Translate

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

WILL JOEL OSTEEN OFFER HELP TO HOUSTON FLOOD VICTIMS OR KEEP HIS LAKEWOOD MEGA-CHURCH DOORS SHUT?

 FALSE PREACHER SHOWS NO MERCY!
WILL JOEL OSTEEN OFFER HELP TO HOUSTON FLOOD VICTIMS OR KEEP HIS CHURCH DOORS SHUT? 
 Published on Aug 28, 2017
Joel Osteen in lieu of opening to doors to his church to help those in need, he took to Twitter.
 Megachurch Pastor Responds To Criticism For Not Opening Doors To Harvey Victims

Published on Aug 29, 2017
Joel Osteen, the owner of a Houston megachurch, has responded to an onslaught of criticism after the pastor allegedly refused to open his massive Lakewood Church to those seeking shelter from Hurricane Harvey. Late Monday, Osteen said in a statement that he never shut his doors to those in need. He also shared pictures that appear to show that the church's parking garage and surrounding area had experienced flooding, in an attempt to back up claims that the church was "inaccessible." However, several videos posted on Twitter seem to show the location, which seats thousands, unscathed by flooding.
 PROOF LAKEWOOD CHURCH NOT FLOODED:
Lakewood church rests on the highest elevation in the city so I don't buy the lie that it was flooded.
 HURRICANE HARVEY : Joel Osteen Won't Open Mega Church To Help Flood Victims in Houston, Texas! 

Published on Aug 29, 2017
One of the most well known, and wealthiest church leaders in the world, Joel Osteen, is not openning his Houston, Texas based Mega Church, LakeWood Church, towards helping displaced flood victims in Hurricane Harvey.

Update: They are getting ready to finally taking people in. YAY Internet and putting pressure on places where it belongs!
 

WHY DID DEMOCRAT MAYOR ORDER HOUSTON, TEXAS STAND DOWN DURING HURRICANE CATASTROPHE, DEFYING TRUMP & GOVERNOR ABBOTT?

 Why Did Democrat Mayor Order Houston Stand Down During Hurricane Catastrophe?
 http://ww4.hdnux.com/photos/47/52/05/10396023/3/premium_landscape.jpg
 Americans Are Dying After Trump Hating Houston Mayor Defies President’s Hurricane Warnings 
 Published on Aug 28, 2017
Americans Are Dying After Trump-Hating Houston Mayor Defies President’s Hurricane Warnings

Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner is under heavy fire after he decided to use Hurricane Harvey as a political weapon to make President Donald Trump look bad. Turner, a hardcore liberal Democrat, reacted to the president’s dire hurricane warnings, telling Southeast Texans to evacuate, by making his own hurricane statement, and now, Americans are dying. You’ll be completely shocked by what this idiot mayor told the citizens of Houston, proving Democrats can never agree with Trump, even if lives are on the line.
Houston Mayor Sam Turner hates President Donald Trump so much he threw caution to the wind and tweeted out statements about Hurricane Harvey to downplay what the president had previously advised. On August 25th, it was quite evident that what faced Southeast Texas was a wall of water of biblical proportions, coming straight for them.


Trump immediately engaged his administration to start emergency procedures. The president tweeted at 8:46 am on August 25th, “I have spoken w/ @GovAbbott of Texas and @LouisianaGov Edwards. Closely monitoring #HurricaneHarvey developments & here to assist as needed,” followed by this tweet, “I encourage everyone in the path of #HurricaneHarvey to heed the advice & orders of their local and state officials.”

The GOP Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, was crystal clear in his message on August 25th, “I would urge everybody who has the possibility to consider evacuating as soon as possible.” Seeing the “Republican response” by Trump and Abbott, Mayor Turner played Russian roulette with the citizens of Houston, tweeting, “Ignore unfounded, unsourced weather predictions that are frightening Houstonians, Get info from trusted outlets.” At that point, everyone who had listened to the news knew a hurricane worse than Katrina was headed straight for Houston, but it mattered little to Turner, who found an opportunity to bash the president more important than the safety of his citizens. Unfortunately, that’s not all.

