Wednesday, July 22, 2015

EDUCATION BILLS SOLIDIFY FEDERAL CONTROL OF SCHOOLS & CHILDREN~CHARLOTTE ISERBYT SPEECH AT MAINE STATE HOUSE & COMMENTS ON PASSAGE OF BILLS

EDUCATION BILLS SOLIDIFY FEDERAL CONTROL OF SCHOOLS & CHILDREN
BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/21293-education-bills-solidify-federal-control-of-schools-children; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In brazen defiance of the enumerated powers listed in the U.S. Constitution that all lawmakers swore an oath to uphold, both houses of Congress passed massive “education” bills packed with attacks on real education, local control of schools, student and family privacy, and the rights of parents. Despite false campaign promises by Republicans to rein in the Obama administration, the legislation passed by the GOP majority purports to reauthorize a dizzying array of unconstitutional federal “education” schemes — including draconian tools Obama has lawlessly used to nationalize education through thehugely unpopular Common Core standards. The White House has already indicated that it supports the legislation and will sign it, but critics are up in arms.  
Perhaps the most important element of the legislation is that it reauthorizes the anti-constitutional Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 — the primary mechanism used by Washington, D.C., to usurp control over education from parents and communities. In essence, the measure opened the floodgates of federal funding for government schools, and with those funds, which come with “strings” attached, D.C. politicians and bureaucrats formally launched their plan to federalize public schools. The ESEA scheme was amended and made even more draconian by the almost universally reviled “No Child Left Behind” Act, implemented by a coalition including Ted Kennedy and George W. Bush. That program was crucial in forcing states to impose a radical testing regime that was ultimately used to federalize what is taught in schools.   
Legal authorization for No Child Left Behind actually ended in 2008, yet Congress continues to appropriate funds for it. Just as importantly, the Obama administration continues to exploit the non-existent authority to usurp even more control over schools and the minds of children — offering “waivers” from the “mandates,” along with bribes, to state governments that agree to impose the Obama-backed Common Core regime.
In Ronald Reagan’s day, abolishing the federal role in education was the Republican position. By contrast, the GOP majority in Congress today seems determined to expand that giant D.C. boot print, as is shown clearly by the “education” bills, which further empower Obama. The latest bills even purport to legitimize the White House’s previous usurpations of power in violation of the law.
Ironically, much of the present Republican establishment’s rhetoric focused on pretending that the legislation would “give” states authorities and “flexibility” on education — powers the states already had and still have under the U.S. Constitution and the 10th Amendment, and powers that are not the federal government’s to “give” in the first place. “The needs of a student in eastern Kentucky aren’t likely to be the same as those of students in south Florida or downtown Manhattan,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said on the Senate floor. “This bill would give states the flexibility to develop systems that work for the needs of their students, rather than the one-size-fits-all mandate of Washington.”   
Of course, Washington has no authority to “mandate” anything on education, because the states never delegated any power to Washington over education in the U.S. Constitution. That means the 10th Amendment specifically prohibits any federal involvement in education at all, and especially purported “mandates.” To anti-constitutional politicians in Washington, though, the Constitution they all swore to uphold and defend apparently means nothing — assuming, of course, that they have even read it.
Regardless, the bills that advanced in Congress would expand controls and federal funding for “charter” schools, unleash intrusive bureaucracies seeking insight into your child’s mind via psychological and psychiatric testing, push to get even younger children in government hands, and much more.    
On July 16, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed S. 1177, more commonly referred to as the “Every Child Achieves Act” (ECAA). Just 17 senators, mostly conservative- or libertarian-leaning Republicans, voted against the bill. Before that, on July 9, the U.S. House narrowly approved the “Student Success Act,” described by American Principles Project Education Executive Director Emmett McGroarty as “one of the most far-reaching pieces of domestic legislation.” Now, the massive, radical bills go to conference committee to iron out the differences between the two versions so a final package can be sent to Obama to be signed into law.
The White House is pleased and plans to sign it, despite Congress not giving the administration the full range of powers it was demanding. “S. 1177, the Every Child Achieves Act, is an important step forward in the process of reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB),” the White House said in a statement. “The Administration appreciates the bipartisan effort that produced this legislation.” The White House also said it “applauds the bipartisan commitment in S. 1177 to expand opportunities for America's children to attend high-quality preschool.”
Critics, though, are raging against the legislation. Liberty-minded Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.), for example, said in a statement that he was honored to stand up for parental rights by voting against it. “The bill increases federal control of education,” he explained, noting that the bill reauthorizes the lapsed No Child Left Behind scheming, with some modifications, for the first time in years, and that Congress should instead simply stop funding it all. He pointed out that the key selling points being touted by Republicans to advance the bill — that it “prohibits” using funds to coerce states on Common Core and that it allows parents to “opt out” of federal testing mandates — would both be accomplished by voting no on the bill. The Senate version does not include the “opt out” provision, which was voted down.  
