Translate

Friday, December 9, 2016

POPE (POOPUS) FRANCIS DISCUSSES PERVERSION OF EATING EXCREMENT AS A PARALLEL TO FOLLOWING "FAKE NEWS" FROM ALTERNATIVE MEDIA

 YES!: POPE (POOPUS) FRANCIS DISCUSSES PERVERSION OF EATING EXCREMENT AS A PARALLEL TO FOLLOWING "FAKE NEWS" FROM ALTERNATIVE MEDIA
WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM A SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST-GLOBALIST? 
ANSWER: HATRED OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
SEE:  

‘Pope’ Prays in Observance of Catholic Belief Mary Was Conceived Sinless: 

‘You Free Us From Stain of Sin’ 

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/12/09/pope-francis-prays-in-observance-of-catholic-belief-mary-conceived-sinless-you-free-us-from-stain-of-sin/;

EXCERPTS: 

“Not only is Mary’s immaculate conception and her sinlessness not revealed in God’s inspired, infallible Word, it goes directly against the teaching of Scripture,” Mike Gendron of Proclaiming the Gospel Ministries told Christian News Network. “The Bible clearly states that the sin of Adam was spread to all his descendants, including Mary.”
He pointed to Romans 5:12, which reads, “[A]s by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned,” as well as Romans 3:10 and 23, which teach that “there is none righteous, no, not one,” and that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”
Gendron also noted that Mary acknowledged her need of the Savior from sin when she said in Luke 1:47, “My spirit rejoices in God, my Savior.”
He said that not only is the doctrine of immaculate conception unbiblical, but Bergoglio’s assertion that Mary “frees us from the stain of sin” is an affront to the gospel.
“He profanely attributed to Mary what Christ alone had accomplished on Calvary’s cross,” Gendron said. “The pope’s prayer robbed Christ of His glorious accomplishment of purifying for Himself a people for His own possession (Titus 2:14). It was Jesus who ‘made purification of sins’ and ‘sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high’ indicating His redemptive work was finished (Heb. 1:3).”
“The pope needs to stop exalting Mary as a sinless mediator and give all glory honor and praise to Jesus because it was His precious blood that purifies His people from ALL sin (1 John 1:7),” he stated.
_______________________________________________________

PLEASE READ THIS BOOK FOR A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: 
"A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST"
BY DAVE HUNT 
 https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IY7Rp94Z5xE/hqdefault.jpg
 http://www.nowtheendbegins.com//wp-content/uploads/dave-hunt-woman-rides-the-beast-catholic-church-vatican.jpg
 

POPE FRANCIS PONTIFICATES ON "FAKE NEWS", CALLS IT A SIN & LIKENS IT TO "SEXUAL AROUSAL FROM EXCREMENT"

 http://quotes.lifehack.org/media/quotes/quote-Pope-Francis-I-sometimes-negative-news-does-come-out-but-160016.png
 http://www.relatably.com/q/img/pope-francis-quotes/150209155614-07-pope-quote-redo-0209-super-169.jpg
 
 
 POPE FRANCIS PONTIFICATES ON "FAKE NEWS", CALLS IT A SIN & LIKENS IT TO "SEXUAL AROUSAL FROM EXCREMENT" 
 The Pope also says that people who consume fake news are sick and tend toward coprophagia… eating poop
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
BREAKING: Real fake news list released! http://www.infowars.com/the-ultimate-fake-news-list/
In a recent interview with Tertio, the Pope weighed in on the so-called “fake news” scandal by calling disinformation a sin and saying that the media should not fall victim to “coprophilia” — that’s right, being aroused by poop.
A thing that can do great damage to the information media is disinformation: that is, faced with any situation, saying only a part of the truth, and not the rest. This is disinformation. Because you, to the listener or the observer, give only half the truth, and therefore it is not possible to make a serious judgement. Disinformation is probably the greatest damage that the media can do, as opinion is guided in one direction, neglecting the other part of the truth.
See, all of that is true… but he’s not specifying where this disinformation is coming from, leading the whole of the mainstream media to use the Pope’s statements to point fingers at the alternative media.
The Pope continued:
And then, I believe that the media should be very clear, very transparent, and not fall prey – without offense, please – to the sickness of coprophilia, which is always wanting to communicate scandal, to communicate ugly things, even though they may be true. And since people have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, it can do great harm. Thus, I would say that there are these four temptations. But they are builders of opinion and can construct, and do immense good, immense.
That’s right, the Pope also says that people who consume fake news are sick and tend toward coprophagia… eating poop.
He’s not talking about governments who spend billions on war propaganda or the mainstream media who parrots and tows the establishment line, even when its a blatant lie…
He’s getting on board with the same censorship agenda as the rest of the system… in a really sick way.
POPE DEFECATES ON "FAKE NEWS":

