THE NSA HAS BEEN & STILL IS SPYING
ON ALL YOUR CONVERSATIONS;
INFOWARS REPORTED THIS 11 YEARS AGO,
AND WERE LABELED "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS"
Thursday, March 9, 2017
CIA HAS BEEN SPYING ON AMERICANS FOR YEARS
CIA HAS BEEN SPYING ON AMERICANS FOR YEARS
CIA Is Using Technology To Subvert The Constitution
MUSLIM WOMEN'S ACTIVIST LINDA SARSOUR IS ARRESTED
LINDA SARSOUR IS ARRESTED
HAMAS AGENT, SHARIA PROPONENT, WOMEN'S MARCH LEADER
FROM BAY RIDGE, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK CITY
OWEN SCHROYER OF INFOWARS REPORTS
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT SARSOUR:
http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/01/southwest-airlines-flight-turns-on-pink.html
SEE ALSO: http://lindasarsour.blogspot.com/
http://www.arabamericanny.org/lindasarsour
https://www.whitehouse.gov/champions/giving-back-to-community/linda-sarsour
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-on-msnbc-muslim-kids-being-executed-in-the-u-s
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/islamic-supremacist-linda-sarsour-says-of-islamophobes-their-job-is-to-vilify-islam-and-muslims
http://www.brooklyndaily.com/stories/2014/37/br-sarsour-beheading-threat-2014-09-12-bk_2014_37.html
http://www.heyridge.com/2015/08/an-assault-reveals-the-deep-divisions-in-bay-ridge/
MORE OPPRESSION CHIC: FACEBOOK MARKS INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY WITH IMAGE OF GIRL IN HIJAB; NIKE INTRODUCES PRO HIJAB ATHLETIC HEADWEAR, ETC.
MORE OPPRESSION CHIC:
FACEBOOK MARKS INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY WITH IMAGE OF GIRL IN HIJAB
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/more-oppression-chic-facebook-marks-international-womens-day-with-image-of-girl-in-hijab;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This is great. Facebook hereby signals its virtue: it is standing
with Muslim women and presumably against Donald Trump and racist,
redneck yahoos everywhere. But where is Facebook’s concern for Aqsa
Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide
after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab;
or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South
Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents; or the fifteen girls in Saudi Arabia who were killed
when the religious police wouldn’t let them leave their burning school
building because they had taken off their hijabs in their all-female
environment; or all the other women and girls who have been killed or
threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?Who is standing in solidarity with them? Do they have any place in International Women’s Day? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who stands with them?
________________________________________________________
ALL THE BETTER TO MAKE A QUICKER HIT AND RUN, PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE STYLE
Oppression chic: Nike offers “Pro Hijab”
for athletic Muslimas
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/oppression-chic-nike-offers-pro-hijab-for-athletic-muslimas;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Will Nike offer stoning supplies for adulterous Muslimas? Will Nike offer a series of blades suitable for slitting the throats of Muslimas who dare not to wear the hijab? Will Nike offer Klan hoods for racist athletes?
“Nike Has A New Product For Muslim Women: The ‘Pro Hijab,’” by Zahraa Alkhalisi, CNN, March 7, 2017:
PHILADELPHIA (CNN) — Nike will soon begin selling a performance hijab for Muslim women athletes.
The head cover, called the “Nike Pro Hijab,” boasts a single-layer pull-on design made from lightweight polyester in dark, neutral colors. The fabric’s tiny holes will make it breathable while remaining opaque, a requirement for hijab-wearing women.
Nike said it began developing the hijab after some Muslim athletes complained about wearing a traditional head scarf during competition.
The design process took 13 months, and the final product will be available for sale in the company’s Spring 2018 season.
Nike said the hijab is already being worn by Emirati figure skater Zahra Lari.
“I was thrilled and a bit emotional to see Nike prototyping a Hijab,” Lari said in a statement. “I’ve tried so many different hijabs for performance, and … so few of them actually work for me. But once I put it on and took it for a spin on the ice, I was blown away by the fit and the light weight.”…
ROBERT SPENCER: WHY THE STATE DEPARTMENT SWAMP IS IN DIRE NEED OF DRAINING
ROBERT SPENCER: WHY THE STATE DEPARTMENT SWAMP IS IN DIRE NEED OF DRAINING
298,000 JOBS CREATED IN TRUMP'S FIRST MONTH, SHATTERING EXPECTATIONS
298,000 JOBS CREATED IN TRUMP'S FIRST MONTH, SHATTERING EXPECTATIONS
Construction jobs swell by the most in 11 years
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Donald Trump has
received a huge boost for his economic agenda with the news that the
U.S. created 298,000 new jobs after his first full month in office,
shattering expectations by a margin of over 100,000.
