Friday, May 13, 2016


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

During an interview on Wednesday, the CEO of the national retail chain Target defended the company’s restroom and fitting room policy—allowing men who identify as women to use female facilities and vice versa—in the face of a national boycott and falling stock prices.
“We took a stance and we’re going to continue to embrace our belief of diversity and inclusion—just how important that is to our company,” Brian Cornell said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
He compared the backlash over the matter to the criticism the company received when it first used blacks for models in advertising.
“A couple weeks ago, one of our team members sent me a note reminding me that if we went back to the mid-60’s, our company was one of the very first to use African-American models in their advertising, and back then, it wasn’t well received,” Cornell said.
He noted, however, that the company plans to add more family restrooms in an effort to quell concerns over privacy and safety. Cornell said that approximately 1,400 of its 1,800 stores currently have that option.
“We’re committed over the next few months, to make sure every one of our stores has that option, because we want to make sure that our guests be welcomed in our stores,” Cornell said. “But if there’s a question of safety, I can tell you and others, our focus on safety is unwavering, and we want to make sure we provide a welcoming environment for all our guests, one that’s safe, one that’s comfortable.”
As previously reported, Target outlined its company policy last month surrounding controversy over “bathroom bills” passed in North Carolina and Mississippi.
“In our stores, we demonstrate our commitment to an inclusive experience in many ways. Most relevant for the conversations currently underway, we welcome transgender team members and guests to use the restroom or fitting room facility that corresponds with their gender identity,” the announcement said.
“We regularly assess issues and consider many factors such as impact to our business, guests and team members. Given the specific questions these legislative proposals raised about how we manage our fitting rooms and restrooms, we felt it was important to state our position,” it continued.
The announcement drew both applause and criticism, and some vowed to discontinue shopping at Target until it changed its policy.
“I will no longer be shopping at Target,” one former customer wrote. “It is your right as a business to establish policies, but … you will also have to deal with the consequences.”
The Mississippi-based American Family Association (AFA) soon also launched an official pledge campaign to boycott Target. The effort has thus far obtained 1.2 million signatures.
The organization said that it believes Target should provide a single occupancy restroom to help solve the issue.
“One solution is a common-sense approach and a reasonable solution to the issue of transgendered customers: a unisex bathroom. Target should keep separate facilities for men and women, but for the trans community and for those who simply like using the bathroom alone, a single occupancy unisex option should be provided,” AFA recommended.
“We want to make it very clear that AFA does not believe the transgender community poses this danger to the wider public,” President Tim Wildmon also clarified. “Rather, this misguided and reckless policy provides a possible gateway for predators who are out there.”
Stocks have also fallen in recent weeks following the company’s announcement, decreasing from $84 to $75.70 a share over the past month.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Education released on Friday guidelines for schools nationwide that outline that the Obama administration requires schools to allow students to use the restroom and locker room corresponding with their “gender identity” under threat of losing their federal funding.
“There is no room in our schools for discrimination of any kind, including discrimination against transgender students on the basis of their sex,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch in a statement announcing the release of the guidelines. “This guidance gives administrators, teachers, and parents the tools they need to protect transgender students from peer harassment and to identify and address unjust school policies.”
The eight-page document outlines that the government interprets Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 as applying to those who identify as transgender. The section, which prohibits educational institutions from discriminating against a person based on their gender, has generally been considered as applying to discrimination against women in treating females as inferior to males, including in sports programs.
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance,” Title IX reads.
The Justice and Education Departments consequently outlined in the document released on Friday that schools must allow males who identify as females and vice versa to use the restroom or locker room that corresponds with their gender identity, or as the the document defined it, their “internal sense of gender.”
“A school may provide separate facilities on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such facilities consistent with their gender identity,” it reads. “A school may not require transgender students to use facilities inconsistent with their gender identity or to use individual-user facilities when other students are not required to do so.”
“Under Title IX, there is no medical diagnosis or treatment requirement that students must meet as a prerequisite to being treated consistent with their gender identity,” the Obama administration further outlines, stating that students and/or their parents must simply “assert a gender identity that differs from previous representations or records” to administrators in order to be granted access to their preferred facility.
The rules also apply to housing and participation in sports programs, although competitive fairness may be taken into account in relation to the student’s admission into an athletics program.
The departments state that failure to follow these guidelines could result in the loss of federal funding.
“As a condition of receiving federal funds, a school agrees that it will not exclude, separate, deny benefits to, or otherwise treat differently on the basis of sex any person in its educational programs or activities unless expressly authorized to do so under Title IX or its implementing regulations,” the document warns.
However, as previously reported, earlier this month over 50 families sued the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Education for forcing a school district to allow a male student who identifies as female to use the girls’ locker room at his local high school.
“It’s a massive step backwards to force women to give up their inherent right to bodily privacy,” said Thomas More Society attorney Jocelyn Floyd in a statement. “To impose such a rule on still-developing teenage girls, as they’re already struggling with puberty’s changes on their bodies and social pressures to look a certain way, undermines their dignity and tells them that their rights don’t matter. This isn’t a message our schools should be sending to our girls.”