FACEBOOK ALREADY BLOCKING LINKS TO "FAKE NEWS"~U.S. GOVERNMENT BLAMES RUSSIANS & ALTERNATIVE MEDIA FOR CREATING "FAKE NEWS"

 Facebook Already Blocking Links to "Fake News"
FACEBOOK ALREADY BLOCKING LINKS 
TO "FAKE NEWS" 
 Despite Washington Post admitting its "fake news" exposé was based on shoddy research
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Facebook is already blocking links to so-called “fake news” stories, despite the Washington Post being forced to admit that its own definitive article on “fake news” was based on shoddy research.
A Twitter user revealed how he tried to post an Alex Jones Channel video about ‘PizzaGate’ on Facebook but was blocked from doing so because Facebook characterized the YouTube link as “unsafe”.
This suggests that more than just blocking alleged “fake news” websites, Facebook is censoring certain topics from being posted altogether.
The social network giant also appears keen to comply with a European Union demand that all “fake news,” which was listed on a par with hate speech and jihadist propaganda, be censored within 24 hours.
As we reported yesterday, after pressure from academics, Google is also de-listing information pertaining to criticism of Islam and information about black people being over-represented in crime figures (which is an objective fact).
The notion of social media websites blocking content they arbitrarily decide to be “fake news” is chilling, especially given that the Washington Post has now been forced to admit that its vaunted “fake news” exposé was itself fake after massive blow back.
“A lengthy editor’s note appeared on top of the original article in which the editor not only distances the WaPo from the “experts” quoted in the original article whose “work” served as the basis for the entire article (and which became the most read WaPo story the day it was published) but also admits the Post could not “vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s finding regarding any individual media outlet”, in effect admitting the entire story may have been, drumroll “fake news” and conceding the Bezos-owned publication may have engaged in defamation by smearing numerous websites – Zero Hedge included – with patently false and unsubstantiated allegations,” reports Zero Hedge.
Given that the first list of “fake news” websites was also completely debunked as the bias-driven musings of a far-left social justice warrior, what credibility does the mainstream media have left in lecturing everyone else as to what constitutes “fake news”?
Get the REAL list of fake news websites right here.
_______________________________________________________

Breaking! Federal Govt. Says Fake News is Espionage; Russians & Alternative Media Being Blamed

Published on Dec 8, 2016

Congress just passed a bill called the Intelligence Authorization Act to combat what US intelligence sources are calling fake news and covert broadcasting by the Russian government and alternative media websites within the U.S.
 
 
 

NEW TSA AIRPORT SCREENERS TRAINED BY MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUP

Muslim Brotherhood Front Group 
Trains Airport Screeners
BY CHERYL CHUMLEY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
An estimated 2,200 new Transportation Security Officers sent to work at the Los Angeles International Airport received their on-the-job training from officials with the Muslim Public Affairs Council, a group that’s tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical organization with terror ties and global Sharia intent.
Human Events reported the training, citing a press release on the MPAC’s own website:
“The MPAC release notes that the two-month training course informed officers of ‘the diversity of Muslims around the world from cultural dress to language to tenets. The four trainers taught the TSOs how to properly handle a Quran and discussed the different ways Muslim women and men choose to cover or dress. For example, the TSOs learned if a woman wears hijab and needs a secondary screening she should be screened in a private area by a female TSO officer.'”
Isn’t that a bit like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse?
Airport security screeners at Los Angeles were trained by officials with a group that's tied to the radical Muslim Brotherhood.
Airport security screeners at Los Angeles were trained by officials with a group that’s tied to the radical Muslim Brotherhood.
MPAC was created in 1986 as a political mouthpiece for the Islamic Center for Southern California, one of America’s largest Wahhabi mosques.
Human Events fills in the details:
“As the Center for Security Policy’s Team B II report entitled ‘Sharia: The Threat to America’ notes, ‘The founders of the Islamic Center for Southern California are Hassan Hathout and his brother Maher Hathout. The late Hassan Hathout was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement. The two brothers Maher spent time in an Egyptian prison during the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities there, led by the Brotherhood’s founder Hassan Al Banna. MPAC’s own publication, The Minaret, has proudly called Hassan a ‘companion of’ and Maher ‘a close disciple of’ Brotherhood founder Hassan al Banna.’
“Maher Hathout also founded and is currently a senior advisor for MPAC. He and others at MPAC also currently work for and maintain a close relationship with the Islamic Center of Southern California.
“Hathout was also on the board of directors and a member of the American Muslim Council (AMC) from 1993 to 1997. AMC was founded by the al Qaeda financier and Hamas operative Abdurahman Alamoudi who is currently serving 23 years in prison for funding terrorist groups including al Qaeda.
“Maher Hathout served on the AMC Board of Directors at the same time Alamoudi was serving as its Executive Director.
“‘Maher Hathout has publicly voiced his approval of Designated Terrorist Organizations such as Hezbollah; decried many U.S. counterterrorism efforts; called for the destruction of Israel; and, openly supported known terrorists such as Hasan al Turabi, the leader of the National Islamic Front of Sudan. Yet, the organization he founded, MPAC, enjoys a reputation in official U.S. circles as a ‘moderate’ Muslim organization,’ the Team B II report states.”
There are more important links and ties. But the gist is this, again from Human Events:

“MPAC works as a propaganda and misinformation ministry for the Muslim Brotherhood. One example offered in the Team B II Report is its aggressive and successful pursuit of total control of the language used by the United States government in regard to Muslim terrorists.”
It was MPAC that took umbrage at the language in the 9/11 Commission Report used to describe the terror events as they unfolded. It was MPAC that demanded America stop using words like jihad, caliphate, sharia and ummah to describe terrorism and terror groups’ goals. And MPAC was successful in his quest for censorship of truth.
As Human Events notes, citing the same report:
“‘In subsequent years, the National Counterterrorism Center, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have all issued strategic counterterrorism documents devoid of these terms. Such conformity to shariah by U.S. government entities such as the FBI and DHS is an extraordinary strategic victory for the enemy in the information battlespace.'”
And if you want to know more about the ties between MPAC and terror groups, here’s a full report: “Beyond the Facade: The Muslim Public Affairs Council.”

ROBERT SPENCER ON THE JIHAD AGAINST THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH~MUSLIM CLERIC GIVES OK TO DRESS AS PRIESTS OR RABBIS TO WAGE JIHAD MASSACRES

ROBERT SPENCER ON THE JIHAD 
AGAINST THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH 
 
Published on Dec 8, 2016
On November 12, 2016, Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer spoke at the David Horowitz Freedom Center's Restoration Weekend at The Breakers in West Palm Beach, Florida, on the ongoing Islamic efforts to compel the U.S. and the West to curtail the freedom of speech.

