCIPLE"

"IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT 'ICE'": 
MICHELLE MALKIN SAYS DEMOCRATS WANT TO "ABOLISH EVERY LAST FOUNDING PRINCIPLE"
As seen on Hannity CRTV host and author Michelle Malkin said she is proud that President Trump continues to fulfill promises he made to "forgotten" Americans, especially on border security and immigration.
THEY AGREE WITH TRUMP THAT GOVERNMENT MAY HAVE TO BE SHUT DOWN TO GET NEW BORDER PROTECTION & IMMIGRATION LAWS

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SUES SOUTH CAROLINA FOR ENDING MEDICAID FUNDING TO ABORTION FACILITIES


PLANNED PARENTHOOD SUES SOUTH CAROLINA FOR ENDING MEDICAID FUNDING TO ABORTION FACILITIES 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
COLUMBIA, S.C. — The sexually-centered abortion and contraception giant Planned Parenthood has filed a lawsuit against the State of South Carolina for ending Medicaid funding to entities that provide abortions.
“The executive order has forced PPSAT (Planned Parenthood South Atlantic) to stop providing basic preventative health services to the Medicaid patients who rely on us each year for family planning and other preventive health care. Every day that this continues, both PPSAT and our patients are irreparably harmed,” the organization said in a statement.
“We recognized it was critical to seek legal action to ensure that our patients who use Medicaid as their primary form of insurance can continue to seek care at Planned Parenthood, their trusted health care provider,” it remarked.
On July 13, Gov. Henry McMaster issued an order directing the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DDHS) to deem abortion facilities as being “unqualified to provide family planning services” and to cancel their enrollment in the state Medicaid program.
“[T]he payment of taxpayer funds to abortion clinics, for any purpose, results in the subsidy of abortion and the denial of the right to life,” the order reads. “[A]bortion clinics’ primary focus on denying the right to life is contrary to and conflicts with the State’s obligation to preserve and protect that right.”
It notes that last August, McMaster likewise directed DDHS to take steps to obtain a waiver from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in order to exclude abortion facilities from the program.
However, as negotiations are ongoing and CMS has not yet approved the waiver, McMaster vetoed the 2018-2019 family planning appropriation in the DDHS budget and rather directed the organization to expend the funds in a manner that only reimburses family planning entities that do not perform abortions.
“Taxpayer dollars must not directly or indirectly subsidize abortion providers like Planned Parenthood,” he said in his veto explanation. “There are a variety of agencies, clinics, and medical entities in South Carolina that receive taxpayer funding to offer important women’s health and family planning services without performing abortions.”
Last August, McMaster also ordered DDHS to create a publicly available list of women’s health and family planning offices operating within 25 miles of any abortion facility. There are three abortion facilities in the state, one of which is run by Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic consequently sued the State last week, along with one of its patrons, arguing that federal law prohibits the government from obstructing a person on Medicaid from using the provider of their choice.
The organization’s social media pages feature a number of sexually-related posts, including one posted on July 25 that reads, “Masturbating is totally healthy and normal. There are tons of myths out there meant to scare you into thinking masturbation is wrong or bad. But the truth is, solo sex is perfectly safe. In fact, it’s actually the safest way to experience sexual pleasure—there’s no risk of pregnancy or STDs. #selflove #feelinmyself #facts #health”
It also posted a graphic on June 13 that asserts, “Trans women are women.”
McMaster has vowed to fight the Planned Parenthood lawsuit “with everything he has.”
“Like millions of South Carolinians, [McMaster] believes in the fundamental right to life for unborn children and does not believe tax dollars should go to organizations that perform elective abortions,” spokesman Brian Symmes told the outlet The State.
“It is utterly laughable that Planned Parenthood claims poor women have nowhere else to turn for health services,” also opined Holly Gatling, executive director of South Carolina Citizens for Life. “There are numerous health clinics throughout South Carolina that offer high quality, comprehensive health care to women of childbearing age without peddling abortion as just another means of birth control.”
______________________________________________________________