The total blasted through market expectations that around 190,000 new jobs would be created.
“The
report encompassed the first full month under President Donald Trump,
who has pledged to rebuild the nation’s aging infrastructure system,” reports CNBC.
The numbers bode well for President
Trump’s agenda of economic nationalism and his vow to reverse the
ravages of globalism by bringing jobs back home.
The
breakdown of the numbers is significant because it shows that the U.S.
is becoming less dependent on service sector jobs as Trump tries to
provide new incentives for companies to take on more construction and
manufacturing workers.
Goods
producers added 106,000 of the new jobs, with construction jobs swelling
by 66,000 – the most in 11 years – and manufacturing jobs by 32,000.
Claims for unemployment benefits are also at the lowest for 44 years, suggesting employers are confident about the future.
“Companies
employing 500 or more workers increased staffing by 72,000 jobs;
payrolls rose by 122,000 at medium-sized businesses, or those with 50 to
499 employees, the most in three years; while small companies’ payrolls
gained 104,000, an eight-month high,” reports Bloomberg.
The
news is sure to be heralded by President Trump, while the mainstream
media, which Trump has accused of acting as the opposition party, will
look to bury the figures as it continues to spin the narrative that his
embryonic administration is in turmoil.
DOZENS OF UNVACCINATED STUDENTS BANNED FROM CLASS
DOZENS OF UNVACCINATED STUDENTS
BANNED FROM CLASS
BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/25541-dozens-of-unvaccinated-students-banned-from-class;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
In an unusual move that comes amid intensifying efforts across
America to provide what critics call “medicine at gun point,” dozens of
schoolchildren were banned from attending class in Rochester, Minnesota,
for not proving they received a dizzying array of government-mandated
vaccines. The reported number of students removed from school began at
around 80, declining to about 60 soon afterward. The only alternative to
the mandatory vaccines for schoolchildren is for their parents to jump
through legal hoops to obtain an exemption. The controversial measure
was largely effective in ensuring widespread compliance with the vaccine
mandates, but critics are sounding the alarm about the threat to
freedom and medical ethics. Among the myriad shots now being required by state officials in Minnesota is one for chicken pox, which countless experts have questioned or even lambasted as counter-productive. Also required is the measles vaccine, which, according to the federal government's own data, is far more likely to kill American children than the disease it purports to protect against. Failure to receive even one of the more than one dozen mandatory shots resulted in the children being removed from class, according to press reports. Like most state governments across America, Minnesota authorities take their cues on vaccines from federal “recommendations” developed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
There are three routes for parents in Minnesota to escape the vaccine mandates. One is to simply avoid the schools and homeschool instead. Another is to receive an exemption from a healthcare provider for medical reasons. And finally, the Minnesota Department of Health offers parents a form on which they can claim a “conscientious objection” to the vaccines. The form must be notarized and filed with authorities. According to media reports, almost 400 students in Rochester Public Schools are already exempt under the “conscientious objection” exemption — an exemption now in the crosshairs of Big Pharma agents in the legislature.
Enforcement of the state laws dealing with forced vaccination varies between districts, with Rochester apparently taking the hardest line yet. School officials in Rochester, though, argued that they had made major efforts to make parents aware of the situation, sending out a letter in January and another in February warning them to comply or face consequences. The number of students not in compliance with the mandates apparently dropped by more than half before dozens of children were banned from school last week. Officials said they were working with families to get the correct documentation and that children could re-enroll as soon as their vaccine paperwork was in order.
The increasingly discredited establishment media, which counts Big Pharma and vaccine manufacturers among its biggest-spending advertising clients, virtually all celebrated the school district's controversial decision. The articles about the removal of the students quoted a wide array of pro-vaccine sources, but almost all failed to mention the reasons why so many parents across America are becoming more skeptical of vaccines. In editorials, newspapers in the state also cheered the drastic measures, calling for other districts to use similar tactics. When the concerns of parents were actually mentioned, media outlets dismissed them out of hand.