Muslim cleric: Muslims may dress as priests or rabbis to carry out jihad massacres

Muslim cleric: Muslims may dress as priests or rabbis to carry out jihad massacres

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/12/muslim-cleric-muslims-may-dress-as-priests-or-rabbis-to-carry-out-jihad-massacres; 


 

SHERIFF ARPAIO TO DROP BOMB SHELL DECEMBER 15 ABOUT OBAMA & HIS MOTHER

Shocking Nude Photos Of Obama's Mom? Sheriff Arpaio to Reveal More About Obama, His Birth Certificate & His Mother's Sordid History

 Published on Dec 9, 2016

Writer, Director Joel Gilbert exposes the hidden past of Barack Obama and his communist ties to his REAL father, Frank Marshall Davis.

JUDGE ON TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT LIST ISSUES RULING FAVORABLE OF ALLOWING "GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE" AT MIDDLE SCHOOL

 
JUDGE ON TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT LIST ISSUES RULING FAVORABLE OF ALLOWING "GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE" AT MIDDLE SCHOOL 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 An appeals court judge who is on President-elect Donald Trump’s list 
of potential nominees for the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a ruling on 
Tuesday that reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a complaint 
surrounding the denial of a “gay-straight alliance” club at a Florida 
middle school.
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge William Pryor, who also prosecuted Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore in 2003 over his refusal to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court, wrote the opinion on behalf of his colleagues.
“[T]he complaint that the Board violated the Act is ripe because the Board made a final decision when it rejected the application of the Alliance to form a club,” he wrote. “[T]he complaint also is not moot because the district court can still fashion relief for a violation of the Act. … [T]he Act applies to Carver because it provides courses for high school credit and, under Florida law, these courses constitute ‘secondary education.'”
The matter began in 2011 when Carver Middle School student Bayli Silberstein sought permission to form an alliance, but was denied. In 2013, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed suit on behalf of student Hannah Faughnan, who took on the effort after Silberstein moved on to high school.

The Lake County School Board had issued new rules about student clubs that year, which limited permitted groups to “organizations that strengthen and promote critical thinking, business skills, athletic skills, and performing/visual arts.” It declined the request for the alliance because it was unrelated to the school curriculum and did not fall under any of the required categories, but allowed Faughan the opportunity to prove otherwise.
The ACLU asserted that the board’s actions and the new rules violated the federal Equal Access Act, but last year, U.S. District Judge William Terrell Hodges dismissed the case, stating that the law only applies to secondary schools. He also noted that Faughan did not resubmit the application when provided the chance.
On Tuesday, Pryor and his colleagues overturned Hodges’ ruling, stating that as Carver Middle School offers courses good for high school credit, the school would apply under the Equal Access Act. It remanded the case back to the lower court to rule accordingly.

“Because the term in the Equal Access Act that matters is ‘secondary education,’ not ‘secondary school,’ we need not delve into this tangle of provisions,” Pryor wrote on behalf of the panel. “We conclude that ‘secondary education,’ under Florida law, means at least ‘courses through which a person receives high school credit that leads to the award of a high school diploma.'”
“Carver Middle School provides courses through which students can obtain high school credit. The Equal Access Act applies to Carver Middle School,” he continued. “We vacate the order that dismissed the complaint under the Equal Access Act and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
As previously reported, Pryor had grilled Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore in 2003 as he stood trial for refusing to remove the Ten Commandments from the rotunda of the state Supreme Court. His comments to Moore focused more on Moore’s refusal to stop acknowledging God in his official capacity.
“[Y]our understanding is that the federal court ordered that you could not acknowledge God; isn’t that right?” Pryor asked. “And if you resume your duties as chief justice after this proceeding, you will continue to acknowledge God as you have testified that you would today?”
“That’s right,” Moore replied.
“No matter what any other official says?” Pryor asked.
“Absolutely,” Moore stated. “Let me clarify that. Without an acknowledgment of God, I cannot do my duties. I must acknowledge God. It says so in the Constitution of Alabama. It says so in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It says so in everything I have read.”
“The only point I am trying to clarify, Mr. Chief Justice, is not why, but only that, in fact, if you do resume your duties as chief justice, you will continue to do that without regard to what any other official says; isn’t that right?” Pryor asked.
As Moore continued to stand his ground, he was ordered by Pryor to be “removed from his position of Supreme Court justice of Alabama.”
Pryor is among those included on Trump’s list of possible Supreme Court picks, along with Steven Colloton, Allison Eid, Thomas Lee, Diane Sykes, Don Willett, and others.
 