In the Senate, liberty-minded Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) also blasted the federal control over education purportedly authorized in the bill. “Not only did the Senate miss an opportunity to put states back in control of education policy, but the Every Child Achieves Act also expands the Department of Education’s role in early education policies,” he said in a statement. “Some have argued that this bill creates new protections for states who want to resist Washington dictates on curriculum or testing. But current law already includes similar protections and the Obama administration has already blatantly ignored those.… Utah parents have been asking for a new direction on education, but unfortunately this bill only gives them more of the same.”
In one of the broadest widely circulated criticisms of key elements of the legislation, education activist Christel Swasey outlined six specific “evil” elements of the bill — any single one of which should have been enough to quash the bill, at least if lawmakers were serious about their oath of office, the Constitution, or the wishes of their constituents. Among the chief complaints, which she lists along with the relevant sections of the legislation, are: “The bill aims to kill parental rights in the parental opt-out movement”; “The bill’s master-servant relationship between Fed Ed and State Ed is unconstitutional”; “The bill will suppress student expression of religious and political values”; “The bill sees government, not families, at the center of the universe — for younger and younger people, for more and more of the time”; “The bill promotes federal definitions of mental health and promotes collection of mental health data”; and “Toddler Snatching.”
“In my own mind I have given all its versions this name: Nasty Orwellian Progressive Education (NOPE) — a convenient, more honest, and recyclable title,” Swasey wrote in the Education Without Representation blog in her analysis of the 800-page Senate version of the legislation. “The hide and seek that readers must wield with the real purposes and powers of this bill is ridiculous. Clearly, the authors of S.1177 aim to obscure its true purposes, which I now see only serve the Obama-UN agenda for education. The media’s calling S.1177 ‘a bipartisan compromise’ but that’s far from true. It’s all part of the Common Core bipartisan profiteering scheme that aligns federal tests and standards, but elbows out parents and voters.… The power struggle is no longer between the Republicans and the Democrats. Bipartisan means almost nothing. The fight is between voting families — We the People, whether Democratic, Republican or other — versus the clique of profiteering businessmen and politicians.”   
Deliberate Dumbing Down of America author Charlotte Iserbyt, also a former senior policy advisor at the U.S. Department of Education, sounded the alarm on the charter-school component of the legislation. Blasting as the “huge elephant in the Senate and House chambers” the agenda behind tax-funded school-choice and charter-schools, which do not have elected boards yet use public funds, Iserbyt said the real goal was to prepare Americans for global tyranny. “HR 5 and S. 117 are not education bills. They are communist limited learning for lifelong labor bills,” she said, citing a wide array of publications on the issue going back generations. “We need people to start using proper adjectives, and then we will start winning,” she told The New American in a phone interview. “This is communism.” Indeed, more than a few foreign governments have used exactly the same strategy — tax funding for supposedly non-government schools — to usurp full control of education and quash all available alternatives. Even homeschoolers will be impacted, Iserbyt said.   
By stuffing the radical bill with handouts and benefits for special-interest groups with powerful lobbyists — and especially tax-funded “charter” schools and crony-capitalist testing mega-companies — proponents of the agenda to federalize schools and further dumb down Americans have made great progress. The agenda is clear: D.C. wants to decide what your children learn and how they learn it, at younger and younger ages, and it wants to know every detail about your child’s views, attitudes, psychological profile, and beliefs so “interventions” can change them. The agenda to shower crony special interests with public funds is transparent, too, and should be firmly resisted — especially considering that the federal government is already drowning the American people in impossible-to-pay debt.   
Republicans ran on a platform of reining in the White House, and yet, these education bills hand the administration virtually everything it wants — and then some — all in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Instead of passing a “compromise” bill once the House and Senate versions are put together, members of Congress should obey their oath of office and get the federal government completely out of education. That can happen by stopping all funding for federal education bureaucracies and programs — no bill is even needed, so Obama cannot veto it. At the state level, meanwhile, activists concerned with proper education should ensure that state and local officials refuse federal bribes and the mandates attached to them. They should also work to abolish state education agencies, as well. Not only do those federally funded bureaucracies serve as conduits for federal mandates to be imposed on local schools, they also usurp communities’ rights to self-government and to provide real education without external meddling. The federal government and its allies have done enough to destroy education. It is time for real change — and real education.
 Related articles:
Common Core: People vs. Big Government, Big Business, and Billionaires
___________________________________________________________