At the request of the Governor of Texas, I have signed the Disaster Proclamation, which unleashes the full force of government help!
While Trump was signing a national disaster proclamation, Turner doubled down and tweeted, “Please think twice before trying to leave Houston en masse. No evacuation orders have been issued for the city. #Harvey.” Turner himself was responsible for issuing the order of evacuation for Houston, but instead of doing that, he tweeted out a politicized message, and you guessed it, he never ordered evacuations. By the time Harvey hit Houston, it was too late.
Thanks to Turner’s political game playing, American citizens who could have gotten out remained trapped. This includes the most vulnerable; namely, the disabled, the elderly, and the kids. Even the local media could not ignore what Turner did, or rather, what he refused to do. In a Texas Tribune article titled, “Ahead of Hurricane Harvey, officials send Texans mixed messages on evacuations,” they report, “Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner told people living in the state’s largest city not to leave, citing ‘chaotic’ traffic from the 2005 evacuations ahead of Hurricane Rita.”

So, the question becomes, was Turner’s blatant politicized reaction to Hurricane Harvey something he did on his own or was this a larger narrative that the leftists are plotting against Trump? There’s no doubt Turner got his marching orders from the Democrats, who are hoping to blame American deaths from a natural disaster on Trump. They’re hoping for mass casualties like Hurricane Katrina, and they will then build a bogus narrative to make it appear like Trump caused the whole thing.

So far, the New York Times is reporting five are dead in Houston. That number will only grow. There were adequate warnings to mobilize emergency efforts to evacuate those most at risk, and Turner decided to ignore them. Since Hurricane Katrina, emergency services have trained for such a disaster as Harvey. But, when Democrats are more concerned with politicizing events in a “gotcha game” with Trump, American lives are expendable. This is how the globalists roll, but they are in for a big surprise. Americans won’t be fooled by this game playing. We demand answers from Turner and his Democratic masters. Blood is on their hands. They must be held accountable for their crimes.
 WHY DID DEMOCRAT MAYOR ORDER HOUSTON, TEXAS STAND DOWN DURING HURRICANE CATASTROPHE?
 Despite governor’s recommendations, 
Democrat officials ignored him
BY ADAN SALAZAR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Democrat Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner refused to issue evacuation orders for the city’s 2.3 million residents, even after Governor Greg Abbott had advised Texans to do so.
Despite Governor Abbott issuing a state of disaster declaration last Wednesday for Harris and 29 other Texas counties, Mayor Turner did not warn, inform or urge citizens to leave the area, parts of which have now been catastrophically devastated by over 30 inches of rain.


On Friday, Governor Greg Abbott advised, “Even if an evacuation order hasn’t been issued by your local official, if you’re in an area between Corpus Christi and Houston, you need to strongly consider evacuating.”
“If I were living in the Houston region, as I once did, I would decide to head to areas north of there,” he added.

On the other hand, “Mr. Turner, a Democrat, and other local officials urged residents to stay in their homes as Hurricane Harvey, which has since downgraded to a tropical storm, approached Houston on Friday,” reported The Wall Street Journal.
On Friday afternoon, Mayor Turner reiterated that no evacuation order had been issued for Houston.

Photos from Houston, the fourth most populous U.S. city, show the destructive aftermath of days of rain, daring water rescues, entire highways underwater and flooded out neighborhood streets.

On Friday ahead of the heavy rains, Harris County Judge Ed Emmett said, “The safest thing is to stay where you are and ride out the storm… We don’t anticipate any kind of massive evacuation.”
Emmett, a Republican top emergency official, later called criticism of the decision not to evacuate “outrageous,” and claimed residents would have laughed if they’d have issued the order.
“To suggest we should have evacuated two million people is an outrageous statement,” Emmett said. “What we’re facing now is an effort to respond to a tragedy… We’ve never seen water like this before.”
The judge went on to say an evacuation would have been “totally nonsensical.”
“If we had gone out three days before and said, ‘we want four million people to leave Harris County,’ that would have been a totally nonsensical thing to do,” he stated.
Hurricane Harvey has now been blamed for five deaths in the Houston area, and is the most major test the Trump administration has faced.
On Monday, city officials finally ordered mandatory and voluntary evacuations from certain areas.
Considering the Democrat playbook admittedly calls for “not letting a serious crisis go to waste,” some speculate Houstonians were sacrificed to make Trump look bad.






Was the mayor just negligent, or was this a stunt designed to embarrass Trump?