OBAMA DEFENDS ISLAM, BLAMES AMERICA FOR FUELING "TERRORIST NARRATIVE"

OBAMA DEFENDS ISLAM, BLAMES AMERICA FOR FUELING "TERRORIST NARRATIVE" 
BY CHERYL CHUMLEY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
President Obama tipped his delusionary hat during a speech in Tampa, Florida, this week, telling the assembled crowd that Islam ought not to be slandered as a religion that fosters terrorism, and in fact, it’s America’s failures to recognize “good patriotic Muslims” that’s fueling violence.
Some in the saner world of thinking might say tying the two together is calling a spade a spade, as based on historical evidence.
It'd be nice if President Obama would stop blaming America for fueling terrorism and finally admit, before he leaves office, that Islam actually promotes such violence.
It’d be nice if President Obama would stop blaming America for fueling terrorism and finally admit, before he leaves office, that Islam actually promotes such violence.
But not Obama.
As Breitbart reported:
“Obama said, ‘We are fighting terrorists who claim to fight on behalf of Islam. but they do not speak for over a billion Muslims around the world. And they do not speak for American Muslims, including many who wear the uniform of the United States of America’s military. If we stigmatize good patriotic Muslims, that just feeds the terrorist narrative. It fuels the same false grievances that they use to motivate people to kill.'”
Can this man leave office soon enough?
He wasn’t done with his admonitions yet. Again, Breitbart:
 “‘If we act like this is a war between the United States and Islam, we’re not just going to lose more Americans to terrorist attacks, but we’ll also lose sight of the very principles we claim to defend,’ he continued. ‘So let me final words to you as your commander in chief, be a reminder of what it is you’re fighting for, what it is that we are fighting for. The United States of America is not a country that imposes religious tests as a price for freedom. We’re a country that was founded so that people could practice their faiths as they choose. The United States of America is not a place where some citizens have to withstand greater scrutiny or carry a special ID card or prove that they’re not an enemy from within.'”

ALEX JONES: WITH DARKNESS COMES DEATH, A PLEA FOR FREE SPEECH

ALEX JONES: WITH DARKNESS COMES DEATH, 
A PLEA FOR FREE SPEECH 
 
Published on Dec 9, 2016
What happens when they take away free speech? History knows, will we have to learn that impossibly difficult lesson again?

TRUMP PICKS OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL SCOTT PRUITT TO LEAD THE EPA~DEMOCRATS INCENSED~HOORAH!

 http://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Scott-Pruitt.jpg

Trump Picks Okla. Attorney General to Lead EPA: Big Win for Climate Realists, Constitutionalists 

BY STEVE BYAS

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24804-trump-picks-okla-attorney-general-to-lead-epa-big-win-for-climate-realists-constitutionanists; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
“We’re certainly going to draw a line in the sand. This is the worst-case scenario when it comes to clean air and clean water, to nominate a climate denier to the agency charged with protecting our natural resources,” groused Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), expressing his opposition to President-elect Donald Trump's nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as director of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
For conservatives, however, it was a home run. Pruitt has fought President Barack Obama in court on a host of issues, including Obama’s executive orders on ObamaCare, immigration, and even bathroom use by transgenders, in addition to his lawsuit against the very agency he is now slated to head.
Pruitt was a leader in state litigation against Obama’s climate rule for power plants, and has also challenged the president's water regulations and standards for ground-level ozone pollution, haze, and methane. Trump intends to repeal the Clean Water Rule and generally roll back rules on fossil fuel production, stating that he will place a moratorium on new regulations by requiring two rules be repealed for every new rule created by the EPA.

