Thursday, October 6, 2016

UN PUSHES PLAN TO FORCE AMERICANS TO PAY REPARATIONS FOR SLAVERY

UN PUSHES PLAN TO FORCE AMERICANS TO PAY REPARATIONS FOR SLAVERY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In a recent report, the United Nations criticized the United States for making “no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent” and laid out plans to access financial resources of the country to fix that purported failure.
Specifically, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent has been tasked with implementing a UN mandate aimed at “establishing a working group or other mechanism of the United Nations to study the problems of racial discrimination faced by people of African descent.” The group’s progress is to be reported to the United Nations Human Rights Council and the General Assembly.
This particular mandate of the global government-in-waiting is divided up into six activities that should be accomplished by 2017, the last year of the Working Group’s authority to investigate the plight of people of African descent.
Bottom line: the United Nations created this group in 2002 to “gather all relevant information” from governments and non-governmental organizations that will help them in eliminating “racial discrimination against Africans and people of African descent in all parts of the world.”
As one would expect, while the theoretical target of these investigations is “the world,” the true target is the United States, the globo-crats’ biggest and most insuperable obstacle in its path toward total world domination.
Lately, though, the stumbling block that is the United States is going out of its way to transform itself into a stepping stone.
On September 26, the U.S. Ambassador Keith Harper announced the results of a “dialogue” conducted by the UN and some American groups that should give every friend of liberty pause as it reveals the depth and width of the UN’s plot to infiltrate American government and law enforcement from the smallest town to the largest metropolis.
In a statement, Harper reports that the UN’s Working Group “met with federal, state, and local government officials, judges and lawyers, members of Congress, police officers, academics, members of civil society, and hundreds of African Americans, in Washington, D.C.; Baltimore, Maryland; Jackson, Mississippi; Chicago, Illinois; and New York City.”
Just because the UN met with these groups doesn’t mean that the United States approves of their plan and its principles. Except that the U.S. delegation released a statement announcing its take on the talks.
“We were happy to arrange this visit and take note of the Working Group’s conclusions and recommendations, which we will distribute to relevant stakeholders, including the state and local government officials who met with the Working Group, for appropriate consideration,” the U.S. representatives said.
Despite the emphasis on blacks and their plight, the American delegation declared in its summary of the summit that the United States — from Washington, D.C. to city governments nationwide — had made “great progress toward countering racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related forms of intolerance.”
There you have it. It’s not just slavery that the American people must make amends for, they should be forced by the UN, working through local and federal government agencies, to demonstrate their acceptance of everything and everyone.
Should Americans resist this forced acceptance of the UN’s anti-discrimination indoctrination, the Working Group has a plan to overcome that little setback.
Paragraph f(3) of the group’s mandate provides access to “financial and developmental institutional and operational programs”.
Having access to these financial institutions will make it much easier for the UN to force Americans to “contribute to the development programs intended for people of African descent.”
The money siphoned from these sources will be used by the UN to exert control over “health systems, education, housing, electricity, drinking water and environmental control measures,” forcing them to employ an appropriate number of people of African descent.
Should this strategy prove insufficient, then the UN will enforce “other affirmative or positive measures and strategies within the human rights framework” to establish this racial equality that it claims is the purpose of the policy.
One need only imagine how devastating such a program could be to the middle class of the United States. People living from paycheck to paycheck because of the legal plunder perpetrated by their own governments (at all levels) will be subjected to increased income taxes levied to repair all the harm their ancestors ostensibly did to the ancestors of their neighbors. 
Not just any neighbor, though. The money collected by American governments (at all levels) will be earmarked for reparations to be paid to African Americans.
Surely the plutocrats at the UN know very well how this program would only work to exacerbate the growing racial divide in the United States and would give otherwise open-minded people without any racial prejudice reason to resent black people, people they would now see as recipients of another government-managed welfare program to which they claim to be “entitled” for no other reason than the color of their skin.
At the heart of it, this is the United Nations’ purpose: to follow the well-worn path trod by every tyrant who wanted to rule over a multitude of formerly free men. This centuries-old despotic design is to divide up a population into smaller communities that can be manipulated into seeing each other as the reason for their respective socio-economic distress.
The last of the recommendations published in the Working Group’s plan is for the United States to implement Executive Order 12898.
That order, signed by Bill Clinton in 1994:
directs federal agencies to identify and address the disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their actions on minority and low-income populations, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The order also directs each agency to develop a strategy for implementing environmental justice. The order is also intended to promote nondiscrimination in federal programs that affect human health and the environment, as well as provide minority and low-income communities access to public information and public participation.
In the 22-page report of its investigation into the plight of the African-American, the Working Group lays out a blueprint beyond Executive Order 12898, establishing how it could enforce a climate of acceptance and equality for the black population in America. 
Should these plans be put into practice, the United Nations would insinuate itself into every aspect of life from the grocery store to the gas station. There is no part of human activity that would not fall under the purview of the globalists. None of these policies, however, would serve to reduce racial animosity in America. 
In fact, should the United Nations, with the cooperation of all levels of American government, force one ethnic group to pay for past wrongs done to the ancestors of another ethnic group, the result will not be healing of wounds, but the pouring of the salt of socialism into those wounds, with the fleeced feeling greater anger at the beneficiaries.
The Working Group, the United Nations as a whole, and the government of the United States of America are prepared to implement all these programs over the next 10 years, culminating in the complete control of economic resources by 2024.