AntiChrist Spirited Obama tells schools to let transgender students use bathrooms of their choice




Former Mexican president: "Don't play around with us, we can jump walls"

SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In comments glossed over by the media, former Mexican President Vicente Fox warned that the election of Donald Trump could lead to a “war” between Mexico and the United States.
During an appearance on the Kickass Politics podcast, Fox accused Trump of ushering in a return to “the era of the ugly American.”
Media reports on Fox’s comments focused on his throwback use of the word “gringo,” to describe a time when Americans were “hated all around the world,” but the former Mexican leader made even more inflammatory remarks when he suggested that Donald Trump’s rhetoric could lead to a conflict between the U.S. and Mexico.
“He is the hated gringo because he’s attacking all of us, he’s offending all of us, I mean imagine – that could take us to a war – not to a trade war,” said Fox.
Adding that Mexicans were small but “like the jalapeno,” Fox warned, “Don’t play around with us. We can jump walls. We can swim rivers. And we can defend ourselves.”
Fox appears to be flip-flopping between being aggressive and conciliatory towards Trump. After angrily asserting that Mexico would not pay for Trump’s “f*cking wall” during an interview earlier this year, he subsequently apologized, reminding himself that leaders need to be “humble”.
Fox’s ludicrous assertion that Trump’s offensive rhetoric could lead to an armed conflict between the U.S. and Mexico suggests he isn’t following his own advice.
“Is this guy out of his freakin’ mind?” asks Brian Anderson. “He was the president of Mexico so presumably he is aware of the Mexican military’s severe limitations, especially in confronting the world’s only superpower.”


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

JACKSON, Miss. — The Republican governor of Mississippi has signed a bill cutting the abortion giant Planned Parenthood, as well as the state’s sole surgical abortion facility, from its Medicaid program.
“Happy to sign Senate Bill 2238. Taxpayer dollars should not fund abortions,” Tweeted Gov. Phil Bryant on Tuesday.
The bill had been sponsored by Sen. Joey Fillingane and only applies to facilities that perform non-therapeutic abortions. Therapeutic abortions are those performed due to fetal abnormalities or the life or health of the mother.
“[T]he division shall not authorize payment of part or all of the costs of care and services rendered by any entity that performs non-therapeutic abortions, maintains or operates a facility where non-therapeutic abortions are performed, or is affiliated with such an entity,” it reads in part.
“For purposes of this provision, ‘non-therapeutic abortions’ means abortions that are not qualified for federal matching funds under the Medicaid program,” the bill clarifies.
As previously reported, the sole Planned Parenthood location in Mississippi only provides referrals for abortions, but lawmakers believe that the state should not be affiliated with the organization. The Hattiesburg location had been receiving occasional reimbursement for birth control.
“You are the company you keep, and by Mississippi reimbursing Planned Parenthood through Medicaid, we are keeping that company,” Senate Medicaid Committee Chairman Brice Wiggins, R-Pascagoula, told reporters.
Fillingane outlined that Planned Parenthood refers mothers to the Jackson abortion facility and others out of state, and so he believes it is all the same in aiding an organization that helps women obtain abortions. He said that there are a number of entities in the state that provide women’s health services that aren’t involved with abortion.
“There are many other non-Planned Parenthood clinics and agencies that can provide these other services that the critics want to talk about,” Fillingane said.
“So it’s not as though you’re denying any services to, you know, poor women or women that can’t afford these treatments. They can go to the local health departments and get the same type of service that they can get at this clinic,” he continued. “The only difference is The Mississippi Department of Health and the health clinics are not also providing abortions, and so the monies that we send to those agencies do not also subsidize abortions in the state or in this country.”
Diane Derzis, a professing Christian who operates Jackson Women’s Health Organization—the last remaining surgical abortion facility in Mississippi—told liberal radio host Alan Colmes last October that even she hoped Planned Parenthood would be defunded.
“I agree that Planned Parenthood should be defunded. Absolutely,” she said. “They actually do more abortions than anyone in the country, even though they talk about doing only three percent, that’s not quite accurate—they do more than anyone in the country. And they are the Walmart of abortion. I’m not a Planned Parenthood defender here.”
Planned Parenthood is stated to perform approximately 40 percent of all abortions in America. In its annual report released at the end of December, the national office of Planned Parenthood outlined that the organization performed 323,999 abortions nationwide during the 2014-2015 fiscal year.
The bill stripping the organization of Medicaid reimbursement passed the Mississippi House 77 to 7 and the Senate 34 to 17. The law will now take effect on July 1.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