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a member of the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, was likewise incensed at the nomination of Pruitt, promising to “vigorously” oppose it. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) also warned he would "fight” against Pruitt, declaring, “I think he has a record and it will be scrutinized, and there will be opposition there as a result.”
It is that very record that should reassure conservatives who were concerned when Trump met with former Vice President Al Gore, perhaps the most visible advocate of stringent laws to stop “climate change,” which Gore claims is caused by human economic activity. It also is a setback to Trump’s daughter Ivanka, who essentially agrees with Gore on the issue.
Obama had ordered a 32-percent cut in the emission of carbon dioxide emissions by the fossil fuel industries (such as oil and gas and coal) by 2030. Trump called the harsh regulation a “war on coal.” It is thought that Obama’s draconian rule, which Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton fully supported, contributed to Trump’s surprising win in Pennsylvania.
Pruitt said the plan would have shut down numerous coal-fired power plants in Oklahoma and raised the price of electricity for consumers. “This is an effort that I think is extraordinary in cost, extraordinary in scope, and I think extraordinary as it relates to the intrusion into the sovereignty of the states,” Pruitt charged recently, in commenting about the rule of Obama’s EPA, which he contends "coerces" states to reorganize their electricity systems and “commandeer” state resources to do that.
He states that the rule is clearly unconstitutional. “It’s an invasion … of the state regulatory domain, and it’s something that is unique and breathtaking as it relates to the kind of rulemaking the EPA has engaged in historically.” Pruitt led fellow Republican attorneys general in getting the Supreme Court to put a hold on the rule earlier this year.
Another battle taken on by Pruitt was a legal fight against the Clean Water Rule of the EPA, sometimes called the Waters of the United States. It claimed that small waterways such as wetlands and streams are under federal, not state, jurisdiction. To that claim, Pruitt retorted, “This regulation usurps the state’s authority over its land and water use, and triggers numerous and costly obligations under the [Clean Water] Act for the state and its citizens.” He convinced a federal court to block its implementation, as well.
Pruitt is also skeptical of the assertions of Gore and others like him on the issue of “climate change.” Writing in the Tulsa World in May, Pruitt said the debate on global warming “is far from settled” and that “scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind.”
Scott Pruitt was elected attorney general of Oklahoma in 2010 as a close ally of Oklahoma’s conservative Senator Jim Inhofe. Inhofe is the outgoing chairman of the Senate’s Environmental and Public Works Committee, and has written a book, The Greatest Hoax, in opposition to so-called human-caused climate change. Before his election as attorney general, Pruitt was part-owner and general manager of the Oklahoma Redhawks baseball team, and had served in the Oklahoma State Senate, where he was named a Top Conservative Legislator by the Oklahoma Constitution newspaper.
As attorney general, Pruitt has taken on several causes in support of limited government and the sovereignty of the states. He filed suit in federal court in an effort to combat ObamaCare (the Affordable Care Act). He won in federal court, arguing that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) did “not have the authority to expand access to subsidies (or levy penalties) beyond what is clearly written in the law. These issues are of great importance to the State of Oklahoma because we value our state’s economic stability and growth, and the rule of law.”
Pruitt was challenging the decision of Obama’s IRS to force Oklahoma citizens (and those of 33 other states) to be part of ObamaCare, despite the choice of those states to not set up healthcare exchanges. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court eventually ruled that, even though the 2010 law said the subsidies would come through state exchanges (or if the state chose, federal exchanges), that it did not matter. Commentator Dick Morris agreed with Pruitt’s position, explaining that the law had said tax credits could be given only if a plan was enrolled in through the exchange established by the state under Section 1311 of the Affordable Care Act.
Had the Supreme Court sided with Pruitt, it would have crippled the ObamaCare law in Oklahoma and 33 other states.
On the state level, Pruitt told an interviewer with the libertarian think tank CATO that he does not agree with civil asset forfeiture, unless it is “post-conviction.”
In the podcast with CATO, Pruitt said he had no trouble with seizing property of drug dealers used in the drug trade, but that a person should have to be convicted before permanent asset forfeiture could take place. “The system we have in Oklahoma is wrong and flawed,” he declared.
He cited the following case, which he called an “egregious” example of abuse of civil asset forfeiture in Oklahoma. A Kansas resident was traveling in Oklahoma with a contemporary Christian band, having raised a large amount of charity money to send to Burma, when he was stopped by a sheriff’s office in Muskogee County for a broken taillight. Since the man was carrying $53,000 in cash, the sheriff’s office just presumed it was drug money and confiscated it. They called in a drug dog, who alerted that drugs were in the vehicle, though no drugs were ever found. Pruitt told CATO that the use of drug dogs “can be manipulated.”
Pruitt has even stood up to fellow Republicans in Oklahoma when he believes they are not following the law. For example, when a state school superintendent hired three high-level staffers at the Department of Education without approval from the State Board of Education (as required by law), using private funds, Pruitt issued an opinion against the action, even though the superintendent was a fellow Republican. In Oklahoma, attorneys general may issue “opinions” on the legality of actions by state officials that are held as a lawful interpretation unless overturned by a court
“A person cannot perform official duties of a state agency with compensation paid directly to them by a private person or entity,” Pruitt asserted. “Only employees and offices of the state who are authorized by law to do so may perform the official duties of the state, and those who are authorized may only be compensated as authorized by law.”
With this pick of Pruitt, Trump gives hope that the presidential election indeed made a difference — a positive difference.
_______________________________________________________