 

THE MARK OF THE BEAST HAS BEGUN: MAINLINE CHRISTIAN GROUPS BANNED FROM AMAZON, ETC. FOR COMMERCE

 https://pics.onsizzle.com/bans-christian-and-conservative-pages-allows-isis-to-recruit-on-2755781.png
THE MARK OF THE BEAST HAS BEGUN: MAINLINE CHRISTIAN GROUPS BANNED FROM AMAZON, ETC. 
FOR COMMERCE 
SHOWN BELOW: THE IMPLANTABLE RFID CHIP
 
Emergency! Purge Of Conservative Sites andPlatforms Has Begun

YOUTUBE SLAMS DAVID KNIGHT'S "REALNEWS" WITH AGE RESTRICTIONS

YOUTUBE SLAMS "REALNEWS" 
WITH AGE RESTRICTIONS
 Published on Aug 28, 2017
Oh, the irony! If you complain about the sexualization of Kindergarteners as age inappropriate, YouTube will slap an age restriction on your video. And Ron Paul is the latest to be demonetized by YouTube — as Julian Assange says, “economic censorship”.
 

TRUMP OWNS REPORTER ON EX-SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO PARDON

 http://www.lemonwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/trump-considers-arpaio-pardon-critics-call-out-president.jpg
TRUMP OWNS REPORTER 
ON EX-SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO PARDON 

NETANYAHU TELLS UN TOP DOG THAT IRAN IS BUILDING MISSILE SITES IN SYRIA, LEBANON TO STRIKE ISRAEL

NETANYAHU TELLS UN TOP DOG THAT IRAN IS BUILDING MISSILE SITES IN SYRIA, LEBANON 
TO STRIKE ISRAEL
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Given the UN’s track record regarding Israel, upon hearing this news, Guterres could probably scarcely contain his glee.

“Netanyahu tells UN chief Iran building missile production sites in Syria, Lebanon,” by Itamar Eichner, Ynet News, August 28, 2017:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres Monday that Iran is building sites to produce precision-guided missiles in Syria and Lebanon, with the aim of using them against Israel.
At the start of a meeting in Jerusalem, Netanyahu accused Iran of turning Syria into a “base of military entrenchment as part of its declared goal to eradicate Israel.”
“It is also building sites to produce precision-guided missiles towards that end, in both Syria and in Lebanon. This is something Israel cannot accept. This is something the UN should not accept,” Netanyahu said as the two spoke during a joint press conference.
Iran, Israel’s arch-enemy, has been Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s staunchest backer and has provided militia fighters and terror groups such as Hezbollah to help him in Syria’s civil war.
The prime minister lamented its “troubled relationship” with the UN, decrying what he described as an “absurd obsession with Israel,” which uses “flagrantly discriminatory tactics. You don’t have to be the Israeli prime minister to understand that, and I think people of good faith and common sense understand that.”
Netanyahu criticized the UN, saying that it fails to check Palestinian hate speech, “absurdly denies” Jewish connections to Jerusalem and has not stopped arms from reaching Hezbollah in Lebanon.
He was referring to a recent UN cultural agency resolution about Jerusalem that angered Israel after it failed to acknowledge Jewish ties with the city and recently denied Israeli sovereignty over the city.
Israel also criticized the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, for being too soft on Iranian-backed Hezbollah forces in the border area. The US recently backed Israel in its claims and suggested that more responsibilities be demanded of the group to curb Hezbollah’s activities….

AFTER CHARLOTTESVILLE, UN DEMANDS U.S. QUASH FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION

 http://bptnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/first2.jpg
AFTER CHARLOTTESVILLE, UN DEMANDS U.S. QUASH FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
While some of its leading member regimes behead Christians and chop body organs out of political prisoners, the United Nations issued an “early warning” to the United States and demanded illegal restrictions on free speech. As part of its decision, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), a body that includes communists and Islamists, lambasted the United States and President Donald Trump without actually mentioning his name. But critics were quick to ridicule the UN outfit amid growing calls for the U.S. government to withdraw from the widely criticized “dictators club.”    
In a press release blasting the United States for its alleged “failure to unequivocally reject racist violent events,” the UN CERD provided concrete evidence that it has either been watching too much "fake news," or that it is willing to lie in order to advance its fanatical anti-American, anti-freedom agenda. Not that it should matter to the UN, which has a charter specifically prohibiting involvement in nations' domestic affairs, but President Trump repeatedly condemned the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, racists, and others, along with the violent and terroristic communist forces that reportedly clashed with them in Virginia this month.
“Racism is evil,” Trump declared after the violence in Charlottesville. “And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.” Trump also denounced the violent “Antifa” extremists on the other side of the confrontation who, ironically, share much in common with their totalitarian-minded National Socialist nemeses.