PINEDALE, Wy. — A judicial commission in Wyoming is calling for the removal of a municipal and circuit court judge after she told the media in 2014 that she would not be able to officiate same-sex unions due to her faith.
According to reports, Ruth Neely told a reporter for the Sublette Examiner in 2014 after a federal judge struck down the state’s ban on same-sex “marriage” that she personally could not take part in the officiation.
“I will not able to do them,” Neely stated. “We have at least one magistrate who will do same-sex marriages, but I will not be able to. … When law and religion conflict, choices have to be made.”
She made clear that her personal inability would not stop homosexuals from finding a local judge to officiate.
In January of last year, following a complaint from Democratic Party Chairwoman Ana Cuprill, the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics launched an investigation into Neely’s remarks.
It soon issued her a notice of that disciplinary proceedings would commence. Neely was accused of violating six rules of judicial conduct, including that she “manifested a bias” by her statement and therefore possessed prejudice in regard to so-called sexual orientation.
Neely, who has served as judge for over 20 years, has never been asked to officiate a same-sex ceremony. According to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, judges in Pinedale are not required to handle nuptials, but can if they desire.
“As the town judge, she does not perform marriages. That is not part of the description of the work of a town judge,” Mayor Bob Jones told the Sublette Examiner in 2014.
However, the Commission advised Neely during the disciplinary proceedings that if she admitted wrongdoing and resigned her position, and agreed to never again run for judicial office, it would drop the matter. She declined.
The Commission then asked Neely in February if she would issue a public apology for her statement and agree to officiate same-sex ceremonies. She replied that she could not because of her religious convictions.
Therefore, the Commission recommended to the Wyoming Supreme Court that Neely be removed from office.
Now, religious liberty groups and lawmakers in the state are expressing concern that the Commission is seeking that Neely “be banned for life from the judiciary and pay up to $40,000 in fines merely for stating that her faith prevents her from personally performing same-sex weddings.”
“By the commission’s logic, jurists like Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito, Jr., of the United States Supreme Court could not sit on the bench in Wyoming,” Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which is representing Neely in court, outlined in legal briefs. “Not only have they written opinions explaining their view that the U.S. Constitution does not include a right to same-sex marriage, but also they (like Judge Neely) ascribe to a religious tradition that precludes them from celebrating a same-sex marriage.”
ADF also points to the Wyoming Constitution to note that those who hold public office cannot be deemed incompetent or ineligible because of their religion.
“The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship without discrimination or preference shall be forever guaranteed in this state, and no person shall be rendered incompetent to hold any office of trust or profit, or to serve as a witness or juror because of his opinion on any matter of religious belief whatever,” Article 1, Section 18 reads. “But the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of the state.”
On Monday, dozens of current and former legislators filed a petition in support of Neely with the Wyoming Supreme Court.
“As a local LGBT couple who actually knows Judge Neely put it: Punishing Judge Neely for her religious beliefs would be ‘obscene and offensive,'” Becket Fund legal counsel Daniel Blomberg said in a statement. “They were right. In America, the government doesn’t get to punish people for their religious beliefs—especially not for beliefs that the U.S. Supreme Court itself, in the very opinion that recognized same-sex marriage, said were ‘decent and honorable’ and held ‘in good faith by reasonable and sincere people.'”