SC Governor Vetoes Heath Care Money to Prevent Planned Parenthood Funding

50,000 MUSLIM MIGRANTS WAITING TO INVADE SPAIN

50,000 MUSLIM MIGRANTS WAITING TO INVADE SPAIN 
According to a report in Spanish newspaper El Mundo, North Africa is becoming a “pressure cooker,” with at least 50,000 African migrants desperate to cross into the European country via the Strait of Gibraltar.
IN ADDITION TO 20,000 OR MORE ALREADY IN SPAIN

AMERICA HAS MILLIONS OF MILLENNIAL BRATS THAT NEED TO MOVE AWAY FROM MOMMY AND DADDY AND START ACTING LIKE ADULTS

AMERICA HAS MILLIONS OF MILLENNIAL BRATS THAT NEED TO MOVE AWAY FROM MOMMY AND DADDY AND START ACTING 
LIKE ADULTS

Because our young people are not getting out on their own, a lot fewer of them are getting married and having children.

BY MICHAEL SNYDER- End Of The American Dream
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/america-has-millions-of-millennial-brats-that-need-to-move-away-from-mommy-and-daddy-and-start-acting-like-adults/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
If young adults are America’s future, then they better get their act together.
Today, over 30 percent of 18 to 34-year-olds live with their parents or other family members. Meanwhile, marriage rates and fertility rates in the United States have both hit record lows in recent years. Instead of coddling these self-absorbed Millennial narcissists well into their adult years, we need to be kicking them out of the nest and encouraging them to learn to fend for themselves. In many instances, if they do not learn how to act like adults by the time they are 35, they never will. It is time for parents all over America to exercise some tough love, because we are facing a major national crisis.
If you go all the way back to the mid-1970s, well over half of all 18 to 34-year-olds were already married and lived with their new spouse in their new households.
But today the most common living arrangement for those in that age group is living with Mommy and Daddy
In 1975, when the oldest Boomers were 29, 57% of 18 to 34- year-olds lived with a spouse in their own household. Even as late as 1990, almost half lived with a partner. But in 2016, 31% were living in their parents’ home, making it the new, most common living arrangement for young adultsaccording to Census data.
Yes, I know that life is rough and housing is expensive and good jobs are hard to find.
But that is what being an adult is all about – overcoming the tough times and learning to stand on your own.
And because our young people are not getting out on their own, a lot fewer of them are getting married and having children. Here are some more numbers from Axios
  • In 2017, 57% of millennials were never married. In 1985 — when boomers were around the same age — only a third had never been married, Pew Research’s Richard Fry told Axios. Even accounting for unmarried living partners does not make up the difference, he said.
  • Having fewer children: When Boomers were in their 20s, the fertility rate was 2.48, well beyond the replacement level of 2.1. Today, it is just 1.76.
  • When a recent survey asked why they were having fewer kids, most young adults said “child care is too expensive.”
Sadly, a lot of parents actively encourage their children to put off marriage and children. I have actually listened to many of these conversations personally. The young people are told that they cannot be “tied down” while they are getting an “education”, and that “pursuing a career” must come first.
So has this approach made us happier as a nation?