Perhaps the UN never got the memo about Trump, though. “We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred,” complained radical left-wing activist Anastasia Crickley, the chairperson of UN CERD, in a widely publicized statement. “We call on the U.S. Government to investigate thoroughly the phenomenon of racial discrimination targeting, in particular, people of African descent, ethnic or ethno-religious minorities, and migrants.”
Beyond simply condemning speech, the UN also believes the U.S. government must wage a propaganda campaign to promote “tolerance” and “diversity,” two terms that globalists and leftists have weaponized to undermine liberty and promote open borders, globalism, perversion, and hate. According to the UN document, U.S. authorities must not only  “unequivocally and unconditionally reject and condemn racist hate speech and racist crimes in Charlottesville and throughout the country,” they must also “actively contribute to the promotion of understanding, tolerance, and diversity between ethnic groups, and acknowledge their contribution to the history and diversity of the United States of America.”
Perhaps even more alarming than the dictators club's brazen meddling in U.S. affairs, though, was the UN's hostile assault on the constitutionally protected, God-given rights of free speech, free expression, freedom of thought, and freedom of assembly. In multiple statements plastered across the UN's websites, the global outfit — dominated by unfree regimes and even mass-murdering tyrants — attacked the First Amendment head on. The statements demanded that the U.S. government restrict free speech and association, saying it called on authorities “to provide the necessary guarantees so that such rights are not misused to promote racist hate speech.”
As the UN knows, or should know, the U.S. Constitution that authorizes the U.S. government to exist in the first place specifically prohibits any compliance with the UN's outrageous demand. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” In other words, the UN is calling on U.S. authorities to violate the supreme law of the land to enforce an illegitimate and unconstitutional UN “convention.”  
Even the increasingly rogue U.S. Supreme Court has consistently ruled, including as recently as this summer, that even the most vile forms of speech are protected under the Constitution. “Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express the thought that we hate,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito in Matal v. Tam, a case dealing with the Washington Redskins, another target of UN hatred and illegal meddling by a coalition including numerous mass murderers and tyrants.  
Free speech is so universally accepted in America that even rogue radicals on the high court who pay virtually no attention to the Constitution have concluded the same thing. “A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an egregious form of content discrimination, which is presumptively unconstitutional,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy, the same official who helped invent a “right” to a “homosexual marriage” without any basis in law. “The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government's benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.”
Ironically, while the UN council demands the shredding of the U.S. Constitution that has protected the God-given rights of Americans relatively well for more than two centuries, the members of the UN CERD mostly come from poor, unfree nations where corruption, crime, violence, hatred, racism, intolerance, oppression, tyranny, and other social ills are endemic and always have been. For instance, the kangaroo committee purporting to sit in judgment over the United States consists of, among others, Communists and Islamists, along with a Soviet-trained Russian agent as its “rapporteur.” Seriously. That such forces would seek to undermine American freedom is no surprise.
The 18-member UN committee even includes a Yemhelhe Mohamed from Mauritania, an Islamist African country where mostly blacks were (and still are) openly enslaved mostly by Muslim Arabs and Berbers — a practice that was not even criminalized until a mere 10 years ago. Other nations represented include Communist China, where the brutal dictatorship has murdered more people than any other in human history, and where the ongoing cultural genocide of Tibet is well underway. Also on the list: Algeria, Burkina-Faso, Togo, Pakistan, Turkey, Brazil, Mauritius, and Guatemala. 
According to the UN's bombastic statements condemning and warning the United States, the UN outfit was acting under what is known as the “early warning and urgent action procedure.” Citing the largely engineered violence in Charlottesville, the UN outfit claimed its warning was “aimed at preventing existing situations escalating into conflicts and urgent procedures to respond to problems requiring immediate attention to prevent or limit the scale or number of serious violations of the Convention.”
Other nations scolded under the mechanism in recent years include war-ravaged Burundi, Iraq, Nigeria, and Sudan. Also on the list was the Ivory Coast, where jihadists backed by UN military power overthrew the elected Christian president, butchered thousands of Christians with machetes, and installed a globalist Muslim central banker in the presidency. Neither Russia nor China, where ethnic minorities often face fierce government persecution, were on the UN's list. Nor were the Sunni Arab regimes that consider converting to Christianity a capital offense. Nothing has been said by the panel about UN schools caught brainwashing Muslim children to wage violent jihad against Jews, either; or on the escalating crisis of UN troops raping mostly black children around the world with total impunity.
The latest UN screed demonizing the United States and demanding unconstitutional attacks on constitutionally guaranteed human rights is merely one example among many. During the Obama administration, the dictators club became increasingly bold, loudly demanding everything from the nationalization of police and propaganda in school textbooks to unconstitutional “robust gun control” and even a federal ban on spanking children. More recently, the UN even claimed repealing ObamaCare was a violation of “international law.” Of course, all of the UN's demands represent flagrant violations of the U.S. Constitution.
Much of the UN's extremism in attacking the United States and its constitutionally limited form of government has been justified by citing various UN schemes and agreements that globalists like to refer to as “international law.” Especially prominent is the UN “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” a list of revocable privileges that is essentially the opposite of the God-given rights enshrined in America's founding documents. For perspective, simply consider Article 29 of the UDHR, which states, among other ludicrous claims, that the UN-approved “rights and freedoms” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”
It is becoming increasingly clear to Americans that the dictators club has a totalitarian agenda for humanity, and that it must be stopped. Trump has proposed drastic cuts to the UN's budget. But unfortunately, that will not be nearly enough. As prominent conservative pundit Glenn Beck declared this week on his program, “it's time to shutter the United Nations, close it up ... stop paying for it.” Numerous other prominent Americans have made similar calls. And with the dictators club viciously maligning Trump and the nation that elected him to the presidency, critics of the UN hope the time has finally come to get the United States out of the UN, and the UN out of the United States.
Legislation to do just that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, or H.R. 193, has already been introduced in Congress. It is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. All that is needed to destroy the dictators club and its lawless attacks against America is sufficient public pressure on the American people's elected representatives. If there is one thing virtually all Americans remain united on, it is the cherished value of free speech. Perhaps the UN's shameful attack on this fundamental human right will be enough to get Congress and Trump to finally act against the lawless dictators club.