We must all be equal in all ways, even when it comes to the culture and appearance of our communities.

BY The Daily Sheeple | Joshua Krause
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

For leftists, multiculturalism isn’t always about flooding a country with millions of immigrants from incompatible cultures, as we’ve seen in Europe over the past few years.
It’s also about integrating the cultures that already exist within a nation. As far as they’re concerned, a neighborhood that lacks diversity is unacceptable. We must all be equal in all ways, even when it comes to the culture and appearance of our communities.
That’s why Housing Secretary Julian Castro is going to launch a plan to punish the suburbs for being so white and wealthy. His “Small-Area Fair Market Rents” regulation will likely be signed off by Obama this October, and won’t require Congressional approval.
First and foremost, the plan will involve a massive increase in subsidies for section 8 housing. Impoverished inner city residents will be receiving vouchers that will allow them to afford housing in high cost suburbs, and government real estate agents will be assigned “mobility counselors,” to ensure that these impoverished minorities will be sent to the suburbs.
However, this isn’t just about sending the inner city’s poor into wealthy neighborhoods. It’s also about forcibly breaking up their former communities. While subsidies will be increased for people who want to move to the suburbs, they will be decreased for people who have the gall to stay in their low-income neighborhoods.
Once again, the left has shown that they don’t really care as much about the poor and minorities as they claim they do. To them, these people are just political pawns they can use to import crime and welfare dependent voters into areas that aren’t so liberal. They don’t really care about what different races or cultures want, and they don’t really care about what the rich and the poor want. They think they know what we all need, better than we do.

UN Plan To Destroy Rural America Exposed
Published on May 11, 2016
Alex Jones breaks down the UN Agenda 21 plan and how under the guise of promoting diversity, the government is destroying small town America.

Obama Moves The Hood To The Suburbs
Published on May 12, 2016
Community Organizing Supreme Commander President Barack Obama hates America so much, that even as a lame duck President, he intends on taking one last cheap shot at the success of the American dream. Obama and Julian Castro, Obama’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. In some kind of ongoing lightly reported bizarre social Agenda 21 experiment aim to punish the suburbs of America for all of the hard work that fueled their position in life.

The New York Post writes "Hillary’s rumored running mate, Housing Secretary Julian Castro, is cooking up a scheme to reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy. The scheme involves super-sizing vouchers to help urban poor afford higher rents in pricey areas, such as Westchester County, while assigning them government real estate agents called “mobility counselors” to secure housing in the exurbs."

Julian Castro, who the left is seeing as their Obama 2.0 and Hillary’s VP, was handpicked by the Obama Administration in 2014 from his position as Mayor of San Antonio, Texas to oversee Obama’s Social experimentation on the housing of America. Castro was highly criticized for the sale of thousands of foreclosed homes to Wall Street firms at bargain basement prices using HUD’s Distressed Assets Stabilization Program. 98% of those homes were sold to Wall Street firms.

Castro was brought in to assist Obama’s 2013 forced diversity HUD ruling where Agenda 21 would receive a tremendous steroid shot resulting in, as Stanley Kurtz author of "Spreading The Wealth: How Obama Is Robbing The Suburbs To Pay For the Cites” writes " as The Gateway Pundit reports...

"The new HUD rule is really about changing the way Americans live. It is part of a broader suite of initiatives designed to block suburban development, press Americans into hyper-dense cities, and force us out of our cars. Government-mandated ethnic and racial diversification plays a role in this scheme, yet the broader goal is forced “economic integration.”

The ultimate vision is to make all neighborhoods more or less alike, turning traditional cities into ultra-dense Manhattans, while making suburbs look more like cities do now. In this centrally-planned utopia, steadily increasing numbers will live cheek-by-jowl in “stack and pack” high-rises close to public transportation, while automobiles fall into relative disuse."