Well, this may or may not be related, but according to the CDC the suicide rate in the United States has gone up almost 30 percent since 1999
“Suicide rates in the United States have risen nearly 30 percent since 1999, and mental health conditions are one of several factors contributing to suicide,” the CDC researchers wrote in their report.
“From 1999 to 2015, suicide rates increased among both sexes, all racial/ethnic groups, and all urbanization levels.”
We are not a happy country, and it is time for a change.
Unfortunately, it is not going to be easy to turn things around because the process begins very early. Our young people are not prepared for life as adults because the education system in this nation is a complete joke.
Let me say it again so that you understand me perfectly.
The education system in this nation is a complete joke.
I know, because I spent 20 years in the system. I graduated from public high school and then I went on to spend an additional 8 years at public universities.
We are witnessing the systematic “dumbing down” of America, and our schools are producing an endless stream of brain-dead zombies. One study that was conducted not too long ago found that one-third of all high schools in the city of Baltimore did not have a single student that was proficient in math
An alarming discovery coming out of City Schools. Project Baltimore analyzed 2017 state testing data and found one-third of High Schools in Baltimore, last year, had zero students proficient in math.
You would figure that every school would have at least a few nerdy kids that were good with numbers, but apparently that is not the case in Baltimore.
And of course Baltimore is far from alone. Just consider the following numbers
After leading the world for decades in 25-34-year-olds with university degrees, the U.S. is now in 12th place. The World Economic Forum ranked the U.S. at 52nd among 139 nations in the quality of its university math and science instruction in 2010.
According to the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress, 68% of public school children in the U.S. do not read proficiently by the time they finish third grade. And the U.S. News & World reported that barely 50% of students are ready for college-level reading when they graduate…
And in case you are tempted to think that last number is exaggerated, PBS has reported that in one recent year more than 200 colleges had to place “more than half of incoming students in at least one remedial course”…
Data from 911 two- and four-year colleges revealed that 96 percent of schools enrolled students who required remediation in the 2014-15 academic year, the most comprehensive recent numbers. At least 209 schools placed more than half of incoming students in at least one remedial course.
It isn’t as though most college courses are very challenging either. The truth is that the family dog could have passed most of the courses that I ever had to sit through.
And instead of teaching our kids useful skills that can be used in the marketplace, many of these courses are all about indoctrinating them to see the world in a particular way…
Colleges nationwide are teaching students about tacos, hooking up and country music’s “homophobic and racist” message — but those are just a few examples, as classes such as “Queer Religion” and “Racial Capitalism” become the new norm.
If we want America to have any sort of a positive future, we need to completely change our approach to education, and then we need to kick our kids out of the nest when they reach a certain age so that they can learn to be adults.
Because right now what we are doing is not working, and as a result we have a giant mess on our hands.