But more than a few critics in the alternative media did sound the alarm. Writing at NaturalBlaze.com, Dr. Gary Kohls, a medical doctor in Minnesota, suggested that disinformation from the Rochester-based Mayo Clinic and its crony cohorts in government and Big Pharma may have played a role in the decision by school authorities. However, he warned that advocates for such a scheme were doing so “without acknowledging — or perhaps even being aware of — the large amount of recent neuroscience-based evidence from scientists world-wide that should be modifying the out-dated CDC mandates.”
“Big Pharma and the CDC have very profitably generated and then propagated the myth that their over-priced and very poorly researched vaccines are both effective and safe,” added Dr. Kohl, a retired physician who had a 40-year family practice career and now tries to sound the alarm on vaccine dangers. “The safety and efficacy of all vaccines has been disproven (including the 270 new ones that the industry is currently developing and planning to market), but the word has not broken through to the large clinics like the Mayo Clinic.”
Commenting on the decision to remove children from school for non-compliance with the federally backed vaccine mandates, Kohl used harsh words to describe the scheme. “Sounds like police state tactics to me,” he said, noting that everything the Gestapo did in National Socialist (Nazi) Germany was technically legal under laws passed by the Nazi-controlled Reichstag. “The school board is as dis-informed as most health journalists are on this issue.” He suggested that media outlets may some day be accused of being “an accessory to a crime” for helping propagate what he called the “subterfuge” of the “safe and effective vaccine.”
But the coercive measures are not limited to Rochester, or even the United States. Just days before Rochester school officials began enforcing the ban on unvaccinated children in the classroom, virtually the same thing happened across the border in Canada. According to Canadian news reports, almost 700 students in Windsor-Essex were suspended from school due to incomplete vaccine records. “Although the suspensions can last up to 20 days, we are hoping students will update their records in a timely manner,” said Stacy Manzerolle, who runs the “Healthy Schools” program there.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has for years been helping to lead the fight against coercive vaccination and the undermining of medical ethics, especially the escalating assault on the time-honored principle of informed consent. “If the State can tag, track down and force citizens against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the State can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow,” NVIC co-founder Barbara Loe Fisher was quoted as saying.
But even as the Rochester school district's actions drew widespread attention, controversy surrounding the safety and efficacy of vaccines in general has again heated up, especially in light of President Donald Trump's skeptical views. On the campaign trail, he suggested vaccines were responsible for an “autism epidemic” among children. “People that work for me, just the other day, 2 years old, beautiful child went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic,” Trump declared in a GOP primary debate.
And years before successfully running for president, he was making similar statements. “Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes — AUTISM,” Trump said on social media three years ago. “Many such cases!” And in 2012, he made the same argument on Fox, saying that he had seen people with a “perfectly healthy child” who went for vaccinations and then, a month later, “the child is no longer healthy.” Big Pharma minions were outraged.
In addition to Trump's statements, a new documentary called Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe has been making waves across America. The explosive film was made with help from Dr. Andrew Wakefield. The British doctor first reported finding a link between autism and vaccines in the late 1990s, before becoming the victim of what appears to be an unprecedented smear campaign orchestrated by Big Pharma and the establishment media. Eventually the prestigious medical journal that published his study retracted it, but concerns never went away.
Among other information in the film: a confession by Dr. William Thompson, a whistleblower from the U.S. government's CDC, who says the feds deliberately concealed data showing a causal relationship between the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and autism. Essentially, the documentary and the experts interviewed in it argue that there is an “alarming deception” surrounding vaccines that has “contributed to the skyrocketing increase of autism and potentially the most catastrophic epidemic of our lifetime.”
As concerns grow across America about both the safety and efficacy of vaccines, Big Pharma and the politicians it showers money on have been waging a relentless counter-attack. Among the tactics: seeking to curtail choice and informed consent while viciously demonizing all who resist. California, for example, recently joined a handful of other states in removing non-medical exemptions to vaccines, including religious exemptions. A similar scheme is being considered in Minnesota as part of what critics have decried as an assault on freedom and medical ethics.
And all of the efforts to use coercion to push vaccines are happening despite the fact that Big Pharma lobbyists already convinced Congress to protect vaccine manufacturers from liability. That means that families of victims injured or killed by vaccines must be compensated by taxpayers through a special vaccine court, putting taxpayers on the hook for problems resulting from shots. Virtually no other industry enjoys such a privilege.
Attacks on medical freedom and informed consent similar to what is happening in America are underway outside of the United States, too — particularly as more and more parents begin to question the safety and efficacy of vaccines. In Australia, for instance, almost 150,000 families were cut off from childcare benefits for failure to obey vaccine mandates. Many European governments are also cracking down on resistors. In Africa, numerous prominent doctors and religious officials have argued that the United Nations was using a vaccine program to sterilize women.