The Hill reports "In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal housing law allows people to challenge zoning laws and other housing practices that have a "disparate" or harmful impact on minority groups, even if there is no proof that the discrimination was intentional.

And two weeks after that Supreme Court ruling, HUD issued a regulation intended to help poor people move into "communities that are rich with opportunity," as HUD Secretary Castro phrased it at the time."

And now a settlement agreement with Baltimore County Maryland is making those fanatically utopian policies come to fruition. Due to a complaint filed with HUD in 2011 by the NAACP. 1,000 units will now be dispersed in the most affluent areas of Baltimore. And if that wasn’t enough to fundamentally alter the American landscape. Castro threatened to sue suburban landlords for discrimination if they refuse Section 8 tenants with criminal records.

Castro’s sucking up to Wall Street was seen as a potential toxic addition to Hillary’s campaign. But now, with this moronic and dangerous scheme to once again bring government leeching welfare recipients and criminals into the capitalistic and left wing perception of “ too White, white flight "quiet suburbs of America in the name of fighting inequality has the potential of placing the American Dream squarely above the toilet.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Last weekend, MassResistance reported that the Mayor of Boston and other state and local politicians gave a circus of a press conference in support of pending, draconian legislation in Massachusetts that would mandate all intimate, sex-segregated public facilities like restrooms and locker rooms be open to anyone, based on what he imagines or pretends his sex to be. The Mayor also flew a "transgender" flag over Boston City Hall.

In Alabama, the homofascists are viciously attacking Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, the "Ten Commandments Judge," who has been one of the few men in authority in the Unites States who is standing against the unconstitutional behavior of the U.S. Supreme Court. He has refused to meekly submit to the Court's lawless Obergefell decision and is now facing possible removal from his position because of it.

In Mississippi, the ACLU hounds of Hell and the "Campaign for Southern Equality" are suing the state over its new religious freedom protection law, which they falsely label as an "anti-LGBT" law. I have already debunked the lies that homofascists and their dupe supporters are telling about such laws.

And, of course we've heard ad nauseam the screeching and wailing against North Carolina's sensible law preventing people from using private facilities meant for the opposite sex.

These are just a few of the many examples of the militant homosexual/"transgender," homofascist, assault on what's right and true. Some may wonder how in the world this movement has been so successful in recent years. The most obvious reason is the corruption and self-deception that have crept into the hearts of the American people on a scale not seen before in the United States. With the broad rejection of the God of all creation and His unfailing Word comes deep deception among the people who reject Him. That's a given.

When people reject the Lord and put man's whim in His place, the unchangeable definitions of right and wrong are effectively abolished. Paul warns us in 2 Timothy chapter 4 that there will come a time when people will not endure sound doctrine, which means truth. When people reject truth, and instead claim that truth is whatever any given person believes it is, then we can no longer effectively point to the transcendent plumb line of God's Word – the source of all truth – to persuade people of what's right and wrong.

This is where we are today, and it's largely why the sinister, militant homosexual/"transgender movement is steamrolling across our nation. When we tell the truth about this movement, far too many people are willingly deceived into rejecting what we say.

For all practical purposes, we are witnessing the "death" of right and wrong, but don't misunderstand me. Right and wrong have never changed, and they never will. Our popular culture, our laws and institutions, our rulers and many people – even the whole world – can deny what's right and wrong till they're blue in the face, but their denials will change nothing. God's Word, His truth, remains unmoved.

The truth about this virulently anti-Christian, sexual anarchy movement is simple. It's a movement based on aggressive rebellion against God and His natural order. It's a movement whose members are "useful idiot" tools of satanic forces that seek to crush Christianity and Christian freedom, to abolish even a hint of Jesus in the public square. Yes, that's the heart, the demonic essence, of this thing. It represents Godless tyranny.

The truth, which has never changed and never will, is that homosexual behavior is a vile corruption of our human design. It's a gross affront to God, to whom we're all accountable, whether we like to admit it or not. It's an immoral, self-destructive, dangerous, unnatural behavior. It is sin.