TWITTER HIRES "EXPERTS IN ISLAM" & "RIGHT WING POPULISM" TO BANISH "INTOLERANT DISCOURSE"

TWITTER HIRES "EXPERTS IN ISLAM" & 
"RIGHT WING POPULISM" TO BANISH "INTOLERANT DISCOURSE" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This will be more Left-wing bias, and more censorship of views that dissent from the Left’s agenda, since it is certain that the “experts in Islam” that Twitter has hired are apologists who insist it is a religion of peace, not people who actually know and are willing to state what is in the Qur’an and Sunnah.
“Twitter hires experts in Islam and right-wing populism to banish ‘intolerant discourse,’” by Jasper Hamill, Metro, July 30, 2018:
Twitter has launched a new scheme to clamp down on ‘abuse, harassment and other types of behaviours that can detract or distort from the public conversation’.
It has selected two teams of academics to begin a project aimed at silencing the wrong type of speech on the social network.
The researchers have expertise in a wide range of subject areas including Islam, diversity and the spread of right-wing populism.
They will work to measure the effect of echo chambers and hate speech on Twitter, with the data used to guide the tech giant’s future strategy.
‘Earlier this year, as part of our global health initiative, we committed to serving the public conversation and working to increase the collective health, openness, and civility of the dialogue on our service,’ wrote Vijaya Gadde, who works as legal, policy and trust and safety lead at Twitter.
‘We want everyone’s experience on Twitter to be free of abuse, harassment and other types of behaviours that can detract or distort from the public conversation….
Dr. Rebekah Tromble, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Leiden University, is leader of a scheme called ‘examining echo chambers and uncivil discourse’.
She has a PhD in political science with a minor in ‘transnational Islam’ and wrote her dissertation called: ‘Who Framed the Prophet? Media, Stakeholders, and the Debate over the Danish Cartoon Controversy.’
Tromble will work with several scientists including Dr. Michael Meffert, who also works at Leiden University and has written several papers on the right-wing.
‘In the context of growing political polarization, the spread of misinformation, and increases in incivility and intolerance, it is clear that if we are going to effectively evaluate and address some of the most difficult challenges arising on social media, academic researchers and tech companies will need to work together much more closely,’ Tromble said….
It will also attempt to develop algorithms which hunt out ‘intolerant discourse’ and automatically recognise hate speech, racism or xenophobia.