But there is good news as well. For parents concerned about increasingly disastrous “education” and moral instruction in schools, along with the government's usurpation of power over their children's healthcare decisions, there are a growing range of options. Aside from the fast-growing homeschooling movement, burgeoning online schools such as Freedom Project Academy, an affiliate of this magazine, offer parents real choice — a good education, at a reasonable price, and without all the federal and state mandates covering everything from health to sex “education.”
As Big Pharma and the politicians doing its bidding step up their attacks on parental rights and informed consent, the backlash is certain to grow, and that means more options will likely be forthcoming for concerned parents. Still, doctors and health experts urge parents to be well informed on risks and benefits before making important medical decisions for their children.
Related articles:
Vaccine vs. Virus: Which Is the Bigger Threat?
Vaccinations: Who Calls the Shots?
California Legislature Approves One of the Strictest Vaccination Mandates in the U.S.
Obama Administration Plotting Adult Vaccination Mandates
Doctors: UN Vaccines in Kenya Used to Sterilize Women
Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths, Zero Measles Deaths, Since ’04
Blaming Anti-vax Parents for Mickey Mouse Measles
Should Government Force Parents to Have Their Children Vaccinated?
Swine Flu: The Risks and Efficacy of Vaccines
Doctors: UN Vaccines in Kenya Used to Sterilize Women
Ohio Parents Stop Coercive Medicine Aimed at Daughter
UN and Feds Plan to Fight Ebola With Tyranny
Obama’s “Ebola Czar” Thinks Overpopulation Is Top Challenge
NORTH KOREA ADMITS MISSILE LAUNCHES WERE TEST OF POSSIBLE STRIKE AGAINST U.S. BASES IN JAPAN~UN AMBASSADOR HALEY MAKES STATEMENT
NORTH KOREA ADMITS MISSILE LAUNCHES WERE TEST OF POSSIBLE STRIKE AGAINST U.S. BASES IN JAPAN
BY WARREN MASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Communist North Korea’s state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)
reported on March 7 that the nation’s launch of four missiles the
previous day was part of practice tests to hone its ability to strike
U.S. military bases in Japan.The four missiles were fired from a launch site on North Korea’s west coast and traveled more than 600 miles across the country before crashing into the Sea of Japan between Japan and the Korean Peninsula, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a text message to local reporters.
During a White House press conference on March 6, a reporter asked Press Secretary Sean Spicer for the White House’s reaction to North Korea’s firing of the four ballistic missiles.
Spicer replied:
The launches are consistent with North
Korea’s long history of provocative behavior. The United States stands
with our allies in the face of this very serious threat. The Trump
administration is taking steps to enhance our ability to defend against
North Korea’s ballistic missiles, such as through the deployment of a
THAAD battery to … South Korea.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un supervised the launch of the four missiles while “feasting his eyes on the trails of ballistic rockets,” the KCNA reported in a statement that analysts quoted by the Washington Post called a “brazen declaration” of the country’s intent to strike enemies with a nuclear weapon if it came under attack.
“If the United States or South Korea fires even a single flame inside North Korean territory, we will demolish the origin of the invasion and provocation with a nuclear tipped missile,” said the KCNA statement. The missiles fired on March 6 were “tasked to strike the bases of the U.S. imperialist aggressor forces in Japan,” the statement continued.
The Post report cited Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California, who said that North Korea had previously tested the types of missiles launched on March 6, so the apparent objective of the latest launches was not to see if they would fly, but to test how quickly they could be set and deployed — which is classic training for a wartime situation.
“They want to know if they can get these missiles out into the field rapidly and deploy them all at once,” Lewis said. “They are practicing launching a nuclear-armed missile and hitting targets in Japan as if this was a real war.”
CNN reported on March 7 that there are currently about 54,000 U.S. troops stationed in at least seven bases scattered across Japan, from Misawa Air Base in the far north to Okinawa in the far south.
The report noted that these military bases in Japan cost the U.S. government about $5.5 billion in 2016.
Some reports have indicated that North Korea may have conducted its missile launch in reaction to joint U.S.-South Korean military drills, as well as the U.S. deployment of a THAAD battery to South Korea.
THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) is a U.S. Army anti-ballistic missile system designed to shoot down short, medium, and intermediate range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase using a hit-to-kill approach. THAAD was developed to counter Iraq’s Scud missile attacks during the Gulf War in 1991. The missile carries no warhead, but relies on the kinetic energy of impact to destroy the incoming missile.