HILLARY’S STATE DEPARTMENT LOST $6 BILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS

HILLARY’S STATE DEPARTMENT LOST 
$6 BILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS
SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh354.htm
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Kelleigh Nelson

October 6, 2016
NewsWithViews.com
It was under Wilson, of course, that the first huge parts of the Marxist program, such as the progressive income tax, were incorporated into the American system. —Robert W. Welch, Jr.
America is a land of taxation that was founded to avoid taxation. —Laurence J. Peter
Why does a slight tax increase cost you two hundred dollars and a substantial tax cut save you thirty cents? —Peg Bracken
Trump Tax Records Illegally Published
On Saturday evening, 1 October 2016, the New York Times, which recently endorsed Hillary Clinton for president, illegally published three pages ofTrump’s 1995 income tax documents. To run for President of the United States, revealing your tax returns is unnecessary. The Times’ story is that Trump “declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years.” It is illegal for the IRS to share that information with anyone. It is also illegal for the Times to publish it, yet no one is talking about that.
Taxes are deferred with losses like this, giving the business an opportunity to rebuild, which is exactly what the Trump Organization did under Donald Trump’s leadership.

The New York Times and Hillary Clinton have both used the same provision. Losses in one year carry over and count against whatever gains or income you show in succeeding years. Hillary claimed a $700,000 loss on her taxes in 2015. She is also saying that Trump would get $4 billion by eliminating the estate tax and American citizens get nothing. What Hillary is not telling her supporters is that she’s using the exact same tax provisions on her own taxes. Twisted lies, that’s the mantra with Hillary Clinton.
If Hillary continues to mock Trump about his loss of nearly $1 billion, he needs to ask her to explain exactly how it was that she lost $6 billion taxpayer dollarsand has never been held accountable for this loss. The fact is, Mr. Trump’s loss was his own money and Hillary’s loss was our taxpayer dollars. Under her care, a U.S. Ambassador and three other brave Americans lost their lives. She lied repeatedly to their families and the American public about what happened. Her gross mishandling of foreign interferences in other governments has also cost American taxpayers millions! She also spent millions in taxpayer dollars outsourcing American jobs!
The scandal here has nothing to do with Trump’s tax records.
White House Trashed by Bill and Hillary, Artifacts Stolen
There’s another scandal Hillary doesn’t want Trump to talk about. In my last article, I told about a BLM Hillary supporter who defaced the brand new D.C. Trump International Hotel. Why? Because Hillary previously set the example. When the Clintons left the White House in 2001, they not only stole $200,000 worth of furniture, they also stole fine china and artwork, then they defaced White House walls with graffiti, destroyed antique doorknobs, glued desk drawers closed, removed the “w’s” from keyboards, cut electronic cabling, ripped phones out of the walls, and cost the American taxpayers thousands of dollars in repairs.
The Clinton name is synonymous with scandals, and always has been. What Hillary is using is calledpsychological projection, (accuse others of what you do). For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting. Therein lies the key to Hillary’s attacks on Mr. Trump. She is what she blames Mr. Trump for being, and we have proved it again and again.
Trump Followed the Law
Donald Trump has followed the law. Nobody is even alleging he broke the law. He certainly hasn't been accused of it by the IRS or anyone else. The media broke the law, and all for Hillary. The reality of this entire scenario is that the lawlessness of the Clintons is everywhere in every event, every day in our country. The real criminal activity is the Clintons’ illegal pay and play for their foundation. This includes their illegal acceptance of payoffs and front monies in advance of Hillary being elected president, while she was secretary of state. And that activity is being fully ignored by the MSM, which is not at all surprising.
Economic Downturn
That Trump was losing money during the early to mid-1990s — a period marked by bankruptcies and poor business decisions in the entire economy, was already well established. He has told this many times, but his wise business practices pulled him out of the decline and put him back on top. What he claimed on his taxes for his company is what any good businessman would do. You use the laws available to you, just like Cuban, Buffet, Soros, and the Clintons. Of course the Clinton’s Foundation monies come from Islamic sources, and the media avoids this subject as well.
The Rule of Law