The truth is that marriage is, and has always been, one thing only: the union of a man and a woman. Two men or two women can never, ever make a marriage union. The most they can do is make a perverse mockery of marriage, which will never be the real deal, and no amount of demented laws will change this fact.

The truth is that we are each made male or female. Period. End of story. A man who wishes/believes/imagines/pretends he is a woman (and the reverse) is a man with mental and spiritual problems. He needs help aligning his mind with reality, not encouragement to remain wedded to his delusion.

The truth is that a man can never, ever be a woman, no matter how desperately he attempts to imitate the appearance of a woman; no matter what kind of hormone cocktails he takes; no matter what kind of surgical mutilations he undergoes. He remains a man, albeit a mentally sick man with a grotesque appearance.

The truth is that this is not about "civil rights" or "discrimination." Degenerate sexual behavior is not a "civil right," nor is it an example of "unfair" treatment when people refuse to give perverts affirmation in their sick behavior. It's quite right to discriminate between men and women and to prevent men from being in private, sex-segregated facilities with women.

This is one of the deceptions that has taken in far too many people today. The sexual degeneracy movement has illegitimately linked itself to the true civil rights movement, but it's a false link. There is no relationship between sin and ethnicity. None. There are no civil rights being denied to homosexuals or mentally ill people who deludedly think they're the opposite sex. They have all the same rights as everyone else.

Just yesterday, we could simply say that this is wrong and we're not having any of it, but today far too many people are unable (or unwilling) to see that it's wrong. Yesterday, we wouldn't have to point out to anyone that there's no such thing as "transgenderism" or same-sex "marriage," because these things were rightly understood to be so. Yesterday, no one would think twice about a baker saying NO to creating a "wedding" cake for two men. Yesterday, no one would dictate "non-discrimination" laws to punish those opposed to affirming or even "celebrating" the indefensible, infamous crime against nature.

Today, insanity reigns. Today, we are witnessing a ramping up of the war against God and His people (an age-old war), which is also a war against freedom, morality, sanity, reason, knowledge, wisdom, reality, truth, the family, marriage and the very meaning of male and female. But, as Christians, we know how this ends. We know that Jesus has already won the war. And, while they can certainly be a royal pain in the neck, our earthly enemies are not the true enemy. But, dark days are ahead.


Democratic Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, left, hugs Mass. state Rep. Denise Provost, D-Somerville, right, during a ceremony held to commemorate the raising of a flag representing the transgender community at Boston City Hall, in Boston, Monday, May 2, 2016. State lawmakers are weighing a bill that would extend protections to transgender individuals in public places. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)


Boston Mayor, Senate president, other politicians join radical activists raising “transgender” flag over Boston City Hall. Hold press conference vowing to fight to pass "bathroom bill".

See VIDEO from their ridiculous speeches, below.

Complete disconnect from reality?

SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

May 7, 2016
You really have to see this for yourself …
On May 2, the Massachusfsetts Legislature’s controversial transgender public accommodations “bathroom” bill (H4253 / S735) was brought out of committee, on its way to votes in the full House and Senate. The bill covers not only bathrooms and locker rooms, but also all locations that could be designated "public accommodations" under the Mass. statute.
The following day, Tuesday, May 3, a bizarre “transgender flag” was officially raised over Boston City Hall. That afternoon the Mayor of Boston, Senate President, Boston City Council President  joined radical transgender activists for a press conference at the adjoining City Hall Plaza, to promote passage of the bill.
Yes, this is the "transgender flag" flying over Boston City Hall!
[All photos by MassResistance]
People know that blue state and big city politicians tend to be liberal. But as the “culture wars” go on, most people aren’t aware of how profoundly disconnected from reality many of these elected officials have become. It is sadly not an exaggeration to say that promoting mental illness and sexual perversion as a “civil right” has become the norm.
According to the activists, this is the first time the “transgender flag” has been flown in the state of Massachusetts. Mayor Walsh said in his speech that he intends to keep it flying over City Hall until full “transgender rights” become state law.
To the average person, on the surface, the press conference looked like a circus with bizarre rhetoric, revealing a disturbing disconnect from reality.
But the speakers were all very serious and emotional. It was not mere “political correctness.” Their incredibly elitist attitude and their utter in-your-face disdain for the opinions and values that most Americans hold on this issue was clear and unmistakable.