CHARLOTTE ISERBYT'S STATEMENT 

ON S1177 PASSAGE

SEE: http://abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.com/2015/07/charlotte-iserbyts-statement-on-s1177.html; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

#NoWayESEA

CHARLOTTE ISERBYT'S WARNING ON S1177 PASSAGE 7-18-15

Charlotte Iserbyt's Warning On S1177 Passage

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Iserbyt_071715.mp3

All information regarding this bill is at abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.com (the last two posts) and at Rense.com, scroll to "America's Tragedy" and "Death of Local Control".  

S1177, the Every Child Achieves Act, received 81 yes votes, 17 no votes, and 2 not voting.

The following Senators voted NO:  Blunt, R/ MO; Booker, D/ NJ; Crapo, R/ID; Cruz, R/TX; Daines, R/MT; Flake, R/AZ; Lee, R/UT; Moran, R/KS; Murphy, D/CT; Paul, R/KY; Riseh, R/ID; Rubio, R/FL; Sasse, R/NE; Scott, R/SC; Shelby, R/AL; Vitter, R/LA; Warren, D/MA; NOT voting were Graham, R/SC, Nelson, D/FL.

We should thank those voting NO since S1177 is NOT an education bill.          

We should also thank the thousands of grassroots Americans who did everything possible to get a NO vote on both Rep. Kline's HR5 and Sen. Alexander's S1177 legislation.  We almost killed HR 5; lost by 5 votes.  
I personally, for the grassroots, want to thank Jeff Rense for allowing the grassroots NO WAY ESEA message to get out.Without Jeff, we would never have come so close to defeating HR 5.  

 HR 5 and S1177 ARE NOT EDUCATION BILLS. THEY ARE COMMUNIST LIMITED LEARNING FOR LIFELONG LABOR BILLS! which originated in  Carnegie Corp. books (1934), in the United Nations, UNESCO and the Office of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.   They are part of UN Agenda 21.

The global workforce training agenda was resurrected during the Reagan and Bush Administrations, later supported by Clinton and Bush,Jr. and now Obama.  Workforce training is a major part of the world government/UNAgenda 21 plan.
As C.S. Lewis said:  When training beats education civilization dies.

The goal is to use the world's children to spin off profits for the global elite.
This international workforce training agenda is for ALL children on this planet.
Homeschooled children are targetted in  original New American School Development Corp  documents related to charter schools.  

This agenda is supported by the national and international chambers of commerce, the CFR, the multinational corporations, both political parties at the top,  the leadership of teachers unions (not teachers) and neoconservative organizations.  The Archbishop of Omaha, Nebraska, George . bishop, Chairman, Committee on Catholic education, an address to House of Representatives, and in a letter dated 2/23/15, recommended passage of  Republican Rep. Kline's HR 5, the Student Success Act.  Other Protestant religious groups, etc. have expressed support for these bills.

The National Alliance of Business in the nineties called for Kindergarten-Age 80 workforce training and community service.