The Rule of Law is what once governed our great nation, but abject lawlessness is determining the future and it is time it stopped. This is why so many Americans are supporting Donald J. Trump.
“Bottom line is Trump has paid hundreds of millions in property taxes, sales and excise taxes, real estate taxes, city taxes, state taxes, employee taxes and federal taxes, along with very substantial charitable contributions,” the campaign said. “Mr. Trump knows the tax code far better than anyone who has ever run for president and he is the only one that knows how to fix it.”
The MSM has abandoned all journalistic honesty and decency. Their outright goal is to seat Hillary Rodham Clinton in the White House to allow her to totally destroy the country with her Marxist globalist policies.
Tax Ramifications
Donald Trump says, "I am a smart business man." Some may think this is arrogance, but if it is true, then why can’t he state that fact? An accountant friend wrote the following:
Tax ramifications are only one of many points that are taken into account when making smart business decisions. Everyone has to follow the same IRS rules that Republicans and Democrats have established. To say you are smart because you don't pay any taxes is ridiculous.
Why does the IRS (aka Republicans and Democrats) allow accelerated write-offs of certain purchased assets? Both parties want to stimulate the economy, so they incentivize companies to make capital investments by allowing them to write them off quicker, thereby reducing their taxes their first year, protecting their capital reserves to reinvestment in more capital equipment which drives the economy and demand for increasing the labor force. It doesn't mean the company never has to pay taxes; the taxes are just delayed to future years.
It should be easy to rebuff the Democratic notion that Trump doesn't pay taxes. Typically, taxes can only be deferred on qualified capital investments to a later year unless you have businesses that have gone bad. His advisors should have this answer prepped for him every time this issue comes up.
Gingrich on Fox News with Neil Cavuto
Newt Gingrich had a few words to say regarding the expose of Trump’s taxes. “One difference between Trump and Clinton when it comes to taxes,” Newt Gingrich said, “is Clinton looks at tax revenues like a source of income for herself and her so-called charity, the Clinton Foundation.”
“Trump looks at taxes like most Americans do,” Gingrich said: “a price that must be paid for living in America, but one that should be as low as legally possible.”
“Most Americans agree with the principle that as long as you follow the law, if you can find ways to minimize your taxes, that’s totally legitimate, in fact, part of the American way of life,” Gingrich pointed out.
“Nobody expects you to go out and pay more than your fair share, your fair share is defined by the law.”
NYTs Calls Trump “The Comeback King”
In 1995, the NYTs specifically wrote about the collapse of the real-estate financial markets, and called Donald Trump, “The Comeback King.”
The article focused on the revival of Trump’s business fortunes after a series of missteps in the early 1990s, the same missteps it profiled in its article last weekend.
“Though there are still four years to go in the 90’s, business and government leaders in New York honored Donald J. Trump yesterday for pulling off what they called ‘the comeback of the decade,'” the paper said at the time. “Mr. Trump, the developer who came to epitomize opulent wealth during the 80’s before tumbling into deep financial trouble, has managed to erase much of his debt and is moving ahead with major projects at a time other developers are idling.”
Today though, the NYTs is backing Hillary, and anything they can say to derail Trump or put doubt in his supporters’ minds is the goal of the entire paper.
The Daily Caller writes, The Times is instead vilifying Trump for using his massive business losses as a tax write-off, allowing him to pay the IRS what the law required him to and no more. In the words of the Times, Trump’s adherence to U.S. tax law “relieved him of the burden of paying taxes like everyone else.”
Conclusion
There is nothing here but wise business practices by the Trump Organization. Unfortunately, we’ll never see an expose of the Clinton Foundation, Hillary’s email servers, Hillary’s destruction of 13 cell phones and 5 IPADS, or any of the other numerous documented corrupt policies and actions of Bill and Hillary Clinton in the NYTs or any other main stream media.
Yet, when Mr. Trump follows the laws of the land for the Trump Organization, the media vilifies him. The enemies of freedom are using the old mantra of class envy to try to destroy Donald Trump.
He has made his fortune fairly, and has remained inside the laws of the land. The Clintons, on the other hand, have used lies, obfuscation, and deceit to create their fortunes.
There is only one choice for President of the United States of America, and it certainly isn’t the scandal laden Hillary Clinton.

