Translate

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

JUDGE IN SCALIA DEATH TURNS BACK ON REPORTERS WHEN QUESTIONED ON AUTOPSY PROCEDURE~CLAIMS LOCAL NEWSPAPER CAN SPEAK FOR HER~WILL OBAMA NOMINATE LORETTA LYNCH?


WHY WON'T SHE TALK?
IS SHE COVERING FOR ____?
HELPED TIP THE BALANCE OF POWER?
TO HER?
EXCERPT:
"Guevara arrived at the ranch around 4:30pm. Based on more evidence at the ranch, Guevara declared Scalia’s death was of natural causes. U.S Marshal Service and the FBI were also at the scene."
County Judge

Cinderela Guevara
432-729-4452
432-729-4453 FAX
P.O. BOX 606
300 N. Highland Avenue


Assistant to County Judge
Crystal S. Funke
432-729-4452
crystalfunke@co.presidio.tx.us
Judge In Scalia Death Turns Back On Reporters When Questioned on Procedure
Published on Feb 16, 2016
Democrat Judge Cinderella Guevara turns her back on Infowars reporter David Knight when questioned over the rush to have zero investigation into the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.


Shady Public Servants Quiet On Scalia's Death
Published on Feb 17, 2016
Alex Jones plays a video of Inofwars reporter David Knight confronting judge Cinderella Guevara about her choice to not go in person to determine cause of death and then talks directly with David Knight about what they've uncovered there at the ranch where Justice Scalia died.


Scalia Cover-Up: Secrets Inside Cibolo Creek Ranch
Published on Feb 17, 2016
Infowars reporter Joe Biggs is inside the Cibolo Creek Ranch where the mysterious circumstances of Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia’s death continue to grow. 


No Autopsy For Scalia,
Yet Mandatory Autopsies For Illegals
Published on Feb 17, 2016
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Antonin Scalia was appointed in 1986 by President Ronald Reagan. Scalia served as a safeguard for the Constitution, a staunch opponent to the liberal view point that the Constitution is a living document to be interpreted by progressive demands.

Clearly, this viewpoint counters President Obama’s quasi progressive conquest to fundamentally transform the United States. Obama’s violation of the Constitution is a constant, even as he faces a lame duck presidency. But with Scalia gone and the possibility of Obama's Free Speech assailing lackey Loretta Lynch receiving the Supreme Court Nomination, Obama could find himself in the drivers seat once again making tracks down the road to tyranny before his term ends.

Upon hearing Scalia’s death due to natural causes, most people brushed it off. He was 79 years old. But then the fumbling of the details began. Presidio County Judge Cinderella Guevara pronounced Scalia dead due to natural causes without seeing the body or ordering an autopsy. And the highly decorated Vietnam Veteran and prized Democratic party donor and Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter continually changed his story until he blurted out that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head and the sheets were unwrinkled.

Any signs of strangulation uncovered by a mandatory standard autopsy, such as a petechial hemorrhage would have sounded off alarm bells. Meanwhile, towns like Falfurrias, Texas shell out money they don’t have to perform autopsies on illegal aliens. Once again, Americans are left in the dark to either theorize or ignore what really happened to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Currently, it may not appear that Scalia’s suspicious end at a West Texas resort amounts to much to the average citizen, 32% of which have never even heard of him according to a Gallup Poll. But in the months to come, if all goes well for Obama by way of a corporacratic faux Republican majority in Congress and Obama’s go it alone approach to the Executive office. Scalia’s death will be regarded as the final nail to be driven into the Federal Republic of the United States as Obama transforms the United States into a Unitary republic legally ruled by an all powerful central government.


Published on Feb 17, 2016
Veteran homicide investigators in New York and Washington, DC, on Monday questioned the way local and federal authorities in Texas handled the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

“It’s not unreasonable to ask for an autopsy in this case, particularly knowing who he is,” retired Brooklyn homicide Detective Patricia Tufo told The Post. http://nypost.com/2016/02/15/detectiv...

Detectives Question Lack of Autopsy in Scalia Death
Published on Feb 17, 2016
Veteran homicide investigators in New York and Washington, DC, are shocked with the way local and federal authorities in Texas handled the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.


DID TEXAS JUDGE VIOLATE PENAL CODE IN JUSTICE SCALIA CASE?

Many citizens and reporters are concerned that procedure was not correctly followed


FIRST AMENDMENT CRITIC MAY GET 

SCOTUS NOMINATION

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has publicly expressed enmity toward First Amendment

BY KURT NIMMO
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/first-amendment-critic-may-get-scotus-nomination/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

First Amendment Critic May Get SCOTUS Nomination
Influential Supreme Court blogger Tom Goldstein believes Obama will select his attorney general to replace Antonin Scalia.
Goldstein initially believed Ninth Circuit Judge Paul Watford would get the nomination. “On reflection, I think that Attorney General Loretta Lynch is more likely. I also think that the Republicans will eventually permit the nomination to proceed on the merits and reject it on party lines,” he wrote on Sunday.
In December Lynch attacked the First Amendment. She criticized “the ability of people to issue hateful speech of all types from the anonymity of a screen.”
Speaking to a Muslim Advocates dinner in Arlington, Virginia, Lynch said although “this is a country that is based upon free speech,” she promised that the Justice Department would “take action” when speech “edges towards violence, when we see the potential to lift… that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric.”
Realizing the perception created by the call to prosecute individuals exercising their right to free speech under the First Amendment, Lynch later “recalibrated” her remarks.
“Of course, we prosecute deeds and not words,” she said at a press conference held to announce a Justice Department civil rights investigation into the Chicago Police Department.
Lynch’s comment about the “anonymity of a screen” is direct reference to the internet. In 1997 the Supreme Court ruled in Reno v. ACLU that the internet is entitled to the highest level of First Amendment protection akin to that afforded to the print medium.
The Double Standard of a Liberal First Amendment
Liberals contend “hate speech” is excluded from First Amendment protection.
In May, 2015, CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, the son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo and a former ABC News chief law and justice correspondent, tweeted that the First Amendment does not protect so-called hate speech. “Hate speech is excluded from protection. Don’t just say you love the Constitution  read it.” The tweet was removed following a backlash.
So pervasive is the highly selective liberal standard on free speech, a full 40% of college educated millennials believe the government has the authority to persecute individuals who make offensive comments against government designated minority groups.
Pew Research poll, however, found a majority of Americans support the First Amendment. Democrats lead those who believe the government should be able to limit speech.
First Amendment: The Cornerstone of Liberty
The architects of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights understood that freedom of speech and religion—both are contained and linked in the First amendment—are essential for the exercise of liberty.
“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost,” wrote Thomas Jefferson.
Benjamin Franklin noted that freedom of speech is integral to the Constitution. “Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government: When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and limited monarchies derive their strength and vigor from a popular examination into the action of the magistrates,” he wrote.
Writing as Silence Dogood, a pen name used for articles published by his brother’s newspaper, the New-England Courant, Franklin said: “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.”
Upon receiving the  Lauterbach Award in 1952, William O. Douglas, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, said: “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us.”
A Liberal Court and the Death of a Constitutional Republic
If nominated and confirmed, as Goldstein predicts, Lynch will carry the liberal mantle to the highest court.
Prior to his death under suspicious circumstances, Justice Scalia said liberalism has diluted the constitutional role of the Court. He said the majority of justices are “not adhering to the text, they’re operating as policy makers They’re not interpreting the Constitution. They’re writing one, they’re revising one.”
Scalia said the principles of a constitutional republic are in jeopardy under the sway of liberal judges. “I cannot imagine the system can continue with more and more of the basic rules made by the Supreme Court.”