S1177 includes, aside from workforce training, a heavy emphasis on  Communist Core Marxist curriculum and testing. THE TRADITIONAL ACADEMIC CURRICULUM HAS BEEN REDUCED TO 10% OF WHAT IT ORIGINALLY WAS.  I BELIEVE THE COMMON CORE IS THE LATE UN UNDERSECRETARY ROBERT MULLER'S WORLD CORE (NEW AGE) CURRICULUM. 

S1177  includes provision of all community services (lifelong), especially mental health services (brainwashing for correct political values) birth through death, and "Soviet-style" early childhood education,  under the unelected school superintendent.  These hub of community schools are going in all over the country.    They are Hillary Clinton's "It Takes A village to Raise a Child" philosophy. Google Georgia Visions.

S1177 includes extensive privacy-invading data collection related to Communist Core Assessment/mental health remediation.  This data will be used for employment and other purposes. 

The unelected council form of government (regionalism/communism) is a requirement.  The call for tax-funded school choice and charters with unelected boards is found throughout S1177.   
Tax-funded school choice and charters without elected school boards are necessary for the workforce plan to be implemented.  
Tax-funded school choice and charters are also international and are found all over the world.

The call is also being made, in other prominent circles, (Marc Tucker, Carnegie)  to move education funding from the local property tax to the state level to be administered by unelected council, and to get rid of locally elected school boards; recommendation to move decision making to the state level.

STATE EDUCATION CONTROL IS MORE DANGEROUS NOW THAN FEDERAL CONTROL.   HR. 5 AND S1177 ARE BOTH ABOUT GIVING POWER TO THE STATE DEPTS OF EDUCATION, UNELECTED WORKFORCE TRAINING BOARDS AND  COMMISSIONS.   THIS MAKES MUCH SENSE IF EDUCATION IS NO LONGER EDUCATION, BUT IS WORKFORCE TRAINING WHICH HAS TO BE MANAGED FROM THE STATE LEVEL WITH COOPERATION OF CORPORATIONS AND UNELECTED COUNCILS.

Neoconservative organizations withheld their opposition to HR 5 and S1177 until the very last minute when they felt the bills might be killed.  Their coming on board at last minute was simply to take credit for killing them.  HR 5 passed by only 5 votes!!!!!!!I understand the same neoconservative organizations that did not oppose HR5 and S1177 until the very last minute are planning a campaign to abolish the U.S. Dept. of Education. 

Why now when the federal Dept. of Education, after 35 years, has accomplished its job of funding and controlling all the State Depts of Education?   Where were these groups in the early 80s when Reagan was supposed to abolish the Department of Education?  Why now when most power has been shifted to the states? 

DO NOT RESPOND TO THEIR SLICK PLEAS FOR DONATIONS TO BRING DOWN THE U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION.
Here is a partial list of neocon groups:   Heritage, Eagle Forum, Heartland, Freedom Works, American Principles, Women on the Wall, Pioneer, et al.  Many of them funded by the Koch Brothers.  These are Trotskyite organizations.   Trotsky was a communist, not a conservative.          

Americans must cease their affiliation with and financial support for the neoconservative organizations that support tax-funded school choice and charter schools with unelected boards and the school-to-work agenda.  Concerned Americans must work as individuals, NOT in a group that can be infiltrated.  That does not mean you cannot have a very loose knit organization that cannot be identified.  Please contact me for help on this score.

Concerned Americans should  focus instead on getting legislation passed in their states to abolish their State Departments of Education which have been financially and politically enabled since 1965.  They take their orders from the Carnegie Corporation, the National Governors Association,  the Education Commission of the States, and many other lesser known associations.  

LOCAL CONTROL IS NOT STATE CONTROL.    SENATE HEARINGS ON S1177 INCLUDED MULTIPLE COMMENTS FROM SENATORS TO EFFECT POWER MUST BE RETURNED TO THE STATE LEVEL.  STATE LEVEL IS NOT LOCAL LEVEL.          

KEEP IT THAT WAY.  GET LEGISLATION PASSED IN YOUR STATES TO ABOLISH YOUR STATE'S DEPT. OF EDUCATION!!!!