Huge Win: Trump's New EPA Head is Anti Carbon Tax / Pro America

 

OPENLY GAY CONNECTICUT STATE COMPTROLLER THREATENS CHRISTIAN GROUP OVER OPPOSITION TO GAY AGENDA~DIDN'T EXPECT THE BACKLASH

 http://wnpr.org/sites/wnpr/files/styles/x_large/public/201307/kevin_20lembo.jpg
 Connecticut State Comptroller Kevin Lembo (D), shown, the first openly gay man elected to statewide office in the Nutmeg State, is “married” to Charles Frey; the two men have adopted and reared three children.
 http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_N1yUAaYYJ_c/S_khvXeW7xI/AAAAAAAAAVs/E9l55DVA0aU/s1600/KevinLembo.jpg
http://www.trbimg.com/img-57103713/turbine/charlesfreykevinlemboltorididnttakethis-jpg-20160414/750/750x422
OPENLY GAY CONNECTICUT STATE OFFICIAL THREATENS CHRISTIAN GROUP OVER OPPOSITION 
TO GAY AGENDA
BY MICHAEL TENNANT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
An openly homosexual elected official in Connecticut is threatening to strip the American Family Association (AFA) of its status as a charity to which state employees may donate via payroll deduction because he considers the group’s traditional Christian positions discriminatory.
Connecticut State Comptroller Kevin Lembo (D), shown, the first openly gay man elected to statewide office in the Nutmeg State, is “married” to Charles Frey; the two men have adopted and reared three children. Naturally, Lembo is not particularly fond of the AFA’s opposition to the homosexual agenda and its defense of traditional marriage. On November 30, he sent a two-page letter to AFA president Tim Wildmon announcing that he was “initiating an investigation to determine whether AFA is in compliance with the requirements of the” Connecticut State Employee Campaign for Charitable Giving (CSEC), a program that allows state employees to contribute to nonprofit charities via payroll deduction.
According to OneNewsNow, the AFA’s news division, the AFA “applied for qualified charity status through a group called Neighbor to Nation, which confirmed to OneNewsNow that the pro-family group meets every standard that Connecticut demands of its charities.” Indeed, the charity has long participated in CSEC, though not with particularly impressive results: OneNewsNow reports that the group received a total of $124 from Connecticut employees between 2000 and 2015.