STATEN ISLAND, NYC: MUSLIMA FALSELY CLAIMS LANDLORD EVICTED HER & STOLE FROM HER BECAUSE OF "ISLAMOPHOBIA"

STATEN ISLAND, NYC: MUSLIMA FALSELY CLAIMS LANDLORD EVICTED HER & STOLE FROM HER BECAUSE OF "ISLAMOPHOBIA" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/07/nyc-muslima-falsely-claims-landlord-evicted-her-and-stole-from-her-because-of-islamophobiarepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Shanahan’s lawyer said: “We presented voluminous evidence of the unreliability and lack of veracity of the complainant. This case should never have been brought. It’s my opinion the authorities, particularly the New York City Police Department, took the path of least resistance and they arrested the law-abiding, hard-working, tax-paying landlord because the tenant was playing the race/ethnicity card, and she alleged she was being victimized by the landlord because she’s a Muslim. Nothing could have been further from the truth. The only victim here was Ms. Shanahan.”
Muslim victimhood is a big business. Islamic advocacy groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) get so much mileage out of claims of “Islamophobia” that “anti-Muslim hate crimes” are all too often faked by Muslims themselves.
“Criminal charges against ex-Conservative Party chair tossed in Muslim tenant’s eviction,” by Frank Donnelly, SILive.com, July 30, 2018:
STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — A special prosecutor on Monday dropped criminal charges against a former chairwoman of the borough Conservative Party accusing her of unlawfully evicting a Muslim tenant from her Eltingville apartment and stealing from the woman.
Mary Lou Shanahan, 55, was arrested on Oct. 4, 2015, and charged with illegally removing everything from Hasna Jalal’s apartment, including TVs, furniture, sofas, a bed, kitchen appliances and other personal items three days earlier. She was also accused of changing the apartment’s locks.
Jalal was living on the third floor of Shanahan’s home.
Jalal, who later sued Shanahan unsuccessfully in Brooklyn federal court, had moved in about a month earlier, court papers said.
In her civil suit, Jalal alleged Shanahan had disparaged her when she heard Jalal speaking on the phone with Moroccan relatives in her native tongue, called her offensive names and threatened her.
Shanahan was charged in the criminal case with felony counts of grand larceny and stolen-property possession. She was also accused of misdemeanor counts of criminal trespass, unlawful eviction, petit larceny and stolen-property possession….
Shanahan was elected chairwoman of the borough’s Conservative Party in September 1998 and served a two-year term, according to Advance reports….
The felony charges were subsequently dismissed, but the misdemeanor charges remained.
The misdemeanor counts were tossed Monday at a proceeding in Criminal Court, said Joseph Sorrentino, Shanahan’s criminal defense lawyer.
“We presented voluminous evidence of the unreliability and lack of veracity of the complainant,” Sorrentino said.
“This case should never have been brought,” said Sorrentino. “It’s my opinion the authorities, particularly the New York City Police Department, took the path of least resistance and they arrested the law-abiding, hard-working, tax-paying landlord because the tenant was playing the race/ethnicity card, and she alleged she was being victimized by the landlord because she’s a Muslim. Nothing could have been further from the truth. The only victim here was Ms. Shanahan.”
A spokesman for the Brooklyn district attorney’s office confirmed the criminal charges were dismissed but declined further comment.
Jalal contended in the $1.2 million suit that neighbors told her Shanahan and her landscaping employees took a $35,000 Hermes bag, a $35,000 Rolex watch, a $15,000 24-karat gold necklace, $6,000 worth of flat screen televisions, and an $8,000 Louis Vuitton luggage set from her apartment.
A Brooklyn federal court jury was not convinced and in February voted in Shanahan’s favor.
Besides rejecting Jalal’s claim, the panel awarded Shanahan $16,570 on her counterclaims of fraudulent inducement, slander and property damage, online federal court records show….
______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.silive.com/southshore/index.ssf/2018/02/jury_nixes_suit_alleging_ex-si.html 

https://pix11.com/2016/01/28/theyre-going-to-think-youre-from-al-qaeda-staten-island-tenant-claims-she-was-locked-out-for-speaking-arabic/