KEEP EDUCATION AT THE LOCAL, LOCAL LEVEL WITH  ELECTED BOARDS AND FUNDING THROUGH THE PROPERTY TAX.

AMERICA HAS LOST HER CONSCIENCE 

RED ALERT RED ALERT RED ALERT #8 

WAKE UP HOMESCHOOLERS: THEY'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN !!! 
____________________________________________________________

CHARLOTTE ISERBYT SPEAKS 
AT MAINE STATE HOUSE
FEBRUARY 17, 2015
Published on Mar 1, 2015
Videographer: Hal Shurtleff

AUGUSTA, ME-- Charlotte Iserbyt speaks at the Maine State House on the dangers of the Article V Convention of States (con con) and touches upon HR5 legislation, which is the reauthorization of ESEA and continuation of the federal takeover of education. February 17, 2015

H.R. 5 does not enable states to completely opt out of the programs that fall under No Child Left Behind. The bill does not include language that would allow states to opt out of all the programs that fall under NCLB, along with the law’s mandates, and utilize those dollars for any lawful education purpose under state law.

H.R. 5 does not eliminate programs or reduce spending. The bill consolidates more than 65 programs into a Local Academic Flexible Grant, which requires states to submit detailed documentation, follow prescriptive rules, and comply with onerous reporting requirements. This is not a block grant. Furthermore, H.R. 5 does not appreciably reduce spending in relation what was actually spent.

H.R. 5 does not eliminate all the burdensome federal mandates. Although the proposal wisely eliminates counterproductive and prescriptive Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) mandates, H.R. 5 maintains the current NCLB mandates for states to establish standards in reading and math and to test kids annually between grades 3-8 and once in high school. H.R. 5 orders that academic achievement standards “include the same knowledge, skills, and levels of achievement expected of all public school students in the state.” States must also use “the same academic assessments…to measure the academic achievement of all public school students in the state.” Taken together, these twin mandates direct the state to establish a single uniform assessment, limiting the ability of local schools to determine their own curriculum.

H.R. 5 does not provide states the option of full Title 1 portability. H.R. 5 provides increased portability, but only to public schools and public charter schools. Adequate portability would extend to private schools of choice, if a state chose.

Source: Heritage Action
http://heritageaction.com/key-votes/n...

Lobbying against the ESEA reauthorization:
http://abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.com/20...



at

ATF & FBI GUN GRABBERS PREY ON VETS, ELDERLY~POLICE "WELLNESS CHECKS" (RAIDS) TRIGGERED BY YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS CREATE AN EXCUSE TO ILLEGALLY ENTER YOUR HOME


Government Gun Grabbers Prey on Vets and Elderly;
Threats Made Against Military Recruitment Centers Across America
YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS WILL BE USED TO RAID YOUR HOME & SEIZE YOUR GUNS
BEWARE OF POLICE "WELLNESS CHECKS"
Published on Jul 22, 2015
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is involved in a government effort to disarm America’s veterans and seniors who may lack the capacity to manage their finances.

And it’s not just veterans facing this scrutiny: now it’s anybody who gets Social Security.

New documents obtained by The Daily Caller reveal that ATF, a division of the Department of Justice, is working with the FBI and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to enter veterans who get VA benefits into the government’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System.



UN Calls for RFID Chips and Biometric Tracking of Guns and Ammo

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



At a recent meeting of government representatives of nations participating in the United Nations’ Programme of Action (POA), the focus was on tracking of civilian weapons, component parts, and ammunition, and how the United States should spend more money helping foreign countries accomplish those goals.



At the Second Meeting of Governmental Experts (MGE2) held at the UN headquarters in Manhattan, the globalists discussed a couple of agenda items that should give pause to Americans.



First, the delegates at the MGE2 deliberated on how to eliminate the threat of technologically advanced weapons, including so-called polymer firearms and 3D printed guns, as well as the tracking of materials used in the “craft-production of small arms and light weapons.” 



Not surprisingly, the representative from China called for increased UN-mandated regulations on 3D printers and the weapons they produce.