U.S. officials said that the missiles launched by North Korea were extended range SCUD missiles — the type that THAAD is designed to intercept. However, THAAD would have difficulty intercepting four missiles launched at the same time, unnamed analysts cited by the Post said.
The first parts of the THAAD system arrived the same day as the North Korean missile launch at Osan Air Base south of Seoul, South Korea’s Defense Ministry said.
The Post observed that North Korea’s launches coincided with joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises on the southern half of the Korean Peninsula that take place every year. North Korea has said in the past that it views these exercises as preparation for an invasion of the North.
Joshua Pollack, editor of the Nonproliferation Review, said in a statement cited by the Post that these latest launches appeared designed to send a message to both Trump and the Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, who was visiting the U.S. president when North Korea fired a medium- to long-range ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan on February 12.
As we noted in an article following that missile launch, Abe said that he expected the Trump administration to adopt a harder line on North Korea. Speaking during a joint appearance with Trump in Florida on the evening of February 11, Abe said: “North Korea's most recent missile launch is absolutely intolerable.”
Trump also made a brief statement after the missile launch: “I just want everybody to understand and fully know that the United States of America stands behind Japan, its great ally, 100 percent.”
After these latest missile tests by North Korea, Trump spoke by phone with Abe and South Korea’s acting president, Hwang Kyo-ahn, on March 7.
“Both Japan and the U.S. confirmed that this North Korean missile launch was a clear violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions and was an obvious challenge to the region and the international community,” Abe told reporters in Tokyo, repeating his assertion that the North Korean threat had “reached a new stage.”
These latest sabre-rattling actions taken by communist North Korea underline the perilous position the United States has taken since the end of World War II that continues to put U.S. military personnel in harm’s way. As noted by CNN, there are currently about 54,000 U.S. troops in Japan. The reason we have those troops stationed there is that following World War II, which was more than 70 years ago, the United States forced Japan to adopt a new constitution that keeps it permanently weak militarily. Article 9 of that constitution, particularly, prevents Japan from building a potent offensive military force.
As a result, the United States has maintained a large military force in Japan since the war, ostensibly to defend Japan against an invasion from Communist China.
Additionally, the United States keeps 25,000 troops in South Korea, presumably to deter North Korea from invading the South. This is a consequence of our government’s failure to achieve victory during the Korean War (which we should not have entered, but having entered it, we should have sought victory instead of a truce). The U.S. commander during the early years of the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur, is noted for having said: “War’s very object is victory, not prolonged indecision. In war there is no substitute for victory.”
However, when President Harry Truman relieved Macarthur of his command on April 11, 1951 after MacArthur made public statements that contradicted the administration's policies, the one military leader who could lead our forces to victory was removed from the action.
The war dragged on until fighting was ended by a truce on July 27, 1953 that resulted in a military stalemate. However, no peace treaty has been signed, and the two Koreas are technically still at war. The worst consequence of abandoning the victory that MacArthur sought, and likely could have achieved, was that the northern half of the peninsula was left under communist control.
Today’s crises, which intrinsically involve the United States, are the result of abandoning victory and leaving the communists in power in North Korea. If the United States had maintained a non-interventionist foreign policy since World War II, there would be no reason to maintain any U.S. troops overseas. We not only have almost 80,000 troops in harm’s way in Japan and South Korea, but the expense of maintaining those troops is several billion dollars. That money could be better spent on repairing America’s decaying infrastructure.
Related articles:
North Korea Missile Test Draws Reactions From Trump, Abe, and UN
North Korea Claims to Test H-Bomb
North Korea Postures With Nuclear Warning, Movement of Missiles
Crisis in Korea Continues
North Korea Attacks South Korea
The Aftermath of the Sinking of the South Korean Ship Cheonan
North Korea Prepares to Launch Missile
North Korea Issues Threats During U.S.-S. Korean Joint Exercise
North Korea Sentences U.S. Student to 15 Years of Hard Labor
Lawmakers Blast UN for Handing U.S. Technology to North Korea, Iran
_________________________________________________________
UN Ambassador Nikki Haley Makes Statement
on North Korea 3/8/17
Published on Mar 8, 2017
Wednesday,
March 8, 2017: U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Nikki
Haley gives a statement at a joint press stakeout following an
emergency UN Security Council consultations on the DPRK on March 8,
2017. Transcript is available at https://usun.state.gov/remarks/7699.