TOMMY ROBINSON FREED FROM JAIL LOOKING GAUNT~KANGAROO COURT CONVICTION VOIDED~SUPPORTERS CELEBRATE COURT VICTORY~COURT ADMITS UNREASONABLE SENTENCING, ANOTHER HEARING POSSIBLE

TOMMY ROBINSON IS HOME WITH HIS FAMILY
LOST 42 POUNDS IN JAIL
JUDGE ADMITS 
"PROCESS WAS FLAWED"
(TO SAY THE LEAST)
VIDEO ABOVE: TOMMY REFUSES TO SPEAK TO FAKE NEWS REPORTERS
TOMMY ROBINSON FREED FROM JAIL LOOKING GAUNT~SUPPORTERS CELEBRATE COURT VICTORY~COURT ADMITS UNREASONABLE SENTENCING, ANOTHER HEARING POSSIBLE
BRITISH PATRIOT, MUSLIM RAPE GANG EXPOSER, SPENT 2 MONTHS IN JAIL & SOLITARY CONFINEMENT

Tommy Robinson FREED in a Victory 

for Nationalist Populism!!!

Report by Dr. Steve Turley
Canada's "Rebel Media" report by Ezra Levant
Ezra Levant vs. Antifa as Tommy Robinson 
WINS appeal! 

Tommy Robinson WINS: 

Ezra Levant reads lawyers' statement


TOMMY ROBINSON SHOCKING PRISON TREATMENT


Tommy Robinson greets Ezra Levant 

after his release from prison


EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Tommy Robinson tells Ezra Levant about prison treatment

NEW YORK TIMES SLAMS, MALIGNS TOMMY 
FROM JIHAD WATCH 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/tommy-robinson-freed-on-bailrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal ordered his release, pending a new hearing in his case. The court questioned the speed with which he had been tried and convicted, noting that it took five hours from the time of his arrest to a conviction.”
It was only just to free Tommy Robinson, and lessens the impression that Britain is becoming a police state in which it is illegal to criticize Islam and mass Muslim migration in Britain today. Britain is still on that road, but apparently in this case the May government was feeling too much pressure to keep Tommy in prison.
Meanwhile, note the contempt and the vicious bias of this New York Times piece. This is Leftist propaganda disguised as a news story. Tommy is “anti-Muslim,” the universal label applied to those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women, gays, etc. Was opposing the Nazis “anti-German”?
Tommy is also a “far-right activist.” Anyone, no matter how socially liberal and how committed to the principles of secular, republican rule, is “far-right” for opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression. There is no substance to the term other than to try to equate such opposition with Nazism.
The the Times semaphores to its dwindling Leftist readership, if the point weren’t clear enough already, that Tommy is not to have their support, for he is supported by “former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon but reviled by others who call him a violent purveyor of hate.” Who calls him a “violent purveyor of hate”? Hope Not Hate, a Leftist smear group akin to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Then there is the open libel that Robinson’s “divisive, anti-Muslim rhetoric has resulted in acts of violence,” he added, the most extreme of which occurred when a man, inspired by Mr. Robinson, rammed a van into a congregation of Muslims leaving a mosque in north London in January.”
In reality, there was no “inspiration” from Robinson, who never called for any attacks on mosques. The Times makes this connection based on a mass email that the perpetrator received, which itself did not call for or justify any violence. The Times rushes to connect Robinson to this incident, while it can never quite see the connection between Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” while killing people and the violent passages of the Qur’an.
“Tommy Robinson, Anti-Muslim Activist, Is Freed on Bail in U.K.,” by Palko Karasz, New York Times, August 1, 2018:
LONDON — Tommy Robinson, the jailed British far-right activist backed by the former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon but reviled by others who call him a violent purveyor of hate, was ordered to be freed on bail Wednesday, after challenging his conviction for contempt of court.
Mr. Robinson was arrested in May after he live-streamed a video from outside a criminal trial in Leeds, England, which had a news media blackout, revealing the defendants’ identities. He was sentenced to 13 months in prison for contempt of court, provoking an international outcry in far-right circles.
On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal ordered his release, pending a new hearing in his case. The court questioned the speed with which he had been tried and convicted, noting that it took five hours from the time of his arrest to a conviction.
Who is Tommy Robinson?
Anti-Muslim activist
Mr. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, is the founder of the English Defense League, an anti-Islam and anti-immigration movement, known for violent street protests.
Born and raised in Luton, north of London, he worked at the town’s international airport but lost that job for assaulting an off-duty police officer. He was also arrested after being accused of inciting soccer violence, as a supporter of the Luton soccer club.
“Wherever he has gone in his career he organized demonstrations that have resulted in extreme violence,” said Joe Mulhall, a senior researcher at Hope Not Hate, a London-based organization that researches hate groups.
“His divisive, anti-Muslim rhetoric has resulted in acts of violence,” he added, the most extreme of which occurred when a man, inspired by Mr. Robinson, rammed a van into a congregation of Muslims leaving a mosque in north London in January….