In the Chair’s Summary, the group united in a call for “strengthening 3D printing regulations in the context of 3D weapon printing,” for “ensuring export licenses [are] in place for 3D printers,” for drawing global attention to “the need to pay attention to the resale of such printers,” and for “strengthening controls over 3D printing technology.”



No one is shocked, of course, that the globalists at the UN want to draw up comprehensive plans to take guns — any and every variety of gun — out of the hands of civilians.



After discussing similar strategies to lock down the manufacture, purchase, sale, and transfer of polymer weapons and modular weapons, the next item on the MGE2 attendees’ agenda warrants an immediate withdrawal of the United States from the world body.



Paragraph 33 of the Chair’s Summary of the meeting calls for urgent tracking of civilian-owned firearms, recommending that manufacturers be forced by the UN to install “RFID and biometric technologies in limiting the access to the weapon to authorized users only,” with authorized users defined as state actors (UN member nations).



That’s right. As part of the Programme of Action (the foundation upon which the Arms Trade Treaty is built), the United States has committed to passing legislation that will require domestic firearms and ammunition manufacturers to equip their products with RFID chips and biometric technologies that will help the government slowly but surely disarm civilians.



That’s not all. At the end of that paragraph, the UN suggests states (member countries) look into combining RFID chips, biometrics, with GPS tracking technologies to be sure to prevent regular people from getting their hands on guns.



Next, in the overview of the published summary of the conference, the UN looks to one source to help pay for the implementation of these new disarmament policies: increased foreign aid.



Specifically, the unelected, unaccountable UN globocrats call for greater “international cooperation and assistance” (read: American taxpayer dollars) to offset the massive cost of the “transfer of technology and knowledge” necessary to make the proposed gun grab a reality.



It should be noted that Paragraph 42 of the summary proposes funding this fascism “through the UN regular budget,” 22 percent of which is paid by the United States, through a process that can be described as nothing less than legalized theft of the wealth of the American worker.



As if the point was already made, the document calls for the cultivating of a “culture of peace,” which is certainly shorthand for flooding the United States with UN-created propaganda linking the civilian ownership of firearms with homicide and other violent crimes. 



In the wake of the horrific Chattanooga murders, it doesn’t take too much foresight to predict a panoply of renewed calls for controlling and regulating civilian access to firearms.



Finally, according to the text of the latest draft of the agreement, the POA will serve as an “international instrument to enable states to identify and trace, in a timely and reliable manner,” the small arms and light weapons that are the subject of the scheme.



In practice, this means that the governments of member nations (including the United States) will soon create a massive, all-inclusive database of all parties that manufacture, own, sell, trade, or transfer arms and ammunition.



If recent history is a reliable indicator of how such data would be used, after the catalog is complete, Congress could pass a law (or the president could issue an executive order) compelling “voluntary” surrender of privately-owned weapons, ammo, parts, and components (including reloading equipment). If, after a statutorily-set window, citizens don’t turn in these items to their local law enforcement, then officers will be sent to remind violators of their responsibility under the law to disarm.



Paragraph 32 of the Chair’s Summary lays out the plan for “real-time tracking” of firearms and ammunition “from manufacturer to storage and from storage up to the individual users.” 



Once the governments of the member nations begin tracking and confiscating weapons from civilians, the Programme of Action (paragraphs 30 and 31) mandates that member governments take “direct control over transfers of small arms and light weapons.” 



This control will require the federal government to begin stockpiling these items and making a database of the recently impounded guns, bullets, 3D printers, plastics, polymers, and component parts.



This database must include "the marking, record-keeping and tracing of weapons, and in this regard considered barcodes, radio frequency identification (RFID) and biometrics for purposes of electronically identifying stored items, collecting data on them and enabling the data to be entered automatically into record-keeping systems."



It is evident from a reading of this latest UN disarmament publication that despite the rhetoric related to ”promotion of a culture of peace,” there are only two reasons the UN is making every effort to disarm the population of the United States: to weaken our sovereignty, and to take from our people their ability to resist those despots (at home and abroad) who would place us under the boot of tyranny and demote us to the ranks of slaves on a “sustainable” global plantation.