*** VIDEO: See and hear for yourself!   (8 min 32 sec) ***

A few things to note: For this occasion, most of the politicians wore “transgender” color-coordinated blue-pink-purple clothes.
Also, many of the politicians and activists were wearing green ribbons, obviously in recognition of "Mental Health Awareness Month." The irony of that was clearly lost on the group!
Some of the "highlights" from the speeches:
Master of ceremonies - woman with a beard: Mason Dunn, head of statewide transgender activist group.”We raise the flag in support of trans rights here in Massachusetts and nationally.”
Boston Mayor Marty Walsh. “I don't want our state to fall behind on this . . . We've seen what happens in states when they go in the other direction: their freedoms suffer, their reputations suffer, their economy suffers.”
State Senate President Stanley Rosenberg (self-identified homosexual): “We will send a message that we are not Mississippi, we are not Georgia, we are not North Carolina…. We are on the cusp of doing what should have been done a long time ago. But make no mistake. We will add to the momentum so this will become the law of the land across the entire United States of America.”
Michelle Wu, President of Boston City Council: Bragged about how the City Council has passed a ban on taxpayer-funded travel to North Carolina, and has mandated taxpayer-funding for “transgender” sex-change medical procedures for city workers and their families.
LGBT Youth Activist - man dressed as woman. Grace Sterling Stowell, leader of homosexual / transgender “youth” group that gets state support. Says he’s worked with “thousands” of young people to deal with their “gender expression” issues. (He has been recognized by a national LGBT group for his decades of radical activism.)
“Entertainment” – a transgender singing group. Men with fake breasts and women with facial hair.
The press swooned!
The mainstream press was swooning over this. But they ultimately covered it only superficially – leaving out the radical parts. (See Boston Globe article here.) Luckily, MassResistance was there, too.
"Transgender" poster child. And of course, they brought young children. Child in photo is a 5-year old girl that the parents are bringing up as a boy, and is publicly featured on the transgender lobby website. Very sad.

Problem for pols

Interestingly, one of the big sticking points among many state legislators of voting for this bill is the predicted anger and outrage from their constituents, especially with this year’s upcoming elections. (Even in Massachusetts, the average person has a problem with the state ordering that men must be allowed into in women’s restrooms and showers.) But the legislative leadership is convinced that people who disagree are just backwards and ignorant. They think their fellow legislators should just have the “courage” to “do what’s best.”

What a coincidence: An ACTUAL circus was being set up just yards away from the press conference, in Boston City Hall Plaza!

Truth is the biggest casualty

This is what happens when politically correct nonsense is allowed to be repeated and repeated without challenge. It is why it we keep saying that boldly telling the truth about this – to politicians and others – is so important in this fight. We must strongly oppose laws that are based on ideological fantasy and people’s unfortunate delusions, and are intended to oppress and punish citizens who don’t agree.
The State Senate is set to vote on this public accommodations “bathroom” bill on May 12, followed by the House. We'll keep you up to date on this issue.
Transgender activists posing for a few quick shots.


Gay Pride flag raising - Boston City Hall
Published on Jun 10, 2015
Boston Mayor Marty Walsh highlighted this "ceremony" to start Gay Pride Week 2015 in Boston. Featuring "Pussy Riot" as honored guests, various bizaarre LGBT activists, and a large group of politicians.

February 05, 2014 – Brooklyn, New York, United States: Members of the punk band Pussy Riot, Nadezhda “Nadya” Tolokonnikova (R) and Maria “Masha” Alyokhina (L) speak at Amnesty International’s “Bring Human Rights Back Home” concert at Barclays Center. Natan Dvir/Polaris/Newscom. License this image from polphotos277760
Pussy Riot. Two members of the feminist rock punk group who were recently released from prison in Russia, have been causing quite the stir around this year’s Olympics. They have encouraged people to boycott the winter games, in protest against the anti-gay nation. The two women are taking there ideas to New York.

Pussy Riot say Pride events in Toronto, Boston are nothing like home in Russia


The History of Pussy Riot in 50 Seconds