ROBERT SPENCER ON OBAMA'S FANTASY ISLAM

ROBERT SPENCER ON OBAMA'S FANTASY ISLAM 
Published on Oct 5, 2016
Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer explains how Barack Obama's public statements about Islam do not accord with Islamic teachings or the reality of current events.

JORY MICAH'S FALSE FEMINIST, SOCIALIST EGALITARIAN GOSPEL

JORY MICAH
SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR HIDING BEHIND SOCIALIST, PROGRESSIVE, ECUMENICAL, HERETICAL/APOSTATE CHRISTIANITY
FACEBOOK VIDEOS TELL OF HER STRUGGLES AGAINST GOD'S WORD:
IF GOD IS AGAINST US, WHO CAN BE FOR US? ANSWER: 
THE ONE WORLD ECUMENICAL CHURCH
FROM: http://www.jorymicah.com/; QUOTES:
"The body of Christ will thrive as daughters and sons of God once again, fully equal in both worth & authority, but we must be brave enough to buck against a broken systemNo doubt, patriarchy in the Christian Church is a beast and won’t go down easily, but if God is for us who can be against us? My top mission is to help women shake off the chains of limitation and the shackles of oppression that the Christian Church has wrapped around them in the name of the Bible and stale religion. My goal is to see women universally embraced as church leaders – elders, lead-pastors, evangelists, Bible-teachers, apostles, worship leaders, and every leadership position that both lay women and ordained ministers can dream up with God. I am also advocating for women to be given equal authority in their homes, as I believe Christ promoted gender equality. Essentially, I am campaigning for Christian women to be given “equal opportunity” to lead in the Church and the home, as I believe this is the Will of God and what the Bible teaches when read in proper context." 
___________________________________________________
BLENDING SOCIAL JUSTICE, FEMINIST IDEOLOGY, GENDER EQUALITY, PSYCHOLOGY, MENTORING/ADVOCACY, AND PROSPERITY MARKETING UNDER THE BANNER OF "PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY"
The False Doctrine of Jory Micah
BY BRANDON HINES
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/10/05/the-false-doctrine-of-jory-micah/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Jory Micah is a feminist “theologian” who has risen to promote egalitarianism and women in leadership. Many times, Micah reads the Bible in light of her feminism and not the other way around. Such a reading of Scripture will not only lead to numerous heterodoxies but will cause someone to believe and teach heresy. This has happened many times with her theology.
A dissection of her Master’s Thesis will show a few troubling doctrines. Besides a poor handling of God’s Word and a few points that rely solely on creating confusion about the text of Scripture, one thing that stood out was in her introduction, when she said, “While Jesus walked the earth as a male, there is no biblical evidence that Jesus’ glorified body is still male in Heaven.” Either she is claiming that Jesus is a transgender or she is claiming that Jesus no longer has a human nature, the Eutychian heresy. Either way, that statement is a Christ-related (Christological) heresy.
God reveals Himself as a male. Every single pronoun used for any member of the Godhead is a masculine pronoun. However, Jory Micah says in her Master’s Thesis, “God is just as much a Mother as He is a Father.” She has similarly said, “Our God is also a Mother – She births life and nurtures life.” (Source). She makes the argument that the Hebrew word for spirit is a feminine noun, therefore the Holy Spirit must be female (By that same logic, sin is female, as the Hebrew word for sin is feminine). (Source). God reveals Himself in the masculine, and that is because He is male. If you want to make the case that God is a female because He is compared to a female at times, you must also make the case that He is a chicken (Luke 13:34), a door (John 10:9), and a lion (Hosea 11:10).
She has also taken to endorsing Hillary Clinton, using the hashtag #ImWithHer (Source). To clarify, she is endorsing someone who supports the murder of unborn children up until the moment of birth. She is endorsing a candidate that is pro-infanticide. This is to be expected, however, as even though she claims to be Pro-Life she doesn’t support outlawing abortion  (Source). She seems to think that we shouldn’t outlaw abortion because just as many women get abortions in nations as it is legal as where it is illegal (A statement she made; I don’t know either way). I wonder if she would apply this same principle to other forms of murder?