Related articles:
United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.
UN “Human Rights” Council Now Officially Controlled by Dictators
After Equating Trump With ISIS, UN Freaks Out Over His Victory
Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress
After Charlottesville, Globalist Rice Smears Patriots as Racists
UN Demands “Robust Gun Control” After Orlando Terror
UN: Jail Parents Who Spank Their Children
UN Announces Support for Obama's Nationalization of Police
After Dallas Cop Killings, UN Touts “Black Lives Matter”
After Garner Death, UN Fomenting Racial Strife in America
UN-backed Forces Slaughter Christians in Ivory Coast
UN Speaks Out Against School Textbooks in America
UN LGBT Czar on Indoctrinating Children: "The Younger the Better"
UN Human Rights Council: Is Washington "Redskins" Appropriate?
U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

PRAISE GOD!: SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR CUTS ALL FUNDING OF STATE ABORTION CLINICS

 https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/henry-mcmaster.jpg
 http://img.theepochtimes.com/n3/eet-content/uploads/2017/08/25/2017-08-25T203753Z_1_LYNXNPED7O1NR_RTROPTP_4_SOUTH-CAROLINA-ABORTION.jpg
 https://www.stripes.com/polopoly_fs/1.450901.1485423738!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_900/image.jpg
SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR CUTS ALL FUNDING 
OF STATE ABORTION CLINICS
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (shown) issued an executive order August 25 directing state agencies to cut off all funding to abortion clinics in the state. The order directs the agencies to cease providing both state and federal dollars via grants, contracts, state-administered federal funds, or “any other form,” to all clinics performing the murderous procedure.
Additionally, McMaster directed South Carolina's Department of Health and Human Services to seek waivers from the federal government allowing the state to exclude abortion clinics from its Medicaid provider network.
“There are a variety of agencies, clinics, and medical entities in South Carolina that receive taxpayer funding to offer important women's health and family planning services without performing abortions,” Gov. McMaster said in a statement. “Taxpayer dollars must not directly or indirectly subsidize abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.”