That minuscule amount, however, is apparently too much for Lembo, who cannot stomach the thought that even $7.75 a year of state employees’ own earnings should go to an organization such as the AFA. In his letter, he suggested that the group “may be in violation of the regulations governing the [CSEC] that broadly prohibit discrimination,” as well as other state and federal nondiscrimination laws.
“What’s being foisted upon the American Family Association is the latest iteration of ‘If you don’t adhere to the nouveaux orthodoxy of the day — which is the sexual deviancy agenda — then you must be castigated and expelled from public life,’” AFA general counsel Abraham Hamilton III told OneNewsNow.
While Lembo demanded the presumed-guilty AFA prove itself innocent by providing reams of documentation, “the letter never cites any state or federal laws of which AFA might be in violation,” Wildmon observed. Instead, Lembo merely described various AFA policies of which he disapproves and asserted that such policies “may be violating these anti-discrimination prohibitions.”
Lembo derisively referred to the AFA’s “so-called attempts to protect family values [that] involve ‘combatting the homosexual agenda’ by boycotting companies that promote equal treatment, tolerance and acceptance of all families and marriages.” He specifically pointed to the group’s “nationwide petition to boycott Target for the company’s inclusive transgender restroom policy and denouncing Zales for ‘normalizing sin’ by advertising wedding bands to same-sex couples.”
Of course, as the AFA’s Bryan Fischer pointed out, “Target has made it company policy to allow men who may be sexual predators or video voyeurs to wander unchallenged into female dressing rooms, where they may film or molest our wives, our daughters, and our granddaughters. In Lembo’s utterly twisted view of the world, the bigots are those who want to protect the sexual integrity of females.”
Lembo also cited the AFA’s opposition to “gay and Muslim individuals serving in the U.S. military” and the fact that the group “has equated homosexuality with pedophilia, disease and violence.”
The comptroller didn’t counter these positions with facts but with feelings. “These actions and statements,” he wrote, “are extremely troubling to me — not only as an openly gay father and spouse — but as administrator of the CSEC.” The AFA’s opinions, he added, “appear to discriminate against the LGBTQ communities” and Muslims, and “it remains unclear what actual charitable services the AFA provides.”
One waits with bated breath for Lembo to voice similar concerns about such “charities” as Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Federation, the National Council of La Raza, and the Hartford Gay and Lesbian Health Collective, all of which also qualify for CSEC, according to the program’s website. Such organizations “discriminate” against people of opposing viewpoints much as the AFA does. But unlike the AFA, some of these “charities” also kill (unborn) people.
The AFA charges that Lembo is engaging in unconstitutional discrimination against them and any state employees who wish to contribute to them. Besides the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of “free exercise” of religion, the Connecticut constitution states that “the exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall forever be free to all persons,” although this provision “shall not be construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state.”
Fischer argues:
AFA’s views do not “excuse acts of licentiousness,” but quite the reverse. Our views urge moral self-restraint, adherence to the moral standards of the Ten Commandments, and the channeling of sexual energy into marriage, which according to God’s design consists of the union of one man and one woman. This is a recipe that is not “inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state” but instead produces it….
While accusing AFA of discrimination, Mr. Lembo is practicing it, exhibiting it, and displaying it. He is the one guilty of discrimination, and is a part of the reprehensible attempt on the part of secular fundamentalists to purge all traces of Christianity from the public square.
The AFA wants Lembo to retract his letter and issue a public apology for it. Whether he does or doesn’t, he certainly won’t forget his run-in with the group. He told the Connecticut Post Wednesday that AFA supporters had “swamped” his office switchboard and sent him over 10,000 e-mails. Not bad for a supposedly “fringe” organization.

BREAKING NEWS: CLIMATE SCARE IS OVER!

BREAKING NEWS: CLIMATE SCARE IS OVER! 
 
Published on Dec 8, 2016
Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver interviews Lord Christopher Monckton who reveals a breaking discovery which may prove the entire 'climate change' scare is based on faulty mathematics. At the "Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie" conference in Phoenix, AZ Lord Monckton covers in depth the mathematical discovery his team has made and announces that these findings have been submitted for proper peer review.

https://www.freedomforceinternational...