She has even claimed to get divine revelation, saying multiple times that God spoke to her and not referring to Scripture (Here and here, for example). This claim of prophecy sets her supposed revelation as equal to Scripture, otherwise, it isn’t Theopneustos – God-breathed – and God didn’t really say it. If she is attributing something to God that God didn’t say, then it is false prophecy. If she is to say this is Theopneustos, then she is saying that Scripture is either insufficient or incomplete (To say either is heresy) and she is embracing the Montanist heresy. As John Owen said, “If private revelations agree with Scripture, they are unnecessary and if they disagree they are false.”
Finally, Micah has taken to defending the sin of immodesty. She wrote in one post on her site that “Modesty Rules” contribute to “Rape Culture”.  She has made the argument on her Facebook against “modesty rules” as well (Source). She made this argument based off of her own immodesty and how she felt when people corrected her, including that everyone else dressed that way so it should’ve been fine for her too. She rightly points out that those whose eyes cause them to stumble are told it is better to gouge them out, but she ignores what Matthew 18 says. Verse 6 (ESV) says, “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” Equally strong language is given for those who cause a believer (as context hints this is who is being referred to) to stumble.
To those who follow Jory Micah: Jory Micah is a false teacher, and is teaching heretical doctrine and leading many women astray. Her hermeneutic of reading Scripture through the lens of feminism has led her to abandon sound doctrine and chase false doctrines, and as 1 John 2:19 (ESV) says about these teachers, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.” She could be likened to the woman called Jezebel in Revelation 2, who was, “teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality.” I urge you, as Romans 16:17 (ESV) says, “I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them.”
To Jory Micah: I do not write this because I hate you. Quite contrarily, I write this because I love those who follow you and it is my hope that they would be protected from false doctrine and I love you and wish to see you repent. I urge you to repent and believe the Gospel. 2 Peter 2:1 says you are, “bringing upon [yourself] swift destruction.” Put down your lens of feminism, and read the Bible as it is intended to be read. Repent of your sin and your heresy and believe the Gospel.
For a presentation of the Gospel, please visit this link.
_____________________________________________________________
SHE'S SUPPOSED TO BE A MENTOR OR ADVOCATE BUT WHITEWASHES 
THE SIN OF GLUTTONY?
FROM SIZE 6 TO SIZE 12 BY SUPPORTING HER MINISTRY!
HER PHOTOGRAPHER KNOWS TO ALWAYS SHOOT HER ABOVE THE WAIST, WEARING BLACK, OR SITTING WITH KNEES DRAWN UP:
_MG_0228
QUOTE FROM: http://www.jorymicah.com/thirties-curvy-and-fine-allaboutthatbase/"Would I like to have my 22-year-old body back? Sure, but I would also like to have Philly cheese steak hoagies, wings, pizza, cookies, and cake. I really would like to be a size 6 again and maybe one of these days I will get super motivated to work towards that, but I have bigger fish to fry in my life right now!"
Women Leadership in the Home & Church
Published on Aug 18, 2015
Yes, God has called women to co-lead with men in both the home and church! In this video I share my personal testimony and explain the differences between complementarianism and egalitarianism. Patriarchy was never God's plan for His daughters!
USURPING THE MAN'S ROLE WHILE FIGHTING WEIGHT GAIN, MOOD SWINGS, HORMONAL CHANGES, CAREER AND RAISING CHILDREN?
BORN TO CHARISMATICS, SO SHE'S INTO THE "NAME IT & CLAIM IT"
A CHARISMATIC PREACHER TOLD HER THEN PREGNANT MOTHER THAT SHE WOULD GIVE BIRTH TO AN EVANGELIST
Is Complementarianism Oppressive of Women?
Jory Micah Says Yes, When You Hear/Read:
"Seven Ways To Discipline Your Wife"
A Biblical Response to Jory Micah's Women's Pastor Video