Charleston, South Carolina's Post and Courier newspaper reported that three clinics in the state “offer elective abortions in South Carolina, but only one of them is a Planned Parenthood clinic, in Columbia.” The newspaper added that “federal law already prohibits Medicaid money from being used to pay for abortions, with exceptions for cases of rape, incest or when the mother’s life is in danger.”
Planned Parenthood responded to the directive with postured outrage. “Today’s executive order issued by Governor McMaster hurts South Carolinians in the name of politics,” said Jenny Black, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, which administers the abortion giant's South Carolina franchise. “While he throws women under the bus to score political points, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic will continue to focus on providing the wide-range of accessible, affordable health care services that our patients, and his constituents, rely on. We will not stop fighting to protect our patients’ access to health care.”
Similarly, Ann Warner of Columbia, South Carolina's Women's Rights and Empowerment Network issued a statement declaring that “we cannot sit quietly and allow this to happen. We need to speak out. We need to look beyond political debates and remember that real people in our communities are going to get hurt if this executive order is allowed to stand.”
On the pro-life side, Marjorie Dannenfelser of the Susan B. Anthony List thanked Gov. McMaster “for acting to ensure taxpayers fund comprehensive primary and preventative care for women and families, not abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood.”
___________________________________________________
 Governor's order says funds won't go to 
abortion providers
 

"THEY DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH": FIVE YEAR OLD CHRISTIAN GIRL IN UK PLACED IN FOSTER CARE WITH NIQAB WEARING MUSLIMS~FORCED TO SPEAK ARABIC, OBSERVE MUSLIM DIET RESTRICTIONS, SHAMED ABOUT CHRISTIAN BELIEFS

"THEY DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH": FIVE YEAR OLD CHRISTIAN GIRL IN UK PLACED IN FOSTER CARE 
WITH NIQAB WEARING MUSLIMS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
“And more recently the girl told her that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and that ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’…the child was ‘very distressed’ and claimed the foster carer had removed her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic.”
Imagine what the outcry would be if a Muslim child were placed in a Christian family that denigrated her Muslim beliefs. And that would never happen in Britain or anywhere else in the West. But this incident is all in a day’s work in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain, in which the May government is so bent on appeasing Islamic supremacists and jihadis that it is willingly sacrificing non-Muslim children to the chimera of a harmonious multicultural future, a vision that will dissolve in blood.

“Christian girl, 5, is forced into foster care with Burka-wearing Muslim carers who ‘took away her crucifix and stopped her eating bacon,'” by Fiona Parker and Martin Robinson, Mailonline, August 28, 2017 (thanks to Blah):
A white five-year-old girl was forced to live in Muslim foster homes where nobody spoke English and her carers took away her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic, it emerged today.
The child, who is a native English speaker, spent the past six months in two Muslim households after being placed into foster care in Tower Hamlets, east London.
Local authority reports describe how the little girl sobbed and begged not to be returned to her niqab-wearing carer’s home, telling a social worker: ‘They don’t speak English.’
Her mother offered to send her back from a home visit with her favourite meal – spaghetti carbonara – but the girl said it was banned because it contained bacon – which Muslims do not eat.
And more recently the girl told her that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and that ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’, according to The Times.
The reports detail how the child was ‘very distressed’ and claimed the foster carer had removed her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic.
The two placements were made by the scandal-hit Tower Hamlets borough council against the wishes of the girl’s family.
Local authorities are required to give due consideration to a child’s religion, racial origin and cultural and linguistic background’ when placing them into a foster home.
The girl’s mother is said to be horrified by the circumstances her daughter has been placed in.
A friend told the newspaper: ‘This is a five-year-old white girl. She was born in this country, speaks English as her first language, loves football, holds a British passport and was christened in a church.
‘She’s already suffered the huge trauma of being forcibly separated from her family. She needs surroundings in which she’ll feel secure. Instead, she’s trapped in a world where everything feels foreign and unfamiliar. That’s really scary for a young child.’
The girl lived with her first carer, who is believed to have worn a niqab outside the family home, for four months. Her current carer wears a burka, which covers her face entirely, when she is out in public with the child….
_______________________________________________________
 Christian Child Forced Into Muslim Foster Care
 Published on Aug 28, 2017
Christian children in the UK are now being forced into Muslim foster care homes under the guise of "diversity" with the true intent being destruction of the West and free society.
 MPs' anger as Christian girl is forced into Muslim foster care: Demands for inquiry over five-year old girl