The next round of meetings for hammering out the details of the Programme of Action is scheduled for 2016. That gives Americans almost one year to convince their representatives in Congress to pass legislation defunding the UN and forcing the world-government-in-waiting to relocate to a more hospitable home.



Americans interested in joining this fight are encouraged to look into The John Birch Society (JBS). For nearly four decades, the JBS has worked to “Get US out of the UN.” Therefore, the group is uniquely equipped with the resources necessary to finally achieve this urgent aim.



















at




































SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENTS: ALL GUNS WILL BE TAKEN!~BIG BROTHER BARACK WANTS YOU IN A RACE DATABASE TO DETERMINE RACIAL DISPARITIES 














Social Security Recipients! 
All Guns Will Be Taken! Disabled, Mentally Ill, Troubled, Just Too Old? You Must Surrender Them!





Published on Jul 22, 2015





With the clock ticking on 18 months left in his Presidency, President Obama is determined to cause considerable damage to the second amendment rights of the good citizens of the United States before he leaves office.

The LA Times reported, “The push is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws regulating who gets reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, which is used to prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the country illegally and others. A potentially large group within Social Security are people who, in the language of federal gun laws, are unable to manage their own affairs due to "marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease."

Roughly 4.2 million will be dropped into the same database system that the Veterans Administration is using to come and take it.
Determining whether someone is unfit to carry a gun will be open to sloppy interpretation as it could include those who don’t pose a danger to anyone, but may not be able to remember names quickly or balance their checkbook.

Data bases are being created on every red blooded American whether you own a firearm or not.

The New York Post reported, “Unbeknownst to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.”

While our borders are wide open and we are increasingly under attack by foreign and domestic terrorism. Not by Veterans or Grandpa protecting his small piece of the American pie. But by radicalized muslim extremists and pharmaceutical induced psychotic Americans. Obama wants our guns? I can’t think of a time when Americans needed them more. And according to the recent explosion of gun sales, neither can Americans.



________________________________________________________







DETERMINING RACIAL DISPARITIES



YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD FAILS THE INTEGRATION SCORE





























































at



































GENERAL WESLEY CLARK CALLS FOR PREEMPTIVE CAMP INTERNMENT OF AMERICAN "WOULD BE" RADICALIZED TERRORISTS EVEN BEFORE ANY ANTI-AMERICAN ACTS ARE COMMITTED~NO MENTION OF ISLAMIC TERRORISTS THOUGH












YOU FIT THE PROFILE OF A WOULD BE RADICALIZED TERRORIST, AND YOU WILL BE INDEFINITELY HOUSED AT A CAMP BUILT JUST FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU



                        



MODELED AFTER THE WORLD WAR II CAMPS FOR JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS







General Clark Calls for WWII-type Internment Camps for U.S. Citizens





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:





“If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right, and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”



Thus spoke retired General Wesley Clark, a former Democratic Party presidential candidate, in an interview on MSNBC this past Friday.



Back in 2004, Clark, the former supreme allied commander of NATO, was harshly critical of what he considered the Bush administration's excessive response to the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.



But since then, he has drastically altered his position, now strongly supporting the use of domestic internment camps, specifically citing those where Americans of Japanese ancestry were sent during World War II. (There were also camps for Germans and Italians, but in much smaller numbers.)



While many would have agreed with Clark's earlier assessment that Bush went too far in his reaction to the 9/11 attacks, citing actions such as the PATRIOT Act’s reduction of civil liberties, Bush never suggested anything nearly as sweeping as that now proposed by Clark.



One can certainly understand arresting, trying, and incarcerating any person conspiring to commit acts of violence inside the United States; however, Clark’s proposal is chilling to constitutionalists. He is advocating going after those who are not only not involved in a conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, but who have not even yet been radicalized. “We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized," he asserted. "We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning."



“I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists,” Clark added.



Americans are understandably concerned about Islamic terrorism. Those who either commit  or conspire to commit acts of violence should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But the idea of sending to internment camps those who might become radicalized, and might conspire to commit violence is absolutely chilling.