"BREAKING THE GLASS STEEPLE"

SEE MICAH'S MASTER'S THESIS:
EXCERPT: 
"The argument has grown tiresome, redundant, and frustrating: should women be allowed to hold leadership roles over men in the Christian Church? Many Christian leaders and biblical scholars have agreed to allow women in their pulpits, but many still cling to a view that makes the Apostle Paul look like a male chauvinist, who has given a universal principal that women are to be silent, and never hold a church office.   Many from the latter group are known as complementarians. Well known complementarian front runners, John Piper and Wayne Grudem, reason that the Apostle Paul taught that the husband/father figure of each family is ordained by God to lead his household, wife, and children. She and their children are to submit to his every rule, whim, and decision; life as they know it is a male dominated monarchy. Boys are taught to be strong leaders and providers, while girls are taught to be good followers and dependents. This may sound ideal to some, but families are not “cookie-cut” images of one another, and they certainly don’t always reproduce strong-willed boys and passive girls. Further, not all families have a father or a male figure in the equation. Therefore, if females are taught to be passive and dependent human beings, they will be unable to survive and provide for their families. Worse, many families endure the pain of an abusive father or male-figure who uses his power for evil, traumatizing both boys and girls under his “God-given” authority. These are all everyday, realistic scenarios that do not fit into the “complementarian box.”"
_______________________________________________________
HER EGALITARIANISM MEANS FOR HER TO BE DOMINANT & IN CONTROL:
"I adore my funny and laid-back husband Luke":
Jordy1

2016/2017 Speaking Schedule (Booking Now) 
October 28th – October 30th (2016): “The Courage Conference” in  Lynchburg, VA. (Learn more at thecourageconference.com).
January 25th – 25th (2017): “Free Methodist Conference” in Los Angeles, CA. (more details to come).
March 27th – March 31st (2017): “The Whole Woman Virtual Summit” (Learn More at TheWholeWomanSummit.com).
June 19th-22nd (2017): Word of Grace Conference at The Father’s House Church in Fort Collins, CO (more details to come).
July 21st – July 23rd (2017): “Mutual by Design: Building God’s Church Together” CBE International 2017 Conference in Orlando, FL (Details)
______________________________________________________
"Psycho Feminist vs. Conservative Critic"
YouTube Video by Mark Dice
DO YOU SEE THE SIMILARITY?
Published on Oct 5, 2016
Laci Green, the radical feminist and social justice warrior and MTV News contributor, filed a bogus copyright claim against a female YouTuber name Roaming Millennial, trying to get one of her videos taken down after she exposed Laci as another lunatic liberal in her report about the Cultural Appropriation Myth the left likes to promote during Halloween. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story. © 2016 by Mark Dice

Here is the video the SJW Laci "Scheme" Green is trying to remove: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh7c7...

Roaming Millennial's channel is here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLUr...


NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: OBAMA ON RACE: “I AM SADDENED THAT WHITES ARE STILL SUPERIOR….THINGS COULD EXPLODE”

NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO-OBAMA ON RACE: 

“I AM SADDENED THAT WHITES ARE STILL SUPERIOR….THINGS COULD EXPLODE”

President whines about white privilege 

in newly uncovered 1990 footage

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/never-before-seen-video-obama-on-race-i-am-saddened-that-whites-are-still-superior-things-could-explode/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Never before seen video provided exclusively to Infowars shows President Barack Obama complaining about white privilege during a 1990 trip to Kenya.
The footage, filmed and narrated by Obama’s sister Auma, shows the president on his first trip to Kenya as a young man in his 20s. Michelle Obama also accompanied her husband on the trip.
Crowdfunding platform WeSearchr provided the video exclusively to Infowars.
Obama says in the film: “I’m deeply saddened by a sense that whites are still superior in this country, in some sense, that if you sit at a restaurant, they’re served before a Kenyan is served. If you go through customs, a white person is going to have an easier time going through customs.”
Obama also warns that “things could explode at any point” as a result of the resentment black Kenyans have towards white people.
At one point in the movie Obama says he has “a lot at stake” in building “a strong black country in Kenya.”
Elsewhere, the footage shows white and Asian tourists visiting poor Kenyan villagers, a sight that offends Obama, who refused to join them on the tour according to his sister.
“These strangers move about our country as a matter of course, with disturbing confidence,” she states in the video, complaining that her people “are being exhibited” for the entertainment of the tourists.
Obama’s 1990 comments are fascinating given the fact that his presidency has been tainted by some of the worst race relations in America for decades, fueled by police shootings and riots in Ferguson, Baltimore and Charlotte.
“The film is full of insights into Barack Obama’s psychology and worldview, especially with regards to the way he sees his family in Kenya and black-white race relations,” said WeSearchr’s Chuck Johnson, adding, “How much of a black nationalist do you think Obama is? What do you think he thinks of white people?”
Obama’s remarks in the video will provide further ammunition for his critics, who claim that the president has used the office to stoke racial division, especially given his sympathies towards ‘Black Lives Matter’, a group whose ideological inspiration is a convicted cop killer on the FBI’s ‘Most Wanted Terrorists’ list.
Thanks to Chuck Johnson and https://www.wesearchr.com/ for providing the footage, which cost $10,000 to obtain – please donate to them via their website.