Published on Aug 28, 2017
MPs' anger as Christian girl is forced into Muslim foster care: Demands for inquiry over five-year-old's plight.
MPs demanded an urgent review last night after it emerged a ‘distressed' Christian five-year-old had been forced to live with Muslim foster carers.
The Government was urged to examine the case, which has seen a scandal-hit council place the girl in two Muslim households in the past six months, against the wishes of her family.
Social workers said the child sobbed and begged not to be returned to one foster mother – who wore a face veil in public – as the household spoke no English.
She also claimed her foster carer had said she should learn Arabic and had taken away her Christian cross necklace, The Times reported.
The child – who is white, was born in Britain and has a UK passport – was allegedly not allowed to eat a spaghetti carbonara prepared by her birth mother because it contained bacon.
She was said to have told her biological mother ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic' and ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid', prompting questions over cultural attitudes in her foster homes.
Her current foster mother wears a burka in public which completely hides her face. The placements were arranged by Tower Hamlets council in east London, where children's services were criticised by Ofsted earlier this year.
Inspectors rated the council's children's services ‘inadequate' and said there was an ‘entrenched culture of non-compliance with basic social work standards'.
Last night, MPs said the five-year-old's apparent distress over her foster homes raised disturbing questions over the council's decision to place an English-speaking Christian child in Muslim households.
Robert Halfon, chairman of the Commons education committee, urged the Government to examine the case and establish whether the issue was widespread within the foster care system.
He said the child should ‘have the right to be placed with people who reflect her heritage and background'.
Philip Hollobone, Tory MP for Kettering, said: ‘What if it were a Muslim girl being looked after by a Christian couple and they insisted she deny her Muslim upbringing and become a Christian – how would the Muslim community feel about that?
‘It seems to me the original heritage of the child ought to be respected by the foster family, whatever their own faith happens to be. The council needs to review this case urgently … All religions should be treated equally and respected in the same way.'
Andrew Bridgen, Tory MP for North West Leicestershire, added: ‘This just feels wrong. This is the wrong decision for the long-term welfare of the child.
‘My constituents will wonder what world they are living in, in Tower Hamlets … Someone needs to take a look at this. Imagine the outcry from the Muslim community if this had been a Muslim child adopted by a white Christian family.'
Former justice minister Shailesh Vara, Tory MP for North West Cambridgeshire, said the decision was ‘completely wrong', adding: ‘The local authority should have ensured that in placing the child in a foster home her religion and cultural background would be totally respected.
Tower Hamlets council was criticised only months ago by inspectors who found children were left in ‘situations of harm' for too long.
Its children's services department was branded ‘inadequate' by Ofsted in April. In their report, inspectors warned there were ‘widespread and serious failures' which had left children in ‘neglectful and abusive situations' for too long.
They said chief executive Will Tuckley and the department director Debbie Jones had ‘insufficient scrutiny', meaning they ‘did not know about the extent of the failures to protect children'. The watchdog's findings were so concerning that following its investigation in January, immediate action was needed in many cases to ensure children were safe.
Inspectors were also forced to order an urgent review into a number of areas, including private fostering arrangements.
They found superficial assessments failed to consider whether children had been trafficked or abandoned, and basic safeguard
 
Christian 5 Year-Old Girl Forced into Muslim Foster Care Has Cross Removed, Told to Learn Arabic 

Published on Aug 29, 2017
The child, who is a native English speaker, spent the past six months in two Muslim households after being placed into foster care in Tower Hamlets, east London. She was forced to live in Muslim foster homes where nobody spoke English and her carers took away her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic, according to The Times. Local authority reports describe how the little girl sobbed and begged not to be returned to her niqab-wearing carer’s home, telling a social worker: ‘They don’t speak English.’ The reports detail how the child was ‘very distressed’ and claimed the foster carer had removed her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic. The girl told her mother Christmas and Easter are 'stupid' and European women are alcoholics. The child, who is a native English speaker, also refused to take back her favourite meal - spaghetti carbonara - because it contained bacon - which Muslims do not eat. The girl’s mother is said to be horrified by the circumstances her daughter has been placed in. A friend told the newspaper: ‘This is a five-year-old girl. She was born in this country, speaks English as her first language, loves football, holds a British passport and was christened in a church. ‘She’s already suffered the huge trauma of being forcibly separated from her family. She needs surroundings in which she’ll feel secure. Instead, she’s trapped in a world where everything feels foreign and unfamiliar. That’s really scary for a young child.’