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S "MAGA" RALLY IN TAMPA, FLORIDA~SIGNS TECHNICAL EDUCATION BILL INTO LAW

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S "MAGA" RALLY IN TAMPA, FLORIDA

Trump EXPOSES Democrats Registering 

Illegal Aliens to Vote, Demands Voter ID 

Signs MAJOR Technical Education Bill 

into Law in Tampa

Introduced by beautiful Ivanka Trump, President Trump delivers AMAZING Remarks on Workforce Development and signs Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act at Tampa Bay High school in Florida

MIKE GENDRON INTERVIEWED: COMMON BONDS BETWEEN CATHOLICISM & ISLAM

MIKE GENDRON INTERVIEWED: COMMON BONDS BETWEEN CATHOLICISM & ISLAM 
With the rise of globalism we have seen a push toward a system of global government as well as a one world religion. Mike Gendron joins us to talk about this as well as the common bonds between Catholicism and Islam.

Former Catholic of 38 Years Reveals 

False Teaching of Pope Francis



THE CENSORSHIP BATTLE OF ALEX JONES & WHY IT AFFECTS US ALL

THE CENSORSHIP BATTLE OF ALEX JONES & WHY IT AFFECTS US ALL
BY THE NEW AMERICAN
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/censorship-battle-alex-jones-affects-us/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
TheNewAmerican.com
Bombastic talk-show host Alex Jones knows how to get under people’s skin, and he does so regularly. Currently, he is facing no less than five defamation suits against him in Texas courts, a 30-day suspension of his personal Facebook account, constant scrutiny and strikes against him by YouTube, calls for him to be banned from Spotify, and a coordinated attempt by mainstream media outlets such as CNN to marginalize him.
Three of the five lawsuits against Jones are being brought by Houston Attorney Mark Bankston, who is representing three families of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting. The suits claim that Jones both pedaled and endorsed conspiracy theories that claimed the Sandy Hook massacre was a staged government event designed to impact the gun-control debate. Jones denies the charges and claims he was acting as a “devil’s advocate” during discussions on the Sandy Hook tragedy and the resulting conspiracy theories around it.
On Wednesday, Bankston and Jones’ attorney Mark Enoch will be in court to argue whether one case, brought by Sandy Hook victim Noah Pozner’s family, should be thrown out owing to the Texas Citizens Participation Act, a law that passed unanimously and was signed by Governor Rick Perry in 2011. The law is designed to protect Texas citizens’ free-speech rights against meritless claims designed merely to silence their speech.
“Plaintiffs suffered a horrible tragedy. Alex Jones and his InfoWars are not responsible for that tragedy,” the motion to dismiss stated. “To punish them for First Amendment protected speech on this matter of public concern will not bring back the lives lost. To stifle the press by making them liable for merely interviewing people who have strange theories will simply turn this human tragedy into a constitutional issue.”
Should the case go to trial, it’ll be less about young Noah Pozner’s death and his grieving family than it will be about the blurry line between free speech and libel. It will become a televised free-for-all pitting free speech against so-called fake news.
“The purpose of this lawsuit is to create new Texas law that opens citizens of the state to civil liability should they openly question the government and/or craft any type of ‘conspiracy theory’ or differing view to that which is reported by the mainstream media,” Enoch said.
Besides the Pozner case and the four other Texas cases against him, Jones faces another defamation suit in Connecticut over his Sandy Hook conspiracy reporting. Jones is also the defendant in a Virginia defamation suit brought by a witness to the Charlottesville unrest, Brennan Gilmore, who claims that Jones smeared him as a “shill for the deep state.” In addition, Jones is being sued over his coverage of the Parkland, Florida, school shooting.
Jones appears confident in his ultimate victory in these lawsuits, letting his lawyers do most of his talking for him. In all, Jones has been sued more than a dozen times in the past year, settling one of the suits against Idaho-based yogurt maker Chobani. Jones was forced to apologize for making statements about Chobani importing “migrant rapists” to work for them.
The host of Infowars seems much more intent on challenging the powers behind the social-media bans and mainstream media smear campaigns against him. Jones has frequently gone up against globalist groups such as the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderbergers, and the Council on Foreign Relations, accusing them of conspiring to create a one-world socialist government and imposing a caste system of sorts, with the elites at the top and the rest of us in servitude to them.
Is it any wonder that the globalists want to shut him up?
“The establishment is making its move against free speech here in America,” Jones told his audience Monday. “These aren’t journalists. These are killers of free speech; these are corporate mercenaries making their move ahead of the 2018 mid-terms.”
For globalists and denizens of the Deep State, the First Amendment to the Constitution is a problem. How can they impose a one-world-system and a socialist “utopia” with all of these conservatives, advocates of freedom, and yes, even conspiracy theorists out there speaking their minds? Love him or hate him, give Alex Jones credit. His swagger and bombastic actions are calling attention to something that the globalists hoped they could keep under the radar: their attempt to slowly erode our freedoms without us noticing.
_________________________________________________________________

Fox News Attacks Alex Jones 

And Shows No Clips To Prove Anything


BOYERTOWN, PA: APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING IN FAVOR OF SCHOOL DISTRICT POLICY ALLOWING GIRL TO USE BOYS' LOCKER ROOM

APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING IN FAVOR OF SCHOOL DISTRICT POLICY ALLOWING GIRL TO USE BOYS' LOCKER ROOM 
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/07/30/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-in-favor-of-school-district-policy-allowing-girl-to-use-boys-locker-room/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. — An appeals court in Pennsylvania has declined to give a en banc review of a ruling upholding a lower court decision in favor of a school district’s policy that permitted a girl who identifies as a boy to use the boys’ locker room, and a boy who identifies as a girl to use the girls’ restroom.
The 12 judges of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals voted 8-4 not to revisit the decision issued last month by a smaller three-judge panel. The four that dissented said that while they agreed that the court should not issue an injunction against the Boyertown School District’s policy, they believed the court should have avoided “wading into fraught waters” by interpreting what Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 requires in regard to those with gender dysphoria.
“To say or imply that there is only one legally defensible policy decision that a school district can reach is not only unsupported; it is unsupportable,” they wrote. “[W]e should confine ourselves to resolving the specific matters before us, not some bigger issue we might like to address.”
The three-judge panel issued a revised ruling that still denied the injunction but toned down its language as it pertains to Title IX.
“Forcing transgender students to use bathrooms or locker rooms that do not match their gender identity is particularly harmful. It causes ‘severe psychological distress often leading to attempted suicide.’ The result is that those students ‘avoid going to the bathroom by fasting, dehydrating, or otherwise forcing themselves not to use the restroom throughout the day.’ This behavior can lead to medical problems and decreases in academic learning,” the panel wrote in both the June and revised versions.
It said that while there have been other students who have likewise limited their fluid intake to “minimize or avoid encountering transgender students,” the court does “not view the level of stress that cisgender students may experience because of appellees’ bathroom and locker room policy as comparable to the plight of transgender students who are not allowed to use facilities consistent with their gender identity.”
“Given the majority of the testimony here and the district court’s well-supported findings, those situations are simply not analogous,” the panel claimed.
It said that if any student—on either side of the issue—is uncomfortable with the locker room arrangement, they may utilize other areas to change.
“Any student who is uncomfortable changing around their peers in private spaces, whether transgender or cisgender, may change in a bathroom stall, single-user bathroom, or the private team rooms,” the court outlined. “The appellants seemingly admit that these accommodations ‘resolve all privacy concerns.’ Yet they insist that the policy should be changed to require that transgender students use individual bathrooms if they do not wish to use the communal facilities that align with their birth-determined sex.”
“Not only would forcing transgender students to use single-user facilities or those that correspond to their birth sex not serve the compelling interest that the school district has identified here, it would significantly undermine it,” it argued.
As previously reported, the legal challenge, filed against the Boyertown School District near Reading, began in early 2017 when a male student and his parents felt that their voice was not being heard in regard to a girl who was allowed to change in the boys’ locker room at Boyertown Senior High School.
According to the lawsuit, and an online video released by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)-affiliated attorney Randall Wenger, in October 2016, as the student was changing in the boys’ locker room for gym class, he noticed a girl standing just feet away from him also in a state of partial undress.
“While he was partially undressed, he looked behind him and noticed a girl standing there wearing nothing above her waist other than a bra,” Wenger explained.
Immediately concerned about the situation—as he was standing in nothing but his underwear, the teen hurriedly put his clothes on and left.
“He was naturally upset, so he went after class with a group of friends to go see the [assistant] principal to find out what was going on,” Wenger outlined. “And the [assistant] principal told him, ‘I’ve got no other options for you. I’m going to ask you to tolerate this and make it as natural as you possibly can.’”
The boy’s parents then sought themselves to meet with the assistant principal, Wayne Foley, but were allegedly advised that “the school district is ‘all-inclusive’ and that if [the boy] had a problem changing or using restrooms with people of the opposite sex, he would get him permission to go to the nurse’s office to change.”
Unsatisfied with Foley’s answer, the teen’s parents then met with Principal Brett Cooper, but he reiterated that the boy could use the nurse’s office if he was uncomfortable changing his clothes in front of the girl.
They soon also met with district Superintendent Richard Faidley, but he too held his ground, stating that if the boy did not want to change in the presence of the girl, and if he did not wish to use the nurse’s office, his parents could take him out of school and homeschool him.
The student sued the school district in March 2017, and since then, four other students have come aboard as plaintiffs, including Alexis Lightcap, who similarly went to Principal Foley after finding a male in the girls’ restroom.
“[Plaintiff] has a fundamental right to bodily privacy that, at a minimum, includes protection from intimate exposure of his body and intimate activities to a person of the opposite sex. It also includes the corollary protection from intimate exposure to a female’s body or intimate activities,” the legal challenge outlined.
A federal judge declined to grant the injunction in August, stating that the students had failed to show that they were being injured by the district’s allowance. An appeal was filed with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, but the injunction was again denied. On Thursday, the court declined to rehear the case en banc, or before the full 12-judge court of appeals.
It is not yet known whether the plaintiffs will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The judges who dissented in Thursday’s ruling were Kent Jordan, Michael Chagares, Thomas Hardiman and Stephanos Bibas.