Once such a precedent has been set, who might the next target of the federal government be? The Obama administration considers members of patriotic organizations such as The John Birch Society, Eagle Forum, and the Tea Party to be extremists. Some even regard pro-lifers or evangelical Christians as “radicals.”



Who would decide which individuals would be sent to these internment camps? During World War II — Clark’s model — it was one man: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.



Following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, commanding that Japanese Americans be relocated away from the West Coast and into internment camps — without any due process, proof of disloyalty, or regard to American citizenship. This draconian policy led to the eventual incarceration of over 100,000 people, 62 percent of whom were U.S. citizens.



After Japan's “Meiji Restoration” in 1868, in which Emperor Meiji wrested power back from the warlords and began the modernization and industrialization of his country, many Japanese had taken advantage of the opportunity to emigrate to the United States.



In 1936, as relations between the United States and Japan were souring, Roosevelt directed the Office of Naval Intelligence to create a list of “those who would be the first to be placed in concentration camps in the event of trouble” between Japan and the United States.



However, as the two nations moved closer to war, Charles Munson of Naval Intelligence delivered a report on November 7, 1941, that “certified a remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group.” FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover supported Munson’s findings, contending to Roosevelt that the Japanese posed no espionage threat.



Despite this, FDR issued his order and appointed Lt. General John DeWitt, head of Western Command, the administrator of the internment program. “A Jap’s a Jap,” DeWitt explained, when reporters queried him about “loyal” Americans who just happened to have Japanese ancestry. DeWitt told Congress, “I don’t want any of them here. They are a dangerous element.... It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen; he is still a Japanese.... But we must worry about the Japanese all the time until he is wiped off the map.”



The attorney general of California — Earl Warren, later the chief justice of the Supreme Court — argued for the federal government to remove all Japanese from the West Coast. On February 2, 1942, the Los Angeles Timeseven editorialized of those Americans of Japanese ancestry, “A viper is nonetheless a viper, wherever the egg is hatched.”



Some of the interned Japanese chose to join the U.S. armed forces, ironically to “fight for liberty,” and were sent to the European theater. The bulk of them fought in the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, which emerged from the war as the most highly decorated U.S. military unit of its size, earning the nickname “the Purple Heart division.” Historian John Toland tells the story of an American prisoner of war who witnessed a battle between Germans and the 442nd. When a German soldier expressed to him surprise that they were having to fight Japanese, the American soldier advised the German that he'd been taken in by Hitler’s propaganda. The Japanese, he informed the German, are really on “our side.”



While the 442nd fought for America, most Americans of Japanese blood languished in the camps, which were cramped, with little room for privacy. One camp in Wyoming even had unpartitioned toilets. As the war progressed, conditions did improve in the camps, and life went on, with schools, such as they were, activities, including baseball games, and the like.



Eventually it became obvious that the incarceration had no good purpose; however, FDR opted to delay the release of the interned prisoners until January of 1945, so as not to endanger his reelection chances in 1944. In this decision he ignored the advice of both FBI Director Hoover and War Relocation Authority (WRA) director Dillon Myer that the internment should end in 1944.



The WWII internment camps are just what General Clark has in mind as a model for today. And he is not alone. Prominent neoconservative Daniel Pipes has called internment “a good idea” which offers “lessons for today.” And Michelle Malkin, in her book In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror, was blunt, declaring: “Civil liberties are not sacrosanct.”



Despite the clear protections of civil liberties in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, in 1944 the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in the case of Korematsu v. the United States that the internment camps did not violate the Constitution.



Former Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark, who assisted the U.S. Department of Justice in effecting the “relocation” of the Japanese, addressed this issue in the epilogue of his 1992 book, Executive Order 9066: The Internment of 110,000 Japanese-Americans:



The truth is — as this deplorable experience proves — that constitutions and laws are not sufficient of themselves.... Despite the unequivocal language of the Constitution of the United States that the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, and despite the Fifth Amendment’s command that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, both of the constitutional safeguards were denied by military action under Executive Order 9066.



The actual “lesson for us today” is not that we need to reimplement internment camps, but rather that all American citizens must develop a renewed respect for the protection of their civil liberties enshrined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
























at